Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Magnetic Worms: Oscillatory Bimeron Pairing And Collective Transport In Patterned Stripes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Periodic edge notches turn bimeron transport in a magnetic stripe into a worm-like collective state, stabilizing eight bimerons that a smooth stripe cannot hold.

desk verdict The central observation of oscillatory bimeron pairs under constant drive is plausible and interesting, but missing damping and single-run stability evidence leave the claims under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02384 v1 pith:MH7QIKCY submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mes-hall

Jose Toledo-Marin , Mario Castro , David Galvez-Poblete , Bruno Grossi , Sebastián Castillo-Sepúlveda , Alvaro S. Nunez , Sebastian Allende This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magneticbimeronwormedgedefectsdomainwallracetrackmemoryspin-orbittorquemicromagneticsimulationoscillatorytransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Periodic edge notches in a magnetic stripe do more than slow bimerons down: this paper claims they create a transport regime never seen before. A single bimeron keeps a predictable, nearly linear current-velocity relation; two bimerons translate together while their separation oscillates at a frequency set by the current; eight bimerons, which cannot survive in a smooth stripe, are stabilized by the notches and move in a segmented, worm-like way. If correct, the result turns a known nuisance, defect pinning, into a design tool for current-tunable oscillators and for packing more quasiparticles into a racetrack. The practical stakes are that bits could be encoded in relative oscillations or phase, not just in position.

What carries the argument

The central object is the domain-wall bimeron, a composite magnetic quasiparticle with two oppositely charged halves confined inside a longitudinal domain wall in a thin ferromagnetic stripe. The mechanism that carries the argument is the interplay between the periodic notches and the bimeron's internal charge structure: each notch imprints alternating magnetic charges at its corners; as the leading bimeron enters a notch it slows, the trailing bimeron catches up under attraction between their opposite out-of-plane components, and a repulsion between like-signed components then pushes them apart. That cycle gives a bounded relative oscillation while the center of mass keeps moving. The paper

What would settle it

Repeat the eight-bimeron smooth-stripe simulation with several Gilbert damping values, for instance 0.01 to 0.1, and with slightly perturbed bimeron spacings. If any run keeps the domain wall intact and the train translating, the claim that periodic defects are required to stabilize eight bimerons is false. A complementary check: continuously reduce notch depth toward zero and look for the point where the two-bimeron oscillation disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that edge defects are not merely obstacles: when a bimeron is embedded in a longitudinal domain wall inside a thin ferromagnetic stripe, a periodic array of notches produces a bounded, self-sustained oscillation of the bimeron's separation from its neighbors while the whole train continues to translate. With one bimeron, the effect is only a speed reduction that preserves a nearly linear current-velocity relation. With two, the center of mass advances at almost constant velocity while the separation between the two textures oscillates, with frequency increasing and amplitude decreasing as the drive current rises. With eight, the oscillations des

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the simulated damping constant and the chosen initial configuration represent the real physics; the paper never states the Gilbert damping value, so the oscillation frequencies and the claim that eight bimerons fail in a smooth stripe cannot yet be checked or generalized.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single bimeron in a patterned stripe keeps an approximately linear velocity-current relation, so current control of transport survives the introduction of defects.
  • Two-bimeron separation oscillates at a frequency that increases and an amplitude that decreases with current, giving a MHz-scale signal tunable by drive current.
  • The center-of-mass velocity of a bimeron train grows with current but falls as the number of bimerons grows, so denser trains trade speed for storage capacity.
  • Eight-bimeron trains, which disintegrate in a smooth stripe, remain stable when periodic notches are present, so defects can be engineered deliberately rather than avoided.
  • The oscillation frequency and amplitude depend on notch depth, width, and spacing, meaning defect geometry is another control knob alongside current.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same notch geometry could make a bimeron pair behave as an injection-locked oscillator, so a natural test is whether two pairs on parallel stripes synchronize through their common substrate coupling.
  • The claim that eight bimerons fail without notches rests on one simulated run; repeating the smooth-stripe case across damping values and initial spacings would show whether the stabilization is robust or configuration-specific.
  • The worm state looks like desynchronized coupled oscillators; measuring the phase relation between neighboring bimeron trajectories could connect it to standard synchronization theory.
  • If bimeron phases can be preset at injection, the oscillating pair could encode information in relative phase rather than position, a coding scheme the paper mentions but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports micromagnetic simulations (MuMax3) of one, two, and eight bimerons confined in a longitudinal domain wall inside a ferromagnetic stripe with periodic edge notches. For a single bimeron, the notches reduce the steady velocity while preserving a nearly linear v–J relation. For two bimerons in the patterned stripe, the center of mass advances at constant speed while the bimeron separation undergoes a sustained oscillation whose frequency increases and amplitude decreases with current; an underdamped harmonic-oscillator model (Eqs. 2–4) is fitted to the simulated trajectories. For eight bimerons, the pairwise oscillations desynchronize, producing a segmented, worm-like collective motion; the authors report that eight bimerons cannot be stabilized in a smooth stripe but are stabilized by the periodic defects. The central claims are the existence of bounded relative oscillations of bimeron pairs and the defect-stabilization of dense bimeron trains.

Significance. If the reported behavior is robust, the paper identifies a new dynamical regime: confined magnetic solitons that translate together while undergoing sustained internal oscillations under a constant current. This is distinct from the usual rigid, velocity-matched transport of skyrmion/bimeron trains and could be relevant for current-controlled nano-oscillators and phase-coded racetrack devices. The paper's strengths are its direct trajectory-level evidence, quantitative summaries (frequency, amplitude, CM velocity), and a crisp, falsifiable prediction that periodic defects stabilize eight bimerons while a smooth stripe fails. The main weaknesses are the absence of the Gilbert damping value, the single-run basis for the stability comparison, and the fitted (not predictive) oscillator model. These issues limit reproducibility but do not, by themselves, invalidate the qualitative observations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model, Eq. (1)] The Gilbert damping constant α is introduced in Eq. (1) but its numerical value is never reported in the Model section or elsewhere. α controls the dissipation rate and thus determines whether the relative coordinate is underdamped (sustained oscillation) or overdamped (decay to a fixed separation). The reported values f ≈ 194 MHz and A ≈ 18.3 nm at J = 2.0×10^10 A/m² cannot be reproduced or assessed without α. Please state the value used and, ideally, show the dependence of the oscillation amplitude and lifetime on α over a physically relevant range.
  2. [Results, after Fig. 5(c)] The claim that eight bimerons cannot be sustained in a smooth stripe while periodic defects stabilize them rests on a single simulation run in which 'one bimeron became unstable and the wall disintegrated.' This is a load-bearing comparison for the defect-stabilization claim. The result could depend on the specific initial configuration, relaxation protocol, notch geometry, or finite-size effects. Please provide multiple independent realizations (e.g., different initial separations or random perturbations) and, if possible, a parameter sweep, to show that the failure in the smooth stripe and the stabilization by the periodic defects are robust.
  3. [Results, Eqs. (2)–(4) and Fig. 3(d) inset] The harmonic-oscillator model of Eqs. (2)–(4) is fit to the simulated x1(t), x2(t) using six constants (Xcm,0, Vcm, AR, Φ, X0, Ω) read from the same trajectory. The inset of Fig. 3(d) is therefore an interpolation, not an independent prediction, and the good agreement does not provide additional evidence for the underlying mechanism. Please reframe the model as a parameterization, or validate it by predicting the oscillation frequency/amplitude for a different current density or notch geometry and then comparing with a fresh simulation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption] Typo: 'funcion' should be 'function'.
  2. [Model, nucleation protocol] The text first describes a current-pulse nucleation and then says 'for simplicity, the bimeron domain wall is nucleated by defining a small circular zone... with the magnetization set to −ẑ.' Please clarify which protocol was actually used in the reported simulations, and whether the two protocols yield equivalent relaxed states.
  3. [Fig. 3(d) inset caption] The phrase 'compare the predictions of the simplified model' overstates the status of Eqs. (2)–(4), which are fitted to the same simulation. Suggest wording such as 'compare the fitted harmonic model with the simulated trajectory'.
  4. [Introduction, line 'prospect of enhancing current'] The phrase 'enhancing current' is unclear; likely 'enhancing current-driven functionality' or similar. Please revise.
  5. [Results, Fig. 2(d)] The v versus J curves appear to be linear fits or guides; please state whether these are fits and, if so, report the fitting parameters (slope and intercept) rather than only the point at J = 2×10^10 A/m².

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central simulation results are not circular; the harmonic-oscillator model is a non-load-bearing fit that is loosely called a 'prediction.'

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, Eqs. (2)–(4) and inset of Fig. 3(d)]
    "The inset of Fig. 3.d compares the predictions of the simplified model with the numerical results in the stationary regime, for the representative case J = 2.0 × 10^10 A/m2. The fitting constants obtained are Xcm,0 = 80.52 nm, Vcm = 19.41 m/s, AR = 18 nm, Φ = −1.5287, X0 = 73 nm, and Ω = 1.226 rad/ns."

    All six constants in Eq. (4) are extracted from the same micromagnetic trajectory that the inset claims to predict: Vcm matches the reported center-of-mass velocity (≈19.40 m/s), X0 matches ⟨Δx⟩ ≈ 73 nm, AR matches the measured amplitude ≈18.3 nm, and Ω corresponds to f ≈194 MHz. Feeding these fitted parameters back into Eq. (4) reproduces the simulation by construction, so the inset is an interpolation, not an independent test. The paper does not derive Ω, AR, or X0 from material parameters or use the model to predict a different current or geometry, so this is a fitted-input-called-prediction step rather than a load-bearing derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claims — single-bimeron velocity reduction by edge defects, two-bimeron relative oscillation, and defect-stabilized eight-bimeron transport — rest on direct MuMax3 micromagnetic simulations, not on the simplified Lagrangian model. The Lagrangian (Eqs. 2–4) is introduced after the oscillations are observed and its parameters are explicitly called 'fitting constants'; it is a phenomenological interpolation of the simulated trajectories. Thus the main physical observations are self-contained and not circular. The only circularity is the loose wording 'predictions of the simplified model' applied to an inset that uses parameters fitted from the very data being compared. This is minor and does not affect the validity of the simulation-based conclusions. Other reviewer concerns, such as the unreported Gilbert damping α and the single-run comparison for eight bimerons, are reproducibility/robustness issues rather than circularity. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness-theorem arguments are used.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central simulation result rests on standard micromagnetics (LLG+SOT) plus the stable existence of bimeron domain walls in a Co/Pt stripe. The main unstated load-bearing numbers are the Gilbert damping alpha (never reported) and the hand-chosen notch geometry. The oscillator model introduces a linear spring by fiat, and its constants are fit to data.

free parameters (3)
  • Gilbert damping alpha = not reported
    Appears in Eq. (1) but its numerical value is never stated in the Model section; all velocities, oscillation amplitudes, and train stability depend on it.
  • Oscillator model constants = Xcm,0 = 80.52 nm, Vcm = 19.41 m/s, AR = 18 nm, Phi = -1.5287, X0 = 73 nm, Omega = 1.226 rad/ns
    Fitted to the simulated trajectories for the J = 2.0e10 A/m^2 case (inset of Fig. 3d); the model reproduces the simulation by construction.
  • Notch geometry = d = 15 nm, w = 20 nm, delta = 80 nm
    Hand-chosen defect parameters; the paper states in the supplement that oscillation properties depend on these values, so they are not derived from a rule.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption LLG equation with damping-like spin-orbit torque (Eq. 1) governs magnetization dynamics
    Standard model for ferromagnet/heavy-metal bilayers, cited from refs. 41-45; assumes exchange, anisotropy, magnetostatic, DMI, and SOT terms with field-like torque set to zero.
  • domain assumption Bimeron domain wall is a stable, trackable object with a well-defined center position
    The paper extracts x_i(t) for each bimeron; this assumes the textures remain coherent and identifiable over the simulated times.
  • ad hoc to paper Notch corners acquire alternating magnetic charges that interact with the bimeron's charges
    Proposed mechanism in Results; not derived from a model, used to explain the velocity reduction and oscillation.
  • ad hoc to paper Bimeron-bimeron interaction can be represented by an elastic spring (Eq. 2)
    Postulated harmonic interaction used only for the fitted model.
invented entities (1)
  • Magnetic worm collective state
    purpose: Name for the desynchronized, segmented transport of 8 bimerons in a patterned stripe
    A simulation-observed dynamic state, not a new physical entity or conserved quantity; no independent experimental handle proposed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic Worms: Oscillatory Bimeron Pairing And Collective Transport In Patterned Stripes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MH7QIKCY

@misc{pith2026250902384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic Worms: Oscillatory Bimeron Pairing And Collective Transport In Patterned Stripes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MH7QIKCY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02384}
}
abstract

Magnetic bimerons in a domain wall provide a practical route for current driven transport in patterned magnetic stripes. However, coupling between bimerons and pinning by defects complicate reliable motion. Here we show that a periodic array of edge defects both stabilizes transport of multiple bimerons and gives rise to a distinctive collective state, the magnetic worm. A single bimeron travels at constant speed; defects lower this speed while preserving an approximately linear relation between velocity $v$ and current density $J$. With two bimerons, the center of mass advances nearly uniformly while their separation exhibits a bounded oscillation whose frequency increases and amplitude decreases with current. For larger trains, these oscillations lose synchrony, producing segmented, worm like motion. The center of mass speed grows with current but decreases as the number of bimerons increases. Notably, eight bimerons cannot be sustained in a smooth stripe but can be stabilized by the periodic defects

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02384 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of the patterned nanostripe geometry. The geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Current-driven dynamics of a bimeron domain wall in smooth and patterned [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) and (b) Magnetic profiles of two domain wall bimerons at different times, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Distance between two domain wall bimerons as a funcion of time for a current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Magnetic profiles of eight bimerons domain wall at different time instants, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications

    Hirohata, A.; Yamada, K.; Nakatani, Y.; Prejbeanu, I.-L.; Di´ eny, B.; Pirro, P.; Hillebrands, B. Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2020, 509, 166711. 13

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Magnetic texture based magnonics

    Yu, H.; Xiao, J.; Schultheiss, H. Magnetic texture based magnonics. Physics Reports 2021, 905, 1–59

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Parkin, S. S. P.; Hayashi, M.; Thomas, L. Magnetic Domain-Wall Racetrack Memory. Science 2008, 320, 190–194

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Memory on the racetrack

    Parkin, S.; Yang, S.-H. Memory on the racetrack. Nature Nanotechnology 2015, 10, 195–198

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    K.; Deniz, H.; Migliorini, A.; Zhang, W.; Parkin, S

    Gu, K.; Guan, Y.; Hazra, B. K.; Deniz, H.; Migliorini, A.; Zhang, W.; Parkin, S. S. P. Three-dimensional racetrack memory devices designed from freestanding magnetic het- erostructures. Nature Nanotechnology 2022, 17, 1065–1071

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Hayashi, M.; Thomas, L.; Moriya, R.; Rettner, C.; Parkin, S. S. P. Current-Controlled Magnetic Domain-Wall Nanowire Shift Register. Science 2008, 320, 209–211

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    J.; Schultheiss, H.; Leven, B.; Hille- brands, B

    Han, D.-S.; Kim, S.-K.; Lee, J.-Y.; Hermsdoerfer, S. J.; Schultheiss, H.; Leven, B.; Hille- brands, B. Magnetic domain-wall motion by propagating spin waves. Applied Physics Letters 2009, 94

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Emori, S.; Bauer, U.; Ahn, S.-M.; Martinez, E.; Beach, G. S. D. Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nature Materials 2013, 12, 611–616

    work page 2013

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Asymmetric magnetic domain-wall motion by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.Physical Review B 2013, 88

    Je, S.-G.; Kim, D.-H.; Yoo, S.-C.; Min, B.-C.; Lee, K.-J.; Choe, S.-B. Asymmetric magnetic domain-wall motion by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.Physical Review B 2013, 88

    2013

  2. [10]

    D.; Jin, Y

    Geng, L. D.; Jin, Y. M. Magnetic vortex racetrack memory. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 2017, 423, 84–89

    2017

  3. [11]

    Magnetic Vortex Dynamics

    Antos, R.; Otani, Y.; Shibata, J. Magnetic Vortex Dynamics. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 2008, 77, 031004. 14

    2008

  4. [12]

    Choe, S.-B.; Acremann, Y.; Scholl, A.; Bauer, A.; Doran, A.; St¨ ohr, J.; Padmore, H. A. Vortex Core-Driven Magnetization Dynamics. Science 2004, 304, 420–422

    2004

  5. [13]

    Skyrmions on the track

    Fert, A.; Cros, V.; Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nature Nanotechnology 2013, 8, 152–156

    2013

  6. [14]

    M.; Weigand, M.; Agrawal, P.; Lemesh, I.; Mawass, M.-A.; Fischer, P.; Kl¨ aui, M.; Beach, G

    Woo, S.; Litzius, K.; Kr¨ uger, B.; Im, M.-Y.; Caretta, L.; Richter, K.; Mann, M.; Krone, A.; Reeve, R. M.; Weigand, M.; Agrawal, P.; Lemesh, I.; Mawass, M.-A.; Fischer, P.; Kl¨ aui, M.; Beach, G. S. D. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-drive...

    2016

  7. [15]

    E.; Wolter, B.; von Bergmann, K.; Kubetzka, A.; Wiesendanger, R

    Romming, N.; Hanneken, C.; Menzel, M.; Bickel, J. E.; Wolter, B.; von Bergmann, K.; Kubetzka, A.; Wiesendanger, R. Writing and Deleting Single Magnetic Skyrmions. Science 2013, 341, 636–639

    2013

  8. [16]

    Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet.Science 2009, 323, 915–919

    M¨ uhlbauer, S.; Binz, B.; Jonietz, F.; Pfleiderer, C.; Rosch, A.; Neubauer, A.; Georgii, R.; B¨ uni, P. Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet.Science 2009, 323, 915–919

    2009

  9. [17]

    A strategy for the design of skyrmion racetrack memories

    Tomasello, R.; Martinez, E.; Zivieri, R.; Torres, L.; Carpentieri, M.; Finocchio, G. A strategy for the design of skyrmion racetrack memories. Scientific Reports 2014, 4

    2014

  10. [18]

    Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions

    Zhang, X.; Ezawa, M.; Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Scientific Reports 2015, 5

    2015

  11. [19]

    G¨ obel, B.; Mook, A.; Henk, J.; Mertig, I.; Tretiakov, O. A. Magnetic bimerons as skyrmion analogues in in-plane magnets. Physical Review B 2019, 99

    2019

  12. [20]

    A.; Altbir, D.; Galvez-Poblete, D.; Corona, R

    Castro, M. A.; Altbir, D.; Galvez-Poblete, D.; Corona, R. M.; Oyarz´ un, S.; Pereira, A. R.; Allende, S.; Carvalho-Santos, V. L. Skyrmion-bimeron dynamic conversion in magnetic nanotracks. Physical Review B 2023, 108. 15

    2023

  13. [21]

    A.; Zhao, G.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y

    Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Shen, L.; Ezawa, M.; Tretiakov, O. A.; Zhao, G.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y. Static and dynamic properties of bimerons in a frustrated ferromagnetic monolayer. Physical Review B 2020, 101

    2020

  14. [22]

    A.; Ezawa, M.; Zhou, Y

    Shen, L.; Li, X.; Xia, J.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, X.; Tretiakov, O. A.; Ezawa, M.; Zhou, Y. Dy- namics of ferromagnetic bimerons driven by spin currents and magnetic fields. Physical Review B 2020, 102

    2020

  15. [23]

    A.; Xu, X.; Mruczkiewicz, M.; Krawczyk, M.; Xu, Y.; Evans, R

    Li, X.; Shen, L.; Bai, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Ezawa, M.; Tretiakov, O. A.; Xu, X.; Mruczkiewicz, M.; Krawczyk, M.; Xu, Y.; Evans, R. F. L.; Chantrell, R. W.; Zhou, Y. Bimeron clusters in chiral antiferromagnets. npj Computational Materials 2020, 6

    2020

  16. [24]

    G.; de Souza, S

    Silva-Junior, A. G.; de Souza, S. F.; Teixeira, A. W.; Laroze, D.; Pereira, A. R.; Fon- seca, J. M.; Carvalho-Santos, V. L. Bimeron stability and non-reciprocal energy behavior in magnetic nanodots. Applied Physics Letters 2024, 125

    2024

  17. [25]

    Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions

    Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Nanotechnology 2013, 8, 899–911

    2013

  18. [26]

    Thomas, L.; Hayashi, M.; Jiang, X.; Moriya, R.; Rettner, C.; Parkin, S. S. P. Oscillatory dependence of current-driven magnetic domain wall motion on current pulse length. Nature 2006, 443, 197–200

    2006

  19. [27]

    L.; Walker, L

    Schryer, N. L.; Walker, L. R. The motion of 180 ° domain walls in uniform dc magnetic fields. Journal of Applied Physics 1974, 45, 5406–5421

    1974

  20. [28]

    P.; Metaxas, P

    Mougin, A.; Cormier, M.; Adam, J. P.; Metaxas, P. J.; Ferr´ e, J. Domain wall mobility, stability and Walker breakdown in magnetic nanowires.Europhysics Letters (EPL) 2007, 78, 57007. 16

    2007

  21. [29]

    Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets

    Iwasaki, J.; Mochizuki, M.; Nagaosa, N. Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets. Nature Communications 2013, 4

    2013

  22. [30]

    A.; F¨ orster, J.; Reeve, R

    Litzius, K.; Lemesh, I.; Kr¨ uger, B.; Bassirian, P.; Caretta, L.; Richter, K.; B¨ uttner, F.; Sato, K.; Tretiakov, O. A.; F¨ orster, J.; Reeve, R. M.; Weigand, M.; Bykova, I.; Stoll, H.; Sch¨ utz, G.; Beach, G. S. D.; Kl¨ aui, M. Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by direct time- ...

    2016

  23. [31]

    E.; Cheng, X.; Heinonen, O.; Wang, K

    Jiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Yu, G.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Benjamin Jungfleisch, M.; Pear- son, J. E.; Cheng, X.; Heinonen, O.; Wang, K. L.; Zhou, Y.; Hoffmann, A.; te Velthuis, S. G. E. Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. Nature Physics 2016, 13, 162–169

    2016

  24. [32]

    L.; Nunez, A

    Castro, M.; G´ alvez-Poblete, D.; Castillo-Sep´ ulveda, S.; Carvalho-Santos, V. L.; Nunez, A. S.; Allende, S. Bimerons as Edge States in Thin Magnetic Strips.Nano Letters 2025, 25, 7249–7257

    2025

  25. [33]

    Enhanced skyrmion motion via strip domain wall

    Xing, X.; ˚Akerman, J.; Zhou, Y. Enhanced skyrmion motion via strip domain wall. Physical Review B 2020, 101

    2020

  26. [34]

    Guiding of dynamic skyrmions using chiral magnetic domain wall

    Song, M.; Moon, K.-W.; Yang, S.; Hwang, C.; Kim, K.-J. Guiding of dynamic skyrmions using chiral magnetic domain wall. Applied Physics Express 2020, 13, 063002

    2020

  27. [35]

    Inhibition of Skyrmion Hall Effect by a Stripe Domain Wall

    Yang, S.; Wu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Liang, X.; Xia, J.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, X.; Zhou, Y. Inhibition of Skyrmion Hall Effect by a Stripe Domain Wall. Physical Review Applied 2022, 18

    2022

  28. [36]

    Current-driven motion of magnetic domain wall skyrmions

    Nie, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z. Current-driven motion of magnetic domain wall skyrmions. Applied Physics Letters 2025, 126

    2025

  29. [37]

    P.; Fangohr, H.; Liu, J

    Zhang, X.; Zhao, G. P.; Fangohr, H.; Liu, J. P.; Xia, W. X.; Xia, J.; Morvan, F. J. Skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge repulsions in skyrmion-based racetrack memory. Scientific Reports 2015, 5. 17

    2015

  30. [38]

    E.; Castro, M

    Saji, C.; Saavedra, E.; Troncoso, R. E.; Castro, M. A.; Allende, S.; Nunez, A. S. Magnon- ics along the wall in bimeron chain domain walls. Physical Review B 2025, 111

    2025

  31. [39]

    Magnetic bimeron traveling on the domain wall

    Chen, J.; Shen, L.; An, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Du, H.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y. Magnetic bimeron traveling on the domain wall. Applied Physics Letters 2025, 126

    2025

  32. [40]

    A.; Li, X

    Chen, J.; Shen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Tretiakov, O. A.; Li, X. Current-induced Dynamics of Bloch Domain-wall Bimerons. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00959

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    The design and verification of MuMax3

    Vansteenkiste, A.; Leliaert, J.; Dvornik, M.; Helsen, M.; Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Van Waeyenberge, B. The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Advances 2014, 4

    2014

  34. [42]

    Classics in Magnetics A Phenomenological Theory of Damping in Ferromag- netic Materials

    Gilbert, T. Classics in Magnetics A Phenomenological Theory of Damping in Ferromag- netic Materials. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2004, 40, 3443–3449

    2004

  35. [43]

    M.; Hessing, P.; Geil- hufe, J.; Caretta, L.; Engel, D.; Kr¨ uger, B.; Viefhaus, J.; Eisebitt, S.; Beach, G

    B¨ uttner, F.; Lemesh, I.; Schneider, M.; Pfau, B.; G¨ unther, C. M.; Hessing, P.; Geil- hufe, J.; Caretta, L.; Engel, D.; Kr¨ uger, B.; Viefhaus, J.; Eisebitt, S.; Beach, G. S. D. Field-free deterministic ultrafast creation of magnetic skyrmions by spin–orbit torques. Nature ...

    2017

  36. [44]

    J.; Gudmundsen, T

    Liu, L.; Lee, O. J.; Gudmundsen, T. J.; Ralph, D. C.; Buhrman, R. A. Current-Induced Switching of Perpendicularly Magnetized Magnetic Layers Using Spin Torque from the Spin Hall Effect. Physical Review Letters 2012, 109

    2012

  37. [45]

    J.; Bassirian, P.; Gypens, P.; Mulkers, J.; Litzius, K.; Van Waeyenberge, B.; Leliaert, J

    Joos, J. J.; Bassirian, P.; Gypens, P.; Mulkers, J.; Litzius, K.; Van Waeyenberge, B.; Leliaert, J. Tutorial: Simulating modern magnetic material systems in mumax3. Journal of Applied Physics 2023, 134

    2023

  38. [46]

    Tunable magnetic skyrmions in spintronic nanos- tructures for cellular-level magnetic neurostimulation

    Saha, R.; Wu, K.; Su, D.; Wang, J.-P. Tunable magnetic skyrmions in spintronic nanos- tructures for cellular-level magnetic neurostimulation. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2019, 52, 465002. 18

    2019

  39. [47]

    Real-Space Obser- vation of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion in Submicron Magnetic Wires

    Yamaguchi, A.; Ono, T.; Nasu, S.; Miyake, K.; Mibu, K.; Shinjo, T. Real-Space Obser- vation of Current-Driven Domain Wall Motion in Submicron Magnetic Wires. Physical Review Letters 2004, 92

    2004

  40. [48]

    R.; Senapati, K

    Bhatia, E.; Hussain, Z.; Reddy, V. R.; Senapati, K. Study of magnetization reversal in N´ eel and Bloch regime of nickel and permalloy stripes using Kerr microscopy. Physica B: Condensed Matter 2021, 609, 412877

    2021

  41. [49]

    Efficient and controlled do- main wall nucleation for magnetic shift registers

    Alejos, O.; Raposo, V.; Sanchez-Tejerina, L.; Martinez, E. Efficient and controlled do- main wall nucleation for magnetic shift registers. Scientific Reports 2017, 7

    2017

  42. [50]

    Nucleation and manipulation of single skyrmions using spin- polarized currents in antiferromagnetic skyrmion-based racetrack memories

    Belrhazi, H.; El Hafidi, M. Nucleation and manipulation of single skyrmions using spin- polarized currents in antiferromagnetic skyrmion-based racetrack memories. Scientific Reports 2022, 12

    2022

  43. [51]

    Fast locomotion in caterpillars

    Brackenbury, J. Fast locomotion in caterpillars. Journal of Insect Physiology 1999, 45, 525–533

    1999

  44. [52]

    Metarpillar: Soft robotic loco- motion based on buckling-driven elastomeric metamaterials

    Grossi, B.; Palza, H.; Zagal, J.; Falc´ on, C.; During, G. Metarpillar: Soft robotic loco- motion based on buckling-driven elastomeric metamaterials. Materials &; Design 2021, 212, 110285

    2021

  45. [53]

    S.; Acu˜ na, D.; Palza, H

    Silva, B.; Govan, J.; Crist´ obal Zagal, J.; Grossi, B.; Roldan, A.; Nunez, A. S.; Acu˜ na, D.; Palza, H. A biomimetic smart kirigami soft metamaterial with multimodal remote loco- motion mechanisms. Materials &; Design 2023, 233, 112262

    2023

  46. [54]

    Skyrmion motion and partitioning of domain wall velocity driven by repulsive interactions

    Xing, X.; Zhou, Y. Skyrmion motion and partitioning of domain wall velocity driven by repulsive interactions. Communications Physics 2022, 5. 19

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.