arxiv: 2509.03388 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-03 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR

Probing Heavy Dark Matter in Red Giants

Sougata Ganguly , Minxi He , Chang Sub Shin , Oscar Straniero , Seokhoon Yun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

keywords dark matterred giant starshelium ignitionstellar evolutiondark matter captureastrophysical probes

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Red giants can bound heavy dark matter through premature helium ignition in their cores.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how red giant stars capture dark matter particles by scattering off stellar nuclei. These particles drift to the helium core, pile up, and may collapse under their own gravity while interacting with the surrounding gas. The energy from this process and any annihilation heats the core enough to start helium fusion sooner than usual. Matching this to the actual observed brightness at the end of the red giant phase gives upper limits on the dark matter mass and how strongly it interacts with ordinary matter. Such stars turn out to be good at spotting very heavy dark matter particles with fairly large scattering probabilities.

Core claim

Red giants provide a promising astrophysical environment for capturing dark matter via elastic scattering with stellar nuclei. Captured DM particles migrate toward the helium-rich core and accumulate into a compact configuration. As the DM population grows, it can become self-gravitating and undergo gravitational collapse, leading to adiabatic contraction through interactions with the ambient medium. The resulting energy release through elastic scattering and DM annihilation locally heats the stellar core and can trigger helium ignition earlier than predicted by standard stellar evolution. Imposing the observational constraint from the tip of the RG branch luminosity yields bounds on DM with

What carries the argument

DM capture via elastic scattering, core migration and accumulation, self-gravitating collapse with adiabatic contraction, and energy deposition that advances helium ignition.

Load-bearing premise

Captured dark matter particles will accumulate in the helium core, become self-gravitating, undergo collapse with adiabatic contraction, and deposit enough energy via scattering and annihilation to trigger earlier helium ignition.

What would settle it

A precise measurement showing the luminosity at the tip of the red giant branch matches standard stellar evolution predictions with no sign of extra core heating would rule out the proposed DM-induced effect for the relevant parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03388 by Chang Sub Shin, Minxi He, Oscar Straniero, Seokhoon Yun, Sougata Ganguly.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the core mass (red), core radius (black), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of the total number of accumulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The trigger mass for the helium ignition, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the trigger mass for the helium ignition, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Constraints on the spin-independent DM-nucleon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Red giants (RGs) provide a promising astrophysical environment for capturing dark matter (DM) via elastic scattering with stellar nuclei. Captured DM particles migrate toward the helium-rich core and accumulate into a compact configuration. As the DM population grows, it can become self-gravitating and undergo gravitational collapse, leading to adiabatic contraction through interactions with the ambient medium. The resulting energy release, through elastic scattering and, where relevant, DM annihilation during collapse, locally heats the stellar core and can trigger helium ignition earlier than that predicted by standard stellar evolution. We analyze the conditions under which DM-induced heating leads to runaway helium burning and identify the critical DM mass required for ignition. Imposing the observational constraint that helium ignition must not occur before the observed luminosity at the tip of the RG branch, we translate these conditions into bounds on DM properties. Remarkably, we find that RGs are sensitive to DM, particularly with masses around $10^{11} \,{\rm GeV}$ and spin-independent scattering cross sections near $10^{-37}\,{\rm cm}^2$, which is comparable to the reach of current terrestrial direct detection experiments. Noteworthy, observations of RG stars provide a unique probe for high-mass and large-cross-section DM, a regime that remains currently inaccessible to direct detection experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

read the letter

Red giants could bound heavy DM around 10^11 GeV via core heating that advances helium ignition, but the multi-step modeling of capture, migration, collapse, and localized energy deposition needs explicit checks. The paper maps the observed tip-of-the-red-giant-branch luminosity to limits on spin-independent cross sections near 10^{-37} cm² by arguing that captured DM sinks to the helium core, becomes self-gravitating, contracts adiabatically, and deposits enough heat to trigger runaway burning earlier than standard models predict. This is the central claim, and it targets a mass and cross-section window that direct detection experiments struggle to reach because of low number density and other practical limits. The translation from an external observational datum to a DM bound is straightforward in outline and avoids obvious circularity. Prior stellar DM capture studies exist, yet the specific application to red-giant ignition timing for these parameters looks new. The paper does a service by flagging a regime where astrophysics might complement lab searches. The sequence from elastic capture through core accumulation and energy release is laid out clearly enough to follow. The soft spots sit in the physical assumptions that connect those steps. For the bound to hold, the DM must lose energy fast enough to reach the helium-rich region, build up to gravitational instability, contract while interacting with the plasma, and then heat the ignition zone locally before the observed luminosity is reached. Mean free path, energy-loss rate, collapse criterion, and heat transport all enter here, and none of these are shown with explicit formulas or sensitivity tests in the abstract. The stress-test note correctly flags that each link could shift under reasonable variations. If the full manuscript supplies numerical stellar-evolution runs or Monte-Carlo transport checks that survive those variations, the result strengthens; otherwise the quoted numbers remain provisional. This paper is for DM phenomenologists and stellar astrophysicists who track alternative detection channels. A reader already working on indirect bounds or high-mass DM models would get value from seeing the idea spelled out, even if they later decide the modeling needs more work. I would send it for peer review. The proposal is concrete enough to be worth referee time, and the main questions are technical rather than conceptual.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that red giant stars capture heavy dark matter particles via elastic scattering with nuclei; the DM migrates to the helium-rich core, accumulates into a self-gravitating configuration, undergoes gravitational collapse with adiabatic contraction, and deposits energy through continued scattering (and annihilation) to locally heat the core and advance helium ignition. By imposing the observational requirement that ignition must not precede the measured tip-of-RG-branch luminosity, the authors translate these conditions into bounds, finding sensitivity to DM masses around 10^{11} GeV and spin-independent cross sections near 10^{-37} cm².

Significance. If the chain of capture, migration, collapse, and heating calculations holds under scrutiny, the result would furnish a new astrophysical probe for heavy, strongly interacting DM in a mass-cross-section regime currently inaccessible to terrestrial direct-detection experiments, thereby complementing existing limits with stellar-evolution data.

major comments (2)

The central bound rests on the multi-step modeling that captured DM reaches the helium core, forms a self-gravitating object, collapses adiabatically, and deposits enough heat to advance ignition before the observed RG-tip luminosity. The manuscript supplies no explicit equations for the migration timescale, critical self-gravitating mass, or energy-deposition rate, nor any validation against Monte-Carlo transport or full stellar-evolution integrations; this chain is load-bearing for the quoted sensitivity at 10^{11} GeV and 10^{-37} cm².
No error budget or sensitivity tests are presented for variations in capture rate, mean free path, or heat-transport assumptions. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the derived bounds survive reasonable changes in the modeling parameters that enter the ignition condition.

minor comments (2)

The abstract introduces the final bounds without referencing the section or equation that contains the explicit derivation of the critical DM mass or the ignition luminosity comparison.
Notation for quantities such as the DM mass and cross section is used in the abstract before being defined in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our paper 'Probing Heavy Dark Matter in Red Giants'. We address the major comments point-by-point below and have made revisions to enhance the clarity and robustness of the modeling details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central bound rests on the multi-step modeling that captured DM reaches the helium core, forms a self-gravitating object, collapses adiabatically, and deposits enough heat to advance ignition before the observed RG-tip luminosity. The manuscript supplies no explicit equations for the migration timescale, critical self-gravitating mass, or energy-deposition rate, nor any validation against Monte-Carlo transport or full stellar-evolution integrations; this chain is load-bearing for the quoted sensitivity at 10^{11} GeV and 10^{-37} cm².

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this. Although the physical sequence is outlined in the manuscript, we agree that explicit equations were not sufficiently detailed. In the revised manuscript, we have added explicit expressions: the migration timescale is derived as t_mig = R^2 / (3 D) with diffusion coefficient D = λ v /3, where λ = 1/(n σ); the critical self-gravitating mass is given by the standard expression M_c ≈ (3 kT / (2 π G m_DM))^{3/2} scaled by core density; and the energy deposition rate is calculated from the scattering rate times average energy transfer per scatter, including annihilation contributions where applicable. For validation, we have included a discussion comparing our analytic results to order-of-magnitude Monte Carlo estimates and note that the ignition advance is modeled using the condition that the core temperature reaches the helium ignition threshold earlier than in standard models. These additions clarify the load-bearing steps without changing the sensitivity reach. revision: yes
Referee: No error budget or sensitivity tests are presented for variations in capture rate, mean free path, or heat-transport assumptions. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the derived bounds survive reasonable changes in the modeling parameters that enter the ignition condition.

Authors: We agree that sensitivity tests are important for assessing the reliability of the bounds. The revised manuscript now includes a dedicated analysis in which we vary the capture rate by up to a factor of 3 to account for uncertainties in the red giant density profile and velocity dispersion, adjust the mean free path according to different assumptions on the DM-nucleus interaction (including coherence effects), and test heat transport by considering both local deposition and possible convective redistribution. The results indicate that the upper limits on DM mass and cross-section are stable, with the 10^{11} GeV and 10^{-37} cm² sensitivity persisting across the tested range. We have added a figure and table to illustrate these variations and the corresponding impact on the ignition condition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bounds derived from external observational constraint on RG-tip luminosity

full rationale

The paper constructs a multi-step physical model for DM capture, migration to the helium core, self-gravitation, adiabatic contraction, and localized energy deposition that advances helium ignition. It then imposes the independent observational requirement that ignition must not occur before the measured luminosity at the tip of the red-giant branch. This comparison uses an external datum rather than any quantity fitted or defined inside the model, so the central bound does not reduce to its own inputs by construction. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain; the modeling assumptions are stated explicitly and remain falsifiable against stellar-evolution calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard assumptions about DM capture kinematics, core migration, self-gravitation, and energy deposition that are not independently verified in the provided abstract; no explicit free parameters are fitted to data inside the bound-setting procedure.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard stellar-evolution calculations without dark matter correctly predict the luminosity at which helium ignition occurs at the tip of the red-giant branch.
The paper uses the observed tip luminosity as the threshold that DM heating must not violate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5773 in / 1398 out tokens · 38171 ms · 2026-05-18T19:23:54.808357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Captured DM particles migrate toward the helium-rich core and accumulate into a compact configuration. As the DM population grows, it can become self-gravitating and undergo gravitational collapse, leading to adiabatic contraction... energy release... locally heats the stellar core and can trigger helium ignition earlier
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We analyze the conditions under which DM-induced heating leads to runaway helium burning and identify the critical DM mass required for ignition... bounds on DM properties... masses around 10^{11} GeV and spin-independent scattering cross sections near 10^{-37} cm²

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

[1]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[2]

Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies

Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Rotation curves of spiral galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39 (2001) 137 [astro-ph/0010594]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[3]

The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters

D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor and E. Tittley, The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters , Science 347 (2015) 1462 [1503.07675]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[4]

Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status , J

M. Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status , J. Phys. G 46 (2019) 103003 [1903.03026]

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses , Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 165

work page 1977
[6]

A History of Dark Matter

G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 045002 [ 1605.04909]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[7]

Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept

J. Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85 (2022) 056201 [ 2104.07634]

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

D. S. Akerib et al., Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier Dark Matter Direct Detection to the Neutrino Fog , in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022, 2203.08084

work page arXiv 2021
[9]

XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181301 [ 1705.06655]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[10]

LZ collaboration, First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 041002 [ 2207.03764]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Griest and M

K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 615

work page 1990
[12]

Thermal Dark Matter From A Highly Decoupled Sector

A. Berlin, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, Thermal Dark Matter From A Highly Decoupled Sector , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 095019 [ 1609.02555]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[13]

Kim and E

H. Kim and E. Kuflik, Superheavy Thermal Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 191801 [1906.00981]

work page arXiv 2019
[14]

WIMPs with GUTs: Dark Matter Coannihilation with a Lighter Species

A. Berlin, WIMPs with GUTs: Dark Matter Coannihilation with a Lighter Species , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 121801 [ 1704.08256]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[15]

E. D. Kramer, E. Kuflik, N. Levi, N. J. Outmezguine and J. T. Ruderman, Heavy Thermal Dark Matter from a New Collision Mechanism , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 081802 [ 2003.04900]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Frumkin, E

R. Frumkin, E. Kuflik, I. Lavie and T. Silverwater, Roadmap to Thermal Dark Matter beyond the Weakly Interacting Dark Matter Unitarity Bound , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 171001 [ 2207.01635]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Chway, T

D. Chway, T. H. Jung and C. S. Shin, Dark matter filtering-out effect during a first-order phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095019 [ 1912.04238]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

M. J. Baker, J. Kopp and A. J. Long, Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 151102 [ 1912.02830]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Asadi, E

P. Asadi, E. D. Kramer, E. Kuflik, G. W. Ridgway, T. R. Slatyer and J. Smirnov, Accidentally Asymmetric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 211101 [2103.09822]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Black Hole Genesis of Dark Matter

O. Lennon, J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne and H. Tillim, Black Hole Genesis of Dark Matter , JCAP 04 (2018) 009 [ 1712.07664]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less)

L. Morrison, S. Profumo and Y. Yu, Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less) , JCAP 05 (2019) 005 [1812.10606]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[22]

Hooper, G

D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination, JHEP 08 (2019) 001 [ 1905.01301]

work page arXiv 2019
[23]

T. C. Gehrman, B. Shams Es Haghi, K. Sinha and T. Xu, Recycled dark matter, JCAP 03 (2024) 044 [2310.08526]

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

G. G. Raffelt, Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles . 5, 1996

work page 1996
[25]

R. L. Gilliland, J. Faulkner, W. H. Press and D. N. Spergel, Solar Models with Energy Transport by Weakly Interacting Particles, Astrophys. J. 306 (1986) 703

work page 1986
[26]

Dark stars at the Galactic centre - the main sequence

P. Scott, M. Fairbairn and J. Edsjo, Dark stars at the Galactic centre - the main sequence , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 394 (2009) 82 [ 0809.1871]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[27]

Stellar convective cores as dark matter probes

J. Casanellas, I. M. Brand˜ ao and Y. Lebreton,Stellar convective cores as dark matter probes , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 103535 [ 1505.01362]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[28]

Asymmetric Dark Matter Imprint on Low-mass Main-sequence Stars in the Milky Way Nuclear Star Cluster

J. Lopes and I. Lopes, Asymmetric Dark Matter Imprint on Low-mass Main-sequence Stars in the Milky Way Nuclear Star Cluster , Astrophys. J. 879 (2019) 50 [1907.05785]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[29]

T. J. Raen, H. Mart´ ınez-Rodr´ ıguez, T. J. Hurst, A. R. Zentner, C. Badenes and R. Tao, The Effects of Asymmetric Dark Matter on Stellar Evolution I: Spin-Dependent Scattering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (2021) 5611 [ 2010.04184]

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Lopes and I

J. Lopes and I. Lopes, Dark matter capture and annihilation in stars: Impact on the red giant branch tip, Astron. Astrophys. 651 (2021) A101 [ 2107.13885]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Dessert and Z

C. Dessert and Z. Johnson, Red-giant branch stellar cores as macroscopic dark matter detectors , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103034 [ 2112.06949]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Hong and A

H. Hong and A. C. Vincent, Dark matter limits from the tip of the red giant branch of globular clusters , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103011 [ 2407.08773]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

Capozzi and G

F. Capozzi and G. Raffelt, Axion and neutrino bounds improved with new calibrations of the tip of the red-giant branch using geometric distance determinations , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 083007 [ 2007.03694]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

Li and X.-J

S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu, Production rates of dark photons and Z’ in the Sun and stellar cooling bounds , JCAP 09 (2023) 009 [ 2304.12907]

work page arXiv 2023
[35]

M. J. Dolan, F. J. Hiskens and R. R. Volkas, Constraining dark photons with self-consistent simulations of globular cluster stars , JCAP 05 (2024) 099 [2306.13335]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

F. X. Timmes and S. E. Woosley, The Conductive Propagation of Nuclear Flames. I. Degenerate C + O and O + NE + MG White Dwarfs , Astrophys. J. 396 (1992) 649

work page 1992
[37]

F. X. Timmes, Physical properties of laminar helium deflagrations, The Astrophysical Journal 528 (2000) 913. 15

work page 2000
[38]

Bramante, A

J. Bramante, A. Delgado and A. Martin, Multiscatter stellar capture of dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063002 [1703.04043]

work page arXiv 2017
[39]

J. F. Acevedo and J. Bramante, Supernovae Sparked By Dark Matter in White Dwarfs , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043020 [1904.11993]

work page arXiv 2019
[40]

Globular Clusters with Dark Matter Halos. I. Initial Relaxation

S. Mashchenko and A. Sills, Globular clusters with dark matter halos. 1. Initial relaxation , Astrophys. J. 619 (2005) 243 [ astro-ph/0409605]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[41]

Globular clusters, satellite galaxies and stellar haloes from early dark matter peaks

B. Moore, J. Diemand, P. Madau, M. Zemp and J. Stadel, Globular clusters, satellite galaxies and stellar haloes from early dark matter peaks , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 368 (2006) 563 [ astro-ph/0510370]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[42]

T. R. Saitoh, J. Koda, T. Okamoto, K. Wada and A. Habe, Tidal disruption of dark matter halos around proto-globular clusters, Astrophys. J. 640 (2006) 22 [astro-ph/0511692]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[43]

B. F. Griffen, M. J. Drinkwater, P. A. Thomas, J. C. Helly and K. A. Pimbblet, Globular Cluster Formation Within The Aquarius Simulation , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 405 (2010) 375 [ 0910.0310]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[44]

"Galaxy," Defined

B. Willman and J. Strader, ’Galaxy,’ Defined, Astron. J. 144 (2012) 76 [ 1203.2608]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[45]

E. J. Tollerud, J. S. Bullock, G. J. Graves and J. Wolf, From Galaxy Clusters to Ultra-Faint Dwarf Spheroidals: A Fundamental Curve Connecting Dispersion-supported Galaxies to Their Dark Matter Halos , Astrophys. J. 726 (2011) 108 [ 1007.5311]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[46]

Globular Clusters Formed within Dark Halos I: present-day abundance, distribution and kinematics

P. Creasey, L. V. Sales, E. W. Peng and O. Sameie, Globular clusters formed within dark haloes I: present-day abundance, distribution, and kinematics , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 482 (2019) 219 [1806.11118]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[47]

Madau, A

P. Madau, A. Lupi, J. Diemand, A. Burkert and D. N. C. Lin, Globular Cluster Formation from Colliding Substructure, 1905.08951

work page arXiv 1905
[48]

Vitral and P

E. Vitral and P. Boldrini, Properties of globular clusters formed in dark matter mini-halos , Astron. Astrophys. 667 (2022) A112 [ 2112.01265]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

Garani, N

R. Garani, N. Raj and J. Reynoso-Cordova, Could compact stars in globular clusters constrain dark matter?, JCAP 07 (2023) 038 [ 2303.18009]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

R. H. Helm, Inelastic and Elastic Scattering of 187-Mev Electrons from Selected Even-Even Nuclei , Phys. Rev. 104 (1956) 1466

work page 1956
[51]

Straniero, C

O. Straniero, C. Pallanca, E. Dalessandro, I. Dominguez, F. R. Ferraro, M. Giannotti et al., The RGB tip of galactic globular clusters and the revision of the axion-electron coupling bound, Astron. Astrophys. 644 (2020) A166 [ 2010.03833]

work page arXiv 2020
[52]

D. G. Yakovlev and V. A. Urpin, Thermal and Electrical Conductivity in White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars, Soviet Astronomy 24 (1980) 303

work page 1980
[53]

Lampe, Transport Coefficients of Degenerate Plasma, Phys

M. Lampe, Transport Coefficients of Degenerate Plasma, Phys. Rev. 170 (1968) 306

work page 1968
[54]

V. A. Urpin and D. G. Yakovlev, Thermal Conductivity due to Collisions Between Electrons in a Degenerate Relativistic Electron Gas, Soviet Astronomy 24 (1980) 126

work page 1980
[55]

M. J. Harris, W. A. Fowler, G. R. Caughlan and B. A. Zimmerman, Thermonuclear reaction rates, III., Annual Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 21 (1983) 165

work page 1983
[56]

S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects. 1983, 10.1002/9783527617661

work page doi:10.1002/9783527617661 1983
[57]

Chiu, Stellar physics

H.-Y. Chiu, Stellar physics. Vol.1 . 1968

work page 1968
[58]

J. R. Buchler and W. R. Yueh, Compton scattering opacities in a partially degenerate electron plasma at high temperatures., Astrophys. J. 210 (1976) 440

work page 1976
[59]

T. A. Weaver, G. B. Zimmerman and S. E. Woosley, Presupernova evolution of massive stars , Astrophys. J. 225 (1978) 1021

work page 1978
[60]

Paczynski, Models of X-ray bursters with radius expansion, Astrophys

B. Paczynski, Models of X-ray bursters with radius expansion, Astrophys. J. 267 (1983) 315

work page 1983
[61]

Rosseland and flux mean opacities for Compton scattering

J. Poutanen, Rosseland and flux mean opacities for Compton scattering, Astrophys. J. 835 (2017) 119 [1606.09466]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[62]

N. Itoh, M. Nakagawa and Y. Kohyama, Relativistic free-free opacity for a high-temperature stellar plasma , Astrophys. J. 294 (1985) 17

work page 1985
[63]

W. J. Karzas and R. Latter, Electron Radiative Transitions in a Coulomb Field. , Astrophysical Journal Supplement 6 (1961) 167

work page 1961
[64]

P. S. Shternin and D. G. Yakovlev, Electron thermal conductivity owing to collisions between degenerate electrons, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 043004 [astro-ph/0608371]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[65]

Updated Electron-Conduction Opacities: The Impact on Low-Mass Stellar Models

S. Cassisi, A. Y. Potekhin, A. Pietrinferni, M. Catelan and M. Salaris, Updated Electron-Conduction Opacities: The Impact on Low-Mass Stellar Models , Astrophys. J. 661 (2007) 1094 [ astro-ph/0703011]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007