Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The paper argues that lunar far-side radio arrays, with roughly 10^12 dark-ages 21-cm modes, could measure cosmological parameters a thousand times more precisely than the CMB or galaxy surveys, enough to test inflation at the percent level

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 21:19 UTC pith:6D44IXFM

load-bearing objection Readable, overconfident vision essay: the lunar cosmology case is real and worth refereeing, but the f_NL~0.01 promise skips the sensitivity calculation and the 10^6-dipole count is one to two orders of magnitude low. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.08066 v1 pith:6D44IXFM submitted 2025-09-09 astro-ph.CO

The limits of cosmology

Joseph Silk This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lunar telescopescosmic dark ages21-cm cosmologyprimordial non-Gaussianityinflationlunar far-side radio arrayexoplanet interferometrycosmological precision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Modern cosmology is close to the limit of what can be learned from the cosmic microwave background and galaxy surveys, and the paper argues the next leap requires telescopes on the far side of the Moon. Its central case is quantitative: the dark-ages 21-cm hydrogen signal provides up to 10^12 independent modes, roughly a thousand times the information content of the CMB or large-scale structure, which would push measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity to the percent level and finally give inflation a robust observational test. The paper also argues the Moon is uniquely suited for other guaranteed science, including CMB spectral distortions, decihertz gravitational waves, and direct imaging of nearby Earth-like exoplanets. A sympathetic reader would care because these are questions — how the Universe began and whether we are alone — that current or planned ground- and space-based facilities are unlikely to settle.

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that the far side of the Moon, shielded from terrestrial radio interference and free of the ionosphere and atmosphere, is the only platform that can open the next frontier of cosmology: the cosmic dark ages. Detection of the 21-cm monopole absorption signal at z roughly 30 to 100 is the first step; the real prize is the fluctuation field, which contains about 10^12 observable modes. With that mode count, the paper argues, cosmological parameter precision improves by a factor of about a thousand over the CMB or galaxy surveys, and the amplitude of primordial non-Gaussianity, f_NL, can be measured at the percent level, reaching the minimal value around 0.01 predicted

What carries the argument

The central object is the redshifted 21-cm line from neutral hydrogen during the cosmic dark ages (z about 30 to 100), whose brightness-temperature fluctuations map the primordial density field at scales far smaller than the CMB damping tail. The carrying argument is the mode count: about 10^12 independent Fourier modes, set by the number of roughly 10^6 solar-mass hydrogen clouds that are the building blocks of galaxies, gives a statistical floor of order 1/sqrt(N), about a thousand times better than the CMB's roughly 10^6 modes or galaxy surveys' roughly 10^9 modes. The load-bearing theoretical target is the single-field inflation prediction f_NL roughly equal to -(5/12)(n_s - 1), about 0.

Load-bearing premise

The lunar far side must be radio-quiet enough, and regolith scattering and low-frequency foregrounds understood well enough, for the mK-level dark-ages 21-cm signal to be extracted; the paper itself flags this as the key uncertainty.

What would settle it

A dark-ages 21-cm measurement reaching sigma(f_NL) of about 0.01 that returns f_NL consistent with zero at 95% confidence would falsify the specific single-field slow-roll prediction the paper relies on. Alternatively, a far-side radio measurement showing foreground or regolith contamination an order of magnitude above assumed levels would falsify the feasibility claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A lunar far-side 21-cm array would lower cosmological parameter errors by roughly a factor of 10^3 relative to CMB and galaxy-survey limits.
  • Primordial non-Gaussianity becomes a precision observable: f_NL around 0.01 becomes detectable in principle, giving inflation its first generic observational test rather than relying on a lucky tensor-mode detection.
  • The history of CMB experiments repeats: a monopole detection comes first, then fluctuation mapping, then precision cosmology; lunar dark-ages observations follow the same staged path.
  • The same far-side infrastructure also covers CMB spectral distortions, decihertz gravitational-wave astronomy, and microarcsecond imaging of nearby exoplanets, so the science return is not single-shot.
  • Because the dark-ages 21-cm field extends to wavenumbers of order 250 Mpc^-1, the smallest scales probed approach the precursors of roughly 10^5 solar-mass hydrogen clouds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A corollary the author leaves implicit: if 10^12 modes are real, the same data set also constrains the small-scale primordial power spectrum, dark-matter microphysics, and any process that injects energy into the intergalactic medium, not just f_NL.
  • The mode-count argument suggests a cost-effectiveness ranking: a relatively cheap far-side dipole array has, per dollar, vastly more guaranteed cosmological information than much larger free-flying or ground-based facilities whose signals may not exist; this is an argument the paper gestures at but does not make explicit.
  • Testable extension: the near-term pilot missions' measurement of regolith radio scattering and the foreground spectral index can be plugged directly into the Fisher forecasts; if those two numbers come out worse than assumed, the 10^12-mode reach is reduced in a quantifiable way.
  • The logic also points to a coordination problem the paper raises but does not solve: preserving lunar far-side radio quiet and dark polar craters from human and commercial activity is a prerequisite for every science case, so site allocation is itself a scientific decision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This is a forward-looking review/perspective paper arguing that the Moon is the only platform for the next generation of telescopes that can push cosmology beyond current limits. The scientific core is the dark ages 21-cm program: after a monopole detection, a lunar far-side interferometer would map ~10^12 Fourier modes and thereby achieve roughly 10^3 times the cosmological parameter precision of the CMB or galaxy surveys, reaching f_NL ~ 0.01 and thus probing the single-field consistency relation of inflation. The paper also advocates lunar CMB spectral-distortion measurements, lunar gravitational-wave detectors, and lunar optical interferometers for imaging nearby exoplanets, and it discusses mission concepts, costs, and the need for site protection. The central quantitative assertions are presented as 'in principle' capabilities, but the paper also uses stronger language, calling the science return 'guaranteed.'

Significance. If the dark-ages 21-cm forecasts are right, the lunar far side would open a genuinely new window: percent-level f_NL would test single-field inflation, and 21-cm dark-ages maps would probe the primordial power spectrum on scales inaccessible to the CMB. The paper has the strength of assembling the concrete experimental landscape — LuSEE-Night, PRATUSH, Hongmeng, FARSIDE, ALO, LARAF, FarView, LCRT, MoonLITE, AeSI, LGWA, LILA — and it does flag the key systematics, especially lunar regolith scattering and low-frequency foregrounds. However, as a scientific text its central quantitative claims are borrowed from cited forecasts rather than derived, and at least one of its own numerical statements is internally inconsistent. The significance is therefore prospective: the vision is important, but the case as written is not yet a self-contained demonstration.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.3 (dark ages fluctuations)] The statement that 'with N~10^12 modes at redshifted 21cm, one can attain, in principle, a thousand times more precision' and that 'f_NL determinations at the percent level become feasible' is an upper-bound scaling, not a measurement forecast. The paper presents no Fisher calculation, no per-mode signal-to-noise budget, and no foreground-removal demonstration. Its own Fig. 4, adapted from [11], shows large excluded regions in the k_perp-k_parallel plane even for the optimistic 10 km-baseline assumptions; a 100 km array extends k_perp reach but does not remove the foreground wedge. The text should therefore state that N~10^12 is a raw mode count, and that the attainable precision must be evaluated with the mode exclusions and the mK signal against ~10^3 K foregrounds.
  2. [§4.3 (dipole-count sentence)] The sentence 'One needs to fill this area and that requires of order 1/2 D^2/lambda^2 or ~10^6 dipoles' is numerically wrong for the stated parameters. With D=100 km and lambda~10-15 m, D/lambda ~ 10^4, so (D/lambda)^2 ~ 10^8; even with the paper's 1/2 factor the number is ~5x10^7, about two orders of magnitude larger than 10^6. If the intended array diameter is 10 km, then ~10^6 dipoles is plausible, but the text explicitly says d~100 km. This inconsistency means the observing configuration underlying the science case is not quantitatively specified and should be corrected.
  3. [§3 and §4.2/§8.3] The paper repeatedly calls the lunar dark-ages science return 'guaranteed,' but its own assessment is conditional. Section 4.2 states that LuSEE-Night 'may just be able to achieve detection' and that its 'principal outcome will be an improved understanding of the role of lunar regolith in scattering low frequency radio waves'; Section 8.3 similarly notes that environmental backgrounds need to be understood first. A guaranteed signal does not imply a guaranteed detection or a guaranteed fluctuation measurement. The 'guaranteed' language should be replaced by a more careful statement that the science case is compelling but contingent on successful foreground and regolith characterization.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3 (last sentence before 'The future')] 'the detectable dark ages signal could be even lower than the cosmic variance limit' appears to be a typo: the signal cannot be lower than cosmic variance; likely 'noise' or 'foreground residual' was intended.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption says 'imaging at µsec resolution'; from the text and context this should be 'µas resolution.'
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical slips: 'we will. be', 'thomson scattering', 'pf', 'Enciladus', 'µsec' in the hyperscope context. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  4. [§4.3 (n_s value)] The quoted scalar index is '0.9743±0.0034 (ACT, DR6)'; since the argument is about a generic inflationary prediction, the choice of ACT DR6 over the Planck value should be justified or acknowledged as dataset-dependent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the quantitative forecasts are standard mode-count or spectral-distortion scalings, self-citations are peer-reviewed and independently grounded, and the major limitations are feasibility/systematics concerns rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

This is a perspective/vision paper rather than a closed derivation, and I find no step where a claimed prediction reduces by construction to an input or to a self-citation. The central quantitative claim in Sec. 4.3 is the 21-cm mode-count argument: 'With N~10^12 modes at redshifted 21cm, one can attain, in principle, a thousand times more precision in determining cosmological parameters than via the CMB or LSS.' The paper supplies an independent physical basis for N in the same paragraph: 'There are trillions of 21cm modes because the building blocks of galaxies are hydrogen clouds of ~10^6 M_sun, and there are millions of these per typical galaxy.' This is an order-of-magnitude cosmic-variance scaling, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and N is not defined in terms of f_NL. The f_NL~0.01 target comes from Maldacena's inflation consistency relation [6], not from the author's own outputs, and the current limits cited ([3], [4]) are external. Self-citations such as [5], [15], [28], and [10] are used for supporting figures and forecasts; they are peer-reviewed, externally falsifiable, and not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for a claim. The paper also explicitly flags its own main limitation in Sec. 4.2: LuSEE-Night 'may just be able to achieve detection... principal outcome will be an improved understanding of the role of lunar regolith in scattering low frequency radio waves.' The foreground-wedge and baseline exclusions shown in Fig. 4 are acknowledged from the external Fisher study [11]. The lack of an end-to-end Fisher calculation and the numerical issue with the dipole count are scientific/feasibility concerns, not circularity. No definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-load-bearing step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard cosmological inputs (Omega_b h^2, Omega_m h^2, h, etc.) and on cited forecasts for 21-cm mode counts and CMB distortion sensitivity. The free_parameters list is therefore empty. The main load-bearing assumptions are environmental (lunar far-side radio quietness), model-based (LCDM predictions), and programmatic (infrastructure availability).

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Standard LCDM predicts a 21-cm dark ages absorption signal and a mu-type CMB spectral distortion at the levels cited.
    Invoked in Sections 4.1 and 5 to argue the science return is guaranteed.
  • domain assumption The lunar far side is the most radio-quiet environment in the inner solar system and stable enough for mK-level low-frequency measurements.
    Stated in Sections 4.1-4.2; the paper itself warns regolith scattering is a key unknown.
  • domain assumption A filled lunar array of ~100 km diameter with ~10^6 dipoles yields N~10^12 observable 21-cm modes and percent-level f_NL.
    Section 4.3, citing Cole & Silk 2022 and Bull et al. 2024; the dipole count is internally inconsistent.
  • ad hoc to paper The aperture-filling scaling 1/2 D^2/lambda^2 gives ~10^6 dipoles for D=100 km and lambda~10 m.
    Section 4.3; the arithmetic gives ~10^7-10^8, not 10^6, so this assumption is both unstated and incorrect.
  • domain assumption ARTEMIS or equivalent programs will provide launch, delivery, and infrastructure, making lunar telescopes a small marginal cost.
    Section 8.1; the cost argument depends on infrastructure being built regardless.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 14327 in / 12447 out tokens · 138695 ms · 2026-08-04T21:19:49.515579+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Moon is our future. It may seem like a chimera with a projected cost in excess of 100 billion\$, and counting, dispensed on ARTEMIS with little to show to date. However it is the ideal site for the largest telescopes that we can dream about, at wavelengths spanning decimetric radio through optical to terahertz FIR. And it is these future telescopes that will penetrate the fundamental mysteries of the first hydrogen clouds, the first stars, the first galaxies, the first supermassive black holes, and the nearest habitable exoplanets. Nor does it stop there. Our lunar telescopes will take us back to the first months of the Universe, and even back to the first 10$^{-36}$ second after the Big Bang when inflation most likely occurred. Our lunar telescopes will provide high resolution images of exoplanets that are nearby Earth-like 'twins' and provide an unrivalled attempt to answer the ultimate cosmic question of whether we are alone in the universe. Here I will set out my vision of the case for lunar astronomy over the next several decades.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08066 by Joseph Silk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ongoing and proposed terrestrial and space experiments that probe dark energy, the primordial tensor to scalar ratio from inflation, direct and indirect searches for dark matter signals, high energy collider experiments to probe creation of dark matter particles, and possible deviations from Einstein gravity. All seek to explore our cosmic origins. Common to all is that there are no guaranteed science retu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The dark ages shadow, after [1], is shown as the 21cm brightness temperature in mK. Ground-based experiments probe the Universe to redshift of about 20, but are confronted by astrophysical sources of ionizing radiation that prevent any detection of the dark ages signal. One has to go to space experiments, and ultimately to the lunar far side, to optimize any possibility of detecting hydrogen from the dark … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The power in the 21cm fluctuations: trillions of modes [5]. I show several probes of the primordial fluctuation power spectrum. Note the y-axes are different for each probe. In grey is the TT angular power spectrum in units of µK 2 as shown on the right￾hand axis, with multipoles roughly mapped to wavenumbers by ℓ ∼ 14000k/Mpc−1 . In green is the dimensionless 3d matter power spectrum LSS computed with CAM… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fluctuations at 21cm. Targets for a far-side lunar low frequency radio array, central panel taken from [11] with kind permission of the authors. The exclusion plot uses Fisher forecasting to show which cylindrical Fourier modes kperp, kpar are observable with a lunar far side radio interferometer for four representative redshifts. Shaded regions are excluded from the observations due to various observa… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: CMB spectral distortion forecasts. Reading down, CMB is purple line. temper￾ature fluctuations are blue line, CIB is green line, FIRAS limits are black dashed line, upper blue line (dashed plus continuous) is y prediction in quadrature, lower blue line (dashed plus continuous) is µ prediction in quadrature, black dashed line is PIXIE 5 yr sensitivity, red lines are hydrogen and helium recombination line pr… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: From IR telescopes to optical interferometry. The projected sensitivity is shown for a 13 m IR telescope, with aperture chosen so that segmented design fits in the space craft bearings, and takes full advantage of being sited on the floor of a permanently shadowed polar crater [24]. The interferometry projects include an Artemis-enabled optical interferometer array with a baseline of up to 500m [22]. The u… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Electromagnetic Signatures From Primordial Black Holes in the Solar System

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calculations show AMEGO-X could detect PBH transits within 0.1 AU of Earth while HAWC and LHAASO could see explosions out to 0.1-0.5 pc, with future 1000 AU bursts potentially yielding measurable EM signals unlike the...

  2. Electromagnetic Signatures From Primordial Black Holes in the Solar System

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Calculations indicate AMEGO-X could detect PBH transits within 0.1 AU while HAWC and LHAASO could observe explosions out to 0.1-0.5 pc, with future events at ~1000 AU potentially producing measurable electromagnetic s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A., Phys.Rev.D82:023006 (2010)

    Pritchard,J.,& Loeb. A., Phys.Rev.D82:023006 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Rogers, A.: Bowman, J., Spectral Index of the Diffuse Radio Background Measured From 100 to 200 MHz, AJ,136, 641-648(2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non- Gaussianity. Astronomy and Astrophysics641, 0004-6361 (2020)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    European Physical Journal C83, 10052-023-11482-2 (2023)

    Jolicoeur,S.,Maartens,R.,Dlamini,S.,Constrainingprimordialnon-Gaussianityby combining next-generation galaxy and 21 cm intensity mapping surveys. European Physical Journal C83, 10052-023-11482-2 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    and Silk, J., Small-scale primordial fluctuations in the 21 cm Dark Ages signal

    Cole,P. and Silk, J., Small-scale primordial fluctuations in the 21 cm Dark Ages signal. MNRAS501, 2627-2634 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Maldacena, J. 2003. Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models. Journal of High Energy Physics JHEP05(2003), 013 (2003.)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Cabass, G., Pajer, E., Schmidt, F. 2017. How Gaussian can our Universe be?. JCAP 01, 003 (2017) 22 Silk

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    JCAP11, 034 (2022)

    Bartolo,N.,BattistaCarollo,G.,Matarrese,S.,Pilo,L.,Rollo,R.2022.Thephysical content of long tensor modes in cosmology. JCAP11, 034 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Muñoz,J.B.,Ali-Haïmoud,Y.,Kamionkowski,M.2015.Primordialnon-gaussianity from the bispectrum of 21-cm fluctuations in the dark ages. Phys. Rev.D92:083508 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Local non-Gaussianities from cross-correlations between the CMB and 21-cm

    Orlando, G., Flöss, T., Meerburg, P. D., Silk, J. Local non-Gaussianities from cross-correlations between the CMB and 21-cm. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.15046 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15046 2023

  11. [11]

    Modes of the Dark Ages 21cm field accessible to a lunar radio interferometer

    Bull, P., Guandalin, C., Addis, C. Modes of the Dark Ages 21cm field accessible to a lunar radio interferometer. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.16955 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.16955 2024

  12. [12]

    K., Raccanelli, A., Bartolo, N

    de Kruijf, J., Vanzan, E., Boddy, K. K., Raccanelli, A., Bartolo, N. Searching for blue in the dark. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.04991 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.04991 2024

  13. [13]

    J., Cheng, E

    Fixsen, D. J., Cheng, E. S., Gales, J. M., Mather, J. C., Shafer, R. A., Wright, E. L

    work page

  14. [14]

    A., Zeldovich, Y

    Sunyaev, R. A., Zeldovich, Y. B. 1970. Small scale entropy and adiabatic density perturbations — Antimatter in the Universe. Astrophysics and Space Science 9, 368-382 (1970)

    work page 1970

  15. [15]

    Hu, W., Scott, D., Silk, J. 1994. Power Spectrum Constraints from Spectral Dis- tortions in the Cosmic Microwave Background. The Astrophysical Journal 430, L5 (1994)

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): Mission Design and Science Goals arXiv:2405.20403 (2024)

    Kogut, A., Switzer, E., Fixsen, D., Aghanim, N., Chluba, J., Chuss, D., De- labrouille, J., Dvorkin, C., Hensley, B., Hill, C., Maffei, B., Pullen, A., Rotti, A., Sabyr, A., Thiele, L., Wollack, E., Zelko, I. The Primordial Inflation Explorer (PIXIE): Mission Design and Science Goals arXiv:2405.20403 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    and 141 collaborators, PRISM (Polarized Radiation Imaging and Spec- troscopy Mission): An Extended White Paper, JCAP21088 (2014)

    André,P. and 141 collaborators, PRISM (Polarized Radiation Imaging and Spec- troscopy Mission): An Extended White Paper, JCAP21088 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    and 29 colleagues 2021

    Chluba, J. and 29 colleagues 2021. New horizons in cosmology with spectral distor- tions of the cosmic microwave background. Experimental Astronomy51, 1515-1554 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Maillard, J.-P., Is the Moon the future of infrared astronomy?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.37920200212 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Opportunities and limits of lunar gravitational-wave detection

    Cozzumbo, A., Mestichelli, B., Mirabile, M., Paiella, L., Tissino, J., Harms, J. Opportunities and limits of lunar gravitational-wave detection. arXiv e-prints (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    van Belle, G. T. and 10 colleagues 2024. MoonLITE: a CLPS-delivered NASA Astrophysics Pioneers lunar optical interferometer for sensitive, milliarcsecond ob- serving. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.01392 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.01392 2024

  22. [22]

    and 14 colleagues 2024

    Rau, G. and 14 colleagues 2024. Artemis-enabled Stellar Imager (AeSI): A Lunar Long-Baseline UV/Optical Imaging Interferometer. arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.04699 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.04699 2024

  23. [23]

    Astronomy from the Moon: From Exoplan- ets to Cosmology in Visible Light and Beyond

    Schneider, J., Kervella, P., Labeyrie, A. Astronomy from the Moon: From Exoplan- ets to Cosmology in Visible Light and Beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.38220230071 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Maillard, J.-P., Infrared astronomy beyond JWST: the Moon perspective, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.38220230070 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    and Kovetz, E., The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves ARAA,54227–269 (2016)

    Kamionkowski, M. and Kovetz, E., The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves ARAA,54227–269 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    et al., Effect of reheating on predictions following multiple-field inflation, Phys.Rev.D 97 (2018) 2, 023511

    Hotinli, S. et al., Effect of reheating on predictions following multiple-field inflation, Phys.Rev.D 97 (2018) 2, 023511

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    et al., Inflation: Theory and Observations, arXiv 2203.08128 (2022) The Limits of Cosmology 23

    Achúcarro, A. et al., Inflation: Theory and Observations, arXiv 2203.08128 (2022) The Limits of Cosmology 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Desjacques, V., Chluba, J., Silk, J., de Bernardis, F., Doré, O. 2015. Detecting the cosmological recombination signal from space. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 451, 4460Ð4470

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    & Chluba, J., Using the cosmological recombination radiation to probe early dark energy and fundamental constant variations, MNRAS, 519(3), 3664-3680 (2023)

    Hart, L. & Chluba, J., Using the cosmological recombination radiation to probe early dark energy and fundamental constant variations, MNRAS, 519(3), 3664-3680 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Ajith,P.etal.TheLunarGravitational-waveAntenna:MissionStudiesandScience Case, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09181 (2024). 31.https://www.cosmos.esa.int/documents/1866264/1866292/ Voyage2050-Senior-Committee-report-public.pdf/ e2b2631e-5348-5d2d-60c1-437225981b6b?t=1623427287109(2021) 32.https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lunarlabs/lila/(2024)

    arXiv 2024

  31. [33]

    et al, Progress of the TianQin project arXiv:2502.11328 (2025)

    Luo, J. et al, Progress of the TianQin project arXiv:2502.11328 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  32. [1996]

    The Astrophysical Journal 473, 576 (1996)

    The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE FIRAS Data Set. The Astrophysical Journal 473, 576 (1996)

    work page 1996