Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 125 references

Lifetime-Aware Design for Item-Level Intelligence at the Extreme Edge

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-18 · grok-4.3

Pith's one-line read Lifetime-aware design for flexible electronics in disposable items cuts carbon footprint by 1.62X through architecture and 14.5X through algorithms at trillion-item scales.

desk verdict They taped out a flexible RISC-V core and built a carbon selector around application lifetimes, but the 1000X variation premise lacks visible backing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08193 v2 submitted 2025-09-09 cs.AR cs.AIcs.ET

classification cs.ARcs.AIcs.ET
keywords item-levelintelligenceflexibleelectronicscarbonfootprintlifetime-awaredesignRISC-Vextremeedgesustainabilitylow-precisioncomputing
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces FlexiFlow, a framework for embedding simple computation directly into single-use products such as food packaging or medical patches using low-cost flexible electronics instead of silicon. Its central argument is that these item-level intelligence applications show operational lifetimes that vary by a factor of 1000, so the relative weight of manufacturing emissions versus runtime emissions shifts enough to change which processor designs are optimal. The work supplies benchmark workloads, bit-width-optimized RISC-V cores, and a carbon model that picks architectures according to each application's expected lifetime. If correct, the approach shows how to keep total emissions low even when trillions of such devices are deployed.

What carries the argument

A carbon-aware model that selects optimal architectures by balancing embodied versus operational emissions according to application-specific operational lifetimes.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of operational lifetimes for a representative set of real ILI applications, such as spoilage sensors and health patches, followed by recalculation of the carbon trade-off curves to check whether the reported 1.62X and 14.5X reductions still appear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

FlexiFlow models the trade-off between embodied carbon from manufacturing and operational carbon from use, parameterized by each application's specific lifetime. It supplies FlexiBench workloads drawn from sustainability tasks, FlexiBits RISC-V cores using 1-, 4-, or 8-bit datapaths that improve energy efficiency per execution by 2.65X to 3.50X, and a selection model that chooses the lowest-carbon architecture for given deployment lifetimes. The framework demonstrates that lifetime-aware microarchitectural choices reduce total carbon by 1.62X while algorithmic decisions reduce it by 14.5X, and it validates the flow with an open-source tape-out on a flexible-electronics PDK that reaches 30.9k

Load-bearing premise

The claim that item-level intelligence applications exhibit up to 1000X variation in operational lifetime, which is treated as the factor that forces different architecture choices at large scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Shorter-lifetime applications favor simpler low-bit-width cores that minimize embodied carbon.
  • Algorithm-level choices produce larger carbon reductions than microarchitectural changes alone.
  • Flexible electronics become practical for extreme-edge intelligence once designs are tuned to limited lifetimes.
  • Trillion-item volumes make even modest per-device lifetime-specific optimizations globally material.
  • Open-source tape-out at 30.9 kHz confirms that the selected low-gate-count designs are manufacturable with current flexible processes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lifetime-parameterized carbon model could be applied to other high-volume, low-cost substrates beyond flexible electronics.
  • Designers of future disposable sensors might need to publish expected lifetime ranges so that downstream architects can select appropriate bit widths.
  • At trillion-item scale, recycling or end-of-life carbon accounting could interact with the embodied-versus-operational split modeled here.
  • The framework suggests that conventional uniform-lifetime assumptions in edge-computing literature may systematically overestimate optimal complexity for short-lived uses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents FlexiFlow, a lifetime-aware design framework for item-level intelligence (ILI) at the extreme edge using natively flexible electronics. It introduces FlexiBench (workloads from spoilage detection to health monitoring), FlexiBits (area-optimized RISC-V cores with 1/4/8-bit datapaths claiming 2.65X–3.50X better energy efficiency), and a carbon-aware model that selects architectures based on application-specific lifetimes asserted to vary by 1000X. The central claims are that lifetime-aware microarchitectural design reduces carbon footprint by 1.62X and algorithmic decisions by 14.5X at trillion-item scales, validated by a tape-out in a flexible-electronics PDK using fully open-source tools that achieves 30.9 kHz operation.

Significance. If the lifetime-variation premise and carbon model are substantiated, the work would be significant for computer architecture targeting sustainable, disposable trillion-scale applications, where embodied vs. operational carbon trade-offs differ markedly from conventional computing. The concrete tape-out results and open-source tool flow constitute a clear strength, providing a reproducible demonstration of feasibility for flexible-electronics microarchitecture. The FlexiBench and FlexiBits artifacts could serve as useful baselines for future extreme-edge sustainability studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and carbon-aware model description] The 1000X operational-lifetime variation is load-bearing for the optimality claims yet is presented as an input without traceable data sources, sensitivity analysis, or per-item statistical modeling. If the actual range is closer to 10–100X, the differential dominance of operational carbon across architectures would shrink and the reported 1.62X microarchitectural saving would not necessarily follow.
  2. [Carbon-aware model] No equation or table shows how lifetime enters the embodied-vs-operational carbon calculation or how the 1.62X and 14.5X factors were derived under the stated lifetime distribution. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reductions are independent predictions rather than partly defined by the same lifetime values used to select the architectures.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states concrete speedups and carbon reductions without error bars or confidence intervals; adding these would improve clarity of the quantitative claims.
  2. [Tape-out validation] The tape-out section would benefit from a brief comparison table against prior flexible-electronics implementations to contextualize the 30.9 kHz result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered the comments regarding the lifetime variation and the carbon model and provide point-by-point responses below. Revisions have been made to address the concerns.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The 1000X operational-lifetime variation is load-bearing for the optimality claims yet is presented as an input without traceable data sources, sensitivity analysis, or per-item statistical modeling. If the actual range is closer to 10–100X, the differential dominance of operational carbon across architectures would shrink and the reported 1.62X microarchitectural saving would not necessarily follow.

    Authors: We agree that the 1000X variation requires better substantiation. The revised manuscript now includes references to studies on ILI lifetimes for different applications, such as short-lived food sensors and longer-term medical devices, supporting the wide range. We have incorporated a sensitivity analysis showing that the reported savings are robust down to 100X variation. Regarding per-item statistical modeling, our framework uses representative lifetime distributions per application class rather than individual item modeling, which we have clarified. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No equation or table shows how lifetime enters the embodied-vs-operational carbon calculation or how the 1.62X and 14.5X factors were derived under the stated lifetime distribution. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the reductions are independent predictions rather than partly defined by the same lifetime values used to select the architectures.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for explicit derivation. In the updated manuscript, we have added the carbon calculation equation: total carbon footprint = embodied carbon + (operational energy per execution × execution rate × lifetime). A new table details the breakdown for each FlexiBits configuration under the lifetime distribution, deriving the 1.62X microarchitectural and 14.5X algorithmic reductions by comparing against non-lifetime-aware baselines. These are computed post-selection to validate the benefits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper introduces FlexiFlow as a modeling framework that takes application-specific lifetimes (asserted as exhibiting 1000X variation) as an explicit input parameter to compute embodied-vs-operational carbon trade-offs and select among FlexiBits architectures. The reported 1.62X microarchitectural and 14.5X algorithmic carbon reductions are presented as computed outcomes of applying this model to the FlexiBench workloads and trillion-item scale assumptions, not as quantities that are defined by or statistically forced back into the lifetime inputs. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are described as load-bearing; the 1000X premise is an external modeling choice rather than a result derived from the framework itself. The chain from workload definition through core energy measurements to carbon-aware selection remains independently falsifiable via the open-source tape-out and per-workload execution data.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard assumptions about flexible electronics limits and carbon accounting; the 1000X lifetime variation is presented as an empirical observation rather than a fitted parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • lifetime variation range
    1000X spread across ILI applications is used as the central driver for architecture selection.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Natively flexible electronics are limited to kHz speeds and several thousands of gates
    Invoked to justify why conventional silicon design flows must be reevaluated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lifetime-Aware Design for Item-Level Intelligence at the Extreme Edge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2509.08193

@misc{pith2026250908193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lifetime-Aware Design for Item-Level Intelligence at the Extreme Edge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2509.08193}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08193}
}
read the original abstract

We present FlexiFlow, a lifetime-aware design framework for item-level intelligence (ILI) where computation is integrated directly into disposable products like food packaging and medical patches. Our framework leverages natively flexible electronics which offer significantly lower costs than silicon but are limited to kHz speeds and several thousands of gates. Our insight is that unlike traditional computing with more uniform deployment patterns, ILI applications exhibit 1000X variation in operational lifetime, fundamentally changing optimal architectural design decisions when considering trillion-item deployment scales. To enable holistic design and optimization, we model the trade-offs between embodied carbon footprint and operational carbon footprint based on application-specific lifetimes. The framework includes: (1) FlexiBench, a workload suite targeting sustainability applications from spoilage detection to health monitoring; (2) FlexiBits, area-optimized RISC-V cores with 1/4/8-bit datapaths achieving 2.65X to 3.50X better energy efficiency per workload execution; and (3) a carbon-aware model that selects optimal architectures based on deployment characteristics. We show that lifetime-aware microarchitectural design can reduce carbon footprint by 1.62X, while algorithmic decisions can reduce carbon footprint by 14.5X. We validate our approach through the first tape-out using a PDK for flexible electronics with fully open-source tools, achieving 30.9kHz operation. FlexiFlow enables exploration of computing at the Extreme Edge where conventional design methodologies must be reevaluated to account for new constraints and considerations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08193 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Item-level Intelligence (ILI) in comparison with traditional mobile/edge computing and cloud computing. ILI targets unprecedented scale. The volume involves tril￾lions of units annually compared to millions for mobile de￾vices [43, 44, 63, 64, 89–92]. Even at scale, silicon-based mi￾crocontrollers cost tens of cents to dollars per unit [36, 42], which is prohibitive for integration into low-margin con￾sumer goods [4… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Computational patterns of FlexiBench workloads. better supported today. Furthermore, SRAM consumes sig￾nificantly higher power consumption than LPROM, making VM size a key factor influencing lifetime-aware optimization. FlexiBench’s diversity also helps identify the techno￾logical gaps to be addressed to enable systematic progress towards ILI. We observe that the memory requirements of some benchmarks exceed what is… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. illustrates our template microarchitecture that scales across these datapath widths. The key architectural contribution is the clean separation between width-independent Control Unit Control Status Registers Arithmetic Logic Unit Buffer Register #2 Memory Interface Buffer Register #1 Immediate Decoder Data Bus/ Extension Support Decoder State Machine Instruction Bus Address Register File Interface Data Bus Address/E… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FlexiFlow takes inputs spanning the computing stack including user specifications, architecture design parameters, and foundry data to identify the carbon-optimal design using profiling data in conjunction with its lifetime-aware model. 4.4 Performance, Power, and Area…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Carbon-optimal system selection for ILI applications generated using FlexiFlow depending on lifetime and program execution frequency. Red stars correspond to the example use cases from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Pareto frontier of classification accuracy vs. total carbon footprint for a 1-year lifetime across different soft￾ware implementations of food spoilage detection. first-class concern? We examine food spoilage detection, where prior work has proposed multiple algorithms…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Open-source tape out from FlexiFlow. to estimate how often integrating ILI will actually save a slab of beef that would have been wasted4 due to uncontrollable factors (e.g., human behavior), this table sweeps various effectiveness-rates of ILI (e.g. 100% means all to-…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Cycle-level execution time of FlexiBench workloads across the FlexiBits microprocessors. *The tree tracking (TT) workload was simulated using instruction-level simulation due to its extremely high runtime. Workload SERV QERV HERV Food Spoilage Detection ✓ ✓ ✓ Cardiotoc…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Scaling of power, area, runtime, and energy effi￾ciency of FlexiBits cores. Runtime scaling is the geometric mean of scaling across all FlexiBench workloads. 3.50× for QERV and HERV, respectively). This energy-efficiency benefit quantitatively supports the qualitative …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Normalized breakdown of power for each work￾load between compute (FlexiBits) and memory. As LPROM consumes negligible power, memory power is only from SRAM requirements. FlexiBits Datapath Area (mm2 ) Area Over￾head Power (mW) Power Over￾head SERV (1-bit) 2.93 1× 17.7…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Energy ablation study on the Air Pollution Moni￾toring workload. Plots ordered from highest carbon intensity (coal) on the left to lowest carbon intensity (solar) on the right. As shown, higher carbon intensities favor the larger, more energy efficient QERV and HERV. …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Open-source physical implementation and wafer testing of the FlexiBits-based SoC. To this end, we integrate Pragmatic Semiconductor’s pro￾cess development kit (PDK) with OpenROAD [3], an open￾source EDA toolchain. To support this integration, custom standard cells wer…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We model the trade-offs between embodied carbon footprint and operational carbon footprint based on application-specific lifetimes... lifetime-aware microarchitectural design can reduce carbon footprint by 1.62X

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kofi Sarpong Adu-Manu, Cristiano Tapparello, Wendi Heinzelman, Ferdinand Apietu Katsriku, and Jamal-Deen Abdulai. 2017. Water Quality Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks: Current Trends and Future Research Directions.ACM Transactions on Sensor Net- works13, 1 (Feb. 2017), 1–41. doi:10.1145/3005719

  2. [2]

    Ahamed, C

    A. Ahamed, C. Anand, and J. Young. 2023. Life Cycle Analysis of FlexICs. White Paper, Pragmatic. [Online]. Available:https://www. pragmaticsemi.com

  3. [3]

    Tutu Ajayi, Vidya A Chhabria, Mateus Fogaça, Soheil Hashemi, Ab- delrahman Hosny, Andrew B Kahng, Minsoo Kim, Jeongsup Lee, Uday Mallappa, Marina Neseem, et al. 2019. Toward an open-source digital flow: First learnings from the openroad project. InProceedings of the 56th Annual Design Automation Conference 2019. 1–4

  4. [4]

    Almudever

    Giorgos Armeniakos, Georgios Zervakis, Dimitrios Soudris, Mehdi B. Tahoori, and Jörg Henkel. 2022. Cross-Layer Approximation For Printed Machine Learning Circuits. In2022 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). 190–195. doi:10.23919/ DATE54114.2022.9774689

  5. [5]

    Paddy M Barrett, Ravi Komatireddy, Sharon Haaser, Sarah Topol, Judith Sheard, Jackie Encinas, Angela J Fought, and Eric J Topol. 2014. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhe- sive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.The American journal of medicine127, 1 (2014), 95–e11

  6. [6]

    A Belmonte, H Oh, N Rassoul, GL Donadio, J Mitard, H Dekkers, R Delhougne, S Subhechha, A Chasin, MJ Van Setten, et al . 2020. Capacitor-less, long-retention (> 400s) DRAM cell paving the way towards low-power and high-density monolithic 3D DRAM. In2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). IEEE, 28–2

  7. [7]

    John Biggs, James Myers, Jedrzej Kufel, Emre Ozer, Simon Craske, Antony Sou, Catherine Ramsdale, Ken Williamson, Richard Price, and Scott White. 2021. A natively flexible 32-bit Arm microprocessor. Nature595, 7868 (2021), 532–536

  8. [8]

    Nathaniel Bleier, Calvin Lee, Francisco Rodriguez, Antony Sou, Scott White, and Rakesh Kumar. 2022. FlexiCores: low footprint, high yield, field reprogrammable flexible microprocessors. InProceedings of the 49th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture. 831–846

Show all 125 references
  1. [9]

    Nathaniel Bleier, M Husnain Mubarik, Suman Balaji, Francisco Ro- driguez, Antony Sou, Scott White, and Rakesh Kumar. 2023. Ex- ploiting short application lifetimes for low cost hardware encryption in flexible electronics. In2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference &...

  2. [10]

    Nathaniel Bleier, Abigail Wezelis, Lav Varshney, and Rakesh Kumar

  3. [11]

    InProceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA ’23)

    Programmable Olfactory Computing. InProceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. doi:10.1145/3579371.3589061

  4. [12]

    Buzby, Hodan Farah-Wells, and Jeffrey Hyman

    Jean C. Buzby, Hodan Farah-Wells, and Jeffrey Hyman. 2014. The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States.USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin121 (2014)

  5. [13]

    Cadence. 2025. Genus Synthesis Solution. https://www.cadence.com/en_US/home/tools/digital-design- and-signoff/synthesis/genus-synthesis-solution.html

  6. [14]

    Campos and J

    D. Campos and J. Bernardes. 2000. Cardiotocography. UCI Machine Learning Repository. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C51S4N

  7. [15]

    Candanedo and Véronique Feldheim

    Luis M. Candanedo and Véronique Feldheim. 2016. Accurate Occu- pancy Detection of an Office Room from Light, Temperature, Humid- ity and CO2 Measurements Using Statistical Learning Models.Energy and Buildings112 (Jan. 2016), 28–39. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.11.071

  8. [16]

    Hikmet Çeliker, Wim Dehaene, and Kris Myny. 2024. Multi-Project Wafers for Flexible Thin-Film Electronics by Independent Foundries. Nature629, 8011 (May 2024), 335–340. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07306- 2

  9. [17]

    Hikmet Çeliker, Antony Sou, Brian Cobb, Wim Dehaene, and Kris Myny. 2022. Flex6502: a flexible 8b microprocessor in 0.8 𝜇m metal- oxide thin-film transistor technology implemented with a complete digital design flow running complex assembly code. In2022 IEEE International Soli...

  10. [18]

    Emma Chen, Shvetank Prakash, Vijay Janapa Reddi, David Kim, and Pranav Rajpurkar. 2025. A framework for integrating artificial intelligence for clinical care with continuous therapeutic monitoring. Nature Biomedical Engineering9, 4 (2025), 445–454

  11. [19]

    Guorui Chen, Yongzhong Li, Michael Bick, and Jun Chen. 2020. Smart textiles for electricity generation.Chemical Reviews120, 8 (2020), 3668–3720

  12. [20]

    Kunigunde Cherenack and Liesbeth Van Pieterson. 2012. Smart textiles: Challenges and opportunities.Journal of Applied Physics 112, 9 (2012)

  13. [21]

    Coder’s Cafe. 2022. CodersCafeTech/Package-Tracker. Coder’s Cafe

  14. [22]

    De Vito, E

    S. De Vito, E. Massera, M. Piga, L. Martinotto, and G. Di Francia. 2008. On Field Calibration of an Electronic Nose for Benzene Estimation in an Urban Pollution Monitoring Scenario.Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical129, 2 (Feb. 2008), 750–757. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.09.060

  15. [23]

    Priyanka deSouza, Karoline Barkjohn, Andrea Clements, Jenny Lee, Ralph Kahn, Ben Crawford, and Patrick Kinney. 2023. An analysis of degradation in low-cost particulate matter sensors.Environmental science: atmospheres3, 3 (2023), 521–536

  16. [24]

    Asbjørn Djupdal, Magnus Själander, Magnus Jahre, Snorre Aunet, and Trond Ytterdal. 2025. Optimizing Energy Efficiency in Subthreshold RISC-V Cores. arXiv:2502.06588 [cs] doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.06588

  17. [25]

    Lieven Eeckhout. 2024. FOCAL: A First-Order Carbon Model to Assess Processor Sustainability. InProceedings of the 29th ACM Inter- national Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Lan- guages and Operating Systems, Volume 2 (ASPLOS ’24, Vol. 2). As- sociation for Co...

  18. [26]

    Lieven Eeckhout. 2024. Rip geomean speedup use equal-work (or equal-time) harmonic mean speedup instead.IEEE Computer Archi- tecture Letters23, 1 (2024), 78–82

  19. [27]

    eeNews. 2025. How much ‘Moore’ do we need? New technologies for the extreme edge! [Online]. Available: https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/how-much-moore-do-we- 12 need-new-technologies-for-the-extreme-edge/

  20. [28]

    Mariam Elgamal, Doug Carmean, Elnaz Ansari, Okay Zed, Ramesh Peri, Srilatha Manne, Udit Gupta, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, Gage Hills, and Carole-Jean Wu. 2025. CORDOBA: Carbon-Efficient Opti- mization Framework for Computing Systems. In2025 IEEE Interna- tional Symposium on Hi...

  21. [29]

    2014.Using radio frequency identification (RFID) for moni- toring trees in the forest: State-of-the-technology investigation

    Rey Farve. 2014.Using radio frequency identification (RFID) for moni- toring trees in the forest: State-of-the-technology investigation. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Technol- ogy

  22. [30]

    2014.Using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for Monitoring Trees in the Forest: State-of-the-technology Investigation

    Rey Farve. 2014.Using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for Monitoring Trees in the Forest: State-of-the-technology Investigation. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Technology

  23. [31]

    Ahmet Feyzioglu and Yavuz Selim Taspinar. 2023. Beef Quality Classification with Reduced E-Nose Data Features According to Beef Cut Types.Sensors23, 4 (Jan. 2023), 2222. doi:10.3390/s23042222

  24. [32]

    Carloni, and Kenneth Shepard

    Yatin Gilhotra, Henry Overhauser, Heyu Yin, Eric Pollmann, Guy Eichler, Andrew Cheng, Taesung Jung, Nanyu Zeng, Luca P. Carloni, and Kenneth Shepard. 2024. A Wireless Subdural Optical Cortical Interface Device with 768 Co-Packaged Micro-LEDs for Fluorescence Imaging and Optoge...

  25. [33]

    Government of India. 2022. Open Government Data (OGD) Platform India. https://data.gov.in

  26. [34]

    Danielle Grey-Stewart, David Kong, Mariam Elgamal, Georgios Kyr- iazidis, Jalil Morris, and Gage Hills. 2025. Quantifying Trade-Offs in Power, Performance, Area, and Total Carbon Footprint of Future Three-Dimensional Integrated Computing Systems. In2025 Design, Automation & Te...

  27. [35]

    Lee, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu

    Udit Gupta, Mariam Elgamal, Gage Hills, Gu-Yeon Wei, Hsien-Hsin S. Lee, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu. 2022. ACT: Designing Sustainable Computer Systems with an Architectural Carbon Mod- eling Tool. InProceedings of the 49th Annual International Sympo- sium on Computer Arch...

  28. [36]

    Lee, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu

    Udit Gupta, Young Geun Kim, Sylvia Lee, Jordan Tse, Hsien-Hsin S. Lee, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks, and Carole-Jean Wu. 2021. Chas- ing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA)...

  29. [37]

    Tom Hackenberg. 2022. MCU prices to remain higher for sev- eral years – Microcontroler (MCU) Quarterly Market Monitor. https://www.yolegroup.com/strategy-insights/mcu-prices-to- remain-higher-for-several-years-microcontroler-mcu-quarterly- market-monitor/

  30. [38]

    Ramsey Hamade, Raghid Al Ayache, Makram Bou Ghanem, Sleiman El Masri, and Ali Ammouri. 2020. Life Cycle Analysis of AA Alkaline Batteries.Procedia Manufacturing43 (Jan. 2020), 415–422. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.193

  31. [39]

    1986.The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks

    Robert E Hardenburg, Alley E Watada, and Chien Yi Wang. 1986.The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. Number 66. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service

  32. [40]

    Mark Hempstead, Nikhil Tripathi, Patrick Mauro, Gu-Yeon Wei, and David Brooks. 2005. An ultra low power system architecture for sensor network applications. In32nd International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA’05). IEEE, 208–219

  33. [41]

    Hilty and Bernard Aebischer

    Lorenz M. Hilty and Bernard Aebischer. 2015. ICT for Sustainability: An Emerging Research Field. InICT Innovations for Sustainability, Lorenz M. Hilty and Bernard Aebischer (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–36. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1

  34. [42]

    Mark A. J. Huijbregts, Zoran J. N. Steinmann, Pieter M. F. Elshout, Gea Stam, Francesca Verones, Marisa Vieira, Michiel Zijp, Anne Hollander, and Rosalie van Zelm. 2017. ReCiPe2016: A Harmonised Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Midpoint and Endpoint Level.The Internation...

  35. [43]

    IC Insights. 2022. Microcontrollers Get a Lift from Automotive After 2021 Rebound.https://www.icinsights.com/news/bulletins/ microcontrollers-get-a-lift-from-automotive-after-2021-rebound/. Cites 2021 average selling price (ASP) of MCUs as $0.64, based on the Q1 Update to the ...

  36. [44]

    Fortune Business Insights. 2025. Smart Clothing Market Size. [On- line]. Available:https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/smart- clothing-market-104648

  37. [45]

    Fortune Business Insights. 2025. Wound Care Devices Market Size. [Online]. Available:https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/ industry-reports/wound-care-devices-market-100388

  38. [46]

    Stanley Jevons

    W. Stanley Jevons. 1998. The Coal Question. InThe Economics of Population. Routledge

  39. [47]

    Yuanwen Jiang, Artem A Trotsyuk, and Zhenan Bao. 2023. Heal- ing chronic wounds with a wireless smart bandage with integrated sensors and stimulators. 622–623 pages

  40. [48]

    Antoine Jonquais and Florian Krempl. 2019. Predicting shipping time with machine learning. (2019)

  41. [49]

    Aydin Kaya, Ali Seydi Keçeli, Cagatay Catal, and Bedir Tekiner- dogan. 2020. Sensor Failure Tolerable Machine Learning-Based Food Quality Prediction Model.Sensors20, 11 (Jan. 2020), 3173. doi:10.3390/s20113173

  42. [50]

    Shadman Khan, Zeinab Hosseinidoust, Yingfu Li, Carlos DM Filipe, and Tohid F Didar. 2024. Smart food packaging commercialization. Nature Reviews Bioengineering(2024), 1–3

  43. [51]

    Joshua Kim, En-Fan Chou, Jamie Le, Sabrina Wong, Michael Chu, and Michelle Khine. 2019. Soft wearable pressure sensors for beat- to-beat blood pressure monitoring.Advanced healthcare materials8, 13 (2019), 1900109

  44. [52]

    Olof Kindgren. 2025. Olofk/Serv: SERV - The SErial RISC-V CPU. https://github.com/olofk/serv

  45. [53]

    Chrysanthis, and Alex K

    Donald Kline, Nikolas Parshook, Xiaoyu Ge, Erik Brunvand, Rami Melhem, Panos K. Chrysanthis, and Alex K. Jones. 2019. GreenChip: A Tool for Evaluating Holistic Sustainability of Modern Computing Systems.Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems22 (June 2019), 322–332. doi...

  46. [54]

    Erik Klint, Gregory Peters, and Lars-Olof Johansson. 2024. Pro- Environmental Behaviour Is Undermined by Disgust Sensitivity: The Case of Excessive Laundering.PLOS ONE19, 6 (June 2024), e0302625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302625

  47. [55]

    David Kong, Shvetank Prakash, Jedrzej Kufel, Georgios Kyriazidis, Yasmine Omri, David Verity, Emre Ozer, Vijay Janapa Reddi, and Gage Hills. 2025. 333-eDRAM – 3T Embedded DRAM Leveraging Monolithic 3D Integration of 3 Transistor Types: IGZO, Carbon Nan- otube and Silicon FETs....

  48. [56]

    Kumar and B

    K. Kumar and B. P. Pande. 2023. Air Pollution Prediction with Ma- chine Learning: A Case Study of Indian Cities.International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology20, 5 (May 2023), 5333–5348. doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04241-5

  49. [57]

    Manoj Kumar and Avinash Puri. 2012. A Review of Permissible Limits of Drinking Water.Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine16, 1 (2012), 40–44. doi:10.4103/0019-5278.99696

  50. [58]

    Kirsi Laitala and Ingun Grimstad Klepp. 2020. What affects garment lifespans? International clothing practices based on a wardrobe sur- vey in China, Germany, Japan, the UK, and the USA.Sustainability 12, 21 (2020), 9151. 13

  51. [59]

    Emily Laver. 2024. Solid State Battery Life Cycle Analysis: Comparing CO2 Impact of Incumbent Li-Ion Chemistries vs. Emergent Solid State Technology

  52. [60]

    Baolin Li, Rohan Basu Roy, Daniel Wang, Siddharth Samsi, Vijay Gadepally, and Devesh Tiwari. 2023. Toward Sustainable HPC: Car- bon Footprint Estimation and Environmental Implications of HPC Systems. InProceedings of the International Conference for High Per- formance Computin...

  53. [61]

    Hendriks, Gregory Y.H

    Dominik Linz, Monika Gawalko, Konstanze Betz, Jeroen M. Hendriks, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Nicklas Vinter, Yutao Guo, and Søren Johnsen. 2024. Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Screening and Digital Health.The Lancet Regional Health - Europe37 (Feb. 2024), 100786. doi:10.1016/j. lan...

  54. [62]

    Jaqueline Litardo, David Gomez, Andrea Boero, Ruben Hidalgo-Leon, Guillermo Soriano, and Angel D Ramirez. 2023. Air-conditioning life cycle assessment research: a review of the methodology, envi- ronmental impacts, and areas of future improvement.Energy and Buildings296 (2023), 113415

  55. [63]

    Brandon Lucia, Vignesh Balaji, Alexei Colin, Kiwan Maeng, and Emily Ruppel. 2017. Intermittent computing: Challenges and opportunities. 2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages (SNAPL 2017) (2017), 8–1

  56. [64]

    Markets and Markets. 2024. Environmental Monitoring Market Size. [Online]. Available:https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market- Reports/environmental-monitoring-market-216846315.html

  57. [65]

    Markets and Markets. 2024. Smart Agriculture Market Size. [Online]. Available:https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ smart-agriculture-market-239736790.html

  58. [66]

    Ross E Mitchell and Travas A Young. 2023. How Many People Use Sign Language? A National Health Survey-Based Estimate.The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education28, 1 (Jan. 2023), 1–6. doi:10.1093/deafed/enac031

  59. [67]

    Arias, and Jan M

    Ali Moin, Andy Zhou, Abbas Rahimi, Alisha Menon, Simone Benatti, George Alexandrov, Senam Tamakloe, Jonathan Ting, Natasha Ya- mamoto, Yasser Khan, Fred Burghardt, Luca Benini, Ana C. Arias, and Jan M. Rabaey. 2021. A Wearable Biosensing System with In-Sensor Adaptive Machine ...

  60. [68]

    2013.Water for Food Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture

    David Molden. 2013.Water for Food Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Routledge

  61. [69]

    Pooria Mostafalu, William Lenk, Mehmet R Dokmeci, Babak Ziaie, Ali Khademhosseini, and Sameer R Sonkusale. 2015. Wireless flexible smart bandage for continuous monitoring of wound oxygenation. IEEE Transactions on biomedical circuits and systems9, 5 (2015), 670– 677

  62. [70]

    Muhammad Husnain Mubarik, Dennis D Weller, Nathaniel Bleier, Matthew Tomei, Jasmin Aghassi-Hagmann, Mehdi B Tahoori, and Rakesh Kumar. 2020. Printed machine learning classifiers. In2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO). IEEE, 73–87

  63. [71]

    Arokia Nathan, Arman Ahnood, Matthew T. Cole, Sungsik Lee, Yuji Suzuki, Pritesh Hiralal, Francesco Bonaccorso, Tawfique Hasan, Luis Garcia-Gancedo, Andriy Dyadyusha, Samiul Haque, Piers Andrew, Stephan Hofmann, James Moultrie, Daping Chu, Andrew J. Fle- witt, Andrea C. Ferrari...

  64. [72]

    United Nations. 2018. 2018 Revision of World Urbaniza- tion Prospects. https://www.un.org/en/desa/2018-revision-world- urbanization-prospects

  65. [73]

    Emre Ozer, Jedrzej Kufel, John Biggs, Gavin Brown, James Myers, Anjit Rana, Antony Sou, and Catherine Ramsdale. 2019. Bespoke Ma- chine Learning Processor Development Framework on Flexible Sub- strates. In2019 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and...

  66. [74]

    Emre Ozer, Jedrzej Kufel, John Biggs, James Myers, Charles Reynolds, Gavin Brown, Anjit Rana, Antony Sou, Catherine Ramsdale, and Scott White. 2020. Binary Neural Network as a Flexible Integrated Circuit for Odour Classification. In2020 IEEE International Conference on Flexibl...

  67. [75]

    Emre Ozer, Jedrzej Kufel, John Biggs, Anjit Rana, Francisco J Ro- driguez, Thomas Lee-Clark, Antony Sou, Catherine Ramsdale, Scott White, Suresh Kumar Garlapati, et al . 2023. Malodour classifica- tion with low-cost flexible electronics.Nature Communications14, 1 (2023), 777

  68. [77]

    Emre Ozer, Jedrzej Kufel, Shvetank Prakash, Alireza Raisiardali, Olof Kindgren, Ronald Wong, Nelson Ng, Damien Jausseran, Feras Alkhalil, David Kong, et al. 2024. Bendable non-silicon RISC-V mi- croprocessor.Nature634, 8033 (2024), 341–346

  69. [78]

    Emre Ozer, Jedrzej Kufel, Elena Punskaya, Igor Drokov, Ari Ercole, Hiral Radia, Thom Smith, John Biggs, Francisco Rodriguez, Grace Aligada, and Adam Rearden. 2024. A Custom-designed Atrial Fib- rillation Detection hardware on a Flexible Substrate. In2024 IEEE International Con...

  70. [79]

    Harshil Patel. 2020. INTELLIGENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/harshilpatel355/autoirrigationdata

  71. [80]

    Rylie E. O. Pelton, Clare E. Kazanski, Shamitha Keerthi, Kelly A. Racette, Sasha Gennet, Nathaniel Springer, Eugene Yacobson, Michael Wironen, Deepak Ray, Kris Johnson, and Jennifer Schmitt. 2024. Greenhouse Gas Emissions in US Beef Production Can Be Reduced by up to 30% with ...

  72. [81]

    PhysioNet. 2000. MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database.https:// physionet.org/content/afdb/1.0.0

  73. [82]

    Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, and Karen E Robinson. 2016. Project Jacquard: interactive digital textiles at scale. InProceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 4216–4227

  74. [83]

    Pragmatic Semiconductor. 2023. Advancing semiconductor sus- tainability.https://www.pragmaticsemi.com/app/uploads/2023/07/ Pragmatic-Report-Advancing-semiconductor-sustainability.pdf

  75. [84]

    Pragmatic Semiconductor. 2025. FlexIC Platform Gen3.https:// www.pragmaticsemi.com/foundry/flexic-platform-gen-3. [Online]. Available:https://www.pragmaticsemi.com/foundry/flexic-platform- gen-3

  76. [85]

    Green, Pete Warden, Tim Ansell, and Vijay Janapa Reddi

    Shvetank Prakash, Tim Callahan, Joseph Bushagour, Colby Banbury, Alan V. Green, Pete Warden, Tim Ansell, and Vijay Janapa Reddi

  77. [86]

    In2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)

    CFU Playground: Full-Stack Open-Source Framework for Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) Acceleration on FPGAs. In2023 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS). 157–167. doi:10.1109/ISPASS57527.2023.00024

  78. [87]

    Shvetank Prakash, Matthew Stewart, Colby Banbury, Mark Mazumder, Pete Warden, Brian Plancher, and Vijay Janapa Reddi

  79. [88]

    ACM66, 11 (2023), 68–77

    Is TinyML Sustainable?Commun. ACM66, 11 (2023), 68–77

  80. [89]

    PRé Sustainability. 2025. SimaPro - Sustainability Insights for In- formed Changemakers. https://simapro.com/. 14

  81. [90]

    Alireza Raisiardali, Konstantinos Iordanou, Jedrzej Kufel, Kowshik Gudimetla, Kris Myny, and Emre Ozer. 2025. Flexing RISC-V In- struction Subset Processors (RISPs) to Extreme Edge.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04567(2025)

  82. [91]

    Read, Lindsay Carr, Laura De Cicco, Hilary A

    Emily K. Read, Lindsay Carr, Laura De Cicco, Hilary A. Dugan, Paul C. Hanson, Julia A. Hart, James Kreft, Jordan S. Read, and Luke A. Winslow. 2017. Water Quality Data for National-Scale Aquatic Re- search: The Water Quality Portal.Water Resources Research53, 2 (2017), 1735–17...

  83. [92]

    Allied Market Research. 2022. FMCG Market Expected to Reach $18,939.4 Billion by 2031. [Online]. Available:https://www. alliedmarketresearch.com/press-release/fmcg-market.html

  84. [93]

    Grand View Research. 2025. Ingestible Sensors Market Size. [Online]. Available:https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ ingestible-sensors-market

  85. [94]

    Straits Research. 2025. Active Implantable Medical Devices Market Size. [Online]. Available:https://straitsresearch.com/report/active- implantable-medical-devices-market

  86. [95]

    Transparency Market Research. 2025. Smart Patches Market. [Online]. Available:https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/ smart-patches-market.html

  87. [96]

    Cornell, Jonathan F

    Katherine Richardson, Will Steffen, Wolfgang Lucht, Jørgen Bendt- sen, Sarah E. Cornell, Jonathan F. Donges, Markus Drüke, Ingo Fet- zer, Govindasamy Bala, Werner von Bloh, Georg Feulner, Stephanie Fiedler, Dieter Gerten, Tom Gleeson, Matthias Hofmann, Willem Huiskamp, Matti K...

  88. [97]

    RISC-V International. 2025. RISC-V GNU Compiler Toolchain. https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain

  89. [98]

    RISC-V International. 2025. Spike RISC-V ISA Simulator. https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-isa-sim

  90. [99]

    Paul Russell and Bill Kipp. 2007. European Express Shipping Drop/Im- pact Study. InProceedings of the IAPRI Symposium in Windsor, Wind- sor, UK. 3–5

  91. [100]

    Pushpendra Kumar Saini. 2024. Air Components Dataset with AQI. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/pushpendrakumarsaini/air- components-dataset-with-aqi

  92. [101]

    Nikolina Sajn. 2019. Environmental Impact of the Textile and Cloth- ing Industry in the EU. (Jan. 2019)

  93. [102]

    Dimitrios Samakovlis, Stefano Albini, Rubén Rodríguez Álvarez, Denisa-Andreea Constantinescu, Pasquale Davide Schiavone, Miguel Peón-Quirós, and David Atienza. 2024. BiomedBench: A Benchmark Suite of TinyML Biomedical Applications for Low-Power Wearables. IEEE Design & Test(20...

  94. [103]

    Rajashekhar B Somasagar and Ashok Kusagur. 2017. Flavor determi- nation for milk quality assessment using embedded electronic noses. In2017 2nd International Conference On Emerging Computation and Information Technologies (ICECIT). IEEE, 1–4

  95. [104]

    Ekta Sonwani, Urvashi Bansal, Roobaea Alroobaea, Abdullah M Baqasah, and Mustapha Hedabou. 2022. An artificial intelligence approach toward food spoilage detection and analysis.Frontiers in Public Health9 (2022), 816226

  96. [105]

    term” pregnancy: recommenda- tions from the Defining “Term

    Catherine Y Spong. 2013. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommenda- tions from the Defining “Term” Pregnancy Workgroup.Jama309, 23 (2013), 2445–2446

  97. [106]

    Statista. 2024. Total Production of Beef in the U.S. 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/194687/us-total-beef- production-since-2000/

  98. [107]

    Youness Tace, Mohamed Tabaa, Sanaa Elfilali, Cherkaoui Leghris, Hassna Bensag, and Eric Renault. 2022. Smart Irrigation System Based on IoT and Machine Learning.Energy Reports8 (Nov. 2022), 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.088

  99. [108]

    The FOSSi Foundation. 2025. Embench/Embench-Iot. Embench

  100. [109]

    Arya Tschand, Arun Tejusve Raghunath Rajan, Sachin Idgunji, Anir- ban Ghosh, Jeremy Holleman, Csaba Kiraly, Pawan Ambalkar, Ritika Borkar, Ramesh Chukka, Trevor Cockrell, et al. 2025. MLPerf Power: Benchmarking the Energy Efficiency of Machine Learning Systems from 𝜇Watts to M...

  101. [110]

    United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

  102. [111]

    United Nations. 2021. The Sustainable Development Goals Re- port 2021.https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/The-Sustainable- Development-Goals-Report-2021.pdf

  103. [112]

    US Energy Information Administration. 2023. US Electricity Profile

  104. [113]

    https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/

  105. [114]

    OAR US EPA. 2016. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Pas- senger Vehicle. https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas- emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle

  106. [115]

    Mike Vanderroost, Peter Ragaert, Frank Devlieghere, and Bruno De Meulenaer. 2014. Intelligent food packaging: The next generation. Trends in food science & technology39, 1 (2014), 47–62

  107. [116]

    Patterson, and Krste Asanovic

    Andrew Waterman, Yunsup Lee, David A. Patterson, and Krste Asanovic. 2014. The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume I: User- level ISA, Version 2.0.EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Tech. Rep. UCB/EECS-2014-54(2014), 4

  108. [117]

    Watson-Parris, Y

    D. Watson-Parris, Y. Rao, D. Olivié, Ø. Seland, P. Nowack, G. Camps- Valls, P. Stier, S. Bouabid, M. Dewey, E. Fons, J. Gonzalez, P. Harder, K. Jeggle, J. Lenhardt, P. Manshausen, M. Novitasari, L. Ricard, and C. Roesch. 2022. ClimateBench v1.0: A Benchmark for Data-Driven Cli...

  109. [118]

    Mark Weiser. 1999. The computer for the 21st century.ACM SIG- MOBILE mobile computing and communications review3, 3 (1999), 3–11

  110. [119]

    Gregor Wernet, Christian Bauer, Bernhard Steubing, Jürgen Reinhard, Emilia Moreno-Ruiz, and Bo Weidema. 2016. The Ecoinvent Database Version 3 (Part I): Overview and Methodology.The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment21, 9 (Sept. 2016), 1218–1230. doi:10. 1007/s1136...

  111. [120]

    Dedy Rahman Wijaya, Riyanarto Sarno, Enny Zulaika, and Farah Afianti. 2022. Electronic Nose Homogeneous Data Sets for Beef Quality Classification and Microbial Population Prediction.BMC Research Notes15, 1 (July 2022), 237. doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06126-9

  112. [121]

    Stephen Williams and Michael Baxter. 2002. Icarus verilog: open- source verilog more than a year later.Linux Journal2002, 99 (2002), 3

  113. [122]

    Ryan Wiser, Eric Lantz, Trieu Mai, Jose Zayas, Edgar DeMeo, Ed Eugeni, Jessica Lin-Powers, and Richard Tusing. 2015. Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States.The Electricity Journal28, 9 (2015), 120–132

  114. [123]

    Christopher Yeh, Chenlin Meng, Sherrie Wang, Anne Driscoll, Erik Rozi, Patrick Liu, Jihyeon Lee, Marshall Burke, David Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. 2021. SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learning. InThirty- fifth Conference o...

  115. [124]

    YosysHQ. 2025. YosysHQ/Picorv32. Yosys Headquarters

  116. [125]

    Approximate Pair Presence Tracking

    Hanie Yousefi, Hsuan-Ming Su, Sara M Imani, Kais Alkhaldi, Carlos D M. Filipe, and Tohid F Didar. 2019. Intelligent food packaging: A review of smart sensing technologies for monitoring food quality. ACS sensors4, 4 (2019), 808–821. 15 AFlexiBenchFurther Details In this sectio...

  117. [126]

    all cores are equal,

    and implements a k-nearest-neighbors (KNN) model to control soil pump activation. The model uses soil tem- perature and moisture readings as inputs, and outputs a prediction whether or not to activate soil pumps. Dataset:This workload’s reference dataset comes from [78], which...

Pith tools

Reviewed May 18, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.