Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 58 references

The Spectroscopy of the 2+1 Dimensional Analog Black Hole in Photon-Fluid Model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A rotating photon-fluid analog black hole is superradiant: co-rotating low-energy phonon modes are amplified in the band between the phonon rest energy and the horizon's rotation frequency, and the greybody factor goes negative there.

desk verdict A careful exact-solution paper whose new superradiance and Hawking claims rest on approximations used outside their validity range; the QBS/scalar-cloud core is solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03099 v1 pith:OTJEXCLZ submitted 2025-09-03 gr-qc

David Senjaya , Supakchai Ponglertsakul This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords analogblackholephotonfluidsuperradiancegreybodyfactorquasiboundstatesscalarcloudsHawkingradiationConfluentHeunfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works out the low-energy spectroscopy of a (2+1)-dimensional analog black hole formed in a photon fluid, a nonlinear optical medium in which light behaves as a rotating fluid. It claims this analog system is superradiant: co-rotating phonon modes with energy between the phonon rest energy and the horizon's rotational frequency are amplified when scattered, extracting rotational energy from the vortex, just as spinning black holes are thought to do. The same exact radial solutions yield quasibound states, a tightened energy bound for stationary scalar clouds, a Hawking temperature and radiation flux, and greybody factors that turn negative in the superradiant band. A sympathetic reader would care because the photon fluid is a tabletop system where curved-spacetime phenomena like superradiance and Hawking radiation could in principle be probed in the laboratory.

What carries the argument

Three pieces carry the argument. (1) The exact radial solution of the analog massive Klein-Gordon equation in the photon-fluid metric, written in Confluent Heun functions (Eq. 29); its near-horizon ingoing/outgoing branches feed both the quasibound spectrum and the Hawking calculation. (2) The confluent Heun polynomial condition (Eq. 39), which quantizes the quasibound energies and yields the scalar-cloud resonance Re(ω) = m_ℓ Ω_H. (3) The analytic asymptotic matching (AAM) technique, joining near-horizon and far-field solutions in the overlap zone r_H << r − r_H << r_H/ω; the matched amplitudes give the amplification factor Z = |A_out/A_in|² − 1 and the greybody factor Γ = 1 − |A_out/A_in|²

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the exact radial equation (15) for the parameter values of Figs. 6–10 (e.g., ω in 0.05–0.6, ̟ = 0.08, m_ℓ = ±1) and compare the resulting reflection coefficient with the AAM formulas (94)–(95): if the amplification factor is not positive in the band ̟ < ω < m_ℓ Ω_H, or the greybody factor's sign differs from the analytic prediction at moderate ω, the central claim fails. In the lab, the counterpart test is a weak probe beam scattered off a rotating photon vortex, whose predicted signature is reflected intensity exceeding incident intensity only for co-rotating modes with

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the photon-fluid analog black hole is superradiant: phonon modes with energy in the band ̟ < ω < m_ℓ Ω_H are amplified when scattering off the rotating vortex, and the greybody factor is consequently negative for co-rotating modes in that band, both derived analytically for the first time in this model. The derivation uses exact Confluent-Heun solutions of the analog massive Klein-Gordon equation, an exact quantization condition for quasibound states, and the Damour-Ruffini continuation giving the horizon's Bose-Einstein statistics, Hawking temperature T_H = cħ/(4πk_B r_H), and flux Φ_E = Li₂(e^{4πm_ℓΩ_H})/16π². The same exact solution tightens the WKB s

Load-bearing premise

The superradiance and greybody-factor results rest on a low-frequency approximation ({ω, ̟} << 1) that guarantees an overlap region r_H << r − r_H << r_H/ω between the near-horizon and far-field solutions, a window the plotted parameter ranges do not all satisfy, with no exact numerical cross-check provided.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A tabletop experiment with a rotating photon fluid should see reflected phonon intensity exceed the incident intensity for co-rotating modes with energies in ̟ < ω < m_ℓ Ω_H, with the largest amplification at the m_ℓ = 1 mode.
  • The negative greybody factor means the Hawking spectrum emitted by the analog horizon is not a plain Planck spectrum: co-rotating low-energy modes are boosted, a measurable signature that could distinguish analog Hawking radiation from thermal noise.
  • The exact quantization condition predicts superradiant instabilities (Im ω > 0) for co-rotating quasibound states at small and intermediate spin, disappearing for Ω_H >> 1, so the analog black hole bomb effect switches on and off with spin.
  • Scalar cloud configurations are more restricted than the WKB estimate suggested: only energy ratios 1 ≤ γω ≤ 1.02749 admit stationary clouds, which constrains the search for long-lived ring modes in the vortex.
  • The analytic Hawking flux Φ_E = Li₂(e^{4πm_ℓΩ_H})/16π² gives the analog horizon's radiated power as a function of vortex angular momentum, testable across the experimentally accessible parameter range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own matching condition ({ω, ̟} << 1; Eq. 105) marks the validity window of the superradiance and greybody results; an inexpensive numerical integration of the exact radial equation (15) at the figure parameters would show whether the negative greybody factor survives at moderate frequencies or is an artifact of the low-frequency matching.
  • Because the overlap region r_H << r − r_H << r_H/ω narrows as ω grows, the predicted amplification is most robust for the longest-wavelength probe modes, so the natural experiment is a low-frequency probe beam rather than one near the rest energy.
  • The same AAM machinery should transfer to other (2+1)-dimensional analog metrics, suggesting that negative greybody factors in the superradiant band are a generic feature of rotating analog horizons rather than a peculiarity of the photon-fluid model.
  • Since the Hawking temperature depends on beam intensity and wavelength through r_H = ξ²/r₀, a single photon-fluid setup could tune the horizon temperature, and the polylog flux formula then predicts the full spin dependence of the radiated power.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a massive scalar (phonon) field on the 2+1D photon-fluid analog black hole. It derives an exact confluent-Heun radial solution, obtains quasibound-state quantization (39), a scalar-cloud energy ratio bound γω ≤ 1.02749, a Damour-Ruffini Hawking flux (65), and an AAM-based amplification factor and greybody factor (96), (106). The paper claims superradiance for ̟ < ω < mℓΩ_H and negative greybody factors for co-rotating modes in that regime.

Significance. If validated, the exact QBS and scalar-cloud bound are useful contributions, and the first analytic superradiance/greybody calculation for this analogue model would strengthen the analogy with rotating black holes. The paper is analytic, explicit, and makes falsifiable predictions for a tabletop system. However, the superradiance/greybody section currently rests on an uncontrolled low-frequency approximation, and the Hawking-flux section contains a divergence for mℓΩ_H > 0. These issues must be addressed before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6, Eqs. (101)–(105), Figs. 6, 8–10] The AAM derivation assumes {ω,̟} ≪ 1 and an overlap window r_H ≪ r − r_H ≪ r_H/ω (Eq. 105). The plotted data violate this: Fig. 6 uses ω up to 0.4 with ̟ = 0.02, and Figs. 8–10 use ω up to 0.7 with ̟ = 0.08. In Eq. (101), setting A1 ≈ 0 drops 4ω² − 3̟², which is ≈0.64 at ω = 0.4; the simplified B2 in Eq. (99) drops 6ω² − 3̟² ≈ 0.96. These are not negligible relative to the retained terms. No independent numerical integration of Eq. (66) is provided. The claimed negative greybody factors and amplification magnitudes in the plotted regime are therefore not established; please restrict the presentation to the AAM validity regime or add numerical validation.
  2. [§5, Eqs. (64)–(65), Fig. 5] The integral defining Φ_E has integrand 1/(e^{4π(ω−mℓΩ_H)} − 1), which has a pole at ω = mℓΩ_H when mℓΩ_H > 0. The Li₂ evaluation in Eq. (65) is valid only for mℓΩ_H ≤ 0. The text's statement that positive mℓ is 'complex-valued and therefore omitted' is not a derivation; the abstract's unqualified power-spectrum claim is unsupported. Please restrict the claim, use a proper chemical-potential prescription, or present the calculation only for mℓ ≤ 0 with the divergence discussed.
  3. [§5, Eqs. (62)–(63)] These equations are dimensionally inconsistent as printed: the left-hand side of Eq. (62) is dimensionless, while the right-hand side mixes a frequency ω and a chemical potential μ_H with units of inverse time; Eq. (63)'s two equalities do not match (the final expression is not equivalent to cℏ/(4πk_B r_H)). Please rewrite in consistent dimensionless variables or define the dimensionful ω separately.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (60)] The exponent e^{4π(ω−Ω_H)} appears to be missing mℓ; from Eq. (58) it should be e^{4π(ω−mℓΩ_H)}.
  2. [Eq. (53)] The approximate value √(30.68/29.06) is unexplained and dimensionally odd; either justify it or remove it.
  3. [Abstract and §5] The abstract says 'power spectrum', but Sec. 5 computes an integrated energy flux Φ_E. Please use consistent terminology.
  4. [References [22] and [23]] References [22] and [23] appear to be the same paper by Hod (Phys. Rev. D 103, 084003 (2021)); please cite once.
  5. [§7, Eq. (106)] The term 'negative greybody factor' is physically just Γ = 1 − |A_out/A_in|² < 1; consider clarifying that negative values correspond to superradiant amplification so readers do not misinterpret the sign.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central results are derived from the radial equation and standard connection formulas; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper derives the radial equation (15) from the analog Klein-Gordon equation and solves it in terms of confluent Heun functions (29), with the quantization condition (39) obtained algebraically from the Heun polynomial condition (C22). The scalar-cloud ratio bound follows by substituting the scalar-cloud resonance condition into this formula and expanding, rather than from fitting the predicted quantity. The superradiance analysis is also self-contained: the far- and near-horizon solutions (73) and (80) are constructed from Eq. (66), matched through the hypergeometric connection formulae (E46), and the amplification factor (96) is an explicit expression in the matching coefficients. The negative greybody factors in Sec. 7 are a direct corollary of the definitions (96) and (106) (Gamma = -Z), not a separately fitted input. The self-citation [24] is used only as background for the exact quasibound-state method; the present paper re-derives the relevant solution and all new claims. The stated validity condition {omega, varpi} << 1 and matching window (105) are limitations of the AAM approximation; their possible violation in some plotted regimes is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the mapping from photon-fluid to a (2+1)D analog metric, on the standard Heun polynomial condition, and on the low-frequency AAM approximation. No free parameters are fitted; all parameters (Ω_H, ̟, m_l) are model inputs.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The photon-fluid system is governed by a massive Klein-Gordon equation in a (2+1)-dimensional curved spacetime with metric (4), valid in the 1/λ^4 << 1 regime.
    Section 3, Eqs (9)-(13). The entire analysis is built on this mapping from the optical system to a relativistic scalar field in a curved metric.
  • standard math The confluent Heun function truncates to a polynomial when the parameters satisfy the quantization condition (C22).
    Appendix C, Eq (C22). This is a known property of Heun functions, but it is the basis for the exact QBS energy formula (39).
  • domain assumption The AAM matching is valid for low frequencies {ω, ̟} << 1 and requires the matching region r_H << r - r_H << r_H/ω to be non-empty (Eq (105)).
    Section 6, Eq (105). The superradiance and greybody factor results are derived in this approximation.
  • standard math The near-horizon radial solution has the form z^{±i(ω - m_lΩ_H)} and analytic continuation yields a Bose-Einstein distribution.
    Section 5, Eqs (54)-(61). This is a standard Damour-Ruffini technique, but the flux integral (65) implicitly assumes a flat-space density of states and is not justified for a curved 2+1D background.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Spectroscopy of the 2+1 Dimensional Analog Black Hole in Photon-Fluid Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OTJEXCLZ

@misc{pith2026250903099,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Spectroscopy of the 2+1 Dimensional Analog Black Hole in Photon-Fluid Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OTJEXCLZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03099}
}
abstract

In this paper, we explore quasibound states (QBS), scalar cloud, Hawking radiation, superradiance, and greybody factor of relativistic massive phonon modes in a photon-fluid rotation black hole. We investigate quasibound states and scalar clouds using exact eigensolutions to the analog Klein-Gordon equation in the analog black hole background and revisit the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) upper bound on the scalar clouds' energy ratio. Using the obtained exact radial solution, we use the Damour-Ruffini method to calculate the power spectrum of the analog black hole's Hawking radiation. We then use the analytical asymptotic matching technique (AAM) to investigate the analog black hole's superradiance for low energy massive photon scattering, resulting in the analytical amplification factor and the greybody factor formulas of the analog black hole. We discover that the analog black hole in the photon-fluid model is superradiant with an energy range of $\varpi < \omega<m_\ell\Omega_H$. As a result, the greybody factors are negative for co-rotating modes in the superradiant regime.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Senjaya, D.: Exact phonon quasibound states around an o ptical black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(4), 388 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12755-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12755-0 2024

  2. [1]

    Lei, Y.-H., Yang, Z.-H., Kuang, X.-M.: Scalar field pertu rbation around a rotating hairy black hole: quasinormal modes, quasibound states and superradiant insta- bility. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(4), 438 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052- 024-12814-6 arXiv:2310.05190 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    Siqueira, P.H.C., Richartz, M.: Quasinormal modes, qua sibound states, scalar clouds, and superradiant instabilities of a Kerr-li ke black hole. Phys. Rev. D 106(2), 024046 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024046 arXiv:2205.00556 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [3]

    Noda, S., Motohashi, H.: Spectroscopy of Kerr-AdS5 spac etime with the Heun function: Quasinormal modes, greybody factor, and eva poration. Phys. Rev. D 106(6), 064025 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.064025 arXiv:2206.07721 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  5. [4]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophy sics 40, 49–54 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2023.10.002

    Senjaya, D.: Exact analytical quasibound states of a sca lar particle around a slowly rotating black hole. Journal of High Energy Astrophy sics 40, 49–54 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2023.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2023.10.002 2023

  6. [5]

    Physics Letters B848, 138373 (2024) https://doi

    Senjaya, D.: Exact analytical quasibound states of a sca lar particle around a reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole. Physics Letters B848, 138373 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138373 30

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Annals Phys

    Senjaya, D., Ponglertsakul, S.: The extreme Reissner–N ordstr¨ om Black Hole: New exact solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation with minimal c oupling. Annals Phys. 473, 169898 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2024.169898

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [7]

    Senjaya, D., Ponglertsakul, S.: The Spectroscopy of Ker r-Einstein-Maxwell- Dilaton-Axion: Exact Quasibound States, Scalar Cloud, Hor izon’s Boson Statis- tics and Superradiance (2025) arXiv:2501.08788 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    Keshet, U., Neitzke, A.: Asymptotic spectroscopy of rot ating black holes. Phys. Rev. D 78, 044006 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044006 arXiv:0709.1532 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Mathie, A.: Black Holes and Analogy, pp. 249–276. Spring er, Cham (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Visser, M.: Survey of Analogue Spacetimes, pp. 31–50. S pringer, New York (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    Phi losophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Eng ineering Sciences 366(1877), 2905–2913 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0062

    Unruh, W.G.: Dumb holes: analogues for black holes. Phi losophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Eng ineering Sciences 366(1877), 2905–2913 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0062

    2008

  5. [12]

    Annals of Physics 413, 168064 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.168064

    Kandemir, B.S.: Hairy btz black hole and its analogue mo del in graphene. Annals of Physics 413, 168064 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.168064

    2020

  6. [13]

    Horstmann, B., Reznik, B., Fagnocchi, S., Cirac, J.I.: Hawking radiation from an acoustic black hole on an ion ring. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250403 (2010) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.250403

    2010 doi

  7. [14]

    Physical Review A - PHYS REV A 60, 4114–4121 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.4114

    Chiao, R., Boyce, J.: Bogoliubov dispersion relation a nd the possibility of super- fluidity for weakly-interacting photons in a 2d photon fluid. Physical Review A - PHYS REV A 60, 4114–4121 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.60.4114

    1999 doi

  8. [15]

    Marino, F.: Massive phonons and gravitational dynamic s in a photon-fluid model. Phys. Rev. A 100, 063825 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.063825

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Vieira, H.S., Bezerra, V.B., Muniz, C.R.: Instability of the charged massive scalar field on the Kerr–Newman black hole spacetime. Eur. Ph ys. J. C 82(10), 932 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10908-7 arXi v:2107.02562 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Physics Letters B 849, 138414 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138414

    Senjaya, D.: Exact massive and massless scalar quasibo und states around a charged lense-thirring black hole. Physics Letters B 849, 138414 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138414

    2024

  11. [19]

    Senjaya, D.: The Kerr–Bumblebee exact massive and mass less scalar quasibound 31 states and Hawking radiation. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(4), 424 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12794-7

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Senjaya, D., Burikham, P., Harko, T.: The exact relativ istic scalar quasibound states of the dyonic Kerr–Sen black hole: quantized energy, and Hawking radi- ation. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(8), 857 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052- 024-13225-3 arXiv:2405.15219 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Senjaya, D.: Exact massive and massless scalar quasibo und states solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton (EMD) black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(3), 229 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12600-4

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Hod, S.: Stationary scalar clouds supported by rapidly -rotating acoustic black holes in a photon-fluid model. Phys. Rev. D 103, 084003 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084003

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Hod, S.: Stationary scalar clouds supported by rapidly -rotating acoustic black holes in a photon-fluid model. Phys. Rev. D 103(8), 084003 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.084003 arXiv:2102.02215 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Damour, T., Ruffini, R.: Black-hole evaporation in the kl ein-sauter-heisenberg- euler formalism. Phys. Rev. D 14, 332 (1976)

    1976

  17. [26]

    Nature 468(7323), 545–548 (2010) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nature09567

    Klaers, J., Schmitt, J., Vewinger, F., Weitz, M.: Bose– einstein condensation of photons in an optical microcavity. Nature 468(7323), 545–548 (2010) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nature09567

    2010 doi

  18. [27]

    Carusotto, I., Ciuti, C.: Quantum fluids of light. Rev. M od. Phys. 85, 299–366 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.299

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    photon fluid

    Marino, F.: Acoustic black holes in a two-dimensional “ photon fluid” . Physical Review A 78(6) (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.78.063804

    2008 doi

  20. [29]

    Optica 5(9), 1099–1103 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA

    Vocke, D., Maitland, C., Prain, A., Wilson, K.E., Bianc alana, F., Wright, E.M., Marino, F., Faccio, D.: Rotating black hole geometries in a t wo-dimensional pho- ton superfluid. Optica 5(9), 1099–1103 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA. 5.001099

    2018 doi

  21. [30]

    Unive rse 9(5), 205 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9050205 arXiv:2107.02065 [gr-qc]

    Vieira, H.S.: Quasibound States, Stability and Wave Fu nctions of the Test Fields in the Consistent 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet Gravity. Unive rse 9(5), 205 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9050205 arXiv:2107.02065 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Huang, Y., Zhang, H.: Quasibound states of charged dila tonic black holes. Phys. Rev. D 103(4), 044062 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044062 32 arXiv:2012.12778 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Yang, H., Miao, Y.-G.: Superradiance of massive scalar particles around rotating regular black holes*. Chin. Phys. C 47(7), 075101 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1088/1674-1137/accdc7 arXiv:2211.15130 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Liu, Q.-X., Hu, Y.-P., Sui, T.-T., An, Y.-S.: Superradi ance of rotating black holes surrounded by dark matter. Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101624 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101624 arXiv:2406.04611 [gr-qc]

    2024

  25. [34]

    Santos, N.M., Herdeiro, C.A.R.: Black holes, stationa ry clouds and magnetic fields. Phys. Lett. B 815, 136142 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021. 136142 arXiv:2102.04989 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Garc ´ ıa, G., Salgado, M.: Regular scalar charged cloud s around a reissner- nordstrom black hole and no-hair theorems. Phys. Rev. D 104, 064054 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.064054

    2021 doi

  27. [36]

    Richartz, M., Rosa, J.a.L., Berti, E.: Bounds on the mas s of superradiantly unstable scalar fields around Kerr black holes (2024) arXiv:2405.01003 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Herdeiro, C.A.R., Radu, E.: Kerr black holes with scala r hair. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 221101 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.221101 arXiv:1403.2757 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Furuhashi, H., Nambu, Y.: Instability of massive scala r fields in Kerr-Newman space-time. Prog. Theor. Phys. 112, 983–995 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1143/ PTP.112.983 arXiv:gr-qc/0402037

    2004 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Hod, S.: Stationary resonances of rapidly-rotating Ke rr black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C 73(4), 2378 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2378-x arXiv:1311.5298 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [40]

    : Kerr-Newman scalar clouds

    Benone, C.L., Crispino, L.C.B., Herdeiro, C., Radu, E. : Kerr-Newman scalar clouds. Phys. Rev. D 90(10), 104024 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 90.104024 arXiv:1409.1593 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Huang, Y., Liu, D.-J.: Scalar clouds and the superradia nt instability regime of Kerr-Newman black hole. Phys. Rev. D 94(6), 064030 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.94.064030 arXiv:1606.08913 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Detweiler, S.L.: KLEIN-GORDON EQUATION AND ROTATING B LACK HOLES. Phys. Rev. D 22, 2323–2326 (1980) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 22.2323

    1980 doi

  34. [43]

    Khodadi, M., Pourkhodabakhshi, R.: Lifetime of scalar cloud formation around a rotating regular black hole. Phys. Rev. D 106(8), 084047 (2022) https://doi. 33 org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.084047 arXiv:2210.06861 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Hod, S.: No-short scalar hair theorem for spinning acou stic black holes in a photon-fluid model. Phys. Rev. D 104(10), 104041 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.104.104041 arXiv:2202.00688 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Frank W. J. Olver, R.F.B. Daniel W. Lozier, Clark, C.W.: NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 1st edn. Cambridge University P ress, Cambridge (2010)

    2010

  37. [46]

    Sakalli, I.: Analytical solutions in rotating linear d ilaton black holes: res- onant frequencies, quantization, greybody factor, and Haw king radiation. Phys. Rev. D 94(8), 084040 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084040 arXiv:1606.00896 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Other the sis (2003)

    Musiri, S.: Aspects of black hole scattering. Other the sis (2003)

    2003

  39. [48]

    Brito, R., Cardoso, V., Pani, P.: Superradiance: New Fr ontiers in Black Hole Physics. Lect. Notes Phys. 906, 1–237 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 19000-6 arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Page, D.N.: Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: M assless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole. Phys. Rev. D 13, 198–206 (1976) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198

    1976 doi

  41. [50]

    Starobinsky, A.A.: Amplification of waves reflected fro m a rotating ”black hole” . Sov. Phys. JETP 37(1), 28–32 (1973)

    1973

  42. [51]

    Franzin, E., Liberati, S., Oi, M.: Superradiance in Ker r-like black holes. Phys. Rev. D 103(10), 104034 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104034 arXiv:2102.03152 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Braidotti, M.C., Faccio, D., Wright, E.M.: Penrose Sup erradiance in Nonlin- ear Optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(19), 193902 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.125.193902 arXiv:2007.07766 [physics.optics]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Annals Phys

    Sharif, M., Raza, A.: Greybody factor for a static spher ically symmetric black hole with non-linear electrodynamics. Annals Phys. 442, 168920 (2022) https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.168920 arXiv:2206.01185 [gr-qc]

    2022

  45. [54]

    Javed, F., Mumtaz, S., Raza, A., Almutairi, B., Mustafa , G., Fatima, G.: Grey- body factor of uncharged black hole in symmetric teleparall el gravity. Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101656 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101656

    2024

  46. [55]

    Harmark, T., Natario, J., Schiappa, R.: Greybody Facto rs for d-Dimensional Black Holes. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14(3), 727–794 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 4310/ATMP.2010.v14.n3.a1 arXiv:0708.0017 [hep-th] 34

    2010 arXiv

  47. [56]

    JHEP 06, 041 (2019) https:// doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)041 arXiv:1901.10828 [gr-qc]

    Hyun, Y.-H., Kim, Y., Park, S.C.: Exact Greybody Factor s for the Brane Scalar Field of Five-dimensional Rotating Black Holes. JHEP 06, 041 (2019) https:// doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)041 arXiv:1901.10828 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Tata Mcgraw hill, New delhi (1991)

    Simmons, G.F.: Differential Equations with Applicatio n and Historical Notes, 2nd edn. Tata Mcgraw hill, New delhi (1991)

    1991

  49. [58]

    C larendon Press, Oxford (1995)

    Ronveaux, A.: Heun’s Differential Equations, 1st edn. C larendon Press, Oxford (1995)

    1995

  50. [59]

    Dover books on math- ematics

    Bell, W.W.: Special Functions for Scientists and Engin eers. Dover books on math- ematics. Dover Publications, Massachusetts (2004). https://books.google.co.th/ books?id=Jj5pXGTZIKkC 35

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.