Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 21 references

Two-dimensional materials as a multiproperty sensing platform

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Atomic stacks can sense strain, light, spin, and gases simultaneously

desk verdict A broad and visually rich review of 2D-materials sensing that overclaims its 'multiproperty' framing: the surveyed devices are mostly single-quantity sensors, and one headline number is misattributed. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08259 v1 pith:NN3WQ7OA submitted 2025-09-10 cond-mat.mes-hall

Dipankar Jana , Shubhrasish Mukherjee , Dmitrii Litvinov , Magdalena Grzeszczyk , Sergey Grebenchuk , Makars~Šiškins , Virgil Gavriliuc , Yihang Ouyang
show 4 more authors
Changyi Chen Yuxuan Ye Yiming Meng Maciej Koperski
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords two-dimensionalmaterialsvanderWaalsheterostructuresmultipropertysensingnanomechanicalresonatorsquantumemittersmagneticproximityeffectchemosensingtwistingmicroscope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that van der Waals heterostructures—stacks of atomically thin layers held together by weak interlayer forces—form a distinct sensing platform because their mechanical, optical, electronic, and magnetic responses are deeply intertwined. The review assembles evidence that atomically thin layers respond to many external stimuli at once, with sensitivities that reach new marks: sub-zeptogram mass resolution, femtowatt optical power, single-molecule gas detection, and an effective magnetic exchange field near 20 T sensed optically without an applied field. If the case holds, sensing devices need not pair a separate transducer material with every quantity of interest; the same few-atom stack could report on strain, fields, light, chemical environment, and magnetic order. The paper frames this as the basis for a new sensing methodology, not merely incremental improvement.

What carries the argument

The central object is the van der Waals heterostructure with atomically flat interfaces. Its multiproperty character comes from combining sub-nm thickness (which exposes nearly every atom to the environment), extreme mechanical flexibility, strong excitonic light–matter coupling, proximity-induced exchange fields, and tunable band alignment. This single platform carries the argument by letting one material system convert several different externalities into optical, electrical, and mechanical readouts at the same time.

What would settle it

A direct check: have an independent group measure the mass resolution of a suspended Ti3C2Tx MXene resonator and the effective exchange field in a CrI3/WSe2 heterostructure. If the mass noise floor is orders of magnitude above 0.2 zeptograms, or the valley splitting does not correspond to ~20 T, the claim of uniquely high multiproperty sensitivity loses its strongest quantitative anchors.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the atomic thickness of 2D materials puts essentially all electronic and spin states at the surface, while van der Waals assembly lets any combination of materials sit a fraction of a nanometer apart without lattice matching. As a result, changes in one property—magnetic order, dielectric environment, adsorbed molecules, applied strain—show up in several observables at once: exciton energy and polarization, single-photon emitter spectra, mechanical resonance frequency and damping, or transistor conductance. The paper catalogs five sensing modalities built on this intertwining: optoelectronic sensing of magnetic and correlated states, quantum-defect sensors at true s

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the highlighted benchmark results—0.2 zeptogram mass resolution, ~20 T effective exchange field, 43–54 meV nm/V Stark shifts, and the nanomechanical spin-texture signatures—are accurate and reproducible in other laboratories, since the review itself reports no new measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single suspended atomic membrane could report a magnetic phase transition, a strain change, and an adsorbed molecule simultaneously through its resonance frequency, damping, and optical response.
  • Quantum defects in hBN, placed directly on a target surface, could map magnetic fields, temperature, pressure, and local charge with nanoscale resolution, without the depth limit of diamond nitrogen-vacancy centers.
  • The quantum twisting microscope turns twist angle into a continuous control knob, so one sample can map an entire moiré phase diagram instead of requiring many separately fabricated devices.
  • Ultrasensitive chemical detection at low material loading makes self-powered, wearable, and even bioabsorbable sensor arrays feasible at minimal environmental cost.
  • Nanomechanical readout of quantum capacitance offers a noninvasive route to density-of-states measurements in simpler device geometries than conventional transport.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the intertwined coupling is as general as the review suggests, then the same membrane that senses a phase transition should also be able to actuate it: strain from the resonator could tune correlated or magnetic states—a feedback loop the paper leaves as an open question.
  • The review's case implies a design rule for future sensors: choose heterostructure combinations that maximize cross-coupling (for example, magnetic proximity plus exciton response) rather than optimizing one sensitivity parameter alone; this could be tested by comparing multiproperty readouts from the same flake.
  • Independent reproduction of the headline benchmarks—0.2 zeptogram MXene mass resolution, the ~20 T effective exchange field, and the 43–54 meV nm/V Stark shifts—would be the fastest way to convert this programmatic claim into an engineering one.
  • A quantitative figure of merit for multiproperty sensing, such as the number of independent externalities detected per unit material volume with simultaneous readout, does not yet exist; defining one would help settle whether 2D platforms truly outperform decoupled conventional sensor arrays.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review of sensing applications of two-dimensional (2D) materials, organized into five areas: optoelectronic/excitonic probes of magnetic and electronic phases (Section I), quantum defects and single-photon emitters (Section II), integration of 2D materials onto scanning probes including the quantum twisting microscope (Section III), nanomechanical membrane resonators (Section IV), and bio-/chemosensing (Section V). The stated thesis is that van der Waals heterostructures with atomically flat interfaces combine mechanical, chemical, optoelectronic, and magnetic functionality, and that this constitutes a foundation for multiproperty sensing, with the abstract explicitly claiming 'simultaneous responses to multiple distinct externalities.' The paper catalogues a broad set of single-quantity sensing demonstrations, frames them as evidence for a unified sensing platform, and closes with an outlook that acknowledges practical realizations 'remain at an early stage.' The review offers no new experimental data.

Significance. If the central thesis were fully supported, the review would be a valuable synthesis of a rapidly growing field. Its strengths are breadth, organization, and a clear enumeration of challenges in each subfield, including a useful summary of open problems in quantum-defect fabrication, scanning-probe scaling, and nanomechanical readout. The paper also gives appropriate credit to the quantum twisting microscope as a conceptually new measurement methodology. However, the reviewed evidence supports a portfolio of high-performance single-property sensors rather than a demonstrated simultaneous multiproperty sensing platform. The review is therefore best read as a roadmap for future multiproperty integration, not as a validation of the strong claims in the abstract and introduction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction/Summary] The central claim of 'simultaneous responses to multiple distinct externalities' and a demonstrated 'multiproperty sensing platform' is not supported by the body of the review. In Sections I-V, the cited experiments are single-modality: exciton probes report magnetic order (Sec. I), hBN defects report one quantity per measurement (Sec. II), the QTM reports twist-angle-dependent electronic structure (Sec. III), nanodrums report strain, mass, or a phase transition (Sec. IV), and chemosensors report gas or biomolecule concentration (Sec. V). No reviewed device simultaneously measures two or more distinct external stimuli with calibrated cross-talk. The Summary itself concedes 'example practical realizations remain at an early stage.' This is an internal-coherence issue between the abstract's unqualified language and the body's content. Please either cite a concrete simultaneous multi-parame
  2. [Section I, paragraph on WSe2/CrI3 proximity] The statement 'An effective magnetic exchange field of approximately 20 T was reported in such systems, inferred from the observed valley polarization and Zeeman splitting of excitons' is cited to Ref. 28 (Seyler et al., Nature Physics 2018). Ref. 28 reports ligand-field helical luminescence of CrI3 itself, not a WSe2/CrI3 proximity measurement. The WSe2/CrI3 magnetic proximity experiment with the derived effective exchange field is reported in Ref. 33 (Zhong et al., Nature Nanotechnology 2020). The citation should be corrected, and the value should be described as an inferred effective field rather than a directly measured magnetic field.
  3. [Sections I, II, IV (headline sensitivity values)] The review presents several headline sensor benchmarks at face value: the ~20 T proximity field (Sec. I), the Stark tunability values of 54 and 43 meV nm/V (Sec. II), and the sub-zeptogram mass resolution from MXene resonators (Sec. IV). Since the abstract claims 'highest sensitivity,' these numbers need context regarding measurement conditions, error bars, and whether they are single-group reports with independent reproducibility. Without such critical assessment, the claim of uniquely high sensitivity rests on uncorroborated literature values. This is a load-bearing evidentiary gap for one of the paper's central assertions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: 'scanning probe centilevers' should be 'scanning probe cantilevers.'
  2. [Fig. 3(a) caption and Section II] The text quotes Stark tunabilities of 54 and 43 meV nm/V, while the Fig. 3(a) caption reports a tuning efficiency of 137 µeV/V. The relation between these numbers depends on the assumed electric-field inhomogeneity or layer thickness; please define the effective field convention so readers can compare values.
  3. [Section I] The notation 'K+ and K− valleys' is nonstandard; use K and K′ (or K and -K) valleys for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No derivation-level circularity: the paper is a synthetic review whose central claim does not reduce to its cited inputs.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation. The central claim—that van der Waals heterostructures form a foundation for multiproperty sensing—is presented as a synthesis of existing experimental and theoretical work, with no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems that could reduce to their own inputs. The many self-citations (e.g., Refs. 25, 29–32, 34, 54, 55, 112, 114, 118, 124, 125) are each used to support a specific, externally checkable experimental result or to illustrate a sensing modality; none is invoked as a load-bearing premise that forbids alternatives or as the sole justification for the multiproperty-sensing framing. The paper itself flags its own limitations: the Summary states that ‘example practical realizations remain at an early stage,’ and Section II notes that the exact atomic structure of active defects ‘remains a matter of speculation.’ These admissions weaken the strength of the broadest claims, but they are evidentiary/coherence concerns rather than circularity. The reviewer’s observation that the surveyed demonstrations are mostly single-quantity sensors is a fair criticism of the strength of the synthesis, but it does not amount to a circular derivation: the review does not define ‘multiproperty sensing’ in terms of a specific predicted quantity, nor does it present any fitted input as an independent prediction. No circular step can be exhibited, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities, parameters, or derivations. It is a review, so its contribution is organizational and interpretive.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited experimental results are accurately reported in the source papers.
    The review's statements about sensitivity, detection limits, and physical mechanisms are based on references such as Refs. 25, 40, 66, 103, 119. The authors do not re-measure or verify these numbers.
  • domain assumption The literature selection is representative of the field.
    The review chooses examples from a large literature; a different selection could change the emphasis. Heavy self-citation (at least 15 references from the corresponding author's group) may bias the selection.
  • domain assumption The physical mechanisms invoked are correctly described.
    Mechanisms such as excitonic sensing, magnetostriction, proximity exchange, and charge transfer are standard in the field, but the review does not re-derive them; it assumes the reader accepts the cited theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional materials as a multiproperty sensing platform." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NN3WQ7OA

@misc{pith2026250908259,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional materials as a multiproperty sensing platform},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NN3WQ7OA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08259}
}
read the original abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have disrupted materials science due to the development of van der Waals technology. It enables the stacking of ultrathin layers of materials characterized by vastly different electronic structures to create man-made heterostructures and devices with rationally tailored properties, circumventing limitations of matching crystal structures, lattice constants, and geometry of constituent materials and supporting substrates. 2D materials exhibit extraordinary mechanical flexibility, strong light-matter interactions driven by their excitonic response, single photon emission from atomic centers, stable ferromagnetism in sub-nm thin films, fractional quantum Hall effect in high-quality devices, and chemoselectivity at ultrahigh surface-to-volume ratio. Consequently, van der Waals heterostructures with atomically flat interfaces demonstrate an unprecedented degree of intertwined mechanical, chemical, optoelectronic, and magnetic properties. This constitutes a foundation for multiproperty sensing, based on complex intra- and intermaterial interactions, and a robust response to external stimuli originating from the environment. Here, we review recent progress in the development of sensing applications with 2D materials, highlighting the areas where van der Waals heterostructures offer the highest sensitivity, simultaneous responses to multiple distinct externalities due to their atomic thickness in conjunction with unique material combinations, and conceptually new sensing methodology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08259 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a,b). 25 The energy of the exciton as a function of external magnetic field enables the prediction of the critical field for different magnetic phase transitions of the material. The spin-allowed localized excitons also exhibit clear signatures of the underlying magnetic order, making them highly sensitive probes of magnetic states. Changes in magnetic ordering directly influence the bandgap and exciton binding ene… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    39 Hryhoriy Polshyn, Haoxin Zhou, EM Spanton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, and Andrea F Young

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2868-6. 39 Hryhoriy Polshyn, Haoxin Zhou, EM Spanton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, and Andrea F Young. Quantitative transport measurements of fractional quan- tum hall energy gaps in edgeless graphene devices. Physical Review Letters, 121(22):226801, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.226801. 40...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2868-6 2018

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.67

    ISSN 1748-3395. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.67. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.67. 42 Ajit Srivastava, Meinrad Sidler, Adrien V. Allain, Do- minik S. Lembke, Andras Kis, and A. Imamoğlu. Op- tically active quantum dots in monolayer wse2.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(6):491–496, Jun 2015. ISSN 1748-

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.67 2015

  3. [15]

    URLhttp://dx

    doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6. 133 Stefan Blien, Patrick Steger, Niklas Hüttner, Richard Graaf, and Andreas K. Hüttel. Quantum capacitance mediated carbon nanotube optomechanics.Nature Com- munications, 11(1), April 2020. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15433-3. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-...

    doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0341-6 2020

  4. [17]

    URLhttp://dx

    doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58981-2. URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58981-2. 138 Myungchul Oh, Kevin P. Nuckolls, Dillon Wong, Ryan L. Lee, Xiaomeng Liu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Ali Yazdani. Evidence for unconventional super- conductivity in twisted bilayer graphene.Nature, 600 (7888):240–245, October 2021. ISSN 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58981-2 2021

  5. [18]

    URLhttp://dx.doi

    doi:10.1038/ncomms14408. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncomms14408. 142 Ke Ma, Wei Xie, Wei Liu, Lei Wang, Dong Wang, and Ben Zhong Tang. Graphene oxide based fluorescent dna aptasensor for liver cancer diagnosis and therapy. Advanced Functional Materials, 31(36):2102645, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102645. URL https://advanced.onlinelibrary...

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14408 2021

  6. [20]

    149 Yanhong Guo, Zhaoyu Li, Ning An, Yongzheng Guo, Yuchen Wang, Yusen Yuan, Hao Zhang, Teng Tan, Caihao Wu, Bo Peng, Giancarlo Soavi, Yunjiang Rao, and Baicheng Yao

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004827. 149 Yanhong Guo, Zhaoyu Li, Ning An, Yongzheng Guo, Yuchen Wang, Yusen Yuan, Hao Zhang, Teng Tan, Caihao Wu, Bo Peng, Giancarlo Soavi, Yunjiang Rao, and Baicheng Yao. A monolithic graphene- functionalized microlaser for multispecies gas de- tection.Advanced Materials, 34(51):2207777, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10...

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [851]

    URLhttps://doi

    doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09015. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1021/acsnano.0c09015. 165 Radha Bhardwaj and Arnab Hazra. Mxene-based gas sensors.Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 9(44):15735– 15754, 2021. ISSN 2050-7526. doi:10.1039/D1TC04085E. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC04085E. 166 Eunji Lee, Armin VahidMohammadi, Barton C. Pro- rok, Young Soo Yoon, Majid Beida...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c09015 2021

  8. [1723]

    URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13893-w

    doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13893-w. URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13893-w. 14 F Javier García de Abajo, DN Basov, Frank HL Koppens, Lorenzo Orsini, Matteo Ceccanti, Se- bastián Castilla, Lorenzo Cavicchi, Marco Polini, PAD Gonçalves, AT Costa, et al. Roadmap for photonics with 2d materials.ACS Photonics, 2025. doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.5c00353. 15 Mag...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13893-w 2025

Show all 21 references
  1. [2015]

    URLhttp://dx.doi

    doi:10.1039/C5NR01536G. URLhttp://dx.doi. org/10.1039/C5NR01536G. 8 Ashish Arora, Karol Nogajewski, Maciej Molas, Ma- ciej Koperski, and Marek Potemski. Exciton band structure in layered mose2: from a monolayer to the bulk limit.Nanoscale, 7:20769–20775, 2015. doi: 10.1039/C5N...

    2015 doi

  2. [2017]

    doi:10.1039/c6nr09768e

    ISSN 2040-3372. doi:10.1039/c6nr09768e. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6NR09768E. 135 Changyao Chen, Vikram V. Deshpande, Mikito Koshino, Sunwoo Lee, Alexander Gondarenko, Allan H. MacDon- ald, Philip Kim, and James Hone. Modulation of me- chanical resonance by chemical potent...

    doi

  3. [2019]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0986-9

    ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0986-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0986-9. 37 Yanhao Tang, Lizhong Li, Tingxin Li, Yang Xu, Song Liu, Katayun Barmak, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Allan H MacDonald, Jie Shan, et al. Sim- ulation of hubbard model physics ...

    2020 doi

  4. [2020]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0629-1. 34 Łucja Kipczak, Zhaolong Chen, Magdalena Grzeszczyk, Sergey Grebenchuk, Pengru Huang, Kristina Vaklinova, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Adam Babiński, Ma- ciej Koperski, et al. Interplay between charge trans- fer and magnet...

    2025 doi

  5. [2021]

    27 Amit Pawbake, Thomas Pelini, Ivan Mohelsky, Di- pankar Jana, Ivan Breslavetz, Chang-Woo Cho, Mi- lan Orlita, Marek Potemski, Marie-Aude Measson, Nathan P Wilson, et al

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01070-8. 27 Amit Pawbake, Thomas Pelini, Ivan Mohelsky, Di- pankar Jana, Ivan Breslavetz, Chang-Woo Cho, Mi- lan Orlita, Marek Potemski, Marie-Aude Measson, Nathan P Wilson, et al. Magneto-optical sensing of the pressure driven magnetic g...

    2023 doi

  6. [2022]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02000. 41 M. Koperski, K. Nogajewski, A. Arora, V. Cherkez, P. Mallet, J.-Y. Veuillen, J. Marcus, P. Kossacki, and M. Potemski. Single photon emitters in exfoliated wse2 structures.Nature Nanotechnology, 10(6):503–506, Jun

    doi

  7. [2023]

    20 SL Gnatchenko, IS Kachur, VG Piryatinskaya, Yu M Vysochanskii, and MI Gurzan

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41314-6. 20 SL Gnatchenko, IS Kachur, VG Piryatinskaya, Yu M Vysochanskii, and MI Gurzan. Exciton-magnon structure of the optical absorption spectrum of antiferromagnetic MnPS3.Low Temperature Physics, 37(2):144–148, 2011. URLhttps://doi....

    2011 doi

  8. [2024]

    URLhttps: //www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2401757121

    doi:10.1073/pnas.2401757121. URLhttps: //www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2401757121. 56 Leyi Loh, Junyong Wang, Magdalena Grzeszczyk, Maciej Koperski, and Goki Eda. Towards quantum light-emitting devices based on van der waals materials.Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering,...

    2024

  9. [2025]

    33 Ding Zhong, Kyle L Seyler, Xiayu Linpeng, Nathan P Wilson, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Michael A McGuire, Kai-Mei C Fu, Di Xiao, Wang Yao, et al

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202500562. 33 Ding Zhong, Kyle L Seyler, Xiayu Linpeng, Nathan P Wilson, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Michael A McGuire, Kai-Mei C Fu, Di Xiao, Wang Yao, et al. Layer-resolved magnetic proximity effect in van der waals heterostructures.Na...

    doi

  10. [3118]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0233033

    doi:10.1063/5.0233033. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0233033. 122 Fan Fei, Yulu Mao, Wuzhang Fang, Wenhao Liu, Jack P. Rollins, Aswin L. N. Kondusamy, Bing Lv, Yuan Ping, Ying Wang, and Jun Xiao. Spin-mechanical coupling in 2D antiferromagnet CrSBr.Nano Letters, 24(34): 1046...

    2024 doi

  11. [3395]

    URLhttps://doi

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.60. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nnano.2015.60. 43 Yu-Ming He, Genevieve Clark, John R. Schaibley, Yu He, Ming-Cheng Chen, Yu-Jia Wei, Xing Ding, Qiang Zhang, Wang Yao, Xiaodong Xu, Chao-Yang Lu, and Jian-Wei Pan. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semi...

    2015

  12. [4660]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10

    doi:10.1038/nmat1967. URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/nmat1967. 146 Yaping Dan, Ye Lu, Nicholas J. Kybert, Zhengtang Luo, and A. T. Charlie Johnson. Intrinsic response of graphene vapor sensors.Nano Letters, 9(4):1472–1475, Apr 2009. ISSN 1530-6984. doi:10.1021/nl8033637. URLhttps...

    2009 doi

  13. [6992]

    URLhttp:// dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01845

    doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01845. URLhttp:// dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01845. 21 129 Sudhir Kumar Sahu, Supriya Mandal, Sanat Ghosh, Man- dar M. Deshmukh, and Vibhor Singh. Superconduct- ing vortex-charge measurement using cavity electrome- chanics.Nano Letters, 22(4):...

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.