pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.00166 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Nonadiabatic Wave-Packet Dynamics: Nonadiabatic Metric, Quantum Geometry, and Gravitational Analogy

Yafei Ren , M. E. Sanchez Barrero This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nonadiabatic dynamicswave-packet dynamicsquantum metricBloch electronsanalogue gravityBerry connectionDirac electronsexchange field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonadiabatic effects in Bloch electrons produce an energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric that allows wave-packet dynamics to be viewed as geodesic motion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified theory for the nonadiabatic wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons under slowly varying perturbations. By extending the wave-packet ansatz to include interband contributions and applying the time-dependent variational principle, it derives the wave-packet coefficient equation. Solving this yields leading-order corrections to the wave-packet Lagrangian in the form of a nonadiabatic metric in real and momentum space, identified as the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric, along with modified Berry connections and an energy correction. This metric reformulates the dynamics as geodesic motion in phase space, providing an analogue-gravity perspective for condensed matter systems. Application to one-dimensional Dirac electrons shows that exchange field magnitude variations drive nonadiabatic effects, unlike the adiabatic regime.

Core claim

Extending the conventional wave-packet ansatz to include interband contributions and deriving the wave-packet coefficient equation via the time-dependent variational principle allows integration out of interband terms to obtain nonadiabatic corrections. These include a nonadiabatic metric identified with the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric, modified Berry connections, and an energy correction from Hamiltonian variations, enabling reformulation of wave-packet dynamics as geodesic motion in phase space.

What carries the argument

The nonadiabatic metric in real and momentum space, identified with the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric, which recasts the wave-packet dynamics as geodesic motion.

If this is right

  • The wave-packet dynamics can be reformulated as geodesic motion in an effective phase space geometry defined by the nonadiabatic metric.
  • Modified Berry connections appear for the motion of the wave-packet center due to nonadiabatic effects.
  • An energy correction arises from spatial and temporal variations of the Hamiltonian.
  • In one-dimensional Dirac electron systems, variations in the magnitude of the exchange field are crucial for nonadiabatic dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework could be extended to study nonadiabatic effects in higher-dimensional systems or more complex band structures.
  • Analogue gravity effects might be observable in materials where exchange fields can be tuned slowly.
  • Connections to quantum geometry could lead to new ways to measure the quantum metric experimentally through dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The spatial and temporal perturbations vary slowly, justifying the extension of the wave-packet ansatz and perturbative treatment of interband contributions.

What would settle it

Measuring the trajectory of a wave packet in a one-dimensional Dirac system with a rapidly varying exchange field magnitude and finding paths inconsistent with the predicted geodesic motion under the nonadiabatic metric would falsify the leading-order corrections.

read the original abstract

We develop a unified theory for the nonadiabatic wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons subject to slowly varying spatial and temporal perturbations. Extending the conventional wave-packet ansatz to include interband contributions, we derive equations for the interband coefficients using the time-dependent variational principle, referred to as the wave-packet coefficient equation. Solving these equations and integrating out interband contributions yields the leading-order nonadiabatic corrections to the wave-packet Lagrangian. These corrections appear in three forms: (i) a nonadiabatic metric in real and momentum space, which we identify with the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric, (ii) modified Berry connections associated with the motion of the wave-packet center, and (iii) an energy correction arising from spatial and temporal variations of the Hamiltonian. This metric reformulates the wave-packet dynamics as geodesic motion in phase space, enabling an analogue-gravity perspective in condensed matter systems. As an application, we analyze one-dimensional Dirac electron systems under a slowly varying exchange field $\bm{m}$. Our results demonstrate that variations in the magnitude of $\bm{m}$ are important to nonadiabatic dynamics, in sharp contrast to the adiabatic regime where directional variations of $\bm{m}$ are crucial.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified theory for nonadiabatic wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons under slowly varying spatial and temporal perturbations. It extends the conventional wave-packet ansatz to include interband contributions, applies the time-dependent variational principle to obtain the wave-packet coefficient equation, solves for the interband amplitudes, and integrates them out to derive leading-order corrections to the wave-packet Lagrangian. These corrections consist of (i) a nonadiabatic metric in real and momentum space identified as the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric, (ii) modified Berry connections for the wave-packet center motion, and (iii) an energy correction from Hamiltonian variations. The metric is used to recast the dynamics as geodesic motion in phase space, enabling an analogue-gravity interpretation. As an application, the theory is applied to one-dimensional Dirac electrons under a slowly varying exchange field m, where magnitude variations of m are shown to drive nonadiabatic effects, in contrast to the adiabatic regime.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a systematic route to incorporate nonadiabatic corrections into semiclassical wave-packet dynamics while preserving a geometric interpretation via the renormalized quantum metric. This could be useful for modeling transport and dynamics in systems with moderate gap variations, and the geodesic reformulation offers a concrete link to analogue gravity in condensed-matter settings. The explicit application to the 1D Dirac model with varying m provides a falsifiable prediction distinguishing nonadiabatic from adiabatic regimes.

major comments (2)
  1. [derivation of wave-packet Lagrangian after solving the coefficient equation] The integration of interband coefficients to obtain the effective Lagrangian (leading to the nonadiabatic metric and modified Berry connections) treats interband amplitudes as O(∂H) and discards higher-order terms, but no rigorous remainder estimate or quantitative bound on the slow-variation parameter (such as |∇m|/gap or |∂t m|/gap) is supplied. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed leading-order corrections and the subsequent geodesic reformulation.
  2. [section introducing the nonadiabatic metric] The identification of the nonadiabatic metric with the 'energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric' requires explicit verification that the derived tensor reduces to the standard quantum metric in the appropriate limit; the current presentation leaves the precise renormalization factor and its relation to the gap implicit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [introduction of ansatz and coefficient equation] Notation for the wave-packet center coordinates and the interband coefficients should be introduced with a clear table or list of symbols to improve readability.
  2. [application section] The abstract states that 'variations in the magnitude of m are important,' but the manuscript would benefit from a short comparison table contrasting the adiabatic and nonadiabatic contributions for the Dirac model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and clarify the assumptions and identifications in our derivation while making targeted revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [derivation of wave-packet Lagrangian after solving the coefficient equation] The integration of interband coefficients to obtain the effective Lagrangian (leading to the nonadiabatic metric and modified Berry connections) treats interband amplitudes as O(∂H) and discards higher-order terms, but no rigorous remainder estimate or quantitative bound on the slow-variation parameter (such as |∇m|/gap or |∂t m|/gap) is supplied. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed leading-order corrections and the subsequent geodesic reformulation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the error term would strengthen the presentation. The solution for interband amplitudes is obtained perturbatively from the wave-packet coefficient equation by treating spatial and temporal derivatives of the Hamiltonian as small; by construction the leading correction is linear in these derivatives while quadratic and higher contributions are discarded. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph after Eq. (12) that states the neglected remainder is O((∂H/E_gap)^2) and supplies the quantitative condition |∇m|/gap ≪ 1 together with |∂t m|/gap ≪ 1 for the validity of the leading-order Lagrangian and the geodesic reformulation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [section introducing the nonadiabatic metric] The identification of the nonadiabatic metric with the 'energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric' requires explicit verification that the derived tensor reduces to the standard quantum metric in the appropriate limit; the current presentation leaves the precise renormalization factor and its relation to the gap implicit.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The derived real-space and momentum-space metric components contain an explicit factor 1/E_gap multiplying the conventional quantum metric tensor. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a short calculation (new paragraph following Eq. (15)) showing that, when the gap is taken constant and the slow-variation parameters vanish, the nonadiabatic metric reduces exactly to the standard quantum metric while the extra terms proportional to derivatives of the gap disappear. This makes the renormalization factor and the adiabatic limit fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained perturbative expansion

full rationale

The paper begins from the standard wave-packet ansatz extended by interband terms, applies the time-dependent variational principle to obtain the coefficient equations, solves them to leading order in slow spatial/temporal variations of the Hamiltonian, and integrates out the interband amplitudes to produce the effective Lagrangian corrections. The resulting nonadiabatic metric is derived algebraically and then identified with the energy-gap-renormalized quantum metric; this identification is a post-hoc observation rather than an input definition. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-citation chain bears the central load, and the slow-variation assumption is an explicit perturbative premise rather than a hidden tautology. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in condensed-matter theory for Bloch electrons; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spatial and temporal perturbations vary slowly
    This regime is stated explicitly as the setting for the wave-packet dynamics of Bloch electrons.
  • domain assumption Time-dependent variational principle applies to interband coefficients
    Invoked directly to obtain the wave-packet coefficient equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1385 out tokens · 51732 ms · 2026-05-18T19:04:30.191084+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    As this met- ric originates from nonadiabatic corrections, we term it the nonadiabatic metric

    Nonadiabatic MetricG ij vs Quantum Metric The key distinction between the adiabatic and nona- diabatic wave packet dynamics is theG ij term that in- troduces a metric tensor in theξ-space. As this met- ric originates from nonadiabatic corrections, we term it the nonadiabatic metric. The metric is a gauge-invariant symmetric tensor, which is related to but...

    work page

  2. [2]

    By modifying the Berry con- nections, the nonadiabatic effects introduce corrections to those broad processes

    Modified Berry Connection Berry connections have far-reaching manifestations in different aspects of the electronic properties, includ- ing density of states, polarization, magnetization, and anomalous transport [23]. By modifying the Berry con- nections, the nonadiabatic effects introduce corrections to those broad processes. Since ¯Λn0 in Eq. (22) has t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    emergent gravity

    Nonadiabatic Energy Correction The nonadiabatic energy correction reads δEna =δE ′ na + ˙τ δAτ (37) where δE ′ na = X n̸=0 ˙τ2 A0n τ An0 τ ωn0 + H0n 1 H n0 1 ωn0 (38) δAτ =− X n̸=0 A0n τ H n0 1 +H 0n 1 An0 τ ωn0 .(39) The first term is proportional to ˙τ2, and the coefficient is also an energy-gap weighted quantum metric. The metric is defined in the para...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Jones and C

    H. Jones and C. Zener, The general proof of certain fun- damental equations in the theory of metallic conduction, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Char- acter144, 101 (1934)

    work page 1934

  5. [5]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1348 (1995)

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B53, 7010 (1996)

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Shindou and L

    R. Shindou and L. Balents, Artificial electric field in Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 216601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Shindou and L

    R. Shindou and L. Balents, Gradient expansion approach to multiple-band fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B77, 035110 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    C. H. Wong and Y. Tserkovnyak, Quantum kinetic equa- tion in phase-space textured multiband systems, Phys. Rev. B84, 115209 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Wickles and W

    C. Wickles and W. Belzig, Effective quantum theories for bloch dynamics in inhomogeneous systems with nontriv- ial band structure, Phys. Rev. B88, 045308 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    E. Bettelheim, Derivation of one-particle semiclassical ki- netic theory in the presence of non-Abelian Berry curva- ture, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 415303 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Valet and R

    T. Valet and R. Raimondi, Semiclassical kinetic theory for systems with non-trivial quantum geometry and the expectation value of physical quantities, Europhysics Let- ters143, 26004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    C. Xu, A. Haller, S. Hegde, T. Meng, and T. L. Schmidt, Quantum geometry in the dynamics of band-projected operators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.11425 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    J. C. Slater, Electrons in perturbed periodic lattices, Phys. Rev.76, 1592 (1949)

    work page 1949

  16. [16]

    Luttinger, The effect of a magnetic field on electrons in a periodic potential, Phys

    J. Luttinger, The effect of a magnetic field on electrons in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev.84, 814 (1951)

    work page 1951

  17. [17]

    EN Adams, Motion of an electron in a perturbed peri- odic potential, Phys

    I. EN Adams, Motion of an electron in a perturbed peri- odic potential, Phys. Rev.85, 41 (1952)

    work page 1952

  18. [18]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. Luttinger, Hall effect in ferromagnet- ics, Phys. Rev.95, 1154 (1954)

    work page 1954

  19. [19]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. Luttinger, Quantum theory of electrical transport phenomena, Phys. Rev.108, 590 (1957)

    work page 1957

  20. [20]

    Luttinger, Theory of the Hall effect in ferromagnetic substances, Phys

    J. Luttinger, Theory of the Hall effect in ferromagnetic substances, Phys. Rev.112, 739 (1958)

    work page 1958

  21. [21]

    Adams and E

    E. Adams and E. Blount, Energy bands in the presence of an external force field—II: Anomalous velocities, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids10, 286 (1959)

    work page 1959

  22. [22]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

    work page 1984

  23. [23]

    Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys

    B. Simon, Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and Berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2167 (1983)

    work page 1983

  24. [24]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2747 (1989)

    work page 1989

  25. [25]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry curvature, orbital mo- ment, and effective quantum theory of electrons inelec- tromagnetic fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter20, 193202 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  27. [27]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B91, 214405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Gao and D

    Y. Gao and D. Xiao, Nonreciprocal directional dichroism induced by the quantum metric dipole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 227402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    M. F. Lapa and T. L. Hughes, Semiclassical wave packet dynamics in nonuniform electric fields, Phys. Rev. B99, 121111 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00098 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Liu, X.-B

    T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Quantum geometry in condensed matter, National Science Review 12, nwae334 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quan- tum geometry: Revisiting electronic scales in quantum matter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07173 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Sal´ en, M

    P. Sal´ en, M. Basini, S. Bonetti, J. Hebling, M. Krasil- nikov, A. Y. Nikitin, G. Shamuilov, Z. Tibai, V. Zhauner- chyk, and V. Goryashko, Matter manipulation with ex- treme terahertz light: Progress in the enabling THz tech- nology, Phys. Rep.836, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    F¨ orst, C

    M. F¨ orst, C. Manzoni, S. Kaiser, Y. Tomioka, Y. Tokura, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlinear phononics as an ultrafast route to lattice control, Nat. Phys.7, 854 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Subedi, Light-control of materials via nonlinear phononics, Comptes Rendus

    A. Subedi, Light-control of materials via nonlinear phononics, Comptes Rendus. Physique22, 161 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Levchuk, R

    A. Levchuk, R. Busselez, G. Vaudel, P. Ruello, V. Juv´ e, and B. Arnaud, Nonlinear phononics in bi 2te3 from first- principles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04101 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Co- herent antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater.22, 684 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Pirro, V

    P. Pirro, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Advances in coherent magnonics, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 1114 (2021). 10

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Y. J. Bae, J. Wang, A. Scheie, J. Xu, D. G. Chica, G. M. Diederich, J. Cenker, M. E. Ziebel, Y. Bai, H. Ren,et al., Exciton-coupled coherent magnons in a 2d semiconduc- tor, Nature609, 282 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Nagaosa, Emergent inductor by spiral magnets, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics58, 120909 (2019)

    N. Nagaosa, Emergent inductor by spiral magnets, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics58, 120909 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Yokouchi, F

    T. Yokouchi, F. Kagawa, M. Hirschberger, Y. Otani, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Emergent electromagnetic induction in a helical-spin magnet, Nature586, 232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    X. Nie, X. Wu, Y. Wang, S. Ban, Z. Lei, J. Yi, Y. Liu, and Y. Liu, Surface acoustic wave induced phenomena in two-dimensional materials, Nanoscale Horizons8, 158 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    J. Li, J. Tang, Z. Tao, R. Shi, X. Gao, S. Xue, X. Gao, W. Sun, G. Miao, Z. Su,et al., Nonadiabatic renormal- ization of the phonon dispersion in monolayer and bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 026204 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Lenzing, A

    N. Lenzing, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. Potthoff, Emer- gent non-abelian gauge theory in coupled spin-electron dynamics, Phys. Rev. B106, 094433 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Ivakhnenko, S

    V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nonadi- abatic Landau-Zener-St¨ uckelberg-Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference, Phys. Rep.995, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature reviews physics2, 229 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Rigolin and G

    G. Rigolin and G. Ortiz, Adiabatic perturbation theory and geometric phases for degenerate systems, Physical review letters104, 170406 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Rodriguez-Vega, M

    M. Rodriguez-Vega, M. Lentz, and B. Seradjeh, Flo- quet perturbation theory: formalism and application to low-frequency limit, New Journal of Physics20, 093022 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Keldysh field theory for driven open quantum systems, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 096001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Zhang, F

    R. Zhang, F. Nathan, N. H. Lindner, and M. S. Rudner, Achieving quantized transport in floquet topological in- sulators via energy filters, Physical Review B110, 075428 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Mosallanejad, Y

    V. Mosallanejad, Y. Wang, and W. Dou, Floquet non- equilibrium green’s function and floquet quantum master equation for electronic transport: The role of electron– electron interactions and spin current with circular light, The Journal of Chemical Physics160(2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    The Supplemental Material includes the detailed deriva- tions of the solution ofc n and effective Lagrangian

    work page

  55. [55]

    P. A. Dirac, Note on exchange phenomena in the thomas atom, inMathematical proceedings of the Cam- bridge philosophical society, Vol. 26 (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1930) pp. 376–385

    work page 1930

  56. [56]

    Raab, On the Dirac–Frenkel/McLachlan variational principle, Chem

    A. Raab, On the Dirac–Frenkel/McLachlan variational principle, Chem. Phys. Lett.319, 674 (2000)

    work page 2000

  57. [57]

    Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Ren, Momentum-space metric tensor from nona- diabatic evolution of bloch electrons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06439 (2025)

    Y. Ren, Momentum-space metric tensor from nona- diabatic evolution of bloch electrons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06439 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Analogue gravity, Living Reviews in Relativity14, 3 (2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Mehraeen, Quantum response theory and momentum- space gravity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06160 (2025)

    M. Mehraeen, Quantum response theory and momentum- space gravity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06160 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Onishi, N

    Y. Onishi, N. Paul, and L. Fu, Emergent gravity and gravitational lensing in quantum materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04335 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Yoshida and Y

    H. Yoshida and Y. Takehito, Emergent-gravity Hall effect from quantum geometry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18458 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Verlinde, On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 1 (2011)

    E. Verlinde, On the origin of gravity and the laws of newton, Journal of High Energy Physics2011, 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    E. P. Verlinde, Emergent gravity and the dark universe, SciPost Physics2, 016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Dong and Q

    L. Dong and Q. Niu, Geometrodynamics of electrons in a crystal under position and time-dependent deformation, Phys. Rev. B98, 115162 (2018)

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    A. Li, L. Dong, and Q. Niu, Geodynamics in spacetime crystal under slow perturbation and deformation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16918 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Jiang and A

    Q.-D. Jiang and A. Balatsky, Geometric induction in chi- ral superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 016801 (2022)

    work page 2022