Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 166 references

Mapping Magnetic Fields from Clouds to Cores with PRIMAger

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PRIMAger, a proposed far-infrared polarimetry imager, can map magnetic fields across entire nearby molecular clouds in 170 hours of observing time.

desk verdict A clear, honest survey proposal for PRIMAger whose headline 170-hour estimate is plausible but depends on an under-specified ETC and an optimistic 20% cirrus polarization fraction; worth a serious referee, but the sensitivity claim needs hardening. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01796 v1 pith:LTUQ2T2H submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.IM

Kate Pattle , Janik Karoly , Lorna Buhil Findlay , Simon Coudé , Brandon S. Hensley , Paulo C. Cortes , James Di Francesco , Valentin J. M. Le Gouellec
show 2 more authors
Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez Fabien Louvet
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IM
keywords magneticfieldsmolecularcloudsfar-infraredpolarimetryPRIMAgerdustgrainalignmentstarformationcirrusconfusionlimitGouldBeltSurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that PRIMAger, the polarimetry imager on the proposed PRIMA far-infrared space telescope, can for the first time map magnetic fields continuously from whole molecular clouds down to the individual filaments and cores inside them. The central estimate is that mapping the 160 square degrees covered by the Herschel Gould Belt Survey down to the cirrus confusion limit (the brightness floor set by diffuse galactic dust) in polarized light would take about 170 hours, giving a 5-sigma detection of 20% polarized cirrus at polarized intensities near 1 MJy/sr in the longest-wavelength band. If that holds, PRIMAger would resolve magnetic field structure at roughly 10^3-10^4 au scales across entire clouds, a resolution improvement of over an order of magnitude over Planck and a mapping-speed gain of about 10,000 times over the SOFIA/HAWC+ polarimeter. The survey would turn magnetic field geometry in star-forming clouds into a statistical, population-wide measurement rather than a set of scattered core-scale snapshots, and would simultaneously deliver multi-wavelength polarization spectra that test dust grain alignment models. The time estimate depends on the PRIMAger exposure-time calculator and on the assumption that diffuse cirrus is 20% polarized; both are stated openly and can be checked before launch.

What carries the argument

Dust-grain alignment is the physical mechanism: interstellar dust grains align with their minor axes perpendicular to the local magnetic field, so their thermal far-infrared emission is linearly polarized perpendicular to the plane-of-sky field direction, and mapping polarized intensity maps the field. The calculation that carries the argument is the exposure-time chain: the Herschel 250 micron cirrus confusion level (5 MJy/sr) is taken as the PPI4 Stokes I floor; assuming 20% polarization sets a polarized-intensity target of 1.0 MJy/sr; and the PRIMAger exposure-time calculator converts that target into 1.1 hours per square degree, or 170 hours for the full 160 square degree Gould Belt foot

What would settle it

Two checks would settle it: (1) scale HAWC+ measured sensitivities to PRIMAger's aperture, wavelengths, and bandwidths and compare against the exposure-time calculator's prediction; (2) measure the actual polarization fraction of cirrus at the 1-5 MJy/sr brightness level using Planck 353 GHz polarization maps of low-column-density fields. If the scaled sensitivity is more than roughly twice the ETC value, or the cirrus polarization fraction comes in below about 10 percent, the 170-hour, 160-square-degree survey time is not achievable as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim, on its own terms, is that PRIMAger will map the plane-of-sky magnetic field geometry of all star-forming molecular clouds within 0.5 kpc, in four far-infrared bands (PPI1-PPI4, 96-235 micron), at linear resolutions of about 10^-3 to 10^-2 pc. Taking Herschel 250 micron data as a stand-in for PPI4, the authors estimate that 170 hours of observing time, 1.1 hours per square degree including overheads, yields a 5-sigma detection of 20% polarized cirrus at 1.0 MJy/sr in polarized intensity, with the same exposure reaching 2.52, 1.94, and 1.37 MJy/sr in the three shorter bands. Because polarization fraction in the diffuse ISM peaks near 20% and declines with extinction, a detec

Load-bearing premise

The 170-hour estimate rests entirely on the PRIMAger exposure-time calculator's claim that PPI4 reaches a 5-sigma polarized-intensity sensitivity of 1.0 MJy/sr in 1.1 hours per square degree, together with the assumption that the faintest cirrus the survey targets is genuinely 20% polarized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The entire Gould Belt sample of clouds within 0.5 kpc can be mapped in polarized light in about a week of observing time, making an unbiased statistical survey of magnetic field morphologies practical for the first time.
  • The same image connects scales: magnetic fields in diffuse cloud envelopes and in individual filaments and cores (0.006-0.06 pc resolution) are traced in one dataset, allowing the cloud-to-core field transition to be measured directly.
  • Multi-wavelength polarization spectra across entire clouds would test radiative-alignment and grain-disruption models and map how dust properties change from cirrus to dense cores.
  • A uniform, large-area sample lets field-strength estimators such as the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, histogram-of-relative-orientation analyses, and comparisons with magnetized star-formation simulations be applied statistically rather than on a handful of regions.
  • The survey's deep total-intensity maps enable auxiliary science beyond polarimetry, such as censuses of candidate pre-brown-dwarf cores and studies of extragalactic background sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same scaling extends beyond 0.5 kpc: mapping more distant, higher-mass star-forming regions would take proportionally longer but remains practical, so this survey is a template for a wider high-mass program that the paper mentions but does not cost out.
  • The 250 micron-to-PPI4 intensity transfer is a bandpass assumption, not a measured equivalence; cold versus warm cirrus will shift it. A pre-launch check comparing Herschel 250 and 350 micron maps in the same fields could bracket this conversion uncertainty.
  • If real cirrus polarization at 235 micron is below the assumed 20%, the survey time scales roughly as the inverse square of the polarization fraction, so 10% polarization would multiply the 170 hours by about four, a straightforward rescaling of the paper's own formula.
  • The paper notes synergies with radio Zeeman and Faraday-rotation instruments; if the survey flies, its wide-area plane-of-sky maps would provide the targeting and prior geometry needed to turn those line-of-sight measurements into three-dimensional field reconstructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an unbiased survey of nearby molecular clouds (within 0.5 kpc) in polarized far-infrared light with the PRIMAger Polarimetry Imager, aiming to map magnetic fields from whole-cloud scales (~10 pc) down to core scales (~10^-2 pc). The central quantitative claim is that mapping the 160 deg^2 covered by the Herschel Gould Belt Survey to the cirrus confusion limit in polarized intensity would require 170 hours of PRIMAger time, yielding 5-sigma detections of 20% polarized cirrus at 1.0-2.4 MJy/sr in PPI1-PPI4. The estimate is obtained by scaling the PRIMAger Exposure Time Calculator (ETC) to the assumed cirrus confusion level, using Herschel 250 micron data as a proxy for PPI4 (235 micron) Stokes I. The paper also presents illustrative model PRIMAger maps of Ophiuchus, compares resolution and mapping speed with Planck and HAWC+, and outlines the scientific analyses enabled by such a survey.

Significance. If the sensitivity estimate is correct, the proposed survey would be transformative: it would provide the first unbiased, high-resolution FIR polarization maps of entire molecular clouds, with >10x better angular resolution than Planck and ~10,000x higher mapping speed than HAWC+, while spanning the peak of the dust SED in four bands. The paper is clearly written, and the model magnetic-field maps in Section 5 are explicitly labeled as illustrative rather than predictions, which is appropriate. The ETC is an independent instrument model, so there is no circularity in the central estimate. However, the 170-hour headline is load-bearing and currently rests on a small number of stated assumptions (notably the 20% cirrus polarization fraction and a unit conversion) and on unstated ETC inputs. The science case is strong, but the feasibility number needs to be made reproducible and robust before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Table 1] The stated conversion '1 MJy/sr = 14.1 mJy/beam' for a PPI4 beam FWHM of 27.6'' is inconsistent with the standard Gaussian-beam solid angle: Omega = 1.133 theta^2 = 2.03e-8 sr, which gives 1 MJy/sr = 20.3 mJy/beam. The value 14.1 mJy/beam corresponds to a top-hat beam of the same FWHM. If the ETC assumes a Gaussian beam, the target polarized flux should be 20.3 mJy/beam, not 14.1 mJy/beam, which increases the required integration time by a factor of (20.3/14.1)^2 ~ 2.1 (i.e., 170 h -> ~350 h). Please state the beam-solid-angle convention used in the ETC and verify the conversion.
  2. [§4, Table 1] The 170-hour estimate is not reproducible from the information given. The paper cites the PRIMAger ETC but does not list its input parameters: detector NEP or NEFD, bandwidth, optical throughput, telescope temperature/emissivity, assumed astrophysical and telescope backgrounds, and the overhead fraction. Table 1 states 'including overheads' but no overhead breakdown is provided. Since integration time scales as (NEFD)^2, a 40% NEFD error changes the required time by a factor of ~2, and a factor-2 error changes it by 4x. Please provide the full ETC inputs, or a table of the assumed instrument parameters, so that the calculation can be independently checked. The PPI1-PPI3 sensitivities in Table 1 (2.52, 1.94, 1.37 MJy/sr) inherit the same fragility, and without the per-band ETC outputs it is not clear that these bands reach the claimed 1.0-2.4 MJy/sr range in the same 170 h.
  3. [§4] The assumed 20% polarization fraction for cirrus is the maximum value seen in the diffuse ISM (Planck XIX), not a typical value. If the typical polarization fraction at the cirrus confusion level is 10%, the polarized intensity is 0.5 MJy/sr, and the time required for a 5-sigma detection quadruples (600+ hours). The sentence 'will ensure detection of polarized emission at all higher column densities' relies on the empirical trend p proportional to I^{-alpha} with 0<alpha<1; this trend is plausible but the specific exponent range should be referenced, and the statement should be explicitly conditional on p=20%. Please present the time estimate as a function of assumed polarization fraction (e.g., 10-20%) and adjust the abstract and summary language accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4] Typo: 'sensitvity' should be 'sensitivity'.
  2. [§5] Typo: 'oberservations' should be 'observations'.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] 'Planck plane-of sky magnetic field vectors' should be 'plane-of-sky'.
  4. [§4/Table 1] The text says the estimate is for 'the most stringent case' and Table 1 says 'including overheads', but the overhead fraction is never defined. Please specify what overheads are included (e.g., slewing, calibration, sky subtraction).
  5. [§4] The use of Herschel 250 micron brightness as a proxy for PPI4 235 micron Stokes I is reasonable given the close wavelengths, but the difference in dust emissivity and the SPIRE vs PPI4 beam sizes should be noted as a source of systematic uncertainty in the confusion-level calibration.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One target-restated-as-outcome; the central 170-hour estimate rests on an external ETC, so overall circularity is minimal.

  1. self definitional [Section 4 (Time estimate), Table 1; echoed in the Abstract]
    "Assuming 20% polarization in the most diffuse regions of molecular clouds, we expect that the cirrus confusion limit in total intensity (5 MJy/sr) will have a surface brightness in polarized intensity of 1 MJy/sr. Our target is thus to achieve a good detection in polarized intensity where P = 1MJy/sr. ... The time required to map the area observed by the Herschel Gould Belt Survey (160 deg2) to the cirrus confusion limit in polarized light is 170 hours. This will give a 5-sigma detection of 20% polarized low-density cirrus emission"

    The claimed outcome (a 5-sigma detection of 20% polarized cirrus at P = 1.0 MJy/sr) is exactly the input sensitivity target: 1.0 MJy/sr is set by construction as 0.2 × 5 MJy/sr, and the ETC time is chosen so that the 5-sigma P sensitivity in PPI4 equals 1.0 MJy/sr. The Abstract then restates that chosen target as a result that the survey 'will give'. This is a definitional restatement rather than an independent prediction. However, the 170-hour number itself is not forced by this definition alone; it is obtained from the external PRIMAger Exposure Time Calculator, so the circularity is minor and does not drive the central derivation.

full rationale

The central chain is: Herschel/SPIRE cirrus confusion at 250 µm (5 MJy/sr, external) is taken as the PPI4 Stokes I confusion level; Planck XIX supplies the ~20% maximum polarization fraction in diffuse ISM (external); the product gives the PPI4 polarized-intensity target of 1 MJy/sr; the PRIMAger ETC (an external instrument model, not derived in this paper) then yields 1.1 h per square degree and 170 h for 160 deg². None of these inputs is defined in terms of the final claim, and the 170-hour estimate would be an independent sensitivity calculation even if the abstract's phrasing weakly collapses the target and the outcome. The model magnetic-field maps in Section 5 are explicitly described as 'not a prediction' and are only illustrative, so they do not constitute a fitted-input-called-prediction step. No load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness argument is used to force the result. The only circular flavor is the target-restated-as-outcome for the 5-sigma detection statement, which justifies a low nonzero score but not a finding of substantive circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are the assumed polarization fraction and the illustrative transition surface brightness in the model field maps. The 170-hour estimate is built on two explicit domain assumptions: 250 micron brightness maps to PPI4 Stokes I, and 20% polarization in cirrus.

free parameters (3)
  • Cirrus polarization fraction = 0.2 (20%)
    Assumed polarization fraction for low-density cirrus emission, based on Planck diffuse ISM measurements (Section 4). The target detection is defined as 5-sigma detection of 20% polarized cirrus. If the true cirrus polarization is lower, the required time increases.
  • Transition column density between parallel and perpendicular field alignment = 950 MJy/sr at 250 micron
    The center of the sigmoid function that sets the artificial magnetic field geometry in the model Ophiuchus maps (Section 5). Chosen arbitrarily to demonstrate capability, not to match observations. This parameter does not affect the 170-hour estimate but is a free parameter in the demonstration figures.
  • Sigmoid smoothing width for field transition = not specified
    The sigmoid function used to smooth the parallel-to-perpendicular transition in the model field geometry is described but its width is not given. A free choice in constructing the illustrative maps.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Herschel SPIRE 250 micron brightness is comparable to PRIMAger PPI4 (235 micron) Stokes I.
    Explicitly stated in Section 4. The entire time estimate converts 5 MJy/sr at 250 micron to a requirement at 235 micron without a spectral correction. Reasonable for a cold dust SED, but the colors of cirrus and cloud material vary.
  • standard math Dust polarization traces the plane-of-sky magnetic field direction with a well-established grain alignment mechanism.
    Standard astrophysics assumption cited to refs 9, 128-130. The survey's scientific value depends on this. Not controversial in this subfield, but it is an unproven background assumption in the strict sense.
  • domain assumption Maximum polarization fraction in diffuse ISM is about 20%.
    Taken from Planck results (ref 10, Section 4). This sets the target polarized intensity of 1 MJy/sr. If the cirrus confusion limit is 5 MJy/sr but polarization is lower than 20%, the detection threshold rises.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping Magnetic Fields from Clouds to Cores with PRIMAger." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTUQ2T2H

@misc{pith2026250901796,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping Magnetic Fields from Clouds to Cores with PRIMAger},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTUQ2T2H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01796}
}
abstract

High-resolution, wide-area mapping of magnetic field geometries within molecular clouds, and the star-forming filaments and cores within them, is crucial in order to understand the role of magnetic fields in the star formation process. We therefore propose an unbiased survey of star-forming molecular clouds within 0.5 kpc of the Earth in polarized light with the PRIMAger Polarimetry Imager. We will map magnetic fields over entire molecular clouds at linear resolutions of $\sim10^{-3}-10^{-2}$ pc ($\sim10^{3}-10^{4}$ au) in PRIMAger Bands PPI1 - PPI4, thereby resolving magnetic field structure both within individual star-forming filaments and cores, and in the most diffuse regions of molecular clouds. These multi-wavelength polarimetric observations will allow us to systematically investigate both the wide range of open questions about the role of magnetic fields in star formation and the evolution of the interstellar medium, and interstellar dust grain properties. The time required to map the area observed by the \textit{Herschel} Gould Belt Survey (160 deg$^{2}$) to the cirrus confusion limit in polarized light is 170 hours. This will give a 5-$\sigma$ detection of 20% polarized low-density cirrus emission, with surface brightnesses in polarized intensity of 1.0-2.4\,MJy/sr across the PRIMAger bands, and will ensure detection of polarized emission at all higher column densities. This time estimate can be simply scaled up in order to map magnetic fields in a larger sample of molecular clouds, including more distant regions of higher-mass star formation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

166 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pattle , L

    K. Pattle , L. Fissel , M. Tahani , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: from Clouds to Cores ,'' in Protostars and Planets VII , S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , et al. , Eds., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 534 , 193 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Beck , A

    R. Beck , A. Brandenburg , D. Moss , et al. , `` Galactic Magnetism: Recent Developments and Perspectives ,'' 34 , 155--206 (1996)

    1996

  3. [3]

    Tsukamoto , A

    Y. Tsukamoto , A. Maury , B. Commercon , et al. , `` The Role of Magnetic Fields in the Formation of Protostars, Disks, and Outflows ,'' in Protostars and Planets VII , S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , et al. , Eds., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 534 , 317 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    J. D. Soler , `` Using Herschel and Planck observations to delineate the role of magnetic fields in molecular cloud structure ,'' 629 , A96 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    P. C. Myers and S. Basu , `` Magnetic Properties of Star-forming Dense Cores ,'' 917 , 35 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    T. C. Ching , D. Li , C. Heiles , et al. , `` An early transition to magnetic supercriticality in star formation ,'' 601 , 49--52 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Palmeirim , P

    P. Palmeirim , P. Andr \'e , J. Kirk , et al. , `` Herschel view of the Taurus B211/3 filament and striations: evidence of filamentary growth? ,'' 550 , A38 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    T. G. S. Pillai , D. P. Clemens , S. Reissl , et al. , `` Magnetized filamentary gas flows feeding the young embedded cluster in Serpens South ,'' Nature Astronomy 4 , 1195--1201 (2020)

    2020

Show all 166 references
  1. [9]

    B. G. Andersson , A. Lazarian , and J. E. Vaillancourt , `` Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment ,'' 53 , 501--539 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Planck Collaboration , P. A. R. Ade , N. Aghanim , et al. , `` Planck intermediate results. XIX. An overview of the polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust ,'' 576 , A104 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Friberg , P

    P. Friberg , P. Bastien , D. Berry , et al. , `` POL-2: a polarimeter for the James-Clerk-Maxwell telescope ,'' in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy VIII , W. S. Holland and J. Zmuidzinas , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical In...

    2016

  4. [12]

    Ward-Thompson , K

    D. Ward-Thompson , K. Pattle , P. Bastien , et al. , `` First Results from BISTRO: A SCUBA-2 Polarimeter Survey of the Gould Belt ,'' 842 , 66 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    J. Liu , K. Qiu , D. Berry , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: The Magnetic Field in the Starless Core Ophiuchus C ,'' 877 , 43 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Coud \'e , P

    S. Coud \'e , P. Bastien , M. Houde , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: The Magnetic Field of the Barnard 1 Star-forming Region ,'' 877 , 88 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Eswaraiah , D

    C. Eswaraiah , D. Li , R. S. Furuya , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Revealing the Diverse Magnetic Field Morphologies in Taurus Dense Cores with Sensitive Submillimeter Polarimetry ,'' 912 , L27 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Karoly , D

    J. Karoly , D. Ward-Thompson , K. Pattle , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Studying the Complex Magnetic Field of L43 ,'' 952 , 29 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Pattle , D

    K. Pattle , D. Ward-Thompson , D. Berry , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: The Magnetic Field Strength in the Orion A Filament ,'' 846 , 122 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Y. Doi , T. Hasegawa , R. S. Furuya , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Magnetic Fields Associated with a Network of Filaments in NGC 1333 ,'' 899 , 28 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Kwon , K

    W. Kwon , K. Pattle , S. Sadavoy , et al. , `` B-fields in Star-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Magnetic Fields in the Filamentary Structures of Serpens Main ,'' 926 , 163 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Arzoumanian , R

    D. Arzoumanian , R. S. Furuya , T. Hasegawa , et al. , `` Dust polarized emission observations of NGC 6334. BISTRO reveals the details of the complex but organized magnetic field structure of the high-mass star-forming hub-filament network ,'' 647 , A78 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Hwang , J

    J. Hwang , J. Kim , K. Pattle , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: A Spiral Magnetic Field in a Hub-filament Structure, Monoceros R2 ,'' 941 , 51 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Ching , K

    T.-C. Ching , K. Qiu , D. Li , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO-2 Survey: Magnetic Fields of the Massive DR21 Filament ,'' 941 , 122 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Karoly , D

    J. Karoly , D. Ward-Thompson , K. Pattle , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Magnetic Fields Align with Orbital Structure in the Galactic Center ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.11552 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Yang , S.-P

    M.-Z. Yang , S.-P. Lai , J. Karoly , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Unveiling the Magnetic Fields around Galactic Center ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.05198 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tang , P

    Y.-W. Tang , P. T. P. Ho , P. M. Koch , et al. , `` Evolution of Magnetic Fields in High-Mass Star Formation: Linking Field Geometry and Collapse for the W51 e2/e8 Cores ,'' 700 , 251--261 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    Zhang , K

    Q. Zhang , K. Qiu , J. M. Girart , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields and Massive Star Formation ,'' 792 , 116 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Ching , S.-P

    T.-C. Ching , S.-P. Lai , Q. Zhang , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields in the Massive Dense Cores of the DR21 Filament: Weakly Magnetized Cores in a Strongly Magnetized Filament ,'' 838 , 121 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    S. I. Sadavoy , P. C. Myers , I. W. Stephens , et al. , `` Dust Polarization toward Embedded Protostars in Ophiuchus with ALMA. I. VLA 1623 ,'' 859 , 165 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Fern \'a ndez-L \'o pez , P

    M. Fern \'a ndez-L \'o pez , P. Sanhueza , L. A. Zapata , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). I. Linear Polarized Imaging of the Ultracompact H II Region G5.89-0.39 ,'' 913 , 29 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Sanhueza , J

    P. Sanhueza , J. M. Girart , M. Padovani , et al. , `` Gravity-driven Magnetic Field at 1000 au Scales in High-mass Star Formation ,'' 915 , L10 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    L. M. Fissel , P. A. R. Ade , F. E. Angil \`e , et al. , `` The balloon-borne large-aperture submillimeter telescope for polarimetry: BLAST-Pol ,'' in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy V , W. S. Holland and J. Zmuidzinas , ...

    2010

  24. [32]

    N. N. Gandilo , P. A. R. Ade , F. E. Angil \`e , et al. , `` Submillimeter Polarization Spectrum in the Vela C Molecular Cloud ,'' 824 , 84 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    L. M. Fissel , P. A. R. Ade , F. E. Angil \`e , et al. , `` Relative Alignment between the Magnetic Field and Molecular Gas Structure in the Vela C Giant Molecular Cloud Using Low- and High-density Tracers ,'' 878 , 110 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Reinacher , F

    A. Reinacher , F. Graf , B. Greiner , et al. , `` The SOFIA Telescope in Full Operation ,'' Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 7 , 1840007 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    D. A. Harper , M. C. Runyan , C. D. Dowell , et al. , `` HAWC+, the Far-Infrared Camera and Polarimeter for SOFIA ,'' Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 7 , 1840008--1025 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    D. T. Chuss , B. G. Andersson , J. Bally , et al. , `` HAWC+/SOFIA Multiwavelength Polarimetric Observations of OMC-1 ,'' 872 , 187 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    F. P. Santos , D. T. Chuss , C. D. Dowell , et al. , `` The Far-infrared Polarization Spectrum of Ophiuchi A from HAWC+/SOFIA Observations ,'' 882 , 113 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    I. W. Stephens , P. C. Myers , C. Zucker , et al. , `` The Magnetic Field in the Milky Way Filamentary Bone G47 ,'' 926 , L6 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Andr \'e , A

    P. Andr \'e , A. Men'shchikov , S. Bontemps , et al. , `` From filamentary clouds to prestellar cores to the stellar IMF: Initial highlights from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey ,'' 518 , L102 (2010)

    2010

  32. [40]

    K \"o nyves , P

    V. K \"o nyves , P. Andr \'e , A. Men'shchikov , et al. , `` A census of dense cores in the Aquila cloud complex: SPIRE/PACS observations from the Herschel Gould Belt survey ,'' 584 , A91 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Ladjelate , P

    B. Ladjelate , P. Andr \'e , V. K \"o nyves , et al. , `` The Herschel view of the dense core population in the Ophiuchus molecular cloud ,'' 638 , A74 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Schneider , P

    N. Schneider , P. Andr \'e , V. K \"o nyves , et al. , `` What Determines the Density Structure of Molecular Clouds? A Case Study of Orion B with Herschel ,'' 766 , L17 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    Kwon , Y

    J. Kwon , Y. Doi , M. Tamura , et al. , `` A First Look at BISTRO Observations of the Oph-A core ,'' 859 , 4 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Zucker , J

    C. Zucker , J. S. Speagle , E. F. Schlafly , et al. , `` A Large Catalog of Accurate Distances to Local Molecular Clouds: The Gaia DR2 Edition ,'' 879 , 125 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    J. E. Pineda , D. Arzoumanian , P. Andre , et al. , `` From Bubbles and Filaments to Cores and Disks: Gas Gathering and Growth of Structure Leading to the Formation of Stellar Systems ,'' in Protostars and Planets VII , S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , et al. , Eds., Astron...

    2023

  38. [46]

    Motte , A

    F. Motte , A. Zavagno , S. Bontemps , et al. , `` Initial highlights of the HOBYS key program, the Herschel imaging survey of OB young stellar objects ,'' 518 , L77 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    Molinari , E

    S. Molinari , E. Schisano , D. Elia , et al. , `` Hi-GAL, the Herschel infrared Galactic Plane Survey: photometric maps and compact source catalogues. First data release for the inner Milky Way: +68 l -70 ,'' 591 , A149 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Zucker , C

    C. Zucker , C. Battersby , and A. Goodman , `` Physical Properties of Large-scale Galactic Filaments ,'' 864 , 153 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    J. F. C. Wardle and P. P. Kronberg , `` The linear polarization of quasi-stellar radio sources at 3.71 and 11.1 centimeters. ,'' 194 , 249 (1974)

    1974

  42. [50]

    Montier , S

    L. Montier , S. Plaszczynski , F. Levrier , et al. , `` Polarization measurement analysis. II. Best estimators of polarization fraction and angle ,'' 574 , A136 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    ``Commission 40: Radio astronomy (radio astronomie),'' Transactions of the International Astronomical Union 15 (2), 165–167 (1973)

    1973

  44. [52]

    Pattle , S.-P

    K. Pattle , S.-P. Lai , T. Hasegawa , et al. , `` JCMT BISTRO Survey Observations of the Ophiuchus Molecular Cloud: Dust Grain Alignment Properties Inferred Using a Ricean Noise Model ,'' 880 , 27 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    D. C. B. Whittet , J. H. Hough , A. Lazarian , et al. , `` The Efficiency of Grain Alignment in Dense Interstellar Clouds: a Reassessment of Constraints from Near-Infrared Polarization ,'' 674 , 304--315 (2008)

    2008

  46. [54]

    J. D. Soler , P. Hennebelle , P. G. Martin , et al. , `` An Imprint of Molecular Cloud Magnetization in the Morphology of the Dust Polarized Emission ,'' 774 , 128 (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    L \^e , L

    N. L \^e , L. N. Tram , A. Karska , et al. , `` Mapping and characterizing magnetic fields in the Rho Ophiuchus-A molecular cloud with SOFIA/HAWC+ ,'' 690 , A191 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Reissl , S

    S. Reissl , S. Wolf , and R. Brauer , `` Radiative transfer with POLARIS. I. Analysis of magnetic fields through synthetic dust continuum polarization measurements ,'' 593 , A87 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Palau , N

    A. Palau , N. Hu \'e lamo , D. Barrado , et al. , `` Observations of pre- and proto-brown dwarfs in nearby clouds: Paving the way to further constraining theories of brown dwarf formation ,'' 99 , 101711 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Di Francesco , J

    J. Di Francesco , J. Keown , C. Fallscheer , et al. , `` Herschel Gould Belt Survey Observations of Dense Cores in the Cepheus Flare Clouds ,'' 904 , 172 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Davis , `` The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields ,'' Physical Review 81 , 890--891 (1951)

    L. Davis , `` The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields ,'' Physical Review 81 , 890--891 (1951)

    1951

  52. [60]

    Chandrasekhar and E

    S. Chandrasekhar and E. Fermi , `` Magnetic Fields in Spiral Arms. ,'' 118 , 113 (1953)

    1953

  53. [61]

    R. H. Hildebrand , L. Kirby , J. L. Dotson , et al. , `` Dispersion of Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. I ,'' 696 , 567--573 (2009)

    2009

  54. [62]

    Houde , J

    M. Houde , J. E. Vaillancourt , R. H. Hildebrand , et al. , `` Dispersion of Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. II. ,'' 706 , 1504--1516 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    Lazarian , K

    A. Lazarian , K. H. Yuen , and D. Pogosyan , `` Magnetic Field Strength from Turbulence Theory. I. Using Differential Measure Approach ,'' 935 , 77 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    Skalidis and K

    R. Skalidis and K. Tassis , `` High-accuracy estimation of magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium from dust polarization ,'' 647 , A186 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    J. Liu , Q. Zhang , B. Commer c on , et al. , `` Calibrating the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi Method with Numerical Simulations: Uncertainties in Estimating the Magnetic Field Strength from Statistics of Field Orientations ,'' 919 , 79 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    P. S. Li , E. Lopez-Rodriguez , H. Ajeddig , et al. , `` Mapping the magnetic field in the Taurus/B211 filamentary cloud with SOFIA HAWC + and comparing with simulation ,'' 510 , 6085--6109 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Pillai , J

    T. Pillai , J. Kauffmann , J. C. Tan , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields in High-mass Infrared Dark Clouds ,'' 799 , 74 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    Cho and H

    J. Cho and H. Yoo , `` A Technique for Constraining the Driving Scale of Turbulence and a Modified Chandrasekhar-Fermi Method ,'' 821 , 21 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Hwang , J

    J. Hwang , J. Kim , K. Pattle , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: The Distribution of Magnetic Field Strengths toward the OMC-1 Region ,'' 913 , 85 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    R. M. Crutcher , D. J. Nutter , D. Ward-Thompson , et al. , `` SCUBA Polarization Measurements of the Magnetic Field Strengths in the L183, L1544, and L43 Prestellar Cores ,'' 600 , 279--285 (2004)

    2004

  63. [71]

    Chen , P

    C.-Y. Chen , P. K. King , Z.-Y. Li , et al. , `` A new method to trace three-dimensional magnetic field structure within molecular clouds using dust polarization ,'' 485 , 3499--3513 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    Hu and A

    Y. Hu and A. Lazarian , `` Probing 3D magnetic fields - I. Polarized dust emission ,'' 519 , 3736--3748 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    P. M. Koch , Y.-W. Tang , and P. T. P. Ho , `` Magnetic Field Strength Maps for Molecular Clouds: A New Method Based on a Polarization-Intensity Gradient Relation ,'' 747 , 79 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    P. M. Koch , Y.-W. Tang , P. T. P. Ho , et al. , `` The Importance of the Magnetic Field from an SMA-CSO-combined Sample of Star-forming Regions ,'' 797 , 99 (2014)

    2014

  67. [75]

    di Francesco , N

    J. di Francesco , N. J. Evans , II, P. Caselli , et al. , `` An Observational Perspective of Low-Mass Dense Cores I: Internal Physical and Chemical Properties ,'' in Protostars and Planets V , B. Reipurth , D. Jewitt , and K. Keil , Eds., 17 (2007)

    2007

  68. [76]

    E. C. Ostriker , J. M. Stone , and C. F. Gammie , `` Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models ,'' 546 , 980--1005 (2001)

    2001

  69. [77]

    A. J. Rigby , T. J. T. Moore , R. Plume , et al. , `` CHIMPS: the ^ 13 CO/C ^ 18 O (J = 3 2) Heterodyne Inner Milky Way Plane Survey ,'' 456 , 2885--2899 (2016)

    2016

  70. [78]

    Schuller , T

    F. Schuller , T. Csengeri , J. S. Urquhart , et al. , `` SEDIGISM: Structure, excitation, and dynamics of the inner Galactic interstellar medium ,'' 601 , A124 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    J. R. Goicoechea , C. H. M. Pabst , S. Kabanovic , et al. , `` Molecular globules in the Veil bubble of Orion. IRAM 30 m ^ 12 CO, ^ 13 CO, and C ^ 18 O (2-1) expanded maps of Orion A ,'' 639 , A1 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Park , M

    G. Park , M. J. Currie , H. S. Thomas , et al. , `` ^ 12 CO (3-2) High-Resolution Survey (COHRS) of the Galactic Plane: Complete Data Release ,'' 264 , 16 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    R. K. Friesen , J. E. Pineda , co-PIs , et al. , `` The Green Bank Ammonia Survey: First Results of NH _ 3 Mapping of the Gould Belt ,'' 843 , 63 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    Fuente , D

    A. Fuente , D. G. Navarro , P. Caselli , et al. , `` Gas phase Elemental abundances in Molecular cloudS (GEMS). I. The prototypical dark cloud TMC 1 ,'' 624 , A105 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Klaassen , A

    P. Klaassen , A. Traficante , M. Beltr \'a n , et al. , `` Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (AtLAST) science: Our Galaxy ,'' Open Research Europe 4 , 112 (2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    Inutsuka , T

    S.-i. Inutsuka , T. Inoue , K. Iwasaki , et al. , `` The formation and destruction of molecular clouds and galactic star formation. An origin for the cloud mass function and star formation efficiency ,'' 580 , A49 (2015)

    2015

  77. [85]

    Walch , P

    S. Walch , P. Girichidis , T. Naab , et al. , `` The SILCC (SImulating the LifeCycle of molecular Clouds) project - I. Chemical evolution of the supernova-driven ISM ,'' 454 , 238--268 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    Kim and E

    C.-G. Kim and E. C. Ostriker , `` Three-phase Interstellar Medium in Galaxies Resolving Evolution with Star Formation and Supernova Feedback (TIGRESS): Algorithms, Fiducial Model, and Convergence ,'' 846 , 133 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    Hennebelle , `` The FRIGG project: From intermediate galactic scales to self-gravitating cores ,'' 611 , A24 (2018)

    P. Hennebelle , `` The FRIGG project: From intermediate galactic scales to self-gravitating cores ,'' 611 , A24 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    E. N. Parker , `` The Dynamical State of the Interstellar Gas and Field ,'' 145 , 811 (1966)

    1966

  81. [89]

    L. F. S. Rodrigues , G. R. Sarson , A. Shukurov , et al. , `` The Parker Instability in Disk Galaxies ,'' 816 , 2 (2016)

    2016

  82. [90]

    D. L. Jow , R. Hill , D. Scott , et al. , `` An application of an optimal statistic for characterizing relative orientations ,'' 474 , 1018--1027 (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    Z. A. Khan , K. Pattle , and S. F. Graves , `` Magnetic fields under feedback: a case study of the massive star-forming hub G34.26 + 0.15 ,'' 535 , 107--122 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    J. P. Perry , K. Pattle , D. Johnstone , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: the magnetized evolution of star-forming cores in the Ophiuchus molecular cloud interpreted using histograms of relative orientation ,'' 536 , 1736--1751 (2025)

    2025

  85. [93]

    J. D. Soler and P. Hennebelle , `` What are we learning from the relative orientation between density structures and the magnetic field in molecular clouds? ,'' 607 , A2 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Seifried , S

    D. Seifried , S. Walch , M. Weis , et al. , `` From parallel to perpendicular - On the orientation of magnetic fields in molecular clouds ,'' 497 , 4196--4212 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    M. R. Krumholz and C. Federrath , `` The Role of Magnetic Fields in Setting the Star Formation Rate and the Initial Mass Function ,'' Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 6 , 7 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    C. L. H. Hull , R. L. Plambeck , A. D. Bolatto , et al. , `` Misalignment of Magnetic Fields and Outflows in Protostellar Cores ,'' 768 , 159 (2013)

    2013

  89. [97]

    C. L. H. Hull and Q. Zhang , `` Interferometric observations of magnetic fields in forming stars ,'' Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 6 , 3 (2019)

    2019

  90. [98]

    Huang , J

    B. Huang , J. M. Girart , I. W. Stephens , et al. , `` On the Magnetic Field Properties of Protostellar Envelopes in Orion ,'' 963 , L31 (2024)

    2024

  91. [99]

    H.-W. Yen , P. M. Koch , C. L. H. Hull , et al. , `` The JCMT BISTRO Survey: Alignment between Outflows and Magnetic Fields in Dense Cores/Clumps ,'' 907 , 33 (2021)

    2021

  92. [100]

    D. Xu , S. S. R. Offner , R. Gutermuth , et al. , `` A Census of Outflow to Magnetic Field Orientations in Nearby Molecular Clouds ,'' 941 , 81 (2022)

    2022

  93. [101]

    I. W. Stephens , M. M. Dunham , P. C. Myers , et al. , `` Alignment between Protostellar Outflows and Filamentary Structure ,'' 846 , 16 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    Kong , H

    S. Kong , H. G. Arce , M. J. Maureira , et al. , `` Widespread Molecular Outflows in the Infrared Dark Cloud G28.37+0.07: Indications of Orthogonal Outflow-filament Alignment ,'' 874 , 104 (2019)

    2019

  95. [103]

    S. E. Clark , J. E. G. Peek , and M. E. Putman , `` Magnetically Aligned H I Fibers and the Rolling Hough Transform ,'' 789 , 82 (2014)

    2014

  96. [104]

    S. E. Clark , J. C. Hill , J. E. G. Peek , et al. , `` Neutral Hydrogen Structures Trace Dust Polarization Angle: Implications for Cosmic Microwave Background Foregrounds ,'' 115 , 241302 (2015)

    2015

  97. [105]

    S. E. Clark , J. E. G. Peek , and M. A. Miville-Desch \^e nes , `` The Physical Nature of Neutral Hydrogen Intensity Structure ,'' 874 , 171 (2019)

    2019

  98. [106]

    P. M. W. Kalberla , J. Kerp , and U. Haud , `` H I filaments are cold and associated with dark molecular gas. HI4PI-based estimates of the local diffuse CO-dark H _ 2 distribution ,'' 639 , A26 (2020)

    2020

  99. [107]

    K. H. Yuen , K. W. Ho , and A. Lazarian , `` Technique for Separating Velocity and Density Contributions in Spectroscopic Data and Its Application to Studying Turbulence and Magnetic Fields ,'' 910 , 161 (2021)

    2021

  100. [108]

    Y. Hu , A. Lazarian , D. Alina , et al. , `` Nature of striation in 21 cm channel Maps: velocity caustics ,'' 524 , 2994--3019 (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    P. M. W. Kalberla , `` Caustics and velocity caustics in the diffuse interstellar medium at high Galactic latitudes ,'' 683 , A36 (2024)

    2024

  102. [110]

    K. H. Yuen , K. W. Ho , C. Y. Law , et al. , `` Neutral hydrogen filaments in interstellar media: Are they physical? ,'' Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics 8 , 21 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    D. F. Gonz \'a lez-Casanova and A. Lazarian , `` Velocity Gradients as a Tracer for Magnetic Fields ,'' 835 , 41 (2017)

    2017

  104. [112]

    K. H. Yuen and A. Lazarian , `` Tracing Interstellar Magnetic Field Using Velocity Gradient Technique: Application to Atomic Hydrogen Data ,'' 837 , L24 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Y. Hu , K. H. Yuen , V. Lazarian , et al. , `` Magnetic field morphology in interstellar clouds with the velocity gradient technique ,'' Nature Astronomy 3 , 776--782 (2019)

    2019

  106. [114]

    Schmaltz , Y

    T. Schmaltz , Y. Hu , and A. Lazarian , `` Parallel and perpendicular alignments of velocity gradient and magnetic field observed in the molecular clouds L1478 and L1482 ,'' 523 , 1853--1866 (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    Schmaltz , Y

    T. Schmaltz , Y. Hu , and A. Lazarian , `` Velocity gradient and stellar polarization: magnetic field tomography towards the L1688 cloud ,'' 528 , 3897--3908 (2024)

    2024

  108. [116]

    K. H. Yuen and A. Lazarian , `` Tracing interstellar magnetic field using the velocity gradient technique in shock and self-gravitating media ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1703.03026 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  109. [117]

    M. Liu , Y. Hu , and A. Lazarian , `` Magnetic fields and velocity gradients in L1551: the role of stellar feedback ,'' 530 , 1066--1077 (2024)

    2024

  110. [118]

    Hsieh , Y

    C.-h. Hsieh , Y. Hu , S.-P. Lai , et al. , `` Tracing Magnetic Field Morphology Using the Velocity Gradient Technique in the Presence of CO Self-absorption ,'' 873 , 16 (2019)

    2019

  111. [119]

    Soam , K

    A. Soam , K. H. Yuen , I. Stephens , et al. , `` Applying the Velocity Gradient Technique in NGC 1333: Comparison with Dust Polarization Observations ,'' 976 , 254 (2024)

    2024

  112. [120]

    S. E. Clark and B. S. Hensley , `` Mapping the Magnetic Interstellar Medium in Three Dimensions over the Full Sky with Neutral Hydrogen ,'' 887 , 136 (2019)

    2019

  113. [121]

    S. E. Clark , `` A New Probe of Line-of-sight Magnetic Field Tangling ,'' 857 , L10 (2018)

    2018

  114. [122]

    M. C.-Y. Chen , L. M. Fissel , S. I. Sadavoy , et al. , `` Relative alignments between magnetic fields, velocity gradients, and dust emission gradients in NGC 1333 ,'' 533 , 1938--1959 (2024)

    1938

  115. [123]

    Y. Hu , A. Lazarian , and K. H. Yuen , `` Velocity Gradient in the Presence of Self-gravity: Identifying Gravity-induced Inflow and Determining Collapsing Stage ,'' 897 , 123 (2020)

    2020

  116. [124]

    Y. Hu , A. Lazarian , and S. Stanimirovi \'c , `` Revealing Gravitational Collapse in the Serpens G3-G6 Molecular Cloud Using Velocity Gradients ,'' 912 , 2 (2021)

    2021

  117. [125]

    Xu , C.-Y

    D. Xu , C.-Y. Law , and J. C. Tan , `` Application of Convolutional Neural Networks to Predict Magnetic Fields' Directions in Turbulent Clouds ,'' 942 , 95 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Y. Hu , A. Lazarian , Y. Wu , et al. , `` Probing three-dimensional magnetic fields: II - an interpretable Convolutional Neural Network ,'' 527 , 11240--11255 (2024)

    2024

  119. [127]

    D. Xu , J. Karcheski , C.-Y. Law , et al. , `` Exploring Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds through Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models ,'' 980 , 52 (2025)

    2025

  120. [128]

    Aghanim , Y

    Planck Collaboration , N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami , et al. , `` Planck 2018 results. XII. Galactic astrophysics using polarized dust emission ,'' 641 , A12 (2020)

    2018

  121. [129]

    Hoang , `` Effects of Grain Alignment with Magnetic Fields on Grain Growth and the Structure of Dust Aggregates ,'' 928 , 102 (2022)

    T. Hoang , `` Effects of Grain Alignment with Magnetic Fields on Grain Growth and the Structure of Dust Aggregates ,'' 928 , 102 (2022)

    2022

  122. [130]

    L. N. Tram and T. Hoang , `` Recent progress in theory and observational study of dust grain alignment and rotational disruption in star-forming regions ,'' Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 9 , 923927 (2022)

    2022

  123. [131]

    Lazarian and T

    A. Lazarian and T. Hoang , `` Radiative torques: analytical model and basic properties ,'' 378 , 910--946 (2007)

    2007

  124. [132]

    F. O. Alves , P. Frau , J. M. Girart , et al. , `` On the radiation driven alignment of dust grains: Detection of the polarization hole in a starless core ,'' 569 , L1 (2014)

    2014

  125. [133]

    T. J. Jones , M. Bagley , M. Krejny , et al. , `` Grain Alignment in Starless Cores ,'' 149 , 31 (2015)

    2015

  126. [134]

    N. B. Ngoc , P. N. Diep , T. Hoang , et al. , `` B-fields and Dust in Interstellar Filaments Using Dust Polarization (BALLAD-POL). I. The Massive Filament G11.11-0.12 Observed by SOFIA/HAWC+ ,'' 953 , 66 (2023)

    2023

  127. [135]

    N. B. Ngoc , T. Hoang , P. N. Diep , et al. , `` B-fields and Dust in Interstellar Filaments Using Dust Polarization (BALLAD-POL). II. Testing the Radiative Torque Paradigm in Musca and OMC-1 ,'' 974 , 118 (2024)

    2024

  128. [136]

    Pravash , A

    S. Pravash , A. Soam , P. N. Diep , et al. , `` B-fields and Dust in Interstellar Filaments Using Dust Polarization (BALLAD-POL). III. Grain Alignment and Disruption Mechanisms in G34.43+0.24 Using Polarization Observations from JCMT/POL-2 ,'' 981 , 128 (2025)

    2025

  129. [137]

    Tazaki , A

    R. Tazaki , A. Lazarian , and H. Nomura , `` Radiative Grain Alignment In Protoplanetary Disks: Implications for Polarimetric Observations ,'' 839 , 56 (2017)

    2017

  130. [138]

    Lazarian , `` Two Modes of Carbonaceous Dust Alignment ,'' 902 , 97 (2020)

    A. Lazarian , `` Two Modes of Carbonaceous Dust Alignment ,'' 902 , 97 (2020)

    2020

  131. [139]

    Hoang , J

    T. Hoang , J. Cho , and A. Lazarian , `` Alignment of Irregular Grains by Mechanical Torques ,'' 852 , 129 (2018)

    2018

  132. [140]

    C. L. H. Hull , H. Yang , P. C. Cort \'e s , et al. , `` Polarization from Aligned Dust Grains in the Pic Debris Disk ,'' 930 , 49 (2022)

    2022

  133. [141]

    Pattle , S.-P

    K. Pattle , S.-P. Lai , M. Wright , et al. , `` OMC-1 dust polarization in ALMA Band 7: diagnosing grain alignment mechanisms in the vicinity of Orion Source I ,'' 503 , 3414--3433 (2021)

    2021

  134. [142]

    B. G. Andersson , J. Karoly , P. Bastien , et al. , `` Submillimeter-wavelength Polarimetry of IRC+10216 ,'' 963 , 76 (2024)

    2024

  135. [143]

    Silsbee and B

    K. Silsbee and B. T. Draine , `` Radiation Pressure on Fluffy Submicron-sized Grains ,'' 818 , 133 (2016)

    2016

  136. [144]

    Hoang , L

    T. Hoang , L. N. Tram , H. Lee , et al. , `` Grain Alignment and Disruption by Radiative Torques in Dense Molecular Clouds and Implication for Polarization Holes ,'' 908 , 218 (2021)

    2021

  137. [145]

    V. J. M. Le Gouellec , B. G. Andersson , A. Soam , et al. , `` The Origin of Dust Polarization in the Orion Bar ,'' 951 , 97 (2023)

    2023

  138. [146]

    L. N. Tram , T. Hoang , H. Wiesemeyer , et al. , `` Understanding the multi-wavelength thermal dust polarisation from the Orion molecular cloud in light of the radiative torque paradigm ,'' 689 , A290 (2024)

    2024

  139. [147]

    Silsbee , B

    K. Silsbee , B. S. Hensley , J. R. Szalay , et al. , `` A Rotational Disruption Crisis for Zodiacal Dust ,'' 982 , L57 (2025)

    2025

  140. [148]

    Lee , C.-Y

    D. Lee , C.-Y. Chen , G. Novak , et al. , `` Modeling the Far-infrared Polarization Spectrum of a High-mass Star-forming Cloud ,'' 972 , 102 (2024)

    2024

  141. [149]

    J. E. Vaillancourt , C. D. Dowell , R. H. Hildebrand , et al. , `` New Results on the Submillimeter Polarization Spectrum of the Orion Molecular Cloud ,'' 679 , L25 (2008)

    2008

  142. [150]

    P. C. Ashton , P. A. R. Ade , F. E. Angil \`e , et al. , `` First Observation of the Submillimeter Polarization Spectrum in a Translucent Molecular Cloud ,'' 857 , 10 (2018)

    2018

  143. [151]

    J. M. Michail , P. C. Ashton , M. G. Berthoud , et al. , `` Far-infrared Polarization Spectrum of the OMC-1 Star-forming Region ,'' 907 , 46 (2021)

    2021

  144. [152]

    Guillet , L

    V. Guillet , L. Fanciullo , L. Verstraete , et al. , `` Dust models compatible with Planck intensity and polarization data in translucent lines of sight ,'' 610 , A16 (2018)

    2018

  145. [153]

    B. S. Hensley and B. T. Draine , `` The Astrodust+PAH Model: A Unified Description of the Extinction, Emission, and Polarization from Dust in the Diffuse Interstellar Medium ,'' 948 , 55 (2023)

    2023

  146. [154]

    Hwang , K

    J. Hwang , K. Pattle , H. Parsons , et al. , `` Magnetic Fields in the Horsehead Nebula ,'' 165 , 198 (2023)

    2023

  147. [155]

    C. H. M. Pabst , J. R. Goicoechea , D. Teyssier , et al. , `` [C II] emission from L1630 in the Orion B molecular cloud ,'' 606 , A29 (2017)

    2017

  148. [156]

    R. L. Karim , M. W. Pound , A. G. G. M. Tielens , et al. , `` SOFIA FEEDBACK Survey: The Pillars of Creation in [C II] and Molecular Lines ,'' 166 , 240 (2023)

    2023

  149. [157]

    Pattle , D

    K. Pattle , D. Ward-Thompson , T. Hasegawa , et al. , `` First Observations of the Magnetic Field inside the Pillars of Creation: Results from the BISTRO Survey ,'' 860 , L6 (2018)

    2018

  150. [158]

    Tahani , P

    M. Tahani , P. Bastien , R. S. Furuya , et al. , `` JCMT BISTRO Observations: Magnetic Field Morphology of Bubbles Associated with NGC 6334 ,'' 944 , 139 (2023)

    2023

  151. [159]

    P. E. Dewdney , P. J. Hall , R. T. Schilizzi , et al. , `` The Square Kilometre Array ,'' IEEE Proceedings 97 , 1482--1496 (2009)

    2009

  152. [160]

    E. J. Murphy , A. Bolatto , S. Chatterjee , et al. , `` The ngVLA Science Case and Associated Science Requirements ,'' in Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array , E. Murphy , Ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 517 , 3 (2018)

    2018

  153. [161]

    Dickinson , R

    C. Dickinson , R. Beck , R. Crocker , et al. , `` SKA studies of in situ synchrotron radiation from molecular clouds ,'' in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14) , 102 (2015)

    2015

  154. [162]

    Tahani , R

    M. Tahani , R. Plume , J. C. Brown , et al. , `` Helical magnetic fields in molecular clouds?. A new method to determine the line-of-sight magnetic field structure in molecular clouds ,'' 614 , A100 (2018)

    2018

  155. [163]

    Carpenter , C

    J. Carpenter , C. Brogan , D. Iono , et al. , `` The ALMA Wideband Sensitivity Upgrade ,'' in Physics and Chemistry of Star Formation: The Dynamical ISM Across Time and Spatial Scales , V. Ossenkopf-Okada , R. Schaaf , I. Breloy , et al. , Eds., 304 (2023)

    2023

  156. [164]

    R. M. Crutcher and A. J. Kemball , `` Review of Zeeman Effect Observations of Regions of Star Formation K Zeeman Effect, Magnetic Fields, Star formation, Masers, Molecular clouds ,'' Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 6 , 66 (2019)

    2019

  157. [165]

    Robishaw , J

    T. Robishaw , J. Green , G. Surcis , et al. , `` Measuring Magnetic Fields Near and Far with the SKA via the Zeeman Effect ,'' in Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14) , 110 (2015)

    2015

  158. [166]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.