Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Large N Chern-Simons-matter fixed points with multiple flavors

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper computes the first nontrivial beta functions for the three marginal couplings of multi-flavor Chern-Simons-matter theories, and shows their IR-stable fixed points can merge and disappear at a critical 't Hooft coupling…

desk verdict Substantial multi-flavor extension of the N_f=1 Chern-Simons-matter fixed-point analysis, with solid beta functions at weak coupling and a headline merging result that rests on an honestly flagged uncontrolled truncation. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04565 v1 pith:THXOTLPZ submitted 2025-09-04 hep-th

Ofer Aharony , Ronny Frumkin , Jonathan Mehl This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords Chern-Simons-mattertheorylargeNlimitconformalfixedpointsmarginaloperatorsbetafunctionfixed-pointannihilationSemi-Criticaltheories'tHooftcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At infinite $N_c$, the quasi-bosonic Chern-Simons-matter theories have three flavor-singlet marginal couplings that are exactly marginal; for large finite $N_c$ they run, and the paper asks whether they flow to infrared-stable fixed points. The paper computes the $\beta$ functions for these couplings at leading order in $1/N_c$, showing they are cubic polynomials whose fixed-point structure depends on $N_f$ and on the 't Hooft coupling $\lambda$. For the regular boson theory at small $\lambda_B$, an IR-stable fixed point exists for $N_f=2$ and $N_f\ge 5$, but not for $N_f=3,4$. In the large-$N_f$ double-scaling limit $\lambda=4\pi l_0/N_f$, two pairs of fixed points merge and annihilate at $l_0=6$, i.e. at $|\lambda_B|=24\pi/N_f$, giving an explicit example of a conformal fixed point disappearing as the gauge coupling grows. The same formalism computes the $\beta$ functions of the Semi-Critical theories, where IR-stable fixed points appear in several regimes.

What carries the argument

The paper's central tool is the effective action for the matrix-valued auxiliary field $\zeta^i_j$ (the multi-flavor generalization of the single-flavor $\zeta$), obtained by integrating out matter and gauge fields. The coefficients $G_n$ of this action feed the leading-$1/N_c$ $\beta$ functions (4.22): constant terms from $G_5$ and $\delta G_3$, linear terms from anomalous dimensions and $G_4$, and cubic terms from $G_3^3$. For the regular boson theory at $\lambda_B=0$, only two diagram topologies survive and give the polynomial system (5.2); the small-$\lambda_B$ corrections from the 1134 two-loop diagrams are summarized in (5.3). The double-scaling limit $\lambda=4\pi l_0/N_f$ yields the reduced system (5.16), whose roots move with $l_0$ and merge at $l_0=6$.

What would settle it

Compute the $\beta$ functions to the next subleading order in $1/N_f$ (or next order in $\lambda$) in the double-scaling limit (5.16); if the IR-stable fixed point and its partner do not collide at $l_0=6$ for any large finite $N_f$, the explicit annihilation described in Section 5.4.3 is an artifact of the truncation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Generalizing the $N_f=1$ analysis, the paper establishes that multi-flavor quasi-bosonic theories (regular bosons, and their fermionic dual, critical fermions) are governed by three marginal couplings $\lambda_{SSS},\lambda_{SAA},\lambda_{AAA}$; their $\beta$ functions at order $1/N_c$ are third-degree polynomials with a universal cubic term. In the weakly coupled regular boson limit $\lambda_B\to 0$, the degenerate free-theory fixed point splits: for $N_f=2$ and $N_f\ge5$ one of the resulting points is IR-stable, while for $N_f=3,4$ there is no IR-stable point. In the large-$N_f$ limit with $\lambda=4\pi l_0/N_f$, the paper tracks the IR-stable fixed point explicitly and shows that it merges with another fixed point at $l_0=6$, corresponding to $|\lambda_B|=24\pi/N_f$, after which the pair disappears; it also gives a topological argument that fixed points can only appear or disappear in pairs. On the fermionic side, the critical fermion theory at $\lambda_F=0$ has no IR-stable fixed point for any $N_f>1$. For the two Semi-Critical theories the paper computes single-coupling $\beta$ functions and finds IR-stable points in several regions, including an $N_f=3$ adjoint theory that is IR-stable for every value of $\lambda$.

Load-bearing premise

The merger at $|\lambda_B|=24\pi/N_f$ rests on the assumption that the $\beta$ functions (5.16), which are not a well-defined perturbative expansion, still capture the leading $1/N_f$ contribution of each term separately.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At small $|\lambda_B|$, the regular boson theory has an IR-stable fixed point for $N_f=2$ and $N_f\ge5$, and none for $N_f=3,4$.
  • Increasing $|\lambda_B|$ past $24\pi/N_f$ at large $N_f$ destroys the IR-stable fixed point, so the quasi-bosonic CFT exists only below a critical 't Hooft coupling.
  • In the weakly coupled fermionic description ($\lambda_F\to0$), no IR-stable fixed point exists for any $N_f>1$, so any stable point on that side must appear at finite coupling.
  • Poincaré-Hopf index conservation forces fixed points to merge in pairs before disappearing, which is the mechanism realized at $l_0=6$.
  • The Semi-Critical theories acquire IR-stable fixed points in several regimes; in particular the $N_f=3$ adjoint theory is IR-stable for all $\lambda_B$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the paper's implicit conjecture: computing the next correction in $1/N_f$ to (5.16) will show whether the annihilation stays at $l_0=6$ or shifts by a calculable $O(1/N_f)$ amount; the paper does not address this.
  • For $N_f=3,4$, the absence of an IR-stable point at small $\lambda_B$ does not rule one out at strong coupling; the fermion-scalar duality implies the theory at $\lambda_B\to1$ is the weakly coupled critical fermion theory, where the paper finds no stable point either, so this question remains open.
  • The same cubic-polynomial and index-counting machinery should apply to SO($N_c$) and to mixed scalar-fermion theories; those are extensions not treated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes 2+1d SU(N_c) Chern-Simons-matter theories with N_f fundamental flavors in the large-N_c limit, focusing on the quasi-bosonic RB and CF theories and their Semi-Critical descendants. The authors generalize the N_f=1 analysis of Aharony-Jain-Minwalla: they derive the general form of the beta functions for the three marginal couplings at leading order in 1/N_c, compute them explicitly in the limits λ_B=0 and λ_B≪1 for the RB theory and λ_F=0 for the CF theory, and classify the resulting fixed points by their stability. The main quantitative results are that the CF theory has no IR-stable fixed point for any N_f>1, that the RB theory has an IR-stable fixed point at small λ_B for N_f=2 and N_f≥5 but not for N_f=3,4, and that in a large-N_f double-scaling limit an IR-stable fixed point merges with another fixed point and disappears at λ_crit≈24π/N_f. The Semi-Critical theories are also analyzed; their beta functions depend on an unknown five-point-function coefficient s_5. The appendices contain the full diagrammatic computations, including Feynman rules, renormalization conditions, and the evaluation of the relevant correlation functions.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a substantial extension of the Chern-Simons-matter fixed-point program. It provides an exact large-N_c framework for multi-flavor quasi-bosonic theories with three marginal couplings, gives a concrete analytic example of fixed-point annihilation, and derives topological constraints on how fixed points can split or merge as the 't Hooft coupling is varied. The paper is technically careful and unusually candid: the general beta-function structure is derived in closed form, the N_f=1 limit is reproduced, the λ_B=0 results are checked against the free-theory degeneracy, and the appendices supply detailed diagrammatic bookkeeping. The main quantitative claim, however, the merging at λ_crit=24π/N_f, rests on an uncontrolled truncation that the authors themselves identify. Because that claim is the headline result, the present version needs additional work before the quantitative merging statement can be accepted as derived rather than conjectured.

major comments (1)
  1. [5.4.3, Eq. (5.16), footnote 38] The derivation of the fixed-point merging at λ_crit=24π/N_f is not a systematic expansion. The authors state that the beta functions (5.16), obtained by adding the cubic terms of (5.2) to the small-λ results (5.3), 'will not yield a well defined expression in perturbation theory.' The footnote justifies the procedure only for the constant term in β_SSS; for the linear and quadratic terms it asserts, without demonstration, that omitted O(λ^2) corrections are subleading in 1/N_f. In the double-scaling limit λ=4πl_0/N_f, a correction δβ_SSS ⊃ c_2'(N_f)(λ/4π)^4 λ_SSS has size c_2'(N_f) l_0^4 y_SSS / N_f^6 before the factor N_f^3 used in (5.16), so it contributes at O(1) if c_2'(N_f) grows as N_f^3 or faster. The paper neither computes c_2'(N_f) nor proves an upper bound on its N_f scaling. The same concern applies to O(λ^2) corrections to the quadratic and cubic terms. Since the coefficients 384 and 1024 in (5.16) determine the discriminant 36−l_0^2 and hence the merging value l_0=6, the quantitative claim λ_crit=24π/N_f is load-bearing and is not yet established. The authors should either prove the required N_f scalings of all omitted terms or explicitly present the merging as a conjecture supported by (5.16).
minor comments (5)
  1. [5.4.3, Eq. (5.15) vs. 5.21] The symbol y_SSS, y_SAA, y_AAA is used with different normalizations: in (5.15) it denotes N_f-scaled couplings, while in (5.21) the same symbols denote shifted N_c-scaled couplings Y_n. This is a source of confusion and the two sets should be renamed.
  2. [4.4, Eq. (4.26)] The statement that the scalings (2/3,1/3,0), (1,1,0), and (2,1,0) are the only allowed ones can be misread as forbidding the (0,1,0) scaling used later in (5.14). The authors do explain that (4.26) assumes N_f→∞ at fixed λ, while (5.3) assumes λ≪1/N_f^2, but this caveat should appear immediately before (4.26) rather than in the later discussion.
  3. [5.4.3, Fig. 14] Figure 14 is described as including 'next order corrections that break the degeneracy,' but those corrections are not written down or specified. The caption should state exactly which system was solved to produce the plot; as it stands, the figure appears to rely on an unspecified numerical or analytic input.
  4. [7.2.1, Eq. (7.9)] The inequality (7.9) is correct as a condition on the unknown sum s_5,F+s_5,N, but the bounds are given in a form that obscures the fact that the right-hand side is positive and the left-hand side is negative for all N_f≥2. Rewriting the condition in terms of the explicit N_f limits would make the discussion in the following paragraph easier to follow.
  5. [3.2, Eq. (3.11)] The prefactor discussion around [49,50] is useful, but the small typo in [49] and the distinction between SO(N_c), SU(N_c), and U(N_c) groups could be moved to a footnote; the main text would read more smoothly without this technical digression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the beta functions are computed from the action by diagrammatic perturbation theory, and the fixed-point claims are derived rather than imposed.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense: the beta functions (5.2), (5.3), (6.2), and the Semi-Critical results (7.8), (7.11), (7.13), (7.16) are obtained by explicit Feynman-diagram computations in Appendices A-C, with no parameter fitted to the fixed-point data and no coupling tuned to produce a designated IR-stable point. The N_f=1 reduction reproduces previously known, independently derived results (3.8), (3.10), (3.11), including the external results [47-50], which strongly indicates that the multi-flavor coefficients were not chosen to force the paper's conclusions. Unknown quantities such as s_{5,N} and s_{5,F} are explicitly left undetermined and appear as free parameters in the Semi-Critical discriminant conditions (7.9) and (7.14); the authors state that they cannot determine the existence of an IR-stable fixed point in some cases, rather than adjusting these unknowns to obtain a desired answer. The double-scaling beta functions (5.16) are admittedly an uncontrolled truncation formed by adding the cubic terms of (5.2) to the small-lambda result (5.3), and the paper explicitly warns that this is not a well-defined perturbative expansion. This is an approximation whose validity is a correctness risk, not a circularity: the merging value l_0=6 is solved from the polynomial discriminant 36-l_0^2, not inserted by hand, and the claim is presented as following from that truncation. The heavy citation of [25] is legitimate reuse of a previously developed formalism and of the N_f=1 conjecture; the new multi-flavor fixed-point analysis is computed within the present paper and does not reduce to an unverified self-citation. No step was found where a prediction is equivalent by construction to an input, where a fitted parameter is renamed a prediction, or where a uniqueness claim is imported solely from the authors' prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. The auxiliary fields sigma and zeta are inherited from the N_f=1 formalism of [25]. The central claims depend on standard large-N expansion assumptions, the conjectured bosonization dualities, and one ad hoc truncation for the double-scaling merger analysis. The only independent numerical inputs that remain undetermined are the five-point function coefficients s_5,F and s_5,N, which the paper explicitly identifies as open inputs.

free parameters (1)
  • s_5,F and s_5,N (five-point function coefficients)
    Undetermined coefficients of the five-point meson correlation function at lambda_B=0, defined in (B.11) and (B.15). They enter the semi-critical beta functions (7.8) and (7.13); the conclusions about IR-stable fixed points for the CBA and CBS theories at lambda_B=0 are conditional on their values through inequalities (7.9) and (7.14).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The leading 1/N_c beta functions for the marginal couplings are exact to all orders in the marginal couplings and are cubic polynomials, as established for N_f=1 in [25].
    Invoked in Section 4.3, item 1 ('the beta functions found are exact to all orders in lambda_SSS, lambda_SAA, lambda_AAA'). The paper generalizes this structure to N_f>1 without re-proving it.
  • domain assumption The RB/CF and CB/RF dualities (2.17) hold in the 't Hooft limit, so fixed-point conclusions at lambda_B->0 and lambda_F->0 describe the same theory at opposite ends of the coupling range.
    Section 2.3 states 'There is strong evidence that there is a duality...' and the paper uses it to interpolate between weak and strong coupling. This is a conjecture inherited from the literature, not proven here.
  • domain assumption At lambda_F=0, the RF theory is free and parity invariant, forcing all odd meson correlation functions to vanish.
    Section 6.1: 'all correlation functions with an odd number of mesons are equal to minus themselves, and so they need to be zero.' This removes constant terms from the CF beta functions (6.2) and underlies the absence of IR-stable fixed points on the fermionic side.
  • domain assumption Standard planar large-N_c counting: only single-loop (maximal-N_c) topologies contribute at leading order, and flavor structure multiplies the same momentum integrals as in N_f=1.
    Sections 4.1.2 through 4.1.4 and Appendix A.2; this is the standard 't Hooft large-N expansion for vector-like matter.
  • ad hoc to paper The double-scaling beta functions (5.16), obtained by adding the cubic terms of (5.2) to the small-lambda results (5.3), capture the leading 1/N_f contributions in the limit lambda=4*pi*l_0/N_f.
    Section 5.4.3. The authors explicitly say this is not a well-defined perturbative expression; the fixed-point merging at l_0=6 depends on this assumption.
  • standard math The two-point coefficient G_2 is positive by unitarity, fixing the sign of the cubic terms in the beta functions.
    Used in Section 4.3 item 5: 'G_2 is always positive by unitarity.' This is a standard physical unitarity assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large N Chern-Simons-matter fixed points with multiple flavors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/THXOTLPZ

@misc{pith2026250904565,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large N Chern-Simons-matter fixed points with multiple flavors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/THXOTLPZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04565}
}
abstract

In this paper we analyze the $2+1$d conformal fixed points arising from $SU(N_c)$ Chern-Simons-matter theories with multiple flavors $N_f > 1$ in the 't Hooft large $N_c$ limit. The multi-flavor generalization of quasi-fermionic theories (fermions or critical scalars coupled to Chern-Simons gauge fields) is straightforward, but this is not true for quasi-bosonic theories (scalars or critical fermions coupled to Chern-Simons gauge fields). The latter theories have three flavor-singlet relevant operators and also three marginal operators, that become exactly marginal for infinite $N_c$, but have a non-zero beta function at order $1/N_c$. We compute the beta functions of these couplings in various weak coupling limits, and discuss also their general structure, generalizing previous computations for $N_f=1$. We find that IR-stable fixed points of the marginal couplings exist for some values of $N_f$ and of the 't Hooft coupling $\lambda$, but not for other values, and in one case we can explicitly follow how two pairs of fixed points merge and disappear as $\lambda$ is increased. We also analyze the ``Semi-Critical'' conformal field theories that arise when fine-tuning two (rather than three) relevant operators, and compute the beta function for their (single) marginal coupling constant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giombi, S

    S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S.P. Trivedi, S.R. Wadia and X. Yin, Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2112 [ 1110.4386]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Aharony, G

    O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, Correlation Functions of Large N Chern-Simons-Matter Theories and Bosonization in Three Dimensions , JHEP 12 (2012) 028 [1207.4593]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

    O. Aharony, Baryons, monopoles and dualities in Chern-Simons-matter theories , JHEP 02 (2016) 093 [ 1512.00161]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Seiberg, T

    N. Seiberg, T. Senthil, C. Wang and E. Witten, A Duality Web in 2+1 Dimensions and Condensed Matter Physics , Annals Phys. 374 (2016) 395 [ 1606.01989]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Constraining Conformal Field Theories with A Higher Spin Symmetry, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214011 [ 1112.1016]

    arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry , Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 104003 [ 1204.3882]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Klebanov and A.M

    I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model , Phys. Lett. B 550 (2002) 213 [ hep-th/0210114]

    arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Massless higher spins and holography , Nucl. Phys. B 644 (2002) 303 [hep-th/0205131]

    arXiv 2002

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin, Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions, JHEP 09 (2010) 115 [ 0912.3462]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Chang, S

    C.-M. Chang, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma and X. Yin, ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings, J. Phys. A 46 (2013) 214009 [ 1207.4485]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Giombi, Higher Spin — CFT Duality , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings , pp

    S. Giombi, Higher Spin — CFT Duality , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings , pp. 137–214, 2017, DOI [1607.02967]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Giveon and D

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 812 (2009) 1 [ 0808.0360]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Closset and S. Cremonesi, Comments on 3d Seiberg-like dualities , JHEP 10 (2011) 075 [ 1108.5373]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Park and K.-J

    J. Park and K.-J. Park, Seiberg-like Dualities for 3d N=2 Theories with SU(N) gauge group , JHEP 10 (2013) 198 [ 1305.6280]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Razamat, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, 3d dualities from 4d dualities , JHEP 07 (2013) 149 [ 1305.3924]

    2013 arXiv

  8. [16]

    S. Jain, S. Minwalla and S. Yokoyama, Chern Simons duality with a fundamental boson and fermion, JHEP 11 (2013) 037 [ 1305.7235]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Inbasekar, S

    K. Inbasekar, S. Jain, S. Mazumdar, S. Minwalla, V. Umesh and S. Yokoyama, Unitarity, crossing symmetry and duality in the scattering of N = 1 susy matter Chern-Simons theories, JHEP 10 (2015) 176 [ 1505.06571]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gur-Ari and R

    G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, Three Dimensional Bosonization From Supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2015) 013 [ 1507.04378]. – 80 –

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kapustin, B

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett and I. Yaakov, Tests of Seiberg-like dualities in three dimensions , JHEP 08 (2020) 114 [ 1012.4021]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Willett and I

    B. Willett and I. Yaakov, N = 2 dualities and Z-extremization in three dimensions , JHEP 10 (2020) 136 [ 1104.0487]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kapustin, Seiberg-like duality in three dimensions for orthogonal gauge groups , 1104.0466

    A. Kapustin, Seiberg-like duality in three dimensions for orthogonal gauge groups , 1104.0466

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Intriligator and N

    K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Aspects of 3d N=2 Chern-Simons-Matter Theories , JHEP 07 (2013) 079 [ 1305.1633]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Jensen and P

    K. Jensen and P. Patil, Chern-Simons dualities with multiple flavors at large N, JHEP 12 (2019) 043 [ 1910.07484]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Aharony and A

    O. Aharony and A. Sharon, Large N renormalization group flows in 3d N = 1 Chern-Simons-Matter theories, JHEP 07 (2019) 160 [ 1905.07146]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. Jain and S. Minwalla, Flows, Fixed Points and Duality in Chern-Simons-matter theories, JHEP 12 (2018) 058 [ 1808.03317]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Radiˇ cevi´ c,Disorder Operators in Chern-Simons-Fermion Theories , JHEP 03 (2016) 131 [1511.01902]

    D. Radiˇ cevi´ c,Disorder Operators in Chern-Simons-Fermion Theories , JHEP 03 (2016) 131 [1511.01902]

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Kapoor and S

    S. Kapoor and S. Prakash, Bifundamental multiscalar fixed points in d=3- ε, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 026002 [ 2112.01055]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gur-Ari and R

    G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, Correlators of Large N Fermionic Chern-Simons Vector Models , JHEP 02 (2013) 150 [ 1211.1866]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bedhotiya and S

    A. Bedhotiya and S. Prakash, A test of bosonization at the level of four-point functions in Chern-Simons vector models, JHEP 12 (2015) 032 [ 1506.05412]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    S. Jain, M. Mandlik, S. Minwalla, T. Takimi, S.R. Wadia and S. Yokoyama, Unitarity, Crossing Symmetry and Duality of the S-matrix in large N Chern-Simons theories with fundamental matter, JHEP 04 (2015) 129 [ 1404.6373]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Dandekar, M

    Y. Dandekar, M. Mandlik and S. Minwalla, Poles in the S-Matrix of Relativistic Chern-Simons Matter theories from Quantum Mechanics , JHEP 04 (2015) 102 [ 1407.1322]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Yokoyama, Scattering Amplitude and Bosonization Duality in General Chern-Simons Vector Models, JHEP 09 (2016) 105 [ 1604.01897]

    S. Yokoyama, Scattering Amplitude and Bosonization Duality in General Chern-Simons Vector Models, JHEP 09 (2016) 105 [ 1604.01897]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jain, S.P

    S. Jain, S.P. Trivedi, S.R. Wadia and S. Yokoyama, Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theories with Vector Matter, JHEP 10 (2012) 194 [ 1207.4750]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. Giombi, G. Gur-Ari, J. Maldacena and R. Yacoby, The Thermal Free Energy in Large N Chern-Simons-Matter Theories , JHEP 03 (2013) 121 [ 1211.4843]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    S. Jain, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma, T. Takimi, S.R. Wadia and S. Yokoyama, Phases of large N vector Chern-Simons theories on S2×S1, JHEP 09 (2013) 009 [ 1301.6169]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Takimi, Duality and higher temperature phases of large N Chern-Simons matter theories on S2 x S1, JHEP 07 (2013) 177 [ 1304.3725]

    T. Takimi, Duality and higher temperature phases of large N Chern-Simons matter theories on S2 x S1, JHEP 07 (2013) 177 [ 1304.3725]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Minwalla and S

    S. Minwalla and S. Yokoyama, Chern Simons Bosonization along RG Flows , JHEP 02 (2016) 103 [ 1507.04546]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. Dey, I. Halder, S. Jain, L. Janagal, S. Minwalla and N. Prabhakar, Duality and an exact Landau-Ginzburg potential for quasi-bosonic Chern-Simons-Matter theories , JHEP 11 (2018) 020 [1808.04415]. – 81 –

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Choudhury, A

    S. Choudhury, A. Dey, I. Halder, S. Jain, L. Janagal, S. Minwalla et al., Bose-Fermi Chern-Simons Dualities in the Higgsed Phase , JHEP 11 (2018) 177 [ 1804.08635]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Vasiliev, Y.M

    A.N. Vasiliev, Y.M. Pismak and Y.R. Khonkonen, 1 /N expansion: calculation of the exponent eta in the order 1/N3 by the conformal bootstrap method , Theor. Math. Phys. 50 (1982) 127

    1982

  33. [41]

    Yacoby, Scalar Correlators in Bosonic Chern-Simons Vector Models , 1805.11627

    R. Yacoby, Scalar Correlators in Bosonic Chern-Simons Vector Models , 1805.11627

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Turiaci and A

    G.J. Turiaci and A. Zhiboedov, Veneziano Amplitude of Vasiliev Theory , JHEP 10 (2018) 034 [1802.04390]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Aharony, L.F

    O. Aharony, L.F. Alday, A. Bissi and R. Yacoby, The Analytic Bootstrap for Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models, JHEP 08 (2018) 166 [ 1805.04377]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Giombi, V

    S. Giombi, V. Gurucharan, V. Kirilin, S. Prakash and E. Skvortsov, On the Higher-Spin Spectrum in Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models , JHEP 01 (2017) 058 [ 1610.08472]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    S. Jain, V. Malvimat, A. Mehta, S. Prakash and N. Sudhir, All order exact result for the anomalous dimension of the scalar primary in Chern-Simons vector models , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 126017 [ 1906.06342]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    P. Jain, S. Jain, B. Sahoo, K.S. Dhruva and A. Zade, Mapping Large N Slightly Broken Higher Spin (SBHS) theory correlators to free theory correlators , JHEP 12 (2023) 173 [2207.05101]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Pisarski, Fixed point structure of ϕ6 in three-dimensions at large N , Phys

    R.D. Pisarski, Fixed point structure of ϕ6 in three-dimensions at large N , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 574

    1982

  40. [48]

    Avdeev, D.I

    L.V. Avdeev, D.I. Kazakov and I.N. Kondrashuk, Renormalizations in supersymmetric and nonsupersymmetric nonAbelian Chern-Simons field theories with matter , Nucl. Phys. B 391 (1993) 333

    1993

  41. [49]

    Aharony, G

    O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby, d=3 Bosonic Vector Models Coupled to Chern-Simons Gauge Theories , JHEP 03 (2012) 037 [ 1110.4382]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Anninos, R

    D. Anninos, R. Mahajan, D. Radiˇ cevi´ c and E. Shaghoulian,Chern-Simons-Ghost Theories and de Sitter Space , JHEP 01 (2015) 074 [ 1405.1424]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures , Online access with purchase: Cambridge Books Online, Cambridge University Press (1988)

    S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures , Online access with purchase: Cambridge Books Online, Cambridge University Press (1988)

    1988

  44. [52]

    Kalloor, Four-point functions in large N Chern-Simons fermionic theories , JHEP 10 (2020) 028 [ 1910.14617]

    R.R. Kalloor, Four-point functions in large N Chern-Simons fermionic theories , JHEP 10 (2020) 028 [ 1910.14617]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Banerjee and D

    S. Banerjee and D. Radiˇ cevi´ c,Chern-Simons theory coupled to bifundamental scalars , JHEP 06 (2014) 168 [ 1308.2077]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint, University Press of Virginia (1965)

    J. Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint, University Press of Virginia (1965)

    1965

  47. [55]

    Guillemin and A

    V. Guillemin and A. Pollack, Differential Topology, AMS Chelsea Publishing, AMS Chelsea Pub. (2010). – 82 –

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.