Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Ride Height and Rake Angle in a Sedan Car Using CFD and Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.02917 v1 pith:VICFIMSJ submitted 2025-09-03 physics.flu-dyn

Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Ride Height and Rake Angle in a Sedan Car Using CFD and Machine Learning

classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords optimizationaerodynamicdragreynoldsrideanglebalancedcoefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This study investigates the aerodynamic performance of an Audi A4 sedan using CFD analysis. A 3D model was developed in SolidWorks and validated against DrivAer Notchback wind-tunnel data, showing only a 3.25 percent deviation in drag coefficient (Cd). Ride height varied from 1.336 to 1.536 m and rake angle from 0 to 5 degrees, across four Reynolds numbers. Gradient Boosting emerged as the most accurate predictive model (R square = 0.97 for Cd and 0.96 for lift coefficient, Cl), outperforming Random Forest and LightGBM. Differential Evolution optimization was performed under balanced, drag-focused, and downforce-focused conditions. Reynolds number had minimal impact on optimum location; therefore, detailed results are reported for one Reynolds number, with other Re showing similar trends. The baseline geometry exhibited Cd = 0.313 and Cl = 0.0288. Balanced optimization achieved Cd = 0.287 and Cl = - 0.0826. Minimum drag condition reached Cd = 0.285 with slight positive lift (Cl = 0.0142), while maximum downforce optimization reached Cl = - 0.1084 with a 6.71 percent drag penalty (Cd = 0.334). Near-optimal solutions were found within ride heights of 1.341 to 1.365 m and rakes of 0.158 to 4.610 degrees, indicating robust aerodynamic performance. Machine learning predictions were further validated against CFD with a small error in Cd.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.