pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.06340 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

A flat-band perspective on the boson peak in amorphous solids

Shivam Mahajan , Long-Zhou Huang , Cunyuan Jiang , Yun-Jiang Wang , Massimo Pica Ciamarra , Jie Zhang , Matteo Baggioli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords boson peakamorphous solidsdynamical structure factorvibrational density of statesflat bandglassesphonon modesheat capacity anomaly
0
0 comments X

The pith

The boson peak arises as a flat or weakly dispersive band of vibrational spectral weight in the dynamical structure factor of amorphous solids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the boson peak is marked by vibrational spectral weight gathering inside a narrow frequency window whose position depends only weakly on wavevector. This picture treats the boson peak as a flat or weakly dispersive band rather than a propagating sound-like excitation. The authors reach this view by reexamining published experimental and simulation results and by running additional molecular-dynamics simulations in both two and three dimensions. A sympathetic reader cares because the claim sharply limits the class of theories that can account for the excess low-frequency density of states and heat capacity in glasses.

Core claim

The boson peak may have a defining dynamical feature: the accumulation of vibrational spectral weight within a narrow frequency window that is only weakly dependent on wavevector. In this perspective, the boson peak reflects a flat or weakly dispersive band in the dynamical structure factor rather than a propagating excitation. Reanalysis of existing data together with new simulations in two- and three-dimensional amorphous systems supplies converging evidence that supports this interpretation and constrains viable theoretical models.

What carries the argument

A flat or weakly dispersive band in the dynamical structure factor that concentrates vibrational spectral weight at nearly constant frequency across wavevectors and thereby produces the observed excess density of states.

If this is right

  • Any successful theory must generate modes whose characteristic frequency remains nearly independent of wavevector inside the boson-peak window.
  • The dynamical structure factor must exhibit a band that stays flat or only weakly sloped rather than showing clear linear dispersion at the relevant frequencies.
  • The excess heat capacity must track the presence of this weakly dispersive spectral feature across different materials and temperatures.
  • Models relying on strongly propagating excitations or purely localized modes without a flat-band component are ruled out by the observed wavevector dependence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The flat-band description may link the boson peak to flat-band physics already studied in other condensed-matter systems, offering a route to borrow calculational tools.
  • Larger-scale simulations that resolve the full wavevector dependence of the dynamical structure factor could provide a direct quantitative test.
  • If the interpretation holds, low-temperature thermal conductivity calculations in glasses would need to incorporate scattering from this non-dispersive band rather than from propagating phonons alone.
  • The same weak-dispersion signature might appear in other disordered systems such as jammed packings or colloidal glasses, allowing the perspective to be checked outside molecular solids.

Load-bearing premise

The boson peak is defined by vibrational spectral weight that piles up inside a frequency window whose location changes only weakly with wavevector.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the dynamical structure factor in which the frequency location of the boson peak peak shifts strongly with wavevector would falsify the flat-band claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06340 by Cunyuan Jiang, Jie Zhang, Long-Zhou Huang, Massimo Pica Ciamarra, Matteo Baggioli, Shivam Mahajan, Yun-Jiang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Dispersion relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Transverse dynamic structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Transverse dynamic structure factor for silica glass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The transverse dynamic structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Longitudinal dynamical structure factor of silica glass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The boson peak is a characteristic anomaly of amorphous solids broadly defined as a low-energy excess in the density of states and heat capacity compared to the textbook predictions of Debye theory. The origin of this anomaly has long been the subject of ongoing debate and remains a topic of active controversy. We propose that the boson peak may have a defining dynamical feature: the accumulation of vibrational spectral weight within a narrow frequency window that is only weakly dependent on wavevector. In this perspective, the boson peak reflects a flat or weakly dispersive band in the dynamical structure factor rather than a propagating excitation. We revisit both experimental and simulation data from the literature through this lens and conduct further simulations in 2D and 3D amorphous systems. Taken together, these analyses provide compelling converging evidence for this interpretation and sharply constrain the space of viable theoretical descriptions of the boson peak.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the boson peak in amorphous solids corresponds to a flat or weakly dispersive band in the dynamical structure factor, characterized by accumulation of vibrational spectral weight within a narrow frequency window that depends only weakly on wavevector. This is presented as an alternative to propagating excitations and is supported by reanalysis of existing experimental and simulation literature data together with new 2D and 3D simulations of amorphous systems, which together are claimed to provide converging evidence that sharply constrains theoretical models.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work offers a dynamical-structure-factor-based perspective that could unify disparate observations of the boson peak and limit the viable mechanisms to those producing flat-band-like features rather than dispersive or localized modes. The combination of literature reanalysis with new simulations is a positive aspect, though the overall significance depends on whether the evidence uniquely rules out alternatives such as strongly damped acoustic branches.

major comments (2)
  1. [simulation results and literature reanalysis sections] The central claim that the boson-peak feature cannot be accounted for by overdamped propagating modes (with Γ(q) comparable to or larger than ω(q)) requires explicit model comparison. The reanalysis of literature data and the new 2D/3D simulation results should include residual-dispersion checks or direct fits to damped-branch models to demonstrate that the observed weak q-dependence is not reproduced by such alternatives; without this, the converging-evidence argument does not yet uniquely favor the flat-band picture.
  2. [introduction and methods] The definition of the 'flat or weakly dispersive band' and the quantitative criterion for 'weakly dependent on wavevector' should be stated more precisely (e.g., via a specific bound on dω/dq or on the q-variation of the peak position in S(q,ω)) so that the claim can be tested against the presented data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods] Clarify the precise definition of the dynamical structure factor used in the simulations and how it is computed from the vibrational modes.
  2. [simulation details] Add a brief discussion of how the new simulations avoid post-hoc selection of frequency windows when identifying the boson-peak feature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional analyses where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [simulation results and literature reanalysis sections] The central claim that the boson-peak feature cannot be accounted for by overdamped propagating modes (with Γ(q) comparable to or larger than ω(q)) requires explicit model comparison. The reanalysis of literature data and the new 2D/3D simulation results should include residual-dispersion checks or direct fits to damped-branch models to demonstrate that the observed weak q-dependence is not reproduced by such alternatives; without this, the converging-evidence argument does not yet uniquely favor the flat-band picture.

    Authors: We agree that explicit model comparisons would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add direct fits of S(q,ω) to damped acoustic-branch models (including the damped harmonic oscillator form with Γ(q) ≥ ω(q)) together with residual-dispersion plots for both the literature data sets and our new 2D/3D simulations. These additions will quantify the mismatch between the observed near-constant peak position and the q-dependent behavior expected from overdamped propagating modes, thereby making the converging-evidence argument more explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [introduction and methods] The definition of the 'flat or weakly dispersive band' and the quantitative criterion for 'weakly dependent on wavevector' should be stated more precisely (e.g., via a specific bound on dω/dq or on the q-variation of the peak position in S(q,ω)) so that the claim can be tested against the presented data.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised introduction and methods we will introduce a precise operational definition: a band is classified as 'weakly dispersive' when the boson-peak frequency ω_bp(q) varies by less than 15 % across the wave-vector interval 0 < q < q_max (where q_max is the position of the first peak in the static structure factor). This bound will be applied uniformly to the reanalyzed experimental and simulation data as well as to our new results, allowing direct testing of the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reinterpretive perspective supported by independent reanalysis and simulations

full rationale

The paper defines the boson peak via its traditional excess DOS and proposes an additional dynamical signature (weakly q-dependent spectral weight accumulation) as a perspective, then supports it by re-examining literature data and running new 2D/3D simulations. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain consists of observational reanalysis rather than a mathematical prediction forced by prior definitions or author-specific theorems, rendering the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard definition of the boson peak as excess low-energy density of states and on the assumption that dynamical structure factor features can be interpreted as flat bands without additional fitting parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The boson peak is defined as a low-energy excess in the vibrational density of states and heat capacity relative to Debye theory.
    This is the conventional starting point invoked in the abstract for all subsequent reinterpretation.
invented entities (1)
  • flat or weakly dispersive band no independent evidence
    purpose: To reinterpret the boson peak as accumulation of spectral weight in a narrow, wavevector-independent frequency window.
    Introduced in the abstract as the defining dynamical feature; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the reanalyzed data is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5692 in / 1341 out tokens · 44449 ms · 2026-05-18T18:50:00.834369+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The boson peak appears as a disper- sionless mode of ≈ 4 meV in the recorded time-of-flight spectra

    with permission from the authors. The solid black line is the dispersion of the longitudinal acoustic phonon. The horizontal cyan solid line indicates the BP frequency. and hence to the spectral function (the imaginary part of the Green’s function), which encodes the system’s vi- brational modes. Figure 9(a) shows the normalized spectral function as a fun...

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    flat mode

    The list spans a broad range of amorphous materi- als, including v-GeO 2 glass [44], metallic glasses [45, 46], chalcogenides [47, 48], organic systems [49–51], and even water [52], thus enlarging the spectrum of cases where the “flat mode” has been observed. In Fig. 13, we repro- duce the results of Ref. [48] for glassy SiSe 2, where in- elastic neutron ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    include at least one low-energy excitation that is optic-like and clearly distinct from acoustic phonons

    work page

  4. [4]

    predict the emergence of this additional low-energy mode whose dispersion relation is approximately flat in wavevector

    work page

  5. [5]

    optic-like

    demonstrate that the energy of this dispersionless mode coincides with the excess observed in the vi- brational density of states. If accepted, these constraints challenge various proposed theories for the boson peak in glasses (see [12] for a review of the most famous approaches), as the only ones that predict, allow, or naturally coexist with a flat, no...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Debye, Annalen der Physik 344, 789

    P. Debye, Annalen der Physik 344, 789

    work page

  7. [7]

    Normal mode decomposition of atomic motion in solids,

    J. Moon, “Normal mode decomposition of atomic motion in solids,” (2023), arXiv:2309.03140

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Phonons as Goldstone Bosons

    H. Leutwyler, Helv. Phys. Acta 70, 275 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9609466

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    Kittel and P

    C. Kittel and P. McEuen, Introduction to solid state physics (John Wiley & Sons, 2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    R. C. Zeller and R. O. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B 4, 2029 (1971)

    work page 2029

  11. [11]

    Buchenau, N

    U. Buchenau, N. N¨ ucker, and A. J. Dianoux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2316 (1984)

    work page 1984

  12. [12]

    Buchenau, M

    U. Buchenau, M. Prager, N. N¨ ucker, A. J. Dianoux, N. Ahmad, and W. A. Phillips, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5665 (1986)

    work page 1986

  13. [13]

    Hehlen, E

    B. Hehlen, E. Courtens, R. Vacher, A. Yamanaka, M. Kataoka, and K. Inoue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5355 (2000)

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    Sette, M

    F. Sette, M. H. Krisch, C. Masciovecchio, G. Ruocco, and G. Monaco, Science 280, 1550 (1998)

    work page 1998

  15. [15]

    A. I. Chumakov, I. Sergueev, U. van B¨ urck, W. Schirma- cher, T. Asthalter, R. R¨ uffer, O. Leupold, and W. Petry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 245508 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Kabeya, T

    M. Kabeya, T. Mori, Y. Fujii, A. Koreeda, B. W. Lee, J.- H. Ko, and S. Kojima, Phys. Rev. B 94, 224204 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Ramos, Low-temperature Thermal And Vibrational Properties Of Disordered Solids: A Half-century Of Uni- versal ”Anomalies” Of Glasses (World Scientific Publish- ing Company, 2022)

    M. Ramos, Low-temperature Thermal And Vibrational Properties Of Disordered Solids: A Half-century Of Uni- versal ”Anomalies” Of Glasses (World Scientific Publish- ing Company, 2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Hu and H

    Y.-C. Hu and H. Tanaka, Nature Physics 18, 669 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Hu and H

    Y.-C. Hu and H. Tanaka, Physical Review Research 5, 023055 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Flubacher, A

    P. Flubacher, A. Leadbetter, J. Morrison, and B. Sto- icheff, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 12, 53 (1959)

    work page 1959

  21. [21]

    Nakayama, Reports on Progress in Physics 65, 1195 (2002)

    T. Nakayama, Reports on Progress in Physics 65, 1195 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    Boson peak in covalent network glasses: Isostaticity and marginal stability,

    H. Mizuno, T. Mori, G. Baldi, and E. Minamitani, “Boson peak in covalent network glasses: Isostaticity and marginal stability,” (2025), arXiv:2508.20481 [cond- mat.dis-nn]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Kob and H

    W. Kob and H. C. Andersen, Physical Review E 51, 4626 (1995)

    work page 1995

  24. [24]

    Das and S

    P. Das and S. Sastry, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X 14, 100098 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Sastry, PhysChemComm 3, 79 (2000)

    S. Sastry, PhysChemComm 3, 79 (2000)

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Dauchot, S

    O. Dauchot, S. Karmakar, I. Procaccia, and J. Zylberg, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046105 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Chattoraj and M

    J. Chattoraj and M. P. Ciamarra, Physical Review Let- ters 124, 028001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, M

    K. Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, M. Shivam, Y. Zheng, M. P. Cia- marra, and E. Lerner, Physical Review E 103, 022605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, M

    K. Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, M. Shivam, Y. Zheng, M. P. Cia- marra, and E. Lerner, Physical Review E 103, 022606 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Zheng, S

    Y. Zheng, S. Mahajan, J. Chattoraj, and M. Pica Cia- marra, Frontiers in Physics 9, 665391 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    M. I. Mendelev, Y. Sun, F. Zhang, C. Z. Wang, and K. M. Ho, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 214502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Nos´ e’, J

    S. Nos´ e’, J. Chem. Phys.81, 511 (1984)

    work page 1984

  33. [33]

    Y. Wang, L. Hong, Y. Wang, W. Schirmacher, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174207 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Jiang, Z

    C. Jiang, Z. Zheng, Y. Chen, M. Baggioli, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 188302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    T. S. Majmudar and R. P. Behringer, Nature 435, 1079 (2005)

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. Zheng, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Jin, L. Hong, Y. Wang, and J. Zhang, Nature Communications 8, 67 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Binder and W

    K. Binder and W. Kob, Glassy Materials and Disordered Solids: An Introduction to Their Statistical Mechanics , G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series (World Scientific, 2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Baldi, V

    G. Baldi, V. M. Giordano, G. Monaco, F. Sette, E. Fabi- ani, A. Fontana, and G. Ruocco, Phys. Rev. B 77, 214309 (2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Ruzicka, T

    B. Ruzicka, T. Scopigno, S. Caponi, A. Fontana, O. Pilla, P. Giura, G. Monaco, E. Pontecorvo, G. Ruocco, and F. Sette, Phys. Rev. B 69, 100201 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Vibrational dynamics of non-crystalline solids,

    G. Baldi, A. Fontana, and G. Monaco, “Vibrational dynamics of non-crystalline solids,” in Low-Temperature Thermal and Vibrational Properties of Disordered Solids, Chap. Chapter 6, pp. 177–226

    work page

  41. [41]

    Tømterud, S

    M. Tømterud, S. D. Eder, C. B¨ uchner, L. Wondraczek, I. Simonsen, W. Schirmacher, J. R. Manson, and B. Holst, Nature Physics 19, 1910 (2023)

    work page 1910

  42. [42]

    Amorim and F

    B. Amorim and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B 88, 115418 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Steurer, A

    W. Steurer, A. Apfolter, M. Koch, W. E. Ernst, B. Holst, E. Sønderg˚ ard, and J. R. Manson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 035503 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    Tømterud, S

    M. Tømterud, S. D. Eder, S. K. Hellner, C. B¨ uchner, M. Heyde, H.-J. Freund, S. Forti, D. Convertino, C. Co- letti, J. R. Manson, and B. Holst, Phys. Rev. B 111, 205423 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Meyer, J

    A. Meyer, J. Wuttke, W. Petry, A. Peker, R. Bormann, G. Coddens, L. Kranich, O. G. Randl, and H. Schober, Phys. Rev. B 53, 12107 (1996)

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    X. Li, H. Zhang, S. Lan, D. Abernathy, C. Hu, L. Fan, M. Li, and X.-L. Wang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03466 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Inoue, T

    K. Inoue, T. Kanaya, S. Ikeda, K. Kaji, K. Shibata, M. Misawa, and Y. Kiyanagi, The Journal of chemical physics 95, 5332 (1991)

    work page 1991

  48. [48]

    Ruffl´ e, G

    B. Ruffl´ e, G. Guimbreti` ere, E. Courtens, R. Vacher, and G. Monaco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 045502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    L. E. Bove, E. Fabiani, A. Fontana, F. Paoletti, C. Petrillo, O. Pilla, and I. C. V. Bento, Europhysics Letters 71, 563 (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    Bruna, G

    P. Bruna, G. Baldi, E. Pineda, J. Serrano, J. B. Suck, D. Crespo, and G. Monaco, The Journal of Chemical Physics 135, 101101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Ichitsubo, E

    T. Ichitsubo, E. Matsubara, K. Miyagi, W. Itaka, K. Tanaka, and S. Hosokawa, Phys. Rev. B 78, 052202 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Orsingher, G

    L. Orsingher, G. Baldi, A. Fontana, L. E. Bove, T. Un- ruh, A. Orecchini, C. Petrillo, N. Violini, and F. Sac- chetti, Phys. Rev. B 82, 115201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Zanatta, A

    M. Zanatta, A. Fontana, A. Orecchini, C. Petrillo, and F. Sacchetti, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 4, 1143 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Violini, A

    N. Violini, A. Orecchini, A. Paciaroni, C. Petrillo, and F. Sacchetti, Phys. Rev. B 85, 134204 (2012). 11

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Baldi, P

    G. Baldi, P. Benassi, A. Fontana, A. Giugni, G. Monaco, M. Nardone, and F. Rossi, The Journal of Chemical Physics 147, 164501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Scopigno, E

    T. Scopigno, E. Pontecorvo, R. D. Leonardo, M. Krisch, G. Monaco, G. Ruocco, B. Ruzicka, and F. Sette, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, S1269 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Pontecorvo, M

    E. Pontecorvo, M. Krisch, A. Cunsolo, G. Monaco, A. Mermet, R. Verbeni, F. Sette, and G. Ruocco, Phys. Rev. E 71, 011501 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [58]

    Monaco and S

    G. Monaco and S. Mossa, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 16907 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [59]

    J. B. Suck, H. Rudin, H. J. G¨ untherodt, and H. Beck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 49 (1983)

    work page 1983

  60. [60]

    V. K. Yu.M. Galperin and V. Kozub, Advances in Physics 38, 669 (1989)

    work page 1989

  61. [61]

    Schober and C

    H. Schober and C. Oligschleger, Physical Review B 53, 11469 (1996)

    work page 1996

  62. [62]

    V. L. Gurevich, D. A. Parshin, and H. R. Schober, Phys. Rev. B 67, 094203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  63. [63]

    D. A. Parshin, H. R. Schober, and V. L. Gurevich, Phys. Rev. B 76, 064206 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Beyond the standard tunneling model: The soft-potential model,

    M. A. Ramos and U. Buchenau, “Beyond the standard tunneling model: The soft-potential model,” in Tunnel- ing Systems in Amorphous and Crystalline Solids , edited by P. Esquinazi (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1998) pp. 527–569

    work page 1998

  65. [65]

    Lerner and E

    E. Lerner and E. Bouchbinder, The Journal of Chemical Physics 158, 194503 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Wang, H.-B. Yu, and J. F. Douglas, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154, 084505 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Jiang, M

    C. Jiang, M. Baggioli, and J. F. Douglas, The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 214505 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Jiang and M

    C. Jiang and M. Baggioli, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 505101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    DeGiuli, A

    E. DeGiuli, A. Laversanne-Finot, G. D ˜A¼ring, E. Lerner, and M. Wyart, Soft Matter 10, 5628 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Lerner and E

    E. Lerner and E. Bouchbinder, The Journal of Chemical Physics 155, 200901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    D. A. Ackerman, D. Moy, R. C. Potter, A. C. Anderson, and W. N. Lawless, Phys. Rev. B 23, 3886 (1981)

    work page 1981

  72. [72]

    Cano and A

    A. Cano and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 245902 (2004)

    work page 2004

  73. [73]

    Cano and A

    A. Cano and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. B 70, 212301 (2004)

    work page 2004

  74. [74]

    Moratalla, J

    M. Moratalla, J. F. Gebbia, M. A. Ramos, L. C. Pardo, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Rudic, F. Fernandez-Alonso, F. J. Bermejo, and J. L. Tamarit, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    A. I. Krivchikov, A. Je˙ zowski, D. Szewczyk, O. A. Ko- rolyuk, O. O. Romantsova, L. M. Buravtseva, C. Cazorla, and J. L. Tamarit, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 5061 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Baggioli and A

    M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone, International Journal of Modern Physics B 35, 2130002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    J. M. Schliesser and B. F. Woodfield, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 285402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    Baggioli and A

    M. Baggioli and A. Zaccone, Journal of Physics: Materi- als 3, 015004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    S. V. Mandyam, W. Dong, X. Yan, B. Zhao, J. Lin, T. Xia, Z. Zhao, X. Chen, J. Ma, H. Xing, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03155 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025