Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 45 references

Automatic Identification and Description of Jewelry Through Computer Vision and Neural Networks for Translators and Interpreters

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a CNN-RNN encoder-decoder model can identify jewelry in images and generate natural-language descriptions at three levels of detail, with a best test captioning accuracy of 93.45%.

desk verdict Standard captioning pipeline for jewelry with a nice dataset, but the >90% claim rests on a likely contaminated split and sloppy table arithmetic. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00661 v1 pith:FBBS44W3 submitted 2025-08-31 cs.CV

Jose Manuel Alcalde-Llergo , Aurora Ruiz-Mezcua , Rocio Avila-Ramirez , Andrea Zingoni , Juri Taborri , Enrique Yeguas-Bolivar This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords imagecaptioningaccessoryclassificationjewelryrecognitiondeeplearningcomputervisionnaturallanguagedescriptionsencoder-decodertransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a standard image-captioning pipeline can give translators and interpreters reliable descriptions of jewelry from a single photograph. It builds a custom dataset of 5,374 catalog images of earrings, necklaces, rings, and bracelets, and trains encoder-decoder models (CNN encoders with LSTM or GRU decoders) to produce captions at three levels of detail: basic type, normal material/color description, and complete commercial-style description. The central result is that the best configuration, VGG-16 with GRU, reproduces the store's original captions exactly on 93.45% of test images, which the authors count as captioning accuracy above 90%. A working three-tier interface lets a user upload an image and receive all three descriptions. The contribution is less a new architecture than a demonstration that structured, templated captioning works well in a niche visual domain with limited data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the encoder-decoder image captioning model: a pretrained CNN encoder (VGG-16 in the best configuration) maps the input image to a latent vector, and a recurrent decoder (GRU or LSTM) generates the caption token by token. The second central mechanism is the three-level linguistic template that constrains the output space—basic, normal, and complete descriptions—which makes the generation task structured enough that a small dataset can support exact-match training. Transfer learning from large pretrained CNNs is what allows the approach to work with only 5,374 images.

What would settle it

Retrain the best configuration (VGG-16 + GRU, 256 units) on an item-level split that places all photos of each jewelry item in the same fold, then compute test CCR. If it falls well below 93.45%, the reported accuracy is inflated by train/test item overlap. A second check: collect a fresh set of catalog images of pieces never used in training and measure the exact-match caption rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the discovery is that jewelry identification and description can be treated as one encoder-decoder captioning task rather than separate classification and language generation. The model's encoder turns the image into a latent vector; the decoder generates a caption word by word, constrained by one of three linguistic templates: a basic 'noun + noun' label, a normal 'adjective + noun + adjective + noun' phrase, and a complete 'superlative adjective + noun + complement' sentence. After comparing VGG-16, InceptionV3, and MobileNet encoders with LSTM and GRU decoders, the VGG-16/GRU combination with 256 hidden units reached a test Correct Classification Rate (CCR) of 0.9345

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that a random split of catalog images into training and test sets measures generalization to unseen jewelry; because the catalogs contain multiple photos of the same item and the split does not group them, the model may be recognizing pieces it already saw during training.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Translators and interpreters could query an image and receive three standardized levels of jewelry description, from 'earrings in yellow gold' to a full commercial sentence, without needing a jewelry expert.
  • The same template-constrained encoder-decoder approach could be applied to other specialized domains with small catalog datasets, such as antiques, gemstones, or cultural artifacts.
  • Exact-match caption accuracy is a workable evaluation strategy when captions follow fixed templates; for free-form captions standard metrics like BLEU or METEOR would be needed.
  • The error analysis points to shape- and material-similar classes (notably bracelets) as the main bottleneck, suggesting data or class-specific handling for such groups.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our reading: the 93.45% figure is an upper bound on generalization because multiple photos of the same physical item were allowed to straddle train and test; an item-level split would likely lower the number.
  • A natural next experiment would test the three description levels separately: basic labels should be robust under item-level splits, while complete descriptions may degrade sharply.
  • The template approach could be inverted into an attribute-extraction test: check whether each slot (material, stone, color, closure) is correctly filled, which would isolate failure modes better than whole-caption exact match.
  • If the same recipe is applied to other domains, the exact-match metric gives an upper bound on performance; without item-disjoint splits, high accuracy on catalog-style images should not be read as generalization to user photos.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an encoder–decoder image-captioning system that generates jewelry descriptions at three linguistic levels (basic, normal, complete) to assist translators and interpreters. The authors build a dataset of 5,374 images from two Córdoba jewelry store catalogs, apply geometric/photometric augmentation, and compare CNN encoders (VGG-16, InceptionV3, MobileNet) with LSTM/GRU decoders under several hyperparameter settings. The central empirical claim is that the best configuration (VGG-16 + GRU) achieves captioning accuracy exceeding 90%, with a reported test CCR of 0.9345 (Table 4). A three-tiered interface is presented as the practical output.

Significance. If the reported accuracy were valid, this would be a useful domain-specific application of image captioning, and the three-level description framework is a sensible way to match translator needs at different levels of detail. The paper also compares several architectures and reports code/model availability, which are strengths. However, the headline claim is not currently supported: the train/test split may be contaminated by multiple views of the same jewelry item, the exact-match evaluation is brittle and not decomposed by description level, and the numerical results contain inconsistencies. The contribution is therefore more promising than demonstrated, and a careful re-evaluation is required before the results can be trusted.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.3–§3.4] The test split is the load-bearing problem. Section 3.3 states that the catalogs 'included multiple images of the same jewelry item' and that these 'naturally diverse viewpoints were preserved and included in the dataset.' Section 3.4 then partitions the 5,374 images into 75/15/10 without any item-level grouping. Under a random image-level split, the same physical jewelry item—often with the same store caption—can appear in both training and test. Augmentation makes this worse, since augmented copies of one source image are not said to be kept in the same split. The reported 0.9345 test CCR may therefore reflect memorization of near-duplicate catalog views rather than generalization to unseen jewelry. The authors must re-split at the item level (e.g., by product ID or source URL) and report results with and without near-duplicate removal.
  2. [§3.4 and Table 4] The captioning evaluation is defined as exact match to the original online store captions, but no per-level breakdown is given. The paper's key innovation is three hierarchical description levels, yet 'Test CCR' in Table 4 is not identified as Basic, Normal, or Complete, and the text does not say whether separate models were trained per level or whether the reported accuracy is an average. The 'complete description after several iterations' in Section 4 is also described only verbally, with no algorithm for the iterative process. This makes the central three-level claim impossible to verify. Please report CCR separately for each level, specify the training/evaluation protocol per level, and complement exact match with standard metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE, and CIDEr, plus human assessment by translators.
  3. [Table 3] The reported F1 scores are not arithmetically consistent with the precision and recall values in the same table. For Necklaces, precision 0.9452 and recall 0.9087 give F1 ≈ 0.9266, not 0.9131; for Rings, 0.9276 and 0.9173 give F1 ≈ 0.9224, not 0.9343; for Earrings, 0.9452 and 0.9675 give F1 ≈ 0.9562, not 0.9674. The statement that all metrics exceed 91% (except bracelets) and the comparisons between classes are therefore unreliable. These values must be recomputed or the source of the discrepancy explained.
  4. [Table 4] The selection of the best captioning configuration rests on a single random split, with no error bars, confidence intervals, or repeated-seed experiments. With roughly 537 test images (10% of 5,374), the difference between VGG-16/GRU (0.9345) and VGG-16/LSTM (0.9036) corresponds to about 17 images and may be within sampling noise. Please provide bootstrap confidence intervals or results across multiple splits/seeds before claiming that one architecture is superior.
  5. [Section 4 vs. Data Availability Statement] Section 4 states that 'the database of jewelry images, along with the necessary code, are available at Jewelry Linguistics Github,' but the Data Availability Statement says the dataset 'are not publicly available due to privacy agreements.' This contradiction undermines the reproducibility claim. Please clarify exactly what is released (code? models? a sample?) and align the two statements.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 3] Use a consistent decimal notation: Table 3 uses commas (0,9452) while other tables use periods (0.9452). Also, add the number of test samples per class so the reader can gauge the stability of the reported metrics.
  2. [References] Reference [7] is cited for 'visual semantic role labeling,' but the listed paper is DeepLab (semantic segmentation). Please verify and correct the citation, or cite the actual VSRoL work.
  3. [§3.2] Minor typo: 'based-habits' should likely be 'based habits' or 'basis habits'; also 'materials’s alloy' should be 'materials’ alloys'.
  4. [Figure 1] The caption says 'Training images and captions from the final dataset,' but the dataset includes validation and test splits; clarify that these are example training images, and report the class distribution of the full dataset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the empirical captioning result rests on a held-out test split; the main validity threat is data leakage, not definitional circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical model evaluation: it builds a jewelry image dataset, trains standard CNN-RNN captioning models, and reports test CCR on a partitioned hold-out set. There is no derivation in which an output is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict. The evaluation metric (exact match to the original store caption) is the same as the training target, but that is true of all supervised captioning; the hold-out test split is the independence mechanism. The data-splitting concern raised in the skeptic note—multiple photographs of the same jewelry item are preserved and then randomly split, so near-duplicates may appear in both train and test—is a genuine external-validity/leakage risk, not a circularity: the paper provides no equation or construction by which the test accuracy equals training accuracy. The only self-citation ([14], Alcalde-Llergo et al.) supports the use of an encoder-decoder structure, but this is corroborated by standard references ([1], Vinyals et al.) and is not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The authors also explicitly acknowledge the lack of standard metrics (METEOR/BLEU/ROUGE) as a limitation, which further indicates the reported number is an empirical observation rather than a definitional consequence. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on a private dataset, an unverified split, exact-match metric, and hyperparameters chosen by validation search; no external benchmarks or new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • RNN hidden units = 512 (classification), 256 (captioning)
    Selected by validation search; controls model capacity and affects reported CCR.
  • batch size = 8 (classification), 16 (captioning)
    Selected by validation search; part of the reported best configuration.
  • learning rate = 0.001
    Best among 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 according to validation results.
  • optimizer = Adam
    Best among Adam, Adagrad, Adadelta, and RMSProp.
  • augmentation magnitudes = 90 degree rotations, 30% shifts, 15% cuts, 5% zoom, 80% brightness
    Hand-chosen augmentation parameters that shape the training data and hence the results.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Catalog captions from two jewelry stores are an adequate ground truth for caption correctness.
    Evaluation defines correct as exact match to these captions; no expert or human validation is reported.
  • domain assumption Random image-level splitting avoids train/test contamination from multiple views of the same jewelry item.
    The paper preserves multiple views of the same item but does not state that splits group by item; test validity depends on this unstated assumption.
  • domain assumption The three-level linguistic templates (Basic, Normal, Complete) capture the information translators need.
    The framework relies on Grice's maxim and levels-of-description literature, but no user study with translators validates usefulness.
  • domain assumption Standard CNN-RNN encoder-decoder models are sufficient for this task.
    The authors justify this by low resources and structured outputs; no transformer or attention baseline is run.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Automatic Identification and Description of Jewelry Through Computer Vision and Neural Networks for Translators and Interpreters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBBS44W3

@misc{pith2026250900661,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Automatic Identification and Description of Jewelry Through Computer Vision and Neural Networks for Translators and Interpreters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBBS44W3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00661}
}
read the original abstract

Identifying jewelry pieces presents a significant challenge due to the wide range of styles and designs. Currently, precise descriptions are typically limited to industry experts. However, translators and interpreters often require a comprehensive understanding of these items. In this study, we introduce an innovative approach to automatically identify and describe jewelry using neural networks. This method enables translators and interpreters to quickly access accurate information, aiding in resolving queries and gaining essential knowledge about jewelry. Our model operates at three distinct levels of description, employing computer vision techniques and image captioning to emulate expert analysis of accessories. The key innovation involves generating natural language descriptions of jewelry across three hierarchical levels, capturing nuanced details of each piece. Different image captioning architectures are utilized to detect jewels in images and generate descriptions with varying levels of detail. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in recognizing diverse types of jewelry, we assembled a comprehensive database of accessory images. The evaluation process involved comparing various image captioning architectures, focusing particularly on the encoder decoder model, crucial for generating descriptive captions. After thorough evaluation, our final model achieved a captioning accuracy exceeding 90 per cent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00661 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Training images and captions from the final dataset. In our case, we have relied on a set of catalogs provided by the Parque Joyero de Córdoba. Using these catalogs, we have created a relational database encompassing materials, precious and semi-precious stones, commonly used terms and tokens, most common meanings, colors, shapes, and common interrelationships in the creation and presentation of each piece of jewelr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the encoder–decoder model used for jewelry description. The CNN encoder (a) processes the input image of a jewelry item into a latent feature vector, which is then used to initialize the initial state of the RNN decoder (b) that generates the caption. The encoder-decoder structure is selected due to its proven effectiveness in tasks involving short, structured textual outputs, such as image captioning [1… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Jewelry image captioning interface (complete description after several iterations for gener￾ating the caption). • Basic Description: ‘A necklace with a pendant.’ • Normal Description: ‘A gold necklace with a sapphire pendant.’ • Complete Description (after several iterations): ‘This exquisite gold necklace show￾cases a beautiful sapphire pendant, adding a touch of elegance and sophistication to the accessory.’ From … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Show and tell: A neural image caption generator

    Vinyals, O.; Toshev, A.; Bengio, S.; Erhan, D. Show and tell: A neural image caption generator. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 06 2015, pp. 3156–3164. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7 298935

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7 2015

  2. [2]

    From Show to Tell: A Survey on Deep Learning-Based Image Captioning

    Stefanini, M.; Cornia, M.; Baraldi, L.; Cascianelli, S.; Fiameni, G.; Cucchiara, R. From Show to Tell: A Survey on Deep Learning-Based Image Captioning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2023, 45, 539 – 559. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3148210

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Deep Hierarchical Encoder–Decoder Network for Image Captioning

    Xiao, X.; Wang, L.; Ding, K.; Xiang, S.; Pan, C. Deep Hierarchical Encoder–Decoder Network for Image Captioning. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2019, 21, 2942–2956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2019.2915033. Appl. Sci. 2025, 1, 0 15 of 16

    work page arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution; Oxford University Press, 2002

    Jackendoff, R. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution; Oxford University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.109 3/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001

    arXiv 2002

  5. [5]

    Linear grammar as a possible stepping-stone in the evolution of language

    Jackendoff, R.; Wittenberg, E. Linear grammar as a possible stepping-stone in the evolution of language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2016, 24. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1073-y

    work page doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1073-y 2016

  6. [6]

    Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention

    Xu, K.; Ba, J.; Kiros, R.; Cho, K.; Courville, A.; Salakhutdinov, R.; Zemel, R.; Bengio, Y. Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 37 2015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1502.03044

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03044 2015

  7. [7]

    DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs

    Chen, L.C.; Papandreou, G.; Kokkinos, I.; Murphy, K.; Yuille, A. DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2016, PP. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit

    Manning, C.; Surdeanu, M.; Bauer, J.; Finkel, J.; Bethard, S.; McClosky, D. The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. In Proceedings of the The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit, 01 2014. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1 /P14-5010

    work page doi:10.3115/v1 2014

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Language and Information; Addison-Wesley Pub

    Bar-Hillel, Y. Language and Information; Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.: Reading-Mass., 1964

    1964

  2. [10]

    Aspects of Language

    Bar-Hillel, Y. Aspects of Language. Mackie, J. L. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1973, 24, 190–193, [https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/24.2.190]. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/24.2.190

    1973 doi

  3. [11]

    Linguistics for the age of AI; MIT Press: London, England, 2021

    McShane, M.; Nirenburg, S. Linguistics for the age of AI; MIT Press: London, England, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    DeepBE: Learning Deep Binary Encoding for Multi-label Classification

    Li, C.; Kang, Q.; Ge, G.; Song, Q.; Lu, H.; Cheng, J. DeepBE: Learning Deep Binary Encoding for Multi-label Classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2016, pp. 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2016.98

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    The Specular Exponent as a Criterion for Appearance Quality Assessment of Pearllike Objects by Artificial Vision

    Chen, S.Y.; Luo, G.J.; Li, X.; Ji, S.M.; Zhang, B.W. The Specular Exponent as a Criterion for Appearance Quality Assessment of Pearllike Objects by Artificial Vision. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2012, 59, 3264–3272. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE. 2011.2146213

    2012

  6. [14]

    Jewelry Recognition via Encoder-Decoder Models

    Alcalde-Llergo, J.M.; Yeguas-Bolívar, E.; Zingoni, A.; Fuerte-Jurado, A. Jewelry Recognition via Encoder-Decoder Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE). IE...

    2023

  7. [15]

    CgT-GAN: CLIP-guided Text GAN for Image Captioning

    Yu, J.; Li, H.; Hao, Y.; Zhu, B.; Xu, T.; He, X. CgT-GAN: CLIP-guided Text GAN for Image Captioning. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 2023, MM ’23, p. 2252–2263. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3581783.3611891

    2023

  8. [16]

    Speaking the Same Language: Matching Machine to Human Captions by Adversarial Training

    Shetty, R.; Rohrbach, M.; Hendricks, L.A.; Fritz, M.; Schiele, B. Speaking the Same Language: Matching Machine to Human Captions by Adversarial Training. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, 2017, p. 4155–4164. https://doi.o...

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Distinctive Image Captioning: Leveraging Ground Truth Captions in CLIP Guided Reinforce- ment Learning, 2024

    Chaffin, A.; Kijak, E.; Claveau, V . Distinctive Image Captioning: Leveraging Ground Truth Captions in CLIP Guided Reinforce- ment Learning, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV .2402.13936

    2024 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Image captioning based on deep reinforcement learning

    Shi, H.; Li, P .; Wang, B.; Wang, Z. Image captioning based on deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service. ACM, 2018, ICIMCS’18, p. 1–5. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3240876.3240900

    2018

  11. [19]

    Deep Learning Approaches on Image Captioning: A Review

    Ghandi, T.; Pourreza, H.; Mahyar, H. Deep Learning Approaches on Image Captioning: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys 2023, 56, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617592

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Towards generating textual summaries of graphs

    McCoy, K.F.; Carberry, S.; Roper, T.; Green, N.L. Towards generating textual summaries of graphs. In Proceedings of the Universal Access In HCI: Towards an Information Society for All, Proceedings of HCI International ’2001 (the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer I...

    2001

  13. [21]

    Logic and conversation; Vol

    Grice, H.P . Logic and conversation; Vol. 3, Academic Press, 1975; pp. 41–58

    1975

  14. [22]

    Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension

    Dijk, T.v. Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. Cognitive processes in comprehension 1977, pp. 3–32

    1977

  15. [23]

    Corpora and theories of linguistic performance

    Leech, G. Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 82; Svartvik, J., Ed.; Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin/New York, 1992; Vol. 65,Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, p. 105–122

    1992

  16. [24]

    In Deconstructing constructions; 2009; pp

    Mairal, R.; Ruiz de Mendoza, F., Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In Deconstructing constructions; 2009; pp. 153–198. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.08lev

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    Semantic macro-structures and macro-rules in visual discourse processing Semantic macro-structures and macro-rules in visual discourse processing

    Abdel-Raheem, A. Semantic macro-structures and macro-rules in visual discourse processing Semantic macro-structures and macro-rules in visual discourse processing. Visual Studies 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2021.1940260

    2021

  18. [26]

    Attention Is All You Need

    Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, L.; Polosukhin, I. Attention Is All You Need. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017); Guyon, I.; Luxburg, U.; Bengio, S.; Wallach, H.; Fergus, R...

    2017 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bender, E.M.; Gebru, T.; McMillan-Major, A.; Shmitchell, S. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, New York, NY, USA, 2021; FAccT ’21, p. ...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Kazakh jewelry: problems of translation and creation of a multilingual thesaurus

    Kozhakhmetova, G.A.; Tazhibayeva, S. Kazakh jewelry: problems of translation and creation of a multilingual thesaurus. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. PHILOLOGY Series 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Targeting Ion Beam Analysis techniques for gold artefacts

    Demortier, G. Targeting Ion Beam Analysis techniques for gold artefacts. ArchéoSciences 2009, 33, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.400 0/archeosciences.1955

    2009

  22. [30]

    Research on innovative application of silver material in modern jewelry design

    Yu, Qinqin.; Meng, Kaining.; Guo, Juanling. Research on innovative application of silver material in modern jewelry design. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 176, 02013. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817602013

    2018

  23. [31]

    Plan estratégico del sistema productivo local de la joyería de Córdoba; 2006

    Ariza-Montes, A. Plan estratégico del sistema productivo local de la joyería de Córdoba; 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    Joyería Marthita

    Arellano, N.; Espinoza, A.; Perdomo, D.; Carpio, L. Joyería Marthita. DSpace en ESPOL Unidades Académicas Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas. Artículos de Tesis de Grado 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    Competitividad entre joyerías y tiendas de bisutería fina legalmente constituidas,

    Díaz, A.; Aguilar, D.; Blandón, J.; Estela, B. Competitividad entre joyerías y tiendas de bisutería fina legalmente constituidas,

  26. [34]

    The effect of celebrity endorsement on consumer behavior: Case of the Lebanese jewelry industry

    Hani, S.; Marwan, A.; Andre, A. The effect of celebrity endorsement on consumer behavior: Case of the Lebanese jewelry industry. Arab Economic and Business Journal 2018, 13, 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2018.11.002

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Hernández, J.; Leal, A. Proyecto de comercialización e internacionalización de productos derivados de la orfebrería y joyería de plata procedente de Taxco Guerrero con destino a San Diego California EEUU, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Language Descriptions, 2004

    Liddicoat, A.J.; Curnow, T.J. Language Descriptions, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch1

    2004 doi

  29. [37]

    A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning, 2019

    Zhuang, F.; Qi, Z.; Duan, K.; Xi, D.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Xiong, H.; He, Q. A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.02685

    2019 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    End-to-End Transformer Based Model for Image Captioning

    Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Sun, Y. End-to-End Transformer Based Model for Image Captioning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth aaai conference on artificial intelligence. Assoc Advancement Artificial Intelligence, 2022, AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2585–2594

    2022

  31. [39]

    Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition

    Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv 1409.1556 2014

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision

    Szegedy, C.; Vanhoucke, V .; Ioffe, S.; Shlens, J.; Wojna, Z. Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 2818–2826. https: //doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.308

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications

    Howard, A.; Zhu, M.; Chen, B.; Kalenichenko, D.; Wang, W.; Weyand, T.; Andreetto, M.; Adam, H. MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications. International Journal of Intelligence Science 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    Long Short-term Memory

    Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long Short-term Memory. Neural computation 1997, 9, 1735–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.19 97.9.8.1735

    1997 doi

  35. [43]

    On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches

    Cho, K.; Merrienboer, B.; Bahdanau, D.; Bengio, Y. On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches. ACL Anthology 2014. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-4012

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    A thorough review of models, evaluation metrics, and datasets on image captioning

    Luo, G.; Cheng, L.; Jing, C.; Zhao, C.; Song, G. A thorough review of models, evaluation metrics, and datasets on image captioning. IET Image Processing 2022, 16, 311–332, [https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1049/ipr2.12367]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org...

    2022 doi

  37. [2013]

    Revista Científica de FAREM-Estelí 2014, p. 35. https://doi.org/10.5377/farem.v0i9.2426

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.