Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Forward and Backward Electron Acceleration by Radially Polarized Ultra-Intense Laser Focus Seeded By Field Ionization of High Charge States of Neon

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A tightly focused radially polarized laser pulse can accelerate field-ionized electrons backward as well as forward, because its strong axial electric field gives electrons born near the axis an initial push opposite the propagation directi

desk verdict Backward electron acceleration in a radially polarized focus is a new, plausible computational result, but the unspecified ionization model and overclaimed GeV energies need fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01741 v1 pith:SOC42UZ5 submitted 2025-09-01 physics.plasm-ph physics.atom-ph

Nour El Houda Hissi , Gregory K. Ngirmang , Joseph Smith , Enam A. Chowdhury This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 52.38.Kd52.65.Rr32.80.Fb
keywords DirectaccelerationRadialpolarizationPetawattshortpulselaserIonizationPICsimulationBackwardelectronLongitudinalelectricfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that under tight focusing (f/# = 5), a radially polarized petawatt-class laser develops a strong longitudinal electric field along the propagation axis. When neon ions near the axis are field-ionized, the sign of this axial field at the electron's birth time decides the initial push: electrons born when the field points forward are kicked backward, opposite the laser propagation, while the majority still accelerate forward. The backward population is small in number and modest in energy (up to about 5 MeV), but it does not appear with linear or circular polarization, marking it as a signature of radial polarization. Forward acceleration grows with wavelength, reaching about 0.25 GeV at 2 micrometers and 5e21 W/cm2. The paper supports the single-particle results with a 3D particle-in-cell run.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the longitudinal electric-field component Ez of the lowest-order radially polarized mode (TEM01). In the paraxial model used here, Ez is strongest within a few microns of the propagation axis and its sign oscillates with the laser phase; the radial component Er dominates the energy gain, while Ez determines whether a newborn electron's initial axial force points forward or backward. The paper reduces the dynamics to the x-z plane (Eqs. 15-17) and shows the initial sign of p_z momentum follows the sign of Ez at birth, making Ez the switch that selects acceleration direction.

What would settle it

Record the electron angular distribution from a ~5e19 W/cm2, f/# = 5, radially polarized pulse focused in underdense neon; if no electrons with vz < 0 and energy near 0.6 MeV are detected while the forward beam is present, the backward-acceleration claim is wrong. In simulation, a single electron placed at rest on axis (or r ≈ 1 um) with Ez pointing forward at t0 either moves backward or it does not; the sign of the initial axial force is the deciding test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim: in a tightly focused (f/# = 5) radially polarized petawatt-class pulse, field-ionized electrons from Ne7+ can be accelerated backward, opposite the laser propagation, because the focus's longitudinal electric field Ez acts as a direction switch. Electrons born near the axis when Ez points toward the propagation receive a backward push and escape with up to ~5 MeV; the majority, born elsewhere, accelerate forward and gain up to ~0.25 GeV at 2 um and 5e21 W/cm2. The paper establishes this with single-particle Monte Carlo dynamics from 10^5 ions, verifies the Ez-dependence by artificially scaling field components (backward electrons vanish when Ez→0), and reproduces the backw

Load-bearing premise

The result stands or falls on the ionization birth times: backward acceleration occurs only for electrons created when the axial field Ez at their position points in the forward propagation direction, so if the implemented tunneling-ionization model shifts those birth phases, the backward population could shrink or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Backward-directed electrons with ~1–5 MeV appear only with radial polarization; in an experiment they could serve as a polarization-state signature that a tight radial focus was achieved.
  • Forward electron energy roughly doubles to triples when the driver wavelength goes from 0.8 um to 2 um at fixed intensity, so moving to 2 um high-repetition-rate laser platforms should improve direct-laser-acceleration output.
  • The phase-radius maps give an experimental recipe: shooting a small-radius (≈1 um) target around the axis enhances the backward fraction; a larger target (≈4 um) suppresses it.
  • Scaling the same mechanism to 5e22 W/cm2 at 2 um predicts near-GeV forward energies, linking the scheme to future higher-intensity laser systems.
  • The PIC confirmation indicates the backward population is not a single-particle-code artifact and survives in a low-density plasma environment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract's 'GeV energies are reached' statement exceeds the plotted data, which stop at 0.25 GeV; the GeV figure is a prediction for 5e22 W/cm2, so the scaling claim rather than the data supports it.
  • Because the backward population depends on the birth phase, changing the gas species (or the prepulse intensity, which shifts the ionization time via the tunneling rate) should measurably alter the backward fraction; comparing neon with a lower-ionization-potential gas would test the phase-dependence directly.
  • The paper states that non-paraxial corrections at f/# = 5 are negligible but does not display that comparison; publishing it would strengthen confidence that the sign of Ez at birth is not an artifact of the paraxial approximation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a computational study of direct electron acceleration during ionization of Ne7+ by a tightly focused, radially polarized ultra-intense laser pulse. A single-particle Lorentz-equation model with Monte Carlo sampling of the focal volume is used to show that most electrons are accelerated forward, but a subpopulation born near the propagation axis at certain laser phases is accelerated backward. The backward drift is attributed to the longitudinal electric field Ez that is characteristic of tightly focused radially polarized beams. A parametric study over wavelengths (0.8–2 μm) and intensities (5×10^19–5×10^21 W/cm^2) shows increasing forward electron energy with wavelength, reaching about 0.25 GeV at 2 μm and 5×10^21 W/cm^2. The manuscript also includes a 3D EPOCH PIC simulation using superimposed Hermite–Gaussian modes to represent radial polarization, reporting backward-propagating electrons for Ne8+ and none for linear polarization. The authors conclude that backward acceleration is a unique signature of radial polarization and that GeV energies are projected at 2 μm and 5×10^22 W/cm^2.

Significance. If correct, the prediction of a backward-directed electron population from a radially polarized laser focus is novel and potentially testable with current petawatt-class facilities. The paper's strengths are its use of a single-particle model with relativistic Lorentz dynamics, an explicit sensitivity test in which Ez is artificially reduced (Fig. 9), a direct comparison between radial and linear polarization in PIC, and a parametric scan over wavelength and intensity. The central claim is physically plausible: electrons born when Ez points opposite to the propagation direction receive an initial backward push. However, the manuscript currently lacks a reproducible specification of the ionization phase distribution on which the backward population critically depends, and it overstates the demonstrated energy reach. These issues are fixable but require substantive additions before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1.1 (Ionization)] The central mechanism of the paper—backward acceleration set by the sign of Ez at birth time t0—makes the distribution of t0 load-bearing. The manuscript states only that t0 'strongly depends on laser intensity, the atomic number of the considered gas and its ionization potential' and cites Ref. [7] for the 'semiclassical model'; Ref. [7], however, is an optically guided laser-wakefield acceleration paper, not an ionization model. Neither the implemented tunneling rate (e.g., ADK/PPT or a specific Coulomb-corrected rate) nor the Monte Carlo assignment of t0 is given. Figures 13–14 and the scenario in §2.2.4 are therefore not reproducible, and the existence and size of the backward population could be an artifact of an unphysical phase sampling. Please provide the exact rate formula, sampling procedure, and a sensitivity scan over phase distributions (e.g., uniform versus rate-weighted) t
  2. [Abstract and §2.3 (Conclusion)] The abstract claims 'GeV energies are reached' for inner-shell electrons, but the highest energy shown anywhere is about 0.25 GeV at λ=2 μm and I=5×10^21 W/cm^2 (Fig. 5). The only GeV statement in the body is a projection—'Near GeV energies were predicted at λ=2 microns ... I=5×10^22 W/cm^2'—and no simulation at 5×10^22 W/cm^2 is presented. Either provide results at that intensity with the same model or soften the abstract and conclusion to 'projected'/'expected'. As written, the abstract overstates the demonstrated result and will mislead readers.
  3. [§2.2.3 (PIC Simulation)] The PIC run is presented as confirmation of the single-particle result, but it uses a different charge state and target geometry: Ne8+ (Figs. 11–12) rather than Ne7+, and a 0.5-μm-thick, 5-μm-radius target rather than a uniform focal-volume distribution over a Rayleigh range. It therefore does not validate the Ne7+ phase–radius statistics (Figs. 13–14) or the initial-condition range claimed in §2.2.1. Please either match the setup more closely, or explicitly state that the PIC check is a qualitative existence proof and explain why the differences in charge state and target geometry do not affect the conclusion.
  4. [§2.1.1 (field model and non-paraxial check)] The paper says non-paraxial corrections 'were calculated and compared to the results obtained using paraxial fields, and were found to be negligible' for f/#=5, but no such comparison is shown. Since the backward mechanism depends on the small-radius longitudinal field Ez and f/#=5 is near the limit of paraxial validity, the reader needs at least one quantitative comparison (e.g., maximum relative difference in Ez or in final electron energy) to assess this premise. Without it, the field-model sensitivity is unsupported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] Typographical issues: 'Pettawatt' should be 'petawatt'; 'Raleigh range' should be 'Rayleigh range'; several occurrences of 'e ffect' (e.g., in §2.2.2 and figure captions); 'Ne8 +' has a spacing error in §2.2.3 captions.
  2. [§2.1.2 (Acceleration)] Equation numbering is inconsistent: after presenting Eqs. (12)–(14), the text states 'Equations (6)–(8) are coupled ordinary differential equations'; the intended equations appear to be (12)–(14). Also, Eq. (5) for χ is written as χ = e/m^2 E0, which is dimensionally inconsistent with Eq. (4); please check the definition and notation.
  3. [§2.1.1, Eq. (2)] The typeset Eq. (2) contains a garbled term: '− zr 2 / zrr2 0 f 2 cos(ϕ)' does not parse correctly. Please verify the Gouy-phase and curvature terms against the original paraxial field model in Ref. [23].
  4. [Figures 6, 13, 14] The histograms in Figs. 13–14 and the polar plots in Fig. 6 lack clear axis labels and color bars. The definition of 'initial phase' (φ0 in Eq. (2)?) should be given explicitly, and the color scale for electron energy should be shown in every panel.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; forward model with no fitted inputs, and the backward-acceleration result is a computed output supported by controlled sensitivity tests.

full rationale

The paper is a forward computational study. It solves the relativistic Lorentz equation (Eqs. 7 and 12–14) for electrons produced by Monte-Carlo ionization sampling in prescribed radially polarized fields (Eqs. 1–2, taken from refs. [14,23]) and compares the result with linear polarization. No parameter is fitted to any dataset, and no reported quantity is a refit of an input. The central backward-acceleration claim is a simulation output, not an input: the authors show in Sec. 2.2.4 that the backward population is associated with the sign of Ez at the electron's birth, and they provide a controlled sensitivity check in Fig. 9 where artificially reducing Ez removes the backward electrons while reducing Er suppresses forward energy gain. This is a legitimate mechanism test, not circular reasoning. The result does depend on the adopted field model and on the unspecified ionization birth-time (t0) sampling; if those are unphysical, the result could be incorrect, but that is a correctness risk, not an equivalence-to-input. The paper cites prior work by overlapping authors ([34], [41], [47]), but these are background/supporting citations and are not used as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the simulation; they therefore do not make the derivation circular. Missing details (the implemented tunneling rate, and the claimed but unshown non-paraxial correction comparison) are acknowledged in the text only by assertion; they affect verifiability, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of modeling choices: a specific paraxial field representation, a semi-classical ionization model that is not specified, and the neglect of plasma feedback. No parameters are fitted to external data; the simulation is a forward model. The backward-electron result is qualitatively robust to the field sensitivity test (reducing Ez removes backward electrons), but quantitative fractions and energies would depend on the unspecified ionization sampling.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Relativistic Lorentz force equation (with Landau-Lifshitz radiation reaction shown negligible)
    Used to evolve electron momenta, eq. (7); well-established equation, no independent derivation needed.
  • domain assumption Paraxial field model of a radially polarized focused beam from Varin et al. [23] is accurate at f/# = 5
    Used for all field components (eqs. 1-2); paper states non-paraxial corrections were checked and found negligible but does not show the comparison (Section 2.1.1).
  • domain assumption Semi-classical tunneling ionization model determines electron birth time and phase
    Invoked in Section 2.1.1 but the specific rate formula is not given; [7] is mis-cited, so the model is not reproducible from the paper.
  • domain assumption Electrons are born at rest with zero initial momentum
    Stated in Section 2.1.1; standard for ionization injection at these intensities but affects initial phase dynamics.
  • domain assumption Plasma effects are negligible; gas is sufficiently underdense
    Stated in Section 2.1.1 to justify single-particle model; the PIC run later uses 1e27 m^-3, near critical density, creating an inconsistency (Section 2.2.3).
  • domain assumption Radiation reaction and quantum effects are negligible
    Justified in Section 2.1.2 via chi about 1.5e-4 and Rc about 1.5e-4 at 5e21 W/cm2; reasonable, but only checked for the stated parameters.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo sampling of 1e5 ions uniformly distributed in a cylinder of radius equal to lambda and length 2 z_r is representative
    Described in Section 2.1.1; no convergence or statistical error analysis is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Forward and Backward Electron Acceleration by Radially Polarized Ultra-Intense Laser Focus Seeded By Field Ionization of High Charge States of Neon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SOC42UZ5

@misc{pith2026250901741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Forward and Backward Electron Acceleration by Radially Polarized Ultra-Intense Laser Focus Seeded By Field Ionization of High Charge States of Neon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SOC42UZ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01741}
}
read the original abstract

Thanks to the fabrication of large aperture phase optics, ultra-intense relativistic laser plasma interaction (RLPI) experiments with complex polarization states are becoming feasible. In this work, we perform a computational investigation of direct acceleration of electrons produced during ionization of underdense neon gas using a tightly focused and radially polarized Petawatt-class short pulse lasers by numerically solving the relativistically invariant Lorentz equations, incorporating semi-classical tunneling ionization and Monte Carlo type sampling of the focal volume. The accelerated electrons energy gain increases at longer laser wavelengths and GeV energies are reached for electrons ionized from the neon inner shells, which are field ionized near the peak of the pulse. Backward acceleration of electrons is observed for a range of initial positions and phases of ionization of neon charge states. This apparent counterintuitive phenomenon is directly linked to the radial polarization state of the incident laser beam that results in a strong longitudinal electric field Ez when tightly focused, where electrons ionized near the focal center at the phase when Ez is pointed toward the forward propagation direction experiences an initial push in the backward direction. A parametric study of the phenomenon by varying laser parameters is presented, and a 3D particle in cell (PIC) simulation is considered to confirm the existence of this phenomenon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of electron acceleration from ionization in a Gaussian laser pulse, (b) Representation of spherical polar coordinates used to localise an accelerated electron. that peak fields and corresponding intensities are lower for a radially polarized pulse in the same equivalent f /# system. Another important point to note is that the field and electron dynamical corrections due to non-paraxial fields for all c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of normalized squared electric fields in x-y plane obtained for an f/# = 5 at an intensity I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . E0=1.94.1013 V/m is the incident electric field strength. (a) Normalized squared |Ex|, (b) Normalized squared |Ey|, (c) Normalized squared |Ez|, (d) Normalized overall distribution of the electric field E = p |Ex| 2 + |Ey| 2 + |Ez| 2, (e) 3D plot of the normalized overall distribution of the e… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of normalized squared electric fields in x-z plane obtained for an f/# = 5 at an intensity I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . (a) Normalized squared |Ex|, (b) Normalized squared |Ez|, (c) Normalized overall distribution of the electric field E = p |Ex| 2 + |Ey| 2 + |Ez| 2, (d) 3D plot of the normalized overall distribution of the electric field. dpz dt = −e(Ez + pxBy − pyBx m0γ ) (14) The Lorentz Factor is defined as… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) 3D trajectories of electrons accelerated by a tightly focused and radially polarized laser pulse with an f/# = 5 and an intensity equal to I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . (b) Projection of the 3D trajectories in x-z plane, (c) 3D trajectories of electrons accelerated by a tig…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Polar plot of the final kinetic energy in MeV of accelerated electrons in x-y plane for different wavelengths and at different intensities. (a) I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 , (b) I = 5 · 1020 W/cm2 , (c) I = 5 · 1021 W/cm2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The initial phase and initial radius versus the final energy of accelerated electrons at an f/# = 5 and for different intensities, for λ = 0.8µm (yellow polar plot in the previous figure). 2.2.2. Radially polarized Electric field effect on the backward acceleration: Af…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Final position of accelerated electrons in backward and forward directions at different intensities and different target radii. (a) Backward accelerated electrons from a cylindrical target with radius R = 1 µm, (b) Forward accelerated electrons from a cylindrical targe…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the normalized squared electric field of the focal spot (f /# = 5 and I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 ) superimposed with the number of accelerated electrons versus the target radius (in blue). Nf is the number of electrons accelerated in the forward direction (Soli…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The number of accelerated electrons in backward (Nb) and forward (Nf) directions versus the artificially decreased longitudinal electric fieldEz in a radially polarized laser pulse under an f/# = 5 and an intensity of I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . Here Nb is scaled by a factor …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Projection of 3D PIC simulation: Orthogonal Hermite gaussian modes used to form the radial component of the electric field in radial polarization. (a) representing the y component of the electric field squared , (b) TE 10 representing the z component of the electric f…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 3D PIC simulation electron density snapshot at 100 fs: (a) Electrons density from ionization of Ne8+ with radially polarized laser, (b) Electrons kinetic energy from ionization of Ne8+ with linearly polarized laser. forward direction slightly decreases but still exist…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fig.10. The density of the ionized Neon target is as low [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: 3D PIC simulation snapshot at 100 fs: (a) Electrons kinetic energy from ionization of Ne8+ with radially polarized laser, (b) Electrons kinetic energy from ionization of Ne8+ with linearly polarized laser. Here in the color map the highest energy (yellow) and the lowe…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Projection of 3D histogram of the initial phases versus the initial radiuses of the accelerated electrons in the forward direction under an f/# = 5 and at different intensities. (a) I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 , (b) I = 5 · 1020 W/cm2 , (c) I = 5 · 1021 W/cm2 .(Unit of y axis …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Projection of 3D histogram of the initial phases versus the initial radii of the accelerated electrons in the backward direction under an f-number of 5 and at different intensities.(a) I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 , (b) I = 5 · 1020 W/cm2 , (c) I = 5 · 1021 W/cm2 . (Unit of y a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Normalized momentums Px and Pz of an electron accelerated in the forward direction under an f-number of 5 and an intensity of I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . (b) left: Lorentz force (SI units) components Fx and Fz of the same electron accelerated in the forward direction und…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) Normalized momentums Px and Pz of an electron accelerated in the backward direction under an f-number of 5 and an intensity of I = 5 · 1019 W/cm2 . (b) left: Lorentz force (SI units) components Fx and Fz of the same electron accelerated in the forward direction un…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Optically Guided Laser Wake- Field Acceleration*

    Esarey, E., et al. “Optically Guided Laser Wake- Field Acceleration*.” Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, vol. 5, no. 7, July 1993, pp. 2690–2697, 10.1063/1.860707

    work page doi:10.1063/1.860707 1993

  2. [1]

    Petawatt Class Lasers World- wide

    Danson, Colin, et al. “Petawatt Class Lasers World- wide.” High Power Laser Science and Engineering, vol. 3, 2015, 10.1017/hpl.2014.52

    work page doi:10.1017/hpl.2014.52 2015

  3. [2]

    Petawatt and Exawatt Class Lasers Worldwide

    Danson, Colin N., et al. “Petawatt and Exawatt Class Lasers Worldwide.” High Power Laser Science and Engineering, vol. 7, 2019, 10.1017/hpl.2019.36

    doi:10.1017/hpl.2019.36 2019

  4. [3]

    Relativistic High-Power Laser–Matter Interactions

    Salamin, Y , et al. “Relativistic High-Power Laser–Matter Interactions.” Physics Reports, vol. 427, no. 2-3, Apr. 2006, pp. 41–155, 10.1016/j.physrep.2006.01.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.01.002 2006

  5. [4]

    Electron Beam Quality in a Cyclotron Autoresonance Accelerator

    Hafizi, B., et al. “Electron Beam Quality in a Cyclotron Autoresonance Accelerator.” Physical Review E, vol. 50, no. 4, 1 Oct. 1994, pp. 3077–3086, 10.1103 /phys- reve.50.3077

    work page 1994

  6. [5]

    Observation of Energy Gain at the BNL Inverse Free-Electron-Laser Accelerator

    van Steenbergen, A., et al. “Observation of Energy Gain at the BNL Inverse Free-Electron-Laser Accelerator.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 13, 23 Sept. 1996, pp. 2690–2693, 10.1103/physrevlett.77.2690

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2690 1996

  7. [6]

    Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons Using the Inverse Cherenkov Effect

    Kimura, W. D., et al. “Laser Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons Using the Inverse Cherenkov Effect.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, no. 4, 23 Jan. 1995, pp. 546–549, 10.1103/physrevlett.74.546

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.546 1995

  8. [8]

    Laser Electron Accelerator

    Tajima, T., and J. M. Dawson. “Laser Electron Accelerator.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 43, no. 4, 23 July 1979, pp. 267–270, 10.1103/physrevlett.43.267

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 1979

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Analysis of Electron Acceleration in a Vacuum Beat Wave

    Salamin, Yousef I, and Christoph H Keitel. “Analysis of Electron Acceleration in a Vacuum Beat Wave.” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 33, no. 22, 8 Nov. 2000, pp. 5057–5076, 10.1088/0953-4075/33/22/308

    doi

  2. [10]

    Laser Driven Electron Acceleration in Vacuum, Gases, and Plasmas

    Sprangle, Phillip, et al. “Laser Driven Electron Acceleration in Vacuum, Gases, and Plasmas.” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 3, no. 5, May 1996, pp. 2183–2190, 10.1063/1.871673

    1996 doi

  3. [11]

    High-Quality Electron Beams from a Laser Wakefield Accelerator Using Plasma- Channel Guiding

    Geddes, C. G. R., et al. “High-Quality Electron Beams from a Laser Wakefield Accelerator Using Plasma- Channel Guiding.” Nature, vol. 431, no. 7008, Sept. 2004, pp. 538–541, 10.1038/nature02900

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    Multi-MeV Electron Acceleration by Subterawatt Laser Pulses

    Goers, A.J., et al. “Multi-MeV Electron Acceleration by Subterawatt Laser Pulses.” Physical Review Letters, 14 Hissi, Ngirmang,Smith and Chowdhury vol. 115, no. 19, 5 Nov. 2015, 10.1103 /phys- revlett.115.194802

    2015

  5. [13]

    Multi-GeV Energy Gain in a Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator

    Hogan, M. J., et al. “Multi-GeV Energy Gain in a Plasma-Wakefield Accelerator.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 5, 28 July 2005, 10.1103 /phys- revlett.95.054802

    2005

  6. [14]

    Mono-Energetic GeV Electrons from Ionization in a Radially Polarized Laser Beam

    Salamin, Yousef I. “Mono-Energetic GeV Electrons from Ionization in a Radially Polarized Laser Beam.” Optics Letters, vol. 32, no. 1, 13 Dec. 2006, p. 90, 10.1364/ol.32.000090

    2006 doi

  7. [15]

    Quasi-Monoenergetic Laser-Plasma Acceleration of Electrons to 2 GeV

    Wang, Xiaoming, et al. “Quasi-Monoenergetic Laser-Plasma Acceleration of Electrons to 2 GeV .” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013, 10.1038/ncomms2988

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Physics of Laser- Driven Plasma-Based Electron Accelerators

    Esarey, E., C. B. Schroeder, et al. “Physics of Laser- Driven Plasma-Based Electron Accelerators.” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 3, 2009, pp. 1229–85, 10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    Laser Plasma Accelerators

    Malka, V . “Laser Plasma Accelerators.” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 19, no. 5, 2012, p. 055501, 10.1063/1.3695389

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Relativistic Electron Beams Driven by KHz Single-Cycle Light Pulses

    Gu ´enot, D., et al. “Relativistic Electron Beams Driven by KHz Single-Cycle Light Pulses.” Nature Photonics, vol. 11, no. 5, 2017, pp. 293–96, 10.1038/nphoton.2017.46

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Low-Di ffraction Direct Particle Acceleration by a Radially Polarized Laser Beam

    Salamin, Yousef I. “Low-Di ffraction Direct Particle Acceleration by a Radially Polarized Laser Beam.” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 48, 2010, pp. 4950–53, 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.10.011

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    Anticorrelated Emission of High Harmonics and Fast Electron Beams From Plasma Mirrors

    Bocoum, Ma ¨ımouna, et al. “Anticorrelated Emission of High Harmonics and Fast Electron Beams From Plasma Mirrors.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, no. 18, 2016, 10.1103/physrevlett.116.185001

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Laser-Induced Linear-Field Particle Acceleration in Free Space

    Wong et al. “Laser-Induced Linear-Field Particle Acceleration in Free Space.” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017, 10.1038/s41598-017-11547-9

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Generation of a Beam of Fast Electrons by Tightly Focusing a Radially Polarized Ultrashort Laser Pulse

    Payeur, S., et al. “Generation of a Beam of Fast Electrons by Tightly Focusing a Radially Polarized Ultrashort Laser Pulse.” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 4, 2012, p. 041105, 10.1063/1.4738998

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    Direct Electron Acceleration with Radially Polarized Laser Beams

    Varin, Charles, et al. “Direct Electron Acceleration with Radially Polarized Laser Beams.” Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013, pp. 70–93, 10.3390/app3010070

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    Polarization E ffect of a Chirped Gaussian Laser Pulse on the Electron Bunch Acceleration

    Sohbatzadeh, F., and H. AKU. “Polarization E ffect of a Chirped Gaussian Laser Pulse on the Electron Bunch Acceleration.” Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 77, no. 1, 2009, pp. 39–50, 10.1017/s0022377809990407

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    Terahertz-Driven Linear Electron Acceleration

    Nanni, Emilio A., et al. “Terahertz-Driven Linear Electron Acceleration.” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, 2015, 10.1038/ncomms9486

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Relativistic Acceleration of Electrons Injected by a Plasma Mirror into a Radially Polarized Laser Beam

    Za ¨ım, N., et al. “Relativistic Acceleration of Electrons Injected by a Plasma Mirror into a Radially Polarized Laser Beam.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 119, no. 9, 2017, 10.1103/physrevlett.119.094801

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Electron Acceleration by a Radially-Polarized Laser Pulse in a Plasma Micro- Channel

    Wen, Meng, et al. “Electron Acceleration by a Radially-Polarized Laser Pulse in a Plasma Micro- Channel.” Optics Express, vol. 27, no. 2, 2019, p. 557, 10.1364/oe.27.000557

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Electron Acceleration from Rest in Vacuum by an Axicon Gaussian Laser Beam

    Salamin, Yousef I. “Electron Acceleration from Rest in Vacuum by an Axicon Gaussian Laser Beam.” Physical Review A, vol. 73, no. 4, 2006, 10.1103/physreva.73.043402

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    Sharper Focus for a Radially Polarized Light Beam

    Dorn, R., et al. “Sharper Focus for a Radially Polarized Light Beam.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 23, 2003, 10.1103/physrevlett.91.233901

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    Gouy Phase Shift of a Tightly Focused, Radially Polarized Beam

    Kaltenecker, Korbinian J., et al. “Gouy Phase Shift of a Tightly Focused, Radially Polarized Beam.” Optica, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016, p. 35, 10.1364/optica.3.000035

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Electron Acceleration from Rest to GeV Energy by Chirped Axicon Gaussian Laser Pulse in Vacuum in the Presence of Wiggler Magnetic Field

    Kant, Niti, et al. “Electron Acceleration from Rest to GeV Energy by Chirped Axicon Gaussian Laser Pulse in Vacuum in the Presence of Wiggler Magnetic Field.” High Energy Density Physics, vol. 26, 2018, pp. 16–22, 10.1016/j.hedp.2017.11.003

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    The Breaking Up of Atomic Particles by an Electric Field and by Electron Collisions

    Smirnov, B. M., et al. “The Breaking Up of Atomic Particles by an Electric Field and by Electron Collisions”, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 22, 1966, p. 585

    1966

  25. [33]

    Ionization of Atoms in an Alternating Electric Field

    Perelomov, A. M., et al. “Ionization of Atoms in an Alternating Electric Field”, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 23, 1966, p. 924

    1966

  26. [34]

    ‘Nonrelativistic’ Ioniza- tion of TheL-Shell States in Argon by a ‘Relativis- tic’1019W/Cm2laser Field

    Chowdhury, Enam A., et al. “‘Nonrelativistic’ Ioniza- tion of TheL-Shell States in Argon by a ‘Relativis- tic’1019W/Cm2laser Field.” Physical Review A, vol. 63, no. 4, 2001, 10.1103/physreva.63.042712

    2001 doi

  27. [35]

    Laser Acceleration of Electrons to Giga-Electron-V olt Energies Using Highly Charged Ions

    Hu, S. X., and Anthony F. Starace. “Laser Acceleration of Electrons to Giga-Electron-V olt Energies Using Highly Charged Ions.” Physical Review E, vol. 73, no. 6, 2006, 10.1103/physreve.73.066502

    2006 doi

  28. [36]

    Electron Acceleration by a Radially Polarized Laser Pulse during Ionization of Low Density Gases

    Singh, Kunwar Pal, and Manoj Kumar. “Electron Acceleration by a Radially Polarized Laser Pulse during Ionization of Low Density Gases.” Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams, vol. 14, no. 3, 7 Mar. 2011, 10.1103/physrevstab.14.030401

    2011 doi

  29. [37]

    Demonstration of a Compact, Multi- Joule, Diode-Pumped Tm:YLF Laser

    Tamer, Issa, et al. “Demonstration of a Compact, Multi- Joule, Diode-Pumped Tm:YLF Laser.” Optics Letters, vol. 46, no. 20, 5 Oct. 2021, p. 5096, 10.1364/ol.439238

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Ultrastrong Field Ionization Of Nen+(N≤8): Rescattering and the Role of the Magnetic Field

    Palaniyappan, S., et al. “Ultrastrong Field Ionization Of Nen+(N≤8): Rescattering and the Role of the Magnetic Field.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 24, 22 June 2005, 10.1103/physrevlett.94.243003

    2005 doi

  31. [39]

    Analysis on the Longitudinal Field Strength Formed by Tightly-Focused Radially- Polarized Femtosecond Petawatt Laser Pulse

    Jeong, Tae Moon, et al. “Analysis on the Longitudinal Field Strength Formed by Tightly-Focused Radially- Polarized Femtosecond Petawatt Laser Pulse.” Optics Express, vol. 26, no. 25, 4 Dec. 2018, p. 33091, 10.1364/oe.26.033091

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    Maltsev, A., and T. Ditmire. “Above Threshold Ionization in Tightly Focused, Strongly Relativistic Direct Electron Acceleration by Radially Polarized Ultra-Intense Laser F ocus During Ionization of High Charge States of Neon 15 Laser Fields.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, ...

    2003 doi

  33. [41]

    Electron Momentum States and Bremsstrahlung Radiation from the Ul- traintense Field Ionization of Atoms

    Chowdhury, Enam A., et al. “Electron Momentum States and Bremsstrahlung Radiation from the Ul- traintense Field Ionization of Atoms.” Optics Ex- press, vol. 12, no. 17, 23 Aug. 2004, p. 3911, 10.1364/opex.12.003911

    2004 doi

  34. [42]

    Radiation Friction Force E ffects on Electron Dynamics in Ultra- Intensity Laser Pulse

    Zhang, Yanzeng, and Sergei Krasheninnikov. “Radiation Friction Force E ffects on Electron Dynamics in Ultra- Intensity Laser Pulse.” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 26, no. 1, Jan. 2019, p. 010702, 10.1063/1.5075720

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac versus Landau-Lifshitz Radiation Friction Force in the Ultrarelativistic Electron Interaction with Electromag- netic Wave (Exact Solutions)

    Bulanov, Sergei V ., et al. “Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac versus Landau-Lifshitz Radiation Friction Force in the Ultrarelativistic Electron Interaction with Electromag- netic Wave (Exact Solutions).” Physical Review E, vol. 84, no. 5, 11 Nov. 2011, 10.1103/physreve.84.056605

    2011 doi

  36. [44]

    Hatsagortsyan, C.H

    Di Piazza, K.Z. Hatsagortsyan, C.H. Keitel, Quantum radiation reaction efects in multiphoton Compton scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 220403 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Radiation Reaction in Electron–Beam Interactions with High-Intensity Lasers

    Blackburn, T. G. “Radiation Reaction in Electron–Beam Interactions with High-Intensity Lasers.” Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, 25 Mar. 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    “Comparison of EPOCH and SMILEI Particle-In-Cell codes in laser driven particle accel- eration.“ Master’s thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague, 2019

    Mouziouras, E. “Comparison of EPOCH and SMILEI Particle-In-Cell codes in laser driven particle accel- eration.“ Master’s thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    A Particle-In-Cell Code Comparison for Ion Acceleration: EPOCH, LSP, and WarpX

    Smith, Joseph R., et al. “A Particle-In-Cell Code Comparison for Ion Acceleration: EPOCH, LSP, and WarpX.” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 28, no. 7, July 2021, p. 074505, 10.1063/5.0053109

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Contemporary Particle-In-Cell Approach to Laser-Plasma Modelling

    Arber, T D, et al. “Contemporary Particle-In-Cell Approach to Laser-Plasma Modelling.” Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 57, no. 11, 10 Sept. 2015, p. 113001, 10.1088/0741-3335/57/11/113001

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    Bremsstrahlung E ffects in Energetic Particle Detectors

    Tuszewski, M., et al. “Bremsstrahlung E ffects in Energetic Particle Detectors.” Space Weather, vol. 2, no. 10, Oct. 2004, p. n/a-n/a, 10.1029/2003sw000057

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    Light with a Twist in Its Tail

    Padgett, Miles, and L. Allen. “Light with a Twist in Its Tail.” Contemporary Physics, vol. 41, no. 5, Sept. 2000, pp. 275–285, 10.1080/001075100750012777

    2000 doi

  43. [51]

    Breaking Symmetry in Propagation of Radially and Azimuthally Polarized High Power Laser Pulses in Underdense Plasma

    Pathak, Naveen, et al. “Breaking Symmetry in Propagation of Radially and Azimuthally Polarized High Power Laser Pulses in Underdense Plasma.” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 23, no. 3, Mar. 2016, p. 033102, 10.1063/1.4942942

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.