SynDelay: A Synthetic Dataset for Delivery Delay Prediction

Alexandra Brintrup; Liming Xu; Yunbo Long

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 23 references

SynDelay: A Synthetic Dataset for Delivery Delay Prediction

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A synthetic dataset opens delivery-delay prediction to fair benchmarking

desk verdict Useful dataset artifact, but the central realism claim is asserted without any fidelity check, so it needs major revision before it should anchor a benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.05325 v1 pith:PMX4FRDQ submitted 2025-08-30 cs.AI

Liming Xu , Yunbo Long , Alexandra Brintrup This is my paper

classification cs.AI

keywords deliverydelaypredictionsynthetictabulardatabenchmarkdatasetsupplychainAIclassimbalancelatentdiffusionLLM-guidedgenerationreproducibility

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that supply chain AI lacks openly available, well-curated benchmarks, and that synthetic data can fill the gap without exposing sensitive delivery records. It presents SynDelay, a 155,488-row synthetic dataset for delivery delay prediction, generated from real-world delivery data with a pipeline that combines LLM-based reasoning with a latent diffusion model. The central claim is that SynDelay preserves realistic delivery patterns, including class imbalance and noise, while protecting privacy. To make the dataset usable as a benchmark, the paper supplies five baselines and a standard evaluation protocol. If the claim holds, researchers gain a common testbed for comparing delivery-delay models.

What carries the argument

The generating mechanism is a prompt-guided latent diffusion framework for tabular data: a large language model first infers inter-column logical relationships from the cleaned real-world data, the data and relationships are tokenised and encoded, a score-based diffusion model is trained in latent space, and sampled embeddings are decoded back into tabular rows. This pipeline is what is supposed to preserve both statistical properties and realistic column dependencies while allowing unlimited synthetic sampling; the paper relies on it to turn one private real-world dataset into a shareable public one.

What would settle it

Train a classifier on SynDelay and evaluate on the original private dataset (or a held-out real subset); if the synthetic-trained model performs far worse than a model trained on real data while SynDelay's in-distribution accuracy stays high, the preservation claim fails. Similarly, a large distributional distance between SynDelay and the original on key columns would refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that SynDelay is a challenging, practical, and reproducible benchmark for delivery delay prediction. The dataset contains 155,488 rows and 41 predictive variables plus a three-class outcome (early, on-time, delayed), and it is deliberately left imbalanced and noisy to mirror real operations. Baseline experiments show that ensemble classifiers clearly beat trivial rules on aggregate and per-class metrics, but leave substantial room for improvement, which the paper reads as evidence that the dataset is nontrivial rather than as a state-of-the-art result. The paper positions SynDelay as a starting point for community benchmarking, not as a finished solution.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim stands on the assumption that the generative model preserved the statistical and inter-column properties of the original private delivery data, so the 155,488 synthetic rows are representative of real delays; the paper asserts this but never validates it against held-out real data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Delivery-delay prediction gains a common open dataset with baseline results, so future methods can be compared directly instead of on private or ad hoc data.
Synthetic release removes the privacy barrier that keeps most delivery data proprietary, enabling wider participation in supply chain AI research.
The reported baselines give a reference floor: any new model should beat random guess and ZeroR and improve on the ensemble classifiers' macro F1 before claiming progress.
The dataset's imbalance and noise make it a stress test for methods aimed at minority-class recognition, not just overall accuracy.
The same generation pipeline could be applied to other supply chain tabular tasks, expanding the benchmark ecosystem beyond delivery delays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the synthetic data genuinely preserves inter-column relationships, rankings obtained on SynDelay may transfer to real delivery-delay data; this transferability is the paper's key unstated assumption and can be tested directly.
The dataset could serve as a pre-training or augmentation source for delivery-delay models, but only for features that appear in both real and synthetic distributions; that use goes beyond what the paper evaluates.
A natural extension would be a regression variant predicting delay duration, or multi-region splits to study distribution shift; neither is present in this release but both would strengthen the benchmark's value.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: SynDelay could be a useful community resource, and the paper does the unglamorous work of shipping a dataset with baselines and evaluation metrics. But the sentence “preserves realistic delivery patterns” is the load-bearing claim, and the paper never tests it. If you treat SynDelay as a generic synthetic benchmark, it is fine. If you take the abstract seriously, it is unverified. The reader’s main concern lands.

What is actually new: the dataset itself and its release through the Supply Chain Data Hub. Delivery-delay prediction has no common open benchmark, so that gap is real. The authors also do the right structural things: they frame the baselines as reference points rather than state-of-the-art, report mean ± std over ten runs, and explicitly acknowledge that the data contain noise and are bounded by the generative model’s capabilities. Credit where due.

Where it is soft, in proportion: the realism claim is unsupported, and not in a subtle way. Table 1 gives row, column, and class counts for original and synthetic data, but no distributional comparison—no correlation error, no KS/Wasserstein, no downstream transfer check. The generation is a direct application of the authors’ own LLM-TabLogic method, but all technical details live in Long et al. [2025]; this paper does not say what preprocessing thresholds were used, how the model was validated, or how “realism” was judged. The privacy claim is likewise asserted rather than demonstrated. There is also a small internal inconsistency: the text says the original data has 54 columns, while Table 1 says 53 variables, and the text says the synthetic data has 41 variables plus the outcome column while the table appears to count 41 total. That is an editing issue, not a fatal one.

Could I live with the fidelity gap? Partly. If SynDelay were presented as a synthetic benchmark with stated limitations, the absence of a fidelity check would be a weakness but not disqualifying. The problem is that the abstract and Discussion present realism as established fact, and that is the paper’s reason to exist. The conclusion that SynDelay is “challenging and realistic” follows from running models on SynDelay itself; that is circular for the realism claim.

Who this is for: anyone building supply chain ML benchmarks, and anyone writing dataset papers. It is a clean example of both how to scaffold a benchmark and where the evidence needs to be supplied.

Recommendation: send it to peer review, but the authors need to either add real fidelity evidence against the original data or an external real-world benchmark, or soften the realism language substantially. With the claim as written, I would not cite it as a realistic testbed.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. SynDelay is a synthetic tabular dataset for delivery delay prediction, generated from a private real-world delivery dataset via an LLM-guided latent diffusion model. The paper reports dataset statistics (Table 1), baseline results for random guessing, ZeroR, Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost (Table 2), and positions SynDelay as a privacy-preserving, realistic benchmark that fills a gap in open supply-chain data. The central claim is that SynDelay 'preserves realistic delivery patterns while ensuring privacy,' and the paper argues that the modest but above-trivial performance of ensemble classifiers shows the dataset is challenging and realistic. The paper also introduces the Supply Chain Data Hub as a platform for open dataset sharing and benchmarking.

Significance. If the realism and privacy claims were substantiated, SynDelay would be a useful community resource: it addresses a genuine shortage of open, standardised supply-chain datasets, provides a reproducible baseline protocol with ten repeated runs and per-class metrics, and avoids overclaiming state-of-the-art performance. The public hosting via the Supply Chain Data Hub and the explicit call for community contributions are constructive. However, the paper's central contribution is asserted rather than demonstrated. No fidelity analysis against the original data or external delivery benchmarks is provided, and the privacy guarantee is unquantified. The dataset's value as a benchmark depends entirely on whether its distribution reflects real-world delivery-delay patterns; that load-bearing premise is currently unsupported. The strengths of the manuscript (open data, reproducible baselines, clearly scoped claims about the benchmarks) are real, but they cannot compensate for the missing evidence on the dataset's realism.

major comments (4)

[Dataset Generation and Description / Table 1] The paper's central claim is that SynDelay 'preserves realistic delivery patterns while ensuring privacy' (Abstract). No fidelity analysis is presented. Table 1 gives only row, variable, and class counts; the text asserts that the pipeline preserves 'both statistical properties and inter-column logical relationships' but reports no comparison between synthetic and original records, no distributional distance (e.g., KS or Wasserstein), no correlation-matrix error, and no check on temporal or logical constraints (e.g., date consistency). All baselines in Table 2 are evaluated exclusively on SynDelay, so they cannot validate realism. Please add a concrete fidelity analysis using the Original dataset (aggregate statistics can be reported without releasing raw data) or, if that is impossible, compare against public delivery datasets on shared variables.
[Dataset Generation and Description / Table 1] The metadata are internally inconsistent and must be reconciled before release. The text states that the original dataset 'comprises 180,519 rows and 54 columns,' while Table 1 lists 53 variables; the Num/Cat counts (24+16) sum to 40, leaving 13 variables unaccounted for. For SynDelay, 41 variables are reported, but 22+12=34, leaving 7 unaccounted. The paper should specify how datetime and text variables are counted and correct these numbers. This matters because the paper advertises SynDelay as a 'carefully curated' resource, and inaccurate metadata undermines reproducibility.
[Data Generation / Abstract] The privacy claim is stated without evidence. 'Ensuring privacy' is a motivation for synthetic data, but generative models can memorise training instances; no differential-privacy guarantee, membership-inference test, or nearest-neighbour leakage analysis is reported. Since one of the paper's selling points is that SynDelay enables sharing without exposing the underlying operational data, this claim is load-bearing. Please either provide a privacy evaluation or explicitly weaken the claim to 'no raw data are released'.
[Baseline Results / Table 2 / Discussion] The conclusion that modest ensemble performance shows SynDelay is 'challenging and realistic' is not supported as stated. The baselines use default hyperparameters and no domain-specific feature engineering, so the performance gaps relative to ZeroR/random may reflect model mis-specification rather than intrinsic data complexity. More importantly, no experiment demonstrates transferability to real delivery-delay prediction (e.g., training on SynDelay and evaluating on a real dataset or held-out original data). Without transfer evidence or an external benchmark comparison, the 'realistic benchmark' claim remains an assertion. Please add a transfer experiment or explicitly reframe the claim as internal complexity only.

minor comments (4)

[Figure 1] Typo in the figure: 'Samping' should be 'Sampling'.
[Baselines and Evaluation Metrics] The metric name 'Weighted F1 (Micro F1)' is incorrect: weighted F1 and micro F1 are different, and in single-label multi-class classification micro F1 equals accuracy. Please disambiguate.
[Dataset Generation and Description] The notation '# Vars (Num/Cat)' should define how datetime and text variables are counted; as written, the Num/Cat counts do not sum to the reported totals (see major comment).
[Concluding Remarks] The paper repeatedly refers to the dataset URL and 'all code openly accessible,' but no version, DOI, or licence is given. For a dataset paper, please include a permanent identifier and licensing information.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

SynDelay's realism claim rests solely on a self-cited generative model with no fidelity validation.

self citation load bearing [Abstract; Dataset Generation and Description, Data Generation paragraph]
"SynDelay preserves realistic delivery patterns while ensuring privacy. ... To address these challenges, we develop a lightweight framework specifically designed for generating supply chain tabular data... enabling the generation of synthetic datasets that preserves both statistical properties and inter-column logical relationships. ... For more technical details, see Long et al. [2025]."

The paper's central claim—that SynDelay 'preserves realistic delivery patterns'—is supported only by invoking the authors' own prior work (Long et al., 2025) for the generative model. No fidelity comparison between the synthetic and original datasets is provided (e.g., no distribution distances, correlation errors, or downstream transfer tests). The only evidence that the model preserves statistical properties and inter-column relationships is the self-citation. Thus the realism assertion reduces to an unverified premise from the same authors, which is load-bearing because the dataset's value as a benchmark depends entirely on that realism. Without independent validation, the 'realistic benchmark' conclusion is forced by the self-citation rather than demonstrated.

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is a synthetic dataset for delivery delay prediction, and its key advertised property is that it 'preserves realistic delivery patterns.' However, the paper provides no quantitative evidence for this claim. The generation method is described in-house (LLM-based latent diffusion) and all technical details are deferred to Long et al. (2025), a paper with overlapping authorship. The baselines are evaluated only on the synthetic data, so they cannot validate transferability or fidelity. The Discussion asserts that the dataset 'captures meaningful statistical patterns and inter-column relationships,' but again no comparison to the original data is shown. This is a classic case of a load-bearing self-citation: the realism claim is justified only by reference to the authors' own prior work, which is itself unverified within this manuscript. There is no external benchmark, no held-out real data, and no statistical fidelity metric. Consequently, the central claim is not self-contained; it depends entirely on an unshown property of the cited method. This is not a case of a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor an algebraic reduction by definition, but it does fit the pattern of self-citation being used as the sole support for a central premise. The dataset and baselines themselves are concrete outputs, but their stated usefulness as a realistic testbed is unsubstantiated. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the central claim reduces to a self-citation chain, while the peripheral benchmarking content has independent existence.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The dataset's realism depends on the generation model from the authors' prior work and on an unverified original dataset. The sample size and preprocessing choices are ad hoc, and no formal privacy mechanism is described.

free parameters (3)

generated sample count = 155,488
Hand-chosen to balance dataset size, diversity, and computational efficiency; not derived from a target distribution.
preprocessing thresholds = unknown
Noise removal, deduplication, and column selection rules are not quantified; they shape the label balance and remove 26% of rows and several columns.
generative model hyperparameters = not reported here
Assumed from the cited method (Long et al. 2025); not given in this paper, so the generation process is not reproducible.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Original dataset is representative of retail delivery delays
The provenance and collection method of the Original dataset are not described (Dataset Generation and Description).
ad hoc to paper LLM-guided latent diffusion preserves inter-column logical relationships and distributional patterns
The realism claim rests entirely on the authors' own prior model (Long et al. 2025), not independently verified here.
domain assumption Synthetic data ensures privacy without formal guarantees
Privacy is asserted but no differential privacy or re-identification test is provided (Abstract).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SynDelay: A Synthetic Dataset for Delivery Delay Prediction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PMX4FRDQ

@misc{pith2026250905325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SynDelay: A Synthetic Dataset for Delivery Delay Prediction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PMX4FRDQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.05325}
}

read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming supply chain management, yet progress in predictive tasks -- such as delivery delay prediction -- remains constrained by the scarcity of high-quality, openly available datasets. Existing datasets are often proprietary, small, or inconsistently maintained, hindering reproducibility and benchmarking. We present SynDelay, a synthetic dataset designed for delivery delay prediction. Generated using an advanced generative model trained on real-world data, SynDelay preserves realistic delivery patterns while ensuring privacy. Although not entirely free of noise or inconsistencies, it provides a challenging and practical testbed for advancing predictive modelling. To support adoption, we provide baseline results and evaluation metrics as initial benchmarks, serving as reference points rather than state-of-the-art claims. SynDelay is publicly available through the Supply Chain Data Hub, an open initiative promoting dataset sharing and benchmarking in supply chain AI. We encourage the community to contribute datasets, models, and evaluation practices to advance research in this area. All code is openly accessible at https://supplychaindatahub.org.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.05325 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...
[2]

Generating Synthetic Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls

Samuel A Assefa, Danial Dervovic, Mahmoud Mahfouz, Robert E Tillman, Prashant Reddy, and Manuela Veloso. Generating Synthetic Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls . In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pages 1--8, 2020

work page 2020
[3]

Advanced Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Supply Chain Risks under COVID-19 Restrictions

Mahmoud M Bassiouni, Ripon K Chakrabortty, Omar K Hussain, and Humyun Fuad Rahman. Advanced Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Supply Chain Risks under COVID-19 Restrictions . Expert Systems with Applications, 211: 0 118604, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Random Forests

Leo Breiman. Random Forests . Machine Learning, 45 0 (1): 0 5--32, 2001

work page 2001
[5]

Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Supplier Disruptions: a Case Study in Complex Asset Manufacturing

Alexandra Brintrup, Johnson Pak, David Ratiney, Tim Pearce, Pascal Wichmann, Philip Woodall, and Duncan McFarlane. Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Supplier Disruptions: a Case Study in Complex Asset Manufacturing . International Journal of Production Research, 58 0 (11): 0 3330--3341, 2020

work page 2020
[6]

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Supply Chain Demand Forecasting

Real Carbonneau, Kevin Laframboise, and Rustam Vahidov. Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Supply Chain Demand Forecasting . European Journal of Operational Research, 184 0 (3): 0 1140--1154, 2008

work page 2008
[7]

Synthetic Data in Machine Learning for Medicine and Healthcare

Richard J Chen, Ming Y Lu, Tiffany Y Chen, Drew FK Williamson, and Faisal Mahmood. Synthetic Data in Machine Learning for Medicine and Healthcare . Nature Biomedical Engineering, 5 0 (6): 0 493--497, 2021

work page 2021
[8]

XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System . In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 785--794, 2016

work page 2016

Show all 23 references

[9]

ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database

Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database . In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 248--255. Ieee, 2009

2009
[10]

A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Supply Chain Delivery Delay Risk based on Macroeconomic Indicators: A Case Study in the Automotive Sector

Matteo Gabellini, Lorenzo Civolani, Francesca Calabrese, and Marco Bortolini. A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Supply Chain Delivery Delay Risk based on Macroeconomic Indicators: A Case Study in the Automotive Sector . Applied Sciences, 14 0 (11): 0 4688, 2024

2024
[11]

Harnessing the Power of Synthetic Data in Healthcare: Innovation, Application, and Privacy

Mauro Giuffr \`e and Dennis L Shung. Harnessing the Power of Synthetic Data in Healthcare: Innovation, Application, and Privacy . NPJ Digital Medicine, 6 0 (1): 0 186, 2023

2023
[12]

Synthetic Data---What, Why and How? arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03257, 2022

James Jordon, Lukasz Szpruch, Florimond Houssiau, Mirko Bottarelli, Giovanni Cherubin, Carsten Maple, Samuel N Cohen, and Adrian Weller. Synthetic Data---What, Why and How? arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03257, 2022

2022 arXiv
[13]

Generating Synthetic Data for Medical Imaging

Lennart R Koetzier, Jie Wu, Domenico Mastrodicasa, Aline Lutz, Matthew Chung, W Adam Koszek, Jayanth Pratap, Akshay S Chaudhari, Pranav Rajpurkar, Matthew P Lungren, et al. Generating Synthetic Data for Medical Imaging . Radiology, 312 0 (3): 0 e232471, 2024

2024
[14]

Optimising Forecasting Models for Inventory Planning

Nikolaos Kourentzes, Juan R Trapero, and Devon K Barrow. Optimising Forecasting Models for Inventory Planning . International Journal of Production Economics, 225: 0 107597, 2020

2020
[15]

Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition

Yann LeCun, L \'e on Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition . Proceedings of the IEEE, 86 0 (11): 0 2278--2324, 1998

1998
[16]

Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context

Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll \'a r, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context . In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 740--755. Springer, 2014

2014
[17]

LLM-TabLogic: Preserving Inter-Column Logical Relationships in Synthetic Tabular Data via Prompt-Guided Latent Diffusion

Yunbo Long, Liming Xu, and Alexandra Brintrup. LLM-TabLogic: Preserving Inter-Column Logical Relationships in Synthetic Tabular Data via Prompt-Guided Latent Diffusion . arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.02161, 2025

2025 arXiv
[18]

2021 Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge: Data Set

Daniel Merch \'a n, Jatin Arora, Julian Pachon, Karthik Konduri, Matthias Winkenbach, Steven Parks, and Joseph Noszek. 2021 Amazon Last Mile Routing Research Challenge: Data Set . Transportation Science, 58 0 (1): 0 8--11, 2024

2021
[19]

CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features

Liudmila Prokhorenkova, Gleb Gusev, Aleksandr Vorobev, Anna Veronika Dorogush, and Andrey Gulin. CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features . Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018

2018
[20]

SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text

Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text . arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250, 2016

2016 arXiv
[21]

SupplyGraph: A Benchmark Dataset for Supply Chain Planning Using Graph Neural Networks

Azmine Toushik Wasi, MD Islam, and Adipto Raihan Akib. SupplyGraph: A Benchmark Dataset for Supply Chain Planning Using Graph Neural Networks . arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15299, 2024

2024 arXiv
[22]

LaDe: The First Comprehensive Last-mile Express Dataset from Industry

Lixia Wu, Haomin Wen, Haoyuan Hu, Xiaowei Mao, Yutong Xia, Ergang Shan, Jianbin Zheng, Junhong Lou, Yuxuan Liang, Liuqing Yang, et al. LaDe: The First Comprehensive Last-mile Express Dataset from Industry . In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discover...

2024
[23]

Federated Machine Learning for Privacy Preserving, Collective Supply Chain Risk Prediction

Ge Zheng, Lingxuan Kong, and Alexandra Brintrup. Federated Machine Learning for Privacy Preserving, Collective Supply Chain Risk Prediction . International Journal of Production Research, 61 0 (23): 0 8115--8132, 2023

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

[2] [2]

Generating Synthetic Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls

Samuel A Assefa, Danial Dervovic, Mahmoud Mahfouz, Robert E Tillman, Prashant Reddy, and Manuela Veloso. Generating Synthetic Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls . In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pages 1--8, 2020

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Advanced Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Supply Chain Risks under COVID-19 Restrictions

Mahmoud M Bassiouni, Ripon K Chakrabortty, Omar K Hussain, and Humyun Fuad Rahman. Advanced Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Supply Chain Risks under COVID-19 Restrictions . Expert Systems with Applications, 211: 0 118604, 2023

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Random Forests

Leo Breiman. Random Forests . Machine Learning, 45 0 (1): 0 5--32, 2001

work page 2001

[5] [5]

Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Supplier Disruptions: a Case Study in Complex Asset Manufacturing

Alexandra Brintrup, Johnson Pak, David Ratiney, Tim Pearce, Pascal Wichmann, Philip Woodall, and Duncan McFarlane. Supply Chain Data Analytics for Predicting Supplier Disruptions: a Case Study in Complex Asset Manufacturing . International Journal of Production Research, 58 0 (11): 0 3330--3341, 2020

work page 2020

[6] [6]

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Supply Chain Demand Forecasting

Real Carbonneau, Kevin Laframboise, and Rustam Vahidov. Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Supply Chain Demand Forecasting . European Journal of Operational Research, 184 0 (3): 0 1140--1154, 2008

work page 2008

[7] [7]

Synthetic Data in Machine Learning for Medicine and Healthcare

Richard J Chen, Ming Y Lu, Tiffany Y Chen, Drew FK Williamson, and Faisal Mahmood. Synthetic Data in Machine Learning for Medicine and Healthcare . Nature Biomedical Engineering, 5 0 (6): 0 493--497, 2021

work page 2021

[8] [8]

XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System . In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 785--794, 2016

work page 2016