Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Two-legged approximation for building non-empirical hybrids and analyzing correlation at finite temperature

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper builds a finite-temperature two-legged adiabatic connection whose mixing parameter depends on density and temperature, yielding non-empirical hybrids and a correlation diagnostic.

desk verdict A sound finite-temperature extension of the two-legged AC construction, but Eq. (22) is under-specified and carries more interpretive weight than it can currently bear. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.07970 v1 pith:RD57WZWK submitted 2025-09-09 cond-mat.str-el physics.chem-ph

classification cond-mat.str-elphysics.chem-ph
keywords finite-temperaturedensityfunctionaltheoryadiabaticconnectiontwo-leggedapproximationnon-empiricalhybridsexchange-correlationfreeenergywarmdensematteruniformelectrongasHubbarddimer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the two-legged adiabatic connection construction, a zero-temperature route to non-empirical hybrid functionals, to finite temperature. It defines a mixing parameter b^τ that depends on both density and temperature, and shows for the uniform electron gas and the asymmetric Hubbard dimer that the two straight-line legs meeting at b^τ integrate to the exact exchange-correlation free energy. The authors then interpret b^τ as the fraction of correlation free energy that is kentropic, meaning kinetic minus temperature times entropy, and use that reading to show that thermal effects on the balance between exchange and correlation are nonlinear and persist even under strong electron-electron interaction. If the construction holds in practice, it offers a parameter-free way to build finite-temperature hybrid exchange-correlation approximations and a diagnostic for how static and dynamic correlation shift across warm dense matter conditions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the finite-temperature two-legged approximation (TLA) to the adiabatic connection: the exact coupling-constant integrand W^{τ,λ}_{XC} is replaced by two straight line segments that meet at the coupling strength λ = b^τ, with b^τ chosen so the area under the two legs equals the exact XC free energy. This object does double duty: it is the weight in a proposed non-empirical hybrid mixing exact exchange with a semilocal XC free energy, and its value tracks the curvature of the adiabatic connection, which the paper reads as a measure of balance between exchange and correlation, and, through Eq. (22), between kentropic and potential correlation.

What would settle it

Take the finite-temperature asymmetric Hubbard dimer at a point away from symmetric limits, e.g. τ = 0.5, Δn = 1, U = 2, compute b^τ from Eq. (21) and K^τ_C / |U^τ_C| from the exact correlation components; if the numbers differ, the claimed physical reading of b^τ is falsified, even though the TLA still integrates to the exact A^τ_XC.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the two-legged approximation of the adiabatic connection carries over to finite temperature and keeps its non-empirical character: from the finite-temperature adiabatic connection formula, one defines b^τ by Eq. (21), and the two-legged curve with legs meeting at (b^τ, W^{τ,b}) has the same integrated area as the exact exchange-correlation free energy. The paper demonstrates this exactly for the uniform electron gas at warm dense matter conditions and for the finite-temperature asymmetric Hubbard dimer, including strongly interacting regimes. It then identifies b^τ with the ratio of kentropic to potential correlation, b^τ = K^τ_C / |U^τ_C|, tur

Load-bearing premise

The paper's physical interpretation of b^τ depends on the asserted, unproved equality b^τ = K^τ_C / |U^τ_C|; the two-legged construction itself would still reproduce the exact XC free energy even if this equality were false, but the correlation-balance story would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any existing finite-temperature GGA can be turned into a hybrid whose exact-exchange fraction is determined by temperature and density, with no empirical fitting.
  • In the uniform electron gas and the asymmetric Hubbard dimer, the construction reproduces the exact XC free energy by construction, providing benchmark TLA curves for warm dense matter conditions.
  • Nonlinear temperature dependence of the exchange-correlation balance is a general feature, not a weak-correlation artifact: it appears and can be amplified at strong on-site interaction in the dimer.
  • Static versus dynamic correlation cannot be diagnosed by temperature or density alone; condition-dependent treatment is needed, which the b^τ contours quantify.
  • A thermal TLA hybrid built from a finite-temperature GGA is the natural next step, and may correct the band-gap overestimation that existing thermal hybrids inherit from their zero-temperature limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The kentropic reading of b^τ is asserted, not derived; if a direct calculation of K^τ_C / |U^τ_C| for the dimer matched Eq. (21)'s b^τ, it would upgrade b^τ into a practical finite-temperature proxy for static-versus-dynamic correlation.
  • The same two-legged geometry applied along the temperature axis, rather than the interaction axis, could yield a semilocal approximation to the XC entropy; the paper notes ongoing work in this direction but does not develop it here.
  • A hybrid built with b^τ from approximate GGAs inherits whatever errors those GGAs have in the free energy, so comparing exact and approximate b^τ for the same model would isolate how approximation errors propagate into the mixing fraction.
  • The temperature-density contours of b^τ in the dimer point to low-to-intermediate temperatures as the regime where correlation character shifts most rapidly, suggesting that this regime deserves focused experimental or simulation study in strongly coupled warm dense matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the zero-temperature two-legged adiabatic-connection (TLA) construction to finite temperature. A temperature-dependent mixing parameter b^τ is defined in Eq. (21) so that the area under a two-segment linear interpolation equals the exact exchange-correlation free energy A^τ_XC. The construction is applied to the uniform electron gas, using a parametrized XC free energy, and to the asymmetric Hubbard dimer, using exact finite-temperature many-body solutions. The resulting b^τ surfaces are presented as a function of temperature, density, and interaction strength, and are interpreted through Eq. (22) as the ratio of kentropic to potential correlation. The paper frames these results as a step toward non-empirical, temperature- and density-dependent hybrid functionals and as an analysis tool for static versus dynamic correlation in warm dense matter.

Significance. If the interpretive identity in Eq. (22) is established with proper definitions, the paper offers a parameter-free, density- and temperature-dependent mixing parameter for finite-temperature hybrids, computed from exact or well-tested adiabatic-connection endpoints rather than fitted to data. The TLA interpolation itself is internally consistent: b^τ from Eq. (21) exactly reproduces A^τ_XC by construction, and the authors acknowledge this. The b^τ surfaces for the UEG and Hubbard dimer provide a compact diagnostic of how the exchange/correlation balance shifts with temperature, density, and interaction strength, which is potentially valuable for warm dense matter functional development. The main weakness is that the central physical interpretation, Eq. (22), is asserted rather than derived, and the quantities A_X and U^τ_C are not defined.

major comments (2)
  1. [III.A, Eqs. (21)-(22)] Equation (22), b^τ = K^τ_C / |U^τ_C|, is asserted without proof, and A_X and U^τ_C are never defined. From Eq. (20), the numerator of Eq. (21) is A^τ_XC - W^{τ,1}_XC = K^τ_C = (T-T_s) - τ(S-S_s). The denominator A_X - W^{τ,1}_XC equals -U^τ_C only if A_X is the λ→0 AC integrand (potential exchange, U_X) and U^τ_C = W^{τ,1}_XC - U_X. In finite-temperature DFT, an 'exchange free energy' may include an entropic exchange contribution -τS_X; with that definition Eq. (22) is false. The subsequent kentropic-vs-potential and static-vs-dynamic analysis in Sec. III.B and the Conclusions rests on Eq. (22). The TLA construction itself is unaffected, but the advertised physical interpretation is under-specified. Please derive Eq. (22) with explicit definitions of A_X and U^τ_C, or restrict the interpretation of b^τ to a coarse curvature/mixing measure.
  2. [III.A, after Eq. (22)] At zero temperature the bound 0 < b ≤ 1/2 follows from the concavity condition in Eq. (12). No finite-temperature analogue of this bound is established. Calling b^τ a 'fraction' (e.g., 'fraction of correlation that is kentropic') presumes that b^τ lies in a meaningful range; the finite-temperature adiabatic-connection integrand is not proven concave, and b^τ from Eq. (21) could in principle fall outside [0,1/2] in some regimes. The authors should state the allowed range of b^τ and provide numerical or analytical evidence for any 'fraction' interpretation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] Typos: 'zero-tempearture' (Sec. I), 'Based on teh' (Sec. II.B), 'eraching' (Sec. II.C), 'straightfoward' (Sec. IV).
  2. [Sec. I] Placeholder citations appear as 'molecules[] and solids[]' and should be filled.
  3. [Figs. 6-7] The vertical axis labels read 'b( )'; should be b(τ). The legend in Fig. 5 ('τ 1 / τ 10') is cryptic and should clarify units or definitions.
  4. [Sec. III.B.2, Eqs. (28)-(29)] Notation is inconsistent: UXC, UXC^λ, EX, and AX are used without clear distinction. In particular, at finite temperature the statement 'the exchange energy is simply EX = -UH/2' should identify whether EX denotes the exchange free energy AX used in Eq. (21).
  5. [Abstract and Sec. III.B] Phrases saying the TLA 'yields the exact A_XC' should be softened to 'reproduces A_XC by construction,' since the equality of the integrated area is imposed by the definition of b^τ, not tested by the numerical demonstrations.
  6. [References] Several 'manuscript in preparation' items (Refs. 57, 59, 60) are cited in the conclusions; these should be marked as unpublished works or private communications so the reader can assess their status.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

TLA exactness is definitional (and acknowledged); the load-bearing Eq. (22) equality b^tau = K^tau_C / |U^tau_C| is asserted without the needed definitions, making the kentropic-vs-potential analysis rest on an unstated convention.

  1. self definitional [Section III.B, 'Numerical Demonstrations' (first paragraph)]
    "We reiterate here that, though the piecewise linear TLA curves are approximations to the adiabatic connection integrand, the integrated quantity of the AXC is given exactly by both the exact adibatic connection curve and the TLA curve in these model systems."

    The TLA leg-break b is defined in Eq. (21) precisely by enforcing area equality with A^tau_XC. Therefore the statement that the TLA integrates to exact A_XC is an identity forced by construction, not a numerical prediction. The authors explicitly mark this 'by construction,' so this is a minor definitional circularity; it does not affect the b-diagnostic, which is computed from exact ingredients rather than fitted.

  2. self definitional [Section III.A, Eq. (22) and surrounding text]
    "Incidentally, b at FT is not only a measure of the fraction of kinetic correlation to potential correlation; it is now comparing quantities that contain correlation entropy: b^tau = K^tau_C / |U^tau_C |."

    Eq. (22) is presented as an identification but is not derived. Combining Eq. (21) with A^tau_XC = A_X + K^tau_C + U^tau_C and W^{tau,1} = U_X + U_C gives b^tau = (K^tau_C + A_X - U_X) / (U_C + U_X - A_X), which reduces to K^tau_C / |U^tau_C| only if A_X = U_X, i.e. if the 'exchange free energy' is taken to contain no entropic contribution. The text instead says A_X contains exchange entropy. The paper never defines A_X or U^tau_C, so the advertised kentropic-potential interpretation is not an independent finding; it is equivalent to an unstated convention. This is load-bearing because the conclusions about kinetic/entropic/potential correlation and static/dynamic correlation all rely on Eq. (22).

full rationale

The central TLA construction is internally consistent and the b parameter is computed from exact free energies and adiabatic-connection endpoints, not fitted to a target, so the interpolation framework itself is not circular. The only true by-construction element is the exactness of the integrated TLA, which the authors acknowledge. The more serious issue is Eq. (22): the equality b^tau = K^tau_C / |U^tau_C| is asserted without proof and without defining A_X and U^tau_C, and it only holds under a specific unstated convention for the exchange free energy. Because the paper's physical analysis of kentropic versus potential correlation and its claims about static versus dynamic correlation rest on this equality, the interpretive portion of the paper is partially self-definitional. However, the TLA hybrid construction and the b-diagnostic retain independent content if Eq. (22) is replaced by a properly derived relationship, so the overall circularity is moderate rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formal construction uses no fitted parameters. However, it depends on the FTACF, on the exactness of the model inputs, and on an unproven identity for b^tau that carries the interpretive weight of the paper.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Finite-temperature adiabatic connection formula (FTACF), Eq. (10), from Refs. 36 and 37
    The entire construction assumes A_xc^tau = integral of W^{tau,lambda}_xc over lambda from 0 to 1.
  • domain assumption The exchange free energy A_x is the lambda=0 limit of the integration path
    Used implicitly in Eq. (21), where A_x appears in the denominator; standard in DFT AC formalisms.
  • ad hoc to paper b^tau = K^tau_C / |U^tau_C| as stated in Eq. (22)
    Asserted without derivation; all kentropic and static/dynamic correlation interpretations hang on this identity.
  • domain assumption The Groth et al. parametrization (Ref. 38) supplies essentially exact AC curves for the uniform electron gas
    All UEG numerics use this external parametrization, which is fitted to QMC data upstream.
  • domain assumption The asymmetric Hubbard dimer many-body solution from Ref. 55 is exact
    The dimer demonstration relies entirely on this prior exact solution, including the thermal densities and energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-legged approximation for building non-empirical hybrids and analyzing correlation at finite temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RD57WZWK

@misc{pith2026250907970,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-legged approximation for building non-empirical hybrids and analyzing correlation at finite temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RD57WZWK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.07970}
}
read the original abstract

Warm dense matter is a highly energetic phase characterized by strong correlations, thermal effects, and quantum effects of electrons. Thermal density functional theory is commonly used in simulations of this challenging phase, driving the development of temperature-dependent approximations to the exchange-correlation free energy. In this work, a finite-temperature extension of the two-legged adiabatic connection construction is demonstrated for the uniform electron gas and asymmetric Hubbard dimer at warm dense matter conditions. This provides the structure of a temperature- and density-dependent weighting scheme for a hybrid exchange-correlation approximation. The construction also provides evidence that nonlinear thermal effects on the balance between exchange and correlation, as well as that between kinetic, entropic, and potential components of the correlation, persist and can even be emphasized by strong electron-electron interaction. These findings point additionally to a complicated interplay between temperature, density, and interaction strength in the strong correlation character of these model systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07970 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    smeared-out

    Uniform Electron Gas The uniform electron gas (UEG) is an impor- tant model system in physics which places an infinite system of equally spaced electrons in a "smeared-out" background of positive charges. Studies of the UEG have led to key realizations regarding superconductivity[47], collective exci- tations from a quasiparticle perspective[ 48, 49], and ...

  2. [2]

    high- density-like

    Hubbard Dimer To go beyond the uniformity of the FT UEG, we next move to a demonstration using a non- -0.06 -0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Wxc ,λ Hartree Interaction Strength, λ rs=10, =0.1 Ha FIG. 3. Comparison of the exact FTAC (solid) and the two-legged construction (dashed) for a Wigner- Seitz radius of 10 an...

  3. [3]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. , 136(3B):B864–B871, Nov 1964

  4. [4]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Self-consistent equa- tions including exchange and correlation ef- fects. Phys. Rev. , 140(4A):A1133–A1138, Nov 1965

  5. [5]

    Gross, and Kieron Burke

    Aurora Pribram-Jones, David A. Gross, and Kieron Burke. DFT: A Theory Full of Holes? Annual Review of Physical Chemistry , 12 66(1):283–304, 2015

  6. [6]

    Axel D. Becke. Density-functional thermo- chemistry. iii. the role of exact exchange. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 98(7):5648–5652, 1993

  7. [7]

    Chengteh Lee, Weitao Yang, and Robert G. Parr. Development of the colle-salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B , 37(2):785– 789, Jan 1988

  8. [8]

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair. Accu- rate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. , 58(8):1200– 1211, 1980

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Perdew, Matthias Ernzerhof, and Kieron Burke

    John P. Perdew, Matthias Ernzerhof, and Kieron Burke. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approxima- tions. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 105(22):9982–9985, 1996

  2. [10]

    Adamo and V

    C. Adamo and V. Barone. Toward reliable den- sity functional methods without adjustable pa- rameters: The pbe0 model. Journal of Chemi- cal Physics , 110:6158, 1999

  3. [11]

    A. D. Becke. Density-functional exchange- energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A , 38(6):3098–3100, Sep 1988

  4. [12]

    Non-empirical derivation of the parameter in the b88 ex- change functional

    Peter Elliott and Kieron Burke. Non-empirical derivation of the parameter in the b88 ex- change functional. Can. J. Chem. Ecol. , 87(10):1485–1491, Oct 2009

  5. [13]

    Kieron Burke, Matthias Ernzerhof, and John P. Perdew. The adiabatic connection method: a non-empirical hybrid. Chemical Physics Let- ters, 265(1-2):115 – 120, 1997

  6. [14]

    Probing the interiors of the ice giants: Shock compression of water to 700 gpa and 3.8 g/cm 3

    Marcus D Knudson, Michael Paul Desjarlais, R W Lemke, TR Mattsson, Martin French, Na- dine Nettelmann, and R Redmer. Probing the interiors of the ice giants: Shock compression of water to 700 gpa and 3.8 g/cm 3. Physical Review Letters, 108(9):091102, 2012

  7. [15]

    A massive core in jupiter predicted from first-principles simu- lations

    B Militzer, William B Hubbard, Jan Vorberger, Isaac Tamblyn, and SA Bonev. A massive core in jupiter predicted from first-principles simu- lations. The Astrophysical Journal, 688(1):L45, 2008

  8. [16]

    Desjarlais, and Thomas R

    André Kietzmann, Ronald Redmer, Michael P. Desjarlais, and Thomas R. Mattsson. Complex behavior of fluid lithium under extreme condi- tions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:070401, Aug 2008

  9. [17]

    O. A. Hurricane, D. A. Callahan, D. T. Casey, E. L. Dewald, T. R. Dittrich, T. Döppner, S. Haan, D. E. Hinkel, L. F. Berzak Hopkins, O. Jones, A. L. Kritcher, S. Le Pape, T. Ma, A. G. MacPhee, J. L. Milovich, J. Moody, A. Pak, H.-S. Park, P. K. Patel, J. E. Ralph, H. F. Robey,...

  10. [18]

    High- precision shock wave measurements of deu- terium: Evaluation of exchange-correlation functionals at the molecular-to-atomic transi- tion

    MD Knudson and MP Desjarlais. High- precision shock wave measurements of deu- terium: Evaluation of exchange-correlation functionals at the molecular-to-atomic transi- tion. Physical Review Letters , 118(3):035501, 2017

  11. [19]

    Pulsed-power-driven high energy den- sity physics and inertial confinement fusion re- search

    M Keith Matzen, MA Sweeney, RG Adams, JR Asay, JE Bailey, GR Bennett, DE Bliss, DD Bloomquist, TA Brunner, RB e Campbell, et al. Pulsed-power-driven high energy den- sity physics and inertial confinement fusion re- search. Physics of Plasmas , 12(5), 2005

  12. [20]

    Warm dense matter demonstrating non-drude conductivity from observations of nonlinear plasmon damp- ing

    Bastian BL Witte, LB Fletcher, E Galtier, E Gamboa, HJ Lee, U Zastrau, R Redmer, SH Glenzer, and P Sperling. Warm dense matter demonstrating non-drude conductivity from observations of nonlinear plasmon damp- ing. Physical review letters , 118(22):225001, 2017

  13. [21]

    M. D. Knudson, M. P. Desjarlais, A. Becker, R. W. Lemke, K. R. Cochrane, M. E. Savage, D. E. Bliss, T. R. Mattsson, and R. Redmer. Direct observation of an abrupt insulator-to- metal transition in dense liquid deuterium. Sci- ence, 348(6242):1455–1460, Jun 2015

  14. [22]

    Rüter and Ronald Redmer

    Hannes R. Rüter and Ronald Redmer. Ab Ini- tio simulations for the ion-ion structure factor of warm dense aluminum. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112:145007, Apr 2014. 13

  15. [23]

    Desjarlais, Ronald Redmer, and Samuel B

    Frank Graziani, Michael P. Desjarlais, Ronald Redmer, and Samuel B. Trickey, editors. Fron- tiers and Challenges in Warm Dense Matter , volume 96 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering . Springer Interna- tional Publishing, 2014

  16. [24]

    M. D. Knudson and M. P. Desjarlais. Shock compression of quartz to 1.6 TPa: Redefin- ing a pressure standard. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:225501, Nov 2009

  17. [25]

    N. D. Mermin. Thermal properties of the in- homogenous electron gas. Phys. Rev. , 137:A: 1441, 1965

  18. [26]

    Density functional theory at finite temperatures

    Mario V Stoitsov and Ivan Zh Petkov. Density functional theory at finite temperatures. An- nals of Physics , 184(1):121–147, 1988

  19. [27]

    Den- sity functional theory calculations of contin- uum lowering in strongly coupled plasmas

    SM Vinko, O Ciricosta, and JS Wark. Den- sity functional theory calculations of contin- uum lowering in strongly coupled plasmas. Na- ture communications, 5(1):3533, 2014

  20. [28]

    Continuum lowering and fermi- surface rising in strongly coupled and de- generate plasmas

    SX Hu et al. Continuum lowering and fermi- surface rising in strongly coupled and de- generate plasmas. Physical review letters , 119(6):065001, 2017

  21. [29]

    Karasiev, Travis Sjostrom, James Dufty, and S

    Valentin V. Karasiev, Travis Sjostrom, James Dufty, and S. B. Trickey. Accurate homoge- neous electron gas exchange-correlation free en- ergy for local spin-density calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:076403, Feb 2014

  22. [30]

    Nonempirical semilocal free- energy density functional for matter under ex- treme conditions

    Valentin V Karasiev, James W Dufty, and SB Trickey. Nonempirical semilocal free- energy density functional for matter under ex- treme conditions. Physical Review Letters , 120(7):076401, 2018

  23. [31]

    Karasiev, D

    Valentin V. Karasiev, D. I. Mihaylov, and S. X. Hu. Meta-gga exchange-correlation free energy density functional to increase the accuracy of warm dense matter simulations. Phys. Rev. B , 105:L081109, Feb 2022

  24. [32]

    Thermal hybrid exchange-correlation density functional for improving the description of warm dense matter

    DI Mihaylov, VV Karasiev, and SX Hu. Thermal hybrid exchange-correlation density functional for improving the description of warm dense matter. Physical Review B , 101(24):245141, 2020

  25. [33]

    The abc of dft

    Kieron Burke and friends. The abc of dft. In preparation

  26. [34]

    Harris and R.O

    J. Harris and R.O. Jones. The surface energy of a bounded electron gas. J. Phys. F , 4:1170, 1974

  27. [35]

    Langreth and J.P

    D.C. Langreth and J.P. Perdew. The exchange- correlation energy of a metallic surface. Solid State Commun. , 17:1425, 1975

  28. [36]

    Gunnarsson and B.I

    O. Gunnarsson and B.I. Lundqvist. Exchange and correlation in atoms, molecules, and solids by the spin-density-functional formalism. Phys. Rev. B , 13:4274, 1976

  29. [37]

    Levy and J.P

    M. Levy and J.P. Perdew. Hellmann-Feynman, virial, and scaling requisites for the exact uni- versal density functionals. shape of the corre- lation potential and diamagnetic susceptibility for atoms. Phys. Rev. A , 32:2010, 1985

  30. [38]

    Pittalis, C

    S. Pittalis, C. R. Proetto, A. Floris, A. Sanna, C. Bersier, K. Burke, and E. K. U. Gross. Exact conditions in finite-temperature density- functional theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:163001, Oct 2011

  31. [39]

    Gross, and Kieron Burke

    Aurora Pribram-Jones, Stefano Pittalis, E.K.U. Gross, and Kieron Burke. Thermal density functional theory in context. In Frank Graziani, Michael P. Desjarlais, Ronald Redmer, and Samuel B. Trickey, editors, Frontiers and Challenges in Warm Dense Matter, volume 96 of Lecture No...

  32. [40]

    Malone, W

    Simon Groth, Tobias Dornheim, Travis Sjostrom, Fionn D. Malone, W. M. C. Foulkes, and Michael Bonitz. Ab initio exchange- correlation free energy of the uniform electron gas at warm dense matter conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:135001, Sep 2017

  33. [41]

    Approximate bounds and temperature dependence of adiabatic connec- tion integrands for the uniform electron gas

    Brittany P Harding, Zachary Mauri, and Au- rora Pribram-Jones. Approximate bounds and temperature dependence of adiabatic connec- tion integrands for the uniform electron gas. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 156(13), 2022

  34. [42]

    The adiabatic connection formalism in dft–theory and practice, 2024

    Elias Polak, Kimberly J Daas, and Stefan Vuckovic. The adiabatic connection formalism in dft–theory and practice, 2024

  35. [43]

    J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D.J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gra- dient approximation for exchange and correla- tion. Phys. Rev. B , 46:6671, 1992

  36. [44]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Yue Wang

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Yue Wang. Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system. Phys. Rev. B, 54(23):16533–16539, Dec

  37. [45]

    Gross, and Kieron Burke

    Aurora Pribram-Jones, Stefano Pittalis, E.K.U. Gross, and Kieron Burke. Thermal density functional theory in context. to appear in Computational Challenges in Warm Dense Matter, edited by F. Graziani, et al. (Springer), 2013

  38. [46]

    B. G. Johnson, P. M. W. Gill, and J. A. Pople. J. Chem. Phys. , 98:5612, 1993

  39. [47]

    V. Barone. Inclusion of hartree-fock exchange in the density functional approach. benchmark 14 computations for diatomic molecules contain- ing h, b, c, n, o, f atoms. Chem. Phys. Lett. , 226:392, 1994

  40. [48]

    A collective de- scription of electron interactions: Ii

    David Pines and David Bohm. A collective de- scription of electron interactions: Ii. collective vs individual particle aspects of the interac- tions. Physical Review, 85(2):338, 1952

  41. [49]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka. Quantum the- ory of many-particle systems . McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1971

  42. [50]

    Theory of super- conductivity

    John Bardeen, Leon N Cooper, and John Robert Schrieffer. Theory of super- conductivity. Physical review , 108(5):1175, 1957

  43. [51]

    Lan- dau Fermi-liquid theory: concepts and applica- tions

    Gordon Baym and Christopher Pethick. Lan- dau Fermi-liquid theory: concepts and applica- tions. John Wiley & Sons, 2008

  44. [52]

    A collective de- scription of electron interactions: Iii

    David Bohm and David Pines. A collective de- scription of electron interactions: Iii. coulomb interactions in a degenerate electron gas. Phys- ical Review, 92(3):609, 1953

  45. [53]

    Quan- tum theory of the electron liquid

    Gabriele Giuliani and Giovanni Vignale. Quan- tum theory of the electron liquid . Cambridge university press, 2008

  46. [54]

    Smith, Francisca Sagredo, and Kieron Burke

    Justin C. Smith, Francisca Sagredo, and Kieron Burke. Warming Up Density Functional Theory. Springer, Singapore, Nov 2017

  47. [55]

    The hubbard dimer: a den- sity functional case study of a many-body prob- lem

    DJ Carrascal, Jaime Ferrer, Justin C Smith, and Kieron Burke. The hubbard dimer: a den- sity functional case study of a many-body prob- lem. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 27(39):393001, 2015

  48. [56]

    J. C. Smith, A. Pribram-Jones, and K. Burke. Exact thermal density functional theory for a model system: Correlation components and accuracy of the zero-temperature exchange- correlation approximation. Phys. Rev. B , 93:245131, Jun 2016

  49. [57]

    Hard- ing, and Aurora Pribram-Jones

    Brianna Aguilar-Solis, Brittany P. Hard- ing, and Aurora Pribram-Jones. Exchange- correlation temperature dependence via a gtac- based lda-like approximation. Manuscript in preparation

  50. [58]

    Con- firmation of the pplb derivative discontinuity: Exact chemical potential at finite temperatures of a model system

    Francisca Sagredo and Kieron Burke. Con- firmation of the pplb derivative discontinuity: Exact chemical potential at finite temperatures of a model system. Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation , 16(12):7225–7231, 2020. PMID: 33237784

  51. [59]

    Generalized gradient ap- proximation made thermal

    John Kozlowski, Dennis Perchak, and Kieron Burke. Generalized gradient ap- proximation made thermal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03319, 2023

  52. [60]

    Harding, Anthony R

    Brittany P. Harding, Anthony R. Osborne, and Aurora Pribram-Jones. Finite-temperature generalized kohn-sham and remainder poten- tials. Manuscript in preparation

  53. [61]

    Liu and K

    Z.-F. Liu and K. Burke. Adiabatic connec- tion for strictly correlated electrons. J. Chem. Phys., 131(12):124124, 2009

  54. [62]

    The finite-temperature upside- down adiabatic connection

    Vincent Martinetto, Juri Grossi, and Aurora Pribram-Jones. The finite-temperature upside- down adiabatic connection. Manuscript in preparation

  55. [1996]

    57, 14999(E) (1998)

    ibid. 57, 14999(E) (1998)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.