Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 82 references

Probing disorder-driven topological phase transitions via topological edge modes with ultracold atoms in Floquet-engineered honeycomb lattices

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Disorder moves the boundary between the anomalous Floquet and Haldane topological phases to higher modulation frequencies, favoring the anomalous regime.

desk verdict Disorder-driven Floquet phase shift is likely real, but the quantitative boundary extraction is not yet airtight. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20154 v1 pith:WCUYYAKB submitted 2025-08-27 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phquant-ph

Alexander Hesse , Johannes Arceri , Moritz Hornung , Christoph Braun , Monika Aidelsburger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-phquant-ph PACS 67.85.-d
keywords topologicaledgemodesanomalousFloquetinsulatorHaldanemodeldisorder-drivenphasetransitionultracoldatomsopticalspeckledisorderengineeringhoneycomblattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a cold-atom experiment showing that disorder changes which topological phase a periodically driven honeycomb lattice realizes. The authors prepare chiral edge modes with a localized Bose-Einstein condensate, add a calibrated optical speckle potential, and track the disappearing chiral signal as the modulation frequency crosses the boundary between the anomalous Floquet and Haldane regimes. They find that the boundary moves to higher frequencies as disorder grows: parameters that without disorder sit in the Haldane regime become anomalous when speckle is added, and strong disorder eventually destroys chiral transport. The result gives experimental evidence that anomalous Floquet topological phases are more resilient to disorder than conventional Chern-type Haldane phases, a step toward phases such as the anomalous Floquet Anderson insulator.

What carries the argument

The working objects are the Floquet winding numbers (W0, Wπ) and the generalized bulk-boundary correspondence C∓ = ±(W0 − Wπ), which separates the anomalous Floquet regime (1, 1, vanishing Chern number) from the Haldane regime (1, 0, Chern number one). The measurement machinery is mode-selective initial-state preparation: a shallow tweezer creates a condensate at zero quasimomentum that couples strongly to the π-gap edge mode of the anomalous regime and weakly to the 0-gap edge mode of the Haldane regime, making chiral motion a regime-selective probe. Disorder is a repulsive optical speckle potential, whose average strength is calibrated in situ by Kapitza-Dirac diffraction of a condensate;

What would settle it

Compute the disorder-averaged Bott index or another real-space invariant on the full six-band lattice used experimentally and compare its transition frequency versus disorder with the chiral-signal disappearance. A disagreement beyond the stated error bars—or a direct quasienergy gap-closing measurement in the disordered lattice that places the boundary at a different frequency—would falsify the claim that the chiral-motion marker tracks the topological transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a periodically driven honeycomb lattice of ultracold potassium atoms, adding a speckle-potential disorder of increasing strength moves the boundary between two Floquet topological phases—the anomalous Floquet regime, with winding numbers (W0, Wπ) = (1, 1), and the Haldane regime, with (1, 0)—to higher modulation frequencies. A shallow optical tweezer prepares a condensate whose overlap with the interface edge mode is large in the anomalous regime and negligible in the Haldane regime, so the presence or absence of chiral center-of-mass motion discriminates the phase. As disorder grows, the frequency at which chiral motion disappears shifts upward, so parameters th

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the disappearance of the chiral center-of-mass signal from the shallow-tweezer initial state marks the true topological phase boundary; if that wavepacket merely loses overlap with the Haldane edge mode while the phase remains topological, the measured shift would misstate the boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a fixed modulation frequency just above the clean transition, increasing disorder should first turn the Haldane regime into the anomalous Floquet regime—the measured re-entrant chiral signal—before eventually driving the system trivial.
  • The disorder strength needed to destroy the chiral signal should be larger in the anomalous regime than in the Haldane regime despite comparable minimal gaps, because the relevant energy scale in the anomalous regime is the Floquet-Brillouin-zone width.
  • Kapitza-Dirac diffraction provides a direct in-situ calibration of average speckle strength, removing the need for conjugate-plane imaging and enabling quantitative disorder studies in cold-atom platforms.
  • The disappearance of the chiral signal distinguishes topological regimes without measuring a band invariant, so the same protocol can be applied to other Floquet topological interfaces with different winding-number pairs.
  • If the shift is generic, disorder-driven transitions between Floquet topological phases can be mapped in cold atoms without relying on translational invariance, opening a route to interacting disordered topological phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measured shift could be tested for generality by repeating the same protocol in other Floquet lattice geometries, such as square or kagome lattices, where different winding-number combinations should show different disorder responses.
  • The shallow-tweezer disappearance marker could be cross-checked by preparing several initial states with known edge-mode overlap; if the extracted transition frequency moves with initial-state width, part of the signal may be an overlap effect rather than a pure phase boundary.
  • The enhanced resilience of the anomalous phase points toward a concrete next experiment: adding interactions or temporal noise near the shifted boundary to search for a many-body localized or anomalously Floquet-Anderson-like regime, which the present non-interacting measurements cannot reach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports an ultracold-atom experiment on chiral edge modes in a Floquet-engineered honeycomb lattice with a controllable optical speckle disorder potential. A BEC is prepared in an optical tweezer next to a hard-wall interface, and the difference in center-of-mass displacement between the two modulation chiralities after 50 modulation periods is used as a probe of chiral edge transport. Two tweezer settings are chosen to enhance the overlap with edge modes in the anomalous Floquet (AF) and Haldane (H) regimes respectively. From frequency scans at fixed disorder strengths, the authors extract a critical frequency by fitting max(−η1ω + η0, 0), and report that disorder shifts the AF–H transition to higher modulation frequencies. They also report a re-entrant chiral signal near the zero-disorder transition and a gradual loss of chiral motion at strong disorder. The disorder strength is calibrated by Kapitza–Dirac diffraction of a BEC against a numerical curve, and the phase-boundary claim is benchmarked against Bott-index calculations and a zero-disorder gap-closing measurement.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is the first cold-atom observation of a disorder-driven topological phase transition between two distinct Floquet topological phases and provides evidence for the enhanced robustness of anomalous Floquet topological matter. The paper has notable strengths: a direct in-situ disorder-strength calibration via Kapitza–Dirac diffraction, state-selective preparation of edge modes via tweezer depth, numerical simulations of edge propagation on finite strips, Bott-index calculations for the disordered two-band model, and a zero-disorder Stückelberg gap-closing benchmark. However, the central quantitative conclusion rests on a finite-time dynamical observable rather than on a direct topological marker, and the supporting Bott-index calculation uses a simplified model with a known frequency offset from the experiment. These issues need to be addressed before the disorder-induced shift can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3a; Fig. 2c,d] The observable used to locate the transition, Δȳ after a fixed 50T (20T in numerics), is a finite-time dynamical quantity and not a topological marker. The paper itself shows in Fig. 2c,d that disorder slows edge transport and induces scattering into the bulk, and states qualitatively similar behavior in the anomalous regime. Therefore the AF-side signal at a given frequency can decrease with disorder even if the topological phase boundary is unchanged. Since the kink fit max(−η1ω + η0, 0) is controlled by the AF-side amplitude and slope, a disorder-induced reduction of edge velocity can move the extrapolated zero crossing upward in frequency, which is exactly the direction claimed. A control is needed that isolates this velocity-suppression effect from a true boundary shift—for example, a numerical simulation with the parameters held deep in the AF phase while disorder is varied, an ana
  2. [S.VII and Fig. 3b] The disorder-shift claim is benchmarked against a Bott index computed in a simplified two-band model that neglects higher bands. That model places the zero-disorder transition at 10.44 kHz, while the 6-band calculation gives 10.92 kHz and the measured gap closing is 11.13(8) kHz. The offset of roughly 0.7 kHz is comparable to the disorder-induced shifts reported in Fig. 3b. As a result, the Bott-index boundary cannot be directly overlaid on the experimental data to validate the shift magnitude, and the red benchmark point at V_D = 0 does not test the disordered regime. The authors should show that the two-band and 6-band (or experimental) models give the same disorder-induced shift, or otherwise quantify the systematic error this model offset introduces into the central claim.
  3. [Fig. 4c] The re-entrant chiral signal at weak disorder near the transition is interpreted as a transition from the Haldane to the anomalous regime. This is not the only possible explanation. At zero disorder the shallow-tweezer initial state has essentially no overlap with the Haldane 0-gap edge mode, which sits at finite quasimomentum K/K'. Weak disorder couples quasimomenta and could increase the feeding of that same Haldane edge mode without any topological transition, producing apparent re-entry. A disorder-averaged calculation of the overlap of the prepared state with the Haldane edge mode, or a measurement of a gap/topological marker across this disorder range, is needed to support the phase-transition interpretation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [S.III] The calibration curve Γ(V_D) = V_D^{a+1}(b V_D^a + c)^{-1} uses the symbol a both as a fit parameter and for the lattice constant elsewhere in the paper. Please rename one of them to avoid confusion.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The notation V_D/h = [0 kHz, 0.46 kHz, ...] is nonstandard; a simple list of values or '0 to 1.39 kHz in steps of 0.46 kHz' would be clearer.
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says 'the two experimental settings illustrated at the top' but the settings shown appear at the bottom of the panel; please check the alignment.
  4. [Main text, Fig. 3 section] The statement that the presence or absence of chiral motion is a 'robust observable for distinguishing between topological regimes' is too strong given the finite evolution time and the demonstrated velocity renormalization. A sentence specifying the operational threshold used to define 'signal vanishing' would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the paper's central claim — that disorder shifts the AF/H transition toward higher modulation frequencies — is not obtained by a self-referential fit. Disorder strengths are calibrated by an independent Kapitza-Dirac diffraction method (S.III): a single-parameter fit of measured decay rates to a numerically computed Γ(VD) curve gives the proportionality constant α. This calibration is independent of the edge-mode observable and of the topological phase boundary. The phase transition itself is located by fitting a kink function max(−η1ω+η0,0) to the fixed-time chirality-resolved COM displacement, which is admittedly a proxy rather than a direct topological invariant. However, the paper benchmarks this proxy against the Bott index for disordered systems and, at zero disorder, against Stückelberg gap-closing measurements (11.13(8) kHz). The numerical edge-state simulations are performed with the same observable but are not fitted to the experimental transition points. Self-citations (Refs. 20, 29, 32) are prior work or collaborative theoretical predictions and are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem; they provide context and independent theoretical support rather than being the sole load-bearing evidence. A real validity concern exists: the paper itself shows in Fig. 2 that disorder slows edge transport and induces bulk scattering, and states that the behavior is 'qualitatively similar' in the anomalous regime. Thus a fixed-time COM signal can shrink with disorder even without a change in the topological phase, which could bias the kink extrapolation. This is a potential confound or missing-support issue, but it is not a by-construction equivalence between an input and a prediction, so it does not constitute circularity. The modest score of 2 reflects the presence of self-citations and the proxy-validation gap, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Floquet-topology results, a simplified tight-binding model of the driven lattice, and a specific observable-choice assumption (chiral COM vanishing) that is benchmarked but not proven equivalent to a topological invariant. No new physical entities are introduced. The main quantitative risk comes from the fitted disorder calibration and the heuristic transition-point extraction.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (disorder calibration constant) = 9.24 kHz/V (+0.93/-0.61 sys, +/-0.25 stat)
    Converts photodiode voltage to average speckle potential strength; all quantitative disorder values VD follow from this single fit.
  • a, b, c (calibration curve parameters) = not explicitly given; fitted to simulated decay rates
    Define the numerical curve Gamma(VD) used to map the measured zeroth-order decay rate to disorder strength.
  • eta1, eta0 (kink fit parameters) = per dataset, not reported
    Used to fit COM distance vs. modulation frequency to extract the phase transition point; the extracted transition shift depends on this heuristic functional form.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Floquet bulk-boundary correspondence relating winding numbers (W0, Wpi) to Chern numbers C∓ = ∓(W0 - Wpi)
    Used in main text to classify the anomalous Floquet (1,1) and Haldane (1,0) regimes.
  • standard math Bott index equals the Chern number in the thermodynamic limit for vanishing disorder
    Used as the topological marker in disordered systems (S.VII), following Loring-Hastings and Toniolo.
  • domain assumption The driven honeycomb lattice is described by a two-band tight-binding model with nearest-neighbor tunneling Ji(t) = A exp(B cos(omega t + phi_i)) + C and negligible next-nearest-neighbor tunneling
    Stated in S.VII; NNN tunneling is about an order of magnitude smaller; higher-band effects are later acknowledged as the source of the frequency offset.
  • domain assumption Disorder can be modeled as static on-site energy offsets sampled from a speckle pattern with correlation length 296 nm
    Used in numerical simulations of the Bott index and edge propagation (S.VII, S.VIII); the experimental speckle has a similar measured correlation length.
  • domain assumption The presence or absence of chiral COM displacement for the shallow-tweezer state marks the topological phase boundary
    This is the central experimental proxy; the paper validates it against the Bott index and gap-closing at zero disorder.
  • domain assumption Finite system sizes (Ns=576 for Bott index, Ns=952-3360 for edge dynamics) are representative of the thermodynamic limit
    Convergence with increasing Ns is shown in Fig. S9 for the Bott index; edge dynamics are run long enough to avoid boundary effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing disorder-driven topological phase transitions via topological edge modes with ultracold atoms in Floquet-engineered honeycomb lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WCUYYAKB

@misc{pith2026250820154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing disorder-driven topological phase transitions via topological edge modes with ultracold atoms in Floquet-engineered honeycomb lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WCUYYAKB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20154}
}
read the original abstract

One of the most fascinating properties of topological phases of matter is their robustness to disorder and imperfections. Although several experimental techniques have been developed to probe the geometric properties of engineered topological Bloch bands with cold atoms, they almost exclusively rely on the translational invariance of the underlying lattice. This prevents direct studies of topology in the presence of disorder, further hindering an extension to disordered interacting topological phases. Here, we identify disorder-driven phase transitions between two distinct Floquet topological phases using the characteristic properties of topological edge modes with ultracold atoms in periodically-driven two-dimensional (2D) optical lattices. Our results constitute an important step towards studying the rich interplay between topology and disorder with cold atoms. Moreover, our measurements confirm that disorder indeed favors the anomalous Floquet topological regime over conventional Hall systems, indicating an enhanced robustness and paving the way towards observing exotic out-of-equilibrium phases such as the anomalous Floquet Anderson insulator.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20154 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup and measurement proto￾col. a Schematic of the periodically-modulated honeycomb lattice generated by interfering three laser beams with vari￾able intensities Ii(t), i = {1, 2, 3} and a = 287 nm. The width of the tunneling bonds indicates their variable strength, mod￾ulated in a chiral manner with frequency ω. b Schematic of the preparation of edge modes at a topological interface: A tightly-focused… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical speckle potential and disorder-induced renormalizaton of edge-mode propagation in the Haldane regime. a Schematic drawing of the optical speckle setup. The uncollimated output of a photonic-crystal-fiber illuminates a small area on a diffuser, scrambling the phase profile of the laser beam. This results in a speckle pattern in the Fourier plane of a lens, which is imaged onto the atoms using two telescopes w… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measurement of the disorder-driven shift of the topological phase transition. a COM distance ∆¯y as a function of modulation frequency. The solid lines are fits of the function max (−η1 ω + η0, 0) (η1 and η0 are free fit parameters) to extract the phase transition point for the experimental (blue) and numerical data (gray). The latter has been simulated based on a simplified two-band model for 20T and was averaged o… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Topological phase diagram for large poten￾tial disorder. a Schematic phase diagram illustrating three different phases: anomalous Floquet, Haldane and topolog￾ically trivial. The orange ellipse indicates the potential re￾gion of an AFAI phase. The dashed lines indicate…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Zheng, A

    J.-H. Zheng, A. Dutta, M. Aidelsburger, and W. Hof- stetter, Floquet topological phase transitions induced by uncorrelated or correlated disorder, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  3. [2]

    Wen, Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Rev

    X.-G. Wen, Colloquium: Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017)

    2017

  4. [3]

    von Klitzing, The quantized Hall effect, Rev

    K. von Klitzing, The quantized Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986)

    work page 1986

  5. [4]

    H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, and A. C. Gossard, The frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S298 (1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [5]

    Aidelsburger, S

    M. Aidelsburger, S. Nascimb` ene, and N. Goldman, Ar- 7 tificial gauge fields in materials and engineered systems, C. R. Phys. 19, 394 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [6]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topo- logical bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    Gross and W

    C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection, Nature Phys. 17, 1316 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics 64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    Weitenberg and J

    C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Tailoring quantum gases by Floquet engineering, Nature Phys. 17, 1342 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic Gauge Fields in Synthetic Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043001 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Mancini, G

    M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani, Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall ribbons, Science 349, 1510 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    L. F. Livi, G. Cappellini, M. Diem, L. Franchi, C. Clivati, M. Frittelli, F. Levi, D. Calonico, J. Catani, M. Ingus- cio, and L. Fallani, Synthetic Dimensions and Spin-Orbit Coupling with an Optical Clock Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 220401 (2016)

    2016

  7. [14]

    Kolkowitz, S

    S. Kolkowitz, S. L. Bromley, T. Bothwell, M. L. Wall, G. E. Marti, A. P. Koller, X. Zhang, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Spin–orbit-coupled fermions in an optical lattice clock, Nature 542, 66 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the Hofstadter Hamiltonian with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    Miyake, G

    H. Miyake, G. A. Siviloglou, C. J. Kennedy, W. C. Bur- ton, and W. Ketterle, Realizing the Harper Hamiltonian with Laser-Assisted Tunneling in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185302 (2013)

    2013

  10. [17]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, Dan Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kauf- man, and M. Greiner, Microscopy of the interacting Harper–Hofstadter model in the two-body limit, Nature 546, 519 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultra- cold fermions, Nature 515, 237 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    Tarnowski, F

    M. Tarnowski, F. N. ¨Unal, N. Fl¨ aschner, B. S. Rem, A. Eckardt, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Measuring topology from dynamics by obtaining the Chern number from a linking number, Nature Commun. 10, 1 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    Wintersperger, C

    K. Wintersperger, C. Braun, F. N. ¨Unal, A. Eckardt, M. D. Liberto, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidels- burger, Realization of an anomalous floquet topologi- cal system with ultracold atoms, Nature Phys. 16, 1058 (2020)

    2020

  14. [21]

    L´ eonard, S

    J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature 619, 495 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    T.-W. Zhou, G. Cappellini, D. Tusi, L. Franchi, J. Par- ravicini, C. Repellin, S. Greschner, M. Inguscio, T. Gia- marchi, M. Filippone, J. Catani, and L. Fallani, Obser- vation of universal Hall response in strongly interacting Fermions, Science 381, 427 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Strongly interacting Meissner phases in large bosonic flux ladders, Nature Physics 21, 895 (2025)

    2025

  17. [24]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measure- ment of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nature Phys. 9, 795 (2013)

    2013

  18. [25]

    L. Duca, T. Li, M. Reitter, I. Bloch, M. Schleier-Smith, and U. Schneider, An Aharonov-Bohm interferometer for determining Bloch band topology, Science 347, 288 (2015)

    2015

  19. [26]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J. T. Barreiro, S. Nascimb` ene, N. R. Cooper, I. Bloch, and N. Goldman, Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms, Nature Phys. 11, 162 (2015)

    2015

  20. [27]

    Fl¨ aschner, B

    N. Fl¨ aschner, B. S. Rem, M. Tarnowski, D. Vogel, D.-S. L¨ uhmann, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Experimen- tal reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band, Science 352, 1091 (2016)

    2016

  21. [28]

    Asteria, D

    L. Asteria, D. Thanh Tran, T. Ozawa, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, N. Fl¨ aschner, K. Sengstock, N. Goldman, and C. Weitenberg, Measuring quantized circular dichro- ism in ultracold topological matter, Nature Phys. 15, 449 (2019)

    2019

  22. [29]

    Braun, R

    C. Braun, R. Saint-Jalm, A. Hesse, J. Arceri, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Real-space detection and manipu- lation of topological edge modes with ultracold atoms, Nature Phys. 20, 1306 (2024)

    2024

  23. [30]

    Titum, N

    P. Titum, N. H. Lindner, M. C. Rechtsman, and G. Re- fael, Disorder-Induced Floquet Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 056801 (2015)

    2015

  24. [31]

    Titum, E

    P. Titum, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Anomalous Floquet-Anderson Insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021013 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Dutta, E

    A. Dutta, E. Sen, J.-H. Zheng, M. Aidelsburger, and W. Hofstetter, Anomalous Floquet Anderson insulator in a continuously driven optical lattice, Phys. Rev. B 109, L121114 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Citro and M

    R. Citro and M. Aidelsburger, Thouless pumping and topology, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 87 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Niu and D

    Q. Niu and D. J. Thouless, Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and many- body interaction, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.17, 2453 (1984)

    1984

  28. [36]

    Cerjan, M

    A. Cerjan, M. Wang, S. Huang, K. P. Chen, and M. C. Rechtsman, Thouless pumping in disordered photonic systems, Light. Sci. Appl. 9, 178 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Nakajima, N

    S. Nakajima, N. Takei, K. Sakuma, Y. Kuno, P. Marra, and Y. Takahashi, Competition and interplay between topology and quasi-periodic disorder in Thouless pump- ing of ultracold atoms, Nature Phys. 17, 844 (2021). 8

    2021

  30. [38]

    Liu, Y.-R

    Y. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, Y.-H. Shi, T. Liu, C. Lu, Y.-Y. Wang, H. Li, T.-M. Li, C.-L. Deng, S.-Y. Zhou, T. Liu, J.-C. Zhang, G.-H. Liang, Z.-Y. Mei, W.-G. Ma, H.-T. Liu, Z.-H. Liu, C.-T. Chen, K. Huang, X. Song, S. P. Zhao, Y. Tian, Z. Xiang, D. Zheng, F. Nori, K. Xu, and H. Fan, ...

    2025

  31. [39]

    I. H. Grinberg, M. Lin, C. Harris, W. A. Benalcazar, C. W. Peterson, T. L. Hughes, and G. Bahl, Robust tem- poral pumping in a magneto-mechanical topological in- sulator, Nature Commun. 11, 974 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, P. Massig- nan, T. L. Hughes, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires, Science 362, 929 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    St¨ utzer, Y

    S. St¨ utzer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, P. Titum, N. H. Lind- ner, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Szameit, Pho- tonic topological Anderson insulators, Nature 560, 461 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    G.-G. Liu, Y. Yang, X. Ren, H. Xue, X. Lin, Y.-H. Hu, H.-x. Sun, B. Peng, P. Zhou, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological Anderson Insulator in Disordered Photonic Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 133603 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Chen, Z.-X

    X.-D. Chen, Z.-X. Gao, X. Cui, H.-C. Mo, W.-J. Chen, R.-Y. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and J.-W. Dong, Realization of Time-Reversal Invariant Photonic Topological Anderson Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 133802 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current- carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982)

    1982

  37. [45]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993)

    1993

  38. [46]

    Bouyer, Quantum gases and optical speckle: a new tool to simulate disordered quantum systems, Rep

    P. Bouyer, Quantum gases and optical speckle: a new tool to simulate disordered quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 062401 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    J. W. Goodman, Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications (SPIE Press, 2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    See Supplemental Material, which includes Refs [80–82], for additional information on the experimental sequence and the disorder setup, calibration and alignment proce- dures, data analysis, error estimates and numerical sim- ulations of the Bott index and edge-mode propagation

  41. [49]

    Cl´ ement, A

    D. Cl´ ement, A. F. Var´ on, M. Hugbart, J. A. Retter, P. Bouyer, L. Sanchez-Palencia, D. M. Gangardt, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and A. Aspect, Suppression of Transport of an Interacting Elongated Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Random Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 170409 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    V. V. Volchkov, M. Pasek, V. Denechaud, M. Mukhtar, A. Aspect, D. Delande, and V. Josse, Measurement of Spectral Functions of Ultracold Atoms in Disordered Po- tentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 060404 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Rubio-Abadal, J.-y

    A. Rubio-Abadal, J.-y. Choi, J. Zeiher, S. Hollerith, J. Rui, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-Body Delocaliza- tion in the Presence of a Quantum Bath, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041014 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous Edge States and the Bulk-Edge Correspon- dence for Periodically Driven Two-Dimensional Systems, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Nathan and M

    F. Nathan and M. S. Rudner, Topological singularities and the general classification of Floquet-Bloch systems, New J. Phys. 17, 125014 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl´ ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of Anderson localiza- tion of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891 (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. In- guscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature 453, 895 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, J. J. Zirbel, and B. De- Marco, Three-Dimensional Anderson Localization of Ul- tracold Matter, Science 334, 66 (2011)

    2011

  50. [58]

    Jendrzejewski, A

    F. Jendrzejewski, A. Bernard, K. M¨ uller, P. Cheinet, V. Josse, M. Piraud, L. Pezz´ e, L. Sanchez-Palencia, A. Aspect, and P. Bouyer, Three-dimensional localiza- tion of ultracold atoms in an optical disordered potential, Nature Phys. 8, 398 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Semeghini, M

    G. Semeghini, M. Landini, P. Castilho, S. Roy, G. Spag- nolli, A. Trenkwalder, M. Fattori, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Measurement of the mobility edge for 3D Anderson localization, Nature Phys. 11, 554 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Lecoutre, Y

    B. Lecoutre, Y. Guo, X. Yu, M. Niranjan, M. Mukhtar, V. V. Volchkov, A. Aspect, and V. Josse, Bichromatic state-dependent disordered potential for Anderson lo- calization of ultracold atoms, Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 218 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Guglielmon and M

    J. Guglielmon and M. C. Rechtsman, Broadband Topo- logical Slow Light through Higher Momentum-Space Winding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 153904 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    J. F. Karcher, S. Gopalakrishnan, and M. C. Rechtsman, Stability of topologically protected slow light against dis- order, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063507 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    T. D. Stanescu, V. Galitski, and S. Das Sarma, Topolog- ical states in two-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013608 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    Buchhold, D

    M. Buchhold, D. Cocks, and W. Hofstetter, Effects of smooth boundaries on topological edge modes in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 85, 063614 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. Dalibard, A. Dauphin, F. Gerbier, M. Lewenstein, P. Zoller, and I. B. Spielman, Direct imaging of topological edge states in cold-atom systems, PNAS 11, 6736 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    T. A. Loring and M. B. Hastings, Disordered topological insulators via C*-algebras, EPL 92, 67004 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    Toniolo, On the Bott index of unitary matrices on a finite torus, Lett

    D. Toniolo, On the Bott index of unitary matrices on a finite torus, Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Zenesini, D

    A. Zenesini, D. Ciampini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Observation of St¨ uckelberg oscillations in accelerated op- tical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 82, 065601 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    Kling, T

    S. Kling, T. Salger, C. Grossert, and M. Weitz, Atomic Bloch-Zener Oscillations and St¨ uckelberg Interferometry in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 215301 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    Kundu, M

    A. Kundu, M. Rudner, E. Berg, and N. H. Lindner, Quantized large-bias current in the anomalous Floquet- Anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. B 101, 041403 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    B. Wang, M. Aidelsburger, J. Dalibard, A. Eckardt, and N. Goldman, Cold-atom elevator: From edge-state in- jection to the preparation of fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 163402 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, S. Huh, C. Schweizer, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Local Read- 9 out and Control of Current and Kinetic Energy Opera- tors in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 063401 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    C. I. Timms, L. M. Sieberer, and M. H. Kolodrubetz, Quantized Floquet Topology with Temporal Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 270601 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Zheng, C

    P.-P. Zheng, C. I. Timms, and M. H. Kolodrubetz, Anomalous Floquet-Anderson insulator with quasiperi- odic temporal noise, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094207 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    Nathan, D

    F. Nathan, D. Abanin, E. Berg, N. H. Lindner, and M. S. Rudner, Anomalous Floquet insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 195133 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackerm¨ uller, J. P. Ronzheimer, S. Will, S. Braun, T. Best, I. Bloch, E. Demler, S. Mandt, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Fermionic transport and out-of- equilibrium dynamics in a homogeneous Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature Phys. 8, 213 (2012)

    2012

  69. [77]

    J. P. Ronzheimer, M. Schreiber, S. Braun, S. S. Hodg- man, S. Langer, I. P. McCulloch, F. Heidrich-Meisner, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Expansion Dynamics of In- teracting Bosons in Homogeneous Lattices in One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 205301 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Nathan, M

    F. Nathan, M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and G. Refael, Quantized Magnetization Density in Period- ically Driven Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 186801 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    L. P. Gavensky, N. Goldman, and G. Usaj, Quantized Chern-Simons Axion Coupling in Anomalous Floquet Systems, arXiv:2506.20719 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  72. [80]

    J. H. Huckans, I. B. Spielman, B. L. Tolra, W. D. Phillips, and J. V. Porto, Quantum and classical dynamics of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a large-period optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A 80 (2009)

    2009

  73. [81]

    Gadway, D

    B. Gadway, D. Pertot, R. Reimann, M. G. Cohen, and D. Schneble, Analysis of Kapitza-Dirac diffraction pat- terns beyond the Raman-Nath regime, Optics Express 17, 19173 (2009)

    2009

  74. [82]

    Reinaudi, T

    G. Reinaudi, T. Lahaye, Z. Wang, and D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, Strong saturation absorption imaging of dense clouds of ultracold atoms, Opt. Lett. 32, 3143 (2007). 10 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL S.I Experimental sequence 10 S.II Disorder potential 10 S.III Disorder calibration 11 S.IV Tw...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.