Treasure Map Toward Skyrmion Evolution in Ambient Conditions: A Perspective from Electronic Instabilities and the Density of Energy

Thao T. Tran; Xudong Huai

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 4 references

Treasure Map Toward Skyrmion Evolution in Ambient Conditions: A Perspective from Electronic Instabilities and the Density of Energy

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A local minimum in the spin density of energy just above the Fermi level measures the energy cost of entering a skyrmion phase, so a routine ground-state calculation can predict the field and temperature a candidate material will need.

desk verdict A plausible heuristic for skyrmion-host screening with new DFT data, but the central quantitative trend rests on a normalization inconsistency and a subjective feature extraction. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08320 v1 pith:YZMNZ4DA submitted 2025-09-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Xudong Huai , Thao T. Tran This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords SkyrmionformationElectronicinstabilityDensityofenergySpinDzyaloshinskii-MoriyainteractionRKKYd-orbitalfillingambient-conditionskyrmions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to give skyrmion research a practical signpost: a number computable from a routine ground-state calculation that tells you how hard a material has to be pushed—how low the temperature, how high the magnetic field—before it will form a skyrmion phase. The number, called Ereq, is read from the spin-resolved density of energy, a band-structure-derived quantity that captures both interatomic and atomic energy contributions separately for spin-up and spin-down electrons. Across fourteen established skyrmion hosts spanning insulating and metallic, d-electron and f-electron, and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya and RKKY stabilized systems, the authors find that Ereq divided by unit-cell volume orders the experimentally observed temperature and field requirements. If true, the same routine calculation becomes a screening tool: compute Ereq/Å3 for an untested compound and you get a prediction of whether its skyrmion phase is reachable near room temperature and low field. The paper's headline prediction is that noncentrosymmetric semi-metals with slightly more than half-filled d-orbitals are the most promising place to look.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin density of energy, DOEs = DOEdown − DOEup, computed from spin-polarized band structures and integrated up to the Fermi level to give Espin, a measure of spin instability. The load-bearing feature is the local minimum in that integral just above the Fermi level, named Ereq, which the paper treats as the excitation energy required to reach the skyrmion state; normalizing Ereq by unit-cell volume is what makes different crystal structures comparable. What this quantity does is convert a ground-state, zero-field band-structure calculation into a prediction of finite-field, finite-temperature phase behavior.

What would settle it

Re-plot Figure 7b with Ereq normalized as the text states (per unit-cell volume) rather than as Table S2 implements it (per volume per magnetic atom), and check whether the correlation with temperature and field survives. Alternatively, run noncollinear supercell DFT on one host—for instance MnSi, with the skyrmion spin texture imposed—and compare the energy difference from the collinear ground state with the extracted Ereq; a disagreement beyond the paper's own ~30% scatter against experimental energy models would falsify the mapping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the onset conditions of a skyrmion phase are encoded in the ground-state electronic structure, specifically in the spin density of energy. In every skyrmion host examined, the integrated spin density of energy shows a destabilizing feature near the Fermi level followed by a local minimum just above it; the authors identify that minimum, Ereq, as the energy cost the system must pay to reach the excited state in which skyrmions appear. Normalized by unit-cell volume, Ereq/Å3 correlates with the temperature and field at which each material shows its strongest magneto-entropy response: the larger the value, the harsher the conditions (Figure 7b). Two independent estimat

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the local minimum in the ground-state spin density of energy just above the Fermi level (Ereq) equals the energy a material must absorb to enter the skyrmion phase; the Figure 7b correlation rests entirely on that identification and on the chosen volume normalization, yet no derivation connects the band-structure feature to the thermodynamic cost of the transition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A routine spin-polarized DFT calculation, post-processed into DOEs, can rank known and candidate skyrmion hosts by the temperature and field their skyrmion phase will demand, making Ereq/Å3 a screening descriptor.
Doping that shifts the Fermi level into a region of stronger electronic instability should convert non-skyrmion hosts into skyrmion hosts, as argued for Mn2RhSn → Mn2Rh0.95Ir0.05Sn and for hole-doped B20 compounds.
The framework predicts ambient-condition skyrmions are most likely in noncentrosymmetric semi-metals with d6–d7 configurations, which should focus experimental synthesis on that class.
Because the framework is grounded in ground-state collinear DFT, it is silent on skyrmion size and phase stability windows; the paper delegates those questions to noncollinear supercell calculations and micromagnetic modeling.
For known hosts, the DOEs curve itself suggests how to tune conditions: chemical adjustments that lower Ereq/Å3 should soften the field and temperature needed for skyrmion formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Ereq/Å3 is a true transition cost, the strongest test is within a single substitution series (e.g., GdRu2Si2 → GdRu2Ge2 → GdRu2Sn2 or MnSi → MnGe → FeGe), where crystal-structure noise is minimal; the paper shows these series but does not perform a quantitative fit.
The volume normalization is doing significant work, and the supporting table implements it as energy per magnetic atom rather than per formula-unit volume as the text states; whether the Figure 7b ordering survives the normalization stated in the text is a direct check a reader can make.
One could invert the correlation: set a target ambient window (roughly 300 K and ≤0.1 T), read off the corresponding Ereq/Å3, and screen crystallographic databases for compounds whose computed DOEs shows a local minimum in that range—a screening strategy the paper implies but does not run.
The descriptor measures onset conditions, not stability: a material passing the Ereq screen might still host skyrmions only in a narrow field-temperature pocket, so pairing with micromagnetic or noncollinear calculations would be needed to bound the skyrmion phase itself.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's real contribution is the spin-resolved DOE/DOEs framework: using the integrated spin density of energy to connect electronic instabilities to skyrmion formation conditions, and extending that instability picture to insulating hosts where Fermi-surface nesting does not apply. That is a genuinely fresh angle, and the paper includes new DFT-derived data for 14 known hosts. The isostructural comparisons (GdRu2Si2 vs GdRu2Ge2, MnSi/MnGe/FeGe, the Eu series) are internally consistent and give the framework some credibility. The conceptual narrative is clear and the DM/RKKY classification is competent review material.

The soft spots are real, and one is load-bearing. The paper repeatedly says Ereq is normalized by unit-cell volume, but Table S2 gives EReq·N_mag/V_cell—equivalently EReq divided by volume per magnetic atom. For FeGe, the stated 0.149 eV/Å3 comes from 3.88×4/103.82, not 3.88/103.82. For Cu2OSeO3, the factor is 16. So the rankings in Figure 7b are not invariant to the stated normalization, and the central claim that larger Ereq/Å3 means higher formation fields/temperatures is not supported by the numbers as reported. This needs to be fixed before the quantitative claim can be taken seriously.

Second, Ereq extraction is not algorithmic: "a local minimum right above 4 eV where its first derivative is zero" is a visual identification, with no window or tolerance. Combined with the collinear-DFT caveat the authors themselves state in the SI, the mapping from a ground-state band-structure feature to the thermodynamic cost of forming a skyrmion phase is asserted, not derived. Third, Cu2OSeO3 is retained despite lacking the claimed positive Espin signature, justified by "changes in slope"—that weakens the claim of a common signature. Fourth, validation is entirely in-sample; the final recommendation (noncentrosymmetric semimetals with slightly more than half-filled d-orbitals) is a reasonable summary of known room-temperature hosts, not a falsifiable new prediction.

The SI's theoretical validation model uses fitted parameters (θD and μ), which the authors acknowledge, and the model does capture the right energy scale for low-field, low-temperature systems. That is a minor concern relative to the normalization issue.

Overall: this is a useful heuristic and a worthwhile perspective, but as it stands the quantitative claim overreaches. The framework deserves a serious referee—I would send it out with the expectation of major revision. The normalization must be recomputed or clearly redefined, the Ereq extraction should be made repeatable, and an out-of-sample test, even on one or two materials, would substantially strengthen it. For a reader in the skyrmion or quantum-materials screening space, this is worth the time; just don't cite it for the quantitative correlation until the numbers are fixed.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a semi-quantitative descriptor, EReq, extracted from the integrated spin density of energy (DOEs) above the Fermi level in collinear spin-polarized DFT, and claims that EReq normalized per unit-cell volume correlates with the temperature and magnetic-field conditions required for skyrmion formation across 14 established skyrmion hosts. The authors combine this with qualitative design rules (d- vs f-electron character, orbital filling, DM vs RKKY interactions) into a 'treasure map' and recommend noncentrosymmetric semi-metals with slightly more than half-filled d-orbitals as the most promising candidates for ambient-condition skyrmions. The central quantitative result is Figure 7b, which plots EReq/Å3 against TSmax and HSmax and is asserted to show that larger EReq/Å3 implies higher formation temperatures and/or fields.

Significance. If the EReq/Å3 correlation were robust, it would provide a computationally cheap, DFT-based screening descriptor for skyrmion-host discovery, connecting ground-state electronic structure to experimentally accessible skyrmion-phase conditions. The manuscript also offers a useful qualitative synthesis of the DM versus RKKY branches, the differing behavior of d- and f-electron systems, and the role of orbital filling. The authors are commendably explicit about several limitations, including the collinear-DFT approximation and the subjective nature of the EReq extraction. However, the quantitative core is not currently established: the stated unit-cell-volume normalization is not what is implemented in Table S2, the EReq feature is not defined algorithmically, one host (Cu2OSeO3) does not exhibit the claimed positive Espin signature, and the descriptor is validated only on the same hosts used to define the trend. The proposed candidate class is essentially a restatement of known room-temperature hosts, so the predictive value is limited as written.

major comments (4)

[§2.5, Table S2, Figure 7b] The text states that EReq is normalized by unit-cell volume (§2.5 and Summary), but the Table S2 entries 'EReq per Å3' do not equal EReq/V. For FeGe, 3.88 eV/103.82 Å3 = 0.037 eV/Å3, not the listed 0.149; for Cu2OSeO3, 2.42/710.93 = 0.0034 eV/Å3, not 0.054. The multiplicative correction varies across materials (×4 for B20 compounds, ×16 for Cu2OSeO3, ×8 for VOSe2O5), so the ranking in Figure 7b is not invariant to the normalization choice. Because Figure 7b is the central quantitative claim, this inconsistency must be resolved: either recompute the trend with the stated EReq/V normalization, or explicitly redefine and justify the per-magnetic-atom normalization actually used.
[§2.2, §2.5, SI 'Proposed approach'] EReq is defined as 'a local minimum right above 4 eV where its first derivative is zero' with no algorithmic specification of the energy window, tolerance, or selection rule. For Cu2OSeO3, the positive Espin criterion is absent, and the authors instead appeal to 'changes in slope' (§2.5), effectively changing the descriptor from case to case. The SI itself concedes that extracting EReq 'solely from the ground-state band structure above EF is likely to be an oversimplification' for hosts with helical ground states. As written, the extraction is not reproducible and the chain from band-structure feature to skyrmion-formation energy is not established.
[§2.6, Figure 7b] The claim that 'systems with larger EReq/Å3 require higher temperatures and/or magnetic fields to transition to a skyrmion state' is not supported as a monotonic statement by the reported data. Using Table S2, GaMo4S8 has EReq/Å3 = 0.082, TSmax = 25 K, HSmax = 0.1 T, while MnSi has 0.073, 28 K, 0.12 T; the larger-EReq material exhibits both lower T and lower H. Since the 'and/or' formulation is satisfied by almost any monotonic trend in a 3D plot, this counterexample shows that the claimed relationship is not a reliable guide. A quantitative measure (e.g., rank correlation) and explicit handling of outliers are needed.
[§5, Table S2, Figure 7] The descriptor is validated on the same 14 hosts used to define the trend, with no out-of-sample prediction or leave-one-out cross-validation. The resulting recommendation—noncentrosymmetric semi-metals with slightly above half-filled d-orbitals—is a restatement of the known room-temperature hosts FeGe, Co8Zn9Mn3, Mn2Rh0.95Ir0.05Sn, and Mn1.4Pt0.9Pd0.1Sn listed in §4.3. To support the predictive value claimed in the Summary, the manuscript should identify new candidate materials with explicit EReq/Å3 thresholds and testable skyrmion-formation conditions, or at least perform a leave-one-out analysis to show the descriptor is not merely summarizing the input set.

minor comments (4)

[§1, Figure 1 caption] Typos: '1 Testa river' should be '1 Tesla river'; 'Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya' should be 'Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya'; 'Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosdia' should be 'Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida'.
[§4.4] Typo: 'skrymion' should be 'skyrmion' in 'for skrymion hosts at ambient conditions'.
[Figure 7] The 3D scatter plot is difficult to read; material labels are not visible and the 'and/or' relationship is hard to assess. A 2D projection or labeled markers with a rank-order table would improve clarity.
[Equations (1), (3)-(5)] Equation (1) appears after the text that refers to it, and Equations (3)-(5) are similarly placed after their discussion. Reorder for readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Ereq/Å3 trend is an in-sample correlation with an internal normalization inconsistency, and the final 'prediction' restates known room-temperature hosts.

renaming known result [Section 4.3 and Section 5 (Summary)]
"These systems illustrate that skyrmions at ambient conditions are most likely to be realized in semi-metals with slightly more than half-filled d-orbitals (d6, d7). ... Taking all into consideration, we predict that noncentrosymmetric semi-metals with slightly above half-filled d-orbitals would be excellent candidates for hosting skyrmions at ambient conditions."

The 'prediction' is a restatement of the same known room-temperature hosts listed immediately before (FeGe, Co8Zn9Mn3, Mn2Rh0.95Ir0.05Sn, Mn1.4Pt0.9Pd0.1Sn). It is not derived from the Ereq/Å3 descriptor; no new material is proposed. The conclusion only renames the empirical inputs as a prediction, so it adds no independent predictive content.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular: Ereq is extracted from collinear spin-resolved DFT (integrated DOEs local minimum above EF) without using skyrmion T/H data; the external-energy models in the SI use Debye/Zeeman terms or experimental magneto-entropy and magnetization, providing independent albeit approximate comparisons. Self-citations (refs 52, 53, 86, 88) are not load-bearing; independent references support the electronic-instability claims. However, the paper's central Figure 7b trend is validated only in-sample on the same 14 hosts from which the descriptor was developed, and the SI admits that extracting Ereq from ground-state collinear DFT is 'likely to be an oversimplification' for hosts with helical ground states. In addition, Table S2's 'EReq per Å3' values are not unit-cell-volume normalized as stated (e.g., FeGe: 3.88 eV/103.82 Å3 = 0.037 eV/Å3, not 0.149; Cu2OSeO3: 2.42/710.93 = 0.0034, not 0.054), indicating an unstated per-magnetic-atom normalization that changes the ranking. These are correctness and reproducibility concerns, not circular derivations; they do not make the inputs equivalent to the outputs by construction. The only circular-adjacent step is the final 'prediction' being a paraphrase of the known room-temperature hosts, which is why the score is low rather than zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows that the central claim rests on an assumed physical interpretation of a DFT-derived band-structure marker, on an inconsistent normalization, and on two fitted constants in the supporting validation model. No new particles or forces are posited; the only new 'entity' is the Ereq/Å3 descriptor itself, which is a derived quantity rather than a new physical object.

free parameters (2)

Debye temperature θD (Model 1) = 135 K (fixed for all hosts)
Fitted to make the external-energy estimate match Ereq; the authors call it 'far from accurate but sufficient for a rough validation' (Eq. S1).
Magnetic permeability μ (Model 1) = 0.26 H/m (fixed for all hosts)
Fitted constant in the field-energy term of Eq. S1; admitted as 'far from accurate'.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption A local minimum in the integrated spin density of energy above EF equals the energy required to stabilize the skyrmion (excited) state.
Invoked throughout Sections 2.2-2.5; this is the load-bearing mapping from a ground-state band-structure feature to skyrmion thermodynamics.
domain assumption Collinear spin-polarized DFT ground states suffice for the electronic-instability descriptor.
The authors themselves note (Section 3, SI) that most hosts have helical/noncollinear ground states and that collinear calculations are an oversimplification.
domain assumption Dividing Ereq by a volume makes chemically different skyrmion hosts comparable.
Section 2.5; Table S2 actually divides by V/N_magnetic_atoms, so the stated unit-cell-volume normalization is not what is implemented.
domain assumption A destabilizing positive Espin near EF is a common signature of skyrmion hosts.
Stated in Sections 2.2-2.6 but contradicted by Cu2OSeO3 (Section 2.5), which is excluded from the rule by a filling argument.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Treasure Map Toward Skyrmion Evolution in Ambient Conditions: A Perspective from Electronic Instabilities and the Density of Energy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZMNZ4DA

@misc{pith2026250908320,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Treasure Map Toward Skyrmion Evolution in Ambient Conditions: A Perspective from Electronic Instabilities and the Density of Energy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZMNZ4DA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08320}
}

read the original abstract

Magnetic skyrmions with topologically protected properties are anticipated to shape the future of electronics. Understanding how skyrmions may evolve in ambient conditions presents a key challenge in the pursuit of technologically significant materials. In this perspective, we focus on electronic instabilities and the density of energy of established skyrmion hosts, where a pathway to a skyrmion phase transition is readily available, to identify signposts for the emergence of skyrmions. We value the impressive research efforts in the field that have built the foundation for many more enticing breakthroughs to come. We share a framework that connects the electronic origins of skyrmion formation to the temperature and field requirements, allowing predictions of candidate materials that may host skyrmions at ambient conditions (the treasure).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08320 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The Skyrmion tree showing the formation mechanisms. The roots of the tree indicate the underlying driving force. Dzyaloshinkii-Moriya interactions, facilitated by larger spin-orbital coupling, stabilize skyrmions in non-centrosymmetric systems. Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosdia exchange interactions, assisted by geometrically frustrated lattice systems, stabilize skyrmions in centrosymmetric metallic systems [PITH_FULL… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** A treasure map illustrating pathways toward the realization of skyrmions at low-field and high-temperature towards ambient conditions, guided by key design parameters: d- or felectrons, orbital occupancy, metallic or insulating character, and DM or RKKY interactions. The highlighted route marks the parameter combination leading to the target ambient skyrmion (treasure). Current stage of knowledge The DM and RKKY in… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

4 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[2]

(9) Ishiwata, S.; Nakajima, T.; Kim, J.-H.; Inosov, D.; Kanazawa, N.; White, J.; Gavilano, J.; Georgii, R.; Seemann, K.; Brandl, G

Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2011, 84 (5), 054427. (9) Ishiwata, S.; Nakajima, T.; Kim, J.-H.; Inosov, D.; Kanazawa, N.; White, J.; Gavilano, J.; Georgii, R.; Seemann, K.; Brandl, G. Emergent Topological Spin Structures in the Centrosymmetric Cubic Perovskite SrFeO

work page 2011
[3]

(8) Ishiwata, S.; Tokunaga, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Okuyama, D.; Tokunaga, Y.; Wakimoto, S.; Kakurai, K.; Arima, T.; Taguchi, Y.; Tokura, Y

Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2013, 88 (22), 220405. (8) Ishiwata, S.; Tokunaga, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Okuyama, D.; Tokunaga, Y.; Wakimoto, S.; Kakurai, K.; Arima, T.; Taguchi, Y.; Tokura, Y. Versatile Helimagnetic Phases Under Magnetic Fields in Cubic Perovskite SrFeO

work page 2013
[4]

(10) Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, N.; Ukleev, V.; Yu, L.; White, J

Physical Review B 2020, 101 (13), 134406. (10) Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, N.; Ukleev, V.; Yu, L.; White, J. S.; Francoual, S.; Mardegan, J. R.; Hayami, S.; Saito, H.; Kaneko, K. Square and Rhombic Lattices of Magnetic Skyrmions in a Centrosymmetric Binary Compound. Nature communications 2022, 13 (1), 1472. (11) Franke, K. J.; Dean, P. R.; Hatnean, M. C.; Birc...

work page 2020
[5]

(28) Wang, S.; Luo, Q.; Luo, X.; Ma, S.; Chen, C.; Gao, F.; Lv, B.; Zhong, R.; Ren, W.; Zhong, Z

Physical Review B 2022, 106 (9), 094421. (28) Wang, S.; Luo, Q.; Luo, X.; Ma, S.; Chen, C.; Gao, F.; Lv, B.; Zhong, R.; Ren, W.; Zhong, Z. Tuning the Magnetism and Magnetocaloric Effects of EuAl 4 Single Crystals by Si and Cu Doping. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2023, 968, 171977. (29) Zhang, H.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Gawryluk, D. J.; Xie, W.; Ju, S.; Shi, ...

work page 2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

(9) Ishiwata, S.; Nakajima, T.; Kim, J.-H.; Inosov, D.; Kanazawa, N.; White, J.; Gavilano, J.; Georgii, R.; Seemann, K.; Brandl, G

Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2011, 84 (5), 054427. (9) Ishiwata, S.; Nakajima, T.; Kim, J.-H.; Inosov, D.; Kanazawa, N.; White, J.; Gavilano, J.; Georgii, R.; Seemann, K.; Brandl, G. Emergent Topological Spin Structures in the Centrosymmetric Cubic Perovskite SrFeO

work page 2011

[2] [3]

(8) Ishiwata, S.; Tokunaga, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Okuyama, D.; Tokunaga, Y.; Wakimoto, S.; Kakurai, K.; Arima, T.; Taguchi, Y.; Tokura, Y

Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 2013, 88 (22), 220405. (8) Ishiwata, S.; Tokunaga, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Okuyama, D.; Tokunaga, Y.; Wakimoto, S.; Kakurai, K.; Arima, T.; Taguchi, Y.; Tokura, Y. Versatile Helimagnetic Phases Under Magnetic Fields in Cubic Perovskite SrFeO

work page 2013

[3] [4]

(10) Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, N.; Ukleev, V.; Yu, L.; White, J

Physical Review B 2020, 101 (13), 134406. (10) Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, N.; Ukleev, V.; Yu, L.; White, J. S.; Francoual, S.; Mardegan, J. R.; Hayami, S.; Saito, H.; Kaneko, K. Square and Rhombic Lattices of Magnetic Skyrmions in a Centrosymmetric Binary Compound. Nature communications 2022, 13 (1), 1472. (11) Franke, K. J.; Dean, P. R.; Hatnean, M. C.; Birc...

work page 2020

[4] [5]

(28) Wang, S.; Luo, Q.; Luo, X.; Ma, S.; Chen, C.; Gao, F.; Lv, B.; Zhong, R.; Ren, W.; Zhong, Z

Physical Review B 2022, 106 (9), 094421. (28) Wang, S.; Luo, Q.; Luo, X.; Ma, S.; Chen, C.; Gao, F.; Lv, B.; Zhong, R.; Ren, W.; Zhong, Z. Tuning the Magnetism and Magnetocaloric Effects of EuAl 4 Single Crystals by Si and Cu Doping. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2023, 968, 171977. (29) Zhang, H.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Gawryluk, D. J.; Xie, W.; Ju, S.; Shi, ...

work page 2022