Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Tilted Dirac cones and their topology in Holographic Materials

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tilting a Dirac cone holographically leaves its Chern number unchanged.

desk verdict Clean holographic exercise, but the tilted cone is a coordinate relabeling for |zeta|<1 and an ill-defined Euclidean geometry for zeta>1, so the main physical claims do not hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03033 v1 pith:HKNHQSUS submitted 2025-09-03 hep-th cond-mat.str-el

Jeong-Won Seo , Taewon Yuk , Sang-Jin Sin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-el
keywords TiltedDiracconeTopologicalinvariantChernnumberWeylsemimetalAdS/CMTHolographySpectralfunctionOpticalconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that a tilted Dirac cone—the band structure of certain Dirac materials in which the linear dispersion is deformed by a tilt vector—can be realized in a holographic model by promoting a tilted vielbein to the boundary condition of an asymptotically anti-de Sitter bulk. Coupling the resulting geometry to holographic fermions yields a retarded Green's function whose pole locus is exactly the tilted cone, so the spectral function exhibits type-I, type-II, and type-III tilts. The Chern number computed from the same Green's function is $-1$, independent of the tilting parameter, meaning the band topology is robust against tilting. The model also predicts that in the overtilted (type-II) regime the optical conductivity develops a Drude peak even at zero chemical potential, a strong-coupling effect absent in weakly coupled field theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the tilted vielbein $e^\mu_a$, a frame field that encodes the tilt vector $\zeta$ as off-diagonal time-space entries; uplifting it to the AdS boundary condition produces the bulk metric (3.4). The calculation is carried by the Riccati-flow method for holographic fermions, which turns the bulk Dirac equation into a flow equation for the matrix ratio $G(u)=C(u)S^{-1}(u)$; in the pure-AdS limit the flow integrates in closed form to (3.18). The topological-number computation uses the Green's-function Berry-curvature formula and the zero-frequency topological Hamiltonian $H_t(\mathbf{k})=-G^{-1}(0,\mathbf{k})$, both of which give the same $\zeta_x$-independent Berry flux $F_i=-k_i/(2|\mathbf{k}|^3)$.

What would settle it

Substitute the metric ansatz (3.4) directly into the vacuum Einstein equations and check whether $R_{\mu\nu}+\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}=0$ holds identically for $f(u)=1-(u/u_H)^4$ and $u_H=\sqrt{1-\zeta_x^2}/(\pi T)$; if the equations are not identically satisfied, the spectral function, Chern number, and conductivity are off-shell and the holographic realization fails. On the material side, the predicted zero-chemical-potential Drude peak in the type-II optical conductivity is a directly measurable signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the observation that a tilted Dirac cone can be described by a vielbein $e^\mu_a$ that mixes time and space components through a tilt vector $\zeta$, the authors take that vielbein as the boundary data of a five-dimensional asymptotically AdS spacetime. The bulk metric (3.4), with $f(u)=1-(u/u_H)^4$ and $u_H=\sqrt{1-\zeta_x^2}/(\pi T)$, is the holographic uplift of this tilted boundary geometry. Solving the Dirac equation in that background, they obtain the closed-form retarded Green's function $G_R=[1/\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2-(\omega+\zeta_x k_x)^2}]$ times a matrix linear in $\omega+\zeta_x k_x$ and $\mathbf{k}$, so the pole locus is exactly the tilted cone. From this Green's function, both the Green's-function Berry-curvature formula and the zero-frequency topological Hamiltonian give $F_i=-k_i/(2|\mathbf{k}|^3)$, independent of $\zeta_x$, so the Chern number is $-1$. The same background yields an optical conductivity whose type-I tilt slightly suppresses the linear-in-$\omega$ response, while the type-II tilt produces a growing Drude peak at $\mu=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the metric ansatz (3.4), with $f(u)=1-(u/u_H)^4$ and $u_H=\sqrt{1-\zeta_x^2}/(\pi T)$, genuinely solves the vacuum Einstein equations with the tilted boundary condition; the paper asserts this without showing the calculation, and if it fails, every downstream result is computed in an off-shell geometry rather than in a holographic dual.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The holographic spectral function reproduces all three tilt classes—type-I ($|\zeta|<1$), type-II ($|\zeta|>1$), and type-III ($|\zeta|=1$)—so a single holographic model covers the whole family of tilted Dirac materials.
  • Because the Chern number stays $-1$ for any $\zeta_x$, smooth tilting deformations cannot change the Berry-curvature contribution to the anomalous Hall response; the paper notes that strain that only tilts the cone will not affect this contribution.
  • In the type-II regime, the model predicts a Drude peak at zero chemical potential, a signal of pair-created charge carriers at the Dirac point that is absent in weakly coupled models and is measurable in optical-conductivity experiments.
  • Comparison with photonic orbital graphene at $\beta=0.45$ gives a holographically extracted tilt close to the value inferred from the experimental slopes, indicating the model can be quantitatively fitted to real tilted-Dirac data.
  • Bulk symmetry-breaking operators gap the cone, create flat bands, or produce crossed topological-liquid poles, and tilting preserves these features while rotating them with the cone, extending holographic mean-field phenomenology to tilted systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the closed form (3.18) is essentially a boosted version of the standard AdS fermion Green's function, which suggests the tilt may be a boundary Lorentz transformation rather than a genuine deformation; that would explain the $\zeta_x$-independence of the Chern number and predicts similar tilt-independence for other Green's-function topological invariants.
  • A natural next test is to compute the full frequency-dependent Hall conductivity in the tilted background beyond the Berry-curvature formula; the paper's $\zeta_x$-independent flux suggests the DC Hall response remains quantized, though finite-temperature interaction corrections could shift it from the free-fermion value.
  • The same uplift should apply to Weyl semimetals with multiple nodes: tilting each node by an opposite $\zeta$ would give a holographic type-II Weyl semimetal, where the zero-density Drude peak predicted here could be tested against transport anomalies in candidate materials.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a holographic realization of tilted Dirac cones by uplifting Volovik's tilted vielbein into an asymptotically AdS bulk metric, then coupling this background to holographic Dirac fermions. The authors compute the boundary fermion spectral function, the Chern number from the analytic Green's function, and the optical conductivity, and they compare the spectral function with photonic orbital graphene data. The headline claims are: (i) type-I, type-II, and type-III tilted Dirac cones appear in the holographic spectral function; (ii) the Chern number is -1 and independent of the tilting parameter; and (iii) the optical conductivity exhibits a Drude peak at zero chemical potential in the overtilted regime.

Significance. If the construction worked as advertised, it would open a holographic window onto strongly correlated tilted Dirac materials. The analytic Green's function in Eq. (3.18) is derived cleanly, and the bulk metric ansatz (3.4), with f(u)=1-(u/u_H)^4 and u_H=sqrt(1-ζ_x^2)/(πT), does satisfy the vacuum Einstein equations for ζ_x<1, as can be verified by direct substitution. However, the central physics is undermined because the tilt is introduced through a boundary coordinate transformation rather than through a genuine Lorentz-violating deformation of the dual field theory. The overtilted regime ζ_x>1 is not described by a well-defined thermal state in the standard holographic dictionary, and the topological calculation uses the free-field (pure AdS) Green's function rather than the strongly coupled finite-temperature one. The experimental comparison relies on an undefined shifting parameter. These issues severely limit the significance of the results.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.3)] The tilted boundary metric (3.3) is flat Minkowski space in the linear coordinates t'=t, x'=x+ζ_x t (and similarly for y,z): -dt^2+(dx+ζ_x dt)^2 = (-1+ζ_x^2)dt^2+2ζ_x dt dx+dx^2. Therefore the boundary dual is the standard Lorentz-invariant CFT, and the 'tilted Dirac cone' in the spectral function (3.19) is merely the ordinary CFT fermion spectral function written in a non-orthogonal coordinate frame. The construction does not introduce a Lorentz-violating deformation of the boundary theory, so the central claim of realizing tilted Dirac materials in holography is not supported. A genuine realization would require a non-normalizable source for a Lorentz-breaking operator, not a boundary coordinate change.
  2. [§4.1, Fig. 6(b); §3.4, Fig. 2(c,g)] The Drude peak at zero chemical potential in the overtilted regime ζ_x>1 is not a well-defined physical prediction. For ζ_x>1, the bulk coordinate t is spacelike (g_tt=(ζ_x^2-1)f/u^2>0), u_H=sqrt(1-ζ_x^2)/(πT) is imaginary, and the Euclidean continuation t=-iτ gives a complex metric rather than a positive-definite Euclidean section. The infalling boundary conditions and Kubo formula used in the conductivity computation are therefore not tied to a physical thermal state of a boundary CFT. The same problem afflicts the type-II spectral functions in Fig. 2(c,g). The authors need to identify the timelike boundary Killing vector and recompute observables in the corresponding orthonormal frame, or introduce an actual Lorentz-violating boundary source; otherwise these results are artifacts of an acausal coordinate choice.
  3. [§3.6, Eqs. (3.18)-(3.29)] The topological number is computed from the pure AdS (T=0) analytic Green's function (3.18), which is the free Dirac propagator with the tilt appearing only through the combination ω+ζ_x k_x. Since the tilt term is proportional to the identity matrix in the topological Hamiltonian H_t(k) of Eq. (3.26), the eigenvectors and Berry curvature are independent of ζ_x by construction. This does not address the paper's stated question of whether strong interactions preserve the integer Chern number; the fuzzy finite-temperature holographic Green's function is never used in the topological computation. To support the robustness claim, the winding number should be computed from the numerical finite-T Green's function rather than from the free fixed-point formula.
  4. [§3.5, Fig. 3(b)] The comparison with photonic orbital graphene relies on an undefined 'shifting parameter Bx' and an adjustable 'proper scale', in addition to the tilt parameter and the fermion mass. With these free parameters, the agreement shown in Fig. 3 does not provide quantitative evidence for the holographic model. Moreover, the photonic system is non-interacting, so the claimed strong-coupling interpretation of the comparison is not justified. The parameter Bx must be defined and the fitting procedure specified before the agreement can be evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The section references in the Introduction are incorrect: the text says 'In Section 1, we introduce...' and 'Section 2 details...', but the actual numbering is Section 2 for tilted Dirac cones, Section 3 for the holographic model, and Section 4 for the conductivity.
  2. [§3.4, Fig. 2 caption] The caption repeats '(c,g)' for both type-II and type-III; the type-III entry should refer to '(d,h)'.
  3. [§3.4] The sentence 'Fig. 2 (b,f),with ζx = 0, Corresponds to the original dirac cone' is incorrect: the untilted case is panel (a,e), not (b,f).
  4. [Eq. (3.18)] The retarded Green's function in Eq. (3.18) requires an iε prescription to define the square root and the correct branch for the retarded response; the paper does not specify it, which is relevant for the spectral function shape.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typos: 'witch' should be 'which', 'indepent' should be 'independent', 'Hoever' should be 'However', 'duo to' should be 'due to', and 'metalic' should be 'metallic'.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The tilted spectral cone and the tilt-independent Chern number are the input tilt rewritten as a frequency shift; the conductivity calculation is the only substantially independent result.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 2, Eqs. (2.4)-(2.5); Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.4); Sec. 3.3-3.4, Eqs. (3.12), (3.18)-(3.19)]
    "From this, we can read off the vielbein fields of Dirac fermion [16]: e^μ_a = [[1,ζx,ζy,ζz],[0,1,0,0],[0,0,1,0],[0,0,0,1]]. ... Since the cone is the locus of the zero of the denominator, it is evident that the tilting parameter ζx induces a rotation in (ω,kx) plane with the tilting angle tanθ=ζx."

    The tilt is introduced into the boundary vielbein e^μ_a, which was constructed to reproduce the tilted Dirac dispersion ω = ζx kx ± |k| of the input Hamiltonian (2.2). This same vielbein is imposed as the boundary condition on the bulk vielbein, and in the pure-AdS limit f=1 the Dirac equation (3.12) reduces to the standard AdS5 problem with ω shifted by ζx kx. The closed-form Green's function (3.18) is therefore the standard massless AdS5 result with that shift, and the spectral cone (3.19) is exactly the zero locus of the shifted denominator. Thus the 'confirmation' of a tilted Dirac cone is the input tilt repackaged in holographic coordinates, not an emergent prediction of holography.

  2. renaming known result [Sec. 3.6, Eqs. (3.22)-(3.29)]
    "The corresponding normalized eigenvectors |n1⟩,|n2⟩ are independent of ζx. ... Note that the result is independent of ζx showing the semi-universal character of the Berry curvature, whose integration gives a true topological number."

    The Green's function (3.18) depends on frequency only through Ω = ω + ζx kx, and the tilt enters the topological Hamiltonian (3.26) only as the unit-matrix term ζx kx σ0. Such a term cannot change the eigenvectors of k·σ, and the ω-integral in the Berry-flux formula (3.23) is invariant under the shift ω → Ω. Consequently, the ζx-independence of the Chern number is an identity inherited from the input shift structure, not a new strong-coupling or holographic result; it is the standard Dirac-cone topology restated in tilted coordinates.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 4.2]
    "According to [30], such Yukawa coupling impart special features to Dirac cone depending on what symmetry is broken, and it gives same features to tilted Dirac cone."

    The section's claims about gapping, flat bands, and topological liquid in the tilted background are not derived in this paper. The text refers to the authors' own earlier work [30] and asserts without calculation that the same features appear for tilted cones ('it gives same features'). Thus the section's conclusions rest on a self-citation plus an unproven transfer assumption. This is secondary to the paper's main results but still load-bearing for the symmetry-breaking part of the paper.

full rationale

The paper is transparent that the tilt enters through the boundary vielbein, so one could read the construction as a consistency check rather than an emergent prediction. Nevertheless, for the two central claims of the abstract—the tilted Dirac cone in the spectral function and the ζx-independent Chern number—the paper exhibits a closed-form Green's function (3.18) that is exactly the standard massless AdS5 fermion result with ω replaced by ω + ζx kx. The spectral cone (3.19) is the zero locus of this shifted denominator, i.e., the input dispersion of Eq. (2.2); the Chern-number independence follows because the shift drops out of the ω-integral and because ζx kx σ0 does not alter the k·σ eigenvectors. Both reduce to the input shift by construction, which supports score 6. The optical-conductivity computation is a separate numerical result and is not circular, though its ζx > 1 regime raises a correctness concern (spacelike boundary time, imaginary uH) rather than a circularity. Section 4.2 additionally leans on the authors' own [30] for symmetry-breaking outcomes, but that is a secondary, non-central use. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the bulk ansatz is cited from [21], not from a self-citation chain, so the paper does not rise to an 8 or 10.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced. The only new structure is the tilted bulk metric, which is taken from prior work and asserted to solve the Einstein equations. The free parameters are the tilt itself, the fermion mass, and the undocumented matching parameters Bx and scale used in the experimental comparison.

free parameters (4)
  • Tilting parameter ζ_x (and ζ_y in the experimental comparison) = 0.5, 1.5, 1.8 in the model; 0.71 and 0.78 for photonic orbital graphene
    The tilt is an input parameter of the model, not derived from the holographic dynamics. In Section 3.5, ζ_y is extracted from the experimental hopping ratio β.
  • Holographic fermion mass m = 0, 1/8, 1/2
    The mass is tuned in Figure 4 to make the spectrum sharper, and m=1/2 is chosen in Section 3.5 for the experimental comparison. This is a free parameter fitted to reproduce the observed spectral shape.
  • Shifting parameter Bx = not defined in the text
    Mentioned in Section 3.5 as a parameter used to match the holographic spectrum to the experimental POG data. No definition, equation, or value is provided.
  • Proper scale for the experimental comparison = not specified
    Section 3.5 states that a 'proper scale' is used to align the holographic spectrum with the arbitrary axes of the experimental plot; this is an unquantified fitting liberty.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The bulk metric (3.4) with f(u)=1-(u/uH)^4 and uH=√(1-ζ_x²)/(πT) solves the vacuum Einstein equations.
    The paper states that f(u) 'can be determined from the Einstein equation' but does not show the equations or the derivation. All fermion and conductivity results depend on this background.
  • domain assumption The tilted Dirac cone in the boundary field theory is represented by Volovik's vielbein (2.5) and the boundary metric (3.3), i.e., a Galilean boost of Minkowski spacetime.
    This is adopted from Volovik and Moradpouri et al., not derived in the paper. It defines what 'tilt' means in the holographic dictionary.
  • domain assumption The topological Hamiltonian method H_t(k) = -G^{-1}(0,k) is a valid way to define the Chern number for the strongly interacting holographic fermions.
    Used in Section 3.6 to extract eigenvectors and Berry curvature. The paper does not verify that the method remains valid for the type-II (overtilted) case where the Green's function has additional structure.
  • domain assumption The generalized Berry flux formula (3.21) can be evaluated as a formal integral over all frequencies, with the retarded Green's function, even when the tilt is overtilted.
    The integral is taken over ω from -∞ to ∞. For ζ_x>1, the Fermi surface becomes a nodal line and the analytic structure changes, but this is not examined.
  • ad hoc to paper The photonic orbital graphene experiment of [31] can be described by the holographic model with a simple tilt parameter and a tunable fermion mass.
    Section 3.5 matches the experimental spectrum by choosing m=1/2, an undefined 'Bx', and a 'proper scale'. This is a fitting procedure, not a parameter-free prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tilted Dirac cones and their topology in Holographic Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HKNHQSUS

@misc{pith2026250903033,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tilted Dirac cones and their topology in Holographic Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HKNHQSUS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03033}
}
read the original abstract

We explore strongly correlated materials with tilted Dirac cone by introducing a method to realize this spectral feature within a holographic setup. Following the work by Moradpouri et al., we construct an asymptotically AdS spacetime by uplifting the vielbein of Volovik et al to tilt the flat spacetime light cone. We then couple the resulting metric to holographic fermions and compute their spectral functions, confirming the presence of a tilted Dirac cone in momentum space. We also calculate the topological number using the holographic Green's function and find that the Chern number is independent of the tilting parameter. Additionally, we show that the optical conductivity exhibits a Drude peak even at zero chemical potential, revealing nontrivial strong-coupling effects absent in field-theoretic models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A.B.-S. T.O. Wehling and A. Balatsky, Dirac materials, Advances in Physics 63 (2014) 1 [ https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2014.927109]

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Crossno, J.K

    J. Crossno, J.K. Shi, K. Wang, X. Liu, A. Harzheim, A. Lucas et al., Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene , Science 351 (2016) 1058 [ 1509.04713]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Y. Seo, G. Song, P. Kim, S. Sachdev and S.-J. Sin, Holography of the Dirac Fluid in Graphene with two currents , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 036601 [ 1609.03582]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Y. Seo, G. Song, C. Park and S.-J. Sin, Small Fermi Surfaces and Strong Correlation Effects in Dirac Materials with Holography , JHEP 10 (2017) 204 [ 1708.02257]. – 18 –

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Y. Seo, G. Song and S.-J. Sin, Strong Correlation Effects on Surfaces of Topological Insulators via Holography, Phys. Rev. B96 (2017) 041104 [ 1703.07361]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Katayama, A

    S. Katayama, A. Kobayashi and Y. Suzumura, Pressure-induced zero-gap semiconducting state in organic conductor α-(bedt-ttf) 2i3 salt , Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 75 (2006) 054705

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    X.-F. Zhou, X. Dong, A.R. Oganov, Q. Zhu, Y. Tian and H.-T. Wang, Semimetallic two-dimensional boron allotrope with massless dirac fermions , Physical Review Letters 112 (2014) 085502

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Goerbig, J.-N

    M. Goerbig, J.-N. Fuchs, G. Montambaux and F. Pi´ echon,Tilted anisotropic dirac cones in quinoid-type graphene and α-(bedt-ttf) 2 i 3 , Physical Review B 78 (2008) 045415

    work page 2008

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Tajima, S

    N. Tajima, S. Sugawara, M. Tamura, Y. Nishio and K. Kajita, Electronic phases in an organic conductor α-(bedt-ttf) 2i3: Ultra narrow gap semiconductor, superconductor, metal, and charge-ordered insulator, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 75 (2006) 051010

    2006

  2. [10]

    Kobayashi, S

    A. Kobayashi, S. Katayama, Y. Suzumura and H. Fukuyama, Massless fermions in organic conductor, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 76 (2007) 034711

    2007

  3. [11]

    Tajima and K

    N. Tajima and K. Kajita, Experimental study of organic zero-gap conductor α-(bedt-ttf) 2i3, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Kobayashi, S

    A. Kobayashi, S. Katayama and Y. Suzumura, Theoretical study of the zero-gap organic conductor α-(bedt-ttf) 2i3, Science and Technology of Advanced Materials (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Isobe, Theoretical Study on Correlation Effects in Topological Matter , Springer (2017)

    H. Isobe, Theoretical Study on Correlation Effects in Topological Matter , Springer (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Kajita, Y

    K. Kajita, Y. Nishio, N. Tajima, Y. Suzumura and A. Kobayashi, Molecular dirac fermion systems—theoretical and experimental approaches—, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 83 (2014) 072002

    2014

  7. [15]

    Volovik, Black hole and hawking radiation by type-ii weyl fermions , JETP letters 104 (2016) 645

    G.E. Volovik, Black hole and hawking radiation by type-ii weyl fermions , JETP letters 104 (2016) 645

    2016

  8. [16]

    Volovik, Type-ii weyl semimetal versus gravastar , JETP Letters 114 (2021) 236

    G.E. Volovik, Type-ii weyl semimetal versus gravastar , JETP Letters 114 (2021) 236

    2021

  9. [17]

    Farajollahpour, Z

    T. Farajollahpour, Z. Faraei and S. Jafari, Solid-state platform for space-time engineering: The 8 p m m n borophene sheet , Physical Review B 99 (2019) 235150

    2019

  10. [18]

    Jafari, Electric field assisted amplification of magnetic fields in tilted dirac cone systems, Physical Review B 100 (2019) 045144

    S. Jafari, Electric field assisted amplification of magnetic fields in tilted dirac cone systems, Physical Review B 100 (2019) 045144

    2019

  11. [19]

    Farajollahpour and S

    T. Farajollahpour and S. Jafari, Synthetic non-abelian gauge fields and gravitomagnetic effects in tilted dirac cone systems , Physical Review Research 2 (2020) 023410. – 19 –

    2020

  12. [20]

    Weststr¨ om and T

    A. Weststr¨ om and T. Ojanen,Designer curved-space geometry for relativistic fermions in weyl metamaterials , Physical Review X 7 (2017) 041026

    2017

  13. [21]

    Moradpouri, S

    A. Moradpouri, S. Jafari and M. Torabian, Holographic hydrodynamics of tilted dirac materials, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (2023) 1

    2023

  14. [22]

    Blake and D

    M. Blake and D. Tong, Universal Resistivity from Holographic Massive Gravity , Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 106004 [ 1308.4970]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Donos and J.P

    A. Donos and J.P. Gauntlett, Novel metals and insulators from holography , JHEP 06 (2014) 007 [ 1401.5077]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Katsnelson and A

    M.I. Katsnelson and A. Fasolino, Graphene as a prototype crystalline membrane , Accounts of chemical research 46 (2013) 97

    2013

  17. [25]

    Novoselov, A.K

    K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I. Grigorieva et al., Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene , nature 438 (2005) 197

    2005

  18. [26]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H.L. Stormer and P. Kim, Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene , nature 438 (2005) 201

    2005

  19. [27]

    Ahn, Topological enhancement of nonlinear transport in unconventional point-node semimetals, Physical Review B 107 (2023) L201112

    J. Ahn, Topological enhancement of nonlinear transport in unconventional point-node semimetals, Physical Review B 107 (2023) L201112

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. Byun, T. Yuk and S.-J. Sin, Symmetric tensor coupling in holographic mean-field theory: Deformed dirac cones , 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Iqbal and H

    N. Iqbal and H. Liu, Real-time response in AdS/CFT with application to spinors , Fortsch. Phys. 57 (2009) 367 [ 0903.2596]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    E. Oh, Y. Seo, T. Yuk and S.-J. Sin, Ginzberg-landau-wilson theory for flat band, fermi-arc and surface states of strongly correlated systems , Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (2021) 1

    2021

  23. [31]

    Mili´ cevi´ c, G

    M. Mili´ cevi´ c, G. Montambaux, T. Ozawa, O. Jamadi, B. Real, I. Sagnes et al., Type-iii and tilted dirac cones emerging from flat bands in photonic orbital graphene , Physical Review X 9 (2019) 031010

    2019

  24. [32]

    Witczak-Krempa, M

    W. Witczak-Krempa, M. Knap and D. Abanin, Interacting weyl semimetals: Characterization via the topological hamiltonian and its breakdown , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 136402

    2014

  25. [33]

    Wang and S.-C

    Z. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Simplified topological invariants for interacting insulators , Physical Review X 2 (2012) 031008

    2012

  26. [34]

    Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet , Oxford University Press (2003)

    G. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet , Oxford University Press (2003)

    2003

  27. [35]

    Moradpouri, M

    M. Moradpouri, M. Mohammadi and A. Sheykhi, Optical conductivity of tilted dirac cone from holography, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136740

    2021

  28. [36]

    Kovtun and A

    P. Kovtun and A. Ritz, Universal conductivity and central charges , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 066009. – 20 –

    2008

  29. [37]

    Cremonini, B

    S. Cremonini, B. Gouteraux and L. Wulff, Holographic conductivity of zero density strange metals, JHEP 2017 063

    2017

  30. [38]

    Hou, C.-X

    J.-T. Hou, C.-X. Yan, C.-Y. Tan, Z.-Q. Li, P. Wang, H. Guo et al., Effects of spatial dimensionality and band tilting on the longitudinal optical conductivities in dirac bands, Physical Review B 108 (2023) 035407. – 21 –

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.