pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.21177 · v2 · pith:N7ULYEVEnew · submitted 2025-08-28 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

Coherent dynamics in soft-threshold integrate-and-fire networks

Lauren Forbes , Jared Grossman , Montie Avery , Ryan Goh , Gabriel Koch Ocker This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 22:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords integrate-and-fire neuronsmean-field theorybifurcationssynaptic delaysTuring patternsspatiotemporal dynamicsneural networksstochastic models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Synaptic delays and spatial coupling patterns generate oscillations, bumps, and waves in networks of noisy spiking neurons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a deterministic mean-field description for networks of soft-threshold integrate-and-fire neurons that incorporate stochastic spike emission. This approximation is used to analyze how the spatial arrangement and timing of synaptic connections affect large-scale activity patterns. It identifies specific bifurcations that generate uniform oscillations from delays, localized activity bumps from opposing local and long-range connections, and moving or standing waves when both delays and mixed spatial connections are present. These theoretical patterns are then shown to appear in direct numerical simulations of the full stochastic network model. Such results indicate that relatively simple connectivity rules can organize coherent population dynamics in noisy neural systems.

Core claim

In the mean-field theory, synaptic delays give rise to uniform oscillations across the population through a subcritical Hopf bifurcation of the stationary uniform equilibrium; with local excitation and long-range inhibition the network undergoes a Turing bifurcation resulting in a stationary bump; when the coupling has both delays, local inhibition, and long range excitation, the network undergoes a Turing-Hopf bifurcation leading to spatiotemporal dynamics such as standing and traveling waves; all predictions are confirmed in simulations of the underlying stochastic model.

What carries the argument

The deterministic mean-field approximation of the population dynamics, which permits linear stability analysis to detect Hopf, Turing, and Turing-Hopf bifurcations induced by delays and spatial connectivity structures.

If this is right

  • Uniform population oscillations arise solely from the presence of synaptic delays via a subcritical Hopf bifurcation.
  • Stationary bumps of activity form when excitation is local and inhibition is long-range through a Turing bifurcation.
  • Spatiotemporal patterns including standing and traveling waves emerge from the combination of delays with local inhibition and long-range excitation via a Turing-Hopf bifurcation.
  • More complex spatiotemporal dynamics appear when multiple instabilities are simultaneously excited.
  • The mean-field predictions hold in simulations of the stochastic spiking model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bifurcation framework could be applied to predict how varying delay distributions or connection kernels influence pattern formation in larger or heterogeneous networks.
  • This analysis underscores how connectivity structure alone can generate diverse brain-like rhythms and localized activity states.
  • Extensions incorporating slow variables such as adaptation might show how these fast patterns couple to longer-term changes in neural activity.

Load-bearing premise

The deterministic mean-field approximation of the population dynamics accurately captures the effects of spatial and temporal structure of synaptic interactions in the stochastic soft-threshold integrate-and-fire network.

What would settle it

Stochastic simulations of the network with synaptic delays chosen to place the system near a predicted subcritical Hopf bifurcation but without producing the expected uniform population oscillations would falsify the mean-field claim.

read the original abstract

We study bifurcations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with stochastic spike emission, focusing on the effects of the spatial and temporal structure of the synaptic interactions. Using a deterministic mean-field approximation of the population dynamics, we characterize spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal patterns of macroscopic activity. In the mean-field theory, synaptic delays give rise to uniform oscillations across the population through a subcritical Hopf bifurcation of the stationary uniform equilibrium. With local excitation and long-range inhibition the network undergoes a Turing bifurcation, resulting in a localized area of sustained activity, or stationary bump. When the coupling has both delays, local inhibition, and long range excitation, the network undergoes a Turing-Hopf bifurcation leading to spatiotemporal dynamics, such as standing and traveling waves. When multiple instabilities are excited, we observe other complex spatiotemporal dynamics. We confirm all these predictions of the mean-field theory in simulations of the underlying stochastic model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This paper develops a mean-field theory for soft-threshold integrate-and-fire neuron networks to study how the spatial and temporal structure of synaptic interactions leads to bifurcations and coherent macroscopic activity patterns. In the mean-field limit, synaptic delays trigger a subcritical Hopf bifurcation resulting in uniform oscillations, local excitation combined with long-range inhibition produces a Turing bifurcation yielding stationary activity bumps, and the combination of delays with local inhibition and long-range excitation induces a Turing-Hopf bifurcation leading to standing and traveling waves. The authors report that these predictions are verified through simulations of the full stochastic network model.

Significance. Should the deterministic mean-field approximation prove accurate in capturing the effects of delays and spatial couplings in the stochastic setting, the results would offer a systematic way to predict and classify coherent dynamics in neural populations. The approach of starting from mean-field equations and testing against independent stochastic simulations, along with the apparent absence of free parameters in the derivations, strengthens the potential impact by providing testable predictions for neural pattern formation.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The statement that simulations of the underlying stochastic model confirm all mean-field predictions lacks any quantitative error measures (e.g., relative deviation in critical delay values for the Hopf threshold or spatial width metrics for bumps), which is load-bearing for the central claim that the deterministic approximation correctly locates the instabilities and patterns.
  2. Mean-field derivation and bifurcation analysis: The closure of the population dynamics at the mean level is invoked to derive the subcritical Hopf, Turing, and Turing-Hopf conditions, but no explicit bound or check is provided on the neglect of higher-order moments and finite-size fluctuations near the thresholds when both delays and spatially heterogeneous couplings are present.
minor comments (1)
  1. Figure legends and simulation descriptions would benefit from explicit statements of network size, number of realizations, and how bifurcation parameters were extracted from the stochastic trajectories.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation and validation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The statement that simulations of the underlying stochastic model confirm all mean-field predictions lacks any quantitative error measures (e.g., relative deviation in critical delay values for the Hopf threshold or spatial width metrics for bumps), which is load-bearing for the central claim that the deterministic approximation correctly locates the instabilities and patterns.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error measures would provide stronger support for the claim of confirmation. The current manuscript demonstrates qualitative agreement through direct visual and dynamical comparison between mean-field predictions and stochastic simulations for the Hopf, Turing, and Turing-Hopf cases, but does not report explicit metrics such as relative deviations in critical delays or spatial scales. In the revised version we will add these quantitative comparisons (e.g., relative error in the Hopf critical delay and bump width metrics) to the results section and update the abstract to reference the quantitative nature of the validation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Mean-field derivation and bifurcation analysis: The closure of the population dynamics at the mean level is invoked to derive the subcritical Hopf, Turing, and Turing-Hopf conditions, but no explicit bound or check is provided on the neglect of higher-order moments and finite-size fluctuations near the thresholds when both delays and spatially heterogeneous couplings are present.

    Authors: The mean-field equations are obtained via a standard first-order moment closure that becomes exact in the thermodynamic limit of large network size. We acknowledge that the manuscript does not supply an explicit mathematical bound on the neglected higher-order moments or finite-size fluctuations near the critical points, especially under combined delays and spatial heterogeneity. We will revise the methods and discussion sections to include a more detailed justification of the closure assumptions, additional finite-size scaling simulations to provide an empirical assessment of fluctuation effects, and references to existing literature on mean-field validity in spiking networks. A fully rigorous a priori error bound for this specific setting would require substantial further theoretical work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Deriving a rigorous explicit mathematical bound on the approximation error arising from moment closure and finite-size fluctuations near the bifurcations with delays and spatial couplings.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Mean-field bifurcation analysis validated by independent stochastic simulations

full rationale

The paper starts from deterministic mean-field equations derived from the soft-threshold integrate-and-fire population dynamics and derives bifurcation conditions (subcritical Hopf, Turing, Turing-Hopf) for patterns such as uniform oscillations, stationary bumps, and standing/traveling waves. These predictions are then tested against separate simulations of the underlying stochastic model, providing an external check rather than reducing to a fit or self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling are evident in the derivation chain. This is a standard, non-circular workflow with the mean-field serving as an approximation whose accuracy is assessed via simulation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard large-population mean-field closure for stochastic spiking neurons; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced in the reported results.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Deterministic mean-field equations accurately represent the macroscopic dynamics of a large stochastic integrate-and-fire population.
    Invoked to obtain the stationary uniform equilibrium and its linear stability conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1193 out tokens · 37164 ms · 2026-05-21T22:50:04.501919+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    L. F. Abbott and T. B. Kepler , Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to hopfield , in Sta- tistical Mechanics of Neural Networks, L. Garrido, ed., vol. 368, Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, pp. 5–18, https://doi.org/10.1007/3540532676 37, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ 3540532676 37 (accessed 2024-10-23)

    work page doi:10.1007/3540532676 2024

  2. [2]

    Amari, Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 27, pp

    S.-i. Amari, Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 27, pp. 77– 87, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337259, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00337259 (accessed 2025-05-21)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00337259 2025

  3. [3]

    Avitabile, M

    D. Avitabile, M. Desroches, R. Veltz, and M. Wechselberger , Local theory for spatio- temporal canards and delayed bifurcations , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 52 (2020), pp. 5703–5747

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Ben-Yishai, R

    R. Ben-Yishai, R. L. Bar-Or, and H. Sompolinsky , Theory of orientation tuning in vis- ual cortex., 92, pp. 3844–3848, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844, https://www.pnas. org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844 (accessed 2025-04-07)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.92.9.3844 2025

  5. [5]

    P. C. Bressloff , Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields , 45, p. 033001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/3/033001, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10. 1088/1751-8113/45/3/033001 (accessed 2024-07-04)

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/3/033001 2024

  6. [6]

    P. C. Bressloff, Stochastic Neural Field Theory and the System-Size Expansion, 70, pp. 1488– 1521, https://doi.org/10.1137/090756971, http://epubs.siam.org/doi/10.1137/090756971 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1137/090756971 2025

  7. [7]

    Brunel, Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8 (2000), pp

    N. Brunel, Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8 (2000), pp. 183–208, https://doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1008925309027

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1008925309027 2000

  8. [8]

    Brunel and V

    N. Brunel and V. Hakim, Fast Global Oscillations in Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons with Low Firing Rates , Neural Computation, 11 (1999), pp. 1621–1671, https://doi.org/ 10.1162/089976699300016179

    work page doi:10.1162/089976699300016179 1999

  9. [9]

    M. A. Buice and J. D. Cowan , Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural net- works, 75, p. 051919, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.051919, https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.051919 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.75.051919 2025

  10. [10]

    Iomin, Fractional-time quantum dynamics, Phys

    ´A. Byrne, D. Avitabile, and S. Coombes, Next-generation neural field model: The evolution of synchrony within patterns and waves, 99, p. 012313, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE. 99.012313, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.012313 (accessed 2025-05-31)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve 2025

  11. [11]

    Camperi and X.-J

    M. Camperi and X.-J. Wang, A Model of Visuospatial Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex: Recurrent Network and Cellular Bistability , 5, pp. 383–405, https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1008837311948, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008837311948 (accessed 2025-04-07)

    work page doi:10.1023/a: 2025

  12. [12]

    B. G. Carlo R. Laing, William C. Troy and G. B. Ermentrout , Multiple Bumps in a Neuronal Model of Working Memory , https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139901389495, https: //epubs.siam.org/doi/epdf/10.1137/S0036139901389495 (accessed 2025-04-07)

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036139901389495 2025

  13. [13]

    C. C. Chow and M. A. Buice , Path Integral Methods for Stochastic Differential Equations, 5, p. 8, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-015-0018-5, https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13408-015-0018-5 (accessed 2024-10-23)

    work page doi:10.1186/s13408-015-0018-5 2024

  14. [14]

    Coombes, P

    S. Coombes, P. Beim Graben, R. Potthast, and J. Wright , Neural Fields: Theory and Applications, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54593-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54593-1 2014

  15. [15]

    R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth , On the LambertW function , 5, pp. 329–359, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124750, https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF02124750 (accessed 2025-07-25)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02124750 2025

  16. [16]

    Cormier, E

    Q. Cormier, E. Tanr ´e, and R. Veltz , Hopf bifurcation in a Mean-Field model of spiking neurons , 26, https://doi.org/10.1214/21-EJP688, https: //projecteuclid.org/journals/electronic-journal-of-probability/volume-26/issue-none/ Hopf-bifurcation-in-a-Mean-Field-model-of-spiking-neurons/10.1214/21-EJP688.full (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1214/21-ejp688 2025

  17. [17]

    De Masi, A

    A. De Masi, A. Galves, E. L ¨ocherbach, and E. Presutti , Hydrodynamic Limit for Inter- acting Neurons, Journal of Statistical Physics, 158 (2015), pp. 866–902, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10955-014-1145-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-014-1145-1 2015

  18. [18]

    Destexhe, Z

    A. Destexhe, Z. F. Mainen, T. J. Sejnowski, C. E. Koch, and I. E. Segev , Kinetic Models of Synaptic Transmission, in Methods in Neuronal Modeling, 2nd edition ed

    work page

  19. [19]

    Dumont, J

    G. Dumont, J. Henry, and C. O. Tarniceriu , Oscillations in a Fully Connected Network of Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons with a Poisson Spiking Mechanism, Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34 (2023), p. 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-023-09995-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00332-023-09995-x 2023

  20. [20]

    Dumont and C

    G. Dumont and C. O. Tarniceriu, Pattern Formation in a Spiking Neural-Field of Renewal Neurons, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 23 (2024), pp. 2670–2694, https: //doi.org/10.1137/24M1631274

    work page doi:10.1137/24m1631274 2024

  21. [21]

    Engelborghs, T

    K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, and D. Roose , Numerical bifurcation analysis of delay 28 L. FORBES, J. GROSSMAN, M. AVERY, R. GOH, AND G.K. OCKER differential equations using DDE-BIFTOOL , ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 28 (2002), pp. 1– 21, https://doi.org/10.1145/513001.513002

    work page doi:10.1145/513001.513002 2002

  22. [22]

    G. B. Ermentrout and J. D. Cowan, A mathematical theory of visual hallucination patterns , 34, pp. 137–150, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336965, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ BF00336965 (accessed 2024-07-25)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00336965 2024

  23. [23]

    Faye and M

    G. Faye and M. Holzer , Modulated traveling fronts for a nonlocal Fisher-KPP equation: a dynamical systems approach, Journal of Differential Equations, 258 (2015), pp. 2257–2289

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Faye and A

    G. Faye and A. Scheel, Center manifolds without a phase space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 370 (2018), pp. 5843–5885

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Gerstner , Population Dynamics of Spiking Neurons: Fast Transients, Asynchronous States, and Locking , 12, pp

    W. Gerstner , Population Dynamics of Spiking Neurons: Fast Transients, Asynchronous States, and Locking , 12, pp. 43–89, https://doi.org/10.1162/089976600300015899, https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6789434 (accessed 2025-08-11)

    work page doi:10.1162/089976600300015899 2025

  26. [26]

    Ginzburg and H

    I. Ginzburg and H. Sompolinsky , Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks , 50, pp. 3171–3191, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.3171, https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.3171 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.50.3171 2025

  27. [27]

    Grossberg , Contour Enhancement, Short Term Memory, and Constancies in Rever- berating Neural Networks , vol

    S. Grossberg , Contour Enhancement, Short Term Memory, and Constancies in Rever- berating Neural Networks , vol. 70, Springer Netherlands, pp. 332–378, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-009-7758-7 8, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-009-7758-7 8 (ac- cessed 2025-07-01)

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-7758-7 2025

  28. [28]

    Grossberg , Learning and energy-entropy dependence in some nonlinear functional- differential systems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 75 (1969), pp

    S. Grossberg , Learning and energy-entropy dependence in some nonlinear functional- differential systems, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 75 (1969), pp. 1238– 1242, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1969-12373-6

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1969-12373-6 1969

  29. [29]

    Hansel and H

    D. Hansel and H. Sompolinsky, 13 modeling feature selectivity in local cortical circuits, 1998

    work page 1998

  30. [30]

    Haragus and G

    M. Haragus and G. Iooss, Local bifurcations, center manifolds, and normal forms in infinite- dimensional dynamical systems , Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    work page 2010

  31. [31]

    Huang, D

    C. Huang, D. A. Ruff, R. Pyle, R. Rosenbaum, M. R. Cohen, and B. Do- iron, Circuit Models of Low-Dimensional Shared Variability in Cortical Networks , 101, pp. 337–348.e4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.034, https://www.cell.com/ neuron/abstract/S0896-6273(18)31043-2 (accessed 2025-07-11), https://arxiv.org/abs/ 30581012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.034 2018

  32. [32]

    E. M. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience the Geometry of Excitability and Burst- ing, MIT Press, online-ausg ed

    work page

  33. [33]

    Jabin, V

    P.-E. Jabin, V. Schmutz, and D. Zhou , Dense networks of integrate-and-fire neurons: Spatially-extended mean-field limit of the empirical measure , https://doi.org/10.48550/ ARXIV.2409.06325, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06325 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Jolivet, F

    R. Jolivet, F. Sch ¨urmann, T. K. Berger, R. Naud, W. Gerstner, and A. Roth , The quantitative single-neuron modeling competition, 99, pp. 417–426, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00422-008-0261-x, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-008-0261-x (accessed 2025- 07-01)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0261-x 2025

  35. [35]

    C. R. Laing and C. C. Chow, Stationary Bumps in Networks of Spiking Neurons, 13, pp. 1473– 1494, https://doi.org/10.1162/089976601750264974, https://direct.mit.edu/neco/article/ 13/7/1473-1494/6534 (accessed 2025-03-19)

    work page doi:10.1162/089976601750264974 2025

  36. [36]

    Montbri ´o, D

    E. Montbri ´o, D. Paz ´o, and A. Roxin , Macroscopic Description for Networks of Spiking Neurons, 5, p. 021028, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021028, https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021028 (accessed 2025-04-07)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.021028 2025

  37. [37]

    R. Naud, N. Marcille, C. Clopath, and W. Gerstner , Firing patterns in the adap- tive exponential integrate-and-fire model , 99, pp. 335–347, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00422-008-0264-7, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00422-008-0264-7 (accessed 2025- 07-06)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0264-7 2025

  38. [38]

    G. K. Ocker, Dynamics of stochastic integrate-and-fire networks , (2023), https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevX.13.041047

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Ohira and J

    T. Ohira and J. D. Cowan , Master-equation approach to stochastic neurodynamics , 48, pp. 2259–2266, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.2259, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.48.2259 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.48.2259 2025

  40. [40]

    Paliwal, G

    S. Paliwal, G. K. Ocker, and B. A. W. Brinkman , Metastability in networks of stochastic integrate-and-fire neurons, 111, p. 064402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.064402, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.111.064402 (accessed 2025-07-01)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.111.064402 2025

  41. [41]

    D. J. Pinto, J. C. Brumberg, D. J. Simons, G. B. Ermentrout, and R. Traub , A quan- titative population model of whisker barrels: Re-examining the Wilson-Cowan equations , 3, pp. 247–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161134, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ BF00161134 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00161134 2025

  42. [42]

    Robert and J

    P. Robert and J. Touboul , On the Dynamics of Random Neuronal Networks , 165, COHERENT DYNAMICS IN SOFT-THRESHOLD INTEGRATE-AND-FIRE NETWORKS 29 pp. 545–584, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-016-1622-9, http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/s10955-016-1622-9 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-016-1622-9 2025

  43. [43]

    Rosenbaum and B

    R. Rosenbaum and B. Doiron, Balanced Networks of Spiking Neurons with Spatially Depen- dent Recurrent Connections , 4, p. 021039, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021039, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.021039 (accessed 2024-07-25)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.021039 2024

  44. [44]

    Roxin, N

    A. Roxin, N. Brunel, and D. Hansel , Role of Delays in Shaping Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Neuronal Activity in Large Networks , Physical Review Letters, 94 (2005), p. 238103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.238103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.238103 2005

  45. [45]

    Schmutz, E

    V. Schmutz, E. L ¨ocherbach, and T. Schwalger , On a Finite-Size Neuronal Population Equation, 22, pp. 996–1029, https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1445041, https://epubs.siam. org/doi/10.1137/21M1445041 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1137/21m1445041 2025

  46. [46]

    Schwalger and A

    T. Schwalger and A. V. Chizhov , Mind the last spike — firing rate models for mesoscopic populations of spiking neurons , Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 58 (2019), pp. 155–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2019.08.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.08.003 2019

  47. [47]

    DDE-BIFTOOL Manual - Bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations

    J. Sieber, K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, G. Samaey, and D. Roose , DDE-BIFTOOL Manual - Bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations , Sept. 2016, https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.1406.7144, https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.7144 2016

  48. [48]

    Teeter, R

    C. Teeter, R. Iyer, V. Menon, N. Gouwens, D. Feng, J. Berg, A. Szafer, N. Cain, H. Zeng, M. Hawrylycz, C. Koch, and S. Mihalas , Generalized leaky integrate-and-fire models classify multiple neuron types , 9, p. 709, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-017-02717-4, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02717-4 (ac- cessed 2025-07-01)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02717-4 2025

  49. [49]

    Touboul and R

    J. Touboul and R. Brette, Dynamics and bifurcations of the adaptive exponential integrate- and-fire model, 99, pp. 319–334, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-008-0267-4, http://link. springer.com/10.1007/s00422-008-0267-4 (accessed 2025-07-06)

    work page doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0267-4 2025

  50. [50]

    Uecker, Numerical continuation and bifurcation in Nonlinear PDEs , SIAM, 2021

    H. Uecker, Numerical continuation and bifurcation in Nonlinear PDEs , SIAM, 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Van Vreeswijk, L

    C. Van Vreeswijk, L. F. Abbott, and G. Bard Ermentrout, When inhibition not excitation synchronizes neural firing, Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1 (1994), pp. 313–321, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961879

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00961879 1994

  52. [52]

    Vanderbauwhede and G

    A. Vanderbauwhede and G. Iooss , Center manifold theory in infinite dimensions , in Dy- namics reported: expositions in dynamical systems, Springer, 1992, pp. 125–163

    work page 1992

  53. [53]

    M. A. Whittington, R. D. Traub, N. Kopell, B. Ermentrout, and E. H. Buhl, Inhibition- based rhythms: Experimental and mathematical observations on network dynamics , Inter- national Journal of Psychophysiology, 38 (2000), pp. 315–336, https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0167-8760(00)00173-2

    work page 2000

  54. [54]

    H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan , Excitatory and Inhibitory Interactions in Localized Popu- lations of Model Neurons , 12, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86068-5, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006349572860685 (accessed 2024-10-29)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(72)86068-5 2024