Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of disordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad-band limits

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in the broad-band (delta-function pulse) limit, 2DCS of disordered superconductors measures the dc Kerr susceptibility χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) directly, showing a Higgs-mode resonance at the gap frequency.

desk verdict Broad-band 2DCS as a dc Kerr spectrometer: the formal map is right, the experimental bridge is not yet built. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03936 v2 pith:432BEUIL submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.supr-con

Naoto Tsuji This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords two-dimensionalcoherentspectroscopydcKerreffectacHiggsmodedisorderedsuperconductorsself-consistentBornapproximationthirdharmonicgenerationNbN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a limit-based dictionary between two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy (2DCS) of disordered superconductors and specific third-order nonlinear susceptibilities. In the narrow-band limit (monochromatic pulses) the signal is carried by the third-harmonic and ac Kerr susceptibilities; in the broad-band limit (delta-function pulses) the signal along the diagonal and horizontal lines of the two-frequency plane is directly proportional to the dc Kerr susceptibility χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0). This matters because the dc Kerr susceptibility is normally hard to isolate, and because the paper's numerical calculation for a dirty BCS superconductor finds a resonance at the gap frequency Ω=2Δ dominated by the Higgs amplitude mode — the same resonance structure observed experimentally in NbN. The result reframes the interpretation of finite-bandwidth 2DCS experiments: real pulses lie between the two limits, and the observed 2DCS peak may contain a dc-Kerr component rather than being a narrow-band ac-Kerr effect.

What carries the argument

The general formula for the 2DCS nonlinear current as a frequency integral over χ(3)(ωt; ω, ωt−ωτ−ω, ωτ) weighted by the pulse spectra (Eq. (21)), together with its counterpart for the A1A2² term (Eq. (22)). Evaluating these integrals with monochromatic pulses reproduces the known discrete THG/ac-Kerr spots; evaluating them with delta-function pulses A(ω)∝1/(ω+iη) produces poles that make the signal diverge along ωt=ωτ and ωτ=0, and the remaining integrand is even in the loop frequency, collapsing to χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0). The numerical machinery is the diagrammatic classification (QP1–QP5, H1–H3) of the third-order susceptibility with impurity ladder vertices and the Higgs-mode (τ1) vertex within B

What would settle it

Compute the full 2DCS signal for finite-bandwidth pulses by evaluating the integrals in Eqs. (39)–(40) for the same lattice model: if the diagonal/horizontal-line intensity shows no resonance at Ω=2Δ (or its peak temperature does not track 2Δ(T)), the proposed dc-Kerr origin of the NbN peak is falsified. Experimentally, a pulse-bandwidth scan of 2DCS on a dirty NbN film would test the same point directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that what a two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy (2DCS) measurement sees depends on the bandwidth of its pulses. For monochromatic (narrow-band) pulses, the 2DCS signal reduces to known third-order susceptibilities: third-harmonic generation χ(3)(3Ω;Ω,Ω,Ω) and ac Kerr effect χ(3)(Ω;Ω,Ω,−Ω). For delta-function (broad-band) pulses, the signal diverges along the diagonal ωt=ωτ and horizontal ωτ=0 lines in the two-frequency plane, and after removing the divergent factor the amplitude along those lines is exactly the dc Kerr susceptibility χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) — a susceptibility in which one photon has zero frequency. Numerically, for a BCS lattice model with self-consisten

Load-bearing premise

The exact mapping from the 2DCS signal to the dc Kerr susceptibility holds only in the idealized delta-function pulse limit and on the diverging lines; realistic finite-bandwidth pulses require a full frequency integral of χ(3) that the paper does not compute, so the predicted Ω=2Δ peak may not survive with real pulses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Narrow-band 2DCS and broad-band 2DCS measure different physics — THG/ac-Kerr versus dc-Kerr — so the same experiment with different pulse widths can separate nonlinear processes that would otherwise be entangled.
  • In dirty superconductors, the dc Kerr susceptibility has a genuine resonance at Ω=2Δ, dominated by the Higgs mode, giving a frequency-localized signature that the ac Kerr susceptibility (a threshold) does not provide.
  • The temperature dependence of the dc Kerr resonance tracks the gap 2Δ(T), matching the NbN 2DCS peak, while the ac Kerr peak would stay near Tc regardless of probe frequency.
  • 2DCS in the broad-band limit offers a practical way to reconstruct χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0), a susceptibility that is difficult to access by other techniques.
  • Quasiparticle and Higgs contributions compete; in the clean limit the dc Kerr resonance at 2Δ is dominated by quasiparticles, so 2DCS alone cannot uniquely certify the Higgs mode.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative test follows from the paper's own caveat: evaluating the finite-bandwidth integrals (39)–(40) with realistic pulse shapes — Gaussian or sinc — should reproduce a peak near 2Δ whose amplitude grows as the pulse bandwidth increases; if it does not, the proposed explanation of the NbN peak loses its basis.
  • The same pulse-bandwidth dictionary may apply beyond superconductors: in any inversion-symmetric nonlinear medium, delta-pulse 2DCS along the diagonal/horizontal lines should isolate the dc Kerr component, offering a general spectroscopy of 'one-photon plus DC field' mixing.
  • The zero-frequency leg of χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) suggests a connection to optically induced DC currents or rectification processes; measuring 2DCS alongside dc photocurrent in the same sample could cross-check the microscopic origin of the resonance.
  • Because the H3 diagram dominates only in the dirty regime, the broad-band resonance height versus disorder strength γ is a tunable prediction: one could map the Higgs-versus-quasiparticle crossover by controlled impurity doping.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives general formulas for two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy (2DCS) in terms of the third-order nonlinear susceptibility for arbitrary pulse envelopes (Eqs. (21),(22)), then specializes to two limits. In the narrow-band (monochromatic) limit, the 2DCS signal at selected points is proportional to χ(3)(3Ω;Ω,Ω,Ω) (THG) and χ(3)(Ω;Ω,Ω,-Ω) (ac Kerr). In the broad-band (delta-function pulse) limit, the signal diverges along the diagonal and horizontal lines; after subtracting the divergent prefactors, one component is proportional to χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0), which the authors identify as the dc Kerr susceptibility. The paper numerically evaluates these susceptibilities for a lattice s-wave superconductor with disorder treated by the self-consistent Born approximation, decomposing the results into quasiparticle and Higgs-mode diagrams. It finds a threshold at Ω=2Δ for the ac Kerr susceptibility and a resonance at Ω=2Δ for the dc Kerr susceptibility, with the Higgs mode dominant in the dirty regime. The authors explicitly note that connecting these results to the NbN experiment requires evaluating finite-bandwidth convolution integrals (Eqs. (39),(40)), which is left as a future problem.

Significance. If correct, the identification of the broad-band 2DCS signal with χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) is conceptually useful and goes beyond previous narrow-band analyses; the general pulse-envelope formulas are a useful starting point. The numerical calculations are extensive, and the diagrammatic decomposition allows the Higgs-versus-quasiparticle competition to be assessed. The paper is transparent about its main limitation, the uncomputed finite-bandwidth integral, so the formal claims are not overstated. On the other hand, the experimental relevance to the NbN peak remains conjectural. The derivations leading to Eqs. (34)-(38) are sound (I checked the partial-fraction and principal-value steps), and the omission of code/data is not a blocker for this type of paper.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI.B / Sec. VII] The finite-bandwidth convolution is the main gap. Eqs. (36) and (38) are derived for ideal delta-function pulses and give the coefficient of the 1/(ωt-ωτ+2iη) divergence. For realistic finite-bandwidth pulses the signal is the full integral in Eqs. (39)-(40), which the paper does not evaluate. The tentative explanation of the NbN 2DCS peak at Ω=2Δ via the dc Kerr contribution is therefore unsupported unless one shows that this convolution preserves the resonance. The paper explicitly acknowledges this (Sec. VI.B last paragraph; Sec. VII first open issue), so it is not an internal inconsistency, but it is a load-bearing limitation for the experimental discussion. I recommend either softening the abstract/Summary claims or adding a numerical evaluation (or a controlled estimate) of the convolution for a representative pulse.
  2. [Sec. V, Eqs. (35)-(38)] The identification of χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) as the 'dc Kerr susceptibility' needs clarification of the gauge/coupling convention. Eq. (20) defines χ(3) via functional derivatives with respect to the vector potential A; a zero-frequency A does not correspond to a static electric field (E=0). The zero-frequency 'photon' in this calculation comes from the step-function vector potential that accompanies a delta E pulse, i.e., a momentum kick rather than a dc E field. The conventional dc Kerr effect is defined with a static electric field. Please state explicitly that χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0) is the vector-potential (impulsive) dc response and discuss (or cite) its relation to the electric-field dc Kerr coefficient, so that readers do not misapply the result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C] The formulas are lengthy and no code or data are provided. For reproducibility, please consider providing the numerical code or a data repository, or at least a verification of a limiting case (e.g., γ→0 or Ω→0) for the dc Kerr susceptibility.
  2. [Figures 6, 8, 12, 13] The plotted quantity is |χ(3)|², not the actual 2DCS signal. The captions should state that the divergent prefactors and principal-value integrals in Eqs. (39)-(40) are not included.
  3. [Eqs. (39)-(40)] The sentence 'the frequency integral ... on top of the dc Kerr susceptibility' could be misread; the P∫ terms are the regular part of the same convolution, not a separate additive contribution. Consider rewording for clarity.
  4. [Table II] In the clean/ac-Kerr column, the entry 'Higgs (off-resonant)' may confuse because Fig. 12 shows the H3 diagram dominates while the resonance at Ω=Δ is quasiparticle-dominated. A footnote distinguishing 'dominant diagram' from 'resonant process' would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 2DCS-to-χ(3) relations are derived analytically from the general convolution formula, and the numerical susceptibilities are computed from the model rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Starting from the general 2DCS convolution formula (Eq. (21)), inserting the δ-function pulse spectra of the broad-band limit yields Eqs. (34) and (37). At the diagonal and horizontal lines, the identity 1/(ω+iη)=P(1/ω)−iπδ(ω), combined with the exchange symmetry of χ(3), selects χ(3)(Ω;0,0,Ω)=χ(3)(Ω;Ω,0,0). This is an analytic identity, not a fitted parameter or a definitional sleight: the dc Kerr susceptibility is not put in by hand, it emerges from the frequency integral. The numerical evaluation solves the BCS gap equation and the self-consistent Born approximation self-consistently (Appendix A), with the impurity and Higgs-mode vertex equations and all susceptibility diagrams written out explicitly in Appendices B and C. The gap Δ, the threshold at 2Δ, and the resonance at 2Δ are outputs of the calculation, not inputs. Citations to the author's previous THG work (Ref. [50]) are used for diagrammatic bookkeeping, but the paper states the actual equations, so the derivation does not reduce to the citation. The acknowledged limitation is that realistic finite-bandwidth pulses require evaluating Eqs. (39)–(40), which is an uncomputed convolution and a potential applicability gap, not a circularity: the delta-pulse limit result stands on its own.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only inputs are model parameters chosen to realize dirty/clean regimes; no experimental data are fitted. The central analytical results depend on standard nonlinear-response definitions and inversion symmetry. The numerical results depend on BCS mean-field and self-consistent Born approximations, whose limitations (no Cooperons, no multiband effects) are stated in Sec. VII.

free parameters (5)
  • V (attractive interaction strength) = 2.5 (in units of t_h)
    Chosen ad hoc to produce a superconducting gap 2Δ=0.50 in the dirty regime; not fitted to experiment.
  • γ (disorder scattering rate) = 2 (dirty) / 0.5 (clean)
    Chosen to realize dirty (γ/(2Δ)=4.0) and clean (γ/(2Δ)=0.45) regimes; not fitted to experiment.
  • β (inverse temperature) = 50
    Deep superconducting phase; Tc≈0.14 corresponds to βc≈7.1.
  • η (broadening factor) = 0.01
    Ad hoc imaginary part to broaden Green's functions and susceptibilities; affects sub-gap weight.
  • N (number of k points) = 100x100
    Lattice size chosen for numerical feasibility; convergence checked up to 200x200.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption BCS mean-field decoupling of the pairing interaction
    Used to define gap function Δ(t) and Green's functions in Eqs. (A4)-(A7); neglects fluctuations beyond mean field.
  • domain assumption Self-consistent Born approximation for disorder
    Disorder self-energy given by Eq. (43) includes noncrossing impurity diagrams; ignores localization/Cooperon contributions (stated in Sec. VII).
  • domain assumption Inversion symmetry of the lattice, so second-order response vanishes
    Used in Eq. (14) expansion; square lattice at half filling has inversion symmetry.
  • standard math Keldysh formalism and Langreth rules
    Used to evaluate nonequilibrium Green's functions and susceptibilities.
  • domain assumption Scale separation of dirty regime, Eq. (1)
    Justifies SCBA and dirty-regime treatment; parameters chosen to roughly satisfy it.
  • domain assumption Higgs mode propagator via τ1 vertex with ladder impurity corrections
    Diagrammatic classification in Table I and Fig. 7; relies on standard BCS collective-mode treatment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of disordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad-band limits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/432BEUIL

@misc{pith2026250903936,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of disordered superconductors in the narrow-band and broad-band limits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/432BEUIL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03936}
}
abstract

We theoretically analyze two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy (2DCS) signals for disordered superconductors in two limits: One is the narrow-band limit with sinusoidal pulse waves, and the other is the broad-band limit with delta-function pulses. While the 2DCS signal in the narrow-band limit is related to the third-order nonlinear susceptibilities $\chi^{(3)}(3\Omega; \Omega, \Omega, \Omega)$ (third harmonic generation) and $\chi^{(3)}(\Omega; \Omega, \Omega, -\Omega)$ (ac Kerr effect), we find that in the broad-band limit the signal along the diagonal and horizontal lines in the two-dimensional frequency space is related to another nonlinear susceptibility $\chi^{(3)}(\Omega; \Omega, 0, 0)$ (dc Kerr effect). We numerically evaluate those susceptibilities for a lattice model of superconductors based on the BCS mean-field theory and self-consistent Born approximation for impurities. The 2DCS signals in the narrow-band and broad-band limits show threshold and resonance behaviors at the superconducting-gap frequency, respectively, whose physical origin is discussed in light of quasiparticle and Higgs-mode excitations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03936 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic picture of the configuration of two pulses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. 2DCS spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. 2DCS spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Single-particle spectrum in the superconducting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Intensity of the ac Kerr susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the optical con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. H3 diagrams for [(a), (b)] the ac Kerr susceptibil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Temperature dependence of the ac Kerr suscepti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Temperature dependence of the dc Kerr susceptibil [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Intensity of the ac Kerr susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Third-order susceptibility diagrams for disordered superconductors within the self-consistent Born approximation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Two-dimensional THz spectroscopy in electronic systems: a many-body diagrammatic approach

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A many-body diagrammatic theory computes 2D THz spectroscopy maps from third-order nonlinear kernels, separates paramagnetic and diamagnetic processes, and shows propagation through the sample can dominate and mask th...

  2. Power attenuation in millimeter-wave and terahertz superconducting rectangular waveguides: linear response, TLS loss, and Higgs-mode nonlinearity

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A microscopic framework predicts power attenuation in superconducting rectangular waveguides from 100 GHz to THz, including TLS oxide losses and a predicted Higgs-mode peak in attenuation near the gap frequency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    response, the broad-band pulses are modeled by delta- functions, E(t) = A1δ(t) + A2δ(t + τ ), (30) where the pulse 1 is centered at t = 0, and the pulse 2 is centered at t = −τ

    The blue and purple markers correspond to the third harmonic generation and ac Kerr susceptibilities, respectively. response, the broad-band pulses are modeled by delta- functions, E(t) = A1δ(t) + A2δ(t + τ ), (30) where the pulse 1 is centered at t = 0, and the pulse 2 is centered at t = −τ . The corresponding vector potential is given by A(t) = A1(t) +A...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Coherent two-dimensional optical spec- troscopy,

    M. Cho, “Coherent two-dimensional optical spec- troscopy,” Chem. Rev. 108, 1331 (2008). 20

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Hamm and M

    P. Hamm and M. Zanni, Concepts and Methods of 2D In- frared Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Co- herent two-dimensional and broadband electronic spec- troscopies,

    S. Biswas, J.-W. Kim, X. Zhang, and G. D. Scholes, “Co- herent two-dimensional and broadband electronic spec- troscopies,” Chem. Rev. 122, 4257 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    E. Fresch, F. V. A. Camargo, Q. Shen, C. C. Bellora, T. Pullerits, G. S. Engel, G. Cerullo, and E. Collini, “Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 3, 84 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Multidimensional terahertz probes of quantum materials,

    A. Liu, “Multidimensional terahertz probes of quantum materials,” npj Quant. Mater. 10, 18 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Unlocking Quantum Control and Multi- Order Correlations via Terahertz Two-Dimensional Co- herent Spectroscopy

    C. Huang and M. Mootz and L. Luo and I. E. Perakis and J. Wang, “Unlocking Quantum Control and Multi- Order Correlations via Terahertz Two-Dimensional Co- herent Spectroscopy”, arXiv:2507.02116

    work page arXiv

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Higgs and Nambu-Goldstone modes in condensed matter physics,

    N. Tsuji, I. Danshita, and S. Tsuchiya, “Higgs and Nambu-Goldstone modes in condensed matter physics,” in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition) (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) 2nd ed., pp. 174–186

    2024

  2. [10]

    Random-Phase Approximation in the Theory of Superconductivity,

    P. W. Anderson, “Random-Phase Approximation in the Theory of Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958)

    1900

  3. [11]

    The approach to equilibrium in a pure su- perconductor the relaxation of the Cooper pair density,

    A. Schmid, “The approach to equilibrium in a pure su- perconductor the relaxation of the Cooper pair density,” Phys. Kondens. Mater. 8, 129 (1968)

    1968

  4. [12]

    Amplitude/Higgs Modes in Condensed Matter Physics,

    D. Pekker and C.M. Varma, “Amplitude/Higgs Modes in Condensed Matter Physics,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys. 6, 269 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Higgs Mode in Superconduc- tors,

    R. Shimano and N. Tsuji, “Higgs Mode in Superconduc- tors,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 103 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Amplitude Higgs Mode and Admittance in Superconductors with a Moving Condensate,

    A. Moor, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, “Amplitude Higgs Mode and Admittance in Superconductors with a Moving Condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 047001 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Infrared Activation of the Higgs Mode by Supercurrent Injection in Superconduct- ing NbN,

    S. Nakamura, Y. Iida, Y. Murotani, R. Matsunaga, H. Terai, and R. Shimano, “Infrared Activation of the Higgs Mode by Supercurrent Injection in Superconduct- ing NbN,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257001 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Significant contributions of the Higgs mode and impurity-scattering self-energy corrections to the low-frequency complex conductivity in dc-biased super- conducting devices,

    T. Kubo, “Significant contributions of the Higgs mode and impurity-scattering self-energy corrections to the low-frequency complex conductivity in dc-biased super- conducting devices,” Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 044042 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Higgs amplitude mode in optical conductivity in the presence of a su- percurrent: Gauge-invariant formulation with disorder,

    K. Wang, R. Boyack, and K. Levin, “Higgs amplitude mode in optical conductivity in the presence of a su- percurrent: Gauge-invariant formulation with disorder,” Phys. Rev. B 111, 144512 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Opti- cally active Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband pair- density-wave superconductors with Lifshitz invariant,

    R. Nagashima, T. Mouilleron, and N. Tsuji, “Opti- cally active Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband pair- density-wave superconductors with Lifshitz invariant,” Phys. Rev. B 112, 024503 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Current-Enabled Optical Conductivity of Col- lective Modes in Unconventional Superconductors

    G. Niederhoff, R. Kataoka, K. Takasan, and N. Tsuji, “Current-Enabled Optical Conductivity of Col- lective Modes in Unconventional Superconductors”, arXiv:2504.06642

  12. [20]

    Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to charge-density waves,

    R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, “Raman scattering by superconducting-gap excitations and their coupling to charge-density waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 660–662 (1980)

    1980

  13. [21]

    Raman scattering from superconducting gap excitations in the presence of a magnetic field,

    R. Sooryakumar and M. V. Klein, “Raman scattering from superconducting gap excitations in the presence of a magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B 23, 3213–3221 (1981)

    1981

  14. [22]

    Gauge-Invariant Theory of the Dynamical Interaction of Charge Density Waves and Superconductivity,

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, “Gauge-Invariant Theory of the Dynamical Interaction of Charge Density Waves and Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 811– 814 (1981)

    1981

  15. [23]

    Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves,

    P. B. Littlewood and C. M. Varma, “Amplitude collective modes in superconductors and their coupling to charge- density waves,” Phys. Rev. B 26, 4883 (1982)

    1982

  16. [24]

    Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2 H − NbSe2 superconductor,

    M.-A. M´ easson, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, B. Clair, P. Rodi` ere, L. Cario, and A. Sacuto, “Amplitude Higgs mode in the 2 H − NbSe2 superconductor,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 060503 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Higgs-mode radiance and charge-density-wave order in 2H − NbSe2,

    R. Grasset, T. Cea, Y. Gallais, M. Cazayous, A. Sacuto, L. Cario, L. Benfatto, and M.-A. M´ easson, “Higgs-mode radiance and charge-density-wave order in 2H − NbSe2,” Phys. Rev. B 97, 094502 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Pressure- Induced Collapse of the Charge Density Wave and Higgs Mode Visibility in 2 H−TaS2,

    R. Grasset, Y. Gallais, A. Sacuto, M. Cazayous, S. Ma˜ nas Valero, E. Coronado, and M.-A. M´ easson, “Pressure- Induced Collapse of the Charge Density Wave and Higgs Mode Visibility in 2 H−TaS2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 127001 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Higgs Amplitude Mode in the BCS Superconductors Nb 1−xTixN Induced by Terahertz Pulse Excitation,

    R. Matsunaga, Y. I. Hamada, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, and R. Shimano, “Higgs Amplitude Mode in the BCS Superconductors Nb 1−xTixN Induced by Terahertz Pulse Excitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057002 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Light-induced collective pseudospin preces- sion resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor,

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, H. Fujita, A. Sugioka, K. Makise, Y. Uzawa, H. Terai, Z. Wang, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, “Light-induced collective pseudospin preces- sion resonating with Higgs mode in a superconductor,” Science 345, 1145 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Higgs Mode in the d-Wave Super- conductor Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Driven by an Intense Ter- ahertz Pulse,

    K. Katsumi, N. Tsuji, Y. I. Hamada, R. Matsunaga, J. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, G. D. Gu, H. Aoki, Y. Gal- lais, and R. Shimano, “Higgs Mode in the d-Wave Super- conductor Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x Driven by an Intense Ter- ahertz Pulse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117001 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Superconducting fluctuations probed by the Higgs mode in Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x thin films,

    K. Katsumi, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, Y. Gallais, and R. Shimano, “Superconducting fluctuations probed by the Higgs mode in Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+x thin films,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 054510 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Theory of Anderson pseudospin resonance with Higgs mode in superconductors,

    N. Tsuji and H. Aoki, “Theory of Anderson pseudospin resonance with Higgs mode in superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 064508 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Polarization-resolved terahertz third- harmonic generation in a single-crystal superconductor NbN: Dominance of the Higgs mode beyond the BCS approximation,

    R. Matsunaga, N. Tsuji, K. Makise, H. Terai, H. Aoki, and R. Shimano, “Polarization-resolved terahertz third- harmonic generation in a single-crystal superconductor NbN: Dominance of the Higgs mode beyond the BCS approximation,” Phys. Rev. B 96, 020505 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Phase-resolved Higgs response in super- conducting cuprates,

    H. Chu, M.-J. Kim, K. Katsumi, S. Kovalev, R. D. Daw- son, L. Schwarz, N. Yoshikawa, G. Kim, D. Putzky, Z. Z. Li, H. Raffy, S. Germanskiy, J.-C. Deinert, N. Awari, I. Ilyakov, B. Green, M. Chen, M. Bawatna, G. Cristiani, G. Logvenov, Y. Gallais, A. V. Boris, B. Keimer, A. P. S...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Band- selective third-harmonic generation in superconducting MgB2: Possible evidence for the Higgs amplitude mode in the dirty limit,

    S. Kovalev, T. Dong, L.-Y. Shi, C. Reinhoffer, T.-Q. Xu, H.-Z. Wang, Y. Wang, Z.-Z. Gan, S. German- skiy, J.-C. Deinert, I. Ilyakov, P. H. M. van Loosdrecht, D. Wu, N.-L. Wang, J. Demsar, and Z. Wang, “Band- selective third-harmonic generation in superconducting MgB2: Possible...

    2021

  27. [35]

    Light-induced enhancement of super- 21 conductivity in iron-based superconductor FeSe0.5Te0.5,

    K. Isoyama, N. Yoshikawa, K. Katsumi, J. Wong, N. Shikama, Y. Sakishita, F. Nabeshima, A. Maeda, and R. Shimano, “Light-induced enhancement of super- 21 conductivity in iron-based superconductor FeSe0.5Te0.5,” Commun. Phys. 4, 160 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Transient Higgs oscillations and high-order nonlinear light-Higgs coupling in a terahertz wave driven NbN superconduc- tor,

    Z.-X. Wang, J.-R. Xue, H.-K. Shi, X.-Q. Jia, T. Lin, L.- Y. Shi, T. Dong, F. Wang, and N.-L. Wang, “Transient Higgs oscillations and high-order nonlinear light-Higgs coupling in a terahertz wave driven NbN superconduc- tor,” Phys. Rev. B 105, L100508 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Near-infrared light-induced superconducting-like state in underdoped YBa 2Cu3Oy studied by c-axis terahertz third-harmonic generation,

    K. Katsumi, M. Nishida, S. Kaiser, S. Miyasaka, S. Tajima, and R. Shimano, “Near-infrared light-induced superconducting-like state in underdoped YBa 2Cu3Oy studied by c-axis terahertz third-harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 214506 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Tracing the dynamics of superconducting order via tran- sient terahertz third-harmonic generation,

    M.-J. Kim, S. Kovalev, M. Udina, R. Haenel, G. Kim, M. Puviani, G. Cristiani, I. Ilyakov, T. V. A. G. de Oliveira, A. Ponomaryov, J.-C. Deinert, G. Logvenov, B. Keimer, D. Manske, L. Benfatto, and S. Kaiser, “Tracing the dynamics of superconducting order via tran- sient terahe...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Revealing Novel Aspects of Light- Matter Coupling by Terahertz Two-Dimensional Coher- ent Spectroscopy: The Case of the Amplitude Mode in Superconductors,

    K. Katsumi, J. Fiore, M. Udina, R. Romero, D. Barbalas, J. Jesudasan, P. Raychaudhuri, G. Seibold, L. Benfatto, and N. P. Armitage, “Revealing Novel Aspects of Light- Matter Coupling by Terahertz Two-Dimensional Coher- ent Spectroscopy: The Case of the Amplitude Mode in Superc...

    2024

  32. [40]

    Amplitude Mode in a Multigap Superconductor MgB 2 Investigated by Terahertz Two- Dimensional Coherent Spectroscopy,

    K. Katsumi, J. Liang, R. Romero, K. Chen, X. Xi, and N. P. Armitage, “Amplitude Mode in a Multigap Superconductor MgB 2 Investigated by Terahertz Two- Dimensional Coherent Spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036902 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Observation of cupratelike nonlinear terahertz responses in supercon- ducting infinite-layer nickelates via two-dimensional co- herent spectroscopy,

    B. Cheng, D. Cheng, K. Lee, M. Mootz, C. Huang, L. Luo, Z. Chen, Y. Lee, B. Y. Wang, I. E. Perakis, Z.-X. Shen, H. Y. Hwang, and J. Wang, “Observation of cupratelike nonlinear terahertz responses in supercon- ducting infinite-layer nickelates via two-dimensional co- herent spe...

    2025

  34. [42]

    Planckian dissipation, anomalous high temperature THz non-linear response and energy relaxation in the strange metal state of the cuprate superconductors

    D. Chaudhuri and D. Barbalas and F. Mahmood and J. Liang and R. Romero III and A. Legros and X. He and H. Raffy and I. Bozovic and N. P. Armitage, “Planckian dissipation, anomalous high temperature THz non-linear response and energy relaxation in the strange metal state of the...

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy of light-driven states and their collective modes in multiband supercon- ductors,

    M. Mootz, L. Luo, C. Huang, J. Wang, and I. E. Perakis, “Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy of light-driven states and their collective modes in multiband supercon- ductors,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 014515 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Principles of two-dimensional terahertz spec- troscopy of collective excitations: The case of Josephson plasmons in layered superconductors,

    A. G´ omez Salvador, P. E. Dolgirev, M. H. Michael, A. Liu, D. Pavicevic, M. Fechner, A. Cavalleri, and E. Demler, “Principles of two-dimensional terahertz spec- troscopy of collective excitations: The case of Josephson plasmons in layered superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 09...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Multidimensional coherent spec- troscopy of correlated lattice systems,

    J. Chen and P. Werner, “Multidimensional coherent spec- troscopy of correlated lattice systems,” npj Comput. Mater. 11, 127 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Higgs mode in two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of weak-coupling antiferromagnets

    J. Chen and N. Tsuji and P. Werner, “Higgs mode in two-dimensional coherent spectroscopy of weak-coupling antiferromagnets”, arXiv:2504.21351

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Theory of the Anoma- lous Skin Effect in Normal and Superconducting Metals,

    D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, “Theory of the Anoma- lous Skin Effect in Normal and Superconducting Metals,” Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958)

    1958

  40. [48]

    Quasiclassical Theory on Third-Harmonic Gen- eration in Conventional Superconductors with Paramag- netic Impurities,

    T. Jujo, “Quasiclassical Theory on Third-Harmonic Gen- eration in Conventional Superconductors with Paramag- netic Impurities,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 024704 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Nonlinear optical re- sponse of collective modes in multiband superconductors assisted by nonmagnetic impurities,

    Y. Murotani and R. Shimano, “Nonlinear optical re- sponse of collective modes in multiband superconductors assisted by nonmagnetic impurities,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 224510 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Nonlinear electromagnetic response and Higgs-mode excitation in BCS superconductors with im- purities,

    M. Silaev, “Nonlinear electromagnetic response and Higgs-mode excitation in BCS superconductors with im- purities,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 224511 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Higgs-mode resonance in third harmonic generation in NbN superconductors: Multiband electron-phonon coupling, impurity scatter- ing, and polarization-angle dependence,

    N. Tsuji and Y. Nomura, “Higgs-mode resonance in third harmonic generation in NbN superconductors: Multiband electron-phonon coupling, impurity scatter- ing, and polarization-angle dependence,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043029 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Third harmonic generation from collective modes in dis- ordered superconductors,

    G. Seibold, M. Udina, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, “Third harmonic generation from collective modes in dis- ordered superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 014512 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Nonlinear light– Higgs coupling in superconductors beyond BCS: Effects of the retarded phonon-mediated interaction,

    N. Tsuji, Y. Murakami, and H. Aoki, “Nonlinear light– Higgs coupling in superconductors beyond BCS: Effects of the retarded phonon-mediated interaction,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 224519 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Nonlinear op- tical effects and third-harmonic generation in supercon- ductors: Cooper pairs versus Higgs mode contribution,

    T. Cea, C. Castellani, and L. Benfatto, “Nonlinear op- tical effects and third-harmonic generation in supercon- ductors: Cooper pairs versus Higgs mode contribution,” Phys. Rev. B 93, 180507 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    In order to have a difference of several orders of magnitudes between vF W and L, we need at least L ≳ 102a

    Typically, in lattice models one has vF ∼ W a. In order to have a difference of several orders of magnitudes between vF W and L, we need at least L ≳ 102a

  48. [56]

    Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions,

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, “Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979)

    1979

  49. [57]

    Anderson Localization in Two Dimensions,

    P. A. Lee and D. S. Fisher, “Anderson Localization in Two Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 882 (1981)

    1981

  50. [58]

    Rammer, Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    J. Rammer, Quantum Field Theory of Non-equilibrium States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    On the theory of superconducting alloys I. The electrodynamics of alloys at absolute zero

    A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, “On the theory of superconducting alloys I. The electrodynamics of alloys at absolute zero”, Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 1090 (1959)

    1959

  52. [60]

    Diagrammatic technique for nonequilib- rium processes

    L. V. Keldysh, “Diagrammatic technique for nonequilib- rium processes”, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1018 (1965)

    1965

  53. [61]

    Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications,

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, “Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    Two-Photon Absorption by Impurity Scatter- ing and Amplitude Mode in Conventional Superconduc- tors,

    T. Jujo, “Two-Photon Absorption by Impurity Scatter- ing and Amplitude Mode in Conventional Superconduc- tors,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 114711 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Magnetoresistance and Hall effect in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas,

    B. L. Altshuler, D. Khmel’nitzkii, A. I. Larkin, and P. A. Lee, “Magnetoresistance and Hall effect in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas,” Phys. Rev. B 22, 5142– 5153 (1980)

    1980

  56. [64]

    Number-Phase Fluctuations in Two-Band Superconductors,

    A. J. Leggett, “Number-Phase Fluctuations in Two-Band Superconductors,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 36, 901 (1966)

    1966

  57. [65]

    Signatures of nonadiabatic BCS state dynamics in pump-probe conductivity,

    H. Krull, D. Manske, G. S. Uhrig, and A. P. Schny- der, “Signatures of nonadiabatic BCS state dynamics in pump-probe conductivity,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 014515 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Theory of light- induced resonances with collective Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband superconductors,

    Y. Murotani, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, “Theory of light- induced resonances with collective Higgs and Leggett modes in multiband superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 95, 104503 (2017)

    2017

  59. [67]

    Optical response of the Leggett mode in multiband superconductors in the linear response regime,

    T. Kamatani, S. Kitamura, N. Tsuji, R. Shimano, and T. Morimoto, “Optical response of the Leggett mode in multiband superconductors in the linear response regime,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 094520 (2022). 22

    2022

  60. [68]

    Classification of Lifshitz invariant in multi- band superconductors: An application to Leggett modes in the linear response regime in Kagome lattice models,

    R. Nagashima, S. Tian, R. Haenel, N. Tsuji, and D. Manske, “Classification of Lifshitz invariant in multi- band superconductors: An application to Leggett modes in the linear response regime in Kagome lattice models,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013120 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Role of Higgs and Leggett modes for the third harmonic response in noncentrosym- metric superconductors,

    S. Klein and D. Manske, “Role of Higgs and Leggett modes for the third harmonic response in noncentrosym- metric superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 014510 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Linear spectroscopy of collective modes and the gap structure in two-dimensional superconductors,

    B. A. Levitan, Y. Oreg, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, and I. Iorsh, “Linear spectroscopy of collective modes and the gap structure in two-dimensional superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043170 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Amplitude or Higgs modes in d-wave superconductors,

    Y. Barlas and C. M. Varma, “Amplitude or Higgs modes in d-wave superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 054503 (2013)

    2013

  64. [72]

    Classification and character- ization of nonequilibrium Higgs modes in unconventional superconductors,

    L. Schwarz, B. Fauseweh, N. Tsuji, N. Cheng, N. Bit- tner, H. Krull, M. Berciu, G. S. Uhrig, A. P. Schnyder, S. Kaiser, and D. Manske, “Classification and character- ization of nonequilibrium Higgs modes in unconventional superconductors,” Nat. Commun. 11, 287 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Theory of driven Higgs oscil- lations and third-harmonic generation in unconventional superconductors,

    L. Schwarz and D. Manske, “Theory of driven Higgs oscil- lations and third-harmonic generation in unconventional superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 184519 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Light quantum control of persist- ing Higgs modes in iron-based superconductors,

    C. Vaswani, J. H. Kang, M. Mootz, L. Luo, X. Yang, C. Sundahl, D. Cheng, C. Huang, R. H. J. Kim, Z. Liu, Y. G. Collantes, E. E. Hellstrom, I. E. Perakis, C. B. Eom, and J. Wang, “Light quantum control of persist- ing Higgs modes in iron-based superconductors,” Nat. Commun. 12,...

    2021

  67. [75]

    Spectroscopic signatures of time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity,

    N. R. Poniatowski, J. B. Curtis, A. Yacoby, and P. Narang, “Spectroscopic signatures of time-reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity,” Commun. Phys. 5, 44 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Excitons and Plasmons in Superconductors,

    A. Bardasis and J. R. Schrieffer, “Excitons and Plasmons in Superconductors,” Phys. Rev. 121, 1050 (1961)

    1961

  69. [77]

    D. C. Langreth, in Linear and Nonlinear Electron Trans- port in Solids, edited by J. T. Devreese and V. E. van Doren (Plenum Press, New York, 1976)

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.