Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from a Tin-Vacancy Center in Diamond

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Tin-vacancy single photons from diamond are shifted to the telecom S-band at 1480 nm with 48% internal conversion efficiency, preserving the emitter's lifetime.

desk verdict First SnV-to-telecom QFC with solid efficiency/noise numbers; the single-photon claim rests on lifetime matching rather than a direct post-conversion g(2), which is the main thing to ask for in revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01661 v1 pith:XSY5UWUF submitted 2025-09-01 quant-ph

Julia M. Brevoord , Jan Fabian Geus , Tim Turan , Miguel Guerrero Romero , Daniel Bedialauneta Rodríguez , Nina Codreanu , Alexander M. Stramma , Ronald Hanson
show 2 more authors
Florian Elsen Bernd Jungbluth
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 42.65.Ky03.67.Hk
keywords quantumfrequencyconversiontin-vacancycenterdiamondtelecomS-bandsinglephotonsnetworksKTAcrystalzero-phononline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum frequency conversion is the missing link between color-center quantum emitters and low-loss telecom fiber networks. This paper tries to show that the tin-vacancy (SnV) center in diamond can make that link: its 619 nm photons are down-converted to 1480 nm using a 1064 nm pump in a KTA crystal inside an optical cavity. The authors report 48% internal conversion efficiency, a low and spectrally flat noise floor, and a conversion bandwidth wide enough to track shifts and inhomogeneity in SnV emission. Converting actual single SnV photons, they observe telecom photons with the same 7.58 ns lifetime as the original emission, which they take as proof that the photons survive the conversion process. If correct, this would let SnV-based quantum nodes connect over metropolitan-scale fiber, not just in a lab.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is difference-frequency three-wave mixing in a bulk potassium titanyl arsenate (KTA) crystal: a 619 nm photon and a 1064 nm pump photon are combined under type-II birefringent phase matching (crystal angle φ=40°) to produce a 1480 nm telecom photon, with the output wavelength fixed by energy conservation. The crystal sits in a bow-tie cavity that enhances the 9 W pump to over 350 W circulating power, actively stabilized by the Hänsch-Couillaud locking technique; the high pump power drives conversion efficiency, while polarization filtering, long-pass filters, a 12 nm bandpass, and a 5 GHz fiber Bragg grating strip away pump-scattering and SPDC noise.

What would settle it

Measure the second-order correlation g(2)(τ) of the converted telecom stream. With single SnV photons, the zero-delay dip should remain below 1 after background correction, as it does for the unconverted light (g(2)(0)=0.298); if the converted signal is dominated by noise mimicking the lifetime, g(2)(0) will climb toward 1. Equivalently, block the SnV excitation and check that no pulsed 7.58 ns component remains.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that a cavity-enhanced difference-frequency conversion stage can take single photons from a waveguide-embedded SnV center in diamond, emitted on the 619 nm zero-phonon line, and shift them to 1480 nm in the telecom S-band with an internal conversion efficiency of (48±3)% and external efficiency of (28±2)%, while holding pump-induced noise to (2.2±0.9) counts/s/pm. The evidence is threefold: classical-laser measurements set the efficiency and the 70 GHz bandwidth over which efficiency stays above 80% of its maximum; noise characterization identifies spontaneous parametric down-conversion as the dominant background and shows it spectrally flat; an

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the telecom photons come from the SnV center rests entirely on the measured decay time matching the emitter's lifetime; if the background counts produced a similar exponential shape, the same histogram could appear without genuine conversion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SnV centers, which already have good spin-photon properties and nanophotonic integration, become compatible with low-loss telecom fiber: their 619 nm emission can be moved to 1480 nm without changing the emitter's lifetime signature.
  • Because conversion efficiency stays above 80% of its maximum over 70 GHz and the pump wavelength can be tuned, a single fixed-output converter can serve SnV centers whose emission is shifted by strain or drift.
  • The demonstrated external efficiency of 28% and noise of 2.2 counts/s/pm put the signal-to-noise budget for telecom conversion within reach of what metropolitan entanglement demonstrations require.
  • The conversion stage adds a known, fixed photon loss (signal reduced to 0.04, dominated by conversion and coupling) rather than a fundamental limit; improving pump enhancement or impedance matching should raise the external efficiency toward the internal 48%.
  • The result is a step toward a metropolitan-scale, fiber-based quantum network built from SnV centers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A post-conversion g(2) measurement is the natural missing check: if it shows a zero-delay dip after background correction, the converter preserves single-photon statistics, not just lifetime, and remote indistinguishability tests become possible.
  • The flat noise spectrum and pump-wavelength tunability suggest the same converter could act as a wavelength hub, translating several different emitters into one telecom channel; that is an extension beyond what the paper demonstrates.
  • Because the observed efficiency did not follow the expected sin²(P) trend and showed no saturation, the data hint that thermal or alignment effects, not the nonlinear interaction, are currently limiting performance; optimizing those could push internal efficiency beyond 48%.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports quantum frequency conversion (QFC) of 619 nm zero-phonon-line photons from tin-vacancy (SnV) centers in diamond to the telecom S-band at 1480 nm, using a cavity-enhanced KTA crystal pumped at 1064 nm. The authors report an internal conversion efficiency of (48 ± 3)% and an external efficiency of (28 ± 2)%, a noise density of (2.2 ± 0.9) cts/s/pm that is spectrally flat over 40 GHz, and a conversion bandwidth of 70 GHz at >80% of maximum efficiency. In the final experiment, a train of photons from a single waveguide-embedded SnV center is sent through the QFC, and the converted telecom photons exhibit an exponential decay with lifetime (7.58 ± 0.14) ns, matching the pre-conversion lifetime of (7.47 ± 0.11) ns. This lifetime match is presented as confirmation of successful single-photon conversion.

Significance. If confirmed, this is an important enabling result for SnV-based metropolitan quantum networks: it demonstrates efficient, low-noise frequency conversion from the visible to telecom, with a noise level suitable for single-photon operation. The efficiency and noise values are supported by direct power and count-rate measurements, and the data and analysis code are publicly available, which is a strength. However, the central claim that single photons from the SnV center have been converted and detected is not directly verified by post-conversion photon statistics; the evidence is an inferred association based on lifetime matching. This gap is load-bearing for the title and abstract and needs to be addressed before the paper can be considered fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. I D, Fig. 6] The claim that "we have successfully converted photons originating from an SnV center" rests on the exponential fit in Fig. 6, which yields tau = (7.58 ± 0.14) ns and a constant background B = (102 ± 3) cts/s. This interpretation assumes that the 102 cts/s background is temporally flat on the nanosecond scale. No noise-only time-resolved trace is shown with the 532 nm excitation train running and the 619 nm input blocked. A time-correlated background (e.g., pulsed-laser-induced fluorescence, afterpulsing, or nonlinear mixing of the 532 nm pulses with the 1064 nm pump) could produce an apparent decay resembling the SnV lifetime. The pre-conversion g(2)(0) = 0.298 only certifies the source, not the converted telecom field. I recommend adding a post-conversion g(2) measurement or a directly measured noise-only histogram; alternatively, the title and abstract should be revised to avoid claim
  2. [Sec. I B, Fig. 2(a), Eq. (2)] The measured conversion efficiency increases linearly with pump power rather than following the expected sin^2(L sqrt(alpha P)) dependence of Eq. (2). The authors note this as an "unaccounted dependency" and invoke thermal effects as a possible cause. This is a concern because the quoted "maximum" efficiency at 360 W is a maximum over the measured range, not a true saturation value, and the unmodeled pump-power dependence could indicate systematic effects that also affect the efficiency determination. The efficiency values themselves are direct measurements and remain useful, but the manuscript should either provide a quantitative account of the linear behavior or clearly state that the quoted efficiencies are operating-point values rather than fundamental limits.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. I D, Fig. 6] The small periodic peaks in Figure 6 are attributed to "electronic or optical reflections" but are not explained further. A brief comment on their spacing and origin would be helpful for assessing possible systematic effects on the fit.
  2. [Sec. I C, Fig. 3(b)] The x-axis label "Filter freq. [GHz + 202400 GHz]" is unconventional. Please specify the absolute center frequency or use a clear detuning axis.
  3. [Sec. I B, Fig. 2(a)] As noted in the major comments, the word "maximum" should be qualified as "maximum measured" given the linear pump-power dependence and the absence of saturation in the data.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical and formatting issues: "crystal‘s cut orientation" contains a nonstandard apostrophe, "H¨ ansch-Couillaud" should be typeset consistently, and the abstract includes a line break in "SnV − center" that should be repaired.
  5. [Sec. I D] The statement that the filter FWHM of 36.5 pm and the noise density of 2.2 cts/s/pm "yield ~73 cts/s noise counts" appears numerically inconsistent (2.2 x 36.5 ≈ 80). Please check the arithmetic and clarify the calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central results are direct measurements, and the self-citations are apparatus provenance, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are direct measurements, not derived predictions. The internal/external conversion efficiencies are measured power ratios (Sec. I B, Fig. 2); the noise density is a measured count rate normalized by detector efficiency and filter bandwidth (Eq. 3, Fig. 3); and the converted-photon lifetime is an exponential fit to a measured time-resolved histogram (Fig. 6). Nothing in the derivation chain defines a predicted quantity in terms of the fitted inputs: the unconverted SnV lifetime (7.47 ns) is used only as a comparison value, not as a constraint on the fit to the converted histogram. The QFC setup is adapted from the authors' prior work (Refs. [33], [16]), but this is physical apparatus provenance, not a mathematical or empirical premise that forces the reported efficiency or noise numbers. The single-photon claim rests on a pre-conversion pulsed g(2) measurement and the post-conversion lifetime match; even if one regards the absence of a post-conversion g(2) as an evidential gap, that is a limitation of the inference, not a circular reduction of the claim to its own inputs. The formula η_QFC = η_max sin²(L√αP) is a standard model cited to Ref. [35] and is used only to discuss the observed power scaling, not to construct the reported result. No self-definitional step, fitted parameter relabeled as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are direct experimental measurements. Free parameters are limited to standard exponential and bunching fits used for emitter characterization. The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on established nonlinear optics, prior fabrication work on SnV waveguides, and standard analysis methods.

free parameters (2)
  • Exponential decay fit parameters for lifetime histograms (A, B, tau) = Pre-conversion: tau = 7.47 ± 0.11 ns, A = 54394 ± 1112 cts/s, B = 22 ± 8 cts/s. Post-conversion: tau = 7.58 ± 0.14 ns, A
    Fitted to the time-resolved photon histograms in Fig. 5(a) and Fig. 6. These characterize the emitter and converted signal; they do not enter the conversion efficiency or noise density determination.
  • Bunching fit parameters for g(2) (A, tau) = A = 0.51 ± 0.04, tau = 7.50 ± 0.85 pulses
    Fitted to the pulsed second-order correlation in Fig. 5(b) to extract g(2)(0) = 0.298 ± 0.004. Characterization only; not used in the central conversion claims.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Three-wave mixing in KTA with birefringent type-II phase matching at 40 degrees converts 619 nm + 1064 nm to 1480 nm (Eq. 1).
    The entire conversion concept relies on this nonlinear optical process and the crystal geometry. It is standard established physics, but no direct measurement of phase matching angle is provided in this paper.
  • domain assumption The matched decay time of the converted telecom photons identifies them as originating from the SnV center.
    Section I.D and Fig. 6. Without a post-conversion g(2) or spectral fingerprint, the attribution to the SnV center rests on the lifetime being indistinguishable from the pre-conversion value.
  • domain assumption Noise in the QFC output is dominated by SPDC of the pump and is spectrally flat over the measured range.
    Section I.C and Fig. 3. The noise density is normalized by detector efficiency and filter bandwidth; flatness is inferred from the weak frequency dependence in Fig. 3(b).
  • standard math The conversion efficiency follows the standard model eta = eta_max sin^2(L sqrt(alpha P)), as given in Eq. (2).
    The paper uses this model to discuss the pump-power dependence. The data deviate from this model (linear rather than sin^2), but the measured peak efficiency is a direct ratio of powers, not derived from the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from a Tin-Vacancy Center in Diamond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XSY5UWUF

@misc{pith2026250901661,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from a Tin-Vacancy Center in Diamond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XSY5UWUF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01661}
}
read the original abstract

Diamond tin-vacancy (SnV) centers are promising candidates for building quantum network nodes. However, their native photon emission at 619 nm is incompatible with metropolitan-scale networks operating at low-loss telecom wavelengths. To address this, we demonstrate highly efficient, low-noise quantum frequency conversion (QFC) of 619 nm photons to the telecom S-band at 1480 nm. The conversion process combines 619 nm photons with 1064 nm pump light in an actively stabilized cavity containing a bulk monocrystalline potassium titanyl arsenate (KTA) crystal. We achieve an internal (external) conversion efficiency of (48 +/- 3)% ((28 +/- 2)%) and a noise photon rate per wavelength of 2.2 +/- 0.9 cts/s/pm, which is spectrally flat in the investigated frequency range of 40 GHz. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the efficiency remains above 80% of its maximum over a frequency range of 70 GHz. Finally, we generate a string of photons from a single waveguide-embedded SnV center using a train of excitation pulses and send these through the QFC. After the QFC, we observe a string of telecom photons displaying the SnV lifetime, confirming successful conversion. These results represent a critical step towards metropolitan-scale fiber-based quantum networks using SnV centers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01661 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the conversion efficiency as a function of circulating pump power. At a circulating pump power of (360 ± 17)W, an internal efficiency of (48 ± 3) % is achieved. The error bars are calculated from the accuracy of the power measurements. A maximum external efficiency of (28 ± 2) % is observed at a pump power of (344 ± 16)W in the cavity. The conversion efficiency ηQFC for a nonlinear material of length L is … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: SnV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Above-Unity Coherent Cooperativity of Tin-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Photonic Crystal Cavities

    quant-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Single tin-vacancy centers in diamond photonic-crystal cavities show coherent cooperativity up to 8.3, the first above-unity coherent coupling for this emitter type.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, 6412 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Ekert and R

    A. Ekert and R. Renner, The ultimate physical limits of privacy, Nature 507, 443 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Jiang, J

    L. Jiang, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, Distributed quantum computation based on small quantum registers, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062323 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer-Baseline Telescopes Using Quantum Repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Buhrman, R

    H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. d. Wolf, Quantum Fingerprinting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167902 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Bernien, B

    H. Bernien, B. Hensen, W. Pfaff, G. Koolstra, M. S. Blok, L. Robledo, T. H. Taminiau, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, L. Childress, and R. Hanson, Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres, Nature 497, 86 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Hofmann, M

    J. Hofmann, M. Krug, N. Ortegel, L. G´ erard, M. Weber, W. Rosenfeld, and H. Weinfurter, Heralded Entanglement Between Widely Separated Atoms, Science 337, 6090 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    D. L. Moehring, P. Maunz, S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. N. Matsukevich, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Entanglement of Single-Atom Quantum Bits at a Distance, Nature 449, 7158 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    Ritter, C

    S. Ritter, C. N¨ olleke, C. Hahn, A. Reiserer, A. Neuzner, M. Uphoff, M. M¨ ucke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, and G. Rempe, An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities, Nature 484, 195 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    M. H. Abobeih, Y. Wang, J. Randall, S. J. H. Loenen, C. E. Bradley, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, B. M. Terhal, and T. H. Taminiau, Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a diamond quantum processor, Nature 606, 884 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Bradley, J

    C. Bradley, J. Randall, M. Abobeih, R. Berrevoets, M. Degen, M. Bakker, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. Taminiau, A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute, Phys. Rev. X 9, 3 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Pompili, S

    M. Pompili, S. L. N. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. C. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. d. S. Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits, Science 372, 6539 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    S. L. N. Hermans, M. Pompili, H. K. C. Beukers, S. Baier, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Qubit teleportation between non-neighbouring nodes in a quantum network, Nature 605, 663 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    L. Li, L. De Santis, I. B. W. Harris, K. C. Chen, Y. Gao, I. Christen, H. Choi, M. Trusheim, Y. Song, C. Errando-Herranz, J. Du, Y. Hu, G. Clark, M. I. Ibrahim, G. Gilbert, R. Han, and D. Englund, Heterogeneous integration of spin–photon interfaces with a CMOS platform, Nature...

    2024

  8. [16]

    A. J. Stolk, K. L. v. d. Enden, M.-C. Slater, I. t. Raa-Derckx, P. Botma, J. v. Rantwijk, J. J. B. Biemond, R. A. J. Hagen, R. W. Herfst, W. D. Koek, A. J. H. Meskers, R. Vollmer, E. J. v. Zwet, M. Markham, A. M. Edmonds, J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, B. Jungbluth, C. Haefner, C. Tres...

    2024

  9. [17]

    C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. Assumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, N. Sinclair, C. De-Eknamkul, D. S. Levonian, M. K. Bhaskar, H. Park, M. Lonˇ car, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory no...

    2024

  10. [18]

    H. K. Beukers, M. Pasini, H. Choi, D. Englund, R. Hanson, and J. Borregaard, Remote-Entanglement Protocols for Stationary Qubits with Photonic Interfaces, PRX Quantum 5, 010202 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Daiss, S

    S. Daiss, S. Langenfeld, S. Welte, E. Distante, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, O. Morin, and G. Rempe, A Quantum-Logic Gate between Distant Quantum-Network Modules, Science 371, 6529 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Meraner, J. Schupp, V. Krcmarsky, H. Hainzer, and B. P. Lanyon, Light-matter entanglement over 50 km of optical fibre, npj Quantum Inf 5, 72 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Tchebotareva, S

    A. Tchebotareva, S. L. Hermans, P. C. Humphreys, D. Voigt, P. J. Harmsma, L. K. Cheng, A. L. Verlaan, N. Dijkhuizen, W. De Jong, A. Dr´ eau, and R. Hanson, Entanglement between a Diamond Spin Qubit and a Photonic Time-Bin Qubit at Telecom Wavelength, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 0636...

    2019

  14. [22]

    Stolk, K

    A. Stolk, K. van der Enden, M.-C. Roehsner, A. Teepe, S. Faes, C. Bradley, S. Cadot, J. van Rantwijk, I. te Raa, R. Hagen, A. Verlaan, J. Biemond, A. Khorev, R. Vollmer, M. Markham, A. Edmonds, J. Morits, T. Taminiau, E. van Zwet, and R. Hanson, Telecom-Band Quantum Interferen...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Iwasaki, Y

    T. Iwasaki, Y. Miyamoto, T. Taniguchi, P. Siyushev, M. H. Metsch, F. Jelezko, and M. Hatano, Tin-Vacancy Quantum Emitters in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 253601 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Herrmann, J

    Y. Herrmann, J. Fischer, J. M. Brevoord, C. Sauerzapf, L. G. Wienhoven, L. J. Feije, M. Pasini, M. Eschen, M. Ruf, M. J. Weaver, and R. Hanson, Coherent Coupling of a Diamond Tin-Vacancy Center to a Tunable Open Microcavity, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041013 (2024). 9

    2024

  17. [25]

    Karapatzakis, J

    I. Karapatzakis, J. Resch, M. Schrodin, P. Fuchs, M. Kieschnick, J. Heupel, L. Kussi, C. S¨ urgers, C. Popov, J. Meijer, C. Becher, W. Wernsdorfer, and D. Hunger, Microwave Control of the Tin-Vacancy Spin Qubit in Diamond with a Superconducting Waveguide, Phys. Rev. X 14, 0310...

    2024

  18. [26]

    X. Guo, A. M. Stramma, Z. Li, W. G. Roth, B. Huang, Y. Jin, R. A. Parker, J. Arjona Mart ´ ınez, N. Shofer, C. P. Michaels, C. P. Purser, M. H. Appel, E. M. Alexeev, T. Liu, A. C. Ferrari, D. D. Awschalom, N. Delegan, B. Pingault, G. Galli, F. J. Heremans, M. Atat¨ ure, and A....

    2023

  19. [27]

    E. I. Rosenthal, C. P. Anderson, H. C. Kleidermacher, A. J. Stein, H. Lee, J. Grzesik, G. Scuri, A. E. Rugar, D. Riedel, S. Aghaeimeibodi, G. H. Ahn, K. Van Gasse, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Microwave Spin Control of a Tin-Vacancy Qubit in Diamond, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031022 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Thiering and A

    G. Thiering and A. Gali, Ab Initio Magneto-Optical Spectrum of Group-IV Vacancy Color Centers in Diamond, Physical Review X 8, 021063 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    A. E. Rugar, S. Aghaeimeibodi, D. Riedel, C. Dory, H. Lu, P. J. McQuade, Z.-X. Shen, N. A. Melosh, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Quantum Photonic Interface for Tin-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031021 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Arjona Mart ´ ınez, R

    J. Arjona Mart ´ ınez, R. A. Parker, K. C. Chen, C. M. Purser, L. Li, C. P. Michaels, A. M. Stramma, R. Debroux, I. B. Harris, M. Hayhurst Appel, E. C. Nichols, M. E. Trusheim, D. A. Gangloff, D. Englund, and M. Atat¨ ure, Photonic Indistinguishability of the Tin-Vacancy Cente...

    2022

  23. [31]

    QuTech Part II Applied-oriented research

    for details. Resonant excitation of the SnV − is performed using a Toptica DLC TA-SHG Pro laser at 619 nm from a free-space objective above the sample. Off-resonant excitation is provided using either a continuous-wave laser (Cobolt 06-MLD, 515 nm) or a pulsed laser (NKT Onefi...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Pasini, N

    M. Pasini, N. Codreanu, T. Turan, A. Riera Moral, C. F. Primavera, L. De Santis, H. K. C. Beukers, J. M. Brevoord, C. Waas, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Nonlinear Quantum Photonics with a Tin-Vacancy Center Coupled to a One- Dimensional Diamond Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Clark, H

    G. Clark, H. Raniwala, M. Koppa, K. Chen, A. Leenheer, M. Zimmermann, M. Dong, L. Li, Y. H. Wen, D. Dominguez, M. Trusheim, G. Gilbert, M. Eichenfield, and D. Englund, Nanoelectromechanical Control of Spin–Photon Interfaces in a Hybrid Quantum System on Chip, Nano Letters 24, 4 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    J. F. Geus, F. Elsen, S. Nyga, A. J. Stolk, K. L. van der Enden, E. J. van Zwet, C. Haefner, R. Hanson, and B. Jungbluth, Low-noise short-wavelength pumped frequency downconversion for quantum frequency converters, Optica Quantum 2, 189 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    T. W. H¨ ansch and B. Couillaud, Laser frequency stabilization by polarization spectroscopy of a reflecting reference cavity, Optics Communications 35, 441 (1980)

    1980

  28. [36]

    R. V. Roussev, C. Langrock, J. R. Kurz, and M. M. Fejer, Periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide sum-frequency generator for efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths, Optics letters 29, 1518 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    J. M. Brevoord, L. G. C. Wienhoven, N. Codreanu, T. Ishiguro, E. van Leeuwen, M. Iuliano, L. De Santis, C. Waas, H. K. C. Beukers, T. Turan, C. Errando-Herranz, K. Kawaguchi, and R. Hanson, Large-range tuning and stabilization of the optical transition of diamond tin-vacancy c...

    2025

  30. [38]

    G¨ orlitz, D

    J. G¨ orlitz, D. Herrmann, G. Thiering, P. Fuchs, M. Gandil, T. Iwasaki, T. Taniguchi, M. Kieschnick, J. Meijer, M. Hatano, A. Gali, and C. Becher, Spectroscopic investigations of negatively charged tin-vacancy centres in diamond, New J. Phys. 22, 013048 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Narita, P

    Y. Narita, P. Wang, K. Ikeda, K. Oba, Y. Miyamoto, T. Taniguchi, S. Onoda, M. Hatano, and T. Iwasaki, Multiple Tin-Vacancy Centers in Diamond with Nearly Identical Photon Frequency and Linewidth, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 024061 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Bushmakin, O

    V. Bushmakin, O. v. Berg, C. Sauerzapf, S. Jayaram, A. Denisenko, V. Vorobyov, I. Gerhardt, D. Liu, and J. Wrachtrup, Two-Photon Interference of Photons from Remote Tin-Vacancy Centers in Diamond (2024), arXiv:2412.17539

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    C. K. Hong and L. Mandel, Theory of parametric frequency down conversion of light, Physical review. A, General physics 31, 2409 (1985)

    1985

  34. [42]

    M. Ruf, M. Weaver, S. van Dam, and R. Hanson, Resonant Excitation and Purcell Enhancement of Coherent Nitrogen- Vacancy Centers Coupled to a Fabry-Perot Microcavity, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 024049 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    J. M. Brevoord, J. F. Geus, T. Turan, M. Guerrero Romero, D. Bedialauneta Rodr ´ ıguez, N. Codreanu, A. M. Stramma, R. Hanson, F. Elsen, and B. Jungbluth, Data underlying the publication ”Quantum Frequency Conversion of Single Photons from a Tin-Vacancy Center in Diamond” (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.