$P$-type Ru$_2$Ti$_{1-x}$Hf$_x$Si full-Heusler bulk thermoelectrics with $zT = 0.7$

Andrej Pustogow; Ernst Bauer; Fabian Garmroudi; Illia Serhiienko; Michael Parzer; Raimund Podloucky; Takao Mori

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 17 references

$P$-type Ru$_2$Ti$_{1-x}$Hf$_x$Si full-Heusler bulk thermoelectrics with $zT = 0.7$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Hafnium substitution in p-type Ru2TiSi produces a full-Heusler thermoelectric with zT ≈ 0.7, confirming p-type as the better direction.

desk verdict A credible record zT ≈ 0.7 in a full-Heusler, confirmed by solid phase characterization; the Lorenz-number concern is a red herring, but missing error bars and placeholder SI need fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02765 v1 pith:NR5RWHPW submitted 2025-09-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Fabian Garmroudi , Illia Serhiienko , Michael Parzer , Andrej Pustogow , Raimund Podloucky , Takao Mori , Ernst Bauer This is my paper

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 72.20.Pa

keywords thermoelectricsfull-HeuslerRu2TiSiHfsubstitutionfigureofmeritzTlatticethermalconductivityp-typesemiconductorstwo-bandmodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that replacing a fifth of the titanium in the full-Heusler semiconductor Ru2TiSi with hafnium produces a p-type thermoelectric with a figure of merit zT ≈ 0.7 over 700–1000 K — the highest value reported for any bulk full-Heusler material. The result matters because full-Heuslers combine semiconductor-like electronic properties with mechanical strength and chemical stability, making them attractive for waste-heat modules, but they had lagged behind other thermoelectrics. The paper shows that isovalent Hf substitution is the key: it preserves the favorable Ru-dominated valence bands and hole mobility while introducing heavy-mass and strain disorder that scatters phonons and cuts lattice thermal conductivity. The measurements confirm a prior model prediction that p-type Ru2TiSi would beat n-type, and the same two-band model indicates that co-substitution could push zT above 1.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is isovalent heavy-element substitution at the Y site of an X2YZ full-Heusler: Hf replaces Ti on the 4a site, adding strong atomic-mass and strain fluctuations that scatter phonons, while leaving the Ru t2g-dominated valence bands that carry hole transport effectively untouched. The supporting analytical machinery is a two-parabolic-band model, implemented in the SeeBand fitting code, that simultaneously fits the temperature-dependent Seebeck coefficient and electrical resistivity to extract the band gap, Fermi-level position, and a valence/conduction band weighting parameter. This model is what connects the observed Seebeck shifts to electronic-structure changes and qu

What would settle it

Re-measure thermal conductivity, Seebeck coefficient, and electrical resistivity on the same Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si specimen and determine the Lorenz number independently at 700–1000 K; if the true value deviates from 1.5 + exp(−|S|/116), the lattice-conductivity suppression and the zT ≈ 0.7 claim change. A direct lattice-conductivity measurement, such as comparing samples with identical electronic properties but altered phonon scattering, would test the phonon-suppression mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is experimental: single-phase Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si reaches zT ≈ 0.7 in the 700–1000 K window, exceeding all known full-Heusler thermoelectrics. Structural work shows Hf is fully soluble at the Ti site up to about x = 0.2, with a miscibility gap from roughly x = 0.26 to 0.8; compositions beyond this limit phase-separate and lose performance. In the single-phase range, Hf substitution suppresses lattice thermal conductivity to about 3.4 W m−1 K−1 at x = 0.2 without degrading the power factor, because the valence band maximum is dominated by Ru t2g states and is insensitive to Ti-site disorder. A two-parabolic-band fit to Seebeck and resistivity shows Hf raises the band gap, sh

Load-bearing premise

The reported zT depends on estimating how much of the measured thermal conductivity comes from electrons using a standard empirical formula; if that estimate is wrong for this particular alloy, the extracted lattice conductivity and the whole zT plateau shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If zT ≈ 0.7 is real, Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si becomes the reference p-type full-Heusler and a candidate for mid-temperature waste-heat conversion.
The two-band model projects that shifting the Fermi level 70 meV deeper into the valence band could raise the power factor to about 7.5 mW m−1 K−2 and zT to 0.8–0.9 without changing the alloy.
Further lowering lattice conductivity by co-substitution with other heavy elements, such as Zr at the Ti site or Ge/Sn at the Si site, is predicted to push zT above 1.
The combination of high zT with the mechanical strength and chemical stability of full-Heuslers makes this family more competitive for practical thermoelectric modules.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the valence band is Ru-dominated, other substitutions that preserve the Ru sublattice but vary the Y or Z site should also retain hole mobility; this hints at a broader design rule: reduce lattice thermal conductivity by alloying on sites that do not contribute to the transport bands.
The paper reports that resistivity slightly decreases with Hf content, a trend it leaves unexplained; Hall-effect measurements across x = 0, 0.1, and 0.2 would show whether this is a carrier-concentration shift or a band-structure effect.
The two-band fits deviate below 400 K, which the authors attribute to a possible second valence band; if that band is confirmed, the Fermi-level-optimization estimates would likely need revision.
If the same Hf-substitution strategy transfers to other 24-electron full-Heuslers with X-dominated valence bands, the record performance may be reproducible beyond Ru2TiSi.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this paper delivers a genuine experimental advance—p-type Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si with zT ≈ 0.7 over 700–1000 K, the highest reported for any full-Heusler. It confirms the authors' earlier two-band prediction that p-type outperforms n-type in this system.

What is new and done well: first thermoelectric characterization of this Hf-substituted series, with careful XRD/SEM/EDS mapping of the solubility limit and a clear miscibility gap. The single-phase samples are cleanly identified; the transport measurements are standard; and the observation that Hf substitution cuts lattice thermal conductivity without hurting resistivity is physically sensible and well supported. The two-band model fits are transparent, and the authors acknowledge the model's limitations (e.g., possible second valence band below 400 K).

The reader's weakest-assumption flag about the empirical Lorenz number is largely a red herring for the main claim. zT uses the measured total thermal conductivity; the Wiedemann–Franz separation only affects the plotted κL, not the zT value. The real soft spots are elsewhere.

First, there are no error bars anywhere, and no repeated transport measurements on independent batches. High-temperature laser-flash thermal conductivity with a pyroceram Cp reference and graphite coating is standard but can carry 10–15% systematic error from radiative losses. A 15% overestimate of κ would put zT at ~0.6 rather than 0.7—still above the previous full-Heusler best (~0.4), so the record claim is robust, but the exact magnitude is not tightly pinned.

Second, the manuscript contains placeholder citations (Fig. SXX, Table SXX) for the Rietveld refinement and reproducibility data. That is a concrete incompleteness that must be fixed.

Third, the predicted path to zT > 1 by lowering EF is an extrapolation of a fitted model, not a verified result. To the authors' credit, they frame it as a strategy, and it is consistent with their prior prediction, so it's not overreach.

Who this is for: thermoelectric materials researchers and the Heusler community. It will be a reference point for full-Heusler performance. It deserves a serious referee; I would accept it with minor-to-moderate revision requiring error estimates, measurement details, and completion of the SI.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis, structural characterization, and thermoelectric properties of p-type full-Heusler Ru2Ti1-xHfxSi (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4). Using XRD, SEM/EDS, and lattice-parameter measurements, the authors establish a Hf solubility limit near x ≈ 0.26 and a miscibility gap. Seebeck, resistivity, and thermal conductivity measurements yield a maximum zT ≈ 0.7 for x = 0.2 sustained over 700–1000 K, which is claimed as the highest value among full-Heusler materials. A two-parabolic-band model is fit to the Seebeck and resistivity data to extract electronic-structure parameters (EF, Eg, εm) and to predict further zT improvements via co-substitution.

Significance. If the experimental result is robust, it would establish Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si as the best-performing full-Heusler thermoelectric reported to date, validate earlier p-type predictions, and motivate further exploration of this materials family. The study combines careful phase and microstructure analysis across two synthesis routes, and the two-band modeling provides a useful framework for rationalizing transport trends. The record claim is based on measured total thermal conductivity, so the empirical Lorenz-number approximation used to extract lattice conductivity does not directly affect the zT value. However, the experimental uncertainties in zT are not quantified, and several supporting data are referenced only as unresolved placeholders (Fig. SXX, Table SXX). These issues must be resolved before the record claim can be fully evaluated.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 2.2, Fig. 3] The central claim zT ≈ 0.7 over 700–1000 K is reported without error bars or uncertainty propagation. Since zT = S²T/(ρ·κ_total) and κ_total = χ·C_p·d, each measured quantity contributes uncertainty; at high temperature, laser-flash diffusivity and the pyroceram comparative C_p method are prone to systematic errors (radiation losses, reference uncertainty). No repeated measurements or independent verification are described. Please provide at least estimated uncertainties (instrumental plus systematic) or reproducibility data across samples; without these, the value and its record status are not tightly constrained.
[Sec. 4.2, Fig. 3(e)] The thermal conductivity measurement uses a graphite-coated sample for LFA and a pyroceram-9606 comparative method for C_p. No details are given on the high-temperature data reduction, radiation correction, or validation of C_p(T) above ~700 K. Since κ_total enters zT directly, a description of the measurement and validation is needed. In addition, the caption of Fig. 3(e) should clearly define open versus filled symbols (total versus lattice/bipolar) and state that the Wiedemann–Franz subtraction uses L = 1.5 + exp(−|S|/116) with S in μV/K.
[Sec. 2.1] The text refers to 'Fig. SXX and Table SXX' for Rietveld refinement, actual Hf content at the 4a site, and reproducibility data from TU Wien samples. These placeholder references are unresolved and the corresponding supporting information is not available. This missing support is load-bearing for the claims of single-phase solubility and synthesis reproducibility; the placeholders must be filled with actual data before publication.
[Sec. 2.3, Fig. 5(c)] The prediction that lowering EF by 70 meV would increase the power factor to ~7.5 mW/mK² and zT to 0.8–0.9 is an extrapolation based on a two-parabolic-band model with acoustic-phonon scattering, constant κL, and no additional valence band. The authors themselves note deviations below 400 K that may indicate a second valence band. This prediction should be framed as a model-derived design target, not as a demonstrated optimization, and the abstract's 'zT > 1' statement should be softened accordingly.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 2.3] Typo: 'desribe' should be 'describe' in the sentence about DFT+U calculations.
[References] Reference [73] is incomplete: 'Applied Physics Letters, 2022, 120, year.' Please update with full page/article number.
[Fig. 3] The caption defines open and filled symbols for total and lattice/bipolar thermal conductivity, but the distinction is not immediately clear in the figure itself; consider adding a legend inside the panel.
[Sec. 2.2] The formula L = 1.5 + exp(−|S|/116) should explicitly state that S is in μV/K, and the text should note that κL includes the bipolar contribution as acknowledged.
[Abstract/Introduction] The sentence 'These results not only represent the largest values known to date among full-Heusler materials but confirm earlier theoretical predictions...' is grammatically awkward; consider splitting for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: measured zT is independent of the fitted two-band model; self-citations are prior predictions, not inputs.

full rationale

The central claim, zT ~ 0.7 for Ru2Ti0.8Hf0.2Si, is an experimental result: S and rho are measured by ZEM-3, and kappa_total is obtained from kappa = chi * Cp * d, with chi from laser-flash, Cp from the pyroceram comparative method, and d from Archimedes. The Wiedemann–Franz/Lorenz separation (L = 1.5 + exp(-|S|/116)) is used only to extract the lattice-plus-bipolar contribution kappa_L for mechanistic interpretation; it does not enter zT = S^2/(rho*kappa_total)*T. The two-parabolic-band model is explicitly a least-squares fit of S(T) and rho(T), with EF, Eg, and epsilon_m presented as fitted parameters, not as first-principles outputs. The grey-dashed curves in Fig. 5(c) are model extrapolations for shifted Fermi-level positions, clearly framed as scenarios ('assuming the same kappa_L'), not as measured predictions. The agreement with ref. [63] is a prior, externally falsifiable prediction by the same group; citing that agreement is a confirmation, not a circular input. The record comparison against Fe2VAl-based full-Heuslers is also independent of the model. The remaining concerns—placeholder Fig. SXX/Table SXX, no error bars, and no independent thermal-conductivity method above 700 K—are completeness and measurement-uncertainty issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measured zT depends mainly on the Wiedemann-Franz assumption and experimental accuracy. The two-band model introduces four fitted parameters (EF, Eg, epsilon_m, scattering times) that carry the electronic-structure interpretation and the forward-looking zT > 1 projection. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)

Fermi level position EF relative to valence band edge = Varies with composition; e.g., ~0.05 eV for x=0.2 (Fig. 5)
Fitted to temperature-dependent Seebeck coefficient using a two-band parabolic model (Sec. 2.3).
Band gap Eg = Between 0.25 and 0.45 eV across compositions (Fig. 4c)
Fitted to S(T) using the two-band model (Sec. 2.3).
Band weighting parameter epsilon_m = (N1 m2)/(N2 m1) = Increases by more than an order of magnitude with Hf content (Fig. 4b)
Fitted along with EF and Eg to S(T) to determine relative valence/conduction band contributions (Sec. 2.3).
Band scattering times (or mobility parameters) = Not explicitly quoted; extracted from simultaneous fit of rho(T) and S(T)
Used to model resistivity in the self-consistent SeeBand fit (Sec. 2.3, Fig. 5).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption A two-parabolic-band model with dominant acoustic phonon scattering accurately describes the electronic transport of Ru2Ti1-xHfxSi.
Invoked in Sec. 2.3 to fit S(T) and rho(T) and to extract electronic structure parameters and project zT improvements.
domain assumption The Wiedemann-Franz law with the empirical Lorenz number L = 1.5 + exp(-|S|/116) correctly separates electronic and lattice thermal conductivity.
Used in Sec. 2.2 to estimate kappa_L and thus to compute zT from measured total thermal conductivity.
domain assumption DFT calculations with GGA-PBE exchange-correlation and spin-orbit coupling provide reliable band structures and densities of states for Ru2TiSi and Ru2HfSi.
Used in Sec. 2.3 and Fig. 4 to interpret the fitted two-band parameters and rationalize Hf-induced electronic structure changes.
domain assumption The solubility limit of Hf in Ru2Ti1-xHfxSi is approximately x = 0.26, and samples with x <= 0.2 are single-phase.
Based on XRD and SEM analyses in Sec. 2.1; this justifies focusing on x = 0.1 and 0.2 as the relevant single-phase compositions for thermoelectric evaluation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $P$-type Ru$_2$Ti$_{1-x}$Hf$_x$Si full-Heusler bulk thermoelectrics with $zT = 0.7$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NR5RWHPW

@misc{pith2026250902765,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $P$-type Ru$_2$Ti$_1-x$Hf$_x$Si full-Heusler bulk thermoelectrics with $zT = 0.7$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NR5RWHPW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02765}
}

abstract

Heusler compounds have emerged as important thermoelectric materials due to their combination of promising electronic transport properties, mechanical robustness and chemical stability -- key aspects for practical device integration. While a wide range of XYZ-type half-Heusler compounds have been studied for high-temperature applications, X$_2$YZ-type full-Heuslers, often characterized by narrower band gaps, may offer potential advantages at different temperature regimes but remain less explored. In this work, we report the discovery of $p$-type Ru$_2$Ti$_{1-x}$Hf$_x$Si full-Heusler thermoelectrics, exhibiting a high figure of merit $zT \sim 0.7$ over a broad range of temperatures $700-1000$ K. These results not only represent the largest values known to date among full-Heusler materials but confirm earlier theoretical predictions that $p$-type Ru$_2$TiSi systems would be superior to their $n$-type counterparts. Moreover, using a two-band model, we unveil electronic structure changes induced by the Hf substitution at the Ti site and outline strategies to further improve $zT$ up to $zT > 1$. Our findings highlight the untapped potential of new semiconducting full-Heusler phases and the crucial need for continued exploration of this rich materials class for thermoelectric applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Pecunia, S

1 V. Pecunia, S. R. P. Silva, J. D. Phillips, E. Artegiani, A. Romeo, H. Shim, J. Park, J. H. Kim, J. S. Yun, G. C. Welch et al., Journal of Physics: Materials , 2023, 6, 042501. 2 G. J. Snyder and E. S. Toberer, Nature materials , 2008, 7, 105–114. 3 Q. Yan and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nature materials , 2022, 21, 503–513. 4 H. Goldsmid and R. Douglas, British ...

work page 2023
[50]

77 P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953–17979. 78 G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B , 1999, 59, 1758–

work page 1994
[135]

65 G. J. Snyder, A. H. Snyder, M. Wood, R. Gurunathan, B. H. Snyder and C. Niu, Advanced Materials, 2020, 32, 2001537. 66 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 1996, 77, 3865–3868. 67 A. Riss, M. Stöger, M. Parzer, F. Garmroudi, N. Reumann, B. Hinterleitner, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Physical Review Ap- plied, 2023, 19, 054024. 68 A. Ris...

work page 2020
[171]

Garmroudi, M

72 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, A. Pustogow, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Physical Review B, 2023, 107, L081108. 73 M. Parzer, F. Garmroudi, A. Riss, S. Khmelevskyi, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Applied Physics Letters , 2022, 120, year. 74 L. Akselrud and Y. Grin, Journal of Applied Crystallography , 2014, 47, 803–805. 75 G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. ...

work page 2023
[184]

Takagiwa and Y

60 Y. Takagiwa and Y. Iwasaki, ACS Applied Energy Materials , 2023, 6, 8256–8265. 61 F. Garmroudi, I. Serhiienko, M. Parzer, S. Ghosh, P. Zi- olkowski, G. Oppitz, H. D. Nguyen, C. Bourgès, Y. Hattori, A. Riss et al., Nature Communications, 2025, 16,

work page 2023
[386]

Wright, Nature, 1958, 181, 834–834

5 D. Wright, Nature, 1958, 181, 834–834. 6 A. F. Ioffe, Semiconductor Thermoelements, and Thermoelec- tric Cooling, Infosearch, London,

work page 1958
[864]

Diack-Rasselio, O

46 A. Diack-Rasselio, O. Rouleau, L. Coulomb, L. Georgeton, M. Beaudhuin, J.-C. Crivello and E. Alleno,Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 920, 166037. 47 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, A. V. Ruban, S. Khmelevskyi, M. Reticcioli, M. Knopf, H. Michor, A. Pus- togow, T. Mori et al. , Nature communications , 2022, 13,

work page 2022
[1152]

28 S. Li, K. Snyder, M. S. Akhanda, R. Martukanitz, M. Mitra, 1–8 | 7 J. Poon and M. Zebarjadi, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 195, 123181. 29 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, C. Bourgès, S. Khmelevskyi, T. Mori, E. Bauer and A. Pustogow, Science Advances, 2023, 9, eadj1611. 30 A. Riss, F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, C. Eisenmenger-Sitt...

work page 2022

Show all 17 references

[1366]

12 A. U. Khan, K. Kobayashi, D.-M. Tang, Y. Yamauchi, K. Hasegawa, M. Mitome, Y. Xue, B. Jiang, K. Tsuchiya, D. Golberg et al., Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 152–159. 13 Z.-Y. Liu, J.-L. Zhu, X. Tong, S. Niu and W.-Y. Zhao, Journal of Advanced Ceramics , 2020, 9, 647–673. 14 G. Rogl ...

2017
[1843]

15 G. Rogl, F. Garmroudi, A. Riss, X. Yan, J. Sereni, E. Bauer and P. Rogl, Intermetallics, 2022, 146, 107567. 16 G. Nolas, J. Cohn, G. Slack and S. Schujman, Applied Physics Letters, 1998, 73, 178–180. 17 A. Saramat, G. Svensson, A. Palmqvist, C. Stiewe, E. Müller, D. Platzek...

2022
[1864]

20 S. M. Kauzlarich, S. R. Brown and G. J. Snyder, Dalton Transactions, 2007, 2099–2107. 21 J. Shuai, J. Mao, S. Song, Q. Zhang, G. Chen and Z. Ren, Materials T oday Physics, 2017, 1, 74–95. 22 J. Mao, H. Zhu, Z. Ding, Z. Liu, G. A. Gamage, G. Chen and Z. Ren, Science, 2019, 3...

2007
[1957]

7 L. Xu, Y. Xiao, S. Wang, B. Cui, D. Wu, X. Ding and L.-D. Zhao, Nature Communications, 2022, 13,

2022
[2976]

Fujimoto, M

62 T. Fujimoto, M. Mikami, H. Miyazaki and Y. Nishino, Jour- nal of Alloys and Compounds , 2023, 969, 172345. 63 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, T. Mori, A. Pustogow and E. Bauer, PRX Energy, 2025, 4, 013010. 64 W. B. Pearson, The crystal chemistry and physics of metals and alloys, J...

2023
[3599]

Anand, R

48 S. Anand, R. Gurunathan, T. Soldi, L. Borgsmiller, R. Oren- stein and G. J. Snyder, Journal of Materials Chemistry C , 2020, 8, 10174–10184. 49 B. Hinterleitner, F. Garmroudi, N. Reumann, T. Mori, E. Bauer and R. Podloucky , Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2021, 9, 2073–2...

2020
[4565]

Nishino, S

43 Y. Nishino, S. Deguchi and U. Mizutani, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 2006, 74, 115115. 44 M. Mikami, Y. Kinemuchi, K. Ozaki, Y. Terazawa and T. Takeuchi, Journal of Applied Physics , 2012, 111, 093710. 45 E. Alleno, Metals, 2018, 8,

2006
[6449]

8 B. Jia, D. Wu, L. Xie, W. Wang, T. Yu, S. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, B. Jiang, Z. Chen et al., Science, 2024, 384, 81–86. 9 Y. Qin, B. Qin, T. Hong, X. Zhang, D. Wang, D. Liu, Z.-Y. Wang, L. Su, S. Wang, X. Gao et al. , Science, 2024, 383, 1204–1209. 10 C. Zhou, Y. K. Lee, Y. Yu, S...

2024
[8144]

25 T. Zhu, C. Fu, H. Xie, Y. Liu and X. Zhao, Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, 5, 1500588. 26 W. G. Zeier, J. Schmitt, G. Hautier, U. Aydemir, Z. M. Gibbs, C. Felser and G. J. Snyder, Nature Reviews Materials , 2016, 1, 1–10. 27 G. Rogl and P. F. Rogl, Crystals, 2023, 13,

2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Pecunia, S

1 V. Pecunia, S. R. P. Silva, J. D. Phillips, E. Artegiani, A. Romeo, H. Shim, J. Park, J. H. Kim, J. S. Yun, G. C. Welch et al., Journal of Physics: Materials , 2023, 6, 042501. 2 G. J. Snyder and E. S. Toberer, Nature materials , 2008, 7, 105–114. 3 Q. Yan and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nature materials , 2022, 21, 503–513. 4 H. Goldsmid and R. Douglas, British ...

work page 2023

[2] [50]

77 P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953–17979. 78 G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B , 1999, 59, 1758–

work page 1994

[3] [135]

65 G. J. Snyder, A. H. Snyder, M. Wood, R. Gurunathan, B. H. Snyder and C. Niu, Advanced Materials, 2020, 32, 2001537. 66 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 1996, 77, 3865–3868. 67 A. Riss, M. Stöger, M. Parzer, F. Garmroudi, N. Reumann, B. Hinterleitner, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Physical Review Ap- plied, 2023, 19, 054024. 68 A. Ris...

work page 2020

[4] [171]

Garmroudi, M

72 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, A. Pustogow, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Physical Review B, 2023, 107, L081108. 73 M. Parzer, F. Garmroudi, A. Riss, S. Khmelevskyi, T. Mori and E. Bauer, Applied Physics Letters , 2022, 120, year. 74 L. Akselrud and Y. Grin, Journal of Applied Crystallography , 2014, 47, 803–805. 75 G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. ...

work page 2023

[5] [184]

Takagiwa and Y

60 Y. Takagiwa and Y. Iwasaki, ACS Applied Energy Materials , 2023, 6, 8256–8265. 61 F. Garmroudi, I. Serhiienko, M. Parzer, S. Ghosh, P. Zi- olkowski, G. Oppitz, H. D. Nguyen, C. Bourgès, Y. Hattori, A. Riss et al., Nature Communications, 2025, 16,

work page 2023

[6] [386]

Wright, Nature, 1958, 181, 834–834

5 D. Wright, Nature, 1958, 181, 834–834. 6 A. F. Ioffe, Semiconductor Thermoelements, and Thermoelec- tric Cooling, Infosearch, London,

work page 1958

[7] [864]

Diack-Rasselio, O

46 A. Diack-Rasselio, O. Rouleau, L. Coulomb, L. Georgeton, M. Beaudhuin, J.-C. Crivello and E. Alleno,Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 920, 166037. 47 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, A. V. Ruban, S. Khmelevskyi, M. Reticcioli, M. Knopf, H. Michor, A. Pus- togow, T. Mori et al. , Nature communications , 2022, 13,

work page 2022

[8] [1152]

28 S. Li, K. Snyder, M. S. Akhanda, R. Martukanitz, M. Mitra, 1–8 | 7 J. Poon and M. Zebarjadi, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 195, 123181. 29 F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, A. Riss, C. Bourgès, S. Khmelevskyi, T. Mori, E. Bauer and A. Pustogow, Science Advances, 2023, 9, eadj1611. 30 A. Riss, F. Garmroudi, M. Parzer, C. Eisenmenger-Sitt...

work page 2022