Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Tailoring spatial correlations with quantum interference

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two-photon correlation maps can be written point-by-point with structured polarization at a beam splitter.

desk verdict A clean, parameter-free demonstration of pointwise HOM visibility shaping, but an internal formula discrepancy and thin experimental reporting keep it from being fully convincing as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04725 v1 pith:3BUCV3JY submitted 2025-09-05 quant-ph physics.optics

Carlo Schiano , Bereneice Sephton , Elnaz Darsheshdar , Lorenzo Marrucci , Corrado de Lisio , Vincenzo D'Ambrosio This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords quantuminterferenceHong-Ou-Mandeleffectvectorvortexbeamsspatialcorrelationspolarizationstructuringcoincidenceimaginghigh-dimensionalinformationeraser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a way to tailor the spatial correlations of two photons after they interfere at a 50:50 beam splitter, by structuring each photon's polarization point-by-point across the transverse plane. The central claim is that local control of indistinguishability writes a spatially resolved quantum-interference pattern into the coincidence counts of the two output ports, even though ordinary intensity images show nothing. The authors derive analytical visibility functions for specific structured input modes, such as V(φC, φD) = cos(2φC)cos(2φD), and confirm them with an event-camera experiment using vector vortex modes. They also show that placing polarizers in the output ports edits these correlation patterns, adding a further layer of control. If correct, the scheme provides a simple route to encoding high-dimensional information in photon correlations for quantum communication and imaging.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vector vortex mode, a transverse beam whose local polarization direction varies with azimuthal angle. These modes are prepared with q-plates and define a position-dependent polarization unit vector eσ(r) for each input photon. The beam-splitter transformation combines the two modes, and the coincidence probability between output positions is governed by the local overlap of the two polarization vectors: where they are locally indistinguishable, quantum interference suppresses or enhances coincidence counts; where they are locally distinguishable, it does not. The visibility function V(rC; rD) = (C_out − C_in)/C_out quantifies this pattern in a way that isolates the

What would settle it

Send two photons into the beam splitter with radial and π vector vortex modes, but deliberately give arm B a different radial profile (for example, a different Laguerre-Gaussian p index or a small defocus) while keeping the azimuthal polarization structure unchanged. If the factorized prediction V(φC, φD) = cos(2φC)cos(2φD) still fits the measured coincidence map, the shared-profile assumption is not needed at the claimed precision; if the visibility pattern washes out or develops a radial dependence, the assumption is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Two photons prepared in spatially varying polarization modes, sent into opposite ports of a 50:50 beam splitter, produce coincidence maps between the two outputs that change from point to point. For input modes that are the radial and π vector-vortex modes, the spatially resolved visibility takes the checkered form V(φC, φD) = cos(2φC)cos(2φD), alternating between bunching and anti-bunching with azimuthal period π. Because the two input modes are orthogonal, this structure is invisible to bucket detection: integrating over either output angle gives zero visibility. Replacing one input with a circularly polarized OAM mode changes the pattern to V(φC, φD) = ½cos(2(φC − φD)), and inserting pola

Load-bearing premise

The two input photons must share exactly the same transverse spatial profile, so that the coincidence probability factorizes into a product of a fluence envelope and a polarization-interference term; if the arms have different radial profiles, wavefront curvatures, or Gouy-phase-dependent structures, the predicted visibility maps break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The written correlation patterns are invisible to ordinary intensity measurements, so high-dimensional information can be encoded in photon correlations and hidden from a classical observer.
  • For orthogonal input vector modes, spatial resolution in both output arms is required to see the correlations; bucket detection in either arm erases the structure entirely.
  • Polarization projections after the beam splitter edit the correlation maps, yielding uniform bunching, uniform anti-bunching, or single-coordinate patterns, which can serve as an additional decoding key.
  • The approach generalizes to more than two photons through Hong-Ou-Mandel interference, offering a route to multipartite structured correlations that avoids the scaling limits of spontaneous parametric down-conversion.
  • Local visibility maps reveal substantial spatial variation in two-photon interference, going beyond the global averages measured in standard Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the static q-plates were replaced by programmable spatial light modulators, the same mechanism could produce reconfigurable correlation patterns, turning the beam splitter into a programmable coincidence-pattern generator.
  • The factorization assumption underlying the analytical visibility formulas hinges on identical transverse profiles in both arms; experiments that deliberately introduce different radial profiles, wavefront curvatures, or Gouy-phase shifts could transform the visibility landscape in a predictable but uncharacterized way.
  • The pointwise distinguishability mechanism could be combined with orbital-angular-momentum sorting to build a high-dimensional encoding scheme where information is read only through coincidence measurements at matched spatial positions.
  • Because the same local-interference principle underlies both the 'hiding' and the 'editing' behavior, the scheme suggests a cryptographic primitive: a correlation key that is invisible under intensity detection and changes value when a projective polarization filter is inserted.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes and experimentally implements a method for tailoring the spatial correlations between two photons after a 50:50 beam splitter by structuring the transverse polarization profile (vector vortex modes) of the input photons. For temporally indistinguishable photons, the coincidence probability at output ports C and D is shown to depend pointwise on the local overlap of the structured modes; the paper derives parameter-free analytical visibility functions V=(C_out−C_in)/C_out for specific mode combinations, e.g., V=cos2φC cos2φD for radial and π VV modes. The experiment uses a TimePix3 event camera to record spatially resolved coincidences and demonstrates editing of the correlation maps by inserting polarizers. The authors claim this constitutes a scheme to write arbitrary spatially dependent correlations, with potential applications in high-dimensional quantum communication and imaging.

Significance. If fully validated, the scheme offers a simple, source-agnostic route to structuring biphoton correlations in the transverse plane, complementing SPDC-based approaches. The analytical treatment is self-contained, parameter-free, and yields falsifiable predictions. The experimental demonstration is visually compelling and the extension to multiphoton scenarios is plausible. However, the current manuscript does not provide quantitative agreement metrics, public data, or a direct check of the key mode-matching assumption, so the strength of the experimental support is substantially weaker than the text suggests. The idea is nevertheless novel and likely of interest to the quantum-optics community.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI, before Eq. (S11); main text Eq. (4) and Discussion] The visibility formulas (SI Eqs. S18, S20, S29–S31) are derived after factorizing A(rC,rD)=F(rC,zC)F(rD,zD), which requires the two input photons to share the same transverse profile f(r,z,t) and the vector mode eσ(r) to be independent of z. The experiment does not report any measurement of the single-arm spatial profiles or of the two-arm mode overlap at the BS and camera. Because radial and π-VV modes are superpositions of OAM ±1 components with polarization-dependent Gouy phases, differential Gouy phases or waist mismatches between the arms would break the factorization and alter the predicted maps, including the exact checkerboard and the zero visibility after single-coordinate integration. The Discussion only states qualitatively that Gouy-phase sensitivity 'should be kept in mind.' Please provide a direct mode-matching check (e.g., measured beam radii and wavefront curvatures at th
  2. [Figs. 2 and 3] No uncertainties, confidence intervals, or quantitative agreement metrics are reported for any experimental visibility map. The text repeatedly asserts 'good agreement' and acknowledges 'slight asymmetries' without numbers. Since the central claim is an experimental demonstration, the manuscript should include at least per-pixel error bars derived from Poissonian count statistics and a global fidelity or reduced chi-square between the measured and predicted V maps. The data-availability statement ('may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request') falls short of the transparency expected for a claim of this strength.
  3. [Main text, Results (third paragraph) vs SI Eq. (S20)] The main text states V(φC;φD) = 1/2 cos(φC − φD) for the radial-VV plus circular-OAM l=1 input, but the SI derivation gives V = 1/2 cos 2(φC − φD). The latter follows from Eq. (S11) for l=1; the main-text formula is inconsistent and changes the predicted periodicity. This is not merely a typo, because the subsequent sentence in the same paragraph uses the periodicity to discuss control by the OAM difference. Please correct the main-text formula and verify that the plotted theoretical map matches the SI expression.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction / Conclusion] The phrase 'write arbitrary spatially-dependent correlations' overstates what is demonstrated: only two specific azimuthal mode families and a few projection settings are shown. Suggest softening to 'a class of' or 'tailored' spatial correlations.
  2. [Figure captions] Please define the color scale, the meaning of φC and φD, and the radial integration procedure in the captions of Figs. 1–3, so that the maps are self-explanatory.
  3. [SI, Eq. (S27)] The expression for C_H,V(Out) appears to have a typographical artifact with a stray ' / 2' after 'sin^2 φD'. Please verify the factor.
  4. [Data availability] Consider depositing processed visibility maps and coincidence-count data in a public repository instead of 'available upon request,' which would strengthen reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the visibility predictions are parameter-free consequences of the stated input modes and standard Glauber theory.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The visibility functions V(φC,φD)=cos2φC cos2φD, V=1/2 cos(φC−φD), and the polarization-projection expressions (Eqs. 11, 12 and SI Eqs. S18, S20, S29–S31) follow by substituting the explicitly defined input modes e_rad, e_π, and e_⟳ into the standard fourth-order Glauber correlation function. No fitted parameter is introduced and no subset of the data is used to construct the analytical curves; the theoretical expressions are parameter-free predictions from the chosen mode structures. The factorization C(In/Out)=A(rC,rD)×(polarization overlap terms) in SI Eqs. (S11)–(S12) rests on the explicitly stated assumption that the two input photons share the same transverse spatial profile f(r,z,t). That is a stated premise of the model, not an input secretly containing the predicted visibility. The self-citations [19] and [29] are contextual references to prior quantum-eraser and vector-vortex work; they do not carry the derivation. The Discussion's caution about propagation-related Gouy phases is an acknowledged experimental limitation, not a circular step in the theoretical chain. No equation is shown to reduce to another equation by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Hence the paper's claimed ability to shape spatial correlations by patterning input polarization distinguishability is an independent derivation, not a circular one.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central visibility formulas are derived without fitted parameters. The assumptions are standard paraxial QED two-photon correlation theory, an ideal 50:50 BS, identical transverse profiles, and an orthogonal mode basis. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Fourth-order Glauber correlation function describes two-photon coincidence detection (Eq. S3)
    Invoked in SI Eq. (S3) and refs. [35,41]; not proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption Input modes share identical transverse spatial profile f(r,z,t), enabling factorization A(rC,rD)=F(rC)F(rD)
    SI text before Eq. (S11): "under the assumption that the two input modes share the same transverse spatial profile." This is load-bearing for all visibility formulas.
  • domain assumption Ideal lossless 50:50 beam splitter with mode transformation a=(c+d)/√2, b=(c−d)/√2, and post-selection of separate outputs
    SI Eq. (S7); standard HOM model, not experimentally characterized (no measured reflectivity or calibration data in the paper).
  • domain assumption Paraxial, quasi-monochromatic modes with transverse polarization vector eσ(r,φ) constant along propagation
    SI Eqs. (S4)-(S5) and main text Eq. (3). Gouy-phase and propagation effects are deferred to the discussion.
  • domain assumption Mode basis orthogonality for different indices (spatial, polarization, time-bin)
    SI Eq. (S4): "The orthogonality of modes with different indices is assumed."

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tailoring spatial correlations with quantum interference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3BUCV3JY

@misc{pith2026250904725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tailoring spatial correlations with quantum interference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3BUCV3JY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04725}
}
read the original abstract

Photon correlations represent a central resource in many quantum optics experiments, with applications ranging from quantum information protocols to sensing. Engineering such correlations is often challenging, especially in multi-particle scenarios. In this work we describe an effective method for shaping spatial correlations between photons by patterning their distinguishability in a quantum interference setup. We show how to write and edit these bi-photon correlations between the two output channels of a beam-splitter, hiding this encoded information from conventional intensity measurements. Our scheme offers an easy extension to multiparticle scenarios and facilitates the transmission of high-dimensional quantum information, with potential applications to quantum communication and imaging protocols.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.04725 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tailoring structured correlations. (a) Experimental setup used to write correlations by mixing two spatially structured photons with a 50:50 beam splitter. Top inset depicts an example of the selected regions of photon detection events for coincidence measurement in the angular coordinate (φC , φD) of the transverse plane, for each output port. (b) Angular dependence of the experimental correlations between ports C … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Visibility distributions. Experimental (Exp.) and theoretical (Th.) visibility distributions showing the correlations written by structuring photon A with a radial VV mode (top row inset) and photon B (left column insets) with a π−VV mode (first row) and circularly polarised, ℓ = 1 scalar mode (second row). onto separate regions of a single-photon event camera, serving as independent regions for the measurement of s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Editing correlations with polarisation erasure. Experimental (Exp.) and theoretical (Th.) visibility distributions showing edited correlations by performing polarisation projections when input photon A is in a radial VV mode and photon B in a (a) π−VV mode and a (b) circularly polarised ℓ = 1 scalar mode. Polariser orientations are indicated by the arrows in the top and left sections of the tables. higher-dimensiona… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Topological Quantum Interferometry

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Topological quantum interferometry driven by exchange Berry phase generalizes q-plate methods to arbitrary charges, using BPX as a control parameter to decompose two-photon patterns and witness dimensionality via topo...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Yallapragada, V

    Lubin, G., Oron, D., Rossman, U., Tenne, R. & Yallapragada, V. J. Photon correlations in spectroscopy and microscopy.ACS photonics9, 2891–2904 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Defienne, H.et al.Advances in quantum imaging.Nature Photonics18, 1024–1036 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Challenging local realism with human choices.Nature557(2018)

    BIG Bell Test Collaboration. Challenging local realism with human choices.Nature557(2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Gilaberte Basset, M.et al.Experimental analysis of image resolution of quantum imaging with undetected light through position correlations.Physical Review A 108, 052610 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Real applications of quantum imaging

    Genovese, M. Real applications of quantum imaging. Journal of Optics18, 073002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    G., Balaji, B

    England, D. G., Balaji, B. & Sussman, B. J. 6 Quantum-enhanced standoff detection using correlated photon pairs.Physical Review A99, 023828 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    & Dowling, J

    Jackson, D., Hockney, G. & Dowling, J. Optical communication noise rejection using correlated photons. journal of modern optics49, 2383–2388 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    M., Fedrizzi, A., Stace, T

    Bra´ nczyk, A. M., Fedrizzi, A., Stace, T. M., Ralph, T. C. & White, A. G. Engineered optical nonlinearity for quantum light sources.Opt. Express19, 55–65 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    & Bra´ nczyk, A

    Dosseva, A., Cincio, L. & Bra´ nczyk, A. M. Shaping the joint spectrum of down-converted photons through optimized custom poling.Phys. Rev. A93, 013801 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    & Arie, A

    Yesharim, O., Pearl, S., Foley-Comer, J., Juwiler, I. & Arie, A. Direct generation of spatially entangled qudits using quantum nonlinear optical holography.Science Advances9, eade7968 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    & Torres, J

    Valencia, A., Cer´ e, A., Shi, X., Molina-Terriza, G. & Torres, J. P. Shaping the waveform of entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 243601 (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    & Weihs, G

    Mair, A., Vaziri, A. & Weihs, G. e. a. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons.Nature 412, 313–316 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    V., Bobrov, I

    Kovlakov, E. V., Bobrov, I. B., Straupe, S. S. & Kulik, S. P. Spatial bell-state generation without transverse mode subspace postselection.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030503 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    V., Straupe, S

    Kovlakov, E. V., Straupe, S. S. & Kulik, S. P. Quantum state engineering with twisted photons via adaptive shaping of the pump beam.Phys. Rev. A98, 060301 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    & Gigan, S

    Boucher, P., Defienne, H. & Gigan, S. Engineering spatial correlations of entangled photon pairs by pump beam shaping.Opt. Lett.46, 4200–4203 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    & Stefanov, A

    Untern¨ ahrer, M., Bessire, B., Gasparini, L., Perenzoni, M. & Stefanov, A. Super-resolution quantum imaging at the heisenberg limit.Optica5, 1150–1154 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Francesconi, S.et al.Anyonic two-photon statistics with a semiconductor chip.ACS Photonics8, 2764–2769 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    & Defienne, H

    Verni` ere, C. & Defienne, H. Hiding images in quantum correlations.Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093601 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Physical ReviewA94, 030304 (2016)

    D’Ambrosio, V.et al.Entangled vector vortex beams. Physical ReviewA94, 030304 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Gao, X.et al.Full spatial characterization of entangled structured photons.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063802 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    & Defienne, H

    Cameron, P., Courmea, B., Faccio, D. & Defienne, H. Shaping the spatial correlations of entangled photon pairs. J. Phys. Photonics6, 033001 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Chang, C. W. S.et al.Observation of three-photon spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a superconducting parametric cavity.Phys. Rev. X 10, 011011 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Bouchard, F.et al.Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect.Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 012402 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    quantum eraser

    Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M. & Chiao, R. Y. Observation of a “quantum eraser”: A revival of coherence in a two-photon interference experiment.Physical Review A 45, 7729 (1992)

    1992

  17. [25]

    & Monken, C

    Walborn, S., De Oliveira, A., P´ adua, S. & Monken, C. Multimode Hong-Ou-Mandel interference.Physical review letters90, 143601 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Nagali, E.et al.Optimal quantum cloning of orbital angular momentum photon qubits through Hong–Ou–Mandel coalescence.Nature Photonics3, 720–723 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    & Van Exter, M

    Di Lorenzo Pires, H., Florijn, H. & Van Exter, M. Measurement of the spiral spectrum of entangled two-photon states.Physical review letters104, 020505 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Karimi, E.et al.Exploring the quantum nature of the radial degree of freedom of a photon via Hong-Ou-Mandel interference.Physical Review A89, 013829 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Schiano, C.et al.Engineering quantum states from a spatially structured quantum eraser.Science Advances 10, eadm9278 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    & Karimi, E

    Gao, X., Paneru, D., Di Colandrea, F., Zhang, Y. & Karimi, E. Generation of the complete bell basis via Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of vector modes.Phys. Rev. A112, 012215 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Bornman, N.et al.Ghost imaging using entanglement-swapped photons.npj Quantum Information5, 63 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Simultaneous entanglement swapping of multiple orbital angular momentum states of light.Nature communications8, 632 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Zhang, Y.et al.Engineering two-photon high-dimensional states through quantum interference.Science advances2, e1501165 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    & Laussy, F

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, E. & Laussy, F. P. Spatial correlations of vortex quantum states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01627(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, G

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. G., J. Dupont-Roc.Photons and Atoms: Basic Processes and Applications(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992)

    1992

  28. [36]

    & Zeilinger, A

    Weihs, G., Reck, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Two-photon interference in optical fiber multiports. Physical Review A54, 893 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    T., Cross, R

    Gard, B. T., Cross, R. M., Anisimov, P. M., Lee, H. & Dowling, J. P. Quantum random walks with multiphoton interference and high-order correlation functions.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B30, 1538–1545 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    However, this method faces significant challenges, including the need for a large number of SPDC sources and relatively low coincidence rates

    is a widely used approach. However, this method faces significant challenges, including the need for a large number of SPDC sources and relatively low coincidence rates. Structuring multiphoton correlations through quantum interference, as demonstrated in our experiment, is a ...

  31. [39]

    Zhong, H.-S.et al.12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250505 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Wang, H.et al.Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 10 14-dimensional Hilbert space.Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250503 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    & Karimi, E

    Jaouni, T., Gu, X., Krenn, M., D’Errico, A. & Karimi, E. Tutorial: Hong-Ou-Mandel interference with structured photons.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14961(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, G

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. G., J. Dupont-Roc.Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics(John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    & Nomerotski, A

    Fisher-Levine, M. & Nomerotski, A. Timepixcam: a fast optical imager with time-stamping.Journal of Instrumentation11, C03016 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Ianzano, C.et al.Fast camera spatial characterization of photonic polarization etanglement.Scientific Reports10 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    A quantum neuromorphic recognition machine of quantum states

    Vidyapin, V., Zhang, Y., Englend, D. & Sussman, B. Characterisation of a single photon event camera for quantum imaging.Scientific Reports13(2023). 7 Acknowledgements:We would like to thank Prof. Fabrice P. Laussy for helpful and stimulating discussions. The authors acknowledg...

    2023

  38. [46]

    STRUCTURED CORRELA TIONS FORMULA TION In this section, we provide a detailed theoretical framework for the results presented in the main text. We consider two photons in structured modes as inputs to A and B ports of a 50:50 beam splitter (BS) and measure two-fold coincidences...

  39. [47]

    The crystal was temperature phase-matched at 38 ◦C to ensure optimal down-conversion efficiency

    EXPERIMENT AL DET AILS Two photons with wavelength λ = 810 nm were generated in the state |ψ⟩ = |H⟩ |V⟩through type-II degenerate collinear Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion (SPDC) by pumping a 30 mm-long periodically poled KTP (ppKTP) crystal with a continuous-wave laser...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.