Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 49 references

The Murchison Widefield Array Enters Adolescence: A Personal Review of the Early Years of Operations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the MWA's success as a science facility and as an SKA-Low precursor was produced by specific management decisions made between 2008 and 2011, including the removal of real-time processing, the shift to a GPU correlat

desk verdict A candid, readable personal review of MWA management decisions that is honest about luck but overreaches when it claims those decisions were necessary for SKA readiness. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08361 v1 pith:PMLQQXQF submitted 2025-09-10 astro-ph.IM

Steven J. Tingay This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords MurchisonWidefieldArraylow-frequencyradioastronomyapertureSquareKilometreprecursorprojectmanagementGPUcorrelatorEpochofReionizationtelescopeoperations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a personal retrospective by the MWA's long-time manager arguing that the telescope's scientific success and its role as the low-frequency Square Kilometre Array precursor were not accidental but followed from a set of deliberate scope-and-risk decisions made in 2008–2011. Those decisions removed real-time processing from the critical path, replaced a stalled FPGA correlator with a GPU-based one, forced a one-quarter-scale 32-tile prototype, cut the array from 512 to 128 tiles, and chose a baseline distribution that balanced Epoch of Reionization science against a broad multi-science facility. The author's sharpest claim is that the SKA-Low stations would not be ready for construction without the Aperture Array Verification System program, which in turn depended on the MWA's infrastructure and community. The paper also draws general lessons for large instrument projects: keep internal delivery for design and requirements, outsource to industry where possible, and expect radio interferometry communities to want hands-on access to the system. Why care: if the account is right, the MWA is a case study in how management choices under resource pressure can determine a big science facility's trajectory.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the 2008–2011 project 'reshape' decision chain, with two especially load-bearing elements. First, the 32T prototype: a one-quarter-scale, 32-tile array built with off-the-shelf analogs, which acted as a 'concrete and near-term physical target' that delivered real data within two years, kept the science community engaged, and gave management time to settle the final plan. Second, the balanced 128-tile configuration, chosen over an EoR-only compact array, made the instrument a multi-science facility and sustained the user base needed for long-term operations and for precursor work. The paper also elevates 'data volume collected' over 'hours on sky' as

What would settle it

If archival funding-agency reviews from 2008–2011 show that the 128-tile cut, the GPU correlator, and the removal of real-time processing were externally mandated rather than management choices, the paper's causal narrative collapses. Alternatively, a contemporaneous low-frequency array that kept real-time processing and a hardware correlator yet matched the MWA's early science output and SKA precursor role would falsify the claim that these choices were necessary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the MWA's trajectory from an over-ambitious 512-tile design to a successful 128-tile operating telescope, and from that to a foundational role in SKA-Low, is explained primarily by a sequence of management decisions made in 2008–2011. The load-bearing causal chain is: dropping the real-time system and archiving visibilities reduced risk and made the GPU correlator possible; the 32T prototype gave the teams a concrete deliverable, bought management time, and produced real science that energized the community; cutting to 128 tiles with a balanced baseline distribution turned the array into a general-purpose facility that could support GLEAM, solar, transient, pulsar,

Load-bearing premise

The account assumes that the 2008–2011 management decisions, and not the external GFC stimulus funding and hiring windfalls, were what actually carried the project; the author himself concedes that 'an element of good fortune was involved,' and the retrospective attributions are not backed by contemporaneous decision documents.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the causal account is right, future large instruments should consider removing real-time processing from the critical path and archiving raw visibilities to reduce risk.
  • The 32T prototype model—a small, fast, off-the-shelf array that produces real science while the final design matures—is a transferable de-risking strategy for big projects.
  • A balanced baseline configuration, rather than a single-science-optimized one, can secure a broader community and therefore more science output, even for a headline goal like EoR.
  • SKA-Low construction readiness, including the AAVS station prototypes and the trained workforce, would not have happened without the MWA's infrastructure and people.
  • The lean operations model, with industry partnerships for delivery and maintenance, is viable over a decade-plus timescale for a radio telescope.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer a testable counterfactual: if a similar low-frequency array had kept real-time processing and a purpose-built correlator, its early science productivity and community growth would likely have been slower; comparing the MWA's commissioning timeline with that of a contemporaneous facility could test this.
  • The paper's metric argument suggests that future survey instruments with large fields of view should budget by data volume and commensal science yield rather than allocated observing hours; this could be modeled with archival usage statistics.
  • The author's retrospective is a single first-person account; a stronger test of the causal claim would be a structured comparison of contemporaneous decision documents and funding agency reviews, which the paper does not cite.
  • One implicit extension: the balanced-configuration decision implies that optimizing a facility for one flagship experiment can reduce total scientific output even for that experiment, because long baselines were needed to model EoR foregrounds; this argument could be quantified by re-parsing the MWA's publication and citation data per baseline type.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This is a personal retrospective by the former MWA Program Manager/Director reviewing the 2008-2011 reshaping of the MWA: removing real-time processing, replacing the failed FPGA correlator with a GPU correlator, building the 32T prototype, reducing the array to 128 tiles in a balanced configuration, and outsourcing receiver production. It then summarizes construction, early operations, Phase II, the data archive, science output, and the MWA's role as an SKA-Low precursor. The paper's central claim is that these management decisions and the lessons drawn from them produced the MWA's scientific success and materially enabled SKA-Low readiness, with the sharpest counterfactual in Section 5.

Significance. The manuscript has genuine value as a candid insider account: it openly discusses the unconverged FPGA correlator, the critically sampled receiver design flaw, and the original absence of an archive plan, and it provides checkable publication statistics (390 papers, h-index 57, 18,235 citations as of July 2025). The documentation of the AAVS program and the EY cost-savings estimate is useful. However, the paper's ability to support generalizable lessons is limited by its reliance on one person's retrospective attribution and by the confounding exogenous factors it concedes in Section 2.2. If framed as an opinion piece with explicit caveats, it is publishable; the current framing of 'verified' lessons and a strong counterfactual exceeds the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2/§6] Section 2.2 concedes two exogenous necessary conditions: GFC stimulus funded Pawsey (solving the archive and processing problem) and made the 'shovel ready' construction plan fundable. Section 6 then presents the lessons as 'verified' and attributes success to the management decisions ('by way of necessity and tight budgets...'). Because the internal decisions and exogenous windfalls are confounded, the paper does not establish that the decisions caused success. This is load-bearing for the paper's generalizability. Please either soften 'verified' to 'perceived by the author,' explicitly integrate the GFC contingency into the lessons, or give a concrete argument that the lessons are robust to the absence of Pawsey and the shovel-ready funds.
  2. [§5] The sentence 'The SKA-Low stations would not be ready for SKA construction without the AAVS program, which would not have been possible without the MWA' is a strong counterfactual with no counterfactual analysis. The cited EY estimate quantifies cost savings, not the 'would not have been possible' claim. This overclaim is not necessary for the paper's value; please qualify it as the author's assessment or support it with evidence about the absence of alternative paths (e.g., other station-prototype programs).
  3. [§2.1] The 2008-2011 decision sequence rests entirely on the author's recollections; no contemporaneous decision documents, funding-agency review minutes, or independent records are cited. For a historical account whose lessons are presented as verified, this evidential base is thin. Please either cite contemporaneous artifacts where available or explicitly label each recollection as 'as I recall', so the reader can calibrate the confidence of the causal narrative.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2 heading] 'Commisioning' should be 'Commissioning'.
  2. [§1] 'reshifted' should be 'redshifted'.
  3. [§2.1] 'disolved' should be 'dissolved'.
  4. [§2.1] The 32T prototype is described as 'one-quarter scale' but consists of 32 tiles against an original 512-tile design (a factor of 16 in tile count). Please clarify whether 'scale' refers to array diameter, collecting area, or something else.
  5. [§5] '$AU35M' is an unusual ordering; 'AU$35M' would be more standard. Also, the EY report footnote could include an access date for consistency with other URLs.
  6. [Ref. 48] Journal title 'J. Astron. Telesc. Instruments, Syst.' is missing 'and' in the abbreviation; check the journal's preferred citation format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper is an explicitly personal retrospective with no derivation chain, fitted parameters, or predictive claims to reduce.

full rationale

This manuscript is a personal review, not a derivation. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no quantitative predictions, and no formal inference from data to conclusion. The load-bearing claims are historical and causal: that certain 2008–2011 management decisions enabled the MWA's success and that the MWA enabled SKA-Low readiness. These are retrospective attributions made from the author's direct experience, not conclusions derived from the cited literature. The citations to MWA system description papers (e.g., [10], [11], [15]) document the built hardware and are independent, externally reviewed technical records; they are not used to prove the causal narrative. The paper itself disclaims completeness and formality: it says 'this is necessarily a rather personal reflection' and 'not comparable to a formal completion report.' Section 2.2 explicitly concedes that GFC stimulus funding and Pawsey were exogenous 'good fortune' that solved the archive and processing problems, which undercuts the generalizability of the lessons but is a weakness in causal inference, not circularity. The claim in Section 5 that 'SKA-Low stations would not be ready for SKA construction without the AAVS program, which would not have been possible without the MWA' is a counterfactual assertion without a formal counterfactual analysis; it is underdetermined, but it is not circular because the AAVS-to-MWA dependency is a factual infrastructure relationship and the AAVS technical results are cited from external publications. The AU$35M saving figure comes from a Curtin-commissioned report hosted on the MWA website, which is self-referential evidence, but it is a third-party estimate and not a derivation step. No passage was found in which an output is defined as an input, a fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, or a uniqueness/ansatz conclusion rests solely on the author's own prior work. Under the stated rules, 'not standard consensus' and 'untested counterfactual' are evidence-quality concerns, not circularity. The appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on testimony and metrics rather than a mathematical or empirical derivation. The ledger records the unexamined premises behind the causal narrative: the accuracy of the author's recollections, the validity of bibliometric success as a proxy for scientific value, and the reliability of a commercial cost-saving estimate commissioned by the author's institution. There are no free parameters and no invented entities because the paper contains no quantitative model. The paper's own disclaimers (Section 1: 'not meant to be definitive or exhaustive') are consistent with this audit.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The author's retrospective causal attributions are accurate recollections of the decision process.
    The entire lessons-learned narrative rests on the author's personal testimony as MWA Program Manager/Director; no board minutes, decision documents, or independent archives are cited for the 2008-2011 decisions described in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Bibliometric success (390 publications, H-index 57, 18,235 citations) is a valid proxy for the MWA's scientific success.
    Section 4 cites these statistics via a self-maintained ADS public library; the paper treats them as the measure of scientific payoff without justifying the metric.
  • domain assumption The Ernst and Young AU$35M cost-saving estimate for SKA is reliable.
    Section 5 cites this figure via footnote 10, a Curtin-commissioned economic impact PDF on the MWA website, not an independent or peer-reviewed audit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Murchison Widefield Array Enters Adolescence: A Personal Review of the Early Years of Operations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PMLQQXQF

@misc{pith2026250908361,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Murchison Widefield Array Enters Adolescence: A Personal Review of the Early Years of Operations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PMLQQXQF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08361}
}
read the original abstract

The Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is a low frequency radio interferometer designed and developed by an international consortium, operated on behalf of the consortium by Curtin University. The MWA is a Precursor for the low frequency Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and is located at the SKA site in Western Australia, Inyarrimanha Ilgari Bundara, the CSIRO Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory. Commencing science operations in 2013 after an extended development period, the MWA has performed observations over a wide set of science objectives, has been upgraded multiple times, and has played a fundamental role in the development of the low frequency SKA. As MWA Program Manager from 2008 to 2011, as Director from 2011 until 2015, and then again from 2021 to the present, I describe some personal reflections on the MWA's activities and successes in these different dimensions, as well as my view of some of the approaches that have enabled these successes. I offer some of the lessons I've perceived over the last 17+ years in the project.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray.Astron

    van Haarlem, M.P .; Wise, M.W.; Gunst, A.W.; Heald, G.; McKean, J.P .; Hessels, J.W.T.; de Bruyn, A.G.; Nijboer, R.; Swinbank, J.; Fallows, R.; et al. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray.Astron. Astrophys.2013,556, A2. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/20 1220873

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20 2013

  2. [2]

    The Square Kilometre Array.Proc

    Dewdney, P .E.; Hall, P .J.; Schilizzi, R.T.; Lazio, T.J.L.W. The Square Kilometre Array.Proc. IEEE2009,97, 1482–1496. https: //doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021005

    work page arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Science with ASKAP

    Johnston, S.; Taylor, R.; Bailes, M.; Bartel, N.; Baugh, C.; Bietenholz, M.; Blake, C.; Braun, R.; Brown, J.; Chatterjee, S.; et al. Science with ASKAP . The Australian square-kilometre-array pathfinder.Exp. Astron.2008,22, 151–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686 -008-9124-7. Galaxies2025,1, 0 12 of 14

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686 2008

  4. [4]

    Apertif: Phased array feeds for the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope

    van Cappellen, W.A.; Oosterloo, T.A.; Verheijen, M.A.W.; Adams, E.A.K.; Adebahr, B.; Braun, R.; Hess, K.M.; Holties, H.; van der Hulst, J.M.; Hut, B.; et al. Apertif: Phased array feeds for the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope. System overview and performance characteristics.Astron. Astrophys.2022,658, A146, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141739

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141739 2022

  5. [5]

    Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe.Phys

    Furlanetto, S.R.; Oh, S.P .; Briggs, F.H. Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe.Phys. Rep.2006,433, 181–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.08.002 2006

  6. [6]

    Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities.Publ

    Beardsley, A.P .; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; Trott, C.M.; Pober, J.C.; Morgan, J.; Oberoi, D.; Kaplan, D.L.; Lynch, C.R.; Anderson, G.E.; McCauley, P .I.; et al. Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2019,36, e050. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2019.41

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2019.41 2019

  7. [7]

    Science with the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ

    Bowman, J.D.; Cairns, I.; Kaplan, D.L.; Murphy, T.; Oberoi, D.; Staveley-Smith, L.; Arcus, W.; Barnes, D.G.; Bernardi, G.; Briggs, F.H.; et al. Science with the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2013,30, e031. https://doi.org/10.1017/pas.20 13.009

    work page doi:10.1017/pas.20 2013

  8. [8]

    InThe Square Kilometre Array: A Science Mega-Project in the Making, 1990–2012; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp

    Schilizzi, R.T.; Ekers, R.D.; Dewdney, P .E.; Crosby, P ., Introduction. InThe Square Kilometre Array: A Science Mega-Project in the Making, 1990–2012; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51 374-9_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51 1990

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    The Murchison Widefield Array: Design Overview.IEEE Proc.2009,97, 1497–1506

    Lonsdale, C.J.; Cappallo, R.J.; Morales, M.F.; Briggs, F.H.; Benkevitch, L.; Bowman, J.D.; Bunton, J.D.; Burns, S.; Corey, B.E.; Desouza, L.; et al. The Murchison Widefield Array: Design Overview.IEEE Proc.2009,97, 1497–1506. https://doi.org/10.1109/ JPROC.2009.2017564

    2009

  2. [10]

    The Murchison Widefield Array: The Square Kilometre Array Precursor at Low Radio Frequencies.Publ

    Tingay, S.J.; Goeke, R.; Bowman, J.D.; Emrich, D.; Ord, S.M.; Mitchell, D.A.; Morales, M.F.; Booler, T.; Crosse, B.; Wayth, R.B.; et al. The Murchison Widefield Array: The Square Kilometre Array Precursor at Low Radio Frequencies.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2013, 30, e007. https:/...

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    The Phase II Murchison Widefield Array: Design overview.Publ

    Wayth, R.B.; Tingay, S.J.; Trott, C.M.; Emrich, D.; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; McKinley, B.; Gaensler, B.M.; Beardsley, A.P .; Booler, T.; Crosse, B.; et al. The Phase II Murchison Widefield Array: Design overview.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2018,35, e033. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2018.37

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Characterization of the ionosphere above the Murchison Radio Observatory using the Murchison Widefield Array.Mon

    Jordan, C.H.; Murray, S.; Trott, C.M.; Wayth, R.B.; Mitchell, D.A.; Rahimi, M.; Pindor, B.; Procopio, P .; Morgan, J. Characterization of the ionosphere above the Murchison Radio Observatory using the Murchison Widefield Array.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2017, 471, 3974–3987. htt...

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    DiFX: A Software Correlator for Very Long Baseline Interferometry Using Multiprocessor Computing Environments.Publ

    Deller, A.T.; Tingay, S.J.; Bailes, M.; West, C. DiFX: A Software Correlator for Very Long Baseline Interferometry Using Multiprocessor Computing Environments.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.2007,119, 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/513572

    2007 doi

  6. [14]

    Cots Correlator Platform.Exp

    Schaaf, K.; Overeem, R. Cots Correlator Platform.Exp. Astron.2004,17, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-005-2864-8

    2004 doi

  7. [15]

    The Murchison Widefield Array Correlator.Publ

    Ord, S.M.; Crosse, B.; Emrich, D.; Pallot, D.; Wayth, R.B.; Clark, M.A.; Tremblay, S.E.; Arcus, W.; Barnes, D.; Bell, M.; et al. The Murchison Widefield Array Correlator.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2015,32, e006. https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2015.5

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    A GPU-based Real-time Software Correlation System for the Murchison Widefield Array Prototype.Publ

    Wayth, R.B.; Greenhill, L.J.; Briggs, F.H. A GPU-based Real-time Software Correlation System for the Murchison Widefield Array Prototype.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.2009,121, 857. https://doi.org/10.1086/605334

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    Cobalt: A GPU-based correlator and beamformer for LOFAR.Astron

    Broekema, P .C.; Mol, J.J.D.; Nijboer, R.; van Amesfoort, A.S.; Brentjens, M.A.; Loose, G.M.; Klijn, W.F.A.; Romein, J.W. Cobalt: A GPU-based correlator and beamformer for LOFAR.Astron. Comput.2018,23, 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2018.04.006

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    The High Time and Frequency Resolution Capabilities of the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ

    Tremblay, S.E.; Ord, S.M.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Tingay, S.J.; Crosse, B.; Pallot, D.; Oronsaye, S.I.; Bernardi, G.; Bowman, J.D.; Briggs, F.; et al. The High Time and Frequency Resolution Capabilities of the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2015, 32, e005. https://do...

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    MWAX: A new correlator for the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ

    Morrison, I.S.; Crosse, B.; Sleap, G.; Wayth, R.B.; Williams, A.; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; Jones, J.; Tingay, S.J.; Walker, M.; Williams, L. MWAX: A new correlator for the Murchison Widefield Array.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2023,40, e019. https://doi.org/10.1017/ pasa.2023.15

    2023

  12. [20]

    A digital-receiver for the MurchisonWidefield Array.Exp

    Prabu, T.; Srivani, K.S.; Roshi, D.A.; Kamini, P .A.; Madhavi, S.; Emrich, D.; Crosse, B.; Williams, A.J.; Waterson, M.; Deshpande, A.A.; et al. A digital-receiver for the MurchisonWidefield Array.Exp. Astron.2015,39, 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-0 15-9444-3

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    New EoR power spectrum limits from MWA Phase II using the delay spectrum method and novel systematic rejection.Mon

    Kolopanis, M.; Pober, J.C.; Jacobs, D.C.; McGraw, S. New EoR power spectrum limits from MWA Phase II using the delay spectrum method and novel systematic rejection.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2023.521, 5120–5138, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad845

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    The MWA long baseline Epoch of reionisation survey—I

    Lynch, C.R.; Galvin, T.J.; Line, J.L.B.; Jordan, C.H.; Trott, C.M.; Chege, J.K.; McKinley, B.; Johnston-Hollitt, M.; Tingay, S.J. The MWA long baseline Epoch of reionisation survey—I. Improved source catalogue for the EoR 0 field.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2021, 38, e057. https:/...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array.Mon

    Beardsley, A.P .; Hazelton, B.J.; Morales, M.F.; Capallo, R.J.; Goeke, R.; Emrich, D.; Lonsdale, C.J.; Arcus, W.; Barnes, D.; Bernardi, G.; et al. A new layout optimization technique for interferometric arrays, applied to the Murchison Widefield Array.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc....

    2012

  16. [24]

    A 189 MHz, 2400 deg2 Polarization Survey with the Murchison Widefield Array 32-element Prototype.Astrophys

    Bernardi, G.; Greenhill, L.J.; Mitchell, D.A.; Ord, S.M.; Hazelton, B.J.; Gaensler, B.M.; de Oliveira-Costa, A.; Morales, M.F.; Udaya Shankar, N.; Subrahmanyan, R.; et al. A 189 MHz, 2400 deg2 Polarization Survey with the Murchison Widefield Array 32-element Prototype.Astrophy...

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    A survey for transients and variables with the Murchison Widefield Array 32-tile prototype at 154 MHz.Mon

    Bell, M.E.; Murphy, T.; Kaplan, D.L.; Hancock, P .; Gaensler, B.M.; Banyer, J.; Bannister, K.; Trott, C.; Hurley-Walker, N.; Wayth, R.B.; et al. A survey for transients and variables with the Murchison Widefield Array 32-tile prototype at 154 MHz.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2014,...

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Interferometric Imaging with the 32 Element Murchison Wide-Field Array.Publ

    Ord, S.M.; Mitchell, D.A.; Wayth, R.B.; Greenhill, L.J.; Bernardi, G.; Gleadow, S.; Edgar, R.G.; Clark, M.A.; Allen, G.; Arcus, W.; et al. Interferometric Imaging with the 32 Element Murchison Wide-Field Array.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.2010,122, 1353. https://doi.org/10.1086/657160

    2010 doi

  19. [27]

    Low-frequency Imaging of Fields at High Galactic Latitude with the Murchison Widefield Array 32 Element Prototype.Astrophys

    Williams, C.L.; Hewitt, J.N.; Levine, A.M.; de Oliveira-Costa, A.; Bowman, J.D.; Briggs, F.H.; Gaensler, B.M.; Hernquist, L.L.; Mitchell, D.A.; Morales, M.F.; et al. Low-frequency Imaging of Fields at High Galactic Latitude with the Murchison Widefield Array 32 Element Prototy...

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    First Spectroscopic Imaging Observations of the Sun at Low Radio Frequencies with the Murchison Widefield Array Prototype.Astrophys

    Oberoi, D.; Matthews, L.D.; Cairns, I.H.; Emrich, D.; Lobzin, V .; Lonsdale, C.J.; Morgan, E.H.; Prabu, T.; Vedantham, H.; Wayth, R.B.; et al. First Spectroscopic Imaging Observations of the Sun at Low Radio Frequencies with the Murchison Widefield Array Prototype.Astrophys. J...

    2011 doi

  21. [29]

    The Murchison Widefield Array Commissioning Survey: A Low-Frequency Catalogue of 14 110 Compact Radio Sources over 6 100 Square Degrees.Publ

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Morgan, J.; Wayth, R.B.; Hancock, P .J.; Bell, M.E.; Bernardi, G.; Bhat, R.; Briggs, F.; Deshpande, A.A.; Ewall- Wice, A.; et al. The Murchison Widefield Array Commissioning Survey: A Low-Frequency Catalogue of 14 110 Compact Radio Sources over 6 100 Square ...

    2014 doi

  22. [30]

    FAIR standards for astronomical data.arXiv2022, arXiv:2203.10710

    O’Toole, S.; Tocknell, J. FAIR standards for astronomical data.arXiv2022, arXiv:2203.10710. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203 .10710

    doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Optimising NGAS for the MWA Archive.Exp

    Wu, C.; Wicenec, A.; Pallot, D.; Checcucci, A. Optimising NGAS for the MWA Archive.Exp. Astron.2013,36, 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-013-9354-1

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey II: Galactic plane 345° < l < 67°, 180° < l < 240°.Publ

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Hancock, P .J.; Franzen, T.M.O.; Callingham, J.R.; Offringa, A.R.; Hindson, L.; Wu, C.; Bell, M.E.; For, B.Q.; Gaensler, B.M.; et al. GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey II: Galactic plane 345° < l < 67°, 180° < l < 24...

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey - I

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Callingham, J.R.; Hancock, P .J.; Franzen, T.M.O.; Hindson, L.; Kapi ´ nska, A.D.; Morgan, J.; Offringa, A.R.; Wayth, R.B.; Wu, C.; et al. GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array (GLEAM) survey - I. A low-frequency extragalactic catalogu...

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array survey eXtended (GLEAM-X) I: Survey description and initial data release.Publ

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Galvin, T.J.; Duchesne, S.W.; Zhang, X.; Morgan, J.; Hancock, P .J.; An, T.; Franzen, T.M.O.; Heald, G.; Ross, K.; et al. GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array survey eXtended (GLEAM-X) I: Survey description and initial data release.Pu...

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array eXtended (GLEAM-X) survey II: Second Data Release.Publ

    Ross, K.; Hurley-Walker, N.; Galvin, T.J.; Venville, B.; Duchesne, S.W.; Morgan, J.; An, T.; Gürkan, G.; Hancock, P .J.; Heald, G.; et al. GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array eXtended (GLEAM-X) survey II: Second Data Release.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.202...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Low Altitude Solar Magnetic Reconnection, Type III Solar Radio Bursts, and X-ray Emissions.Sci

    Cairns, I.H.; Lobzin, V .V .; Donea, A.; Tingay, S.J.; McCauley, P .I.; Oberoi, D.; Duffin, R.T.; Reiner, M.J.; Hurley-Walker, N.; Kudryavtseva, N.A.; et al. Low Altitude Solar Magnetic Reconnection, Type III Solar Radio Bursts, and X-ray Emissions.Sci. Rep. 2018,8, 1676. http...

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    A radio transient with unusually slow periodic emission.Nature2022,601, 526–530

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Zhang, X.; Bahramian, A.; McSweeney, S.J.; O’Doherty, T.N.; Hancock, P .J.; Morgan, J.S.; Anderson, G.E.; Heald, G.H.; Galvin, T.J. A radio transient with unusually slow periodic emission.Nature2022,601, 526–530. https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    doi

  30. [38]

    A long-period radio transient active for three decades.Nature2023,619, 487–490

    Hurley-Walker, N.; Rea, N.; McSweeney, S.J.; Meyers, B.W.; Lenc, E.; Heywood, I.; Hyman, S.D.; Men, Y.P .; Clarke, T.E.; Coti Zelati, F.; et al. A long-period radio transient active for three decades.Nature2023,619, 487–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586 -023-06202-5

    doi

  31. [39]

    Deep multiredshift limits on Epoch of Reionization 21 cm power spectra from four seasons of Murchison Widefield Array observations

    Trott, C.M.; Jordan, C.H.; Midgley, S.; Barry, N.; Greig, B.; Pindor, B.; Cook, J.H.; Sleap, G.; Tingay, S.J.; Ung, D.; et al. Deep multiredshift limits on Epoch of Reionization 21 cm power spectra from four seasons of Murchison Widefield Array observations. Mon. Not. R. Astro...

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    First Season MWA EoR Power spectrum Results at Redshift 7.Astrophys

    Beardsley, A.P .; Hazelton, B.J.; Sullivan, I.S.; Carroll, P .; Barry, N.; Rahimi, M.; Pindor, B.; Trott, C.M.; Line, J.; Jacobs, D.C.; et al. First Season MWA EoR Power spectrum Results at Redshift 7.Astrophys. J.2016,833, 102. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ 833/1/102

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Overcoming real-world obstacles in 21 cm power spectrum estimation: A method demonstration and results from early Murchison Widefield Array data.Phys

    Dillon, J.S.; Liu, A.; Williams, C.L.; Hewitt, J.N.; Tegmark, M.; Morgan, E.H.; Levine, A.M.; Morales, M.F.; Tingay, S.J.; Bernardi, G.; et al. Overcoming real-world obstacles in 21 cm power spectrum estimation: A method demonstration and results from early Murchison Widefield...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Spectral Flattening at Low Frequencies in Crab Giant Pulses.Astrophys

    Meyers, B.W.; Tremblay, S.E.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Shannon, R.M.; Kirsten, F.; Sokolowski, M.; Tingay, S.J.; Oronsaye, S.I.; Ord, S.M. Spectral Flattening at Low Frequencies in Crab Giant Pulses.Astrophys. J.2017,851, 20. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8 bba

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Real-time imaging of density ducts between the plasmasphere and ionosphere.Geophys

    Loi, S.T.; Murphy, T.; Cairns, I.H.; Menk, F.W.; Waters, C.L.; Erickson, P .J.; Trott, C.M.; Hurley-Walker, N.; Morgan, J.; Lenc, E.; et al. Real-time imaging of density ducts between the plasmasphere and ionosphere.Geophys. Res. Lett.2015,42, 3707–3714. https://doi.org/10.100...

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    First results from AAVS 0.5: A prototype array for next-generation radio astronomy

    Hall, P .J.; Sutinjo, A.T.; de Lera Acedo, E.; Wayth, R.B.; Razavi-Ghods, N.; Colegate, T.M.; Faulkner, A.J.; Juswardy, B.; Fiorelli, B.; Booler, T.; et al. First results from AAVS 0.5: A prototype array for next-generation radio astronomy. In Proceedings of the 2013 Internati...

    2013

  37. [45]

    Characterization of a Low-Frequency Radio Astronomy Prototype Array in Western Australia.IEEE T rans

    Sutinjo, A.T.; Colegate, T.M.; Wayth, R.B.; Hall, P .J.; de Lera Acedo, E.; Booler, T.; Faulkner, A.J.; Feng, L.; Hurley-Walker, N.; Juswardy, B.; et al. Characterization of a Low-Frequency Radio Astronomy Prototype Array in Western Australia.IEEE T rans. Antennas Propag.2015,...

    2015

  38. [46]

    The Engineering Development Array: A Low Frequency Radio Telescope Utilising SKA Precursor Technology.Publ

    Wayth, R.; Sokolowski, M.; Booler, T.; Crosse, B.; Emrich, D.; Grootjans, R.; Hall, P .J.; Horsley, L.; Juswardy, B.; Kenney, D.; et al. The Engineering Development Array: A Low Frequency Radio Telescope Utilising SKA Precursor Technology.Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.2017,34, e034....

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    The Aperture Array Verification System 1: System overview and early commissioning results.Astron

    Benthem, P .; Wayth, R.; de Lera Acedo, E.; Zarb Adami, K.; Alderighi, M.; Belli, C.; Bolli, P .; Booler, T.; Borg, J.; Broderick, J.W.; et al. The Aperture Array Verification System 1: System overview and early commissioning results.Astron. Astrophys.2021, 655, A5. https://do...

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Engineering Development Array 2: Design, performance, and lessons from an SKA-Low prototype station.J

    Wayth, R.; Sokolowski, M.; Broderick, J.; Tingay, S.J.; Bhushan, R.; Booler, T.; Chiello, R.; Davidson, D.B.; Emrich, D.; Juswardy, B.; et al. Engineering Development Array 2: Design, performance, and lessons from an SKA-Low prototype station.J. Astron. T elesc. Instruments, S...

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Characterization of the SKA1-Low prototype station Aperture Array Verification System 2.J

    Macario, G.; Pupillo, G.; Bernardi, G.; Bolli, P .; Di Ninni, P .; Comoretto, G.; Mattana, A.; Monari, J.; Perini, F.; Schiaffino, M.; et al. Characterization of the SKA1-Low prototype station Aperture Array Verification System 2.J. Astron. T elesc. Instruments, Syst. 2022,8, ...

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.