pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.07312 · v4 · submitted 2025-09-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall

Coherent transport in two-dimensional disordered potentials under spatially uniform SU(2) gauge fields

Masataka Kakoi , Christian Miniatura , Keith Slevin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hall
keywords coherent backscatteringdisordered potentialsSU(2) gauge fieldsspin-orbit couplingmultiple scatteringultracold atomstransient interferencenon-Abelian effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

A spin-1/2 particle in a 2D disordered potential with uniform SU(2) gauge field shows a transient backscattering peak offset from exact backscatter, coexisting with a coherent backscattering dip in the short-time regime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines interference effects for a spin-1/2 particle propagating in a two-dimensional disordered potential under generalized spin-orbit coupling. Starting from a spin-polarized plane-wave state, a transient backscattering peak offset from the exact backscattering direction appears before spin and momentum distributions reach steady states, alongside a coherent backscattering dip. This offset receives an intuitive account via a non-Abelian gauge transformation. The full time evolution of the peak, from buildup through decay, receives a precise dephasing-time prediction inside a perturbative multiple-scattering framework. The results apply to any spatially uniform SU(2) gauge field, including synthetic ones realized in ultracold atoms.

Core claim

In the short-time regime, before the spin and momentum distributions reach their steady states, a transient backscattering peak offset from the exact backscattering direction is observed coexisting with a coherent backscattering dip. The offset is explained using a non-Abelian gauge transformation. The full time evolution of the transient peak, from its buildup to its decay with a precise prediction of the dephasing time, is described within a perturbative framework for multiple scattering.

What carries the argument

Non-Abelian gauge transformation that maps the observed momentum offset of the transient backscattering peak under a spatially uniform SU(2) gauge field.

If this is right

  • The offset backscattering peak coexists with the coherent backscattering dip in the momentum distribution at short times.
  • The dephasing time of the transient peak follows a precise prediction from the perturbative multiple-scattering treatment.
  • The described phenomena hold for general spatially uniform SU(2) gauge fields realizable as synthetic fields in ultracold atoms.
  • The transient features appear before the system reaches steady-state spin and momentum distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Short-time measurements in ultracold-atom setups could isolate non-Abelian gauge signatures before disorder-driven localization sets in.
  • The same perturbative approach may be testable in other uniform gauge-field geometries or in three-dimensional realizations.
  • The offset-peak mechanism suggests a route to distinguish Abelian from non-Abelian contributions in coherent-transport experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative multiple-scattering framework accurately captures the dephasing time of the offset peak in the short-time regime without higher-order effects dominating.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the position of the transient backscattering peak and finds it inconsistent with the offset predicted by the non-Abelian gauge transformation, or measures a dephasing time differing from the perturbative calculation, would falsify the claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07312 by Christian Miniatura, Keith Slevin, Masataka Kakoi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (c), we find a robust CBS dip appearing at −k0. For Hamiltonians that commute with a time-reversal op￾erator Tˆ with Tˆ 2 = −1, the transition amplitudes be￾tween time-reversed states are exactly zero at all times, irrespective of the disorder configuration [18, 19]. States at ±k0 on the same branch of the Fermi surface are pre￾cisely related by time-reversal symmetry. This destruc￾tive interference effect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. New frame: For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Semi-log plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study interference effects in the dynamics of a spin-$1/2$ particle propagating in two dimensions in a disordered potential and subject to a generalized spin-orbit coupling. With the particle initially in a spin-polarized plane wave state, in the short-time regime, before the spin and momentum distributions reach their steady states, we observe a transient backscattering peak offset from the exact backscattering direction, coexisting with a coherent backscattering dip. We present an intuitive explanation of this momentum offset using a non-Abelian gauge transformation. We also describe the full time evolution of the transient peak, from its buildup to its decay with a precise prediction of the dephasing time within a perturbative framework for multiple scattering. Our results can be applied to general spatially uniform SU(2) gauge fields, including the synthetic gauge field in ultracold atoms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines the short-time dynamics of a spin-1/2 particle in a 2D disordered potential under a spatially uniform SU(2) gauge field (generalized spin-orbit coupling). Starting from a spin-polarized plane-wave initial state, it reports a transient backscattering peak offset from exact backscattering that coexists with a coherent backscattering dip; the offset is attributed to a non-Abelian gauge transformation, and the full time evolution of the peak (buildup and decay) including an explicit dephasing time is derived within a perturbative multiple-scattering framework. The results are positioned as applicable to synthetic gauge fields realizable in ultracold-atom experiments.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies an intuitive non-Abelian gauge explanation for an offset transient peak and a concrete perturbative prediction for its dephasing time in 2D. This could be useful for interpreting coherent-transport experiments with synthetic gauge fields, particularly in the pre-steady-state regime where standard weak-localization pictures do not yet apply.

major comments (2)
  1. [perturbative multiple-scattering framework section] The perturbative multiple-scattering derivation of the dephasing time (presented as accurate for the short-time regime) does not appear to include or bound the contribution of recurrent scattering diagrams. In 2D, such diagrams grow with time even before steady state and can shift interference features by amounts comparable to the reported momentum offset; the manuscript should either resum the relevant series or demonstrate that these terms remain negligible up to the quoted dephasing time.
  2. [numerical results and comparison to theory] The numerical evidence for the offset peak and its decay is stated to support the perturbative prediction, yet no quantitative error analysis, fitting procedure, or exclusion of higher-order effects is described. Without these, it is unclear whether the observed dephasing time is robust or sensitive to the disorder strength and system size used in the simulations.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the 'short-time regime' (e.g., in terms of mean free time or scattering events) so that the validity window of the perturbative prediction is unambiguous.
  2. Add a brief comparison to existing literature on coherent backscattering in Rashba or Dresselhaus spin-orbit systems to highlight the novelty of the non-Abelian gauge transformation approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the potential significance of our findings regarding the transient offset backscattering peak in systems with uniform SU(2) gauge fields. Below, we address each of the major comments in detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [perturbative multiple-scattering framework section] The perturbative multiple-scattering derivation of the dephasing time (presented as accurate for the short-time regime) does not appear to include or bound the contribution of recurrent scattering diagrams. In 2D, such diagrams grow with time even before steady state and can shift interference features by amounts comparable to the reported momentum offset; the manuscript should either resum the relevant series or demonstrate that these terms remain negligible up to the quoted dephasing time.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of recurrent scattering diagrams in two-dimensional systems, as they can indeed contribute to interference corrections that grow with time. Our perturbative derivation focuses on the dominant contributions in the short-time limit. We will include in the revised manuscript a bound on the recurrent diagram contributions, showing that they are negligible up to the dephasing time by estimating their scaling with time and disorder strength. This avoids the need for full resummation in the regime of interest. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [numerical results and comparison to theory] The numerical evidence for the offset peak and its decay is stated to support the perturbative prediction, yet no quantitative error analysis, fitting procedure, or exclusion of higher-order effects is described. Without these, it is unclear whether the observed dephasing time is robust or sensitive to the disorder strength and system size used in the simulations.

    Authors: We agree that providing a quantitative error analysis would improve the clarity of the numerical validation. The simulations in the manuscript involve time evolution of the wave function in finite disordered systems with averaging over disorder realizations. In the revised manuscript, we will include standard deviations from the ensemble average as error bars, detail the procedure for fitting the decay of the peak to extract the dephasing time, and show results for varying disorder strengths to confirm robustness. Our checks indicate that the dephasing time is insensitive to system size in the regime where the mean free path is much smaller than the system size. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains independent

full rationale

The paper's central results—the transient backscattering peak offset explained via non-Abelian gauge transformation and the dephasing time obtained from perturbative multiple-scattering interference terms—are derived directly from the model of a spin-1/2 particle in a 2D disordered potential plus spatially uniform SU(2) gauge field. The gauge transformation is a change of basis that maps the problem to an equivalent Abelian case with shifted momentum, yielding the offset as a mathematical consequence rather than a fit. The dephasing time follows from explicit lowest-order diagrammatic calculation of the time-dependent interference in the short-time regime, without reference to fitted parameters or post-hoc adjustment to match the offset. No load-bearing self-citation chain or self-definitional loop is present; the perturbative framework is standard and externally verifiable against the stated Hamiltonian. The derivation is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard quantum mechanics for wave propagation in disordered potentials and perturbative multiple scattering; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are identifiable from the abstract alone.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The dynamics are governed by a spin-1/2 Hamiltonian with disordered potential plus uniform SU(2) gauge field term.
    This is the physical setup stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Perturbative multiple-scattering theory applies accurately to the short-time dephasing process.
    Invoked for the precise prediction of dephasing time.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5687 in / 1502 out tokens · 55376 ms · 2026-05-18T18:47:10.376875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kuga and A

    Y. Kuga and A. Ishimaru, Retroreflectance from a dense distribution of spherical particles, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1, 831 (1984)

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    M. P. Van Albada and A. Lagendijk, Observation of Weak Localization of Light in a Random Medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 2692 (1985); P.-E. Wolf and G. Maret, Weak Localization and Coherent Backscattering of Pho- tons in Disordered Media,ibid.55, 2696 (1985)

    work page 1985

  3. [3]

    Labeyrie, F

    G. Labeyrie, F. de Tomasi, J.-C. Bernard, C. A. M¨ uller, C. Miniatura, and R. Kaiser, Coherent Backscattering of Light by Cold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 5266 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Bayer and T

    G. Bayer and T. Niederdr¨ ank, Weak localization of acous- tic waves in strongly scattering media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3884 (1993)

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Larose, L

    E. Larose, L. Margerin, B. A. van Tiggelen, and M. Campillo, Weak Localization of Seismic Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 048501 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Jendrzejewski, K

    F. Jendrzejewski, K. M¨ uller, J. Richard, A. Date, T. Plis- son, P. Bouyer, A. Aspect, and V. Josse, Coherent Backscattering of Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 195302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Labeyrie, T

    G. Labeyrie, T. Karpiuk, J.-F. Schaff, B. Gr´ emaud, C. Miniatura, and D. Delande, Enhanced backscattering of a dilute Bose-Einstein condensate, EPL100, 66001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Hainaut, I

    C. Hainaut, I. Manai, R. Chicireanu, J.-F. Cl´ ement, S. Zemmouri, J. C. Garreau, P. Szriftgiser, G. Lemari´ e, N. Cherroret, and D. Delande, Return to the Origin as a Probe of Atomic Phase Coherence, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 184101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Sigwarth and C

    O. Sigwarth and C. Miniatura, Time reversal and reci- procity, AAPPS Bull.32, 23 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Bergmann, Weak localization in thin films: a time-of- flight experiment with conduction electrons, Phys

    G. Bergmann, Weak localization in thin films: a time-of- flight experiment with conduction electrons, Phys. Rep. 107, 1 (1984)

    work page 1984

  11. [11]

    P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.57, 287 (1985)

    work page 1985

  12. [12]

    Micklitz, C

    T. Micklitz, C. A. M¨ uller, and A. Altland, Echo spec- troscopy of Anderson localization, Phys. Rev. B91, 064203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    M¨ uller, J

    K. M¨ uller, J. Richard, V. V. Volchkov, V. Denechaud, P. Bouyer, A. Aspect, and V. Josse, Suppression and Revival of Weak Localization through Control of Time- Reversal Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 205301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Li, X.-H

    Z.-L. Li, X.-H. Li, and Y. Wan, Time-domain interfer- ometry of electron weak localization through terahertz nonlinear response, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033125 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Cherroret, T

    N. Cherroret, T. Karpiuk, C. A. M¨ uller, B. Gr´ emaud, and C. Miniatura, Coherent backscattering of ultracold matter waves: Momentum space signatures, Phys. Rev. A85, 011604(R) (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Scoquart, T

    T. Scoquart, T. Wellens, D. Delande, and N. Cherroret, Quench dynamics of a weakly interacting disordered Bose gas in momentum space, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033349 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Cherroret, T

    N. Cherroret, T. Scoquart, and D. Delande, Coherent multiple scattering of out-of-equilibrium interacting Bose gases, Ann. Phys.435, 168543 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Arabahmadi, D

    E. Arabahmadi, D. Schumayer, B. Gr´ emaud, C. Miniatura, and D. A. W. Hutchinson, Momentum- space signatures of the Anderson transition in a symplectic, two-dimensional, disordered ultracold gas, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L012021 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Kakoi and K

    M. Kakoi and K. Slevin, Time evolution of coherent wave propagation and spin relaxation in spin-orbit-coupled systems, Phys. Rev. A109, 033303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Hainaut, I

    C. Hainaut, I. Manai, J.-F. Cl´ ement, J. C. Garreau, P. Szriftgiser, G. Lemari´ e, N. Cherroret, D. Delande, and R. Chicireanu, Controlling symmetry and localiza- tion with an artificial gauge field in a disordered quantum system, Nat. Commun.9, 1382 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Hikami, A

    S. Hikami, A. I. Larkin, and Y. Nagaoka, Spin-Orbit In- teraction and Magnetoresistance in the Two Dimensional Random System, Prog. Theor. Phys.63, 707 (1980)

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    Ando and T

    T. Ando and T. Nakanishi, Impurity Scattering in Car- bon Nanotubes – Absence of Back Scattering –, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.67, 1704 (1998); T. Ando, T. Nakanishi, and R. Saito, Berry’s Phase and Absence of Back Scattering in Carbon Nanotubes, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.67, 2857 (1998)

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    McCann, K

    E. McCann, K. Kechedzhi, V. I. Fal’ko, H. Suzuura, T. Ando, and B. L. Altshuler, Weak-Localization Mag- netoresistance and Valley Symmetry in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 146805 (2006)

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Ando, Topological Insulator Materials, J

    Y. Ando, Topological Insulator Materials, J. Phys. Soc. 6 Jpn.82, 102001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photon.9, 796 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Y. Yang, B. Yang, G. Ma, J. Li, S. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Non-Abelian physics in light and sound, Science 383, eadf9621 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    L. B. Ma, S. L. Li, V. M. Fomin, M. Hentschel, J. B. G¨ otte, Y. Yin, M. R. Jorgensen, and O. G. Schmidt, Spin–orbit coupling of light in asymmetric microcavities, Nat. Commun.7, 10983 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    Rechci´ nska, M

    K. Rechci´ nska, M. Kr´ ol, R. Mazur, P. Morawiak, R. Mirek, K. Lempicka, W. Bardyszewski, M. Ma- tuszewski, P. Kula, W. Piecek, P. G. Lagoudakis, B. Pi¸ etka, and J. Szczytko, Engineering spin-orbit syn- thetic Hamiltonians in liquid-crystal optical cavities, Sci- ence366, 727 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Chen, R.-Y

    Y. Chen, R.-Y. Zhang, Z. Xiong, Z. H. Hang, J. Li, J. Q. Shen, and C. T. Chan, Non-Abelian gauge field optics, Nat. Commun.10, 3125 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Polimeno, A

    L. Polimeno, A. Fieramosca, G. Lerario, L. D. Marco, M. D. Giorgi, D. Ballarini, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. Pugliese, C. T. Prontera, V. Maiorano, G. Gigli, C. Leblanc, G. Malpuech, D. D. Solnyshkov, and D. San- vitto, Experimental investigation of a non-Abelian gauge field in 2D perovskite photonic platform, Optica8, 1442 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Y. Li, X. Ma, X. Zhai, M. Gao, H. Dai, S. Schu- macher, and T. Gao, Manipulating polariton condensates by Rashba-Dresselhaus coupling at room temperature, Nat. Commun.13, 3785 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    J. Wu, Z. Wang, Y. Biao, F. Fei, S. Zhang, Z. Yin, Y. Hu, Z. Song, T. Wu, F. Song, and R. Yu, Non-Abelian gauge fields in circuit systems, Nat. Electron.5, 635 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Galitski and I

    V. Galitski and I. B. Spielman, Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases, Nature (London)494, 49 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Ruseckas, G

    J. Ruseckas, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and M. Fleis- chhauer, Non-Abelian Gauge Potentials for Ultracold Atoms with Degenerate Dark States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010404 (2005)

    work page 2005

  35. [35]

    X.-J. Liu, M. F. Borunda, X. Liu, and J. Sinova, Effect of Induced Spin-Orbit Coupling for Atoms via Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 046402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    D. L. Campbell, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and I. B. Spielman, Real- istic Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling for neu- tral atoms, Phys. Rev. A84, 025602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, and I. B. Spielman, Spin- orbit-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates, Nature (Lon- don)471, 83 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Wang, Z.-Q

    P. Wang, Z.-Q. Yu, Z. Fu, J. Miao, L. Huang, S. Chai, H. Zhai, and J. Zhang, Spin-Orbit Coupled Degenerate Fermi Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 095301 (2012); L. W. Cheuk, A. T. Sommer, Z. Hadzibabic, T. Yefsah, W. S. Bakr, and M. W. Zwierlein, Spin-Injection Spectroscopy of a Spin-Orbit Coupled Fermi Gas,ibid.109, 095302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Huang, Z

    L. Huang, Z. Meng, P. Wang, P. Peng, S.-L. Zhang, L. C. Chen, D. Li, Q. Zhou, and J. Zhang, Experimental real- ization of two-dimensional synthetic spin-orbit coupling in ultracold Fermi gases, Nat. Phys.12, 540 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.-C. Ji, Y. Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates, Science354, 83 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Leroux, K

    F. Leroux, K. Pandey, R. Rehbi, F. Chevy, C. Miniatura, B. Gr´ emaud, and D. Wilkowski, Non-Abelian adiabatic geometric transformations in a cold strontium gas, Nat. Commun.9, 3580 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Wang, X.-C

    Z.-Y. Wang, X.-C. Cheng, B.-Z. Wang, J.-Y. Zhang, Y.- H. Lu, C.-R. Yi, S. Niu, Y. Deng, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of an ideal Weyl semimetal band in a quantum gas with 3D spin-orbit coupling, Science 372, 271 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Liang, Z

    Q. Liang, Z. Dong, J.-S. Pan, H. Wang, H. Li, Z. Yang, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Chiral dynamics of ultracold atoms under a tunable SU(2) synthetic gauge field, Nat. Phys. 20, 1738 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    C. S. Madasu, C. Mitra, L. Gabardos, K. D. Rathod, T. Zanon-Willette, C. Miniatura, F. Chevy, C. Kwong, and D. Wilkowski, Experimental realization of a SU(3) color-orbit coupling in an ultracold gas, arXiv:2502.04714

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    spin–orbit coupling

    We use the term “spin–orbit coupling” for convenience, though general couplings between momentum and inter- nal degree of freedom, such as sublattice and polarization, are included

    work page

  46. [46]

    Hasan, C

    M. Hasan, C. S. Madasu, K. D. Rathod, C. C. Kwong, C. Miniatura, F. Chevy, and D. Wilkowski, Wave Packet Dynamics in Synthetic Non-Abelian Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    See Supplemental Material for details

    work page

  48. [48]

    Thus, ford≥3, the corresponding gauge field in the appropriate frame would only have 3 spatial com- ponents, one proportional to ˆσ 1, the second to ˆσ 2 and the last to ˆσ3

    More generally, and along with [47], for a spin 1/2 parti- cle moving indspatial dimensions,Mwould be (d×3) real matrix and the number of singular values would be min(d,3). Thus, ford≥3, the corresponding gauge field in the appropriate frame would only have 3 spatial com- ponents, one proportional to ˆσ 1, the second to ˆσ 2 and the last to ˆσ3

    work page

  49. [49]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C17, 6039 (1984)

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    work page 1955

  51. [51]

    Winkler, Spin orientation and spin precession in inversion-asymmetric quasi-two-dimensional electron systems, Phys

    R. Winkler, Spin orientation and spin precession in inversion-asymmetric quasi-two-dimensional electron systems, Phys. Rev. B69, 045317 (2004)

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    J. A. C. Weideman and B. M. Herbst, Split-Step Methods for the Solution of the Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal.23, 485 (1986)

    work page 1986

  53. [53]

    B. A. Bernevig, J. Orenstein, and S.-C. Zhang, Exact SU(2) Symmetry and Persistent Spin Helix in a Spin- Orbit Coupled System, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 236601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    F. G. Pikus and G. E. Pikus, Conduction-band spin splitting and negative magnetoresistance inA 3B5 het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B51, 16928 (1995)

    work page 1995

  55. [55]

    P. J. Weigele, D. C. Marinescu, F. Dettwiler, J. Fu, S. Mack, J. C. Egues, D. D. Awschalom, and D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, Symmetry breaking of the persistent spin helix in quantum transport, Phys. Rev. B101, 035414 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    J. N. Fuchs, F. Pi´ echon, M. O. Goerbig, and G. Montam- baux, Topological Berry phase and semiclassical quanti- zation of cyclotron orbits for two dimensional electrons in coupled band models, Eur. Phys. J. B77, 351 (2010)

    work page 2010

  57. [57]

    K. L. Lee, B. Gr´ emaud, and C. Miniatura, Momentum- space dynamics of Dirac quasiparticles in correlated ran- dom potentials: Interplay between dynamical and Berry 7 phases, Phys. Rev. A89, 043622 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Lenke and G

    R. Lenke and G. Maret, Magnetic field effects on coherent backscattering of light, Eur. Phys. J. B17, 171 (2000); R. Lenke, R. Lehner, and G. Maret, Magnetic-field effects on coherent backscattering of light in case of Mie spheres, Europhys. Lett.52, 620 (2000)

    work page 2000

  59. [59]

    Akkermans and G

    E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux,Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons(Cambridge University Press, London, 2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    R. C. Kuhn, C. Miniatura, D. Delande, O. Sigwarth, and C. A. M¨ uller, Localization of Matter Waves in Two- Dimensional Disordered Optical Potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 250403 (2005); R. C. Kuhn, O. Sigwarth, C. Miniatura, D. Delande, and C. A. M¨ uller, Coherent matter wave transport in speckle potentials, New J. Phys. 9, 161 (2007)

    work page 2005

  61. [61]

    Kakoi, C

    M. Kakoi, C. Miniatura, and K. Slevin (unpublished)

    work page

  62. [62]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  63. [63]

    S. N. Evangelou and T. Ziman, The Anderson transition in two dimensions in the presence of spin-orbit coupling, J. Phys. C20, L235 (1987)

    work page 1987

  64. [64]

    Ando, Numerical study of symmetry effects on local- ization in two dimensions, Phys

    T. Ando, Numerical study of symmetry effects on local- ization in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B40, 5325 (1989)

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Asada, K

    Y. Asada, K. Slevin, and T. Ohtsuki, Anderson Transi- tion in Two-Dimensional Systems with Spin-Orbit Cou- pling, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 256601 (2002)

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Karpiuk, N

    T. Karpiuk, N. Cherroret, K. L. Lee, B. Gr´ emaud, C. A. M¨ uller, and C. Miniatura, Coherent Forward Scattering Peak Induced by Anderson Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 190601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  67. [67]

    Micklitz, C

    T. Micklitz, C. A. M¨ uller, and A. Altland, Strong An- derson Localization in Cold Atom Quantum Quenches, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 110602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    K. L. Lee, B. Gr´ emaud, and C. Miniatura, Dynam- ics of localized waves in one-dimensional random poten- tials: Statistical theory of the coherent forward scattering peak, Phys. Rev. A90, 043605 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Ghosh, N

    S. Ghosh, N. Cherroret, B. Gr´ emaud, C. Miniatura, and D. Delande, Coherent forward scattering in two- dimensional disordered systems, Phys. Rev. A90, 063602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. Miniatura, N. Cherroret, and D. Delande, Coherent forward scattering as a signature of Ander- son metal-insulator transitions, Phys. Rev. A95, 041602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Lemari´ e, C

    G. Lemari´ e, C. A. M¨ uller, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, and C. Miniatura, Coherent backscattering and forward- scattering peaks in the quantum kicked rotor, Phys. Rev. A95, 043626 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Arrouas, J

    F. Arrouas, J. H´ ebraud, N. Ombredane, E. Flament, D. Ronco, N. Dupont, G. Lemari´ e, B. Georgeot, C. Miniatura, J. Billy, B. Peaudecerf, and D. Gu´ ery- Odelin, The Coherent Forward Scattering peak: a probe of non-ergodicity and symmetries in a quantum chaotic system, arXiv:2503.01777. 8 Supplemental Material: Coherent Transport in Two-Dimensional Disor...

    work page arXiv