Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Widely non-degenerate nonlinear frequency conversion in cryogenic titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cryogenic titanium-diffused lithium niobate waveguides phase-match a designed 1560/949 nm photon-pair process at 6.6 K, with measured spectra matching the model once effective length and poling period are optimized.

desk verdict Solid cryogenic benchmark of a visible-pumped type-0 SPDC process in Ti:PPLN; the advertised "model match" is weaker than it looks because part of the model was fit to the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02392 v1 pith:PSF7VY4A submitted 2025-09-02 quant-ph

Nina Amelie Lange , Sebastian Lengeling , Philipp Mues , Viktor Quiring , Werner Ridder , Christof Eigner , Harald Herrmann , Christine Silberhorn
show 1 more author
Tim J. Bartley
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords cryogeniclithiumniobatetitaniumin-diffusedwaveguidesspontaneousparametricdown-conversiontype-0phasematchingquasi-phasephotorefractiveeffectpyroelectricjointspectralintensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguide can be designed in advance to perform a widely non-degenerate photon-pair process at cryogenic temperature, even though the material's pyroelectric and photorefractive behavior degrades the guiding of the TM-polarized light it relies on. The authors pick a type-0 process in which pump, signal, and idler are all TM-polarized, pumped at 590 nm to produce photon pairs near 1556 nm and 950 nm at 6.6 K. They show that the measured joint spectral intensity is reproduced by their simulation once the effective interaction length (3.8 ± 0.3 mm) and poling period (9.654 ± 0.002 µm) are optimized, with the poling period deviating only 0.15% from design. The consequence is that the phase-matching model, not the observed inefficiency, is the verified part: cryogenic operation costs conversion efficiency through charge-related loss of effective length, but the designed wavelengths are still reached. If true, this gives other cryogenic nonlinear platforms a quantitative benchmark.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the quasi-phase-matching condition Δk(T) = kp − ks − ki + 2π/Λ(T), evaluated with simulated TM00 effective indices from extrapolated cryogenic Sellmeier data and a temperature-corrected poling period. Type-0 means all three interacting fields share the TM polarization, which exploits the largest nonlinear coefficient but also makes the process most sensitive to charge-induced index changes. The joint-spectral-intensity simulation, which convolves phase matching with the pump spectral profile and spectrometer resolution, is fitted by optimizing effective length and poling period; agreement of the optimized poling period with the fabricated one is what carries the verifi

What would settle it

Measure the phase-matching wavelengths of a second, independently designed TM-only type-0 process (for example a different signal/idler pair) on the same chip at 6.6 K, and require that the same optimized effective length and poling period reproduce both measured joint spectral intensities; if a single pair of fitted parameters cannot, the empirical TM correction is absorbing a polarization-specific error rather than verifying the model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At 6.6 K, a periodically poled titanium in-diffused waveguide with a 9.64 µm design period phase-matches a type-0 process — pump, signal, and idler all TM-polarized — pumped at 590 nm, producing signal photons at 1560.4 ± 0.3 nm and idler photons at 948.6 ± 0.2 nm, versus designed values of 1556 nm and 950 nm. The measured joint spectral intensity is reproduced by the model once the simulation optimizes an effective interaction length of 3.8 ± 0.3 mm and a poling period of 9.654 ± 0.002 µm, which deviates only 0.15% from the fabricated value. The paper reads this as verification that the cryogenic refractive-index extrapolation predicts TM phase matching well enough to design a wavelength co

Load-bearing premise

The weakest point is the assumption that the empirical fix to the refractive-index model, calibrated on earlier measurements that mixed two polarizations, applies exactly to the pure-TM process here; if it does not, fitting the effective length and poling period could hide the mismatch.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The designed 1560 nm/949 nm photon-pair combination is achievable at 6.6 K without temperature tuning, because the cryogenic phase-matching point is set by fabrication.
  • The dominant cryogenic penalty is not a phase-matching error but reduced TM guiding: cryogenic transmission drops and the fitted effective length is only about 16.6% of the poled length, so efforts to improve efficiency should target charge accumulation, not the dispersion model.
  • The measured wavelengths are reproducible across and within cooling cycles within about 0.3 nm, so the source can serve as a fixed-wavelength reference even though its efficiency varies.
  • The results constitute a first benchmark for cryogenic nonlinear frequency conversion against which platforms such as thin-film lithium niobate can compare.
  • A TE-pumped type-0 process may actually outperform the TM process cryogenically, as suggested by the TE-induced noise process observed in the idler arm; the paper flags this as future work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cleanest test of the paper's verification would be a second TM-only process at a different wavelength combination on the same chip: if one fixed (effective length, poling period) cannot reproduce both measured joint spectral intensities, the fitted parameters are absorbing a TM-specific index error rather than confirming the model.
  • The paper's reuse of a mixed-polarization calibration leaves open that the TM extraordinary-index correction differs; a direct low-temperature measurement of the TM-mode effective index, for example through prism coupling or a reference interferometer, would separate polarization effects from fabrication tolerances.
  • Because the visible photorefractive threshold appears to lie in the low-microwatt range under continuous-wave illumination while pulsed pumping at tens of microwatts stays linear, a deliberate comparison of CW and pulsed operation at equal average power could map the damage threshold and guide practical source design.
  • If charge accumulation is the bottleneck, a conductive or charge-dissipating surface layer on z-cut Ti:PPLN is a testable mitigation: it should raise TM transmission and effective length while leaving the phase-matching wavelengths unchanged if the model is correct.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a cryogenic characterization of a type-0 SPDC process in a Ti:PPLN waveguide pumped at ~590 nm, with signal/idler near 1560 nm and 949 nm. At 6.6 K the authors observe strongly degraded TM-polarized guiding, substrate-mode leakage, irregular phase-matching side peaks, ~0.3 nm run-to-run center-wavelength shifts, and a low (<µW-level) visible-power threshold. They compare the measured joint spectral intensity with two simulations: one using design parameters (Simulation 1) and one optimizing effective length and poling period (Simulation 2). The paper concludes that the spectral properties match the theoretical model and that the reduced performance is caused by charge-related degradation of guiding rather than by failure of the phase-matching model.

Significance. If the model-verification claim were supported, this would provide a useful benchmark for cryogenic nonlinear integrated photonics, showing that a fixed poling period can yield reproducible widely non-degenerate photon pairs despite pyroelectric and photorefractive perturbations. The paper's strengths are its careful, honest reporting of the degraded TM mode, the combination of SFG and SPDC characterizations of the same waveguide, and the public dataset (Ref. 60). The central limitation is that the main verification rests on parameters fitted to the data it is supposed to verify, and the unfitted prediction deviates by ~8 nm in the signal wavelength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6.2, Table 2] The statement that the optimized poling period (9.654±0.002 µm) 'verifies the accuracy of our theoretical model' is circular: this period is one of two parameters optimized to minimize the deviation between simulated and measured JSI. A fitted parameter cannot serve as an independent confirmation. The unfitted Simulation 1 gives a signal at 1552.31±0.04 nm versus measured 1560.4±0.3 nm (~8 nm mismatch), so the agreement in Simulation 2 is achieved by construction. Please either (i) constrain Λ from an independent measurement (e.g., the cryogenic SFG phase-matching peaks of §5.2), (ii) show that the fitted Λ is a posteriori consistent with a contracted physical period, or (iii) explicitly reframe the claim as 'consistent with the model after fitting' rather than 'verification'.
  2. [§2.2 / §6.2] The empirical Sellmeier correction was calibrated on type-II data that mixes TE and TM contributions, and §2.2 concedes it cannot separate polarizations. Reusing that correction for a pure-TM type-0 process and concluding 'no significant correction is required for TM polarization' is unsupported, because the fitted poling period in Simulation 2 can absorb any TM-specific index error. The paper should acknowledge this degeneracy and/or use the SFG phase-matching data (which involves the same TM modes) to constrain the TM correction independently.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.1] 'We refer this power regime to the contribution' should read 'attribute'; the Klyshko plateau interpretation should be labeled as a hypothesis, especially given the large noise counts in the idler arm.
  2. [§5.2] The comparison of cryogenic CW efficiency (0.88 %/Wcm2) with heated pulsed efficiency (1.71 %/Wcm2) is acknowledged to be not apples-to-apples; please state this caveat more prominently before the comparison sentence.
  3. [Fig. 7 / Table 2] The center wavelengths are extracted from Gaussian fits to projections of a JSI acquired only over a restricted linear region. Please state how the missing gray region is treated and how the quoted ± uncertainties are propagated.
  4. [Eq. (1)] The '± 2π/Λ' sign convention for first-order QPM should be fixed; currently the reader must infer the sign from the subsequent equation.
  5. [Eq. (3)] Specify that L is in cm; otherwise the efficiency units %/Wcm2 are not transparent.
  6. [§2.2] Specify the functional form and magnitude of the empirical correction from Refs. [33,34] and state explicitly that this correction is calibrated on prior work, not independently derived.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Model verification rests on a fitted poling period: the parameter optimized to match the measured JSI is then cited as evidence of model accuracy.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 6.2, 'Joint spectral intensity', Fig. 7 and Table 2; reiterated in Conclusion]
    "We perform a second simulation with an optimization algorithm. We allow variations in the effective length and the poling period and thus minimize the deviation of the simulated JSI and our measured distribution. ... The optimized poling period is (9.654±0.002) µm, which deviates by only 0.15 % from the designed period of 9.64 µm. This deviation is thus within fabrication tolerances. ... the minimal deviation of the poling period verifies the accuracy of our theoretical model and that we can reliably achieve phase-matching for the designed wavelength combination."

    Simulation 2 optimizes the poling period and effective length to minimize the difference between the simulated and measured JSI. The central wavelengths are therefore matched by construction, not predicted. The subsequent claim that the fitted poling period's 0.15% deviation from design 'verifies the accuracy of our theoretical model' treats a fit residual as independent confirmation. A parameter adjusted to reproduce the data cannot serve as evidence that the model predicted the data. The abstract's claim that 'spectral properties match our theoretical model' relies on this post-fit agreement (Table 2, Simulation 2), while the genuinely predictive Simulation 1 is off by ~8 nm in signal and ~3 nm in idler, an offset attributed to unspecified index or fabrication uncertainties. Thus the cen

full rationale

The paper contains a genuine predictive element (Simulation 1 with design parameters), but its headline verification claim is supported primarily by Simulation 2, which fits the poling period and effective length to the measured joint spectral intensity. The fitted poling period being close to design is then presented as confirming the theoretical model. This is a partially circular step: the parameter used as evidence was itself optimized against the data being explained. A truly independent test would require fixing the poling period to the design value (as in Simulation 1) and achieving the measured wavelengths without adjustment, or independently measuring the poling period. Simulation 1 does not match the data to within the quoted uncertainties, so the abstract's 'match our theoretical model' overstates what is demonstrated. The reuse of the authors' earlier type-II empirical correction for a TM-only process is a stated limitation rather than a circular reduction, but it further weakens the independence of the model. Overall, the central claim is partially circular because the verification reduces to a fitted parameter's agreement with design, meriting a score of 5.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's design-and-verify chain rests on three fitted inputs: the empirical cryogenic index correction (upstream, from the authors' own type-II data), and two parameters (L_eff and poling period) optimized to the measured JSI. No new entities are postulated. The experimental observations themselves do not depend on these fits.

free parameters (3)
  • Cryogenic Sellmeier empirical correction (from Refs [33,34]) = Not stated in this paper; calibrated in prior type-II cryo experiments
    The central model-match claim inherits this fit from the authors' own earlier measurements (Sec 2.2). Its value, uncertainty, and TM-transferability are not quantified here.
  • Effective interaction length L_eff = (3.8 ± 0.3) mm (16.6% of designed 22.9 mm)
    Optimized in Simulation 2 (Sec 6.2) to match the measured JSI broadening. The factor-of-six reduction is attributed to charge accumulation but is not independently measured.
  • Poling period (Simulation 2) = (9.654 ± 0.002) µm vs 9.64 µm design
    Optimized in Simulation 2 to overlap the simulated and measured JSI centers (Sec 6.2). Its closeness to the design value is then presented as verification of the model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Sellmeier dispersion equations for congruent LiNbO3 (Refs [53,54]) extrapolate validly to cryogenic temperatures
    Invoked in Sec 2.2 to design the poling period and in Sec 6.2 for the JSI simulation; the extrapolation is corrected by an empirical term from the authors' prior work, and its validity for TM-only type-0 processes is the paper's weakest assumption.
  • domain assumption Thermal contraction of the crystal is negligible below 60 K
    Sec 2.2: 'Empirical data for the thermal contraction is available for temperatures down to 60 K. We assume the length remains constant for lower temperatures.' Operation is at 6.6 K.
  • standard math Quasi-phase-matching phase-mismatch equation (Eq. 1) and poling-period design relation (Eq. 2)
    Standard periodically poled nonlinear optics; used throughout Secs 2.1 and 6.2.
  • domain assumption Finite-element mode solver (RSoft FemSIM) accurately computes effective indices and the 23.0% TM00 mode overlap
    Sec 2.1, Fig. 1: the design poling period and the claimed overlap of the interacting modes come from this simulation.
  • domain assumption Excess idler counts originate from a separate TE-pumped nonlinear process with an undetectable signal photon
    Sec 6.1: the 10x idler/signal count ratio and the rise in idler counts under TE pumping are attributed to an unidentified phase-matched process; the process is not spectrally identified.
  • domain assumption Pyroelectric surface charge and frozen photorefractive charge explain the TM-mode degradation and reduced effective length
    Secs 2.2, 5.3, 6.2: the mechanism is inferred from the observed substrate-mode leakage, transmission drop, and the fitted 3.8 mm effective length; no direct charge or field measurement is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Widely non-degenerate nonlinear frequency conversion in cryogenic titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PSF7VY4A

@misc{pith2026250902392,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Widely non-degenerate nonlinear frequency conversion in cryogenic titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PSF7VY4A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02392}
}
read the original abstract

The titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguide platform is well-established for reliable prototyping and packaging of many quantum photonic components at room temperature. Nevertheless, compatibility with certain quantum light sources and superconducting detectors requires operation under cryogenic conditions. We characterize alterations in phase-matching and mode guiding of a non-degenerate spontaneous parametric down-conversion process emitting around 1556 nm and 950 nm, under cryogenic conditions. Despite the effects of pyroelectricity and photorefraction, the spectral properties match our theoretical model. Nevertheless, these effects cause small but significant variations within and between cooling cycles. These measurements provide a first benchmark against which other nonlinear photonic integration platforms, such as thin-film lithium niobate, can be compared.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02392 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simulated spatial modes which are guided in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic overview of the experimental setups to characterize the frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase-matched SFG processes in the heated waveguide operated at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial mode images of the cryogenic waveguide for the two CW lasers and both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Variations in the phase-matching of the cryogenic waveguide. The power of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measured number of counts from the cryogenic SPDC source for increasing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Joint spectral intensity of the cryogenic SPDC source. (a) Measured total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lithium niobate: summary of physical properties and crystal structure,

    R. S. Weis and T. K. Gaylord, “Lithium niobate: summary of physical properties and crystal structure,” Appl. Phys. A 37, 191–203 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Integrated optical devices in lithium niobate,

    W. Sohler, H. Hu, R. Ricken,et al., “Integrated optical devices in lithium niobate,” Opt. Photon. News19, 24–31 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Quantum photonics at telecom wavelengths based on lithium niobate waveguides,

    O. Alibart, V. D’Auria, M. De Micheli,et al., “Quantum photonics at telecom wavelengths based on lithium niobate waveguides,” J. Opt.18, 104001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,

    G. Chen, N. Li, J. D. Ng,et al., “Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,” Adv. Photonics 4, 034003–034003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Efficient second-harmonic generation in ti: Linbo3 channel waveguide resonators,

    R. Regener and W. Sohler, “Efficient second-harmonic generation in ti: Linbo3 channel waveguide resonators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B5, 267–277 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Bright narrowband source of photon pairs at optical telecommunication wavelengths using a type-ii periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide,

    G. Fujii, N. Namekata, M. Motoya,et al., “Bright narrowband source of photon pairs at optical telecommunication wavelengths using a type-ii periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide,” Opt. Express15, 12769–12776 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, Inc., 2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,

    C. Wang, C. Langrock, A. Marandi,et al., “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica5, 1438–1441 (2018)

    2018

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    High-power waveguide resonator second harmonic device with external conversion efficiency up to 75%,

    M. Stefszky, R. Ricken, C. Eigner,et al., “High-power waveguide resonator second harmonic device with external conversion efficiency up to 75%,” J. Opt.20, 065501 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    First-order quasi-phase matched linbo3 waveguide periodically poled by applying an external field for efficient blue second-harmonic generation,

    M. Yamada, N. Nada, M. Saitoh, and K. Watanabe, “First-order quasi-phase matched linbo3 waveguide periodically poled by applying an external field for efficient blue second-harmonic generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett.62, 435–436 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    PPLN waveguide for quantum communication,

    S. Tanzilli, W. Tittel, H. De Riedmatten,et al., “PPLN waveguide for quantum communication,” Eur. Phys. J. D18, 155–160 (2002)

    2002

  4. [12]

    Research progress on periodically poled lithium niobate for nonlinear frequency conversion,

    Y. Niu, X. Yan, J. Chen,et al., “Research progress on periodically poled lithium niobate for nonlinear frequency conversion,” Infrared physics & technology125, 104243 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Titanium-diffused lithium niobate waveguide devices,

    R. Alferness, “Titanium-diffused lithium niobate waveguide devices,” inGuided-wave optoelectronics,(Springer, 1988), pp. 145–210

    1988

  6. [14]

    A polarization entangled photon-pair source based on a type-ii ppln waveguide emitting at a telecom wavelength,

    A. Martin, A. Issautier, H. Herrmann,et al., “A polarization entangled photon-pair source based on a type-ii ppln waveguide emitting at a telecom wavelength,” New J. Phys.12, 103005 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    An efficient integrated two-color source for heralded single photons,

    S. Krapick, H. Herrmann, V. Quiring,et al., “An efficient integrated two-color source for heralded single photons,” New J. Phys.15, 33010 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    High-efficiency plug-and-play source of heralded single photons,

    N. Montaut, L. Sansoni, E. Meyer-Scott,et al., “High-efficiency plug-and-play source of heralded single photons,” Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 24021 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Atwo-channel, spectrallydegeneratepolarizationentangledsourceonchip,

    L.Sansoni, K.H.Luo, C.Eigner, et al., “Atwo-channel, spectrallydegeneratepolarizationentangledsourceonchip,” npj Quantum Inf.3, 1–5 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric down-conversion source,

    R. Pollmann, F. Roeder, V. Quiring,et al., “Integrated, bright broadband, two-colour parametric down-conversion source,” Opt. Express32, 23945–23955 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Characteristics of ti-diffused lithium niobate optical directional couplers,

    R. Alferness, R. Schmidt, and E. Turner, “Characteristics of ti-diffused lithium niobate optical directional couplers,” Appl. Opt.18, 4012–4016 (1979)

    1979

  12. [20]

    Electro-optic ti: Ppln waveguide as efficient optical wavelength filter and polarization mode converter,

    C. Huang, C. Lin, Y. Chen, and Y. Huang, “Electro-optic ti: Ppln waveguide as efficient optical wavelength filter and polarization mode converter,” Opt. express15, 2548–2554 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Nonlinear integrated quantum electro-optic circuits,

    K.-H. Luo, S. Brauner, C. Eigner,et al., “Nonlinear integrated quantum electro-optic circuits,” Sci. Adv.5, eaat1451 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Cryogenic electro-optic modulation in titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,

    F. Thiele, F. vom Bruch, J. Brockmeier,et al., “Cryogenic electro-optic modulation in titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,” J. Physics: Photonics4, 034004 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Integrated transition edge sensors on titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,

    J. P. Höpker, T. Gerrits, A. Lita,et al., “Integrated transition edge sensors on titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,” APL Photonics4, 56103 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Integratedsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectorsontitanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,

    J.P.Höpker,V.B.Verma,M.Protte, et al.,“Integratedsuperconductingnanowiresingle-photondetectorsontitanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,” J. Physics: Photonics3, 034022 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,

    D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu,et al., “Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,” Adv. Opt. Photonics13, 242–352 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Efficient single-mode fiber to titanium diffused lithium niobate waveguide coupling for𝜆 = 1.32µm,

    R. Alferness, V. Ramaswamy, S. Korotky,et al., “Efficient single-mode fiber to titanium diffused lithium niobate waveguide coupling for𝜆 = 1.32µm,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.18, 1807–1813 (1982)

    1982

  19. [27]

    High coupling efficiency waveguide grating couplers on lithium niobate,

    X. Zhou, Y. Xue, F. Ye,et al., “High coupling efficiency waveguide grating couplers on lithium niobate,” Opt. Lett. 48, 3267–3270 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Inverse designed grating coupler with low loss and high bandwidth on lnoi platform,

    X. He, D. Sun, J. Chen, and Y. Shi, “Inverse designed grating coupler with low loss and high bandwidth on lnoi platform,” IEEE Photonics J.16, 1–5 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Waveguide grating couplers with bandwidth beyond 200 nm,

    X. Zhou, Y. Xue, H. Feng,et al., “Waveguide grating couplers with bandwidth beyond 200 nm,” Nanophotonics14, 571–579 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors,

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V. Polyakov, “Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.82, 071101 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,

    A. W. Elshaari, W. Pernice, K. Srinivasan,et al., “Hybrid integrated quantum photonic circuits,” Nat. Photonics pp. 1–14 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Cryogenic second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,

    M. Bartnick, M. Santandrea, J. P. Höpker,et al., “Cryogenic second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 024028 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Cryogenic integrated spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    N. A. Lange, J. P. Höpker, R. Ricken,et al., “Cryogenic integrated spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Optica 9, 108–111 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Degenerate photons from a cryogenic spontaneous parametric down-conversion source,

    N. A. Lange, T. Schapeler, J. P. Höpker,et al., “Degenerate photons from a cryogenic spontaneous parametric down-conversion source,” Phys. Rev. A108, 023701 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Cryogenic electro-optic polarisation conversion in titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,

    F. Thiele, F. vom Bruch, V. Quiring,et al., “Cryogenic electro-optic polarisation conversion in titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,” Opt. Express28, 28961–28968 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Efficient cryogenic nonlinear conversion processes in periodically-poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,

    Y. Cheng, X. Li, L. Feng,et al., “Efficient cryogenic nonlinear conversion processes in periodically-poled thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,” Laser & Photonics Rev.19, 2401491 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Cryogenic lithium-niobate-on-insulator optical filter,

    Y. Cheng, L. Feng, J. He,et al., “Cryogenic lithium-niobate-on-insulator optical filter,” Opt. Lett.49, 1969–1972 (2024)

    1969

  30. [38]

    Single-photon detection and cryogenic reconfigurability in lithium niobate nanophotonic circuits,

    E. Lomonte, M. A. Wolff, F. Beutel,et al., “Single-photon detection and cryogenic reconfigurability in lithium niobate nanophotonic circuits,” Nat. communications12, 6847 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Entanglement generation using cryogenic integrated four-wave mixing,

    L.-T. Feng, Y.-J. Cheng, X.-Z. Qi,et al., “Entanglement generation using cryogenic integrated four-wave mixing,” Optica 10, 702–707 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Packaged cryogenic photon pair source using an effective packaging methodology for cryogenic integrated optics,

    D. Witt, L. Chrostowski, and J. Young, “Packaged cryogenic photon pair source using an effective packaging methodology for cryogenic integrated optics,” arXiv:2401.02068 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    High-performance integrated graphene electro-optic modulator at cryogenic temperature,

    B. S. Lee, B. Kim, A. P. Freitas,et al., “High-performance integrated graphene electro-optic modulator at cryogenic temperature,” Nanophotonics10, 99–104 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Optical damage inhibition and thresholding effects in lithium niobate above room temperature,

    J. Rams, A. A. de Velasco, M. Carrascosa,et al., “Optical damage inhibition and thresholding effects in lithium niobate above room temperature,” Opt. Commun.178, 211–216 (2000)

    2000

  35. [43]

    All-optical technique to measure the pyroelectric coefficient in electro-optic crystals,

    J. Parravicini, J. Safioui, V. Degiorgio,et al., “All-optical technique to measure the pyroelectric coefficient in electro-optic crystals,” J. Appl. Phys.109, 033106 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Photorefractive damage resistance in ti: Ppln waveguides with ridge geometry,

    S. Pal, B. K. Das, and W. Sohler, “Photorefractive damage resistance in ti: Ppln waveguides with ridge geometry,” Appl. Phys. B120, 737–749 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Pyroelectric influence on lithium niobate during the thermal transition for cryogenic integrated photonics,

    F. Thiele, T. Hummel, N. A. Lange,et al., “Pyroelectric influence on lithium niobate during the thermal transition for cryogenic integrated photonics,” Mater. for Quantum Technol.4, 015402 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Optically induced change of refractive indices in linbo3 and litao3,

    F. Chen, “Optically induced change of refractive indices in linbo3 and litao3,” J. applied physics40, 3389–3396 (1969)

    1969

  39. [47]

    Photorefractive damage thresholds in ti: Linbo3 channel waveguides,

    J. C. Chon, W. Feng, and A. R. Mickelson, “Photorefractive damage thresholds in ti: Linbo3 channel waveguides,” Appl. optics32, 7572–7580 (1993)

    1993

  40. [48]

    Experimental quantum teleportation,

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle,et al., “Experimental quantum teleportation,” Nature390, 575–579 (1997)

    1997

  41. [49]

    Coalescence of single photons emitted by disparate single-photon sources: The example of inas quantum dots and parametric down-conversion sources,

    S. V. Polyakov, A. Muller, E. B. Flagg,et al., “Coalescence of single photons emitted by disparate single-photon sources: The example of inas quantum dots and parametric down-conversion sources,” Phys. review letters107, 157402 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    Interfacingaquantumdotwithaspontaneousparametricdown-conversion source,

    T.Huber,M.Prilmüller,M.Sehner, et al.,“Interfacingaquantumdotwithaspontaneousparametricdown-conversion source,” Quantum Sci. Technol.2, 034016 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    C. Couteau, “Spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Contemp. Phys.59, 291–304 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Toolbox for the design of LiNbO3-based passive and active integrated quantum circuits,

    P. R. Sharapova, K. H. Luo, H. Herrmann,et al., “Toolbox for the design of LiNbO3-based passive and active integrated quantum circuits,” New J. Phys.19, 123009 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    A temperature-dependent dispersion equation for congruently grown lithium niobate,

    G. J. Edwards and M. Lawrence, “A temperature-dependent dispersion equation for congruently grown lithium niobate,” Opt Quant Electron16, 373–375 (1984)

    1984

  46. [54]

    Temperature-dependent sellmeier equation for the index of refraction, ne, in congruent lithium niobate,

    D. H. Jundt, “Temperature-dependent sellmeier equation for the index of refraction, ne, in congruent lithium niobate,” Opt. Lett.22, 1553–1555 (1997)

    1997

  47. [55]

    Wong,Properties of Lithium Niobate (INSPEC, 2002)

    K. Wong,Properties of Lithium Niobate (INSPEC, 2002)

    2002

  48. [56]

    Understanding light intensity thresholds for catastrophic optical damage in linbo3,

    M. Carrascosa, J. Villarroel, J. Carnicero,et al., “Understanding light intensity thresholds for catastrophic optical damage in linbo3,” Opt. Express16, 115–120 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Pyroelectricity: From ancient curiosity to modern imaging tool,

    S. B. Lang, “Pyroelectricity: From ancient curiosity to modern imaging tool,” Phys. Today58, 31–36 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    How to measure the pyroelectric coefficient?

    S. Jachalke, E. Mehner, H. Stöcker,et al., “How to measure the pyroelectric coefficient?” Appl. Phys. Rev.4, 21303 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Low-temperature pyroelectric phenomena in lithium niobate single crystals,

    S. L. Bravina, A. N. Morozovska, N. V. Morozovsky, and Y. A. Skryshevsky, “Low-temperature pyroelectric phenomena in lithium niobate single crystals,” Ferroelectrics298, 31–42 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Dataset: Widely non-degenerate nonlinear frequency conversion in cryogenic titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,

    N. A. Lange, S. Lengeling, P. Mues,et al., “Dataset: Widely non-degenerate nonlinear frequency conversion in cryogenic titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides,” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16911614 (2025)

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.