Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 122 references

Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP) II: Super-Jupiters and Lithium-rich Host Stars

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TOI-4138's host star carries a lithium excess 4.5σ above its peers, which the paper interprets as the signature of a swallowed planet, while four newly confirmed super-Jupiters stretch the survey's sample of massive close-in giants.

desk verdict Four super-Jupiters are solidly confirmed and worth having, but the TOI-4138 lithium excess claim rests on an uncalibrated cross-instrument EW comparison that the stress-test correctly flags. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02666 v1 pith:NPJQRUDA submitted 2025-09-02 astro-ph.EP

Jack Schulte , Joseph E. Rodriguez , David W. Latham , Joshua V. Shields , Noah Vowell , Melinda Soares-Furtado , Brooke Kotten , Xian-Yu Wang
show 25 more authors
Karen A. Collins Allyson Bieryla Samuel N. Quinn Paul Benni Catherine A. Clark Matthew W. Craig Mara L. DeRung Jason D. Eastman Zahra Essack Phil Evans Rebecca Gore Steve B. Howell John F. Kielkopf Colin Littlefield Andrew W. Mann Giuseppe Marino Don J. Radford Chris Stockdale Ivan A. Strakhov Thiam-Guan Tan Michael Vezie Songhu Wang Emily Watson Samuel W. Yee Carl Ziegler
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords hotJupiterssuper-Jupiterslithium-richstarsplanetaryengulfmentsubgiantexoplanetmigrationtransitphotometryradialvelocities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that TOI-4138, an F-type subgiant hosting the inflated hot Jupiter TOI-4138 b, shows a large photospheric lithium excess: a measured equivalent width of 120 ± 13 mÅ for the lithium doublet at 6707.8 Å, which is a 4.47-sigma outlier against a control sample of 1,381 similar stars. Because the star is old enough that primordial lithium should long ago have been destroyed, and because checks for youth come up negative, the paper concludes that the lithium most plausibly came from the engulfment of a planetary companion. The paper also reports the discovery and characterization of four super-Jupiters, each more than five times Jupiter's mass, one of which, TOI-5261 b, is an eccentric 11.49-Jupiter-mass planet orbiting a solar analog. These systems fill a sparse region of the giant-planet mass-radius diagram and extend a self-consistent sample of hot Jupiters built to test competing migration pathways.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing measurement is the equivalent width of the Li I 6707.8 Å doublet, extracted from co-added high-resolution spectra (resolving power about 44,000) with a fixed-width five-Gaussian fit that separates the lithium line from blending Fe, CN, V, and Ce features. The statistical significance is then assessed with a modified Z-score against a control sample selected from a large spectroscopic catalog to match each star's color and absolute magnitude within 0.075 magnitudes, after filtering on data-quality flags. The planetary parameters come from a global fitting code that simultaneously models the spectral energy distribution, radial velocities, and transits, with eccentricity and tidal circularization timescales used to interpret migration history.

What would settle it

Re-measure TOI-4138's lithium line with an independent high-resolution spectrum, derive the equivalent width using the same five-Gaussian recipe, and rebuild the control-star distribution with identical spectral extraction and line fitting; if the target then falls within about 2 sigma of the control median, the engulfment claim is unsupported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that TOI-4138 is a compelling planetary-engulfment candidate. Its lithium I doublet equivalent width of 120 ± 13 mÅ ranks in the 99.86th percentile of a color-magnitude-matched control sample of 1,381 stars (median 33 mÅ, median absolute deviation 13.1 mÅ), giving a modified Z-score of 4.47. The star's evolutionary age—about 5.6 Gyr, with the favored solution at 5.87 Gyr—is far too old for primordial lithium to survive, and checks for youth, including comoving companions, infrared excess, fast rotation, X-ray emission, and a low pre-main-sequence probability, all come back negative. The paper therefore attributes the lithium to ingestion of roughly a Jupiter-mass body, a mechanism predicted to leave a detectable lithium enhancement for up to 1.5 Gyr in this part of parameter space. In the same analysis, four new super-Jupiters are confirmed: TOI-4773 b, TOI-5261 b, TOI-5350 b, and TOI-6420 b, with masses of 5.31, 11.49, 6.59, and 8.2 Jupiter masses. TOI-5261 b's mass approaches the deuterium-burning limit and its eccentricity, 0.1585, is argued to be a relic of high-eccentricity migration.

Load-bearing premise

The engulfment conclusion rests on comparing a lithium equivalent width measured from the paper's own spectra against catalog values from a different survey without a cross-calibration step, so a small systematic offset between the two measurement scales could turn the 4.5-sigma outlier into an ordinary star.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If TOI-4138's lithium really records an engulfment, its surviving hot Jupiter becomes a benchmark for post-engulfment planetary evolution, and the system offers a place to test dynamical scenarios in which a migrating giant planet scatters or drags companions into its star.
  • The four super-Jupiters occupy a sparsely populated region of the mass-radius diagram above five Jupiter masses, where core-accretion theory predicts fewer outcomes, so their measured radii and densities add constraints to giant-planet structure and inflation.
  • TOI-5261 b, at 11.49 Jupiter masses with significant eccentricity, sits near the deuterium-burning boundary and may help distinguish high-eccentricity migration from disk migration for massive close-in planets.
  • Each system increases the size of the survey's homogeneous, magnitude-limited hot-Jupiter sample, bringing closer a statistical test of how often each migration pathway operates.
  • The roughly 100 m/s offset between the two observing seasons of TOI-4138 radial velocities hints at a long-period companion whose confirmation would connect the engulfment and migration narrative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper compares its measured lithium equivalent width directly with catalog values from a different spectroscopic survey without a cross-calibration step, an independent re-measurement of TOI-4138 and a re-derivation of the control distribution using identical extraction and line-fitting would settle whether the 4.47-sigma excess survives.
  • If engulfment is the right story, other evolved hot-Jupiter hosts with lithium excesses should exist in rough proportion to how many massive planets get swallowed, so a targeted search for lithium-rich subgiants among planet hosts could quantify the engulfment rate.
  • The absence of a significant lithium excess in TOI-4773, TOI-5350, and TOI-6420, despite all being planet hosts, suggests the lithium signature depends sharply on stellar mass and timing, and comparing those non-detections with TOI-4138 could map where engulfment lithium remains observable.
  • TOI-5261 b's near-deuterium-burning mass invites a follow-up test of whether its atmosphere or spin-orbit alignment carries remnants of its formation, a prediction that specific observations could check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript, the second paper in the MEEP survey, reanalyzes the previously known hot Jupiter TOI-4138 b and presents the confirmation and characterization of four new transiting super-Jupiters: TOI-4773 b, TOI-5261 b, TOI-5350 b, and TOI-6420 b. The planet parameters come from global EXOFASTv2 fits combining TESS and ground-based photometry, radial velocities from TRES, CHIRON, and NEID, speckle imaging, and spectral energy distributions, with a common set of priors. The headline result is a strong Li I 6707.8 Å feature in the subgiant TOI-4138 (EW = 120 ± 13 mÅ), which the authors compare with a GALAH DR4 control sample of 1,381 stars and find to be a 4.47-sigma modified-Z outlier, interpreting it as evidence for planetary engulfment. The other three Li detections are weaker and are not claimed as individually significant. TOI-5261 b is highlighted as an 11.49 M_J, e = 0.1585 super-Jupiter orbiting a solar analog, close to the deuterium-burning limit.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a solid contribution: the four super-Jupiters occupy a sparse region of the giant-planet mass-radius diagram and are characterized with a homogeneous methodology, and the paper ships public analysis code and machine-readable radial velocities, which are useful strengths. TOI-5261 b in particular is a noteworthy benchmark object. The lithium analysis has the potential to strengthen the observational case for planetary engulfment, but the core outlier claim currently rests on an unvalidated cross-instrument equivalent-width comparison, and the TOI-5261 astrometry table contains an unexplained inconsistency. If the cross-calibration concern is resolved and the astrometry issue is corrected, the paper would be a valuable addition to the MEEP sample.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Table 7, Fig. 4] The lithium outlier claim compares a TRES-measured EW (R ≈ 44,000; fixed-width five-Gaussian deblending) directly with GALAH DR4 catalog EWs obtained with a different spectrograph and pipeline, and no cross-calibration or overlap sample is presented. Because the control distribution is narrow (median 33 mÅ, MAD 13.1 mÅ), a systematic 20–30 mÅ scale offset would reduce the modified Z-score from 4.47 to roughly 3.4–2.9, materially weakening the outlier claim that underlies the engulfment interpretation. The authors should demonstrate that the two EW scales agree, for example by measuring Li EWs for GALAH stars from spectra reduced in the same way or by quantifying a scale offset from common standard stars, and should propagate the associated systematic uncertainty into the significance.
  2. [Table 5 and Table 6] Table 5 lists TOI-5261's Gaia DR3 parallax as -0.2016 ± 0.3236 mas, while §3.1 and Table 6 adopt a Gaussian prior of 2.655 ± 0.061 mas. The adopted prior is over 8σ discrepant from the catalog value, and the catalog value as printed is unphysical, so either the table entry or the prior needs correction and the source of the prior should be documented. Because this prior effectively sets the distance and stellar radius for TOI-5261, it directly affects the reported planetary radius and density, and the sensitivity of those quantities to the parallax treatment should be quantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption reports the TOI-4138 Li EW as 121 ± 12 mÅ, while the text, Table 7, and Fig. 2 report 120 ± 13 mÅ; the values should be made consistent.
  2. [§2.4.2] The text refers to 'TOI-4473' where TOI-4773 is meant.
  3. [Table 5] Several entries have typographical spacing errors, e.g., '1 .9493±0.0163' and '1 .893±0.014'; these should be corrected.
  4. [Table 6 and §4.1] Table 6 lists TOI-6420's age as 4.4+2.8−20 Gyr, while §4.1 cites 4.2+2.6−1.9 Gyr; the values should be reconciled.
  5. [§4.1] The sentence after the Comove discussion begins with the stray phrase 'TOI-4138 Additionally,' which appears to be a leftover fragment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the planet parameters come from independent photometric, RV, and SED data, and the lithium-outlier claim is a direct measurement compared against an external GALAH control sample; self-citations are methodological or external-model support, not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central results are not circular by construction. The four super-Jupiter confirmations and the TOI-4138b reanalysis rest on EXOFASTv2 global fits to TESS and ground-based photometry, TRES/CHIRON/NEID/HARPS-N radial velocities, speckle imaging, and archival SED photometry (Section 3.1, Tables 1-6). None of the planet parameters is fitted to the quantity it is later used to predict. The lithium analysis in Section 3.2 measures the target Li I 6707.8 Å equivalent width directly from 32 co-added TRES spectra via a five-Gaussian deblend, then compares that measured value to a control distribution of 1381 GALAH DR4 stars selected only by CMD position and data-quality flags. The modified Z-score of 4.47 is a descriptive statistic of an independently measured target value against an external catalog distribution; TOI-4138 is not part of the GALAH control sample and no GALAH value is used to calibrate the TRES EW. The engulfment interpretation cites Soares-Furtado et al. (2021) and Behmard et al. (2023) as external models with stated assumptions that do not include TOI-4138, so those citations are real evidence rather than circular self-support. Methodological citations to Schulte et al. (2024), Wang et al. (2024), and Shields et al. (2025) concern data-reduction or spectral-synthesis procedures, not the load-bearing claims. The potential TRES-to-GALAH equivalent-width scale mismatch is a systematic calibration or correctness risk that could weaken the outlier significance, but it is not a by-construction equivalence or a fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction. Likewise, the apparently erroneous TOI-5261 parallax in Table 5 versus the adopted prior in Table 6 is an internal inconsistency, not a circular step. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-chain, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Most of the paper's outputs are standard exoplanet characterization fits; the lithium enhancement claim rests on the cross-survey EW comparison and the adopted stellar age, both of which carry unverified assumptions.

free parameters (3)
  • Control sample CMD selection radius = 0.075 mag
    Hand-chosen radius in Gaia BP-RP color vs absolute G magnitude space for selecting GALAH comparison stars. This choice directly affects the control sample composition and the computed Li EW percentile and Z-score.
  • Bimodal mass split for TOI-4138 = 1.27 M_sun
    Local minimum between two posterior peaks in stellar mass; used to separate the 19.5% and 80.5% probability solutions. The favored low-mass solution determines the adopted age used in the Li interpretation.
  • TESS dilution prior width = 0.10 x D
    Standard deviation of the Gaussian prior on the TESS dilution factor, set to 10% of the contamination-derived D; kept in the TOI-4773 fit because its median dilution was -0.037 +/- 0.025.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption MIST stellar evolution models accurately map SED, parallax, and spectroscopic constraints to stellar mass, radius, and age.
    EXOFASTv2 fits rely on MIST isochrones; the adopted old age for TOI-4138 comes from this fit.
  • domain assumption GALAH DR4 Li EW values are directly comparable to EWs measured from TRES spectra with a different resolution and analysis pipeline.
    The 4.47-sigma significance is computed by comparing the TRES measurement to GALAH catalog values; no cross-calibration is described.
  • domain assumption The five-Gaussian model (Li I, CN, Fe I, V/Ce) with fixed line widths correctly isolates the Li I 6707.8 Å feature in co-added TRES spectra.
    If the line is partly a blend, the measured EW could be biased; the model is fit with scipy curve_fit.
  • domain assumption Theoretical predictions by Soares-Furtado et al. (2021) and Behmard et al. (2023) that a roughly 1 M_J engulfment produces a detectable, about 1.5 Gyr Li enhancement in roughly 1.1-1.2 M_sun stars are correct.
    The engulfment interpretation relies on these external models; the paper cites them without independent verification.
  • domain assumption The selected GALAH quality flags (RUWE < 1.4, flag_red = 0, flag_sp = 0, flag_fe_h = 0, SNR > 30, flag_a_li < 4) remove binaries and unreliable measurements without biasing the Li EW distribution.
    The control sample used to judge significance is defined by these cuts.
invented entities (1)
  • None
    purpose: No new particles, forces, or physical mechanisms are introduced.
    The possible long-period companion around TOI-4138 is an interpretation of an RV offset, not a newly postulated entity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP) II: Super-Jupiters and Lithium-rich Host Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NPJQRUDA

@misc{pith2026250902666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP) II: Super-Jupiters and Lithium-rich Host Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NPJQRUDA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02666}
}
abstract

Although hot Jupiters were the first exoplanets discovered orbiting main sequence stars, the dominant mechanisms through which they form and evolve are not known. To address the questions surrounding their origins, the Migration and Evolution of giant ExoPlanets (MEEP) survey aims to create a complete, magnitude-limited ($G<$12.5) sample of hot Jupiters that can be used to constrain the frequency of different migration pathways. NASA's Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite provides the unique combination of sky-coverage and photometric precision to achieve this goal, which will likely be a key result of the mission. In this second installment of the MEEP survey, we reanalyze one benchmark hot Jupiter system, TOI-4138, and discover four additional super-Jupiters which are each more than five times as massive as Jupiter: TOI-4773 b, TOI-5261 b, TOI-5350 b, and TOI-6420 b. One of these planets, TOI-5261 b, is 11.49 times the mass of Jupiter, nearly massive enough to ignite deuterium fusion, and has an eccentric ($e = 0.1585$) orbit. TOI-4138, TOI-4773, TOI-5350, and TOI-6420 each have lithium absorption features in their spectra. TOI-4138 is an F-type subgiant with a lithium equivalent width of $120. \pm 13$ m\r{A}, which is $\sim 4.5\sigma$ larger than the median lithium equivalent width of a control sample of 1381 similar stars, making TOI-4138 a compelling candidate for planetary engulfment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. TOI-4138’s RV observations from the TRES spectrograph. The first season was from UTC 12 June 2023 to UTC 01 July 2023, while the second season was from UTC 29 April 2024 to UTC 12 June 2024. The center point of the two seasons are offset by 108 m s−1 . This offset could indicate the presence of an additional, long-period companion in the system. projected radial velocity of TOI-4773 using SPC (Buchhave et al. 2012).… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 32 co-added TRES spectra of TOI-4138, illustrating the lithium doublet at 6707.814 Å. Five Gaussians were fit to account for possible blending features of Fe, CN, V, and Ce in addition to the Li feature. The only features that contribute significantly to TOI-4138’s spectrum are Fe I and Li I. The equivalent width of the Li I feature was measured to be 120. ± 13 mÅ. showing the Li EW of TOI-4138 as it compares to the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Color-magnitude diagram of the GALAH DR4 comparison sample of stars used to examine the significance of TOI-4138’s Li anomaly. Three MIST evolutionary tracks are shown with metallicities equal to the median metallicity of TOI-4138. The solid lines represent the main sequence of each evolutionary track, while the dashed lines represent the subgiant branch. TOI-4138’s median stellar mass is 1.188+0.11 −0.058 M⊙. 0 50 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram of lithium equivalent widths from our GALAH DR4 example. The solid curve is a kernel density estimation of the values represented in the histogram. The red dashed line represents the measured lithium equivalent width for TOI-4138 of 121 ± 12 mÅ. The median eq…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gaussian kernel density estimation of TOI-4138’s bimodal mass and age posterior distributions. In both cases, the probability density has been normalized to the integral of the curve. The cyan dashed lines represent the reported median mass and age from [PITH_FULL_IMA…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mass vs. radius diagram of the existing sample of confirmed hot and warm Jupiters, colored in grey (retrieved through the NASA Exoplanet Archive on 2025 May 8), compared to the systems analyzed in the way described in this article (Rodriguez et al. 2021; Ikwut-Ukwa et …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Photometric and radial velocity observations of the TOI-4138 system. Upper left: Phase-folded, unbinned, transits of TOI-4138 b shown in comparison to the best-fit time of conjunction with an arbitrary normalized flux offset. Multiple TESS sectors in the same cadence a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Eccentricity and semi-major axis distribution of the planets discovered in this work, compared to confirmed warm and hot giant planets in the literature and several avenues and outcomes of giant planet migration (adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Albrecht S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...18A 757, 18

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/18 2012

  2. [2]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    Asplund M., Amarsi A. M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  4. [4]

    H., Laughlin G

    Batygin K., Bodenheimer P. H., Laughlin G. P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829..114B 829, 114

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/114 2016

  5. [5]

    C., Vanderburg A., Adams F

    Becker J. C., Vanderburg A., Adams F. C., Rappaport S. A., Schwengeler H. M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...812L..18B 812, L18

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/l18 2015

  6. [6]

    Behmard A., Sevilla J., Fuller J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.5465B 518, 5465

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3435 2023

  7. [7]

    Bodenheimer P., 1965, @doi [ ] 10.1086/148310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965ApJ...142..451B 142, 451

    work page doi:10.1086/148310 1965

  8. [8]

    J., Fortney J

    Bodenheimer P., D'Angelo G., Lissauer J. J., Fortney J. J., Saumon D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770..120B 770, 120

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/120 2013

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A.107B 602, A107

    Bonomo A. S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...602A.107B 602, A107

    2017 doi

  2. [11]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    Brown T. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    2013 doi

  3. [12]

    L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...89B 821, 89

    Bryan M. L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...89B 821, 89

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1118B 720, 1118

    Buchhave L. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1118B 720, 1118

    2010 doi

  5. [14]

    A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature11121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.486..375B 486, 375

    Buchhave L. A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature11121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.486..375B 486, 375

    2012 doi

  6. [15]

    arXiv:2409.19858

    Buder S., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.19858 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240919858B p. arXiv:2409.19858

    2024 doi arXiv

  7. [16]

    I., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aafa1e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870L..17C 870, L17

    Ca \ n as C. I., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aafa1e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870L..17C 870, L17

    2019 doi

  8. [17]

    A., et al., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..201C 4, 201

    Caldwell D. A., et al., 2020, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abc9b3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..201C 4, 201

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    Cameron A. G. W., Fowler W. A., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971ApJ...164..111C 164, 111

    1971 doi

  10. [19]

    Q., Nissen P

    Chen Y. Q., Nissen P. E., Benoni T., Zhao G., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010371 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...371..943C 371, 943

    2001 doi

  11. [20]

    R., Beichman C

    Ciardi D. R., Beichman C. A., Horch E. P., Howell S. B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...16C 805, 16

    2015 doi

  12. [21]

    A., Kielkopf J

    Collins K. A., Kielkopf J. F., Stassun K. G., Hessman F. V., 2017, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77 , 153, 77

    2017 doi

  13. [22]

    N., Latham D

    Collins K., Quinn S. N., Latham D. W., Christiansen J., Ciardi D., Dragomir D., Crossfield I., Seager S., 2018, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#231. p. 439.08

    2018

  14. [23]

    Craig M., et al., 2022, astropy/ccdproc: 2.3.1 -- fixes astropy 5.1 compatibility , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.6533213

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    Craig M., et al., 2024, feder-observatory/stellarphot: 1.0.2, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.14142853 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14142853

    2024 doi

  16. [25]

    M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003yCat.2246....0C p

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003yCat.2246....0C p. II/246

    2003

  17. [26]

    M., et al., 2012, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products , Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2012, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products , Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products

    2012

  18. [27]

    I., Johnson J

    Dawson R. I., Johnson J. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ARA&A..56..175D 56, 175

    2018 doi

  19. [28]

    De K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-05842-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.617...55D 617, 55

    2023 doi

  20. [29]

    F., Semel M., Carter B

    Donati J. F., Semel M., Carter B. D., Rees D. E., Collier Cameron A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/291.4.658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.291..658D 291, 658

    1997 doi

  21. [30]

    S., Agol E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/669497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125...83E 125, 83

    Eastman J., Gaudi B. S., Agol E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/669497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125...83E 125, 83

    2013 doi

  22. [31]

    D., et al., 2019, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1907.09480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190709480E p

    Eastman J. D., et al., 2019, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1907.09480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190709480E p. arXiv:1907.09480

    2019 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    F u r\'esz G., 2008, PhD thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    2008

  24. [33]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-022-05674-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.614..670F 614, 670

    Feinstein A. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-022-05674-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.614..670F 614, 670

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    A., Valenti J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622.1102F 622, 1102

    Fischer D. A., Valenti J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428383 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622.1102F 622, 1102

    2005 doi

  26. [35]

    B., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..505F 642, 505

    Ford E. B., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..505F 642, 505

    2006 doi

  27. [36]

    B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...66F 154, 66

    Furlan E., Howell S. B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...66F 154, 66

    2017 doi

  28. [37]

    B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...47F 898, 47

    Furlan E., Howell S. B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...47F 898, 47

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Goldreich P., Tremaine S., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...241..425G 241, 425

    1980 doi

  31. [40]

    Gonzalez G., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/285.2.403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.285..403G 285, 403

    1997 doi

  32. [41]

    F., 2005, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres

    Gray D. F., 2005, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres

    2005

  33. [42]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    Guerrero N. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    G., Nordlund A ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...486..951G 486, 951

    Gustafsson B., Edvardsson B., Eriksson K., J rgensen U. G., Nordlund A ., Plez B., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...486..951G 486, 951

    2008 doi

  35. [44]

    J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Halverson S., et al., 2016, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. p. 99086P ( @eprint arXiv 1607.05634 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2232761

    2016 arXiv

  36. [45]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..263H 162, 263

    Hord B. J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2602 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..263H 162, 263

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    B., Everett M

    Howell S. B., Everett M. E., Sherry W., Horch E., Ciardi D. R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...19H 142, 19

    2011 doi

  38. [47]

    B., Matson R

    Howell S. B., Matson R. A., Ciardi D. R., Everett M. E., Livingston J. H., Scott N. J., Horch E. P., Winn J. N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abdec6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..164H 161, 164

    2021 doi

  39. [48]

    X., 2020, TESS Lightcurves From The MIT Quick-Look Pipeline ("QLP"), @doi 10.17909/T9-R086-E880 , http://archive.stsci.edu/doi/resolve/resolve.html?doi=10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    Huang C. X., 2020, TESS Lightcurves From The MIT Quick-Look Pipeline ("QLP"), @doi 10.17909/T9-R086-E880 , http://archive.stsci.edu/doi/resolve/resolve.html?doi=10.17909/t9-r086-e880

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    Huang C., Wu Y., Triaud A. H. M. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/98 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...98H 825, 98

    2016 doi

  41. [50]

    X., et al., 2020a, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..204H 4, 204

    Huang C. X., et al., 2020a, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..204H 4, 204

    doi

  42. [51]

    X., et al., 2020b, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..206H 4, 206

    Huang C. X., et al., 2020b, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020RNAAS...4..206H 4, 206

    doi

  43. [52]

    C., 1993, Volume 16: how to detect and handle outliers

    Iglewicz B., Hoaglin D. C., 1993, Volume 16: how to detect and handle outliers. Quality Press

    1993

  44. [53]

    Ikwut-Ukwa M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2ee1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163....9I 163, 9

    2022 doi

  45. [54]

    D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523..802J 523, 802

    Jeffries R. D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523..802J 523, 802

    2023 doi

  46. [55]

    M., et al., 2016, in Chiozzi G., Guzman J

    Jenkins J. M., et al., 2016, in Chiozzi G., Guzman J. C., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV. p. 99133E, @doi 10.1117/12.2233418

    2016 doi

  47. [56]

    J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Kanodia S., et al., 2018, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. p. 107026Q ( @eprint arXiv 1808.00557 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2313491

    2018 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Kanodia S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acea60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166..105K 166, 105

    2023 doi

  49. [58]

    Kawash A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d5e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...937...64K 937, 64

    2022 doi

  50. [59]

    Kozai Y., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1086/108790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962AJ.....67..591K 67, 591

    1962 doi

  51. [60]

    Kunimoto M., et al., 2021, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ac2ef0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021RNAAS...5..234K 5, 234

    2021 doi

  52. [61]

    Kunimoto M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...33K 259, 33

    2022 doi

  53. [62]

    L., 1992, in Barbuy B., Renzini A., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Kurucz R. L., 1992, in Barbuy B., Renzini A., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 149, The Stellar Populations of Galaxies. p. 225

    1992

  54. [63]

    Lai D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20893.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..486L 423, 486

    2012

  55. [64]

    J., Chiang E., Ormel C

    Lee E. J., Chiang E., Ormel C. W., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797...95L 797, 95

    2014 doi

  56. [65]

    L., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P&SS....9..719L 9, 719

    Lidov M. L., 1962, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0032-0633(62)90129-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962P&SS....9..719L 9, 719

    1962 doi

  57. [66]

    Lin D. N. C., Papaloizou J., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164426 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...307..395L 307, 395

    1986 doi

  58. [67]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...4L 649, A4

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    B., Sweeney M

    Lucy L. B., Sweeney M. A., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971AJ.....76..544L 76, 544

    1971 doi

  60. [69]

    MAST 2021, TESS Light Curves - All Sectors, @doi 10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686 , http://archive.stsci.edu/doi/resolve/resolve.html?doi=10.17909/t9-nmc8-f686

    2021 doi

  61. [70]

    A., Howell S

    Matson R. A., Howell S. B., Horch E. P., Everett M. E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aac778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...31M 156, 31

    2018 doi

  62. [71]

    Mayor M., Queloz D., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1038/378355a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Natur.378..355M 378, 355

    1995 doi

  63. [72]

    McBride A., Lingg R., Kounkel M., Covey K., Hutchinson B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2432 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..282M 162, 282

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    M \'e sz \'a ros S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/120 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..120M 144, 120

    2012 doi

  65. [74]

    Montalto M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.2908M 509, 2908

    2022 doi

  66. [75]

    Naoz S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ARA&A..54..441N 54, 441

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    Ochsenbein F., Bauer P., Marcout J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&AS..143...23O 143, 23

    2000 doi

  68. [77]

    Olmschenk G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abf4c6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..273O 161, 273

    2021 doi

  69. [78]

    A., Henry T

    Paredes L. A., Henry T. J., Quinn S. N., Gies D. R., Hinojosa-Go \ n i R., James H.-S., Jao W.-C., White R. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac082a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..176P 162, 176

    2021 doi

  70. [79]

    Paxton B., Bildsten L., Dotter A., Herwig F., Lesaffre P., Timmes F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192....3P 192, 3

    2011 doi

  71. [80]

    B., Hubickyj O., Bodenheimer P., Lissauer J

    Pollack J. B., Hubickyj O., Bodenheimer P., Lissauer J. J., Podolak M., Greenzweig Y., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1996.0190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Icar..124...62P 124, 62

    1996

  72. [81]

    Poon S. T. S., Nelson R. P., Coleman G. A. L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1466 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.2500P 505, 2500

    2021 doi

  73. [82]

    N., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/80 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...745...80Q 745, 80

    Quinn S. N., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/80 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...745...80Q 745, 80

    2012 doi

  74. [83]

    A., Ford E

    Rasio F. A., Ford E. B., 1996, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.274.5289.954 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Sci...274..954R 274, 954

    1996 doi

  75. [84]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    2015 doi

  76. [85]

    Robertson P., et al., 2019, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.5.1.015003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019JATIS...5a5003R 5, 015003

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    Rodr \' guez Mart \' nez R., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9b90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...72R 169, 72

    2025 doi

  78. [87]

    E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab11d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..191R 157, 191

    Rodriguez J. E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab11d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..191R 157, 191

    2019 doi

  79. [88]

    E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abe38a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..194R 161, 194

    Rodriguez J. E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abe38a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..194R 161, 194

    2021 doi

  80. [89]

    E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad595 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.2765R 521, 2765

    Rodriguez J. E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad595 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.2765R 521, 2765

    2023 doi

  81. [90]

    STScI 2022, TESS Calibrated Full Frame Images: All Sectors, @doi 10.17909/0CP4-2J79 , http://archive.stsci.edu/doi/resolve/resolve.html?doi=10.17909/0cp4-2j79

    2022 doi

  82. [91]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..103S 737, 103

    2011 doi

  83. [92]

    C., Winn J

    Schlaufman K. C., Winn J. N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..143S 772, 143

    2013 doi

  84. [93]

    Schulte J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad4a57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168...32S 168, 32

    2024 doi

  85. [94]

    J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Schwab C., et al., 2016, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. p. 99087H, @doi 10.1117/12.2234411

    2016 doi

  86. [95]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2021.716560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021FrASS...8..138S 8, 138

    Scott N. J., et al., 2021, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2021.716560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021FrASS...8..138S 8, 138

    2021

  87. [96]

    V., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250417762S p

    Shields J. V., et al., 2025, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250417762S p. arXiv:2504.17762

    2025 arXiv

  88. [97]

    F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    2006 doi

  89. [98]

    Skumanich A., 1972, @doi [ ] 10.1086/151310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972ApJ...171..565S 171, 565

    1972 doi

  90. [99]

    K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac273c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..273S 162, 273

    Soares-Furtado M., Cantiello M., MacLeod M., Ness M. K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac273c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..273S 162, 273

    2021 doi

  91. [100]

    W., Sparks W

    Starrfield S., Truran J. W., Sparks W. M., Arnould M., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/156175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...222..600S 222, 600

    1978 doi

  92. [101]

    G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..102S 156, 102

    Stassun K. G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..102S 156, 102

    2018 doi

  93. [102]

    G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..138S 158, 138

    Stassun K. G., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..138S 158, 138

    2019 doi

  94. [103]

    Stefansson G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/175 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..175S 833, 175

    2016 doi

  95. [104]

    A., Safonov B

    Strakhov I. A., Safonov B. S., Cheryasov D. V., 2023, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341323020104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AstBu..78..234S 78, 234

    2023 doi

  96. [105]

    Tingley B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035792 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...425.1125T 425, 1125

    2004 doi

  97. [106]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abdf53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..171T 161, 171

    Tofflemire B. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abdf53 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..171T 161, 171

    2021 doi

  98. [107]

    Tokovinin A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aaa7d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASP..130c5002T 130, 035002

    2018 doi

  99. [108]

    A., Bonati M., Giguere M

    Tokovinin A., Fischer D. A., Bonati M., Giguere M. J., Moore P., Schwab C., Spronck J. F. P., Szymkowiak A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/674012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1336T 125, 1336

    2013 doi

  100. [109]

    A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1086/678764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASP..126..948V 126, 948

    Vanderburg A., Johnson J. A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1086/678764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASP..126..948V 126, 948

    2014 doi

  101. [110]

    J., Siess L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794....3V 794, 3

    Villaver E., Livio M., Mustill A. J., Siess L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794....3V 794, 3

    2014 doi

  102. [111]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatMe..17..261V 17, 261

    2020 doi

  103. [112]

    X., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae385 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.5394W 528, 5394

    Wang E. X., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae385 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.5394W 528, 5394

    2024 doi

  104. [113]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    2010 doi

  105. [114]

    Wu D.-H., Rice M., Wang S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acbf3f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165..171W 165, 171

    2023 doi

  106. [115]

    W., Winn J

    Yee S. W., Winn J. N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acd552 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...949L..21Y 949, L21

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac73ff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164...70Y 164, 70

    Yee S. W., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac73ff , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164...70Y 164, 70

    2022 doi

  108. [117]

    W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aca286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265....1Y 265, 1

    Yee S. W., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aca286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265....1Y 265, 1

    2023 doi

  109. [118]

    W., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2507.01855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250701855Y p

    Yee S. W., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2507.01855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250701855Y p. arXiv:2507.01855

    2025 doi arXiv

  110. [119]

    H., Lejeune T., Barnes S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321795 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..136..417Y 136, 417

    Yi S., Demarque P., Kim Y.-C., Lee Y.-W., Ree C. H., Lejeune T., Barnes S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321795 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJS..136..417Y 136, 417

    2001 doi

  111. [120]

    Zhou G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abba22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161....2Z 161, 2

    2021 doi

  112. [121]

    W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...19Z 159, 19

    Ziegler C., Tokovinin A., Brice \ n o C., Mang J., Law N., Mann A. W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab55e9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159...19Z 159, 19

    2020 doi

  113. [122]

    K., Howard A

    Zink J. K., Howard A. W., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acfdab , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956L..29Z 956, L29

    2023 doi

  114. [123]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.