Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Spatial Patterning and Selection: How the Environment Shapes Molecular Complexity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spatial order raises the abiotic complexity ceiling

desk verdict The question is worthwhile and the integer-chemistry setup is reusable, but the paper reads its power-law tail exponent backwards, so the central topology claim fails as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04547 v1 pith:KVQ6SUO5 submitted 2025-09-04 physics.bio-ph nlin.AO

Alexandre Champagne-Ruel , Christopher P. Kempes , Cole Mathis This is my paper
classification physics.bio-phnlin.AO
keywords assemblytheoryindexartificialchemistryspatialpatterningdiffusiontopologylifedetectionoriginsof
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether spatial patterning alone—no biology involved—can push an abiotic chemical system toward the high molecular complexity that assembly theory treats as a sign of life. The authors build an artificial chemistry where molecules are integers and the assembly index is the minimal number of addition steps needed to build each integer, then simulate networks of connected reactor cells arranged either as a regular lattice or as a randomized graph. They report that ordered lattice topologies shift the distribution of assembly indices upward compared to randomized topologies, so spatial structure can raise the complexity ceiling of abiotic chemistry without any selective process. Diffusion acts as a double-edged sword: it supplies reactants but also flushes them out, and in the high-diffusion regime where topology matters most, improving instrument sensitivity would not tell a spatially generated false positive from a genuine biosignature. The practical upshot, if the integer proxy transfers to real molecules, is that life-detection thresholds need calibration against spatially structured abiotic controls.

What carries the argument

The central object is the addition-chain assembly index: for an integer z, the minimal length of an addition chain (a sequence starting at 1 where each term is the sum of two earlier terms) ending at z, bounded by log2(z) < A_z ≲ √2 log2(z). It is used as a conceptual lower bound for the assembly index of a covalent molecule with z bonds. The system is a network of 25 chemostats coupled by diffusion, with integers undergoing inflow, pairwise synthesis (A+B→C), decomposition (C→A+B), and outflow, evolved stochastically via τ-leaping. Topology is compared between a von Neumann lattice and a degree-preserving randomized graph; distribution tails are fit to power laws with exponent α, and the As

What would settle it

Compare the maximum assembly index detected by mass spectrometry in a well-mixed stirred reactor versus an identically fed compartmentalized porous reactor running the same abiotic chemistry; if the structured system does not exceed the well-mixed control's maximum assembly index at matched conversion, the claim that ordered spatial structure shifts the abiotic threshold upward is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that spatial arrangement of chemical reactors is itself a control parameter for molecular complexity. In simulations, regular lattice networks produce heavier-tailed distributions of assembly indices than degree-matched randomized networks, so ordered topology raises the maximum complexity achievable abiotically. The effect is regime-dependent: at very low diffusion the system acts like one well-mixed reactor; at intermediate diffusion constructive reactions are diluted; at high diffusion the whole topology is explored and the lattice-randomized difference is largest, while detectable maximum complexity at the outflow becomes nearly independent of detection sensitivity. The

Load-bearing premise

The argument holds only if the assembly index of an integer—the minimal number of additions to reach it—is a faithful lower-bound proxy for the assembly index of a real covalent molecule; the authors state that the two may represent distinct scales, and if that mapping fails, the simulated shifts in integer distributions do not transfer to false-positive risk in life detection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the integer-based proxy transfers to real molecules, life-detection missions should calibrate thresholds using abiotic controls with non-trivial spatial structure.
  • The intermediate-diffusion regime is the one that best supports high-assembly-index formation; experiments maximizing short-term yield may not reach maximum long-term complexity.
  • In the high-diffusion regime, topology has its strongest effect on assembly-index ceilings while detection sensitivity has the least effect, so improving mass resolution would be more useful than raising sensitivity for avoiding false positives.
  • Randomizing a lattice while preserving node degrees suppresses the tail of the assembly-index distribution, quantified by a steeper power-law exponent α.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The lattice-versus-randomized contrast suggests a 'topology fingerprint': other ordered networks (hierarchical, scale-free, or small-world) might raise the abiotic assembly-index ceiling further, and mapping that landscape could distinguish spatial complexity from biological selection without invoking life.
  • A testable prediction follows from the diffusion regimes: the topological effect should vanish at very low diffusion (where the inflow reactor dominates) and reappear at high diffusion, so microfluidic experiments with controlled connectivity could directly measure the predicted lattice-induced shift in maximum assembly index.
  • If the addition-chain lower bound is tight for real molecules, then spatially structured prebiotic environments like mineral sponges or hydrothermal vent labyrinths could be expected to produce molecular populations with heavier tails than well-mixed simulations, meaning current abiotic controls may underestimate the background complexity of non-living chemistry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a spatially extended artificial chemistry in which integers represent molecules and reactions are integer addition/decomposition. Species diffuse among nodes of a network that is either a regular 2D lattice or a degree-preserving randomization thereof, with inflow and outflow. The assembly index of each integer is computed via minimal addition chains, and the paper studies how the diffusion coefficient, inflow rate, and network topology shape the distribution of assembly indices and the system-level 'Assembly' metric. It claims that ordered lattices promote higher-AI species relative to randomized topologies and that diffusion impedes the formation and detection of high-AI molecules, with implications for avoiding false positives in assembly-theory-based life detection.

Significance. The question whether purely abiotic spatial structure can produce high-assembly-index distributions that mimic biosignatures is genuinely interesting and timely for astrobiology and for the ongoing discussion of assembly theory. The modeling approach is transparent, and the use of a degree-preserving edge-swap null model is a good control. The authors also acknowledge, explicitly, that the integer-addition-chain assembly index may live on a different scale from molecular assembly indices. However, the central topology conclusion is vitiated by an internal inconsistency in the interpretation of the power-law exponent (major comment 1), and the quantitative support for the claimed ordering is otherwise not established (major comment 2). The Eq. (4) discrepancy further weakens confidence in the auxiliary Assembly results. If the topological claim were sound, this would be a useful contribution; in its current form the main claim is not supported by the evidence in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 6C and accompanying text] The statement that a decrease in α for randomized topologies 'signifies a faster decline in distribution tails, indicating fewer species with high AI' is mathematically inverted. For a power law a x^{−α}, small α gives a flatter, heavier tail with more large-x mass; large α gives a steeper decay and fewer large-x species. The paper's own Fig. 6B caption says 'Higher values of the exponent α correspond to steeper distributions with fewer complex species.' Thus the larger decrease of α for randomized topologies at high kd implies randomized networks have more, not fewer, high-integer (high-AI) species. The conclusion that ordered lattices 'facilitate the formation of relatively higher AI species' and the abstract's claim that 'ordered lattices can shift the threshold for abiotic chemistry upward' are therefore contradicted by the quantitative evidence as presented.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 6C] The power-law comparison lacks statistical support. The fitting method is not specified, no confidence intervals or standard errors are given for α, and no significance test is reported for the lattice-vs-randomized difference. With only 20 binned points (z = 1–1000, bins of 50) and 100 runs per condition, the claimed difference could be sampling noise. Since this comparison is the sole quantitative basis for the central topology claim, the authors should provide the fitting procedure, error bars, and a test of whether the two curves in Fig. 6C are statistically distinguishable.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (4)] The Assembly definition is written as A = Σ_i e^{a_i} (n_i − 1)/N_T. The standard definition in the cited literature (Sharma et al. 2023) is e^{a_i} n_i / N_T. The subtraction of 1 is unexplained and removes singletons' contributions. As A and ΔA are used in Fig. 4A and the Discussion, this variant should be justified or corrected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6C caption and text] Typo: 'Powel-Law' should be 'Power-Law'. Also, in the main text, 'randomized topologies suppresses them' should be 'randomized topologies suppress them'.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 3D inset text] The statement that 'AI is proportional to the logarithm of the integer value, specifically a_z ∝ log_2(z)' is an oversimplification; Fig. 2 shows a_z is bounded between log_2(z) and sqrt(2) log_2(z). Please clarify that this is an approximate trend, not an equality.
  3. [Section II, Methods] The parameter reduction (kb ≡ 1, kd = ko, fixed kf = 10^-3) should be stated explicitly in the results or abstract so readers know the topology conclusions are specific to this parameter combination.
  4. [Section III, 'Assembly' heading] The heading 'Assembly' could be confused with the verb; consider 'System-level Assembly metric'.
  5. [Section III, topology discussion] The phrase 'destroying any high-level properties of the network' is vague; the edge-swap algorithm preserves the degree sequence, so specify which properties are meant (e.g., lattice order, symmetries, short cycles).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the simulation results are generated independently of the target conclusion, and the adopted assembly-theory metrics are used as summary statistics rather than as fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. It builds an artificial chemistry model with reactions defined in Table I, evolves integer populations via stochastic simulation, and then computes the assembly index of integers as minimal addition-chain length and the Assembly metric via Eq. (4). These metrics are imported from prior work (Marshall et al. 2021; Sharma et al. 2023; Marshall et al. 2022), including work co-authored by the present authors, but they are used as measurement/summary statistics, not as fitted parameters or as the conclusion itself. The central claim about ordered versus randomized topologies is obtained by comparing power-law exponents fitted to simulated distributions in Fig. 6C; that comparison is a post hoc characterization, not an input to the simulation. The authors explicitly flag the non-trivial mapping between integer AI and molecular AI ('assembly indices computed here and the assembly indices of covalent molecules may represent distinct scales'), so the proxy assumption is disclosed rather than smuggled. No step reduces by construction to its own input: A is defined in terms of AI, but the AI distributions are outputs of the dynamics, not definitions. The apparent inversion in interpreting alpha (smaller alpha corresponds to a heavier tail) is a potential internal-consistency/correctness concern, but it is not a circularity because it does not make any equation equal to its input or any fitted parameter the predicted quantity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has several hand-chosen parameters and relies on an accepted mapping from integers to assembly space. No new physical entities are postulated. The power-law exponent alpha is a fitted statistic, not a model parameter, but its interpretation is central to the claims.

free parameters (5)
  • kf (forward reaction rate) = 10^-3
    Set to a constant value for all simulations; not fitted to data but chosen by hand.
  • I (inflow rate) = 10^3 to 10^4 (log I in {3,4})
    Varied in some simulations; a hand-chosen range to represent different source strengths.
  • kb (backward reaction rate) = 1 (normalized)
    Normalized to 1 to reduce parameter space; affects overall reaction balance.
  • kd = ko (diffusion and outflow rate) = log kd in {-4,...,1}
    Varied across simulations; central to the claims about diffusion regimes.
  • Network size N = 25 reactors
    Chosen for computational tractability; results may depend on system size.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Reactions obey mass action kinetics with uniform rate constants for all integer sizes.
    Assumed to isolate spatial effects, but real rate constants vary by orders of magnitude. The authors acknowledge this as a simplification.
  • domain assumption Integer addition-chain length is a lower-bound proxy for molecular assembly index.
    Borrowed from Marshall et al. 2022; the authors concede the mapping is non-trivial and may represent distinct scales.
  • standard math Tau-leaping accurately approximates the chemical master equation for this system.
    Standard stochastic simulation method, but the approximation error is not quantified.
  • domain assumption Edge-swapping randomization preserves relevant network properties.
    Used as a null control; may not preserve higher-order structures such as clustering, which could influence the comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatial Patterning and Selection: How the Environment Shapes Molecular Complexity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVQ6SUO5

@misc{pith2026250904547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatial Patterning and Selection: How the Environment Shapes Molecular Complexity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVQ6SUO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04547}
}
read the original abstract

Assembly theory predicts that a distinguishing signature of life is its ability to produce complex molecules in abundance, opening new possibilities for life detection. Experimental validation of this approach has so far relied on abiotic controls like meteoritic material, or simple, well-mixed chemical systems. However, decades of research in self-organization have shown that spatial patterning can foster dynamical self-organization. This raises the possibility that systems with nontrivial spatial patterns might promote abiotic formation of molecules with higher than expected assembly indices, potentially leading to false positives in life detection approaches based on assembly theory. To explore this, we used a model of artificial chemistry to investigate how spatial organization can influence the development of molecular assembly indices. Our findings reveal that transport factors, such as diffusion, significantly affect the distribution of chemical species within a system. Additionally, system topology critically impacts the distribution of assembly indices: while it does not enable arbitrary complexity, ordered lattices can shift the threshold for abiotic chemistry upward. Moreover, we demonstrate that diffusion can impede the formation and detection of these high assembly index molecules, bearing important implications for life detection experiments and astrobiological missions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Computation of the assembly index for inte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. C illustrates the variations in both the number of molecules and mass across different dif￾fusion regimes. At low diffusion regimes, where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mean Assembly Index of molecules as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Diagnostic plots showing the proportion of skipped reaction attempts for each reaction type: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author S. M. \ Marshall , author C. Mathis , author E. Carrick , author G. Keenan , author G. J. T. \ Cooper , author H. Graham , author M. Craven , author P. S. \ Gromski , author D. G. \ Moore , author S. I. \ Walker , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.1038/s41467-021-23258-x journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 3033 ( year 2021...

    doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23258-x 2021

  2. [2]

    Sharma , author D

    author author A. Sharma , author D. Cz \'e gel , author M. Lachmann , author C. P. \ Kempes , author S. I. \ Walker , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.1038/s41586-023-06600-9 journal journal Nature \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06600-9 2023

  3. [3]

    Determining Molecular Complexity using Assembly Theory and Spectroscopy

    author author M. Jirasek , author A. Sharma , author J. R. \ Bame , author N. Bell , author S. M. \ Marshall , author C. Mathis , author A. Macleod , author G. J. T. \ Cooper , author M. Swart , author R. Mollfulleda , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13753 title Multimodal Techniques for Detecting Alien Life using Assembly Theory and Spectr...

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13753 2023

  4. [4]

    author author N. B. \ Dragone , author M. A. \ Diaz , author I. D. \ Hogg , author W. B. \ Lyons , author W. A. \ Jackson , author D. H. \ Wall , author B. J. \ Adams , \ and\ author N. Fierer ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences \ volume 126 ,\ pages e2020JG006052 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Ratliff , author A

    author author L. Ratliff , author A. Fulford , author C. Pozarycki , author G. Wimp , author F. Nichols , author M. Osburn , \ and\ author H. Graham ,\ @noop journal journal bioRxiv \ ,\ pages 2023 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    author author E. A. \ Bell , author P. Boehnke , author T. M. \ Harrison , \ and\ author W. L. \ Mao ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1517557112 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 112 ,\ pages 14518 ( year 2015 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1517557112 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1517...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1517557112 2015

  7. [7]

    author author J. J. \ Fortney , author T. D. \ Robinson , author S. Domagal-Goldman , author A. D. D. \ Genio , author I. E. \ Gordon , author E. Gharib-Nezhad , author N. Lewis , author C. Sousa-Silva , author V. Airapetian , author B. Drouin , author R. J. \ Hargreaves , author X. Huang , author T. Karman , author R. M. \ Ramirez , author G. B. \ Rieker...

    arXiv 1905

  8. [8]

    Critical Laboratory Studies to Advance Planetary Science and Support Missions

    author author E. Fayolle , author L. Barge , author M. Cable , author B. Drouin , author J. Dworkin , author J. Hanley , author B. Henderson , author B. Journaux , author A. Noell , author F. Salama , author E. Sciamma-O'Brien , author S. Waller , author J. Weber , author C. Bennett , author J. Blum , author M. Gudipati , author S. Milam , author M. Melwa...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Matreux , author K

    author author T. Matreux , author K. LeVay , author A. Schmid , author P. Aikkila , author L. Belohlavek , author A. Z. \ C al s kano g lu , author E. Salibi , author A. K \"u hnlein , author C. Springsklee , author B. Scheu , author D. B. \ Dingwell , author D. Braun , author...

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Matreux , author P

    author author T. Matreux , author P. Aikkila , author B. Scheu , author D. Braun , \ and\ author C. B. \ Mast ,\ 10.1038/s41586-024-07193-7 journal journal Nature \ volume 628 ,\ pages 110 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    author author A. M. \ Turing ,\ 10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 journal journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences \ volume 237 ,\ pages 37 ( year 1952 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/92463 92463 NoStop

    1952

  4. [12]

    Boerlijst \ and\ author P

    author author M. Boerlijst \ and\ author P. Hogeweg ,\ 10.1016/0167-2789(91)90049-F journal journal Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena \ volume 48 ,\ pages 17 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991 doi

  5. [13]

    author author E. S. \ Colizzi \ and\ author P. Hogeweg ,\ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004902 journal journal PLOS Computational Biology \ volume 12 ,\ pages e1004902 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  6. [14]

    author author M. A. \ Nowak \ and\ author R. M. \ May ,\ 10.1142/S0218127493000040 journal journal International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos \ volume 03 ,\ pages 35 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  7. [15]

    Lindgren \ and\ author M

    author author K. Lindgren \ and\ author M. G. \ Nordahl ,\ 10.1016/0167-2789(94)90289-5 journal journal Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena \ volume 75 ,\ pages 292 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  8. [16]

    Mizuuchi \ and\ author N

    author author R. Mizuuchi \ and\ author N. Ichihashi ,\ 10.1038/s41559-018-0650-z journal journal Nature Ecology & Evolution \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1654 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Champagne-Ruel \ and\ author P

    author author A. Champagne-Ruel \ and\ author P. Charbonneau ,\ 10.3390/life12020254 journal journal Life \ volume 12 ,\ pages 254 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Asche , author R

    author author S. Asche , author R. W. \ Pow , author H. M. \ Mehr , author G. J. T. \ Cooper , author A. Sharma , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.1002/syst.202400006 journal journal ChemSystemsChem \ volume n/a ,\ pages e202400006 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Hashiguchi , author D

    author author M. Hashiguchi , author D. Aoki , author K. Fukushima , author H. Naraoka , author Y. Takano , author J. P. \ Dworkin , author K. E. \ Dworkin , author J. C. \ Aponte , author J. E. \ Elsila , author J. M. \ Eiler , author Y. Furukawa , author A. Furusho , author ...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Rasmussen , author J

    author author B. Rasmussen , author J. R. \ Muhling , \ and\ author N. J. \ Tosca ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.adj4789 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 10 ,\ pages eadj4789 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Liu \ and\ author D

    author author Y. Liu \ and\ author D. J. T. \ Sumpter ,\ 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003795 journal journal Journal of Biological Chemistry \ volume 293 ,\ pages 18854 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Banzhaf \ and\ author L

    author author W. Banzhaf \ and\ author L. Yamamoto ,\ @noop title Artificial Chemistries \ ( publisher The MIT Press ,\ address Cambridge, MA ,\ year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  15. [23]

    Albert \ and\ author A.-L

    author author R. Albert \ and\ author A.-L. \ Barab \'a si ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 journal journal Reviews of modern physics \ volume 74 ,\ pages 47 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    \ Barab \'a si \ and\ author M

    author author A.-L. \ Barab \'a si \ and\ author M. P \'o sfai ,\ @noop title Network Science ,\ edition 1st \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge, United Kingdom ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  17. [25]

    Rodriguez-Garcia , author A

    author author M. Rodriguez-Garcia , author A. J. \ Surman , author G. J. T. \ Cooper , author I. Su \'a rez-Marina , author Z. Hosni , author M. P. \ Lee , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.1038/ncomms9385 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 6 ,\ pages 8385 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    author author D. T. \ Gillespie ,\ 10.1021/j100540a008 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry \ volume 81 ,\ pages 2340 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977 doi

  19. [27]

    author author D. T. \ Gillespie ,\ 10.1063/1.1378322 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 115 ,\ pages 1716 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    author author S. M. \ Marshall , author D. G. \ Moore , author A. R. G. \ Murray , author S. I. \ Walker , \ and\ author L. Cronin ,\ 10.3390/e24070884 journal journal Entropy \ volume 24 ,\ pages 884 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    author author E. G. \ Thurber ,\ 10.1137/S0097539795295663 journal journal SIAM Journal on Computing \ volume 28 ,\ pages 1247 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  22. [30]

    Toffoli \ and\ author N

    author author T. Toffoli \ and\ author N. Margolus ,\ @noop title Cellular automata machines: a new environment for modeling \ ( publisher MIT press ,\ year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  23. [31]

    \ Lambert ,\ 10.1007/s11084-008-9128-3 journal journal Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres \ volume 38 ,\ pages 211 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    author author J.-F. \ Lambert ,\ 10.1007/s11084-008-9128-3 journal journal Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres \ volume 38 ,\ pages 211 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  24. [32]

    Dujardin , author S

    author author A. Dujardin , author S. Himbert , author R. Pudritz , \ and\ author M. C. \ Rheinst \"a dter ,\ 10.3390/life13010112 journal journal Life \ volume 13 ,\ pages 112 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    do Nascimento Vieira , author K

    author author A. do Nascimento Vieira , author K. Kleinermanns , author W. F. \ Martin , \ and\ author M. Preiner ,\ 10.1002/1873-3468.13815 journal journal FEBS Letters \ volume 594 ,\ pages 2717 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  26. [34]

    Chogani \ and\ author O

    author author A. Chogani \ and\ author O. Pl \"u mper ,\ 10.1007/s00410-023-02062-4 journal journal Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology \ volume 178 ,\ pages 78 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    \ Lee , author T

    author author H.-E. \ Lee , author T. Okumura , author H. Ooka , author K. Adachi , author T. Hikima , author K. Hirata , author Y. Kawano , author H. Matsuura , author M. Yamamoto , author M. Yamamoto , author A. Yamaguchi , author J.-E. \ Lee , author H. Takahashi , author K...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Pital , author M

    author author A. Pital , author M. Bromley , author M. Dorn , author J. Kim , \ and\ author A. Stockton ,\ 10.1089/ast.2021.0088 journal journal Astrobiology \ volume 24 ,\ pages 138 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2021

  29. [37]

    Tallarek , author D

    author author U. Tallarek , author D. Hlushkou , author N. Trebel , \ and\ author A. H \"o ltzel ,\ 10.1002/cite.202300027 journal journal Chemie Ingenieur Technik \ volume 95 ,\ pages 1777 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Zhao , author H

    author author R. Zhao , author H. Xue , author S. Lu , author H. C. \ Greenwell , author Y. Xu , author T. He , \ and\ author V. Erastova ,\ 10.1063/5.0226864 journal journal Physics of Fluids \ volume 36 ,\ pages 092027 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    author author A. M. \ Plum , author C. P. \ Kempes , author Z. Peng , \ and\ author D. A. \ Baum ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2212.14445 title Spatial Structure Supports Diversity in Prebiotic Autocatalytic Chemical Ecosystems , \ ( year 2024 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14445 arXiv:221...

    2024 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Peng \ and\ author Z

    author author Z. Peng \ and\ author Z. R. \ Adam ,\ 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114955 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 184 ,\ pages 114955 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  33. [41]

    Foote , author P

    author author S. Foote , author P. Sinhadc , author C. Mathis , \ and\ author S. I. \ Walker ,\ 10.1089/ast.2023.0005 journal journal Astrobiology \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1189 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  34. [42]

    author author S. F. \ Jordan , author M. A. \ van Zuilen , author J. Rouillard , author Z. Martins , \ and\ author N. Lane ,\ @noop journal journal Communications Earth & Environment \ volume 5 ,\ pages 234 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  35. [43]

    Matange , author V

    author author K. Matange , author V. Rajaei , author P. Capera-Aragones , author J. T. \ Costner , author A. Robertson , author J. S. \ Kim , author A. S. \ Petrov , author J. C. \ Bowman , author L. D. \ Williams , \ and\ author M. Frenkel-Pinter ,\ @noop journal journal Natu...

    2025

  36. [44]

    author author D. M. \ Jennewein , author J. Lee , author C. Kurtz , author W. Dizon , author I. Shaeffer , author A. Chapman , author A. Chiquete , author J. Burks , author A. Carlson , author N. Mason , author A. Kobawala , author T. Jagadeesan , author P. B. \ Basani , autho...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.