Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Intensity-dependent precision two-photon Doppler-free spectroscopy of Xe using narrow-bandwidth long-pulse deep-UV laser radiation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy of xenon reaches 750 kHz accuracy, revises the Xe ionization energy by 0.023 cm^-1, and identifies laser chirps, not ac-Stark shifts, as the main intensity-dependent line shifts.

desk verdict Solid new Xe two-photon wavenumbers and a useful chirp-correction method; the revised ionization energy is plausible but rests on a same-group MQDT choice that the paper does not independently test. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08136 v1 pith:MXQ7OKC2 submitted 2025-09-09 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-ph

M. H. Rayment , R. Stech , F. Merkt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-ph
keywords Doppler-freetwo-photonspectroscopyxenonionizationenergyfrequencychirpac-StarkshiftisotopeUVlaseratomicmetrology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using Doppler-free two-photon excitation of the 6p[1/2]_0 state of xenon with long, near-Fourier-limited UV pulses, the authors measure transition wavenumbers for the five abundant isotopes with absolute uncertainty of 750 kHz (e.g., 80118.982918(27) cm^-1 for 136Xe). They turn the laser system's large shot-to-shot intensity fluctuations into a diagnostic: binning each single shot by UV intensity lets them separate intensity-dependent line shifts of up to −20 MHz, which they trace to chirps in the Ti:Sa amplifiers and frequency upconversion, from ac-Stark shifts, which are negligible. Combining these frequencies with a redundant network of earlier precision intervals, they locate the origin of a ~1 GHz disagreement in the xenon ionization energy and revise the natural-abundance-weighted value to 97833.7641(20) cm^-1, 0.023 cm^-1 below the NIST recommendation. The work demonstrates a path to sub-MHz accuracy in pulsed UV two-photon spectroscopy and sharpens a benchmark transition used for VUV generation and calibration.

What carries the argument

Two elements carry the argument. First, a single-shot intensity binning scheme using the scaled intensity I_tilde_UV = (I_UV − I_50%)/(I_75% − I_25%), along with the observed (2+1) REMPI signal ∝ I^9_IR(t), lets the authors compute the effective frequency shift Δf_trans from the instantaneous NIR beat frequency f_beat(t) weighted by the signal envelope (Eq. 4). This converts laser noise into a calibration. Second, a redundant network of energy intervals connecting the Xe ground state, low-lying Rydberg states, and the 2P_3/2 ionization threshold, analyzed by weighted linear least squares, isolates the discrepant interval and identifies which input is wrong.

What would settle it

A direct, high-precision measurement of Rydberg series converging to the Xe+ 2P_3/2 threshold from the ground state — or an independent MQDT analysis of the 6s'[1/2]_0 series limit with sub-MHz uncertainty — would settle whether the new ionization energy is correct; if the old single-channel extrapolation reproduces the series limit, the attribution in this paper fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that a two-photon transition frequency can be measured to sub-MHz accuracy with a strongly fluctuating pulsed UV source provided the intensity is recorded per shot and used to correct a chirp-induced shift. Applied to the Xe (5p)^5 6p[1/2]_0 ← (5p)^6 1S0 transition, this yields 750 kHz absolute values for the five main isotopes. The same data, combined in a weighted least-squares fit of redundant energy intervals, imply that the accepted Xe ionization energy is too high: the natural-abundance-weighted value should be 97833.7641(20) cm^-1, lower by 0.023 cm^-1, and the source of the earlier 1 GHz discrepancy lies in the single-channel Rydberg extrapolation of the 6s'[1/2]_0

Load-bearing premise

The revised ionization energy stands on the claim that the multichannel quantum-defect analysis in Ref. [40] of the 6s[3/2]_2 ionization limit is correct, and that the older single-channel Rydberg extrapolation in Ref. [51] is the source of the 1 GHz discrepancy; if the error instead lies in Ref. [40], the new transition frequencies remain right but the revised ionization energy would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The natural-abundance-weighted first ionization energy of Xe becomes 97833.7641(20) cm^-1, 0.023 cm^-1 below the value in the NIST database.
  • The ~1 GHz discrepancy is traced to the older single-channel Rydberg extrapolation of the 6s'[1/2]_0 series; all other measured intervals are mutually consistent.
  • Absolute transition frequencies of five Xe isotopes are now accurate to 750 kHz, while isotopic shifts are accurate to about 200 kHz.
  • Intensity-dependent shifts of −20 MHz in pulsed UV two-photon spectroscopy can be corrected shot-by-shot, so large laser fluctuations need not limit precision.
  • The corrected 6p[1/2]_0 transition frequency provides a firmer anchor for Xe-based four-wave mixing sources in the VUV.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit is that other pulsed two-photon measurements made with amplified lasers may harbor several-MHz chirp shifts previously misattributed to the ac-Stark effect; reweighting stored intensity data along the lines of Eq. (4) could reveal them.
  • A direct extension is to apply the same redundant-interval audit to the ionization energies of other noble gases whose recommended values rest on single-channel Rydberg extrapolations.
  • A testable consequence is that an independent MQDT-level measurement of the 6s'[1/2]_0 series limit would agree with the revised threshold rather than with the older extrapolation.
  • A practical next step is to reduce the 660 kHz residual first-order Doppler term with slower atoms or tighter beam alignment; the 200 kHz isotope shifts already show the statistical floor is lower.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy of the (5p)^5 6p [1/2]_0 <- (5p)^6 1S0 transition in Xe using long-pulse amplified NIR radiation tripled to 249.6 nm. Single-shot intensity binning is used to characterise intensity-dependent chirp shifts up to -20 MHz and to separate them from ac-Stark shifts. Absolute transition wavenumbers for five isotopes with ~750 kHz uncertainty and isotope shifts with ~200 kHz uncertainty are obtained (Tables II and III). Combining these with existing intervals, the authors reanalyse the Xe ionization energy, obtaining 97833.7800(20) cm^-1 for 136Xe and a natural-abundance-weighted value of 97833.7641(20) cm^-1, revising the NIST value by -0.023 cm^-1 (Sec. IV).

Significance. If the measurements and reanalysis are correct, this work resolves a long-standing ~1 GHz discrepancy and provides a reference-grade ground-state interval. The strengths are substantial: absolute calibration via a GPS-disciplined frequency comb, independent beat-frequency chirp reconstruction, an explicit systematic budget, a redundant interval network, and high-precision isotope shifts. The chirp-versus-intensity method is a useful methodological contribution for pulsed-laser precision spectroscopy. However, the ionization-energy conclusion depends on a preference for the same-group MQDT analysis of Ref. [40] over the Rydberg extrapolation of Ref. [51]; the new data do not test that choice. The transition frequencies themselves are solid and publishable regardless.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Tables V and VI] The claimed revision of the Xe ionization energy is not independently established by the new measurements. The redundant interval network shows only that Intervals (1)-(9) are mutually consistent once both ionization intervals are removed; no measurement in this work reaches the ionization limit. The load-bearing choice is the preference for Interval (10) from Ref. [40] over Interval (11) from Ref. [51]. The discrepancy is 0.033(14) cm^-1, about 3.3 times the 0.01 cm^-1 uncertainty of Ref. [51]. Replacing the single-channel Rydberg extrapolation with a same-group MQDT analysis is an assertion, not a demonstrated result. The conclusion should be reframed as conditional on the correctness of Ref. [40] or supported by an independent test.
  2. [Eq. (4), Table I] The systematic budget does not itemize the uncertainty of the a posteriori chirp-correction calibration. The correction reaches -20 MHz (Figs. 5 and 9), far exceeding the final 750 kHz total uncertainty. If the calibration transfer - FFT phase extraction, the I^9 weighting, and the V_photodiode-to-tilde-I_UV mapping - contains a common-mode error, it is not captured by the scatter across intensity bins and is not listed in Table I. The authors should state explicitly whether this contribution is included in the statistical uncertainty or estimate it separately; otherwise the absolute-accuracy claim lacks a complete error budget.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (1)] The symbol I_UV is used for the instantaneous UV intensity, for the integrated photodiode signal, and for the scaled variable tilde-I_UV. Please introduce distinct notation for the integrated and scaled quantities.
  2. [Sec. IV, last paragraph] 'We believe' is editorial. If the MQDT treatment is judged superior, give a quantitative comparison (e.g., fit residuals for the [51] and [40] analyses) rather than a statement of preference.
  3. [Fig. 9(b) and Fig. 5] The horizontal axis 'Measurement number' in Fig. 9(b) is not defined (ordering, conditions). In Fig. 5, state the sign convention (correction to 2f_UV) in the caption.
  4. [Table I] The residual first-order Doppler shift is listed only as an uncertainty with no shift value; clarify that it is treated as a symmetric bound and note why no correction is applied. Also define 'Frequency Calibration' (comb lock versus chirp calibration).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

New two-photon frequencies are independent, but the revised ionization energy is load-bearing on a same-group preference for Ref. [40] over Ref. [51].

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV, last paragraph (Tables IV and V), around 'The fit yielded a value of 97833.7800(20) cm−1...']
    "The fit yielded a value of 97833.7800(20) cm−1 for the (5p)5 2P3/2 ←(5p)6 1S0 ionization wavenumber of 136Xe, corresponding to the ionization energy determined using Interval (10) from Herburger et al. [40] ... We believe that to reliably determine the ionization energy by Rydberg-series extrapolation in Xe (and other rare gas atoms), it is imperative to rigorously treat channel interactions by multichannel quantum defect theory (as done in Ref. [40]). Using the Rydberg formula for the Rydberg-series extrapolation, as was done in Ref. [51], is not sufficiently accurate."

    The final revised ionization energy is not independently determined by the new measurements; the least-squares value is explicitly 'the ionization energy determined using Interval (10) from Herburger et al. [40]', whose authors include the present senior author. The paper's only argument for preferring [40] over [51] is the assertion that MQDT treatment 'as done in Ref. [40]' is imperative and that the Rydberg-formula approach of [51] 'is not sufficiently accurate.' This is a same-group methodological preference, not a derivation from the new data. If Interval (10) from [40] contained a systematic error, the headline -0.023 cm−1 revision would be wrong, even though every new transition frequency in Table II is correct. The redundant network only localizes the discrepancy to the choice betw

full rationale

The spectroscopic core of the paper is self-contained and non-circular. The two-photon wavenumbers in Table II are measured against a GPS-disciplined frequency comb, the chirp corrections are derived from single-shot beat measurements via Eq. (4), and the intensity binning independently shows that residual ac-Stark shifts are negligible. None of these steps reduces to the paper's own inputs. The circularity concern is confined to the ionization-energy revision in Sec. IV. Here the paper combines its new interval (1) with literature intervals, performs a redundant-network least-squares fit, and finds that the discrepancy must lie between Ref. [40] and Ref. [51]. However, the final value 97833.7800(20) cm−1 is, by the paper's own statement, 'the ionization energy determined using Interval (10) from Herburger et al. [40]'—a result from the same group as the present paper. The paper's justification for rejecting Ref. [51] is an assertion about MQDT accuracy, not an independent measurement or a theorem. This is a load-bearing self-citation: if the MQDT analysis of [40] were incorrect, the revised ionization energy and the -0.023 cm−1 shift from NIST would be incorrect, regardless of the new transition frequencies. Because the central new measurement (Table II) is genuinely independent and the ionization-energy revision is a secondary interpretation that transparently adopts [40], the appropriate score is moderate partial circularity, not full circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The central measurement is calibration-anchored and free of fitted physical constants; the only fit parameters are line-shape nuisance parameters. The external theory assumptions, especially the MQDT preference, carry the revision of the ionization energy.

free parameters (1)
  • Line-shape nuisance parameters (Gamma_Doppler, Gamma_REMPI, sideband separation, relative sideband intensities) = not reported, fitted per spectrum
    Assumed common across isotopes when extracting Doppler-free line centers in Sec. III; affects line-center determination but is not an independent physical constant.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Fourier-transform phase reconstruction of the instantaneous beat frequency (Eq. 3) correctly gives f_beat(t).
    Used in Fig. 4 and Eq. 4 to compute chirp corrections.
  • domain assumption Unsaturated (2+1) REMPI signal and frequency tripling give S_Xe+ proportional to I_IR^9, which justifies the weighting in Eq. 4.
    Sec. II, around Eq. 4 and Fig. 8; if saturation occurs, the chirp correction weighting is wrong.
  • domain assumption The intensity dependence of Delta_f_trans calibrated from beat measurements (Figs. 4 and 5) remains valid when applied retrospectively to spectroscopy scans, even though the beat and spectroscopy data are not simultaneous.
    Sec. III correction procedure; a drift in laser timing or pulse shape would bias corrected line centers.
  • domain assumption The aperture-defined theta_max bounds the residual first-order Doppler shift to 0.66 MHz.
    Table I and Eq. 6; if retroreflection misalignment exceeds theta_max, the largest systematic uncertainty is underestimated.
  • domain assumption MQDT treatment in Ref. [40] is more accurate than single-channel Rydberg extrapolation in Ref. [51].
    Sec. IV final paragraph; this premise selects which conflicting ionization-limit measurement is treated as correct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intensity-dependent precision two-photon Doppler-free spectroscopy of Xe using narrow-bandwidth long-pulse deep-UV laser radiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MXQ7OKC2

@misc{pith2026250908136,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intensity-dependent precision two-photon Doppler-free spectroscopy of Xe using narrow-bandwidth long-pulse deep-UV laser radiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MXQ7OKC2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08136}
}
abstract

We report on a precision measurement of the $(5\mathrm{p})^{5}6\mathrm{p} \, [1/2]_{0}\leftarrow (5\mathrm{p})^{6} \, ^{1}\mathrm{S}_{0}$ transition wavenumber of Xe by Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy using near-Fourier-transform-limited long pulses of UV-laser radiation. The measurements led to absolute uncertainties of 750~kHz in the two-photon transition wavenumbers for the five dominant isotopes of Xe, e.g., 80118.982918(27)~cm$^{-1}$ for $^{136}$Xe. These values were combined with other precision measurements in Xe to resolve an $\sim1~\mathrm{GHz}$ discrepancy between the ionization energy of Xe obtained in recent measurements from the $(6{\rm s})[3/2]_2$ metastable state [Herburger {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. A {\bf 109}, 032816 (2024)] and the ionization energy listed in the NIST atomic database. The analysis indicates that the natural-abundance-weighted ionization energy of Xe should be revised by $-0.023$~cm$^{-1}$ to 97833.7641(20)~cm$^{-1}$. Large fluctuations in the UV-laser pulse intensities were exploited to characterize intensity-dependent shifts of the observed two-photon transition frequencies. Shifts of up to $- 20~\mathrm{MHz}$ were observed and attributed to frequency shifts arising from chirps in the amplification and upconversion of the laser radiation rather than to the ac-Stark effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08136 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram (not to scale) of the experimental setup showing (a) the generation of the Fourier-transform-limited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Histogram of the relative integrated single-shot pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of (a) the pulse applied to the AOM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Determination of the frequency chirps of the NIR laser pulses and their dependence on the delay [(i) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Line shape of the (5p) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectra of the (5p) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Log-log plot of the (2+1) REMPI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Comparison of the central frequencies of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The values of the corresponding wavenumbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Level diagram illustrating the energy intervals used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [51]

    R. D. Knight and L.-g. Wang, One-photon laser spec- troscopy of thenpandnfRydberg series in xenon, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2, 1084 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [40]

    Herburger, E

    H. Herburger, E. N. Toutoudaki, U. Hollenstein, and F. Merkt, High-resolution spectroscopy and multichan- nel quantum-defect-theory analysis of thenpandnfRy- dberg series of Xe below the 2P3/2 ionization threshold, Phys. Rev. A109, 032816 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Biraben, B

    F. Biraben, B. Cagnac, and G. Grynberg, Experimen- tal Evidence of Two-Photon Transition without Doppler Broadening, Phys. Rev. Lett.32, 643 (1974)

    work page 1974

  4. [2]

    M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Observation of Two-Photon Absorption without Doppler Broadening on the 3S-5STransition in Sodium Vapor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 645 (1974)

    work page 1974

  5. [3]

    H¨ ansch, K

    T. H¨ ansch, K. Harvey, G. Meisel, and A. Schawlow, Two- photon spectroscopy of Na 3s-4d without Doppler broad- ening using a cw dye laser, Opt. Commun.11, 50 (1974)

    work page 1974

  6. [4]

    Biraben, The first decades of Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy, C

    F. Biraben, The first decades of Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy, C. R. Phys.20, 671 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [5]

    T. W. H¨ ansch, S. A. Lee, R. Wallenstein, and C. Wieman, Doppler-Free Two-Photon Spectroscopy of Hydrogen 1S- 2S, Phys. Rev. Lett.34, 307 (1975)

    work page 1975

  8. [6]

    C. G. Parthey, A. Matveev, J. Alnis, B. Bernhardt, A. Beyer, R. Holzwarth, A. Maistrou, R. Pohl, K. Pre- dehl, T. Udem, T. Wilken, N. Kolachevsky, M. Abgrall, D. Rovera, C. Salomon, P. Laurent, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Improved measurement of the hydrogen 1S–2Stransition frequency, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 203001 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 64 references
  1. [7]

    Demtr¨ oder, Doppler-free laser spectroscopy, inHand- book of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol

    W. Demtr¨ oder, Doppler-free laser spectroscopy, inHand- book of High-Resolution Spectroscopy, Vol. 3, edited by M. Quack and F. Merkt (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester,

  2. [8]

    G. D. Dickenson, E. J. Salumbides, M. Niu, Ch. Jungen, S. C. Ross, and W. Ubachs, Precision spectroscopy of high rotational states in H 2 investigated by Doppler-free two-photon laser spectroscopy in theEF 1Σ+ g –X 1Σ+ g system, Phys. Rev. A86, 032502 (2012)

    2012

  3. [9]

    G. Zhao, D. M. Bailey, A. J. Fleisher, J. T. Hodges, and K. K. Lehmann, Doppler-free two-photon cavity ring- down spectroscopy of a nitrous oxide (N 2O) vibrational overtone transition, Phys. Rev. A101, 10.1103/phys- reva.101.062509 (2020)

    2020 doi

  4. [10]

    K.-F. Lai, M. Beyer, E. J. Salumbides, and W. Ubachs, Photolysis production and spectroscopic investigation of the highest vibrational states in H 2 (X 1Σ+ g v=13,14), J. Phys. Chem. A125, 1221 (2021)

    2021

  5. [11]

    C. Roth, A. Mart ´ ınez de Velasco, E. L. Gr¨ undeman, M. Collombon, M. Beyer, V. Barb´ e, and K. S. E. Eikema, High-precision Ramsey-comb spectroscopy on molecular deuterium for tests of molecular quantum theory, Mol. Phys.121, e2211405 (2023)

    2023

  6. [12]

    Liu, M.-Y

    Y.-Z. Liu, M.-Y. Yu, Y.-D. Tan, J. Wang, C.-F. Cheng, W. Jiang, and S.-M. Hu, Midinfrared Cavity-Enhanced Two-Photon Absorption Spectroscopy for Selective De- tection of Trace Gases, Anal. Chem.97, 848 (2025)

    2025

  7. [13]

    Bloembergen and M

    N. Bloembergen and M. D. Levenson, Doppler-free two- photon absorption spectroscopy, inTopics in Applied Physics(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,

  8. [14]

    J. C. Bergquist, Doppler-Free Spectroscopy, inExperi- mental Methods in the Physical Sciences(Elsevier, 1996) pp. 255–272

    1996

  9. [15]

    K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, W. Vassen, and W. Hoger- vorst, Precision measurements in helium at 58 nm: Ground state Lamb shift and the 1 1S–2 1Ptransition isotope shifts, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 1216 (1996)

    1996

  10. [16]

    K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, W. Vassen, and W. Hoger- vorst, Lamb shift measurement in the 1 1Sground state of helium, Phys. Rev. A55, 1866 (1997)

    1997

  11. [17]

    S. D. Bergeson, A. Balakrishnan, K. G. H. Baldwin, T. B. Lucatorto, J. P. Marangos, T. J. McIlrath, T. R. O’Brian, S. L. Rolston, C. J. Sansonetti, J. Wen, N. Westbrook, C. H. Cheng, and E. E. Eyler, Measurement of the He ground state Lamb shift via the two-photon 1 1S–2 1S tr...

    1998

  12. [18]

    S. D. Bergeson, K. G. H. Baldwin, T. B. Lucatorto, T. J. McIlrath, C. H. Cheng, and E. E. Eyler, Doppler-free two-photon spectroscopy in the vacuum ultraviolet: he- lium 1 1S - 2 1S transition, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B17, 1599 (2000)

    2000

  13. [19]

    Hollenstein, H

    U. Hollenstein, H. Palm, and F. Merkt, A broadly tun- able extreme ultraviolet laser source with a 0.008 cm −1 bandwidth, Rev. Sci. Instr.71, 4023 (2000)

    2000

  14. [20]

    Brandi, W

    F. Brandi, W. Hogervorst, and W. Ubachs, High- resolution vacuum-ultraviolet und ultraviolet photoion- ization spectroscopy of krypton, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.35, 1071 (2002)

    2002

  15. [21]

    Seiler, Th

    R. Seiler, Th. Paul, M. Andrist, and F. Merkt, Gen- eration of programmable near-Fourier-transform-limited pulses of narrow-band laser radiation from the near in- frared to the vacuum ultraviolet, Rev. Sci. Instr.76, 103103 (2005)

    2005

  16. [22]

    Th. A. Paul and F. Merkt, High-resolution spectroscopy of xenon using a tunable Fourier-transform-limited all- solid-state vacuum-ultraviolet laser system, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.38, 4145 (2005)

    2005

  17. [23]

    Hannemann, E

    S. Hannemann, E. J. Salumbides, S. Witte, R. T. Zinkstok, E.-J. van Duijn, K. S. E. Eikema, and W. Ubachs, Frequency metrology on theEF 1Σ+ g ← X 1Σ+ g (0,0) transition in H 2, HD, and D 2, Phys. Rev. A74, 062514 (2006). 14

    2006

  18. [24]

    J. Liu, E. J. Salumbides, U. Hollenstein, J. C. J. Koele- meij, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, and F. Merkt, Deter- mination of the ionization and dissociation energies of the hydrogen molecule, J. Chem. Phys.130, 174306 (2009)

    2009

  19. [25]

    M. L. Niu, E. J. Salumbides, D. Zhao, N. de Oliveira, D. Joyeux, L. Nahon, R. W. Field, and W. Ubachs, High resolution spectroscopy and perturbation analysis of the CO A 1Π–X 1Σ+ (0,0) and (1,0) bands, Mol. Phys.111, 2163 (2013)

    2013

  20. [26]

    Cheng, J

    C.-F. Cheng, J. Hussels, M. Niu, H. L. Bethlem, K. S. E. Eikema, E. J. Salumbides, W. Ubachs, M. Beyer, N. H¨ olsch, J. A. Agner, F. Merkt, L.-G. Tao, S.-M. Hu, and Ch. Jungen, Dissociation energy of the hydrogen molecule at 10−9 accuracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 013001 (2018)

    2018

  21. [27]

    Beyer, N

    M. Beyer, N. H¨ olsch, J. Hussels, C.-F. Cheng, E. J. Salumbides, K. S. E. Eikema, W. Ubachs, Ch. Jungen, and F. Merkt, Determination of the interval between the ground states of para- and ortho-H 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 163002 (2019)

    2019

  22. [28]

    Herburger, U

    H. Herburger, U. Hollenstein, J. A. Agner, and F. Merkt, PFI-ZEKE-photoelectron spectroscopy of N 2O using narrow-band VUV laser radiation generated by four-wave mixing in Ar using a KBBF crystal, J. Chem. Phys.151, 144302 (2019)

    2019

  23. [29]

    Hussels,Improved Determination of the Dissociation Energy of H2, HD and D2, Ph.D

    J. Hussels,Improved Determination of the Dissociation Energy of H2, HD and D2, Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2021)

    2021

  24. [30]

    Hussels, N

    J. Hussels, N. H¨ olsch, C.-F. Cheng, E. J. Salumbides, H. L. Bethlem, K. S. E. Eikema, Ch. Jungen, M. Beyer, F. Merkt, and W. Ubachs, Improved ionization and dis- sociation energies of the deuterium molecule, Phys. Rev. A105, 022820 (2022)

    2022

  25. [31]

    H¨ olsch, I

    N. H¨ olsch, I. Doran, F. Merkt, J. Hussels, C.-F. Cheng, E. J. Salumbides, H. L. Bethlem, K. S. E. Eikema, M. Beyer, W. Ubachs, and Ch. Jungen, Ionization and dissociation energies of HD and dipole-inducedg/u- symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. A108, 022811 (2023)

    2023

  26. [32]

    M. W. Heiss, L. D. S. Borges, A. Golovizin, and P. Criv- elli, Measurement of the 13S1 →2 3S1 interval in positro- nium using field ionization of Rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A111, 012810 (2025)

    2025

  27. [33]

    E. E. Eyler, A. Yiannopoulou, S. Gangopadhyay, and S. Melikechi, Chirp-free nanosecond laser amplifier for precision spectroscopy, Opt. Lett.22, 49 (1997)

    1997

  28. [34]

    R. T. White, Y. He, B. J. Orr, M. Kono, and K. G. H. Baldwin, Control of frequency chirp in nanosecond- pulsed laser spectroscopy. 1. Optical-heterodyne chirp analysis techniques, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B21, 1577 (2004)

    2004

  29. [35]

    Y.-M. Yiu, K. D. Bonin, and T. J. McIlrath, Two-photon resonant upconversion in xenon, Opt. Lett.7, 268 (1982)

    1982

  30. [36]

    R. H. Page, R. J. Larkin, A. H. Kung, Y. R. Shen, and Y. T. Lee, Frequency tripling into the 720–1025-˚A region with pulsed free jets, Rev. Sci. Instr.58, 1616 (1987)

    1987

  31. [37]

    Cromwell, T

    E. Cromwell, T. Trickl, Y. T. Lee, and A. H. Kung, Ul- tranarrow bandwidth VUV-XUV laser system, Rev. Sci. Instr.60, 2888 (1989)

    1989

  32. [38]

    Tunnermann, C

    A. Tunnermann, C. Momma, K. Mossavi, C. Windolph, and B. Welleghausen, Generation of tunable short pulse VUV radiation by four-wave mixing in xenon with fem- tosecond KrF-excimer laser pulses, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.29, 1233 (1993)

    1993

  33. [39]

    Wellegehausen, H

    B. Wellegehausen, H. Welling, C. Momma, M. Feuerhake, K. Mossavi, and H. Eichmann, Generation of short-pulse VUV and XUV radiation, Opt. Quantum Electron.28, 267 (1996)

    1996

  34. [41]

    Kramida, Yu

    A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, and NIST ASD Team, NIST atomic spectra database (version 5.10), [online]. Avail- able: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2023, May 09] (2022)

    2023

  35. [42]

    Brandi, I

    F. Brandi, I. Velchev, W. Hogervorst, and W. Ubachs, Vacuum-ultraviolet spectroscopy of Xe: Hyperfine split- tings, isotope shifts, and isotope-dependent ionization en- ergies, Phys. Rev. A64, 032505 (2001)

    2001

  36. [43]

    V. L. Sukhorukov, I. D. Petrov, M. Sch¨ afer, F. Merkt, M.-W. Ruf, and H. Hotop, Photoionization dynamics of excited Ne, Ar, Kr and Xe atoms near threshold, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.45, 092001 (2012)

    2012

  37. [44]

    Scheidegger, D

    S. Scheidegger, D. Schlander, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, P. Jansen, and F. Merkt, Barrier-discharge source of cold hydrogen atoms in supersonic beams: Stark effect in the 1s–2s transition, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.55, 155002 (2022)

    2022

  38. [45]

    Deiglmayr, H

    J. Deiglmayr, H. Herburger, H. Saßmannshausen, P. Jansen, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Precision mea- surement of the ionization energy of Csi, Phys. Rev. A 93, 013424 (2016)

    2016

  39. [46]

    L. B. de Amorim, G. D. Cavalcanti, and R. M. Cruz, The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance, Appl. Soft Comput.133, 109924 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Scheidegger, J

    S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. A108, 042803 (2023)

    2023

  41. [48]

    Mills, T

    I. Mills, T. Cvitaˇ s, K. Homann, N. Kallay, and K. Ku- chitsu,Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chem- istry, 2nd ed. (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1993)

    1993

  42. [49]

    Meija, T

    J. Meija, T. B. Coplen, M. Berglund, W. A. Brand, P. De Bi` evre, M. Gr¨ oning, N. E. Holden, J. Irrgeher, R. D. Loss, T. Walczyk, and T. Prohaska, Isotopic com- positions of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Re- port), Pure Appl. Chem.88, 293 (2016)

    2013

  43. [50]

    Gangopadhyay, N

    S. Gangopadhyay, N. Melikechi, and E. E. Eyler, Optical phase perturbations in nanosecond pulsed amplification and second-harmonic generation, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B11, 231 (1994)

    1994

  44. [52]

    C. J. Humphreys and E. Paul Jr., Interferometric wave- length determination in the first spectrum of 136Xe, J. Opt. Soc. Am.60, 1302 (1970)

    1970

  45. [53]

    L. S. Dreissen, C. Roth, E. L. Gr¨ undeman, J. J. Krauth, M. Favier, and K. S. E. Eikema, High-Precision Ramsey- Comb Spectroscopy Based on High-Harmonic Genera- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 143001 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    L. S. Dreissen, C. Roth, E. L. Gr¨ undeman, J. J. Krauth, M. G. J. Favier, and K. S. E. Eikema, Ramsey-comb pre- cision spectroscopy in xenon at vacuum ultraviolet wave- lengths produced with high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A101, 052509 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    T. A. Littlefield and M. Rafi, Interferometric wavelength measurements in the infra-red spectrum of isotope xenon 136, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys.7, 612 (1974)

    1974

  48. [56]

    [40, 42, 51–55, 59–64]

    See Supplemental Material [url] for tables of determined 15 energy intervals between the 6s[3/2]2, 6s′[1/2]0, 6p[1/2]0, 8s[3/2]1 and 8d[1/2]1 low-lying electronic states of 136Xe and of the isotopic shift of the of the Xe + (5p)5 2P3/2 ← Xe (5p) 6 1 S0 first ionization frequen...

  49. [57]

    Sterr, A

    U. Sterr, A. Bard, C. J. Sansonetti, S. L. Rolston, and J. D. Gillaspy, Determination of the xenon 6s [3/2] 2 − (5p)5 6s′ [1/2]0 clock frequency by interferometric wave- length measurements, Opt. Lett.20, 1421 (1995)

    1995

  50. [58]

    D. L. Albritton, A. L. Schmeltekopf, and R. N. Zare, An introduction to the least-squares fitting of spectroscopic data, inMolecular Spectroscopy: Modern Research, Vol. II, edited by K. N. Rao (Academic Press, 1976) Chap. 1, pp. 1–67

    1976

  51. [59]

    D. A. Jackson and M.-C. Coulombe, Isotope shifts in the arc spectrum of xenon, Proc. R. Soc. London A338, 277 (1974)

    1974

  52. [60]

    M. D. Plimmer, P. E. G. Baird, C. J. Foot, D. N. Stacey, J. B. Swan, and G. K. Woodgate, Isotope shift in xenon by Doppler-free two-photon laser spectroscopy, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.22, L241 (1989)

    1989

  53. [61]

    Borchers, E

    W. Borchers, E. Arnold, W. Neu, R. Neugart, K. Wendt, G. Ulm, and ISOLDE Collaboration, Xenon isotopes far from stability studied by collisional ionization laser spec- troscopy, Phys. Lett. B216, 7 (1989)

    1989

  54. [62]

    D’Amico, G

    G. D’Amico, G. Pesce, and A. Sasso, Isotope-shift and hyperfine-constant measurements of near-infrared xenon transitions in glow discharges and on a metastable Xe(3P2) beam, Phys. Rev. A60, 4409 (1999)

    1999

  55. [63]

    Suzuki, K

    M. Suzuki, K. Katoh, and N. Nishimiya, Saturated ab- sorption spectroscopy of Xe using a GaAs semiconductor laser, Spectrochim. Acta A58, 2519 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Altiere, E

    E. Altiere, E. R. Miller, T. Hayamizu, D. J. Jones, K. W. Madison, and T. Momose, High-resolution two-photon spectroscopy of a 5p56p←5p 6 transition of xenon, Phys. Rev. A97, 012507 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.