Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Identification of phase correlations in Financial Stock Market Turbulence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Fourier bispectrum reveals phase correlations in Infosys stock prices—evidence that its market is not fully developed turbulence—while nine other NSE stocks and the Nifty 50 index show no such correlations.

desk verdict A well-intentioned econophysics paper that renames the bispectrum, applies it to NSE data, and claims an Infosys anomaly -- but the synthetic validation uses a frequency relation inconsistent with the estimator, so the central finding is unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20105 v2 pith:EVIO333P submitted 2025-08-12 q-fin.ST physics.data-an

classification q-fin.STphysics.data-an
keywords phasecorrelationsbispectrumextendedFouriertransformfinancialturbulenceNationalStockExchangeefficientmarkethypothesisinformationasymmetrytickdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attempts to detect whether price cycles in a stock market carry hidden phase relationships, using a Fourier-based quantity that ordinary power spectra throw away. The proposed diagnostic—a bispectrum built from products of Fourier modes—should be flat when cycles are independent and should spike when a third cycle inherits its phase from two others. Applied to one-minute prices for ten National Stock Exchange stocks and the Nifty 50 index from 2015 to 2022, it finds spikes only in Infosys. The paper reads this as evidence that Infosys's price fluctuations are not in a fully developed turbulent state, while the other nine stocks and the index are. If true, the method offers a way to classify market turbulence and to flag individual securities whose price cycles appear phase-locked—potentially because information has entered the price.

What carries the argument

The Extended Fourier Transform (a bispectrum), defined as $P(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)=F(\omega_\alpha)F(\omega_\beta)F^{*}(\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta)$. It multiplies two Fourier modes and then by the complex conjugate of the mode at their sum frequency. This product cancels the phases of independent modes and accumulates only when a mode at $\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta$ is phase-locked to the two lower modes. The paper uses this sensitivity to classify a time series as fully developed turbulence (flat bispectrum, no phase correlations) or not (spikes in the bispectrum).

What would settle it

Reconstruct the synthetic test with $\omega_\gamma=\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta$ and $\theta_\gamma=\theta_\alpha+\theta_\beta$, recompute the bispectrum, and see whether the spike appears at $(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)$ and disappears when the phase locking is removed. Independently, recompute the Infosys bispectrum on rolling sub-windows to check whether the reported spikes are stable across 2015–2022 or concentrated in one period.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the product $P(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)=F(\omega_\alpha)F(\omega_\beta)F^{*}(\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta)$—an extended Fourier transform, equivalently a bispectrum—exposes phase relations that the usual power spectrum discards. In synthetic signals with independent phases this quantity stays flat; when a third mode is constructed with phase $\theta_\gamma=\theta_\alpha+\theta_\beta$, spikes appear. Applied to one-minute NSE tick data for ten stocks and the Nifty 50 from 2015 to 2022, the spikes appear only for Infosys. The paper concludes that Infosys's price cycles are phase-correlated and therefore its market has not reached a fully developed turbulent s

Load-bearing premise

The entire interpretation of the stock-market spikes rests on the assumption that the synthetic benchmark places its planted phase correlation precisely at the frequency pair the estimator checks; if that premise fails, the method's claimed sensitivity to phase correlations in real price data would not be established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, ordinary power-spectrum plots are insufficient for judging market turbulence: the nine apparently noisy stocks and Nifty 50 look identical to Infosys in their amplitude spectra, and only the phase-sensitive bispectrum separates them.
  • For Infosys, the presence of phase-locked cycles implies that its price movement is not a purely random walk, and the coupled frequencies become a concrete place to look for the information or market event that created the coupling.
  • The diagnostic can be applied to any security or index as a classification test, using tick data of any interval, without modifying the estimator.
  • For the other NSE series, the result is a baseline: their price fluctuations are consistent with independent cycles and fully developed turbulence over 2015–2022.
  • The method links financial market analysis to the turbulence diagnostic used in fluid and plasma physics, giving a quantitative meaning to 'market turbulence' beyond volatility.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the synthetic benchmark—not reported in the paper—would generate the third mode with $\omega_\gamma=\omega_\alpha+\omega_\beta$ and $\theta_\gamma=\theta_\alpha+\theta_\beta$, and confirm the spike lands exactly at $(\omega_\alpha,\omega_\beta)$; the paper's validation instead uses the reciprocal relation $1/\omega_\gamma=1/\omega_\alpha+1/\omega_\beta$, a different condition.
  • Extending the analysis to rolling sub-periods of Infosys tick data would show whether the phase correlation is a persistent property of the whole 2015–2022 window or is driven by a single short episode; the paper only reports the full-window result.
  • If the phase-correlation signature is reproducible, the same bispectrum could be computed for many stocks and used as an early-warning statistic: a security leaving the fully developed turbulent state may be one whose price is becoming predictable or manipulated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an 'Extended Fourier Transform' (EFT), i.e., a bispectrum diagnostic, to detect phase correlations between Fourier modes in financial time series. The authors construct two synthetic signals: one with independent random phases and one in which the third mode's phase is the sum of the first two phases and whose frequency obeys 1/ωγ = 1/ωα + 1/ωβ. They claim that the EFT shows spikes only for the phase-coupled signal. They then apply the method to 1-minute NSE tick data for ten stocks and the Nifty 50 index, report that only Infosys exhibits bispectrum spikes, and conclude that Infosys is not in a fully developed turbulent state and that information may have been artificially introduced into its price. The paper also tests the EFT on white noise, Gaussian noise, and simulations of Burgers and diffusion turbulence.

Significance. If the method were correctly validated and the empirical result were robust, the application of bispectrum analysis to financial phase correlations could be a useful complement to standard spectral methods in econophysics. The paper has a reasonable intuition: use a higher-order spectral diagnostic to look for phase coupling in price series. The tests on noise and on simulated turbulence, and the fact that the bispectrum is a long-established external diagnostic, are in principle strengths. However, the central validation is internally inconsistent (the synthetic data do not match the estimator), and the key empirical finding rests on visual inspection without any statistical threshold. The interpretive leap from phase coupling to 'artificially introduced information' is unsupported. As presented, the paper does not establish its central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [E.1/E.2/H.3/H.4, Eqs. (3), (6)] The synthetic validation is inconsistent with the estimator. The estimator is P(ωα,ωβ)=F(ωα)F(ωβ)F*(ωα+ωβ), so a peak at (ωα,ωβ) requires a Fourier component at the sum frequency ωα+ωβ. The synthetic signal, however, places the third mode at ωγ defined by 1/ωγ=1/ωα+1/ωβ. With ωα=0.22 and ωβ=0.375, the constructed ωγ≈0.1387, while ωα+ωβ=0.595. Thus the stated synthetic signal does not create a Fourier mode at the frequency probed by the bispectrum, and the claimed validation spikes cannot appear from the mechanism described. Unless the implementation silently uses a different frequency relation than the text reports, the benchmark that gives meaning to the later Infosys spikes is not established. This is a load-bearing error.
  2. [F/H.5] The central empirical claim—that Infosys shows phase-correlation spikes while Nifty 50 and the other nine stocks do not—is based entirely on visual inspection of 2-D plots. No threshold, surrogate test, or error bar is provided to define what counts as a spike or to distinguish a genuine bispectrum peak from finite-sample fluctuations. Without a quantitative criterion, the statements that Infosys 'revealed some correlation' and that the other stocks show 'no such correlation' are not supported. This is especially serious because the synthetic validation is already inconsistent; the empirical peaks are therefore uncalibrated.
  3. [D/F/G] The interpretation that bispectrum spikes imply information was 'artificially introduced' into Infosys is not justified. A bispectrum peak indicates phase coupling among Fourier modes, which can arise from nonlinear dynamics, non-stationarity, or other natural mechanisms; it does not by itself identify deliberate information injection. The paper moves from a statistical diagnostic to a causal claim without an independent test (e.g., event analysis, comparison with a null model of price formation). Similarly, equating 'no bispectrum peaks' with 'fully developed turbulence' overstates the physical analogy. These interpretive steps go beyond what the data and the method support.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3) vs. Eq. (6)] The notation is inconsistent: Eq. (3) defines p(ωα), while Eq. (6) defines p(ωα,ωβ). Since the quantity depends on two frequencies, use P(ωα,ωβ) consistently throughout.
  2. [Section F, text near Figures 3 and 7] The text says 'spikes as shown in Figure 3' and 'Refer to 1 2', but Figure 3 is the white-noise EFT plot; the relevant figures are Figures 2 and 11. Please correct the cross-references.
  3. [Section E.3] The Box-Muller transform generates Gaussian white noise, not 'colored noise' as stated, unless additional spectral shaping is applied. Clarify which noise model is intended, since the distinction matters for the interpretation of the test.
  4. [Section E.4] The table of the ten stocks is introduced with 'Refer E.4', but the table has no caption or number. Table numbering and references should be completed.
  5. [Throughout] The method is the standard bispectrum (Kim & Powers, 1979). The paper should cite that original literature in the main text rather than only in a self-reference; the current citation [54] is to the authors' own prior work. This would put the claimed novelty in context.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bispectrum estimator is an external diagnostic, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the self-citation [54] is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central diagnostic, p(ωα,ωβ)=F(ωα)F(ωβ)F*(ωα+ωβ), is the standard bispectrum, explicitly identified in Sec. A.2 as the Kim & Powers (1979) integral-transform analysis; it is not defined in terms of the stock-market outcome. No parameter is fitted to the market data to make Infosys anomalous; the reported 'spikes' are direct outputs of a fixed estimator applied to the price time series. The classification 'not fully developed turbulence' follows from the paper's stated definition that fully developed turbulence has no phase correlations, which is an operational definition rather than a fitted input. The self-citation [54] for Eq. (3) is not load-bearing because the same estimator is independently attributed to Kim & Powers and to prior turbulence/plasma work. A separate internal-validity concern exists: the synthetic validation in Sec. E.1/H.3 plants the third mode with 1/ωγ=1/ωα+1/ωβ, whereas the estimator in Eq. (3)/Eq. (6) requires a Fourier component at ωα+ωβ, a mismatch that, if correct, would invalidate the calibration. That is a serious correctness problem, but it is not a circularity: the market conclusion does not reduce to a fitted parameter, a self-citation, or an equation equivalent to its own input. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of Fourier decomposition of raw, unaltered price series, on importing a fluid-turbulence definition of phase correlation into finance, and on the ability to identify bispectrum peaks by eye. None of these is established with data, surrogates, or significance tests.

free parameters (2)
  • Synthetic frequencies omega_alpha, omega_beta = omega_alpha=0.22, omega_beta=0.375
    Chosen by hand for the illustrative three-wave tests in E.2; they do not drive the market conclusion.
  • Burgers/diffusion simulation parameters = nu=3e-3, A=6, N=2^10, dt=1e-4, L=2pi
    Tuning values for the validation runs in E.3; not fitted to stock data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fourier decomposition applies to raw 1-minute NSE price series without detrending or stationarity preprocessing.
    Section E.4 says unaltered raw data are used; non-stationarity is never addressed, and DFT of non-stationary data can produce artifacts.
  • domain assumption In a fully developed turbulent medium, Fourier phases are uncorrelated, so absence of bispectrum peaks means turbulence and presence means non-turbulence.
    Sections A.1 and F state this fluid-turbulence criterion and transfer it to stock prices without justification.
  • ad hoc to paper Bispectrum peaks in stock prices can be interpreted as evidence that information was artificially introduced.
    Section F makes this leap directly from the Infosys spikes; no model, prior, or control supports it.
  • ad hoc to paper Spikes can be identified by visual inspection without a statistical threshold.
    Section F reports spikes in Figures 7-8 and the appendix without any quantitative significance criterion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Identification of phase correlations in Financial Stock Market Turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EVIO333P

@misc{pith2026250820105,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Identification of phase correlations in Financial Stock Market Turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EVIO333P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20105}
}
read the original abstract

The basis of arbitrage methods depends on the circulation of information within the framework of the financial market. Following the work of Modigliani and Miller, it has become a vital part of discussions related to the study of financial networks and predictions. The emergence of the efficient market hypothesis by Fama, Fisher, Jensen and Roll in the early 1970s opened up the door for discussion of information affecting the price in the market and thereby creating asymmetries and price distortion. Whenever the micro and macroeconomic factors change, there is a high probability of information asymmetry in the market, and this asymmetry of information creates turbulence in the market. The analysis and interpretation of turbulence caused by the differences in information is crucial in understanding the nature of the stock market using price patterns and fluctuations. Even so, the traditional approaches are not capable of analyzing the cyclical price fluctuations outside the realm of wave structures of securities prices, and a proper and effective technique to assess the nature of the Financial market. Consequently, the analysis of the price fluctuations by applying the theories and computational techniques of mathematical physics ensures that such cycles are disintegrated, and the outcome of decomposed cycles is elucidated to understand the impression of the information on the genesis and discovery of price and to assess the nature of stock market turbulence. In this regard, the paper will provide a framework of Spectrum analysis that decomposes the pricing patterns and is capable of determining the pricing behavior, eventually assisting in examining the nature of turbulence in the National Stock Exchange of India.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20105 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Raw data, spectrum and the extended integral transform of the second set of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Raw data, spectrum and the extended integral transform of second set of artificially [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Uniform Random Numbers, their spectrum and the extended integral transform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Gaussian Random Numbers, its spectrum and the extended integral transform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulated turbulence data with forcing and nonlinear interactions, spectrum and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated diffusive fluid turbulence data, spectrum, and the extended integral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Raw data, Turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of Nifty 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Raw data, Turbulence spectrum, and the extended integral transform of Infosys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Raw data of the first and second sets of artificially generated data mentioned [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Frequency Spectrum of the first and second sets of artificially generated data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Extended integral transform of the first and second set of artificially generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of ICICI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of SBI Index [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of Dabur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of HUL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of M&M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of Tata [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of JSW [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of Tata Steel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Raw data, turbulence spectrum and the extended integral transform of TCS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The behavior of stock-market prices.The journal of Business, 38(1): 34–105, 1965

    Eugene F Fama. The behavior of stock-market prices.The journal of Business, 38(1): 34–105, 1965

  2. [2]

    Efficient capital markets.Journal of finance, 25(2):383–417, 1970

    Eugene F Fama. Efficient capital markets.Journal of finance, 25(2):383–417, 1970

  3. [3]

    The adjustment of stock prices to new information.International economic review, 10(1):1–21, 1969

    Eugene F Fama, Lawrence Fisher, Michael C Jensen, and Richard Roll. The adjustment of stock prices to new information.International economic review, 10(1):1–21, 1969

  4. [4]

    The efficient market hypothesis and insider trading on the stock market.Journal of Political Economy, 98(1):70–93, 1990

    Jean-Jacques Laffont and Eric S Maskin. The efficient market hypothesis and insider trading on the stock market.Journal of Political Economy, 98(1):70–93, 1990

  5. [5]

    The impact of public information on the stock market.The Journal of Finance, 49(3):923–950, 1994

    Mark L Mitchell and J Harold Mulherin. The impact of public information on the stock market.The Journal of Finance, 49(3):923–950, 1994. 26

  6. [6]

    Information asymmetry and asset prices: Evidence from the china foreign share discount.The Journal of Finance, 63(1): 159–196, 2008

    Kalok Chan, Albert J Menkveld, and Zhishu Yang. Information asymmetry and asset prices: Evidence from the china foreign share discount.The Journal of Finance, 63(1): 159–196, 2008

  7. [7]

    Are stock markets really efficient? evidence of the adaptive market hypothesis.International Review of Financial Analysis, 47:39–49, 2016

    Andrew Urquhart and Frank McGroarty. Are stock markets really efficient? evidence of the adaptive market hypothesis.International Review of Financial Analysis, 47:39–49, 2016

  8. [8]

    Rodney L

    Stephen A Ross et al.Return, risk and arbitrage. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School . . . , 1973

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence.Journal of economic perspectives, 18(3):25–46, 2004

    Eugene F Fama and Kenneth R French. The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence.Journal of economic perspectives, 18(3):25–46, 2004

  2. [10]

    A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10):2148–2177, 2008

    Marina Martynova and Luc Renneboog. A century of corporate takeovers: What have we learned and where do we stand?Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(10):2148–2177, 2008

  3. [11]

    Are there long cycles in common stock returns? Southern economic journal, pages 141–149, 1988

    Kursat Aydogan and G Geoffrey Booth. Are there long cycles in common stock returns? Southern economic journal, pages 141–149, 1988

  4. [12]

    A prediction approach for stock market volatility based on time series data.IEEE Access, 7:17287–17298, 2019

    Sheikh Mohammad Idrees, M Afshar Alam, and Parul Agarwal. A prediction approach for stock market volatility based on time series data.IEEE Access, 7:17287–17298, 2019

  5. [13]

    Stock market forecasting.Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 206–214, 1944

    Alfred Cowles. Stock market forecasting.Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 206–214, 1944

  6. [14]

    Efficient market hypothesis

    Burton G Malkiel. Efficient market hypothesis. InFinance, pages 127–134. Springer, 1989. 27

  7. [15]

    An integrated early warning system for stock market turbulence.Expert Systems with Applications, 153:113463, 2020

    Peiwan Wang, Lu Zong, and Ye Ma. An integrated early warning system for stock market turbulence.Expert Systems with Applications, 153:113463, 2020

  8. [16]

    Cambridge university press, 1999

    Rosario N Mantegna and H Eugene Stanley.Introduction to econophysics: correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge university press, 1999

  9. [17]

    Forecasting turbulence in the asian and european stock market using regime-switching models.Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2(2):388–406, 2018

    Janina Engel, Markus Wahl, and Rudi Zagst. Forecasting turbulence in the asian and european stock market using regime-switching models.Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2(2):388–406, 2018

  10. [18]

    Stock price network autoregressive model with application to stock market turbulence.The European Physical Journal B, 93:1–15, 2020

    Arash Sioofy Khoojine and Dong Han. Stock price network autoregressive model with application to stock market turbulence.The European Physical Journal B, 93:1–15, 2020

  11. [19]

    Observation of toroidal acoustic mode in a current-less toroidal plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(7), 2019

    Umesh Kumar, Rajaraman Ganesh, Sathyanarayana Krishnamachari, and Yogesh C Saxena. Observation of toroidal acoustic mode in a current-less toroidal plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(7), 2019

  12. [20]

    Effect of magnetic field topology on quasi-stationary equilibrium, fluctuations, and flows in a simple toroidal device.Physics of Plasmas, 23(10), 2016

    Umesh Kumar, Shekar G Thatipamula, R Ganesh, YC Saxena, and D Raju. Effect of magnetic field topology on quasi-stationary equilibrium, fluctuations, and flows in a simple toroidal device.Physics of Plasmas, 23(10), 2016

  13. [21]

    Springer, 1982

    Henri J Nussbaumer and Henri J Nussbaumer.The fast Fourier transform. Springer, 1982

  14. [22]

    Observation of toroidal acoustic mode in a current-less toroidal plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(7), 2019

    Umesh Kumar, Rajaraman Ganesh, Sathyanarayana Krishnamachari, and Yogesh C Saxena. Observation of toroidal acoustic mode in a current-less toroidal plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(7), 2019. 28

  15. [23]

    McGraw-Hill New York, 1951

    Benjamin Graham, David Le Fevre Dodd, Sidney Cottle, and Charles Tatham.Security analysis: Principles and technique. McGraw-Hill New York, 1951

  16. [24]

    Harper Collins New York, 2005

    Benjamin Graham and Bill McGowan.The intelligent investor. Harper Collins New York, 2005

  17. [25]

    Dow’s Theory

    William Peter Hamilton.The Stock Market Barometer: A Study of Its Forecast Value Based on Charles H. Dow’s Theory. Cosimo, Inc., 2006

  18. [26]

    Evolution of the dow theory.Financial Analysts Journal, 17(5): 23–26, 1961

    George W Bishop Jr. Evolution of the dow theory.Financial Analysts Journal, 17(5): 23–26, 1961

  19. [27]

    Dow theory for the 21st century.Technical Indicators for Improving Your Investment Results, 4, 2008

    Jack Schannep. Dow theory for the 21st century.Technical Indicators for Improving Your Investment Results, 4, 2008

  20. [28]

    The dow theory of stock prices.Social Research, pages 204–224, 1942

    Harold S Benjamin. The dow theory of stock prices.Social Research, pages 204–224, 1942

  21. [29]

    Technical analysis in financial markets

    Gerwin A W Griffioen. Technical analysis in financial markets. 2003

  22. [30]

    Stock market forecasting using computational intelligence: A survey.Archives of computational methods in engineering, 28(3):1069–1101, 2021

    Gourav Kumar, Sanjeev Jain, and Uday Pratap Singh. Stock market forecasting using computational intelligence: A survey.Archives of computational methods in engineering, 28(3):1069–1101, 2021

  23. [31]

    Routledge London, 2014

    Christian Dunis, Spiros Likothanassis, Andreas Karathanasopoulos, Georgios Sermpinis, and Konstantinos Theofilatos.Computational intelligence techniques for trading and investment. Routledge London, 2014

  24. [32]

    Gaurang Sonkavde, Deepak Sudhakar Dharrao, Anupkumar M Bongale, Sarika T De- okate, Deepak Doreswamy, and Subraya Krishna Bhat. Forecasting stock market prices 29 using machine learning and deep learning models: A systematic review, performance analysis and discussion of impli...

  25. [33]

    Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: a systematic review.IEEE access, 8:185232–185242, 2020

    Audeliano Wolian Li and Guilherme Sousa Bastos. Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: a systematic review.IEEE access, 8:185232–185242, 2020

  26. [34]

    The effect of firm and stock characteristics on stock returns: Stock market crash analysis.The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2(2): 112–124, 2016

    Rizaldi Fauzi and Imam Wahyudi. The effect of firm and stock characteristics on stock returns: Stock market crash analysis.The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2(2): 112–124, 2016

  27. [35]

    What is the fast fourier transform?Proceedings of the IEEE, 55(10): 1664–1674, 1967

    William T Cochran, James W Cooley, David L Favin, Howard D Helms, Reginald A Kaenel, William W Lang, George C Maling, David E Nelson, Charles M Rader, and Peter D Welch. What is the fast fourier transform?Proceedings of the IEEE, 55(10): 1664–1674, 1967

  28. [36]

    Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation

    Matteo Frigo and Steven G. Johnson. The design and implementation of FFTW3. Proceedings of the IEEE, 93(2):216–231, 2005. Special issue on “Program Generation, Optimization, and Platform Adaptation”

  29. [37]

    Study of dynamo action in three dimen- sional magnetohydrodynamic plasma with arnold-beltrami-childress flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09610, 2019

    Rupak Mukherjee and Rajaraman Ganesh. Study of dynamo action in three dimen- sional magnetohydrodynamic plasma with arnold-beltrami-childress flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09610, 2019

  30. [38]

    PhD thesis, PhD thesis, Ph

    Rupak Mukherjee.Turbulence, flows and magnetic field generation in plasmas using a magnetohydrodynamic model. PhD thesis, PhD thesis, Ph. D. thesis (Institute for Plasma Research, India, 2019), 2019. 30

  31. [39]

    Three dimensional pseudo-spectral compress- ible magnetohydrodynamic gpu code for astrophysical plasma simulation

    Rupak Mukherjee, Rajaraman Ganesh, Vinod Saini, Udaya Maurya, Nagavijayalakshmi Vydyanathan, and Bharatkumar Sharma. Three dimensional pseudo-spectral compress- ible magnetohydrodynamic gpu code for astrophysical plasma simulation. In2018 IEEE 25th International Conference on ...

  32. [40]

    Numerical relaxation of a 3d mhd taylor- woltjer state subject to abrupt expansion.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09803, 2018

    Rupak Mukherjee and Rajaraman Ganesh. Numerical relaxation of a 3d mhd taylor- woltjer state subject to abrupt expansion.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.09803, 2018

  33. [41]

    Recurrence in three dimen- sional magnetohydrodynamic plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(2), 2019

    Rupak Mukherjee, Rajaraman Ganesh, and Abhijit Sen. Recurrence in three dimen- sional magnetohydrodynamic plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(2), 2019

  34. [42]

    Nonlinear alfven waves and recurrences in 3d magnetohydrodynamics

    Rupak Mukherjee, Rajaraman Ganesh, and Abhijit Sen. Nonlinear alfven waves and recurrences in 3d magnetohydrodynamics. InAPS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts, volume 2019, pages JO4–013, 2019

  35. [43]

    Numerical study of driven 3d magnetohydrodynamics: dynamos and recurrences

    Rupak Mukherjee, Rajaraman Ganesh, and Abhijit Sen. Numerical study of driven 3d magnetohydrodynamics: dynamos and recurrences. InAPS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts, volume 2018, pages BO8–004, 2018

  36. [44]

    University of Delhi, 2018

    Jagannath Mahapatra, Rupak Mukherjee, Vinod Saini, and Rajaraman Ganesh.Trans- port of test particle in magnetohydrodynamics. University of Delhi, 2018

  37. [45]

    Compressibility effects on quasistationary vortex and transient hole patterns through vortex merger.Physica Scripta, 94(11):115005, 2019

    Rupak Mukherjee, Akanksha Gupta, and Rajaraman Ganesh. Compressibility effects on quasistationary vortex and transient hole patterns through vortex merger.Physica Scripta, 94(11):115005, 2019

  38. [46]

    Quasi- 31 recurrence: a new novel feature observed in 3d-magnetohydrodynamic plasmas

    Shishir Biswas, Rajaraman Ganesh, Rupak Mukherjee, and Abhijit Sen. Quasi- 31 recurrence: a new novel feature observed in 3d-magnetohydrodynamic plasmas. In 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Plasma Physics, 2021

  39. [47]

    A numerical simulation of self-consistent dynamo using a new gpu-based 3d mhd solver, 2020

    Shishir Biswas, Rupak Mukherjee, Naga Vydyanathan, and Rajaraman Ganesh. A numerical simulation of self-consistent dynamo using a new gpu-based 3d mhd solver, 2020

  40. [48]

    Viscoelastic effects on asymmetric two-dimensional vortex patterns in a strongly coupled dusty plasma.Con- tributions to Plasma Physics, 59(8):e201800189, 2019

    Akanksha Gupta, Rupak Mukherjee, and Rajaraman Ganesh. Viscoelastic effects on asymmetric two-dimensional vortex patterns in a strongly coupled dusty plasma.Con- tributions to Plasma Physics, 59(8):e201800189, 2019

  41. [49]

    John Wiley & Sons, 1996

    Edgar E Peters.Chaos and order in the capital markets: a new view of cycles, prices, and market volatility. John Wiley & Sons, 1996

  42. [50]

    Long-term trends and cycles in asean stock markets.Review of Financial Economics, 11(4):299–315, 2002

    Subhash C Sharma and Praphan Wongbangpo. Long-term trends and cycles in asean stock markets.Review of Financial Economics, 11(4):299–315, 2002

  43. [51]

    Detecting the long term cyclical behaviour of the turkish stock market by means of spectral analysis.International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 67, 2011

    C¨ uneyt Akar and Zehra Ba¸ skaya. Detecting the long term cyclical behaviour of the turkish stock market by means of spectral analysis.International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 67, 2011

  44. [52]

    Stock prices: Ramdom vs

    Paul H Cootner. Stock prices: Ramdom vs. systematic changes.Industrial Management Review (pre-1986), 3(2):24, 1962

  45. [53]

    Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3):405–440, 2001

    Paul M Healy and Krishna G Palepu. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature.Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3):405–440, 2001. 32

  46. [54]

    An analysis of capital market through the lens of integral transforms: exploring efficient markets and information asymmetry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06350, 2025

    Kiran Sharma, Abhijit Dutta, and Rupak Mukherjee. An analysis of capital market through the lens of integral transforms: exploring efficient markets and information asymmetry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06350, 2025

  47. [55]

    Towards a theory of hydromagnetic turbulence with higher order fluid moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19704, 2024

    Arindam Saikia and Rupak Mukherjee. Towards a theory of hydromagnetic turbulence with higher order fluid moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.19704, 2024

  48. [56]

    Coherent nonlinear oscillations in magnetohydrodynamic plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(4), 2019

    Rupak Mukherjee, Rajaraman Ganesh, and Abhijit Sen. Coherent nonlinear oscillations in magnetohydrodynamic plasma.Physics of Plasmas, 26(4), 2019. H Appendix H.1 FOURIER TRANSFORM F(ω) = 1√ 2π Z ∞ −∞ f(t)e iωt dt Heref(t) =original function/signalF(ω) = Result of Fourier Trans...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.