Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

RS CVn binaries show a single radio luminosity–period scaling from 144 MHz to 3000 MHz, the paper argues; if right, binary separation, not individual activity, sets their radio output.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

RS CVn binaries show a radio luminosity-period correlation that appears the same from 144 MHz to 3 GHz, hinting at a common emission source.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection New period catalog and a plausible L_R-P correlation, but the 'frequency-independent' claim is asserted, not tested. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.20393 v2 pith:UOOAWZ4T submitted 2025-08-28 astro-ph.SR

The frequency-independent radio luminosity -- orbital/rotational period relation of RS CVn stars

Qichen Huang , Biwei Jiang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords RS Canum Venaticorum starsradio luminosityorbital periodgyrosynchrotron emissionelectron cyclotron maser emissionTESS light curvesbinary starsstellar activity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that RS CVn binary stars obey one frequency-independent relation between their maximum radio luminosity and their orbital/rotation period, even though their radio light at megahertz and gigahertz frequencies has been attributed to two different mechanisms. Using a compiled sample of confirmed radio-emitting RS CVn systems, the authors derive periods for 42 of 60 sources from TESS light curves and find a strong positive correlation between log L_R and log P (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.698, p ≈ 4e-7). Adding 12 low-frequency sources keeps the correlation (PCC = 0.665). If correct, a single scaling relation links radio output to the binary orbital scale, and the separation between the two stars—rather than the activity of one component—becomes the primary control on luminosity. That would reframe where and how the radio emission is generated, with consequences for models of magnetically active binaries.

Core claim

The paper reports a positive linear correlation between the logarithm of maximum radio luminosity and the logarithm of orbital/rotation period in RS CVn binaries, with PCC = 0.698 (p = 3.95e-7) for 42 sources from the Sydney Radio Star Catalogue, and PCC = 0.665 (p = 3e-8) when 12 sources with 144 MHz detections are added. Because RS CVn stars are tidally locked, the rotation period derived from TESS photometry is taken to be the orbital period. The authors state that the correlation persists across frequencies from 144 MHz to 3000 MHz, noting that the 144 MHz points sit slightly below the GHz trend but do not break the relation, despite the standard view that GHz emission is gyrosynchrotron

What carries the argument

The central object is the empirical log L_R–log P diagram built from maximum radio flux densities in the SRSC and orbital/rotation periods derived from TESS light curves. Tidal locking identifies the rotation period with the orbital period; Kepler's third law then links period and total mass to the semi-major axis, so the period–luminosity correlation can be read as a separation–luminosity correlation. The statistical engine is the Pearson correlation coefficient, checked against an MCMC simulation of 1000 synthetic samples to rule out chance given a 1 mJy detection threshold.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the largest flux density recorded for a star at any frequency, telescope, or epoch can be pooled into one 'maximum radio luminosity' per star; if the 144 MHz and GHz maxima come from different flaring states or mechanisms, the combined correlation could be an artifact of mixing them.

What would settle it

Monitor a sample of RS CVn binaries quasi-simultaneously at 144 MHz and at 1–6 GHz over several orbits and compare their peak luminosities; if the 144 MHz peaks lie off the log L_R–log P line defined by GHz peaks by more than the scatter, the claimed frequency independence is refuted. A simpler check: recompute the correlation using only contemporaneous points and see whether a PCC near 0.7 survives.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • One scaling relation describes the maximum radio luminosity of RS CVn binaries over 144–3000 MHz, so low- and high-frequency emission regimes are not independent.
  • Radio luminosity increases with orbital period; longer-period systems are radio-brighter, with PCC = 0.698 for 42 sources (p ≈ 4e-7).
  • Binary separation correlates with radio luminosity (PCC = 0.719) more strongly than period or mass, suggesting the magnetic interaction between the two stars sets the radio output.
  • Secondary-star mass and Rossby number do not correlate with radio luminosity, so the secondary star contributes little and individual stellar activity is not the main driver.
  • The results challenge the working assumption that gyrosynchrotron (GHz) and electron-cyclotron maser (MHz) emission in RS CVn systems are governed by entirely separate physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the separation–luminosity link is causal, then radio luminosity should track binary separation in other close active binaries, such as Algol-type or contact binaries; that is an extension the paper does not test.
  • A direct test of the frequency-independence claim would be quasi-simultaneous 144 MHz and 1–6 GHz monitoring of the same systems; correlated flaring across bands would strongly support a common emitting region.
  • The use of per-source maximum flux densities likely biases the sample toward flaring states, so the slope of the relation may change if quiescent or strictly simultaneous luminosities were used instead.
  • The relation could be repurposed as a distance or period estimator for unresolved RS CVn-like binaries, provided its intrinsic scatter and selection effects are characterized first.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a positive correlation between maximum radio luminosity and orbital/rotational period for RS CVn binaries. Using 42 RS CVn systems from the Sydney Radio Star Catalogue with periods derived from TESS light curves, the authors find PCC = 0.698 (p = 3.95e-7) between log10 L_R and log10 P. Adding 12 low-frequency (144 MHz) sources from Toet et al. (2021) yields PCC = 0.665 (p = 3e-8). The paper interprets the lack of obvious frequency clustering in the period-luminosity plane as evidence that the relation is frequency-independent across 144-3000 MHz, despite acknowledging a systematic offset of the 144 MHz points. It further derives stellar parameters for 8 dwarf-dwarf systems and combines these with literature values to report correlations between radio luminosity and primary mass, total mass, and binary semi-major axis (PCC = 0.663, 0.663, 0.719), interpreting the semi-major axis correlation as evidence that binary separation is a primary driver of radio emission. The paper also presents an MCMC simulation intended to show that the observed correlation is unlikely to arise from observational selection.

Significance. If established, a single frequency-independent L_R-P relation for RS CVn stars would be physically interesting because it would connect gyrosynchrotron emission at GHz frequencies with electron cyclotron maser emission at MHz frequencies, challenging the expectation that these mechanisms are governed by different scaling laws. The TESS-based period derivation is a useful contribution, and the comparison with Toet et al. (2021) is a reasonable attempt to broaden the sample. However, the central claim of frequency independence is not actually tested in the manuscript: the reported pooled Pearson coefficients do not distinguish between a single relation and two parallel but offset relations. The semi-major axis result is also largely a mathematical consequence of Kepler's Third Law given the already-established L_R-P correlation, as the authors partly acknowledge. The paper is therefore not yet ready for publication in its current form; the main scientific claims need either stronger statistical support or more cautious framing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §3.2] The claim of a 'frequency-independent' relation is not statistically supported. Section 3.2 itself states that 'Only the 144 MHz data displays a slight systematic offset toward lower values compared to other frequencies at similar periods.' This offset, if real, means the normalization of the L_R-P relation depends on frequency. The pooled PCC values (0.698 and 0.665) only test whether some correlation exists in the combined sample; they do not test whether the 144 MHz and GHz subsamples share the same slope and intercept. The authors should fit frequency as a covariate, compare fits to the two subsamples (e.g., an F-test or bootstrap of the offset), and report the significance of the 144 MHz offset. Without such a test, the title and abstract overstate the finding.
  2. [§2.2 and §3.1] Using the maximum flux density from heterogeneous frequencies, epochs, and surveys as a single radio luminosity per source is problematic for the frequency-independence claim. For the 12 Toet et al. (2021) sources, the only data are at 144 MHz, whereas most SRSC sources have GHz measurements. If the radio spectra are not flat, the 'maximum luminosity' of a 144 MHz-only source is not directly comparable to the maximum luminosity of a GHz-only source. The analysis should either compare sources observed at the same frequency, use spectral indices to normalize luminosities, or explicitly model frequency as a covariate. At minimum, the authors should test whether the correlation holds among the GHz sub-sample alone and among the 144 MHz sub-sample alone.
  3. [§4.2.2 and Eq. (P^2 = a^3/M_tot)] The interpretation that binary separation has the 'strongest correlation' with radio luminosity is not justified. The semi-major axis a is computed from log a = (2 log P + log M_tot)/3 via Kepler's Third Law, and log P already correlates with L_R. Therefore a positive PCC between log a and L_R is expected even if M_tot is completely uncorrelated with L_R. The text acknowledges this mathematical coupling but still concludes that 'binary separation may be a more critical determinant' and that the a-correlation is 'stronger.' To support this claim, the authors should perform a partial correlation or regression of L_R against log a while controlling for log P and log M_tot, or otherwise show that a adds predictive power beyond P alone. As written, the conclusion is circular.
  4. [§3.3] The MCMC null test is suggestive but not robust to the assumed model. The simulations adopt a normal luminosity distribution with mean 10^18.5 and sigma 10^0.5, a normal period distribution with mean 10^0.5 and sigma 10^0.2, and a 1 mJy detection threshold, but no sensitivity analysis is presented. The claim that 'only 0.003% of simulated datasets achieved PCC >= 0.5' depends on these choices. The authors should vary the assumed distributions, thresholds, and sample size, and report how the false-positive rate changes. This is important because the null test is used to argue that the correlation is not an artifact of selection bias.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2 and §3.3] The text refers to 'Figure 2 (c)' for the MCMC PCC distribution, but the figure as printed has only panels (a) and (b). The caption describes the PCC distribution in panel (b). Please renumber consistently.
  2. [§4.2 and Table 2] The sample sizes for the mass and semi-major axis correlations are unclear. The text says 'combined analysis of 21 RS CVn systems,' but only 18 systems have semi-major axes in Figure 4(c), and Table 2 contains rows with no data (e.g., BQ CVn). Report the exact n for each PCC and give p-values, since the quoted PCCs alone are not sufficient.
  3. [Eq. (1)] The eclipse-depth ratio formula uses F_b, F_e, F_m, F'_b, F'_e, F'_m without defining these quantities explicitly in the text. Please define them in words or a short table.
  4. [Throughout] The package name is inconsistently written as 'PYSSED' and 'PySSED'; use one form. Also, check for minor typographical issues such as 'o ffers' and 'di fferences' that appear in the LaTeX source.
  5. [Table 1] For BH CVn, the integrated and peak flux density errors are listed as dashes. If these are unavailable, say so in the table notes rather than leaving ambiguous dashes.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Binary-separation correlation is a Keplerian transform of already-correlated period and mass; the 'frequency-independent' claim is further weakened by the paper's own 144 MHz offset.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4.1.4 and Section 4.2.2]
    "In this formulation, both logarithmic terms on the left side (log10 P and log10 Mtot) exhibit positive linear correlations with radio luminosity. Consequently, the logarithmic semi-major axis (log10 a) naturally demonstrates a positive linear correlation with radio luminosity."

    The semi-major axis is not an independent observable; it is defined by Kepler's Third Law as a = (P^2 Mtot)^(1/3), so log10 a = (2/3) log10 P + (1/3) log10 Mtot. Since the paper had already established that log10 P and log10 Mtot each correlate with log10 L_R, the correlation of log10 a follows mathematically from those inputs. Reporting PCC = 0.719 for log10 a and then interpreting it as 'binary separation may be a more critical determinant' treats a derived linear combination as a new physical variable. The strength of the a-correlation carries no information beyond the previously established P and Mtot correlations; it is a transformation, not an independent test.

full rationale

The central L_R–log P correlation is derived from independent measurements: SRSC max flux densities, Gaia distances, and TESS periods. The MCMC null test and the addition of 12 Toet et al. (2021) sources are genuine external checks, so the main period–luminosity claim is not circular. The only reduction-by-construction occurs in Section 4.2.2: log a is defined from log P and log Mtot via Kepler's Third Law, both of which already correlate with log L_R; the reported PCC = 0.719 for a is thus a mathematical transformation of those correlations, not an independent empirical test. The paper even states that log a 'naturally demonstrates' the correlation for this reason, yet then uses the same number to claim separation is the 'more critical determinant.' That interpretive leap is circular in the sense that the new variable carries no information beyond its inputs. Separately, Section 3.2's admission of a systematic 144 MHz offset contradicts the 'frequency-independent' title, but this is an internal-consistency/statistical-evidence problem, not a circularity, so it does not contribute to the score beyond noting the central claim is less robust than presented. Overall score 6 reflects one partially circular secondary claim while the primary empirical correlation retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central correlation uses no fitted free parameters beyond the survey choices, but the MCMC null test requires ad hoc population distributions, and the parameter analysis (8 dwarf systems) rests on several unvalidated empirical relations and hand-chosen thresholds. The separation is mathematically derived from P and M_tot, so it adds no new degrees of freedom.

free parameters (6)
  • MCMC null-model luminosity distribution = log-normal with mean 10^18.5 erg/s/Hz, sigma 0.5 dex (Section 3.3)
    Chosen by hand for the null-hypothesis simulation; no justification beyond matching the observed range, and not constrained by data.
  • MCMC null-model period distribution = log-normal with mean 10^0.5 days, sigma 0.2 dex (Section 3.3)
    Ad hoc input distribution for simulated periods; not derived from a stellar population model.
  • Detection threshold = 1 mJy (Section 3.3)
    Adopted for the MCMC simulation to mimic survey threshold; the actual SRSC sensitivity varies by survey.
  • Distance range = 27-385 pc (Section 3.3)
    Chosen from the observed sample's range; used in simulation.
  • Dwarf-system luminosity cut = 3 L_sun (Section 4.1.2)
    Hand-chosen threshold to separate dwarf-dwarf systems; affects which 8 systems are analyzed.
  • Periodogram signal-to-noise threshold = S/N > 10 (Section 2.3)
    Chosen by hand to accept periodic signals; standard but not justified for this sample.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption RS CVn components are tidally locked, so rotation period equals orbital period.
    Invoked in Section 2.3 to equate TESS rotation periods with orbital periods for the correlation and for Kepler's-law separation.
  • domain assumption The binary is unresolved, so Gaia/TESS photometry and PySSED luminosity represent the combined system, with luminosity remaining robust despite unreliable temperature/radius.
    Section 4.1.1; the total luminosity is used as if the system were a single source.
  • domain assumption Eclipse depth ratio is proportional to the component temperature ratio (via Stefan-Boltzmann law).
    Section 4.1.1; the paper states this without accounting for differing radii or a fourth-power law, making the temperature-ratio determination approximate.
  • domain assumption Eker et al. (2018) empirical mass-luminosity, mass-temperature, and mass-radius relations for dwarf stars between 0.179 and 31 solar masses apply to these components.
    Section 4.1.2; used to convert L_tot and temperature ratio into masses and radii.
  • domain assumption Wright et al. (2011) relationship between convective turnover time and stellar mass applies, and Ro computed from it is a valid activity indicator.
    Section 4.1.3; used to compute Rossby numbers for 35 components.
  • standard math Kepler's Third Law in the form P^2 = a^3/M_tot is valid for these binaries.
    Section 4.1.4; used to derive semi-major axes, with units implicit.
  • ad hoc to paper The maximum flux density across all epochs/bands is a meaningful measure of each source's radio luminosity.
    Section 2.2; the choice of maximum rather than median/quiescent flux is not justified and affects the correlation.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The frequency-independent radio luminosity -- orbital/rotational period relation of RS CVn stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOOAWZ4T

@misc{pith2026250820393,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The frequency-independent radio luminosity -- orbital/rotational period relation of RS CVn stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOOAWZ4T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20393}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Radio emissions from RS CVn objects exhibit distinct characteristics at low and high frequencies, widely attributed to differing radiation mechanisms. The disparate processes of high-frequency gyrosynchrotron and low-frequency electron cyclotron maser emissions have traditionally suggested an absence of correlation in their radio luminosities. Our study presents a frequency-independent linear correlation between radio luminosity ($L_R$) and orbital/rotational periods ($P$) in RS CVn binaries. Analyzing the Sydney Radio Star Catalogue (SRSC) data, we derived orbital periods for 42 of 60 RS CVn sources using TESS light curves, revealing a strong positive correlation (PCC = 0.698, $P$ = 3.95e-7) between $\log_{10}L_R$ and $\log_{10}P$. This correlation remains across frequencies from 144-3000 MHz, showing uniform luminosity behavior. By combining light curve analysis with stellar mass-radius-luminosity relationships, we calculated parameters like binary mass, primary/secondary mass, Rossby number, and binary separation for eight RS CVn systems. The results show a notable correlation between radio luminosity and binary mass, primary mass, and separation (PCC = 0.663, 0.663, 0.719), with separation showing the strongest correlation. This suggests the radio emission may largely originate from the binary components' interaction, challenging existing models of RS CVn radio emission mechanisms and offering insights into the individual versus collective origins of these emissions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20393 by Biwei Jiang, Qichen Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: 60 RS CVn stars placed in a Gaia third data release (DR3) color–magnitude diagram (CMD). Gray points are 2-minute cadence observation targets of TESS sectors 1 and 2 which also contained in Gaia DR3. All distance data were provided by Bailer-Jones et al. (2021). Colors indicated the maximum radio luminosity of RS CVn stars. distances from Bailer-Jones et al. (2021) based on Gaia EDR3, the G-band photometry… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a)Upper panel: Maximum radio luminosity - Rotation period correlation, where circles represent sources from SRSC and black triangles represent sources from Toet et al. (2021). The red solid line (LF-Thiswork) represents the linear fit to 42 RS CVn stars in our work and the blue solid line (LF-Toet+2021) represents the linear fit to 54 RS CVns which included 12 sources from Toet et al. (2021). The dashed l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Light curves for (a) TIC 42705187 (2.13-day period) and (b) TIC 28619091 (4.9-day period). For each source, upper panels show original light curves; lower panels display results after periodic signal removal (strongest signal removed iteratively 4 times for (a), once for (b)). Left panels present time-series data; right panels show phase-folded results. Eclipse depth measurements used the lower-right panel… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Relationship between stellar mass and maximum radio luminosity. Red triangles denote secondary stars, blue circles primary stars, and yellow squares total binary mass. Colored dashed lines show linear fits for each mass category. (b) Relationship between Rossby number (activity indicator) and maximum radio luminosity, with color coding indicating stellar mass. The dashed line at Ro = 0.13 marks the ste… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    """"""Z `</_]w݅p8 lٲC

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    A., et al

    Anthony, F., N \'u \ n ez, A., Ag \"u eros, M. A., et al. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 257

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, , 161, 147, 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  6. [6]

    J., & G \"u del, M

    Beasley, A. J., & G \"u del, M. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 529, 961

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    O., & Gudel , M

    Benz , A. O., & Gudel , M. 1993, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 182, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#182, 46.06

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    O., & G \"u del , M

    Benz , A. O., & G \"u del , M. 2010, , 48, 241, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757 2010

  9. [9]

    Berdyugina , S. V. 2005, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 2, 8, 10.12942/lrsp-2005-8

    doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-8 2005

  10. [10]

    F., Bartel , N., Lebach , D

    Bietenholz , M. F., Bartel , N., Lebach , D. E., et al. 2012, , 201, 7, 10.1088/0067-0049/201/1/7

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/201/1/7 2012

  11. [11]

    V., Bahar , E., Montes , D., et al

    S enavc , H. V., Bahar , E., Montes , D., et al. 2018, , 479, 875, 10.1093/mnras/sty1469

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1469 2018

  12. [12]

    2022, , 516, 5003, 10.1093/mnras/stac2190

    Debski , B. 2022, , 516, 5003, 10.1093/mnras/stac2190

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2190 2022

  13. [13]

    A., Simon , T., & Linsky , J

    Drake , S. A., Simon , T., & Linsky , J. L. 1989, , 71, 905, 10.1086/191402

    work page doi:10.1086/191402 1989

  14. [14]

    1992, , 82, 311, 10.1086/191717

    ---. 1992, , 82, 311, 10.1086/191717

    work page doi:10.1086/191717 1992

  15. [15]

    N., Pritchard , J., Murphy , T., et al

    Driessen , L. N., Pritchard , J., Murphy , T., et al. 2024, , 41, e084, 10.1017/pasa.2024.72

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.72 2024

  16. [16]

    A., & Hall , D

    Eaton , J. A., & Hall , D. S. 1979, , 227, 907, 10.1086/156800

    work page doi:10.1086/156800 1979

  17. [17]

    Eggleton , P. P. 2012, Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 29, 145, 10.5140/JASS.2012.29.2.145

    work page doi:10.5140/jass.2012.29.2.145 2012

  18. [18]

    2018, , 479, 5491, 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

    Eker , Z., Bak s , V., Bilir , S., et al. 2018, , 479, 5491, 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1834 2018

  19. [19]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 908

    Fang, X.-S., Zhao, G., Zhao, J.-K., & Bharat Kumar, Y. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 476, 908

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    M., & Rib \'o , M

    Garc \' a-S \'a nchez , J., Paredes , J. M., & Rib \'o , M. 2003, , 403, 613, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030361

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030361 2003

  21. [21]

    2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    G \"u del , M. 2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    work page arXiv 2002

  22. [22]

    Guedel , M., & Benz , A. O. 1993, , 405, L63, 10.1086/186766

    doi:10.1086/186766 1993

  23. [23]

    2022, , 517, 1928, 10.1093/mnras/stac2811

    Guo , D.-F., Li , K., Liu , F., et al. 2022, , 517, 1928, 10.1093/mnras/stac2811

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2811 2022

  24. [24]

    Hall , D. S. 1976, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 60, IAU Colloq. 29: Multiple Periodic Variable Stars, ed. W. S. Fitch , 287, 10.1007/978-94-010-1175-4_15

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1175-4_15 1976

  25. [25]

    X., Vanderburg , A., P \'a l , A., et al

    Huang , C. X., Vanderburg , A., P \'a l , A., et al. 2020 a , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 204, 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e 2020

  26. [26]

    2020 b , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 206, 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d

    ---. 2020 b , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 206, 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d 2020

  27. [27]

    2024, , 977, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b25

    Huang , Q., Jiang , B., Zhang , Z., & Zijlstra , A. 2024, , 977, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b25

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b25 2024

  28. [28]

    W., & Wilson , R

    Kang , Y. W., & Wilson , R. E. 1989, , 97, 848, 10.1086/115031

    work page doi:10.1086/115031 1989

  29. [29]

    Kuijpers , J., & van der Hulst , J. M. 1985, , 149, 343

    work page 1985

  30. [30]

    2022, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 6, 236, 10.3847/2515-5172/aca158

    Kunimoto , M., Tey , E., Fong , W., et al. 2022, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 6, 236, 10.3847/2515-5172/aca158

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/aca158 2022

  31. [31]

    2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 234, 10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    Kunimoto , M., Huang , C., Tey , E., et al. 2021, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 5, 234, 10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0

    doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0 2021

  32. [32]

    A., Cox , N

    McDonald , I., Zijlstra , A. A., Cox , N. L. J., et al. 2024, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 3, 89, 10.1093/rasti/rzae005

    doi:10.1093/rasti/rzae005 2024

  33. [33]

    H., & Mutel , R

    Morris , D. H., & Mutel , R. L. 1988, , 95, 204, 10.1086/114629

    work page doi:10.1086/114629 1988

  34. [34]

    G., Collins , K

    Paegert , M., Stassun , K. G., Collins , K. A., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.04778, 10.48550/arXiv.2108.04778

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.04778 2021

  35. [35]

    M., Mutel , R

    Peterson , W. M., Mutel , R. L., G \"u del , M., & Goss , W. M. 2010, , 463, 207, 10.1038/nature08643

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08643 2010

  36. [36]

    2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 502, 5438

    Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., Zic, A., et al. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 502, 5438

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Reiners , A., Sch \"u ssler , M., & Passegger , V. M. 2014, , 794, 144, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/144

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/144 2014

  38. [38]

    F., & Becciani , U

    Rodon \`o , M., Lanza , A. F., & Becciani , U. 2001, , 371, 174, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010324

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010324 2001

  39. [39]

    F., Maeder , A., Meynet , G., et al

    Song , H. F., Maeder , A., Meynet , G., et al. 2013, , 556, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321870

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321870 2013

  40. [40]

    G., Oelkers, R

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 156, 102

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    G., & Fekel , F

    Strassmeier , K. G., & Fekel , F. C. 1990, , 230, 389

    work page 1990

  42. [42]

    2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 654, A21

    Toet, S., Vedantham, H., Callingham, J., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 654, A21

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    K., Callingham , J

    Vedantham , H. K., Callingham , J. R., Shimwell , T. W., et al. 2022, , 926, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5115

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5115 2022

  44. [44]

    M., & Franciosini , E

    White , S. M., & Franciosini , E. 1995, , 444, 342, 10.1086/175609

    work page doi:10.1086/175609 1995

  45. [45]

    J., Drake, J

    Wright, N. J., Drake, J. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Henry, G. W. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 743, 48

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    2020, , 492, 3647, 10.1093/mnras/staa063

    Xiang , Y., Gu , S., Wolter , U., et al. 2020, , 492, 3647, 10.1093/mnras/staa063

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa063 2020

  47. [47]

    W., Vedantham, H

    Yiu, T. W., Vedantham, H. K., Callingham, J. R., & G \"u nther, M. N. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A3

    work page 2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.