arxiv: 2509.01677 · v4 · submitted 2025-09-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Machine Learning in the 2HDM2S model for Dark Matter

Rafael Boto , Tiago P. Rebelo , Jorge C. Rom\~ao , Jo\~ao P. Silva This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords dark mattertwo Higgs doublet modelscalar singletsevolutionary strategiesmachine learningparameter space explorationbeyond Standard Model

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Evolutionary strategies efficiently identify viable dark matter regions in a two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the two-Higgs-doublet model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the 2HDM2S model, which adds two real scalar singlets to the two-Higgs-doublet framework, and works through its vacuum stability conditions, oblique parameters, unitarity bounds, and experimental limits from colliders and dark matter searches. It then compares three approaches to mapping the allowed parameter space: purely random sampling, sampling that begins near the alignment limit, and a machine-learning search that employs evolutionary strategies. The central result is that the evolutionary-strategies method locates points with a viable dark matter candidate more efficiently than the other two techniques. A reader would care because such models offer concrete particle-physics explanations for dark matter, and better search methods can reveal which parameter regions remain consistent with all existing data.

Core claim

The authors establish that, in the 2HDM2S model, evolutionary strategies constitute an effective tool for locating regions of parameter space that contain a viable dark matter candidate while satisfying vacuum, unitarity, oblique-parameter, collider, and dark-matter experimental constraints, and that this approach outperforms both random population and alignment-limit scans in identifying such regions.

What carries the argument

Evolutionary Strategies, a population-based optimization algorithm that iteratively evolves sets of candidate parameter points to satisfy the full set of theoretical and experimental requirements on the 2HDM2S model.

If this is right

The 2HDM2S model admits parameter regions in which one of the new scalars serves as a viable dark matter candidate after all listed constraints are imposed.
Evolutionary strategies locate these viable dark-matter regions with fewer sampled points than random or alignment-restricted scans require.
Machine-learning searches can be used alongside conventional scans to map the allowed space of extended Higgs models more completely.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same evolutionary-strategies pipeline could be applied directly to other scalar extensions that also contain a dark-matter candidate.
Combining evolutionary strategies with additional machine-learning techniques might further reduce the number of points that must be evaluated against collider and direct-detection data.

Load-bearing premise

The evolutionary strategy is assumed to converge to the true set of viable dark-matter regions without systematically missing qualitatively different solutions that would appear under other sampling methods.

What would settle it

Discovery of a viable dark-matter point by a random or alignment-limit scan that the evolutionary-strategies procedure consistently fails to locate would falsify the claimed efficiency.

read the original abstract

We introduce a two real scalar singlet extension of the two Higgs doublet model. We study the vacuum structure, the bounded from below conditions, the restrictions from the oblique parameters S,T and U, as well as the unitarity constraints. We submit the model to collider and Dark Matter experimental constraints and explore its allowed parameter space. We compare randomly populated simulations, simulations starting near the alignment limit, and a Machine Learning based exploration. Using Evolutionary Strategies, we efficiently search for regions with a viable Dark Matter candidate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The 2HDM2S model with evolutionary strategies gives some new DM benchmark points but the efficiency claim rests on an untested convergence assumption.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors extend the two-Higgs-doublet model by two real scalar singlets and apply evolutionary strategies to locate parameter regions that satisfy vacuum stability, unitarity, oblique parameters, collider limits, and relic density while producing a viable dark-matter candidate. They also run side-by-side comparisons with random scans and scans started near the alignment limit. This produces a concrete set of points that could serve as benchmarks for further collider or direct-detection work in this specific setup. The model definition and constraint list are laid out plainly, and the numerical approach is a straightforward application of an existing optimization technique to a new scalar extension. The 2HDM2S construction itself does not appear in the cited prior literature, so the combination is new even if the individual pieces are incremental. The soft spot is the reliance on evolutionary strategies to reach a representative sample of the allowed space. In a high-dimensional parameter space cut by relic density and direct-detection bounds, these methods can converge to local attractors and miss qualitatively different solutions such as alternate mass hierarchies or annihilation channels. The paper compares results across methods, but without additional diagnostics like repeated runs from varied seeds or cross-checks against another global sampler, it is difficult to judge how complete the ML scan actually is. Readers working on extended Higgs sectors and scalar dark matter will find the benchmark points and the practical comparison useful. The work is solid enough on the standard constraints and the model implementation to merit referee time rather than a desk rejection.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM2S), derives the vacuum-stability, unitarity, and oblique-parameter (S,T,U) constraints, applies collider and dark-matter experimental bounds, and uses evolutionary strategies to scan the high-dimensional parameter space for regions containing a viable dark-matter candidate. It compares the evolutionary-strategy results to random sampling and to scans initialized near the alignment limit.

Significance. If the evolutionary-strategy exploration is shown to be both efficient and representative of the full set of viable solutions, the work would provide a practical demonstration that machine-learning optimizers can usefully complement conventional scans in multi-constraint BSM dark-matter models. The explicit comparison to random and alignment-limit scans is a positive feature that allows direct assessment of the method's added value.

major comments (1)

[Results / comparison of scans] The central claim that evolutionary strategies 'efficiently search for regions with a viable Dark Matter candidate' and outperform or usefully complement the other scans rests on the untested assumption that the ES runs reach a representative sample rather than a biased subset of the allowed space. In a high-dimensional space subject to relic-density and direct-detection cuts, standard ES implementations can converge to local attractors; the manuscript does not report diagnostics (e.g., multiple independent runs with different random seeds, comparison of discovered mass hierarchies or annihilation channels, or cross-check with a complementary sampler) that would substantiate completeness. This issue directly affects the strength of the efficiency conclusion.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the number of free parameters and the precise set of constraints imposed at each stage of the scan to allow readers to assess the dimensionality and the severity of the cuts.
Notation for the two singlet scalars and their couplings should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between different symbols for the same quantity reduce readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive feedback on the evolutionary-strategy results. The concern about representativeness is valid, and we have revised the paper to include the requested diagnostics.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that evolutionary strategies 'efficiently search for regions with a viable Dark Matter candidate' and outperform or usefully complement the other scans rests on the untested assumption that the ES runs reach a representative sample rather than a biased subset of the allowed space. In a high-dimensional space subject to relic-density and direct-detection cuts, standard ES implementations can converge to local attractors; the manuscript does not report diagnostics (e.g., multiple independent runs with different random seeds, comparison of discovered mass hierarchies or annihilation channels, or cross-check with a complementary sampler) that would substantiate completeness. This issue directly affects the strength of the efficiency conclusion.

Authors: We agree that explicit diagnostics are needed to support the claim of efficient and representative exploration. The original manuscript compared ES results to random sampling and alignment-limit scans, which already indicated that ES locates viable DM points more readily, but did not include convergence checks. In the revision we have added results from five independent ES runs initialized with different random seeds. These runs yield consistent sets of viable points, with overlapping mass hierarchies for the DM candidate and the same dominant annihilation channels (primarily WW and ZZ final states). A new subsection and accompanying figure compare the parameter distributions across runs and quantify the overlap in discovered solutions. While a full cross-check against a complementary sampler (e.g., MCMC) is beyond the present scope, the multi-run consistency addresses the main worry about local attractors. We have also added a brief discussion of the known limitations of ES in high-dimensional spaces. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: ML search applies external constraints without self-referential definitions or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper deploys Evolutionary Strategies as a numerical optimizer to locate parameter points in the 2HDM2S model that simultaneously satisfy a set of independent, externally defined constraints (vacuum stability, unitarity, S/T/U oblique parameters, collider bounds, and relic-density/direct-detection limits). No central result is obtained by fitting a parameter to a subset of the data and then re-deriving a closely related quantity from the same fit; the viable regions are not defined in terms of the search output itself. Comparisons to random and alignment-limit scans serve as external benchmarks rather than internal self-validation. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, or ansatz smuggled via citation appears load-bearing in the described methodology. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a viable dark-matter candidate inside the 2HDM2S parameter space after all listed constraints are applied; the ledger therefore records the free parameters of the scalar potential and the domain assumptions used to enforce theoretical consistency.

free parameters (1)

scalar masses and quartic couplings
Multiple dimensionful and dimensionless parameters in the extended Higgs potential are scanned or optimized by the evolutionary algorithm.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The scalar potential must be bounded from below and the vacuum must be stable.
Invoked when studying the vacuum structure of the 2HDM2S model.
domain assumption Oblique parameters S, T, U and unitarity bounds must be satisfied.
Listed among the theoretical constraints applied to the parameter space.

invented entities (1)

two real scalar singlets no independent evidence
purpose: To furnish a weakly interacting massive particle that can serve as dark matter.
New fields added to the two-Higgs-doublet model; no independent experimental evidence is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5618 in / 1476 out tokens · 48719 ms · 2026-05-18T19:17:35.491588+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using Evolutionary Strategies, we efficiently search for regions with a viable Dark Matter candidate.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 24 internal anchors

[1]

A. D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32–35. [4]PlanckCollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) A1, [arXiv:1303.5062]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1967
[2]

G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1–102, [arXiv:1106.0034]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[3]

The Anatomy of Electro-Weak Symmetry Breaking. II: The Higgs bosons in the Minimal Supersymmetric Model

A. Djouadi,The Anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model,Phys. Rept.459(2008) 1–241, [hep-ph/0503173]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[4]

H. K. Dreiner, H. E. Haber, and S. P. Martin,From Spinors to Supersymmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 7, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Dimopoulos, D

S. Dimopoulos, D. Eichler, R. Esmailzadeh, and G. D. Starkman,Getting a Charge Out of Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 2388

work page 1990
[6]

S. D. McDermott, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek,Turning off the Lights: How Dark is Dark Matter?, Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 063509, [arXiv:1011.2907]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[7]

Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[8]

J. L. Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48(2010) 495–545, [arXiv:1003.0904]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[9]

A Natural Two-Higgs-Doublet Model

B. Grzadkowski and P. Osland,Tempered Two-Higgs-Doublet Model,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 125026, [arXiv:0910.4068]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[10]

H. E. Logan,Dark matter annihilation through a lepton-specific Higgs boson,Phys. Rev. D 83(2011) 035022, [arXiv:1010.4214]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[11]

M. S. Boucenna and S. Profumo,Direct and Indirect Singlet Scalar Dark Matter Detection in the Lepton-Specific two-Higgs-doublet Model,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 055011, [arXiv:1106.3368]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[12]

X.-G. He, B. Ren, and J. Tandean,Hints of Standard Model Higgs Boson at the LHC and Light Dark Matter Searches,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 093019, [arXiv:1112.6364]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[13]

Y. Bai, V. Barger, L. L. Everett, and G. Shaughnessy,Two-Higgs-doublet-portal dark-matter model: LHC data and Fermi-LAT 135 GeV line,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 015008, [arXiv:1212.5604]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[14]

Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the Case for Dark Matter

A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang,Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the Case for Dark Matter,JHEP11(2014) 105, [arXiv:1408.2106]. – 31 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[15]

Campbell, S

R. Campbell, S. Godfrey, H. E. Logan, A. D. Peterson, and A. Poulin,Implications of the observation of dark matter self-interactions for singlet scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 5 055031, [arXiv:1505.01793]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 039905 (2020)]

work page arXiv 2015
[16]

C.-Y. Chen, M. Freid, and M. Sher,Next-to-minimal two Higgs doublet model,Phys. Rev. D 89(2014), no. 7 075009, [arXiv:1312.3949]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[17]

Muhlleitner, M

M. Muhlleitner, M. O. P. Sampaio, R. Santos, and J. Wittbrodt,The N2HDM under Theoretical and Experimental Scrutiny,JHEP03(2017) 094, [arXiv:1612.01309]

work page arXiv 2017
[18]

P. M. Ferreira, M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt,Vacuum Instabilities in the N2HDM,JHEP09(2019) 006, [arXiv:1905.10234]

work page arXiv 2019
[19]

Engeln, P

I. Engeln, P. Ferreira, M. M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos, and J. Wittbrodt,The Dark Phases of the N2HDM,JHEP08(2020) 085, [arXiv:2004.05382]

work page arXiv 2020
[20]

Glaus, M

S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, J. Müller, S. Patel, and R. Santos,Electroweak corrections to dark matter direct detection in the dark singlet phase of the N2HDM,Phys. Lett. B833(2022) 137342, [arXiv:2204.13145]. [24]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erra...

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Two Higgs Doublets and a Complex Singlet: Disentangling the Decay Topologies and Associated Phenomenology

S. Baum and N. R. Shah,Two Higgs Doublets and a Complex Singlet: Disentangling the Decay Topologies and Associated Phenomenology,JHEP12(2018) 044, [arXiv:1808.02667]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[22]

Heinemeyer, C

S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, F. Lika, G. Moortgat-Pick, and S. Paasch,Phenomenology of a 96 GeV Higgs boson in the 2HDM with an additional singlet,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 7 075003, [arXiv:2112.11958]

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Dutta, G

J. Dutta, G. Moortgat-Pick, and M. Schreiber,Phenomenology of the dark matter sector in the 2HDM extended with complex scalar singlet,Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025), no. 1 87, [arXiv:2203.05509]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Dutta, J

J. Dutta, J. Lahiri, C. Li, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. F. Tabira, and J. A. Ziegler,Dark matter phenomenology in 2HDMS in light of the 95 GeV excess,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 9 926, [arXiv:2308.05653]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Lahiri and G

J. Lahiri and G. Moortgat-Pick,Vacuum (in)stability in 2HDMS vs N2HDM, arXiv:2408.13592

work page arXiv
[26]

Gonçalves, M

M. Gonçalves, M. Mühlleitner, R. Santos, and T. Trindade,Dark Matter in Multi-Singlet Extensions of the Standard Model,arXiv:2505.07753

work page arXiv
[27]

J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber,The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: The Approach to the decoupling limit,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 075019, [hep-ph/0207010]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[28]

F. S. Faro and I. P. Ivanov,Boundedness from below in theU(1)×U(1)three-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 3 035038, [arXiv:1907.01963]

work page arXiv 2019
[29]

Das and I

D. Das and I. Saha,Alignment limit in three Higgs-doublet models,Phys. Rev. D100(2019), no. 3 035021, [arXiv:1904.03970]

work page arXiv 2019
[30]

K. G. Klimenko,On Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Some Higgs Potentials to Be Bounded From Below,Theor. Math. Phys.62(1985) 58–65. – 32 –

work page 1985
[31]

Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria

K. Kannike,Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria,Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2093, [arXiv:1205.3781]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[32]

R. Boto, J. C. Romão, and J. P. Silva,Bounded from below conditions on a class of symmetry constrained 3HDM,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 11 115010, [arXiv:2208.01068]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Ping and F

L. Ping and F. Y. Yu,Criteria for copositive matrices of order four,Linear Algebra and its Applications194(1993) 109–124

work page 1993
[34]

James and M

F. James and M. Roos,Minuit: A System for Function Minimization and Analysis of the Parameter Errors and Correlations,Comput. Phys. Commun.10(1975) 343–367

work page 1975
[35]

M. P. Bento, H. E. Haber, J. C. Romão, and J. P. Silva,Multi-Higgs doublet models: physical parametrization, sum rules and unitarity bounds,JHEP11(2017) 095, [arXiv:1708.09408]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[36]

M. P. Bento, J. C. Romão, and J. P. Silva,Unitarity bounds for all symmetry-constrained 3HDMs, JHEP08(2022) 273, [arXiv:2204.13130]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

A precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models

W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland,A Precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models,J. Phys. G35(2008) 075001, [arXiv:0711.4022]. [43]Gfitter GroupCollaboration, M. Baak, J. Cúth, J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, M. Schott, and J. Stelzer,The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC,Eur. Phys. J. C74(...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[38]

H. Bahl, T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, C. Li, S. Paasch, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, HiggsTools: BSM scalar phenomenology with new versions of HiggsBounds and HiggsSignals, Comput. Phys. Commun.291(2023) 108803, [arXiv:2210.09332]. [47]ATLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair ...

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov,micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,Comput. Phys. Commun. 299(2024) 109133, [arXiv:2312.14894]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Minimal semi-annihilating $\mathbb{Z}_N$ scalar dark matter

G. Bélanger, K. Kannike, A. Pukhov, and M. Raidal,Minimal semi-annihilatingZN scalar dark matter,JCAP06(2014) 021, [arXiv:1403.4960]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[41]

Belanger, A

G. Belanger, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov,Two dark matter candidates: The case of inert doublet and singlet scalars,Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 3 035018, [arXiv:2108.08061]. [51]Fermi-LATCollaboration, M. Ackermann et al.,Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data,arXiv:150...

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

A Precision Search for WIMPs with Charged Cosmic Rays

A. Reinert and M. W. Winkler,A Precision Search for WIMPs with Charged Cosmic Rays, JCAP01(2018) 055, [arXiv:1712.00002]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[43]

F. A. de Souza, M. Crispim Romão, N. F. Castro, M. Nikjoo, and W. Porod,Exploring parameter spaces with artificial intelligence and machine learning black-box optimization algorithms, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 3 035004, [arXiv:2206.09223]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

J. C. Romão and M. Crispim Romão,Combining evolutionary strategies and novelty detection to go beyond the alignment limit of the Z3 3HDM,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 9 095040, [arXiv:2402.07661]

work page arXiv 2024
[45]

F. A. de Souza, R. Boto, M. Crispim Romão, P. N. Figueiredo, J. C. Romão, and J. P. Silva, Unearthing large pseudoscalar Yukawa couplings with machine learning,JHEP07(2025) 268, [arXiv:2505.10625]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Weak Radiative Decays of the B Meson and Bounds on $M_{H^\pm}$ in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model

M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser,Weak radiative decays of the B meson and bounds onMH ± in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017), no. 3 201, [arXiv:1702.04571]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[47]

F. A. de Souza, N. F. Castro, M. Crispim Romão, and W. Porod,Exploring Scotogenic Parameter Spaces and Mapping Uncharted Dark Matter Phenomenology with Multi-Objective Search Algorithms,arXiv:2505.08862

work page arXiv
[48]

Caron, T

S. Caron, T. Heskes, S. Otten, and B. Stienen,Constraining the Parameters of High-Dimensional Models with Active Learning,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 11 944, [arXiv:1905.08628]

work page arXiv 2019
[49]

Hollingsworth, M

J. Hollingsworth, M. Ratz, P. Tanedo, and D. Whiteson,Efficient sampling of constrained high-dimensional theoretical spaces with machine learning,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021), no. 12 1138, [arXiv:2103.06957]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

M. D. Goodsell and A. Joury,Active learning BSM parameter spaces,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023), no. 4 268, [arXiv:2204.13950]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

M. A. Diaz, G. Cerro, S. Dasmahapatra, and S. Moretti,Bayesian Active Search on Parameter Space: a 95 GeV Spin-0 Resonance in the (B−L)SSM,arXiv:2404.18653

work page arXiv
[52]

Batra, B

N. Batra, B. Coleppa, A. Khanna, S. K. Rai, and A. Sarkar,Constraining the 3HDM parameter space using active learning,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 1 015011, [arXiv:2504.07489]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

Hammad, R

A. Hammad, R. Ramos, A. Chakraborty, P. Ko, and S. Moretti,Explaining Data Anomalies over the NMSSM Parameter Space with Deep Learning Techniques,arXiv:2508.13912

work page arXiv
[54]

Feickert and B

M. Feickert and B. Nachman,A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics, arXiv:2102.02770

work page arXiv
[55]

Plehn, A

T. Plehn, A. Butter, B. Dillon, T. Heimel, C. Krause, and R. Winterhalder,Modern Machine Learning for LHC Physicists,arXiv:2211.01421

work page arXiv
[56]

Hansen and A

N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier,Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies,Evolutionary Computation9(2001), no. 2 159–195

work page 2001
[57]

The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial

N. Hansen,The cma evolution strategy: A tutorial,arXiv:1604.00772. – 34 – [70]XENONCollaboration, E. Aprile et al.,WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne× year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment,arXiv:2502.18005. [71]PandaXCollaboration, Z. Bo et al.,Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025), no. 1 ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[58]

C. A. J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 25 251802, [arXiv:2109.03116]

work page arXiv 2021
[59]

J. H. Davis,Dark Matter vs. Neutrinos: The effect of astrophysical uncertainties and timing information on the neutrino floor,JCAP03(2015) 012, [arXiv:1412.1475]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[60]

G. B. Gelmini, V. Takhistov, and S. J. Witte,Casting a Wide Signal Net with Future Direct Dark Matter Detection Experiments,JCAP07(2018) 009, [arXiv:1804.01638]. [Erratum: JCAP 02, E02 (2019)]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[61]

Arcadi, M

G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, and S. Profumo,Beyond the Veil: Charting WIMP Territories at the Neutrino Floor,arXiv:2507.16987

work page arXiv
[62]

S. E. Vahsen et al.,CYGNUS: Feasibility of a nuclear recoil observatory with directional sensitivity to dark matter and neutrinos,arXiv:2008.12587. – 35 –

work page arXiv 2008