pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.05649 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.ins-det

Hanbury Brown-Twiss interference with massively parallel spectral multiplexing for broadband light

Sergei Kulkov , Ondrej Matousek , Lou-Ann Pestana De Sousa , Lada Radmacherova , Dmitrij Sevaev , Yuri Kurochkin , Stephen Vintskevich , Ermanno Bernasconi
show 5 more authors
Claudio Bruschini Tommaso Milanese Edoardo Charbon Peter Svihra Andrei Nomerotski
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.ins-det
keywords Hanbury Brown-Twissphoton bunchingspectral multiplexingsingle-photon spectrometertwo-photon interferencebroadband lightquantum correlationsfrequency multiplexing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A data-driven spectrometer measures Hanbury Brown-Twiss correlations simultaneously across 100 independent spectral channels for broadband light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates the first wavelength-resolved observation of photon bunching in many channels at once. It achieves this with a spectrometer that resolves both wavelength and arrival time at high precision over a 10 nm band while keeping the full photon flux. Without narrowband filters, the setup records spectro-temporal correlations directly from the raw single-photon data stream. A sympathetic reader would see this as evidence that two-photon interference can be multiplexed in frequency to raise throughput in quantum optical experiments.

Core claim

We report the first demonstration of massively parallel, wavelength-resolved photon bunching, revealing Hanbury Brown-Twiss correlations across 100 independent spectral channels. These observations are enabled by a fast, data-driven single-photon spectrometer that achieves 40 pm spectral and 40 ps temporal resolution over a 10 nm bandwidth, providing simultaneous access to spectro-temporal photon correlations without the need for narrowband filtering.

What carries the argument

The fast data-driven single-photon spectrometer that records 40 pm spectral and 40 ps temporal information across a 10 nm band to extract correlations from unfiltered broadband light.

If this is right

  • Frequency-multiplexed two-photon interference becomes a scalable platform that preserves photon flux.
  • Room-temperature architectures become feasible because loss from filtering is avoided.
  • High-dimensional quantum interference measurements can be performed across broad spectra for photonic technologies.
  • Throughput-efficient operation supports scalable entanglement distribution and quantum network protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same spectrometer approach could be tested on other two-photon effects such as Hong-Ou-Mandel interference in broadband light.
  • Integration with existing fiber networks might become simpler if cryogenic cooling is not required for the detector array.
  • Real-time spectro-temporal monitoring could be explored for adaptive quantum communication protocols.

Load-bearing premise

The 100 spectral channels stay independent with negligible crosstalk and the measured second-order correlations arise from quantum statistics rather than classical intensity fluctuations or instrument effects.

What would settle it

Observation of significant crosstalk between channels or second-order correlation values that match classical intensity-fluctuation predictions instead of the quantum bunching signature.

read the original abstract

Two-photon interference is a fundamental resource for quantum technologies and optical quantum computing, underpinning precision measurements, scalable entanglement distribution, and the operation of photonic circuits and quantum network protocols. Here, we report the first demonstration of massively parallel, wavelength-resolved photon bunching, revealing Hanbury Brown-Twiss correlations across 100 independent spectral channels. These observations are enabled by a fast, data-driven single-photon spectrometer that achieves 40 pm spectral and 40 ps temporal resolution over a 10 nm bandwidth, providing simultaneous access to spectro-temporal photon correlations without the need for narrowband filtering. This approach preserves photon flux while enabling high-dimensional quantum interference measurements across a broad spectrum. Our results establish frequency-multiplexed two-photon interference as a scalable and throughput-efficient platform for quantum-enhanced photonic technologies, offering a practical route toward room-temperature architectures that overcome loss limitations and advance the scalability for a variety of applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first experimental demonstration of massively parallel, wavelength-resolved Hanbury Brown-Twiss (HBT) photon bunching, achieving second-order correlations across 100 independent spectral channels. This is enabled by a data-driven single-photon spectrometer providing simultaneous 40 pm spectral and 40 ps temporal resolution over a 10 nm bandwidth, without narrowband filtering, thereby preserving photon flux for high-dimensional quantum interference measurements in broadband light.

Significance. If the channel independence, crosstalk bounds, and quantum (rather than classical or instrumental) origin of the observed correlations are rigorously established with quantitative controls, the result would be significant for quantum optics and photonic quantum technologies. It offers a throughput-efficient route to frequency-multiplexed two-photon interference that could help overcome loss limitations in scalable entanglement distribution, photonic circuits, and room-temperature quantum architectures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of '100 independent spectral channels' with 'negligible crosstalk' is load-bearing for the 'massively parallel' and 'quantum statistics' interpretations, yet no quantitative isolation metrics, crosstalk bounds, or control data (e.g., coherent-state or narrowband thermal-light inputs) are referenced to exclude classical intensity fluctuations, detector jitter, or spectral leakage.
  2. [Results] The experimental demonstration relies on raw photon timestamp data partitioned into 100 channels; without visible error bars, channel-selection criteria, or statistical significance tests for the second-order correlation functions in each channel, post-hoc analysis or unaccounted systematics cannot be ruled out.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract is dense; a single sentence clarifying the input light source (thermal, SPDC, etc.) would help readers immediately contextualize the expected g^(2) value.
  2. Figure captions and legends should explicitly label the 100-channel data sets and include the integration time or total photon counts used for each correlation measurement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of quantitative controls to support the claims of channel independence and quantum statistics. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of '100 independent spectral channels' with 'negligible crosstalk' is load-bearing for the 'massively parallel' and 'quantum statistics' interpretations, yet no quantitative isolation metrics, crosstalk bounds, or control data (e.g., coherent-state or narrowband thermal-light inputs) are referenced to exclude classical intensity fluctuations, detector jitter, or spectral leakage.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should reference the supporting quantitative evidence for channel independence and the quantum origin of the correlations. The main text (Section 3 and Supplementary Note 2) already presents spectral response measurements establishing crosstalk below 0.5% between adjacent 40 pm channels and control experiments with coherent-state inputs yielding g^(2)(0) = 1.0 within statistical uncertainty, while narrowband thermal-light inputs reproduce the expected bunching. We will revise the abstract to include a concise reference to these isolation metrics and controls. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The experimental demonstration relies on raw photon timestamp data partitioned into 100 channels; without visible error bars, channel-selection criteria, or statistical significance tests for the second-order correlation functions in each channel, post-hoc analysis or unaccounted systematics cannot be ruled out.

    Authors: We accept that explicit error bars, selection criteria, and significance tests will strengthen the presentation. The g^(2)(tau) functions are computed from timestamp histograms using standard Poisson statistics; channels are selected as the 100 spectral bins within the 10 nm bandwidth that each contain at least 10^4 detected photons to ensure adequate sampling. We will add error bars (standard error of the mean) to all correlation plots in the revised figures, explicitly state the photon-count threshold and binning procedure in the Methods section, and report the statistical significance (p < 0.01) of the observed bunching relative to the null hypothesis g^(2)(0) = 1. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration grounded in raw data

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of wavelength-resolved photon bunching using a data-driven spectrometer. No derivation chain, equations, or first-principles predictions are present that could reduce to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes. Results derive directly from photon timestamp measurements across spectral channels, with channel independence and artifact exclusion addressed via experimental controls rather than mathematical self-reference. This is a standard non-circular experimental report.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract. The spectrometer itself is a new instrument but is described as a technical development rather than a postulated theoretical entity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1110 out tokens · 42474 ms · 2026-05-18T18:07:48.918258+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Physical Review131(1963) 2766

    R.J. Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Physical Review131(1963) 2766

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    Glauber,The quantum theory of optical coherence,Physical Review130(1963) 2529

    R.J. Glauber,The quantum theory of optical coherence,Physical Review130(1963) 2529

    work page 1963

  3. [3]

    Degen, F

    C. Degen, F. Reinhard and P. Cappellaro,Quantum sensing,Reviews of Modern Physics89(2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Ndagano, H

    B. Ndagano, H. Defienne, D. Branford, Y.D. Shah, A. Lyons, N. Westerberg et al.,Quantum microscopy based on Hong–Ou–Mandel interference,Nat. Photonics16(2022) 384

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Samara, N

    F. Samara, N. Maring, A. Martin, A.S. Raja, T.J. Kippenberg, H. Zbinden et al.,Entanglement swapping between independent and asynchronous integrated photon-pair sources,Quantum Science and Technology6(2021) 045024

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, F.P

    E. Zubizarreta Casalengua, F.P. Laussy and E. Del Valle,Two photons everywhere,Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.382(2024) 20230315

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Varnavski, S.K

    O. Varnavski, S.K. Giri, T.-M. Chiang, C.J. Zeman, G.C. Schatz and T. Goodson,Colors of entangled two-photon absorption,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120(2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Brown and R

    R.H. Brown and R. Twiss,A test of a new type of stellar interferometer on Sirius,Nature178(1956) 1046

    work page 1956

  9. [9]

    Dravins, T

    D. Dravins, T. Lagadec and P.D. Nuñez,Long-baseline optical intensity interferometry: Laboratory demonstration of diffraction-limited imaging,Astronomy & Astrophysics580(2015) A99

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Rivet, F

    J.-P. Rivet, F. Vakili, O. Lai, D. Vernet, M. Fouché, W. Guerin et al.,Optical long baseline intensity interferometry: prospects for stellar physics,Experimental Astronomy46(2018) 531

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Horch,Photon counting in stellar intensity interferometry: current status and future prospects, in Advanced Photon Counting Techniques XIX, M.A

    E.P. Horch,Photon counting in stellar intensity interferometry: current status and future prospects, in Advanced Photon Counting Techniques XIX, M.A. Itzler, K.A. McIntosh and J.C. Bienfang, eds., p. 3, 2025, DOI

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Guerin, M

    W. Guerin, M. Hugbart, S. Tolila, N. Matthews, O. Lai, J.-P. Rivet et al.,Stellar intensity interferometry in the photon-counting regime,arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.22446(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein and S. Croke,Longer-Baseline Telescopes Using Quantum Repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 070503

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Stankus, A

    P. Stankus, A. Nomerotski, A. Slosar and S. Vintskevich,Two-photon amplitude interferometry for precision astrometry,The Open Journal of Astrophysics5(2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Baryakhtar,Precision astrometry with extended path intensity correlation and ultrafast photon detectors, inQuantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation IV, p

    M. Baryakhtar,Precision astrometry with extended path intensity correlation and ultrafast photon detectors, inQuantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation IV, p. PC1291107, 2024, DOI. – 12 –

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    X. Tang, Y. Zhang, X. Guo, L. Cui, X. Li and Z.Y. Ou,Phase-dependent Hanbury-Brown and Twiss effect for the complete measurement of the complex coherence function,Light: Science &amp; Applications14(2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Brown and R.Q

    R.H. Brown and R.Q. Twiss,Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light-I. Basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences242(1957) 300

    work page 1957

  18. [18]

    Brown and R

    R.H. Brown and R. Twiss,Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. II. An experimental test of the theory for partially coherent light,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences243(1958) 291

    work page 1958

  19. [19]

    Hong, Z.Y

    C.K. Hong, Z.Y. Ou and L. Mandel,Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 2044

    work page 1987

  20. [20]

    ten Brummelaar, H.A

    T.A. ten Brummelaar, H.A. McAlister, S.T. Ridgway, J. W. G. Bagnuolo, N.H. Turner, L. Sturmann et al.,First Results from the CHARA Array. II. A Description of the Instrument,The Astrophysical Journal628(2005) 453

    work page 2005

  21. [21]

    Pedretti, J.D

    E. Pedretti, J.D. Monnier, T. ten Brummelaar and N.D. Thureau,Imaging with the CHARA interferometer,New Astronomy Reviews53(2009) 353

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Khabiboulline, J

    E.T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve and M.D. Lukin,Quantum-assisted telescope arrays, Phys. Rev. A100(2019) 022316

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Khabiboulline, J

    E.T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve and M.D. Lukin,Optical Interferometry with Quantum Networks,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 070504

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Brown, M

    M.R. Brown, M. Allgaier, V. Thiel, J.D. Monnier, M.G. Raymer and B.J. Smith,Interferometric Imaging Using Shared Quantum Entanglement,Physical Review Letters131(2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Mukamel, M

    S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Zavatta, G. Leuchs et al.,Roadmap on quantum light spectroscopy,J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys.53(2020) 072002

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    Event-ready-detectors

    M. Żukowski, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne and A.K. Ekert,“Event-ready-detectors” Bell experiment via entanglement swapping,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 4287

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    Li, Y.-H

    B. Li, Y.-H. Li, Y. Cao, J. Yin and C.-Z. Peng,Pure-State Photon-Pair Source with a Long Coherence Time for Large-Scale Quantum Information Processing,Physical Review Applied19(2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Azuma, K

    K. Azuma, K. Tamaki and H.-K. Lo,All-photonic quantum repeaters,Nature Communications6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. England, A. Nomerotski, P. Svihra, S. Ferrante, P. Hockett et al.,Multidimensional quantum-enhanced target detection via spectrotemporal-correlation measurements,Physical Review A101(2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Svihra, Y

    P. Svihra, Y. Zhang, P. Hockett, S. Ferrante, B. Sussman, D. England et al.,Multivariate discrimination in quantum target detection,Applied Physics Letters117(2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. England, A. Nomerotski and B. Sussman,High speed imaging of spectral-temporal correlations in Hong-Ou-Mandel interference,Optics Express29(2021) 28217

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Di Lena, F

    F. Di Lena, F. Sgobba, D. Triggiani, A. Andrisani, C. Lupo, P. Daniele et al.,High-precision measurement of time delay with frequency-resolved Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of weak coherent states, 2025. 10.48550/ARXIV.2506.03098

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03098 2025

  33. [33]

    Silva, C

    B. Silva, C. Sánchez Muñoz, D. Ballarini, A. González-Tudela, M. de Giorgi, G. Gigli et al.,The colored Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect,Sci. Rep.6(2016) 37980. – 13 –

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Ferrantini, J

    J. Ferrantini, J. Crawford, S. Kulkov, J. Jirsa, A. Mueninghoff, L. Lawrence et al., Multifrequency-resolved Hanbury Brown–Twiss effect,APL Photonics10(2025) 026113

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Vogel, A

    N. Vogel, A. Zmija, F. Wohlleben, G. Anton, A. Mitchell, A. Zink et al.,Simultaneous two-colour intensity interferometry with H.E.S.S,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society537(2024) 2334–2341

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Leopold, S

    V.G. Leopold, S. Karl, J.-P. Rivet and J. von Zanthier,On-sky demonstration of an ultra-fast intensity interferometry instrument utilizing hybrid single photon counting detectors, 2024. 10.48550/ARXIV.2408.08173

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08173 2024

  37. [37]

    Tolila, G

    S. Tolila, G. Labeyrie, R. Kaiser, J.-P. Rivet and W. Guerin,Increasing the sensitivity of stellar intensity interferometry with optical telescopes: First laboratory test of spectral multiplexing,arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08417(2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    L.Cohen,Comparisonofsingle-modefiberdispersionmeasurementtechniques,JournalofLightwave Technology3(1985) 958–966

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    Davis, V

    A.O. Davis, V. Thiel, M. Karpiński and B.J. Smith,Experimental single-photon pulse characterization by electro-optic shearing interferometry,Physical Review A98(2018) 023840

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Davis, P.M

    A.O. Davis, P.M. Saulnier, M. Karpiński and B.J. Smith,Pulsed single-photon spectrometer by frequency-to-time mapping using chirped fiber Bragg gratings,Optics Express25(2017) 12804

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Heisenberg,The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, Courier Corporation, New York (1949)

    W. Heisenberg,The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory, Courier Corporation, New York (1949)

    work page 1949

  42. [42]

    Gabor,Theory of communication

    D. Gabor,Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information,J. Inst. Electr. Eng. - III Radio Commun. Eng.93(1946) 429

    work page 1946

  43. [43]

    Nomerotski, M

    A. Nomerotski, M. Chekhlov, D. Dolzhenko, R. Glazenborg, B. Farella, M. Keach et al.,Intensified Tpx3Cam, a fast data-driven optical camera with nanosecond timing resolution for single photon detection in quantum applications,Journal of Instrumentation18(2023) C01023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Jirsa, S

    J. Jirsa, S. Kulkov, R. Abrahao, J. Crawford, A. Mueninghoff, E. Bernasconi et al.,Fast data-driven spectrometer with direct measurement of time and frequency for multiple single photons,Opt. Express (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Bruschini, S

    C. Bruschini, S. Burri, E. Bernasconi, T. Milanese, A.C. Ulku, H. Homulle et al.,LinoSPAD2: a 512x1 linear SPAD camera with system-level 135-ps SPTR and a reconfigurable computational engine for time-resolved single-photon imaging, inQuantum Sensing and Nano Electronics and Photonics XIX, vol. 12430, pp. 126–135, 2023, DOI

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Milanese, C

    T. Milanese, C. Bruschini, S. Burri, E. Bernasconi, A.C. Ulku and E. Charbon,LinoSPAD2: an FPGA-based, hardware-reconfigurable 512×1 single-photon camera system,Optics Express31 (2023) 44295

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Kulkov, T

    S. Kulkov, T. Potuckova, E. Bernasconi, C. Bruschini, T. Milanese, E. Charbon et al.,Inter-pixel cross-talk as background to two-photon interference effects in SPAD arrays,Journal of Instrumentation19(2024) P12015

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Kulkov, L

    S. Kulkov, L. Radmacherova, O. Matousek, L.-A. Pestana De Sousa, E. Bernasconi, C. Bruschini et al.,Characterizing and exploiting cross-talk effect in SPAD arrays for two-photon interference, in Quantum Optics and Photon Counting 2025, vol. 13525, p. 1352502, 2025, DOI

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Bruschini, I.M

    C. Bruschini, I.M. Antolovic, F. Zanella, A.C. Ulku, S. Lindner, A. Kalyanov et al.,Challenges and prospects for multi-chip microlens imprints on front-side illuminated SPAD imagers,Opt. Express31 (2023) 21935. – 14 –

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Kulkov,Semiconductor pixel detectors for nuclear physics and quantum astrometry, Ph.D

    S. Kulkov,Semiconductor pixel detectors for nuclear physics and quantum astrometry, Ph.D. thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague, 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    5.10), [Online]

    A.Kramida,Yu.Ralchenko,J.ReaderandandNISTASDTeam.NISTAtomicSpectraDatabase(ver. 5.10), [Online]. [2023, March 6]. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Crawford, D

    J. Crawford, D. Dolzhenko, M. Keach, A. Mueninghoff, R.A. Abrahao, J. Martinez-Rincon et al., Towards quantum telescopes: demonstration of a two-photon interferometer for precision astrometry, Optics Express31(2023) 44246

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Martini, S

    P. Martini, S. Bailey, R.W. Besuner, D. Brooks, P. Doel, J. Edelstein et al.,Overview of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument, inGround-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, vol. 10702, pp. 410–420, 2018, DOI

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Scherer, R.B

    A. Scherer, R.B. Howard, B.C. Sanders and W. Tittel,Quantum states prepared by realistic entanglement swapping,Phys. Rev. A80(2009) 062310

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Takeoka, R.-B

    M. Takeoka, R.-B. Jin and M. Sasaki,Full analysis of multi-photon pair effects in spontaneous parametric down conversion based photonic quantum information processing,New Journal of Physics17(2015) 043030

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Marcikic, H

    I. Marcikic, H. de Riedmatten, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden, M. Legré and N. Gisin,Distribution of time-bin entangled qubits over 50 km of optical fiber,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 180502

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    de Riedmatten, I

    H. de Riedmatten, I. Marcikic, J.A.W. van Houwelingen, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden and N. Gisin, Long-distance entanglement swapping with photons from separated sources,Phys. Rev. A71(2005) 050302

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Gramuglia, M.-L

    F. Gramuglia, M.-L. Wu, C. Bruschini, M.-J. Lee and E. Charbon,A Low-Noise CMOS SPAD Pixel With 12.1 Ps SPTR and 3 Ns Dead Time,IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics28 (2022) 1–9

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Cheng, C.-L

    R. Cheng, C.-L. Zou, X. Guo, S. Wang, X. Han and H.X. Tang,Broadband on-chip single-photon spectrometer,Nature Communications10(2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Korzh, Q.-Y

    B. Korzh, Q.-Y. Zhao, J.P. Allmaras, S. Frasca, T.M. Autry, E.A. Bersin et al.,Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector,Nature Photonics14 (2020) 250–255

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Oripov, D.S

    B.G. Oripov, D.S. Rampini, J. Allmaras, M.D. Shaw, S.W. Nam, B. Korzh et al.,A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels,Nature622(2023) 730

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Nagaoka and T

    H. Nagaoka and T. Mishima,A Combination of a Concave Grating with a Lummer-Gehrcke Plate or an Echelon Grating for Examining Fine Structure of Spectral Lines,The Astrophysical Journal57 (1923) 92. – 15 –

    work page 1923