Bright yet dark: how strong coupling quenches exciton-polariton radiation

Bo Zhen; Jiaxun Song; Li He

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 25 references

Bright yet dark: how strong coupling quenches exciton-polariton radiation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that polariton radiation is a coherent interference between photonic and excitonic emission channels, so strong coupling can completely quench it even when each channel is bright alone.

desk verdict Strong, plausible framework that reframes polariton decay as interference, but the posted arXiv omits the derivations a referee would need to check the central beta and collective-mode construction. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21247 v1 pith:FD4U5JGF submitted 2025-08-28 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Jiaxun Song , Li He , Bo Zhen This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall PACS 71.36.+c42.70.Qs

keywords exciton-polaritonsboundstatesinthecontinuumradiativedecaysuppressionstronglight-mattercouplingphotoniccrystalslabstransitionmetaldichalcogenidesdestructiveinterferencecoupledoscillatormodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the standard picture of exciton-polariton decay—in which the exciton and photon fractions radiate independently and their rates simply add—breaks down in strongly coupled nanophotonic systems. It argues that, because excitons couple collectively to the periodic photonic field, the polariton's radiation is a coherent interference between two emission amplitudes: the photonic amplitude and the collective-excitonic amplitude. When those amplitudes are equal and opposite, radiation cancels completely, producing polaritonic bound states in the continuum with radiative lifetime limited only by nonradiative decay. If true, this gives a practical path to ultra-long-lived polaritons in TMD monolayers on photonic-crystal slabs, directly attacking the roughly one-picosecond lifetime bottleneck that blocks nonlinear and quantum polaritonics.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polariton radiation amplitude tau_{omega,d,pm} = c_p kappa_{omega,d} +/- c_x beta_{omega,d}: a complex amplitude for emission to free space composed of the photon-mode radiation amplitude kappa, the collective-exciton radiation amplitude beta, and the photon/exciton Hopfield weights c_p and c_x. It carries the argument because it converts polariton decay from a sum of independent rates into a phase-sensitive interference problem; the condition tau = 0 defines a polaritonic BIC. The second piece of machinery is the collective exciton mode x^+_k, the coherent superposition of plane-wave exciton modes whose spatial profile mirrors the photonic mode. It carries the argu

What would settle it

Measure the radiative linewidth of the upper and lower polariton branches versus in-plane momentum in a TMD-on-photonic-crystal slab with the monolayer at the slab mid-plane. If the paper's mechanism is right, the radiative linewidths should drop to zero at one momentum in each branch, symmetrically flanking the bare photonic BIC; total linewidths should plateau at half the nonradiative exciton linewidth. Lifting the monolayer 20 nm away from the mid-plane should restore finite radiative linewidths and split each integer far-field vortex into two half-integer vortices.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a polariton's coupling to the radiation continuum is tau_{omega,d,pm} = c_p kappa_{omega,d} +/- c_x beta_{omega,d}: the photonic and collective-excitonic radiation amplitudes add as complex numbers, not as rates. This means complete destructive interference (tau = 0) is possible even when both the photon mode and the collective exciton mode are individually bright. The collective exciton radiation beta is itself modified by strong coupling: the excitons form one superradiant mode whose spatial profile follows the nanophotonic field, so radiation from different parts of the unit cell can cancel, and beta can even vanish entirely. The paper demonstrates two ro

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that all excitons in the photonic unit cell radiate with a fixed phase relative to one another, as a single coherent collective mode; if dephasing or a finite coherence length breaks that phase lock, the destructive interference is incomplete and radiation returns.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At a polaritonic BIC, the radiative linewidth vanishes and the total polariton linewidth is set by nonradiative exciton decay alone, reaching half the bare nonradiative exciton linewidth.
Symmetry-protected polaritonic BICs occur at Gamma because the collective exciton inherits the photonic mode's even C2 rotation symmetry, while the k=0 exciton plane-wave component is odd and absent.
Interference-induced polaritonic BICs appear away from Gamma wherever the photonic radiation amplitude changes sign and the collective-exciton amplitude stays constant, with upper and lower polariton BICs on opposite sides of the bare photonic BIC.
Preserving up-down mirror symmetry is required for these off-Gamma BICs; displacing the monolayer 20 nm from the slab mid-plane turns each integer far-field vortex into a pair of half-integer vortices with finite radiation.
The same amplitude-interference description applies across material platforms (quantum wells, perovskites, nanocavities, plasmonic lattices), so 'dark yet bright' polaritons can be engineered by nanophotonic design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If dephasing within the exciton ensemble is finite, the cancellation condition becomes approximate rather than exact; the residual radiative linewidth should scale with the exciton coherence length and could be tuned by temperature or disorder—an experimentally testable version of the paper's coherence assumption.
Because tau is a complex amplitude, tuning the exciton-photon detuning (e.g., electrostatically) should move the interference-induced BIC continuously in momentum space, offering an electrically reconfigurable dark state.
The predicted half-nonradiative-linewidth saturation is a sharp, quantitative fingerprint that could be searched for in existing transmission spectra of TMD metasurface polaritons without any new experiment.
The same two-channel amplitude-cancellation logic should apply to other hybrid quasiparticles that couple to a common continuum (for example phonon- or magnon-polaritons), where dark states could be engineered from bright constituents.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core idea here is genuinely worth your time: polariton radiation is treated as coherent interference between photonic and excitonic channels, tau = cp kappa +/- cx beta, rather than independent decay rates, and they use this to predict both symmetry-protected and off-Gamma polaritonic BICs. That is a real step beyond the coupled oscillator model, not just a rephrasing. The FDTD simulations with realistic MoSe2/InGaP parameters give independent support, and the symmetry-breaking control in Fig. 4 is a smart check: when sigma_z is broken, the off-Gamma BICs vanish and the vortex splits, exactly as the interference picture predicts.

The biggest problem is that the posted manuscript points to the Supplemental Material for the derivations of beta, the collective mode construction, and the sign flip of kappa, but that supplemental is not included in the arXiv version. A referee cannot verify the central algebra from what is actually posted. The linewidth fits in Fig. 2c have no error bars, and the paper does not give lattice constant, slab thickness, or hole radius, which makes the FDTD results hard to reproduce or compare. The coherence worry is also legitimate: the off-Gamma BIC relies on a perfectly coherent collective exciton superposition across the unit cell, and a local Lorentz model in FDTD does not test finite coherence length or dephasing. That does not invalidate the framework, but it does mean the strongest claim--infinite radiative lifetimes at arbitrary k--is contingent on ideal coherence that the simulation assumes rather than demonstrates.

Who should read this: people working on polariton BICs, TMD nanophotonics, and long-lived polaritons. The framework is likely to influence how the field thinks about polariton decay even before the quantitative predictions are nailed down experimentally. It deserves a serious referee; the right response is to send it out, with the clear request that the supplemental derivations be included in the posted version and that the quantitative comparison between simulated linewidths and the tau = 0 condition be made explicit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a theoretical framework for the radiative decay of exciton-polaritons in TMD-on-photonic-crystal systems. Starting from a Hamiltonian that couples a photonic Bloch mode, multi-plane-wave exciton modes, and the radiation continuum, the authors argue that the excitons form a single collective bright mode whose radiative coupling is suppressed by its small projection onto the radiating plane-wave component. They further show that polariton radiation is set by coherent interference of photonic and excitonic channels, τ = c_p κ ± c_x β, rather than by a weighted sum of rates. This leads to two types of polaritonic BICs: symmetry-protected BICs at Γ and interference-induced BICs at off-Γ momenta where the two channels cancel. FDTD simulations with realistic material parameters, including a symmetry-breaking control in Fig. 4, qualitatively support the mechanism. The paper concludes that such polaritonic BICs have theoretically infinite radiative lifetimes, limited only by nonradiative exciton decay.

Significance. If the central mechanism holds, the paper provides a clear conceptual advance over the standard coupled-oscillator model: it identifies collective destructive interference, both within the exciton ensemble and between excitonic and photonic channels, as a design lever for long-lived polaritons. The theoretical framework is analytic and the predictions are concrete and falsifiable. The FDTD simulations, especially the σ_z-symmetry-breaking control in Fig. 4, lend independent support to the interference interpretation. The topological characterization of the polaritonic BICs via far-field polarization vortices is a valuable addition. The main weaknesses are the oversimplified polariton transformation in Eq. (2), the lack of an explicit definition of β in the main text, and the unexamined assumption of ideal spatial coherence of the collective exciton. These issues are fixable, but they are load-bearing for the quantitative predictions of off-Γ BICs.

major comments (3)

[Eq. (2), 'Another crucial feature...'] The polariton basis p_{k,±} = c_p a_k ± c_x x_k is stated to diagonalize the Hamiltonian, but for a general two-mode Hamiltonian with ω_p ≠ ω_x the eigenstates are branch-dependent Hopfield superpositions, e.g., p_+ = cosθ a + sinθ x, p_- = -sinθ a + cosθ x. Consequently, τ_{ω,d,±} = c_p κ_{ω,d} ± c_x β_{ω,d} is only valid at zero detuning (c_p = c_x = 1/√2). The correct general form is τ_+ = c_{p,+} κ + c_{x,+} β and τ_- = c_{p,-} κ - c_{x,-} β, with branch-dependent coefficients. This matters for the off-Γ BIC condition in Fig. 3, because the cancellation depends on the ratio c_p/c_x for each branch. Please generalize the expression or explicitly state that the symmetric form applies only in the resonant case.
[After Eq. (1), definition of β_{ω,d}] The collective exciton radiation rate β_{ω,d} is introduced and used in Eq. (2) but is never defined in the main text. From Eq. (1), it follows that β_{ω,d} = Σ_σ (g_{k,σ}/g) γ_{ω,d,σ} up to a gauge phase, i.e., the projection of the bright collective mode x_k onto the radiating plane-wave exciton b_{k,σ}. This projection is the foundation of the suppression mechanism and the Γ-point dark collective mode. Please include this definition and the projection step explicitly (or state clearly where in the Supplemental Material it is derived).
['In addition to those protected by symmetry' and Fig. 3] The exact cancellation c_p κ ± c_x β = 0 that produces off-Γ polaritonic BICs relies on the collective exciton mode x_k being an ideally phase-coherent superposition of exciton modes with a single frequency ω_x. Real TMD monolayers have finite exciton coherence length, momentum-dependent dephasing, and inhomogeneous broadening, all of which would reduce the effective weight of b_{k,σ} in the bright state and partially restore radiation. The FDTD validation models the TMD as a local Lorentz medium (Refs. 18,19), which imposes a perfectly coherent local response and does not test finite coherence length. Please discuss the robustness of the off-Γ BIC to decoherence or include a numerical estimate of the residual linewidth as a function of coherence length.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 2 caption/axis] Typo in the axis label: 'coupled oscilator' should be 'coupled oscillator'.
[Eq. (1) and notation] The exciton-continuum coupling is written as γ_{ω,d,σ}, but β_{ω,d} later has no σ index; clarify how the polarization summation is folded into β_{ω,d}.
[Abstract vs. Conclusion] The abstract says 'infinitely long radiative lifetimes' while the conclusion says 'theoretically infinite radiative lifetimes'; please be consistent and note explicitly that this is within the ideal coherent model.
[Reference [20]] Reference [20] is an arXiv preprint; if a peer-reviewed version is available, it should be cited instead.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central derivation is independent, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The polariton-continuum coupling τ_{ω,d,±} = c_p κ_{ω,d} ± c_x β_{ω,d} follows by exact linear algebra from the Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) after transforming to the polariton basis (Eq. 2); it is not fitted to data. The collective exciton mode x_k is defined as the normalized superposition of exciton modes weighted by the photonic coupling constants g_{k',σ}, and its radiation amplitude β is the projection of that superposition onto the radiating plane-wave component b_{k,σ} (below Eq. 1). This is a model assumption about spatial coherence, not a circular step: the theory then predicts that β can be small or zero depending on the photonic mode profile, and the FDTD simulations using a Lorentz-medium model provide an independent numerical check with realistic material parameters. The finite nonradiative decay and material parameters are taken from literature, not fitted to produce the BIC. The off-Γ BIC condition c_p κ ± c_x β = 0 is a genuine cancellation condition evaluated from the computed amplitudes, and the breaking of σ_z symmetry is shown to destroy it, confirming that the effect is not built in by definition. The only self-citations (Refs. [9], [20], [21], [22]) are background or peripheral validation (e.g., Rabi splitting compared to the authors' own arXiv preprint); none is load-bearing for the central derivation. No circular step of any of the enumerated kinds is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on coherent collective coupling, radiative-mode selection, and symmetry/gauge assumptions; no new entities are postulated. The FDTD simulation is an independent check, but the mapping from the local Lorentz medium to the momentum-space Hamiltonian is assumed.

free parameters (3)

Exciton nonradiative linewidth gamma_x,nr = 0.8 meV
Material input for the FDTD Lorentz medium; not fitted to the central claim. The observed total linewidth saturation at half this value is a prediction, not a fit.
Exciton resonance energy E_x = 1.654 eV
Input chosen to be resonant with the photonic band; a design/input parameter.
Photonic crystal structural parameters (lattice constant, thickness, hole radius) = not stated in main text
Design parameters for the FDTD structure; not fitted to the target result but required for reproduction, and absent from the main text.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Exciton ensemble forms a single collective mode x^+_k with amplitudes g_{k',sigma}, fully coherent across the photonic unit cell.
This is the key premise for the collective suppression beta << gamma. If exciton coherence length is shorter than the unit cell, interference is incomplete. Introduced in Eq. (1) and the text after it.
domain assumption Only the exciton mode with k'=k radiates into the far field below the diffraction limit.
Text: 'below the diffraction limit, only the exciton mode b^+_{k,sigma} exhibits far-field exciton emission.' This makes beta proportional to the weight of that mode.
standard math The photonic mode at Gamma is even under C2z while free-space modes are odd; the radiative exciton component b_{Gamma,sigma} is odd.
Used to show that beta = 0 at Gamma, giving symmetry-protected polaritonic BICs.
standard math Under sigma_z symmetry, both kappa and beta can be made real by a gauge choice, so a single kx can satisfy tau = 0.
Time-reversal and mirror symmetry argument in the off-Gamma BIC section; needed for the destructive interference condition.
domain assumption The TMD monolayer is modeled as a Lorentz medium in FDTD with finite nonradiative decay, accurately representing the exciton response.
Simulations rely on this model; the mapping between the local Lorentz medium and the momentum-space Hamiltonian is not shown in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bright yet dark: how strong coupling quenches exciton-polariton radiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FD4U5JGF

@misc{pith2026250821247,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bright yet dark: how strong coupling quenches exciton-polariton radiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FD4U5JGF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21247}
}

read the original abstract

Understanding the radiative decay of exciton-polaritons is essential for achieving long-lived polaritons - a key prerequisite for enhancing nonlinear and quantum polaritonic effects. However, conventional wisdom - the coupled oscillator model - often oversimplifies polariton radiation as independent emissions from uncoupled excitonic and photonic resonances, overlooking the role of strong exciton-photon coupling in reshaping their radiative behavior. In this work, we present a theoretical framework that goes beyond the conventional coupled oscillator model by fully accounting for the collective and coherent nature of exciton-photon interactions. We demonstrate that these interactions can strongly suppress polariton radiation via destructive interference - both within the excitonic ensemble and between excitonic and photonic radiation channels - giving rise to polaritonic bound states in the continuum with infinitely long radiative lifetimes. Our approach offers a unified description of polariton radiative decay and establishes new design principles for engineering long-lived exciton-polaritons with tailored radiation properties, opening new avenues for nonlinear, topological, and quantum polaritonic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21247 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Symmetry-protected polaritonic BICs. a. Transmission spectra of the coupled TMD-PhC slab under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Interference-induced polaritonic BICs. a. Transmis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Disappearance of polaritonic BICs under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Byrnes, N

T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton– polariton condensates, Nature Physics 10, 803 (2014)

work page 2014
[2]

Sanvitto and S

D. Sanvitto and S. K´ ena-Cohen, The road towards po- laritonic devices, Nature materials 15, 1061 (2016)

work page 2016
[3]

P. G. Zotev, P. Bouteyre, Y. Wang, S. A. Randerson, X. Hu, L. Sortino, Y. Wang, T. Shegai, S.-H. Gong, A. Tittl, et al., Nanophotonics with multilayer van der waals materials, Nature Photonics , 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 021001 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton-polariton bose-einstein condensation, Reviews of modern physics 82, 1489 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Zhang, R

L. Zhang, R. Gogna, W. Burg, E. Tutuc, and H. Deng, Photonic-crystal exciton-polaritons in monolayer semi- conductors, Nature communications 9, 713 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

Y. Chen, S. Miao, T. Wang, D. Zhong, A. Saxena, C. Chow, J. Whitehead, D. Gerace, X. Xu, S.-F. Shi, et al., Metasurface integrated monolayer exciton polari- ton, Nano Letters 20, 5292 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

Khestanova, V

E. Khestanova, V. Shahnazaryan, V. K. Kozin, V. I. Kon- dratyev, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, I. A. She- lykh, I. V. Iorsh, and V. Kravtsov, Electrostatic control of nonlinear photonic-crystal polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nano Letters 24, 7350 (2024)

work page 2024

Show all 25 references

[9]

L. He, J. Wu, J. Jin, E. J. Mele, and B. Zhen, Polaritonic chern insulators in monolayer semiconductors, Physical Review Letters 130, 043801 (2023)

2023
[10]

N. H. M. Dang, S. Zanotti, E. Drouard, C. Chevalier, G. Tripp´ e-Allard, M. Amara, E. Deleporte, V. Ardiz- zone, D. Sanvitto, L. C. Andreani, et al., Realization of polaritonic topological charge at room temperature using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskite...

2022
[11]

Kravtsov, E

V. Kravtsov, E. Khestanova, F. A. Benimetskiy, T. Ivanova, A. K. Samusev, I. S. Sinev, D. Pidgayko, A. M. Mozharov, I. S. Mukhin, M. S. Lozhkin, et al., Nonlinear polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor cou- pled to optical bound states in the continuum, Light: Science & Appli...

2020
[12]

Ardizzone, F

V. Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, S. Zanotti, A. Gianfrate, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, D. Su` arez-Forero, F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Gigli, et al., Polari- ton bose–einstein condensate from a bound state in the continuum, Nature 605, 447 (2022)

2022
[13]

X. Wu, S. Zhang, J. Song, X. Deng, W. Du, X. Zeng, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, et al., Exciton polariton condensation from bound states in the contin- uum at room temperature, Nature Communications 15, 3345 (2024)

2024
[14]

C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Bound states in the continuum, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1 (2016)

2016
[15]

Sakoda, Optical properties of photonic crystals (Springer, 2005)

K. Sakoda, Optical properties of photonic crystals (Springer, 2005)

2005
[16]

R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Physical review 93, 99 (1954)

1954
[17]

Flexcompute Inc., Tidy3d: Spatiotemporal electromag- netic solver, https://www.flexcompute.com/tidy3d/ (2025)

2025
[18]

Y. Zhou, G. Scuri, J. Sung, R. J. Gelly, D. S. Wild, K. De Greve, A. Y. Joe, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. Kim, et al., Controlling excitons in an atomically thin membrane with a mirror, Physical review letters 124, 027401 (2020)

2020
[19]

Wang and S

H. Wang and S. Fan, Lorentz–drude dipoles in the ra- diative limit and their modeling in finite-difference time- domain methods, Annalen der Physik , e00156 (2025)

2025
[20]

Z. Wang, L. He, B. Kim, and B. Zhen, Strongly nonlinear nanocavity exciton-polaritons in gate-tunable monolayer semiconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16635 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[21]

B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological nature of optical bound states in the contin- uum, Physical review letters 113, 257401 (2014)

2014
[22]

X. Yin, J. Jin, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, C. Peng, and B. Zhen, Ob- servation of topologically enabled unidirectional guided resonances, Nature 580, 467 (2020)

2020
[23]

W. Liu, B. Lee, C. H. Naylor, H.-S. Ee, J. Park, A. C. Johnson, and R. Agarwal, Strong exciton–plasmon cou- pling in mos2 coupled with plasmonic lattice, Nano let- ters 16, 1262 (2016)

2016
[24]

Delteil, T

A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schnei- der, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons, Nature materials 18, 219 (2019)

2019
[25]

Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A

G. Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues, et al., Emergence of quantum cor- relations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nature materials 18, 213 (2019)

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Byrnes, N

T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton– polariton condensates, Nature Physics 10, 803 (2014)

work page 2014

[2] [2]

Sanvitto and S

D. Sanvitto and S. K´ ena-Cohen, The road towards po- laritonic devices, Nature materials 15, 1061 (2016)

work page 2016

[3] [3]

P. G. Zotev, P. Bouteyre, Y. Wang, S. A. Randerson, X. Hu, L. Sortino, Y. Wang, T. Shegai, S.-H. Gong, A. Tittl, et al., Nanophotonics with multilayer van der waals materials, Nature Photonics , 1 (2025)

work page 2025

[4] [4]

G. Wang, A. Chernikov, M. M. Glazov, T. F. Heinz, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Colloquium: Excitons in atomically thin transition metal dichalco- genides, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 021001 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [5]

H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton-polariton bose-einstein condensation, Reviews of modern physics 82, 1489 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Zhang, R

L. Zhang, R. Gogna, W. Burg, E. Tutuc, and H. Deng, Photonic-crystal exciton-polaritons in monolayer semi- conductors, Nature communications 9, 713 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

Y. Chen, S. Miao, T. Wang, D. Zhong, A. Saxena, C. Chow, J. Whitehead, D. Gerace, X. Xu, S.-F. Shi, et al., Metasurface integrated monolayer exciton polari- ton, Nano Letters 20, 5292 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Khestanova, V

E. Khestanova, V. Shahnazaryan, V. K. Kozin, V. I. Kon- dratyev, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, I. A. She- lykh, I. V. Iorsh, and V. Kravtsov, Electrostatic control of nonlinear photonic-crystal polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nano Letters 24, 7350 (2024)

work page 2024