Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Ions leaving no tracks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Swift heavy ions leave no tracks in gamma-Ga2O3, whose disordered lattice heals the damage, while beta-Ga2O3 keeps crystalline gamma-phase tracks.

desk verdict The no-track observation in γ-Ga2O3 is experimentally convincing and worth refereeing; the fast-recovery mechanism is plausible but needs a tighter extrapolation and a detection limit. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07440 v2 pith:ZGPKN7V5 submitted 2025-09-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Azat Abdullaev , Javier Garcia Fernandez , Chloe Nozais , Jacques O'Connell , Rustem Tlegenov , Kairolla Sekerbayev , Alexander Azarov , Aleksi Leino
show 8 more authors
Tomas Fernandez Bouvier Junlei Zhao Aldo Artimez Pena Nikita Medvedev Zhandos Utegulov Oystein Prytz Flyura Djurabekova Andrej Kuznetsov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 61.80.Jh
keywords swiftheavyionsiontracksgamma-Ga2O3beta-Ga2O3polymorphheterostructuresradiationtolerancedisorderrecoverythermalconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Swift heavy ions—fast, heavy ions that normally leave nanoscale damage cylinders in insulators and semiconductors—leave no tracks in gamma-phase gallium oxide (gamma-Ga2O3), even at stopping powers up to 20 keV/nm where the beta phase (beta-Ga2O3) readily forms tracks. The paper makes this case by irradiating gamma/beta-Ga2O3 heterostructures with 50–147 MeV Kr ions and imaging with atomic-resolution electron microscopy, showing that tracks appear only in the beta layers. Thermal-conductivity profiling confirms that gamma-Ga2O3 stays homogeneous while beta-Ga2O3 degrades. The explanation is that gamma-Ga2O3 is intrinsically disordered—a defective spinel with many nearly equivalent atomic configurations—so the amorphous damage produced by an ion can rapidly recrystallize and erase itself. If correct, this identifies gamma-Ga2O3 as an unusually radiation-tolerant semiconductor that can be integrated with beta-Ga2O3 for devices in harsh radiation environments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing idea is the 'intrinsically disordered' gamma-Ga2O3 lattice: its defect spinel structure has a face-centred-cubic oxygen sublattice but Ga atoms distributed over octahedral and tetrahedral sites in many nearly degenerate arrangements. That configurational flexibility gives damaged regions many low-cost routes back to an ordered gamma lattice, so a track formed by an ion impact recrystallizes almost completely instead of persisting. The argument is carried by a multiscale simulation chain: Monte Carlo electron kinetics gives the energy deposited by the ion, molecular dynamics with a machine-learned potential follows the atomic response and long-term annealing, and the predicte

What would settle it

Irradiate gamma-Ga2O3 at cryogenic temperature and image without warming; if amorphous tracks remain and only disappear after deliberate annealing, the proposed ultrafast room-temperature healing is wrong. Also, independent barrier calculations or calorimetry could check the roughly 0.9 eV oxygen-sublattice recovery barrier used in the extrapolation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ion-track formation is not set by thermal conductivity or chemical identity but by how easily a lattice can absorb and erase disorder. In gamma-Ga2O3, swift heavy ions deposit energy much as they do in beta-Ga2O3, creating a transient amorphous region a few nanometres across; however, because the gamma-phase is already a disordered cubic spinel with multiple close-lying configurations, the oxygen sublattice returns to its face-centred-cubic stacking and the damaged zone recrystallizes to gamma-Ga2O3 in seconds to minutes at room temperature. In beta-Ga2O3, the same impact produces an amorphous track that recrystallizes into gamma-Ga2O3 and remains visibly embedded,

Load-bearing premise

The paper's room-temperature healing times are obtained by running simulations at 1000–1250 K and extrapolating to 300 K with an Arrhenius fit; if the oxygen-sublattice recovery at room temperature is much slower or follows another path, the erased-tracks explanation fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • gamma-Ga2O3 can maintain its structure, thermal conductivity, and electronic homogeneity under swift heavy ion irradiation up to at least 20 keV/nm.
  • Ion beams can be used to write crystalline gamma-Ga2O3 tracks inside beta-Ga2O3, offering a route to patterned polymorph heterostructures.
  • Thermal-conductivity depth profiling is a sensitive non-imaging probe of track damage: beta layers show clear drops, gamma layers do not.
  • The recovery is not marginal: it survives even when the initial amorphous region is larger than the standard impact produces, indicating a robust healing mechanism.
  • gamma/beta-Ga2O3 heterostructures could serve as a semiconductor platform for devices operating in extremely harsh radiation environments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is configurational disorder, then other intrinsically disordered polymorphs or high-entropy ceramics may show analogous track immunity; this is a testable prediction beyond the paper.
  • The Arrhenius extrapolation suggests beta-Ga2O3 tracks also heal their oxygen sublattice within minutes at room temperature; the reason they remain visible is that recrystallization stops at the metastable gamma-phase, not that healing fails.
  • The counterintuitive role of low thermal conductivity could be inverted: instead of trapping heat and promoting tracks, a low-conductivity but disordered lattice may quench into its own recoverable configuration, so thermal conductivity alone should not be used as a track-formation predictor.
  • Time-delayed microscopy after cryogenic irradiation could directly test the healing hypothesis at the laboratory scale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and modelling study of swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation of γ/β-Ga2O3 polymorph heterostructures. Using 50–147 MeV Kr ions, the authors observe clear ion tracks in β-Ga2O3, which are crystalline γ-phase regions embedded in the β matrix, while no tracks are observed in γ-Ga2O3 under identical irradiation conditions. Complementary depth-resolved thermal conductivity measurements show a decrease in β-Ga2O3 but not in γ-Ga2O3, corroborating the microscopy. The authors propose a mechanism: the SHI initially creates an amorphous track in both polymorphs, but the intrinsically disordered γ-Ga2O3 lattice undergoes rapid room-temperature recovery, erasing the track, whereas β-Ga2O3 recrystallizes into γ-Ga2O3, leaving a visible track. The mechanism is supported by multiscale simulations (TREKIS-3 Monte Carlo for electronic excitation and energy transfer, molecular dynamics with a machine-learned potential for atomic response, and abTEM image simulation) and by back-loop comparison with experimental STEM images.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a material—γ-Ga2O3—that is exceptionally resistant to swift heavy ion track formation despite its low thermal conductivity, which is counterintuitive and relevant for radiation-hard device applications. The experimental design is a clear strength: the γ/β heterostructure allows direct, side-by-side comparison under identical irradiation, ruling out beam or fluence variations. The thermal conductivity data provide an independent, non-microscopic confirmation of the absence of damage in the γ phase. The paper also makes a mechanistic proposal—rapid disorder recovery enabled by lattice configurational degeneracy—that is falsifiable and opens a new direction for radiation-tolerant materials. The simulations are reproducible in principle (LAMMPS, TREKIS-3, abTEM, and the tabGAP potential are publicly available). However, the mechanistic explanation relies on several modelling choices whose validation is incomplete, and the room-temperature recovery is an extrapolation from high-temperature annealing simulations with substantial uncertainty.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (MD simulation cell); SI 4.2] The γ-Ga2O3 simulation cell is constructed by displacing Ga atoms by 6 Å in random directions and relaxing (Methods, 'To capture the random order...'). This is an ad hoc representation of the defective spinel structure; no validation is provided against experimental structural data (e.g., cation site occupancies, pair distribution functions, or diffraction). The central claim that γ-Ga2O3 rapidly recovers because of 'multiple configurations' is therefore only as credible as this constructed cell. Please validate the model against available structural characterizations of γ-Ga2O3, or at least show that the recovery behavior is robust to different ways of generating the disordered starting structure.
  2. [SI 4.1.1.2; Fig. S10] The nonthermal energy transfer time is set to 60 fs 'because the best agreement with the experimental tracks is achieved' at that value. This parameter controls the initial energy deposition and, consequently, the initial amorphous track size in both phases. Thus the MD prediction that both β and γ initially form amorphous tracks (Fig. 3) is not parameter-free; if the true transfer time were substantially different, γ might not amorphize at all, in which case the 'erasure' mechanism would not be needed to explain the absence of tracks. The paper should demonstrate robustness of the γ recovery conclusion to a range of physically motivated transfer times, not only the 60 fs case and the 5 fs case in Fig. S14, which are both within the same model.
  3. [SI 4.2.2; Fig. S13] The room-temperature recovery is extrapolated from 1000–1250 K annealing runs via an Arrhenius fit. The SI itself states that annealing 'sacrifices the exact time dependence of the studied process and may alter the order in which events occur' and that the analysis 'does not include the Ga-sublattice, which is known to be stable at room temperature.' Although the 95% confidence intervals for the 300 K half-lives (γ: [0.4, 2530] s; β: [7.8, 1740] s) are shorter than typical times between irradiation and imaging, the extrapolation assumes the same O-sublattice mechanism dominates at 300 K. If Ga-sublattice disorder or a different low-temperature pathway pins the amorphous region, the proposed recovery mechanism would fail even though the no-track observation itself would stand. This point is load-bearing for the paper's mechanistic conclusion and should be addressed either by direct low-te
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption refers to 'upper-lying γ-phase part' and 'lower-lying β-Ga2O3'; adding a schematic of the layer stack in the figure or noting the irradiation geometry would help the reader.
  2. [Fig. 2] The symbol kirr/k0 is used without explicit definition in the main text; it is defined indirectly in the caption. Please define it at first use.
  3. [Methods] The phrase 'displaced by 6 Å in a random direction' is ambiguous: 6 Å is large compared to Ga–O bond lengths. Clarify whether this is a uniform displacement magnitude for all Ga atoms and how this relates to the actual partial occupancies in γ-Ga2O3.
  4. [SI 4.2.1] The energy deposition method assigns velocities with a random direction but a magnitude vkick = (2ΔK/mi)^1/2; the text notes the actual kinetic-energy change differs by a cross term. This is acceptable statistically, but a sentence summarizing the average energy conservation would improve clarity.
  5. [Abstract/Conclusions] The phrase 'amazingly fast disorder recovery' is informal; consider 'remarkably fast' or quantitative wording for a journal style.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

One fitted parameter (60 fs energy-transfer time) calibrates the model to beta-Ga2O3 tracks, so the beta-track 'prediction' is partly circular; the central gamma no-track claim remains independently supported by MD annealing and the 5 fs control.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary note 4, SI-4.1.1.2 'Energy transfer to the lattice'; applied in main-text Fig. 3/Fig. 4 back-loop STEM comparison]
    "However, there is an ambiguity in the time instant at which the energy should be delivered to atoms, since the spatial distribution is evolving in time (see Fig.S10). In the case of Ga2O3, the best agreement with the experimental tracks is achieved when energy is transferred at 60 fs after the SHI passage."

    The 60 fs nonthermal energy-transfer time is not derived from first principles; it is explicitly tuned to reproduce the experimental ion-track images. The MD configurations generated with this calibrated input are then used in the back-loop STEM simulation (Fig. 4 and SI note 5), and the resulting match with experimental STEM images is presented as validation of the multiscale model. Thus the beta-Ga2O3 track prediction is statistically forced by the calibration rather than independent. This does not by itself invalidate the gamma-Ga2O3 no-track conclusion, because the gamma recovery is demonstrated in MD and is robust to the 5 fs energy-deposition control (SI 4.2.3), which still recovers the O-sublattice.

full rationale

The central empirical claim—that SHIs leave no tracks in gamma-Ga2O3—is an independent STEM/thermal-conductivity observation, not an output of the simulation. The recovery explanation is supported by MD annealing of the O-sublattice at 1000–1250 K with an Arrhenius extrapolation to 300 K; this is an extrapolation with wide confidence intervals and known limitations (the SI concedes it 'sacrifices the exact time dependence' and omits the Ga-sublattice), but it is not circular because the MD results were not fitted to the no-track observation. The main circularity-adjacent element is the 60 fs energy-transfer time, which is explicitly calibrated to experimental tracks and then used in the beta-phase validation; however, the gamma-phase conclusion is insensitive to this choice (the 5 fs test still shows recovery), so the central derivation is not reduced to its inputs. Self-citations (tabGAP potential, TREKIS-3, prior Ga2O3 polymorph work) are code/potential and prior experimental support external to the target observation and do not constitute load-bearing circularity. Overall this is a minor-to-moderate partial calibration issue, not a fundamental circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several assumptions: the fidelity of the machine-learning interatomic potential, the validity of using high-temperature annealing to model room-temperature recovery, the correctness of the TREKIS-3 energy deposition model, and the representativeness of the artificially constructed gamma cell. The 60 fs energy transfer time and the Arrhenius parameters are fitted or tuned, so they are counted as free parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • Nonthermal energy transfer time (t_nt) = 60 fs
    TREKIS-3 radial energy deposition is converted to atomic kinetic energy at a fixed time after ion passage; 60 fs gives best agreement with experimental track sizes (SI 4.1.1.2).
  • O-sublattice recovery Arrhenius parameters (E_a, A) = E_a = 0.9 +/- 0.03 eV (beta), 0.87 +/- 0.048 eV (gamma); prefactor A from fit
    Fitted to MD annealing data at 1000-1250 K and extrapolated to 300 K to predict room-temperature recovery half-lives (SI 4.2.2, Fig. S13).
  • Gamma-phase simulation cell Ga displacement = 6 A random displacement
    The gamma-Ga2O3 simulation cell is built by randomly displacing Ga atoms by 6 A, then relaxing; a modeling choice that may not fully capture the real defective spinel structure (Methods).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The tabGAP machine learning potential accurately reproduces energetics and dynamics of beta and gamma Ga2O3 polymorphs.
    MD results depend entirely on this potential (ref 38), developed by co-author Zhao et al. and validated for polymorphs, but not independently reassessed here.
  • domain assumption Annealing at 1000-1250 K probes the same recovery mechanisms operating at 300 K, and the Arrhenius extrapolation is valid across this range.
    SI 4.2.2 acknowledges the approach 'sacrifices the exact time dependence' and may alter event ordering; the room-temperature half-life is obtained by extrapolating over about 1000 K.
  • domain assumption TREKIS-3 electron kinetics and nonthermal acceleration model correctly captures energy transfer to the lattice in Ga2O3.
    The MC code from co-author Medvedev is validated against SRIM and NIST for cross sections, but the nonthermal mechanism and its timescale are assumptions in the model.
  • ad hoc to paper The real gamma-Ga2O3 structure can be approximated by randomly displacing Ga atoms by 6 A and relaxing.
    Methods section: 'To capture the random order in which Ga atoms partially occupy... the Ga atoms in the gamma-phase simulation cell were displaced by 6 A in a random direction.' This is an ad hoc construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ions leaving no tracks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZGPKN7V5

@misc{pith2026250907440,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ions leaving no tracks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZGPKN7V5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07440}
}
read the original abstract

The paths of swift heavy ions are typically traceable in solids, because of confined electronic interactions along the paths, inducing what is known in literature as 'ion tracks', i.e. nano-sized in cross-section cylindrical zones of modified material extending for microns in length. Such tracks readily form in materials exhibiting low thermal conductivities, in particular insulators or semiconductors, altering the homogeneity of materials. In this work, using recently discovered gamma/beta-Ga2O3 polymorph heterostructures we show that, in contrast to the trends in many other materials, including that in beta-Ga2O3, swift heavy ions leave no tracks in gamma-Ga2O3. We explained this trend in terms of amazingly fast disorder recovery, occurring because of multiple configurations in the gamma-Ga2O3 lattice itself, so that the disorder formed by ion impacts gets rapidly erased, giving a perception of ions leaving no tracks. As such, gamma-Ga2O3, readily integrated with beta-Ga2O3 in polymorph heterostructures, may become a promising semiconductor platform for devices capable to operate in extremely harsh radiation environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07440 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) data revealing that SHIs leave no tracks in the γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Thermal conductivity data measured by the time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summary of the representative molecular dynamic (MD) modelling data for the 147 MeV Kr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results of the back-loop simulation of the microscopy data, feeding it with the atomic configurations obtained with MD. (a) – (d) pairs of atomistic maps obtained with MD and corresponding STEM images for β- Ga2O3 and γ-Ga2O3 immediately (200 ps) after irradiation with…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anisotropic Core-Shell Swift Heavy Ion Tracks in beta-Ga2O3

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulations show swift heavy ion tracks in beta-Ga2O3 form anisotropic core-shell structures, where recrystallization along [010] is strongest due to high elastic stiffness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Trautmann, C

    Lang, M., Djurabekova, F., Medvedev, N., Toulemonde, M. & Trautmann, C. Fundamental Phenomena and Applications of Swift Heavy Ion Irradiations. in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials: Second Edition (2020). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11644-3

    doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803581-8.11644-3 2020

  2. [2]

    M., Khakshouri, S

    Itoh, N., Duffy, D. M., Khakshouri, S. & Stoneham, A. M. Making tracks: Electronic excitation roles in forming swift heavy ion tracks. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 21, (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    & Rettenmayr , M

    Kamarou, A., Wesch, W., Wendler, E., Undisz, A. & Rettenmayr , M. Radiation damage formation in InP, InSb, GaAs, GaP, Ge, and Si due to fast ions. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 78, (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Amekura, H. et al. Latent ion tracks were finally observed in diamond. Nat Commun 15, (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Sattonnay, G. et al. Phenomenological model for the formation of heterogeneous tracks in pyrochlores irradiated with swift heavy ions. Acta Mater 60, (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    & Trautmann, C

    Lang, M., Devanathan, R., Toulemonde, M. & Trautmann, C. Advances in understanding of swift heavy -ion tracks in complex ceramics. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science vol. 19 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2014.10.002 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2014.10.002 2014

  7. [7]

    Lacroix, B., Gaboriaud, R. J. & Paumier, F. Fundamental aspects about the first steps of irradiation-induced phase transformations in fluorite -related oxides. Acta Mater 153, (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    E., Pécz, B., Pászti, F

    Szenes, G., Horváth, Z. E., Pécz, B., Pászti, F. & Tóth, L. Tracks induced by swift heavy ions in semiconductors. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 65, (2002)

    work page 2002

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Rymzhanov, R. A. et al. Recrystallization as the governing mechanism of ion track formation. Sci Rep 9, (2019). 12

    2019

  2. [10]

    Pearton, S. J. et al. A review of Ga2O3 materials, processing, and devices. Applied Physics Reviews vol. 5 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006941 (2018)

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Tadjer, M. J. Toward gallium oxide power electronics Ultrawide -bandgap semiconductors show promise for high-power transistors. Science (1979) 378, (2022)

    1979

  4. [12]

    & Nishinaka, H

    Biswas, M. & Nishinaka, H. Thermodynamically metastable α -, ϵ - -), κand -Ga2γO3: From material growth to device applications. APL Mater 10, (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Swallow, J. E. N. et al. Influence of Polymorphism on the Electronic Structure of Ga2O3. Chemistry of Materials 32, (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Mazzolini, P. et al. Silane-Mediated Expansion of Domains in Si-Doped κ-Ga2O3 Epitaxy and its Impact on the In-Plane Electronic Conduction. Adv Funct Mater 33, (2023)

    2023

  7. [16]

    Azarov, A. et al. Disorder-Induced Ordering in Gallium Oxide Polymorphs. Phys Rev Lett 128, (2022)

    2022

  8. [18]

    Yoo, T. et al. Atomic-scale characterization of structural damage and recovery in Sn ion - implanted β-Ga2O3. Appl Phys Lett 121, (2022)

    2022

  9. [19]

    Huang, H. L. et al. Atomic scale defect formation and phase transformation in Si implanted β-Ga2O3. APL Mater 11, (2023)

    2023

  10. [20]

    Azarov, A. et al. Phase glides and self -organization of atomically abrupt interfaces out of stochastic disorder in α-Ga2O3. Nat Commun 16, 3245 (2025)

    2025

  11. [21]

    Abdullaev, A. et al. Thermal conductivity of double polymorph Ga2O3 structures. APL Mater 12, 081108 (2024)

    2024

  12. [22]

    Azarov, A. et al. Self-Assembling of Multilayered Polymorphs with Ion Beams. Nano Lett 25, 1637–1643 (2025)

    2025

  13. [23]

    Polyakov, A. Y. et al. Proton damage effects in double polymorph γ/β -Ga2O3 diodes. J Mater Chem C Mater 12, (2023)

    2023

  14. [24]

    Sequeira, M. C. et al. Unravelling the secrets of the resistance of GaN to strongly ionising radiation. Commun Phys 4, 51 (2021)

    2021

  15. [25]

    Leino, A. A. et al. Structural analysis of simulated swift heavy ion tracks in quartz. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 326, 289–292 (2014)

    2014

  16. [26]

    Huang, Q.-S. et al. Nature of Disordering in γ-Ga2O3. Phys Rev Lett 133, 226101 (2024). 13

    2024

  17. [27]

    A., Varley, J

    Lee, C., Scarpulla, M. A., Varley, J. B. & Ertekin, E. Unraveling the transformation pathway of the β to γ phase transition in Ga2O3 from atomistic simulations. Phys Rev Mater 9, 14601 (2025)

    2025

  18. [28]

    Abdullaev, A. et al. Depth-resolved thermal conductivity and damage in swift heavy ion irradiated metal oxides. Journal of Nuclear Materials 561, (2022)

    2022

  19. [29]

    Ai, W. et al. Radiation damage in β-Ga2O3 induced by swift heavy ions. Jpn J Appl Phys 58, (2019)

    2019

  20. [30]

    & Susi, T

    Madsen, J. & Susi, T. The abTEM code: transmission electron microscopy from first principles. Open Research Europe 1, (2021)

    2021

  21. [31]

    & Van Dyck, D

    Lobato, I. & Van Dyck, D. An accurate parameterization for scattering factors, electron densities and electrostatic potentials for neutral atoms that obey all physical constraints. Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv 70, (2014)

    2014

  22. [32]

    Kurbanova, B. et al. Multiscale phonon thermal transport in nano-porous silicon. Appl Phys Lett 124, 252202 (2024)

    2024

  23. [33]

    & Yang, R

    Jiang, P., Qian, X. & Yang, R. Tutorial: Time -domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) for thermal property characterization of bulk and thin film materials. Journal of Applied Physics vol. 124 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046944 (2018)

    2018 doi

  24. [35]

    J., Cheaito, R

    Schmidt, A. J., Cheaito, R. & Chiesa, M. A frequency -domain thermoreflectance method for the characterization of thermal properties. Review of Scientific Instruments 80, (2009)

    2009

  25. [36]

    F., Chauhan, V

    Riyad, M. F., Chauhan, V. & Khafizov, M. Implementation of a multilayer model for measurement of thermal conductivity in ion beam irradiated samples using a modulated thermoreflectance approach. Journal of Nuclear Materials 509, 134–144 (2018)

    2018

  26. [37]

    Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle -based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun 271, (2022)

    2022

  27. [38]

    Zhao, J. et al. Complex Ga2O3 polymorphs explored by accurate and general -purpose machine-learning interatomic potentials. NPJ Comput Mater 9, (2023)

    2023

  28. [39]

    A., Rymzhanov, R

    Medvedev, N. A., Rymzhanov, R. A. & Volkov, A. E. Time -resolved electron kinetics in swift heavy ion irradiated solids. J Phys D Appl Phys 48, (2015)

    2015

  29. [40]

    Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO -the Open Visualization Tool

    Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO -the Open Visualization Tool. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng 18, (2010). 14

    2010

  30. [41]

    M., Schmidt, Sø

    Larsen, P. M., Schmidt, Sø. & SchiØtz, J. Robust structural identification via polyhedral template matching. Model Simul Mat Sci Eng 24, (2016). Acknowledgements M-ERA.NET Program is acknowledged for financial support via the GOFIB project (administrated by the Research Counci...

    2016

  31. [42]

    Azarov, A. et al. Universal radiation tolerant semiconductor. Nat Commun 14, 4855 (2023)

    2023

  32. [43]

    Zhao, J. et al. Crystallization Instead of Amorphization in Collision Cascades in Gallium Oxide. Phys Rev Lett 134, 126101 (2025)

    2025

  33. [44]

    F., Ziegler, M

    Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. S. R. I. M. The stopping and range of ions in matter. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 268, 1818–1823 (2010)

    2010

  34. [45]

    Cahill, D. G. Analysis of heat flow in layered structures for time -domain thermoreflectance. Review of Scientific Instruments (2004) doi:10.1063/1.1819431

    2004 doi

  35. [46]

    X., & Yang, R

    Jiang, P., Qian, X., Li. X., & Yang, R. Three-dimensional anisotropic thermal conductivity tensor of single crystalline β-Ga2O3. Appl Phys Lett 113, 232105 (2018)

    2018

  36. [47]

    & Volkov, A

    Medvedev, N., Rymzhanov, R. & Volkov, A. TREKIS -3. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12704728 (2024)

    2024 doi

  37. [48]

    Rymzhanov, R. A. et al. Insights into different stages of formation of swift heavy ion tracks. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 473, 27–42 (2020)

    2020

  38. [49]

    Medvedev, N. et al. Frontiers, challenges, and solutions in modeling of swift heavy ion effects in materials. J Appl Phys 133, (2023)

    2023

  39. [50]

    & Volkov, A

    Medvedev, N., Rymzhanov, R. & Volkov, A. Corrigendum: Time -resolved electron kinetics in swift heavy ion irradiated solids (2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48 355303). Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics vol. 49 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1088/0022 -3727/49/36/369501 (2016)

    2015 doi

  40. [51]

    & Barak, J

    Akkerman, A., Murat, M. & Barak, J. Delta -electron spectra, inelastic cross sections, and stopping powers of ions in silicon: Comparison between different models. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 321, 1–7 (2014)

    2014

  41. [52]

    & Bouffard, S

    Gervais, B. & Bouffard, S. Simulation of the primary stage of the interaction of swift heavy ions with condensed matter. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 88, 355–364 (1994)

    1994

  42. [53]

    A., Rymzhanov, R

    Medvedev, N. A., Rymzhanov, R. A. & Volkov, A. E. Complex dielectric function formalism for description of the electron kinetics in swift heavy ion tracks in LiF and Y2O3. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 315, 85–89 (2013)

    2013

  43. [54]

    Solid State Physics. Von N. W. Ashcroft und N. D. Mermin; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1976, XXII, 826 Seiten. Physik in unserer Zeit 9, 33 (1978)

    1976

  44. [55]

    Brown, G. E. Elementary excitations in solids: David Pines (W.A. Benjamin, New York,

  45. [57]

    A., Voronkov, R

    Medvedev, N., Akhmetov, F., Rymzhanov, R. A., Voronkov, R. & Volkov, A. E. Modeling Time-Resolved Kinetics in Solids Induced by Extreme Electronic Excitation. Adv Theory Simul 5, (2022)

    2022

  46. [58]

    Guo, Z. et al. Anisotropic thermal conductivity in single crystal β-gallium oxide. Appl Phys Lett 106, (2015)

    2015

  47. [59]

    & Zhou, X

    Liu, Q., Chen, Z. & Zhou, X. Electronic, Thermal, and Thermoelectric Transport Properties of ϵ-Ga2O3from First Principles. ACS Omega 7, 11643–11653 (2022)

    2022

  48. [60]

    K., Berhanuddin, D

    Ping, L. K., Berhanuddin, D. D., Mondal, A. K., Menon, P. S. & Mohamed, M. A. Properties and perspectives of ultrawide bandgap Ga2O3 in optoelectronic applications. Chinese Journal of Physics vol. 73 195–212 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2021.06.015 (2021)

    2021 doi

  49. [61]

    Preprint at https://materials.springer.com/isp/crystallographic/docs/sd_1638491

    γ-Ga2O3 (Ga2.67O4 m) Crystal Structure: Datasheet from ``PAULING FILE Multinaries Edition – 2022’’ in SpringerMaterials (https://materials.springer.com/isp/crystallographic/docs/sd_1638491). Preprint at https://materials.springer.com/isp/crystallographic/docs/sd_1638491

    2022

  50. [62]

    & Ohtomo, A

    Oshima, T., Nakazono, T., Mukai, A. & Ohtomo, A. Epitaxial growth of γ -Ga 2O 3 films by mist chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth 359, 60–63 (2012)

    2012

  51. [63]

    & Jia, R

    Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Dong, L. & Jia, R. First-principles calculations of electronic and optical properties of aluminum-doped β-Ga2O3 with intrinsic defects. Results Phys 7, 1582–1589 (2017)

    2017

  52. [64]

    Ding, J. et al. Electronic transport and optical properties of five different phases (α, β, ε, δ and γ) of Ga2O3: A first-principles study. Physica B Condens Matter 682, (2024)

    2024

  53. [65]

    Cullen, D. E. Nuclear Data Services DOCUMENTATION SERIES OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR DATA SECTION EPICS2023. Preprint at (2023)

    2023

  54. [66]

    & Reggiani, L

    Jacoboni, C. & Reggiani, L. The Monte Carlo method for the solution of charge transport in semiconductors with applications to covalent materials. Rev. Mod. Phys 55, 645–705 (1983)

    1983

  55. [67]

    & Volkov, A

    Medvedev, N., Rymzhanov, R. & Volkov, A. Corrigendum: Time -resolved electron kinetics in swift heavy ion irradiated solids (2015 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 48 355303, (2016)

    2015

  56. [68]

    & Mäkinen, V

    Koskinen, P. & Mäkinen, V. Density-functional tight-binding for beginners. Comput Mater Sci 47, 237–253 (2009)

    2009

  57. [69]

    A., Gorbunov, S

    Rymzhanov, R. A., Gorbunov, S. A., Medvedev, N. & Volkov, A. E. Damage along swift heavy ion trajectory. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 440, 25–35 (2019)

    2019

  58. [70]

    A., Medvedev, N

    Rymzhanov, R. A., Medvedev, N. & Volkov, A. E. Damage threshold and structure of swift heavy ion tracks in Al2O3. J Phys D Appl Phys 50, (2017). 36

    2017

  59. [71]

    Biersack J. P. and Ziegler, J. F. The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids. in Ion Implantation Techniques (ed. Ryssel Heiner and Glawischnig, H.) 122 –156 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-68779-2_5

    1982 doi

  60. [72]

    & Jablonski, A

    Powell, C. & Jablonski, A. NIST Electron Inelastic-Mean-Free-Path Database 71, Version 1.0. Preprint at (1999)

    1999

  61. [73]

    & Volkov, A

    Medvedev, N. & Volkov, A. E. Nonthermal acceleration of atoms as a mechanism of fast lattice heating in ion tracks. J Appl Phys 131, 225903 (2022)

    2022

  62. [74]

    N., Rymzhanov, R

    Terekhin, P. N., Rymzhanov, R. A., Gorbunov, S. A., Medvedev, N. A. & Volkov, A. E. Effect of valence holes on swift heavy ion track formation in Al2O3. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 354, 200–204 (2015)

    2015

  63. [75]

    A., Volkov, A

    Medvedev, N. A., Volkov, A. E., Schwartz, K. & Trautmann, C. Effect of spatial redistribution of valence holes on the formation of a defect halo of swift heavy -ion tracks in LiF. Phys Rev B 87, 104103 (2013)

    2013

  64. [76]

    A., Medvedev, N

    Rymzhanov, R. A., Medvedev, N. A. & Volkov, A. E. Effect of valence holes kinetics on material excitation in tracks of swift heavy ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 365, 462–467 (2015)

    2015

  65. [77]

    Galeckas, A. et al. Optical Library of Ga2O3 Polymorphs . (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.13987

    2024 doi arXiv

  66. [78]

    Wang, L.-P. et al. Discovering chemistry with an ab initio nanoreactor. Nat Chem 6, 1044– 1048 (2014)

    2014

  67. [79]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Targeting Superionic Conductivity by Turning on Anion Rotation at Room Temperature in Fast Ion Conductors. Matter 2, 1667–1684 (2020)

    2020

  68. [80]

    P., Shim, Y., Amar, J

    Perez, D., Uberuaga, B. P., Shim, Y., Amar, J. G. & Voter, A. F. Chapter 4 Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Methods: Introduction and Recent Developments. in Annual Reports in Computational Chemistry (ed. Wheeler, R. A.) vol. 5 79–98 (Elsevier, 2009)

    2009

  69. [81]

    & Naldoni, A

    Allieta, M., Coduri, M. & Naldoni, A. Black TiO2 and Oxygen Vacancies: Unraveling the Role in the Thermal Anatase-to-Rutile Transformation. Applied Nano 5, 72–83 (2024)

    2024

  70. [82]

    Humphreys, F. J. & Hatherly, M. Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena . (Elsevier, 2012)

    2012

  71. [83]

    W., De Paula, J

    Atkins, P. W., De Paula, J. & Keeler, J. Atkins’ Physical Chemistry . (Oxford university press, 2023)

    2023

  72. [84]

    K., Nehate, S

    Saikumar, A. K., Nehate, S. D. & Sundaram, K. B. RF sputtered films of Ga2O3. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 8, Q3064 (2019)

    2019

  73. [1963]

    9.00 clothbound, 5.95 paperbound)

    xii-299 p. 9.00 clothbound, 5.95 paperbound). Nuclear Physics 52, 695 (1964). 35

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.