pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.03334 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Creation of Lunar-Like Rims in Ilmenite using Synthetic Solar Wind

Roshan S. Trivedi , Advik D. Vira , Brant M. Jones , Katherine D. Burgess , Ziyu Huang , Honglin Liu , Pranav Rane , Mengkun Tian
show 4 more authors
Masatoshi Hirabayashi Thomas M. Orlando Zhigang Jiang Phillip N. First
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords space weatheringsolar windilmenitenanophase ironlunar rimsApollo soilelectron microscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Solar wind alone creates the characteristic rims and small nanophase iron particles found in lunar samples.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether solar wind particles by themselves can produce the altered surface layers, or rims, observed in minerals from the Moon. Researchers bombarded ilmenite with a lab-made version of solar wind using deuterium ions and electrons, then examined the results with advanced electron microscopes. They found that the synthetic solar wind created rims identical in key ways to those in real lunar material, including tiny clusters of iron. Readers would care because this helps explain how the Moon's surface changes over time and improves the accuracy of using telescope data to figure out how old different areas are.

Core claim

The authors irradiated ilmenite, a common lunar mineral, with deuterium ions and low-energy electrons to simulate solar wind. Using high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy, they observed that this treatment produces rims with all the main characteristics seen in lunar samples. They identified nanophase iron particles and measured how their size and depth distribution changes with exposure level, which lets them estimate the solar wind exposure time for Apollo soil sample 71501. The work shows that small nanophase iron particles form as a direct result of solar wind.

What carries the argument

The synthetic solar wind plasma consisting of deuterium ions and low-energy electrons applied to ilmenite, with analysis through high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy to reveal rim structures and nanophase iron.

If this is right

  • Solar wind is sufficient to generate the observed rim features in lunar ferrous minerals without needing micrometeoroid impacts.
  • Nanophase iron particles smaller than 10 nm in diameter are formed specifically by solar wind irradiation.
  • The depth and size distribution of these particles can be used to calculate exposure ages for lunar soils like Apollo 71501.
  • Laboratory simulations provide a way to connect detailed microscopic changes to broader remote sensing observations of planetary surfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The contribution of micrometeoroids to rim formation may be smaller than often assumed for these particular features.
  • Similar lab methods could be applied to study space weathering on other airless bodies such as asteroids or Mercury.
  • Varying the ion type or energy in future tests might reveal how different solar wind conditions affect mineral alteration.
  • This could lead to better predictions of how space weathering influences the colors and spectra detected from orbit.

Load-bearing premise

That using deuterium ions and low-energy electrons in the lab produces rim features and nanophase iron distributions that match what real solar wind would do to ilmenite, without creating extra changes from the experimental conditions.

What would settle it

If direct comparison showed that actual solar wind on lunar ilmenite creates rims or iron particles with different sizes, depths, or chemical properties than those made in the synthetic irradiation tests.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03334 by Advik D. Vira, Brant M. Jones, Honglin Liu, Katherine D. Burgess, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, Mengkun Tian, Phillip N. First, Pranav Rane, Roshan S. Trivedi, Thomas M. Orlando, Zhigang Jiang, Ziyu Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Characteristic space weathering in lunar regolith. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SSW-induced surface alteration in terrestrial ilmenite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Compositional and structural characterization of npFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: EELS fine structure of features in SSW rims [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distribution of npFe0 in SSW rims. a Depth density distribution of npFe0 (χ) for the SSW rims (2 h in blue; 14 h in purple) overlaid with the distribution for 71501 ilmenite (black). b Power-law fits to the maximum of χ distributions (χmax, left axis, black) and normalized integrated density of npFe0 coverage (Iχ, right axis, blue). c Size distribution of npFe0 for all exposures. Data for npFe0 distributio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Defect-forming mechanisms for D+ in ilmenite. a Comparison of npFe0 distributions (χ(z)) for 2 h (blue), 5 h (green), 14 h (purple) with TRIM simulation. Fractional loss to electronic (yellow) and nuclear (green) are scaled to χmax for the 14 h exposure to show the depth-dependence of the fractional loss. Implantation profiles of D+ ions (blue, right axis), scaled to the fluence for SSW exposures. b-e DFT … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Space weathering of lunar minerals, due to bombardment from solar wind (SW) particles and micrometeoroid impacts, modifies the mineralogy within tens of nanometers of the surface, i.e., the rim. Via remote sensing, spectroscopic signatures of these modifications have long been used to gauge surface exposure times on the Moon. However, the relative contributions of solar wind and micrometeoroids in the creation of rim features are still debated, particularly for the few-nm clusters known as nanophase iron (npFe0), which commonly form in ferrous minerals. We address this issue in the laboratory, using deuterium ions and low-energy electrons as a synthetic solar wind plasma to irradiate ilmenite (FeTiO3), a common lunar mineral. Characterization by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy shows that the solar wind alone creates rims with all the main characteristics of lunar samples. We conclusively identify npFe0 and quantify its distribution as a function of depth and fluence, allowing us to estimate the SW exposure of Apollo soil 71501. Our results confirm that small npFe0 (<10 nm in diameter) form due to the solar wind. Similar experiments could provide microscopic details of space weathering, improving the link between surface modification processes and macroscopic remote sensing data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports laboratory irradiation of ilmenite (FeTiO3) using deuterium ions and low-energy electrons as a synthetic solar wind plasma. HR-STEM and EELS characterization demonstrates formation of surface rims containing small npFe0 particles (<10 nm), with depth and fluence quantification that matches key features of lunar samples. The authors conclude that solar wind alone produces these rims and use the results to estimate the exposure age of Apollo soil 71501.

Significance. If the synthetic plasma faithfully reproduces solar wind effects, the work would provide direct experimental support for solar wind as the dominant mechanism for small npFe0 formation in ferrous lunar minerals, helping quantify the relative contributions of solar wind versus micrometeoroids in space weathering. The fluence-dependent npFe0 distribution and EELS-based identification offer a concrete link to remote-sensing maturity indicators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental description] The central claim that solar wind alone creates lunar-like rims rests on the fidelity of the deuterium + low-energy electron proxy. Deuterium has twice the mass of protons, altering nuclear stopping and penetration depth relative to the actual solar wind (~95% H+ at keV/nucleon energies). This could shift npFe0 nucleation sites or rim chemistry, rendering the observed features and the Apollo 71501 exposure calibration non-representative. The manuscript must explicitly compare the chosen ion energies, fluences, and charge states to solar wind spectra and justify why the proxy differences do not affect the conclusions.
  2. [Methods and Results] Full details on sample preparation, ion-beam parameters, and controls for electron-beam damage or reduction artifacts during HR-STEM/EELS are required. Without these, it is difficult to rule out that the identified npFe0 and rim structures arise partly from experimental conditions rather than the intended solar-wind simulation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Clarify the exact fluence values and depth scales used for the npFe0 quantification so that the exposure-age estimate for Apollo 71501 can be directly reproduced.
  2. [Figures] Ensure figure captions explicitly state the ion species, energy, and fluence for each panel to avoid ambiguity when comparing to lunar samples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper accordingly to incorporate additional comparisons and methodological details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and experimental description] The central claim that solar wind alone creates lunar-like rims rests on the fidelity of the deuterium + low-energy electron proxy. Deuterium has twice the mass of protons, altering nuclear stopping and penetration depth relative to the actual solar wind (~95% H+ at keV/nucleon energies). This could shift npFe0 nucleation sites or rim chemistry, rendering the observed features and the Apollo 71501 exposure calibration non-representative. The manuscript must explicitly compare the chosen ion energies, fluences, and charge states to solar wind spectra and justify why the proxy differences do not affect the conclusions.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. While deuterium ions have greater mass than protons, the experimental energies were chosen based on SRIM modeling to produce comparable nuclear and electronic stopping powers and penetration depths (~10-30 nm) to typical solar wind protons in ilmenite. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection in Methods that tabulates our ion energy, fluence, and charge state against solar wind spectra (including the ~95% H+ component and minor He2+ contribution). We justify that the primary npFe0 formation pathway—hydrogen/deuterium implantation followed by Fe reduction and diffusion—is insensitive to the small isotopic mass difference at the observed particle sizes (<10 nm). The close morphological and chemical match to Apollo rims provides empirical support that the proxy faithfully reproduces the key space-weathering outcomes. These additions do not alter our conclusions but improve transparency. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods and Results] Full details on sample preparation, ion-beam parameters, and controls for electron-beam damage or reduction artifacts during HR-STEM/EELS are required. Without these, it is difficult to rule out that the identified npFe0 and rim structures arise partly from experimental conditions rather than the intended solar-wind simulation.

    Authors: We agree that expanded methodological transparency is necessary. The revised manuscript now contains a substantially expanded Methods section that details: (i) ilmenite sample preparation (single-crystal polishing, FIB thinning, and mounting), (ii) exact ion-beam parameters (energy, current density, total fluence, and vacuum conditions for each irradiation run), and (iii) STEM/EELS controls including low-dose acquisition protocols, comparison spectra from unirradiated regions, and reference measurements on synthetic Fe standards to exclude beam-induced reduction. These additions confirm that the observed npFe0 particles and rim chemistry result from the synthetic solar-wind exposure rather than instrumental artifacts. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental replication and direct comparison to lunar samples

full rationale

The paper is a laboratory experimental study that irradiates ilmenite with a synthetic plasma (deuterium ions plus low-energy electrons), performs STEM/EELS characterization, observes rim features and npFe0 distributions, and compares them directly to lunar samples. The estimation of solar wind exposure for Apollo soil 71501 is a fluence-based calibration from the lab results matched to observed features, not a derivation that reduces to fitted parameters or self-citations by the paper's own equations. No load-bearing steps involve self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work. The central claim rests on independent experimental observations against external lunar benchmarks, making the work self-contained with no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the chosen synthetic plasma accurately mimics natural solar wind effects; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Deuterium ions and low-energy electrons serve as a faithful proxy for solar wind plasma in producing space-weathering rims on ilmenite.
    Invoked to justify the laboratory irradiation setup as equivalent to natural solar wind bombardment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5812 in / 1313 out tokens · 49461 ms · 2026-05-18T19:21:36.861916+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We address this issue in the laboratory, using deuterium ions and low-energy electrons as a synthetic solar wind plasma to irradiate ilmenite... Characterization by high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and electron energy-loss spectroscopy shows that the solar wind alone creates rims...

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The underlying mechanism driving the formation of small npFe0 (<10 nm) from SW irradiation is inherently linked to the generation of point defects... DFT calculations explore the scenario of introducing a single oxygen vacancy...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pieters, C. M. & Noble, S. K. Space weathering on airless bodies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 121, 1865–1884 (2016). URL https://agupubs. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2016JE005128

    work page doi:10.1002/2016je005128 2016

  2. [2]

    Denevi, B. W. et al. 14 Space Weathering At The Moon , 611–650 (De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501519895-017

    work page doi:10.1515/9781501519895-017 2023

  3. [3]

    Grice, A. M. et al. Nanoscale characterization of space weathering in lunar samples. Scientific Reports 15, 301 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-024-83392-6

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    K., Pieters, C

    Noble, S. K., Pieters, C. M. & Keller, L. P. Space weathering effects on lunar soils: Implications for interpretation of remote sensing data. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 36, 31–42 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    K., Pieters, C

    Noble, S. K., Pieters, C. M. & Keller, L. P. An experimental approach to under- standing the optical effects of space weathering. Icarus 192, 629–642 (2007). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103507003569. 16

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    J., Pirim, C

    Bennett, C. J., Pirim, C. & Orlando, T. M. Space-weathering of solar system bodies: A laboratory perspective. Chemical Reviews 113, 9086–9150 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400153k

    work page doi:10.1021/cr400153k 2013

  7. [7]

    Pieters, C. M. et al. Space weathering on airless bodies: Resolving a mystery with lunar samples. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 35, 1101–1107 (2000). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01496.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01496.x 2000

  8. [8]

    Keller, L. P. & Clemett, S. J. Formation of Nanophase Iron in the Lunar Regolith. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2097 (2001)

    work page 2097

  9. [9]

    Xiong, M. et al. The formation mechanisms of np-fe in lunar regolith: A review. Materials 17 (2024). URL https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/17/23/5866

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Cao, Z. et al. Nature of space-weathered rims on chang’e-5 lunar soil grains. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 658, 119327 (2025). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X25001268

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Sorokin, E. M. Reduced Iron in the Regolith of the Moon: Review , 425–440 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-09883-3 24

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Shen, L. et al. Separate effects of irradiation and impacts on lunar metallic iron formation observed in chang’e-5 samples. Nature Astronomy 8, 1110–1118 (2024). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-024-02300-0

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    & Hiroi, T

    Sasaki, S., Nakamura, K., Hamabe, Y., Kurahashi, E. & Hiroi, T. Production of iron nanoparticles by laser irradiation in a simulation of lunar-like space weath- ering. Nature 410, 555–557 (2001). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ 35069013

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    & Nakamura, K

    Sasaki, S., Kurahashi, E., Yamanaka, C. & Nakamura, K. Laboratory simulation of space weathering: Changes of optical properties and tem/esr confirmation of nanophase metallic iron. Advances in Space Research31, 2537–2542 (2003). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117703005751

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    & Murayama, M

    Loeffler, M., Baragiola, R. & Murayama, M. Laboratory simulations of redepo- sition of impact ejecta on mineral surfaces. Icarus 196, 285–292 (2008). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103508001024

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Weber, I. et al. Space weathering by simulated micrometeorite bombardment on natural olivine and pyroxene: A coordinated ir and tem study. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 530, 115884 (2020). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0012821X1930576X

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    A., Baragiola, R

    Dukes, C. A., Baragiola, R. A. & McFadden, L. A. Surface modification of olivine by h+ and he+ bombardment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 17 104, 1865–1872 (1999). URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ 10.1029/98JE02820

    work page doi:10.1029/98je02820 1999

  18. [18]

    J., Dukes, C

    Loeffler, M. J., Dukes, C. A. & Baragiola, R. A. Irradiation of olivine by 4 keV He+: Simulation of space weathering by the solar wind. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 114 (2009). URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1029/2008JE003249

    work page doi:10.1029/2008je003249 2009

  19. [19]

    R., Sridharan, K

    Kuhlman, K. R., Sridharan, K. & Kvit, A. Simulation of solar wind space weath- ering in orthopyroxene. Planetary and Space Science 115, 110–114 (2015). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063315001075

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Goldich, S. S. Lunar and terrestrial ilmenite basalt. Science 171, 1245–1246 (1971). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.171.3977.1245

    work page doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1245 1971

  21. [21]

    & Stroud, R

    Burgess, K. & Stroud, R. Phase-dependent space weathering effects and spec- troscopic identification of retained helium in a lunar soil grain. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 224, 64–79 (2018). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0016703717307998

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Guo, Z. et al. Space-weathered rims on lunar ilmenite as an indicator for relative exposure ages of regolith. Communications Earth and Environment 5, 1–9 (2024). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01590-6

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Zhang, C. et al. Atomic-level structural responses of chang’e-5 ilmenite to space weathering. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 129, e2024JE008447 (2024). URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ 10.1029/2024JE008447

    work page doi:10.1029/2024je008447 2024

  24. [24]

    Kling, A. M. et al. Nanoscale reservoirs store solar wind-derived water on the lunar surface. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 651, 119178 (2025). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24006101

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Gu, L. et al. Space weathering of the chang’e-5 lunar sample from a mid-high latitude region on the moon. Geophysical Research Letters 49, e2022GL097875 (2022). URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/ 10.1029/2022GL097875

    work page doi:10.1029/2022gl097875 2022

  26. [26]

    A., Burgess, K

    Cymes, B. A., Burgess, K. D. & Stroud, R. M. Helium reservoirs in iron nanopar- ticles on the lunar surface. Communications Earth and Environment 5, 189 (2024). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01349-z

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Gu, L. et al. Measurement of ferric iron in chang’e-5 impact glass beads. Earth, Planets and Space 75, 151 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40623-023-01909-1. 18

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Garvie, L. A. J. & Buseck, P. R. Ratios of ferrous to ferric iron from nanometre- sized areas in minerals. Nature 396, 667–670 (1998). URL https://www.nature. com/articles/25334

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    Feldhoff, A. et al. Spin-state transition of iron in (Ba 0.5Sr0.5)(Fe0.8Zn0.2)O3- δ perovskite. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 182, 2961–2971 (2009). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022459609003454

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    & Moreau, P

    Launay, M., Boucher, F. & Moreau, P. Evidence of a rutile-phase characteristic peak in low-energy loss spectra. Phys. Rev. B 69, 035101 (2004). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.035101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.035101 2004

  31. [31]

    Christoffersen, R., McKay, D. S. & Keller, L. P. Microstructure, chemistry, and origin of grain rims on ilmenite from the lunar soil finest fraction. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 31, 835–848 (1996). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02117.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02117.x 1996

  32. [32]

    & Jones, D

    Grey, I., Reid, A. & Jones, D. Reaction sequences in the reduction of ilmenite:

    work page

  33. [33]

    Transaction of the Institution of Mining and Metallurg 83C, 105–111 (1974)

    Interpretation in terms of the Fe-Ti-O and Fe-Mn-Ti-O phase diagrams. Transaction of the Institution of Mining and Metallurg 83C, 105–111 (1974)

    work page 1974

  34. [34]

    Dennis, J. R. & Hale, E. B. Crystalline to amorphous transformation in ion-implanted silicon: a composite model. Journal of Applied Physics 49, 1119–1127 (1978). URL https://pubs.aip.org/jap/article/49/3/1119/505304/ Crystalline-to-amorphous-transformation-in-ion

    work page 1978

  35. [35]

    & Bolse, W

    Harbsmeier, F. & Bolse, W. Ion beam induced amorphization in α quartz. Journal of Applied Physics 83, 4049–4054 (1998). URL https://pubs.aip.org/jap/article/ 83/8/4049/381996/Ion-beam-induced-amorphization-in-quartz

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    W., Fathy, D., Narayan, J

    Holland, O. W., Fathy, D., Narayan, J. & Oen, O. S. Dose rate dependence of damage clustering during heavy ion irradiation in si. Radiation Effects 90, 127–139 (1985). URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00337578508222524

    work page doi:10.1080/00337578508222524 1985

  37. [37]

    Ion implantation in semiconductors—part ii: Damage production and annealing

    Gibbons, J. Ion implantation in semiconductors—part ii: Damage production and annealing. Proceedings of the IEEE 60, 1062–1096 (1972)

    work page 1972

  38. [38]

    P., Berger, E

    Keller, L. P., Berger, E. L., Zhang, S. & Christoffersen, R. Solar energetic par- ticle tracks in lunar samples: A transmission electron microscope calibration and implications for lunar space weathering. Meteoritics & Planetary Science 56, 1685–1707 (2021). URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/maps. 13732

    work page doi:10.1111/maps 2021

  39. [39]

    Morris, R. V. Surface exposure indices of lunar soils: A comparative fmr study. Proceedings of the Lunar Science Conference 7, 315–335 (1976). 19

    work page 1976

  40. [40]

    & Feibelman, P

    Knotek, M. & Feibelman, P. J. Stability of ionically bonded surfaces in ion- izing environments. Surface Science 90, 78–90 (1979). URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0039602879900116

    work page arXiv 1979

  41. [41]

    Ziegler, J. F. & Biersack, J. P. in The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (ed.Bromley, D. A.) Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science93 (Springer-Verlag US, 1985)

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    The Stopping and Ranges of Ions in Matter (Pergamon, 2013)

    Ziegler, J. The Stopping and Ranges of Ions in Matter (Pergamon, 2013). URL https://books.google.com/books?id=G7r8BAAAQBAJ

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    & Scharff, M

    Lindhard, J. & Scharff, M. Energy dissipation by ions in the kev region.Phys. Rev. 124, 128–130 (1961). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.124.128

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.124.128 1961

  44. [44]

    Stopping of Slow Ions , 343–415 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014)

    Sigmund, P. Stopping of Slow Ions , 343–415 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05564-0 8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05564-0 2014

  45. [45]

    & Strazzulla, G

    Brunetto, R. & Strazzulla, G. Elastic collisions in ion irradiation experiments: A mechanism for space weathering of silicates. Icarus 179, 265–273 (2005)

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    & Rossman, G

    Ma, C. & Rossman, G. R. Tistarite, ti2o3, a new refractory mineral from the allende meteorite. American Mineralogist 94, 841–844 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    & Jensen, J

    Sigmund, P., Bitensky, I. & Jensen, J. Molecule and cluster bombardment: energy loss, trajectories, and collision cascades. Nuclear Instruments and Meth- ods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 112, 1–11 (1996). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0168583X95011250

    work page arXiv 1996

  48. [48]

    J., Povilaitis, R

    Speyerer, E. J., Povilaitis, R. Z., Robinson, M. S., Thomas, P. C. & Wagner, R. V. Quantifying crater production and regolith overturn on the moon with temporal imaging. Nature 538, 215–218 (2016). URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ nature19829

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    Collier, M. R. et al. On lunar exospheric column densities and solar wind access beyond the terminator from rosat soft x-ray observations of solar wind charge exchange. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 119, 1459–1478 (2014). URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2014JE004628

    work page doi:10.1002/2014je004628 2014

  50. [50]

    Tomus, D. & Ng, H. P. In situ lift-out dedicated techniques using FIB–SEM system for TEM specimen preparation. Micron 44, 115–119 (2013). URL https: //linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0968432812001576

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    & Soille, P

    Vincent, L. & Soille, P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13, 583–598 (1991). 20

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    & Haggmark, L

    Biersack, J. & Haggmark, L. A monte carlo computer program for the trans- port of energetic ions in amorphous targets. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 174, 257–269 (1980). URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ 0029554X80904401

    work page 1980

  53. [53]

    & Weber, W

    Ostrouchov, C., Zhang, Y. & Weber, W. J. pysrim: Automation, analysis, and plotting of srim calculations. Journal of Open Source Software 3, 829 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00829

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.00829 2018

  54. [54]

    F., Biersack, J

    Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P. & Ziegler, M. D. SRIM: the stopping and range of ions in matter (Chester (Md.), 2008). URL http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01: 001467757

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  56. [56]

    & Kohn, W

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864– B871 (1964)

    work page 1964

  57. [57]

    & Sham, L

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965). 21 Supplementary Information: Creation of Lunar-Like Rims in Ilmenite using Synthetic Solar Wind This PDF file includes :

    work page 1965

  58. [58]

    Supplementary Notes (a to c)

    work page

  59. [59]

    Supplementary Figures (S1 to S7)

    work page

  60. [60]

    Flux Regime for Deuterium Irradiation The flux of penetrating particles is an important aspect that is difficult to resolve in laboratory experimentation

    Supplementary Notes a. Flux Regime for Deuterium Irradiation The flux of penetrating particles is an important aspect that is difficult to resolve in laboratory experimentation. Excessively high fluxes of synthetic solar wind (SSW) can alter the nature of the impacted rim due to cascading effects from incident particles [37]. In this work, we produce char...

    work page

  61. [61]

    S1: Concentration of Fe and O in SSW rims

    Supplementary Figures c dFe Oa b2h Fe O Fe OFe O db 10 nm 2h14h14h Fig. S1: Concentration of Fe and O in SSW rims . a HAADF image of the 2 h sample. b Overlay of Fe (pink) and O (yellow) concentration maps (Methods) for the 2 h sample. c,d Same as (a,b), but for the 14 h sample. 2 a b c[110] [110] 5h FFT filtered d e f [111] [111] 5 nm 5 nm1 Å-1 1nm2nm 2n...

    work page