Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Wavefront correction of high-dimensional two-photon states via coherence-entanglement transfer

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Focusing the pump turns the two-photon state into its own classical-like probe: the same source measures the scattering medium's transmission matrix from intensity images and then transmits a corrected high-dimensional entangled state, with

desk verdict A clever self-beaconing scheme that plausibly works for thin scatterers, but the evidence is more suggestive than quantitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04170 v1 pith:HTV3AQYV submitted 2025-09-04 quant-ph physics.optics

Shaurya Aarav , Hugo Defienne This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords wavefrontcorrectiontwo-photonentanglementSchmidtnumbertransmissionmatrixscatteringmediumspontaneousparametricdown-conversionquantumimagingspatiallightmodulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a two-photon source can correct its own propagation errors: the quantum state itself serves as the probe that measures a scattering medium, removing the need for a separate classical beacon beam. The enabling move is pump shaping — focusing the pump on the crystal lowers the two-photon state's Schmidt number and restores its first-order spatial coherence, so the beam produces the high-contrast intensity speckle that classical wavefront-shaping algorithms need. That classical-like probe measures the medium's transmission matrix in milliseconds; then, with the pump defocused, the same correction pattern reshapes the high-dimensional entangled state and restores its spatial correlations. A sympathetic reader would care because beacon-based corrections are fragile — the beacon must match the quantum state in wavelength, polarization, and temporal bandwidth — while this approach matches all of them by construction. If right, high-dimensional quantum communication and imaging through scattering media can run on the same hardware already used to shape entangled photons.

What carries the argument

The coherence–entanglement transfer, quantified by two expressions adapted from the literature: the first-order spatial coherence function g^(1)(r, −r) and the Schmidt number K, both written in terms of the pump waist w, crystal length L, and pump wavelength λ_p. Focusing the pump shrinks K and widens the spatial coherence length, so the same SPDC state can be dialed between 'classical probe' and 'high-dimensional entangled state.' The second load-bearing element is transmission-matrix wavefront shaping performed on the low-K probe: the measured phase mask both cancels the scatterer and structures the beam, and because the medium is thin and lies in the SLM's image plane, that same mask acts

What would settle it

Replace the thin parafilm with a volumetric or strongly mode-mixing scatterer (for instance, a thick ground-glass diffuser or a multimode fiber) or move the scatterer out of the SLM's image plane, then apply the two-step protocol: measure the transmission matrix with the focused-pump, low-Schmidt-number state and check whether the correction restores the G^(2) correlation peak for the high-Schmidt-number state. If the peak enhancement stays near unity — the correlations are not restored — the single-plane transfer of the correction is refuted. The same test, run as a function of scatterer thic

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that entanglement dimensionality and spatial coherence in an SPDC two-photon state are two settings of the same dial. With a collimated pump (K ≈ 37 in the experiment), the state is high-dimensional and its intensity shows no distinctive structure; with a focused pump, the Schmidt number drops and the state behaves like a classical coherent beam, producing a clean focal spot that turns into a measurable intensity speckle pattern when a thin scatterer is inserted. The authors exploit this: they measure the scattering medium's transmission matrix from 800 ms of intensity images of the low-Schmidt-number state using a standard TM-based method, display the corrective phase p

Load-bearing premise

The scattering medium is thin and positioned exactly in the image plane of the SLM, so a single phase pattern bends every spatial mode of the two-photon state in the same way — if the medium mixes spatial modes, the correction learned from the low-entanglement probe no longer matches the high-entanglement state.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One SPDC source and one SLM suffice to correct and shape high-dimensional entangled states through a thin scattering medium, eliminating the separate beacon laser and its alignment overhead.
  • Because the probe is the quantum state itself, the correction automatically matches the entangled state in wavelength, polarization, and temporal bandwidth — the properties that make external beacons fail in dispersive media such as multimode fibers.
  • The correction is not limited to restoring correlations: the same transmission matrix can shape the transmitted correlations into arbitrary configurations (e.g., four spots), enabling information encoding through the scatterer.
  • The simulations establish an operating principle: wavefront optimization must be performed in the low-Schmidt-number regime, since speckle contrast and enhancement both collapse as K grows.
  • The protocol is aimed at settings where a classical reference is impractical — the paper points to ghost imaging with non-degenerate wavelengths and resource-constrained quantum communication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the correction is learned at low K and applied at high K, the fidelity of transfer is bounded by how well the low-K probe samples the same transverse modes the high-K state occupies; a direct stress test would be to compare the transmission matrix measured at the two pump settings rather than judging only the final correlation peak.
  • The Schmidt-number dial suggests a closed-loop scheme: periodically re-focus the pump for a short interval to re-learn the transmission matrix, enabling correction of slowly drifting or partially dynamic scatterers without a second light source.
  • The same logic should extend to non-degenerate two-photon states (e.g., ghost imaging where the two photons have different wavelengths), where a classical beacon would have to be duplicated per wavelength; the catch is that both arms must share the same single-plane scatterer.
  • The drop of enhancement with K in the simulations implies an engineering trade-off: one can choose the smallest Schmidt number that still supports the required correlations, trading probe speed and correction fidelity against the information capacity of the transmitted state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a method for correcting wavefront distortions in high-dimensional spatially-entangled two-photon states without a classical beacon. By focusing the pump beam on the nonlinear crystal, the authors generate a low-Schmidt-number two-photon state that exhibits first-order spatial coherence and produces intensity speckle after scattering, analogous to classical light. They use this state to measure the transmission matrix of a thin phase-only scatterer via a spatial light modulator. Applying the same correction to a high-Schmidt-number entangled state restores the minus-coordinate correlation peak and allows shaping the correlations. The concept relies on the coherence-entanglement duality and on the thin-scatterer geometry. Experimental images demonstrate the effect.

Significance. If validated quantitatively, the method provides a resource-minimal approach to quantum wavefront shaping, as it uses the two-photon state itself rather than a separate beacon. This addresses a practical drawback of classical-beacon schemes. The experiment is plausible and the correction concept is internally consistent for the thin-scatterer geometry. However, the absence of quantitative fidelity metrics and the restricted demonstration scope currently limit the strength of the claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 3 and Abstract] The abstract claims transmission 'with minimal errors,' but no quantitative fidelity or error metric is provided for the corrected high-dimensional state. The restored correlation peak in Fig. 3(g) is the sole evidence. Provide a quantitative measure (e.g., peak visibility, overlap fidelity, signal-to-noise ratio) with uncertainty, and specify raw acquisition parameters. Without this, the central claim of 'minimal errors' is asserted rather than demonstrated.
  2. [Section 3, Fig. 3 caption] The correlation images are 'denoised using a low-pass filter' without specifying the filter type or cutoff. Since the central evidence is the correlation peak in Fig. 3(g), the filtering could influence the apparent contrast. Show unfiltered images or quantify the filter's effect on the measured peak to rule out artifacts.
  3. [Section 5, Conclusion vs. Abstract/Introduction] The method is only demonstrated for a thin phase-only scatterer placed in the image plane of the SLM, and the conclusion explicitly acknowledges that thick or out-of-plane scatterers require multi-plane converters. However, the abstract and introduction frame the approach as suitable for 'real-world environments' and general 'optical distortion.' The claims should be calibrated to the demonstrated regime, or additional evidence for a more general scenario should be provided.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (3)] The quoted Schmidt number K≈37 for the high-dimensional state is computed from theory using stated parameters, not measured. Since the correction performance depends on K, an independent estimation (e.g., from correlation width) or at least a discussion of uncertainty would strengthen the characterization. Similarly, the low-K state's Schmidt number is not reported; a computed value using Eq. (3) with the focused pump waist would substantiate the claim that it mimics coherent light.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3] 'The SPDC beam is entangled in high dimensions and exhibits very low spatial incoherence' should likely read 'very low spatial coherence' or 'high spatial incoherence'; please clarify.
  2. [Section 5] The reference list appears as 'Ref. [22,22,48,49]' with a duplicated 22; check the citation numbering.
  3. [Section 4, Fig. 4] The simulations are performed in one spatial dimension. Please comment on whether two-dimensional effects are expected to alter the conclusions, or justify the 1D approximation.
  4. [Section 3] Lens L1 is described as an 'introduced' component to focus the pump. In the conclusion, the method is said to use 'no additional components beyond those already used for shaping entangled photon pairs.' Clarify whether L1 is considered part of the standard setup or an extra element, to avoid inconsistency.
  5. [Data Availability Statement] The data availability statement indicates data are not publicly available. For reproducibility, consider depositing representative raw correlation images and analysis code.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the transmission-matrix correction is measured on a low-Schmidt-number state and independently applied to a high-Schmidt-number state; no fitted parameter or self-citation chain forces the result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a low-Schmidt-number two-photon state, behaving like coherent classical light, can be used to measure the transmission matrix of a thin scattering medium, and then the same SLM phase pattern corrects and shapes a high-dimensional entangled two-photon state. This is not circular. The transmission matrix is extracted from intensity images of the low-Schmidt-number state (Fig. 2b and accompanying text: 'we measure a 1024×14641 matrix'), and the same phase pattern is applied when the pump is unfocused to generate the high-Schmidt-number state (Fig. 3g). No parameter appearing in the high-Schmidt-number correction is fitted to the high-Schmidt-number data; the correction is determined by the medium via the low-Schmidt-number probe. The Schmidt number K is computed from the externally stated Gaussian SPDC model (Eqs. 2–3, adapted from Ref. [39]), not fitted to the experimental outcomes. The physical justification that a single phase correction transfers from low-K to high-K states relies on the geometry of a thin phase-only scatterer in the image plane of the SLM. This is an explicit assumption, and the paper acknowledges its limitation in the conclusion: 'if the scatterer is thick or is not in the image plane of the SLM, the correction cannot be done optimally.' That is a scope condition, not a circular step. Self-citations appear (e.g., Refs. [41], [44], [45]) but only as methodological or contextual support, not as load-bearing justifications of the main result; the experimental observation of a restored correlation peak is direct evidence. Therefore no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the Gaussian SPDC model and the assumption that a thin-phase-scatterer transmission matrix is mode-independent. The low-K state is not quantitatively characterized, and the denoising parameters are undisclosed.

free parameters (2)
  • Focused pump waist at the crystal = not reported
    The low-Schmidt-number state is created by inserting lens L1 (10 cm focal length) to focus the pump, but the resulting waist w and the corresponding Schmidt number K are never given. The claim that the state 'mimics' a coherent beam is thus only qualitative.
  • Low-pass filter parameters for denoising correlation images = not specified
    The minus-coordinate projection images were denoised with an unspecified low-pass filter; the filter parameters affect the apparent sharpness of the restored correlation peak.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The SPDC two-photon wavefunction is well described by a double-Gaussian distribution in transverse position (Eq. 1)
    This standard model is taken from Refs 38 and 39 and is used to justify the coherence-entanglement transfer. It holds in the paraxial, thin-crystal regime.
  • domain assumption The first-order coherence function g(1) and Schmidt number K obey Eqs (2) and (3), adapted from Ref. 39
    These formulas assume Gaussian statistics and a specific phase-matching configuration; they are used to compute K≈37 in the collimated case.
  • ad hoc to paper A thin phase scatterer in the image plane of the SLM has a transmission matrix that is effectively common to all transverse Schmidt modes
    This assumption is not stated explicitly in the main text but is implied by the setup figure and the conclusion that thick or out-of-image-plane scatterers need multi-plane light converters. If the scatterer mixes modes, the correction measured with the low-K state would not transfer to the high-K state.
  • standard math TM-based wavefront shaping from Ref. 40, using intensity speckle feedback, correctly reconstructs the phase correction for the low-K state
    The method is well-established for classical coherent light; the paper relies on it without modification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wavefront correction of high-dimensional two-photon states via coherence-entanglement transfer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HTV3AQYV

@misc{pith2026250904170,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wavefront correction of high-dimensional two-photon states via coherence-entanglement transfer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HTV3AQYV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04170}
}
read the original abstract

Reliable transmission of quantum optical states through real-world environments is key for quantum communication and imaging. Yet, aberrations and scattering in the propagation path can scramble the transmitted signal and hinder its use. A typical strategy is to employ a classical beacon beam to learn and then correct for the wavefront distortions. However, relying on a separate light source increases the overhead in the experimental apparatus. Moreover, the beacon light must closely match the non-classical state in polarization, wavelength, and even temporal bandwidth, which is highly challenging in practice. Here, we introduce a fast and efficient wavefront correction approach where we use the quantum state itself to correct for optical distortion. Via pump shaping, we control the degree of entanglement in the spatially-entangled two-photon state so that it behaves either as a high-dimensional entangled state or as a classical coherent state. The latter case is used to efficiently measure the transmission matrix of the propagation channel and correct its distortions with a spatial light modulator, thereby enabling the transmission of the high-dimensional entangled state with minimal errors. Our approach paves the way for the practical implementation of quantum imaging and communication protocols based on high-dimensional spatially entangled states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04170 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup. The setup involves three parts. The first is the state preparation, where a spatially-entangled two-photon state is produced and shaped with a spatial light modulator (SLM). An ultraviolet laser serves as a pump that illuminates a 𝛽-Barium Borate crystal (BBO). The output is filtered by LPF (a long pass filter) to remove residual pump. The SLM is placed in the Fourier plane of the crystal output … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Wavefront correction for a low-Schmidt-number two-photon state. (a) Intensity image measured without the scattering medium. (b) Intensity speckle pattern obtained in the presence of the medium. (c) After wavefront correction, a focused spot appears in the intensity image. (d) Intensity image obtained using the SLM to simultaneously correct the wavefront and shape the beam into four foci.All images were acquired with… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Wavefront correction for a high-Schmidt-number two-photon state. The top row depicts the intensity images, and the bottom row depicts the spatially-resolved second-order correlation function 𝐺 (2) projected on the minus coordinates, for different experimental configurations. (a) Intensity image measured in the absence of a scattering medium, (b) with the scattering medium present and no correction applied (flat SLM)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulations to study the effects of Schmidt number 𝐾 on wavefront correction. (a) Normalized speckle contrast as a function of the state’s Schmidt number 𝐾. (b) Focusing enhancement factor (normalized) for a coherent state (𝐾 = 1) using the phase masks learned via stat…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement,

    M. Erhard, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement,” Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 365–381 (2020). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK London

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Transverse spatial entanglement in parametric down-conversion,

    S. P. Walborn and C. H. Monken, “Transverse spatial entanglement in parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A76, 062305 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Advances in quantum imaging,

    H. Defienne, W. P. Bowen, M. Chekhova,et al., “Advances in quantum imaging,” Nat. Photonics18, 1024–1036 (2024). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging,

    G. Brida, M. Genovese, and I. Ruo Berchera, “Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging,” Nat. Photonics 4, 227–230 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Quantumimagedistillation,

    H.Defienne, M.Reichert, J.W.Fleischer, andD.Faccio, “Quantumimagedistillation,” Sci.Adv. 5, eaax0307(2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Noise rejection through an improved quantum illumination protocol,

    T. Gregory, P.-A. Moreau, S. Mekhail,etal., “Noise rejection through an improved quantum illumination protocol,” Sci. reports11, 21841 (2021). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK London

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    A quantum-enhanced wide-field phase imager,

    R. Camphausen, A. Cuevas, L. Duempelmann,et al., “A quantum-enhanced wide-field phase imager,” Sci. Adv.7, eabj2155 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Resolution-enhanced quantum imaging by centroid estimation of biphotons,

    E. Toninelli, P.-A. Moreau, T. Gregory,et al., “Resolution-enhanced quantum imaging by centroid estimation of biphotons,” Optica6, 347–353 (2019). Publisher: Optical Society of America

    work page 2019

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Pixel super-resolution with spatially entangled photons,

    H. Defienne, P. Cameron, B. Ndagano,et al., “Pixel super-resolution with spatially entangled photons,” Nat. communications 13, 3566 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Quantum microscopy of cells at the Heisenberg limit,

    Z. He, Y. Zhang, X. Tong,et al., “Quantum microscopy of cells at the Heisenberg limit,” Nat. Commun.14, 2441 (2023). Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  3. [11]

    Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons,

    P. Cameron, B. Courme, C. Vernière,et al., “Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons,” Science383, 1142–1148 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Quick Quantum Steering: Overcoming Loss and Noise with Qudits,

    V. Srivastav, N. H. Valencia, W. McCutcheon,et al., “Quick Quantum Steering: Overcoming Loss and Noise with Qudits,” Phys. Rev. X12, 041023 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution,

    S. Ecker, F. Bouchard, L. Bulla,et al., “Overcoming noise in entanglement distribution,” Phys. Rev. X9, 041042 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Is high-dimensional photonic entanglement robust to noise?

    F. Zhu, M. Tyler, N. H. Valencia,etal., “Is high-dimensional photonic entanglement robust to noise?” AVS Quantum Sci. 3, 011401 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    High-Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges,

    D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, “High-Dimensional Quantum Communication: Benefits, Progress, and Future Challenges,” Adv. Quantum Technol.2, 1900038 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Two-photon quantum walk in a multimode fiber,

    H. Defienne, M. Barbieri, I. A. Walmsley,et al., “Two-photon quantum walk in a multimode fiber,” Sci. Adv.2, e1501054 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Adaptive quantum optics with spatially entangled photon pairs,

    H. Defienne, M. Reichert, and J. W. Fleischer, “Adaptive quantum optics with spatially entangled photon pairs,” Phys. review letters121, 233601 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Manipulation and Certification of High-Dimensional Entanglement through a Scattering Medium,

    B. Courme, P. Cameron, D. Faccio,et al., “Manipulation and Certification of High-Dimensional Entanglement through a Scattering Medium,” PRX Quantum4, 010308 (2023). Publisher: American Physical Society

    2023

  11. [19]

    Restoringandtailoringveryhighdimensionalspatialentanglement of a biphoton state transmitted through a scattering medium,

    F.Devaux,A.Mosset,S.M.Popoff,andE.Lantz,“Restoringandtailoringveryhighdimensionalspatialentanglement of a biphoton state transmitted through a scattering medium,” (2022). ArXiv:2206.00299 [physics, physics:quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Shaping the propagation of light in complex media,

    H. Cao, A. P. Mosk, and S. Rotter, “Shaping the propagation of light in complex media,” Nat. Phys.18, 994–1007 (2022). Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  13. [21]

    Imaging of objects through a thin scattering layer using a spectrally and spatially separated reference,

    X. Xu, X. Xie, A. Thendiyammal,etal., “Imaging of objects through a thin scattering layer using a spectrally and spatially separated reference,” Opt. express26, 15073–15083 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Spatiotemporal Coherent Control of Light through a Multiple Scattering Medium with the Multispectral Transmission Matrix,

    M. Mounaix, D. Andreoli, H. Defienne,et al., “Spatiotemporal Coherent Control of Light through a Multiple Scattering Medium with the Multispectral Transmission Matrix,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 253901 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Control of the temporal and polarization response of a multimode fiber,

    M. Mounaix and J. Carpenter, “Control of the temporal and polarization response of a multimode fiber,” Nat. Commun. 10, 1–8 (2019). Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2019

  16. [24]

    Polarization recovery through scattering media,

    H. B. d. Aguiar, S. Gigan, and S. Brasselet, “Polarization recovery through scattering media,” Sci. Adv.3, e1600743 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Focusingandcompressionofultrashortpulsesthroughscattering media,

    O.Katz,E.Small,Y.Bromberg,andY.Silberberg,“Focusingandcompressionofultrashortpulsesthroughscattering media,” Nat. Photonics5, 372–377 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    Focusing polychromatic light through strongly scattering media,

    H. P. Paudel, C. Stockbridge, J. Mertz, and T. Bifano, “Focusing polychromatic light through strongly scattering media,” Opt. express21, 17299–17308 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Deterministic light focusing in space and time through multiple scattering media with a time-resolved transmission matrix approach,

    M. Mounaix, H. Defienne, and S. Gigan, “Deterministic light focusing in space and time through multiple scattering media with a time-resolved transmission matrix approach,” Phys. Rev. A94, 041802 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Looking around corners and through thin turbid layers in real time with scattered incoherent light,

    O. Katz, E. Small, and Y. Silberberg, “Looking around corners and through thin turbid layers in real time with scattered incoherent light,” Nat. Photonics6, 549–553 (2012). Number: 8 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2012

  21. [29]

    Photon-sparse microscopy: visible light imaging using infrared illumination,

    R. S. Aspden, N. R. Gemmell, P. A. Morris,et al., “Photon-sparse microscopy: visible light imaging using infrared illumination,” Optica2, 1049–1052 (2015). Publisher: Optical Society of America

    2015

  22. [30]

    Quantum imaging and metrology with undetected photons: tutorial,

    G. B. Lemos, M. Lahiri, S. Ramelow,et al., “Quantum imaging and metrology with undetected photons: tutorial,” JOSA B39, 2200–2228 (2022). Publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2022

  23. [31]

    Duality between partial coherence and partial entanglement,

    B. E. Saleh, A. F. Abouraddy, A. V. Sergienko, and M. C. Teich, “Duality between partial coherence and partial entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A62, 043816 (2000)

    2000

  24. [32]

    Two-Photon Speckle as a Probe of Multi-Dimensional Entanglement,

    C. W. J. Beenakker, J. W. F. Venderbos, and M. P. van Exter, “Two-Photon Speckle as a Probe of Multi-Dimensional Entanglement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 193601 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Observation of Two-Photon Speckle Patterns,

    W. H. Peeters, J. J. D. Moerman, and M. P. van Exter, “Observation of Two-Photon Speckle Patterns,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    New scattering zones in quantum speckle propagation,

    S. Aarav, S. Wadood, and J. W. Fleischer, “New scattering zones in quantum speckle propagation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08408 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium,

    N. H. Valencia, S. Goel, W. McCutcheon,et al., “Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium,” Nat. Phys.16, 1112–1116 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Non-classical optimization through complex media,

    B. Courme, C. Vernière, M. Joly,et al., “Non-classical optimization through complex media,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24283 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Phase matching in𝛽-barium borate crystals for spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    S. Karan, S. Aarav, H. Bharadhwaj,et al., “Phase matching in𝛽-barium borate crystals for spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” J. Opt.22, 083501 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Gaussian modelling and schmidt modes of spdc biphoton states,

    M. Fedorov, Y. M. Mikhailova, and P. Volkov, “Gaussian modelling and schmidt modes of spdc biphoton states,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.42, 175503 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone,

    J. Schneeloch and J. C. Howell, “Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone,” J. Opt.18, 053501 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media,

    S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati,et al., “Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: An approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media,” Phys. review letters104, 100601 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    General model of photon-pair detection with an image sensor,

    H. Defienne, M. Reichert, and J. W. Fleischer, “General model of photon-pair detection with an image sensor,” Phys. review letters120, 203604 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera,

    M. P. Edgar, D. S. Tasca, F. Izdebski,et al., “Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera,” Nat. Commun. 3, 984 (2012). Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2012

  35. [43]

    Realization of the purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in full-field images of spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    P.-A. Moreau, J. Mougin-Sisini, F. Devaux, and E. Lantz, “Realization of the purely spatial Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in full-field images of spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A86, 010101 (2012)

    2012

  36. [44]

    Hiding images in quantum correlations,

    C. Vernière and H. Defienne, “Hiding images in quantum correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093601 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Shaping the spatial correlations of entangled photon pairs,

    P. Cameron, B. Courme, D. Faccio, and H. Defienne, “Shaping the spatial correlations of entangled photon pairs,” J. Physics: Photonics6, 033001 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media,

    I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, “Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media,” Opt. letters32, 2309–2311 (2007)

    2007

  39. [47]

    All-optically untangling light propagation through multimode fibers,

    H. Kupianskyi, S. A. Horsley, and D. B. Phillips, “All-optically untangling light propagation through multimode fibers,” Optica11, 101–112 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Spectral control of broadband light through random media by wavefront shaping,

    E. Small, O. Katz, Y. Guan, and Y. Silberberg, “Spectral control of broadband light through random media by wavefront shaping,” Opt. Lett.37, 3429 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Frequency bandwidth of light focused through turbid media,

    F. v. Beijnum, E. G. v. Putten, A. Lagendijk, and A. P. Mosk, “Frequency bandwidth of light focused through turbid media,” Opt. Lett.36, 373–375 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.