pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09390 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

A review on scanning photocurrent microscopy and its application to one- and two-dimensional materials

TAlip Serkan Kas{\i}rga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords scanning photocurrent microscopyphotothermal effectsone-dimensional materialstwo-dimensional materialsphotoresponseoptoelectronicslaser-induced heatingspatial mapping
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scanning photocurrent microscopy maps photoresponses in 1D and 2D materials but photothermal effects from the focused laser often complicate determining the underlying mechanisms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the fundamentals of scanning photocurrent microscopy as a method for spatial mapping of electrical responses under illumination. It then reviews applications to one- and two-dimensional materials and introduces a systematic approach to interpreting results while emphasizing laser-induced heating of electronic and lattice degrees of freedom. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate mechanism identification supports development of optoelectronic devices based on these materials. The review critically examines literature studies from the perspective of photothermal contributions and concludes by discussing inherent shortcomings of the technique in pinpointing photoresponse causes.

Core claim

Scanning photocurrent microscopy works by raster scanning a focused laser beam over a sample and recording the resulting photocurrent at each position to produce a spatial map of photoresponse. In one- and two-dimensional materials this mapping frequently encounters photothermal mechanisms excited by the same laser, which heat both electronic and lattice degrees of freedom and thereby alter the measured signals. A systematic interpretation framework that accounts for these heating contributions allows clearer separation of photovoltaic, photothermoelectric, and other effects in the cited studies. The technique nevertheless retains limitations that prevent definitive assignment of the precise

What carries the argument

Scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM), which produces spatial maps of photoresponse by raster-scanning a focused laser while recording local photocurrent and requires explicit accounting for laser-induced heating.

If this is right

  • SPCM data on common 1D and 2D materials can be reinterpreted by separating photothermal heating from other photoresponse mechanisms.
  • Many existing studies require re-examination because they did not explicitly control for laser-induced temperature rises.
  • Device design for optoelectronics gains reliability once photothermal contributions are isolated in the spatial maps.
  • Future measurements gain consistency by adopting the systematic approach that tracks both electronic and lattice heating.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the framework to include simultaneous temperature monitoring during scans could reduce ambiguity in mechanism assignment.
  • Conflicting photoresponse reports in the same material might be reconciled by reanalyzing them under the heating-accounting protocol.
  • The same systematic checks for laser heating could improve interpretation in related scanning-probe methods applied to low-dimensional systems.

Load-bearing premise

That a single systematic interpretation framework can be applied across existing literature studies to separate photothermal contributions without new experiments that control for laser heating in each specific case.

What would settle it

A controlled SPCM experiment on a well-characterized 2D material in which laser power or wavelength is varied to change heating while the interpreted mechanism shifts would show that prior analyses missed the photothermal role.

read the original abstract

The electrical response of a material when illuminated with light is a key to many optoelectronic device applications. This so-called photoresponse typically has a non-uniform spatial distribution through the active device area, and the ability to spatially resolve the photoresponse enables an in-depth understanding of the underlying physical mechanisms. Scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) is a method that allows the spatial mapping of the photoresponse by raster scanning a focused laser beam over the sample. SPCM is becoming more popular due to its simplicity and power in unraveling fundamental optoelectronic processes. In this review, first, we provide the fundamentals of SPCM to lay the basics for the subsequent discussions. Then, we focus on the literature that employs SPCM to identify the photoresponse of one- and two-dimensional materials. We discuss SPCM measurement results of common materials in detail and introduce a systematic approach to interpreting the SPCM measurements. We have given particular emphasis on the photothermal mechanisms that are excited by the focused laser beam and critically reviewed studies in the literature from the perspective of laser-induced heating of the electronic and the lattice degrees of freedom. Finally, we discuss the shortcomings of SPCM in determining the mechanisms leading to the photoresponse.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article that outlines the principles of scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM), surveys its applications to one- and two-dimensional materials in the existing literature, proposes a systematic framework for data interpretation, highlights the role of photothermal effects induced by the scanning laser, provides a critical assessment of prior studies through the lens of laser heating, and identifies key shortcomings of the technique.

Significance. Should the systematic interpretation approach prove robust and the critical review of photothermal contributions accurate, this review would offer substantial guidance to the community by helping to clarify the origins of photoresponses in 1D and 2D materials and by underscoring the need for careful experimental design to mitigate heating artifacts. The organizational synthesis and cautionary notes represent a useful contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on systematic approach to interpreting the SPCM measurements] The description of the systematic approach does not include a worked example applying the framework to reinterpret results from one of the reviewed studies, which would strengthen the claim that it can be used to better identify mechanisms.
  2. [Discussion of photothermal mechanisms] The critical review would benefit from quantitative estimates of the expected lattice and electronic temperature rises under typical SPCM conditions (e.g., laser power, wavelength, and spot size), as this would make the assessment of specific literature studies more definitive rather than qualitative.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fundamentals of SPCM] Clarify the distinction between different photoresponse mechanisms with additional schematic diagrams if possible.
  2. [Literature review sections] Some citations appear to be grouped without individual discussion of their experimental parameters, which could be expanded for completeness.
  3. [Shortcomings section] The list of shortcomings is comprehensive but could reference specific examples from the literature to illustrate each point.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on systematic approach to interpreting the SPCM measurements] The description of the systematic approach does not include a worked example applying the framework to reinterpret results from one of the reviewed studies, which would strengthen the claim that it can be used to better identify mechanisms.

    Authors: We agree that a worked example would enhance the practical value of the systematic framework. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection that applies the full interpretation steps to one representative study from the reviewed literature (for instance, a SPCM measurement on a MoS2 device or a carbon nanotube), explicitly walking through each stage to show how the framework distinguishes between possible photoresponse mechanisms such as photovoltaic effects versus photothermoelectric contributions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of photothermal mechanisms] The critical review would benefit from quantitative estimates of the expected lattice and electronic temperature rises under typical SPCM conditions (e.g., laser power, wavelength, and spot size), as this would make the assessment of specific literature studies more definitive rather than qualitative.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this helpful suggestion. To make the photothermal discussion more quantitative, we will include order-of-magnitude estimates of lattice and electronic temperature increases under representative SPCM conditions (e.g., 1–100 μW power, 532–785 nm wavelength, ~1 μm spot size). These estimates will be derived from standard heat diffusion models and supported by values reported in the literature for 1D and 2D materials on common substrates, allowing more definitive comparison with the studies we critically review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This paper is a review synthesizing existing literature on scanning photocurrent microscopy (SPCM) applied to 1D and 2D materials. It covers fundamentals, discusses results from cited studies, introduces a systematic interpretation framework, and critically examines photothermal effects without advancing any new derivations, quantitative predictions, fitted parameters, or mechanistic models. The central contribution is organizational and cautionary, drawing directly from external literature rather than reducing any claim to self-defined inputs or self-citation chains. No load-bearing steps exist that equate outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review article the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; it draws on standard optoelectronics concepts and cited experimental literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1051 out tokens · 34277 ms · 2026-05-18T17:59:25.509793+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V Lang, C

    D. V Lang, C. H. Henry, Solid State Electron 1978, 21, 1519

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    D. Sun, G. Aivazian, A. M. Jones, J. S. Ross, W. Yao, D. Cobden, X. Xu, Nat Nanotechnol 2012, 7, 114

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    C.-K. Sun, F. Vallée, L. H. Acioli, E. P. Ippen, J. G. Fujimoto, Phys Rev B 1994, 50, 15337

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    Heilpern, M

    T. Heilpern, M. Manjare, A. O. Govorov, G. P. Wiederrecht, S. K. Gray, H. Harutyunyan, Nature Communications 2018 9:1 2018, 9, 1

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Della Valle, M

    G. Della Valle, M. Conforti, S. Longhi, G. Cerullo, D. Brida, Phys Rev B 2012, 86, 155139

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Del Fatti, C

    N. Del Fatti, C. Voisin, M. Achermann, S. Tzortzakis, D. Christofilos, F. Vallée, Phys Rev B 2000, 61, 16956

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Y. Dubi, Y. Sivan, Light Sci Appl 2019, 8, 89

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J. C. W. Song, M. S. Rudner, C. M. Marcus, L. S. Levitov, Nano Lett 2011, 11, 4688. 25

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    N. M. Gabor, J. C. W. Song, Q. Ma, N. L. Nair, T. Taychatanapat, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. S. Levitov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Science (1979) 2011, 334, 648

    work page 1979

  10. [10]

    C. I. Evans, P. Zolotavin, A. Alabastri, J. Yang, P. Nordlander, D. Natelson, Nano Lett 2017, 17, 5646

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Razeghi, M

    M. Razeghi, M. Üstünçelik, F. Shabani, H. V. Demir, T. S. Kasırga, T. S. Kasirga, Nanoscale Horiz 2022, 7, 396

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    J. B. Herzog, M. W. Knight, D. Natelson, Nano Lett 2014, 14, 499

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    T. S. Kasirga, Thermal Conductivity Measurements in Atomically Thin Materials and Devices, Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Nagpal, R

    A. Nagpal, R. S. Gupta, G. P. Srivastava, V. K. Jain, G. S. Chilana, Solar Cells 1990, 29, 73

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    M. M. Furchi, D. K. Polyushkin, A. Pospischil, T. Mueller, Nano Lett 2014, 14, 6165

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Buscema, M

    M. Buscema, M. Barkelid, V. Zwiller, H. S. J. J. van der Zant, G. A. Steele, A. Castellanos-Gomez, H. S. J. van der Zant, G. A. Steele, A. Castellanos-Gomez, Nano Lett 2013, 13, 358

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    M. L. Andersen, Sø. Stobbe, A. Sø. SØrensen, P. Lodahl, Nat Phys 2011, 7, 215

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Y. Meng, F. Li, C. Lan, X. Bu, X. Kang, R. Wei, S. P. Yip, D. Li, F. Wang, T. Takahashi, T. Hosomi, K. Nagashima, T. Yanagida, J. C. Ho, Sci Adv 2020, 6, 6389

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    C. M. Lieber, MRS Bull 2003, 28, 486

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    Iijima, Nature 1991 354:6348 1991, 354, 56

    S. Iijima, Nature 1991 354:6348 1991, 354, 56

    work page 1991

  21. [21]

    E. A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G. A. Steele, K. Grove-Rasmussen, J. Nygård, K. Flensberg, L. P. Kouwenhoven, Rev Mod Phys 2015, 87, 703

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    V. N. Popov, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2004, 43, 61

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    R. H. Baughman, A. A. Zakhidov, W. A. de Heer, Science (1979) 2002, 297, 787

    work page 1979

  24. [24]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P. Avouris, Eds. , Carbon Nanotubes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    N. M. Gabor, Z. Zhong, K. Bosnick, J. Park, P. L. McEuen, Science (1979) 2009, 325, 1367

    work page 1979

  26. [26]

    Aspitarte, D

    L. Aspitarte, D. R. McCulley, E. D. Minot, Nano Lett 2016, 16, 5589

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Barkelid, V

    M. Barkelid, V. Zwiller, Nat Photonics 2014, 8, 47

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Kannan Balasubramanian, Marko Burghard, Klaus Kern, Matteo Scolari, Mews Alf, Nano Lett 2005, 5, 507

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Freitag, J

    M. Freitag, J. C. Tsang, A. Bol, P. Avouris, D. Yuan, J. Liu, Appl Phys Lett 2007, 91, 031101

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Y. H. Ahn, A. W. Tsen, B. Kim, Y. W. Park, J. Park, Nano Lett 2007, 7, 3320

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    E. J. H. Lee, K. Balasubramanian, J. Dorfmüller, R. Vogelgesang, N. Fu, A. Mews, M. Burghard, K. Kern, Small 2007, 3, 2038

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Barkelid, G

    M. Barkelid, G. A. Steele, V. Zwiller, Nano Lett 2012, 12, 5649

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    DeBorde, L

    T. DeBorde, L. Aspitarte, T. Sharf, J. W. Kevek, E. D. Minot, ACS Nano 2013, 8, 216. 26

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Buchs, S

    G. Buchs, S. Bagiante, G. A. Steele, Nature Communications 2014 5:1 2014, 5, 1

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Park*, Nano Lett 2005, 5, 1367

    Yeonghwan Ahn, and James Dunning, J. Park*, Nano Lett 2005, 5, 1367

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    Fulkerson, J

    W. Fulkerson, J. P. Moore, R. K. Williams, R. S. Graves, D. L. McElroy, Physical Review 1968, 167, 765

    work page 1968

  37. [37]

    Krali, Z

    E. Krali, Z. A. K. Durrani, Appl Phys Lett 2013, 102, DOI: 10.1063/1.4800778

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4800778 2013

  38. [38]

    Y. Hyun, Y. Park, W. Choi, J. Kim, T. Zyung, M. Jang, Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 405707

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Kelzenberg, Daniel B

    Michael D. Kelzenberg, Daniel B. Turner-Evans, Brendan M. Kayes, Michael A. Filler, Morgan C. Putnam, * and Nathan S. Lewis, H. A. Atwater*, Nano Lett 2008, 8, 710

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    J. E. Allen, E. R. Hemesath, D. E. Perea, J. L. Lensch-Falk, Z. Y. Li, F. Yin, M. H. Gass, P. Wang, A. L. Bleloch, R. E. Palmer, L. J. Lauhon, Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3, 168

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Triplett, Y

    M. Triplett, Y. Yang, F. Léonard, A. A. Talin, M. S. Islam, D. Yu, Nano Lett 2015, 15, 523

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    M. Toda, T. Ono, F. Liu, I. Voiculescu, Review of Scientific Instruments 2010, 81, 055104

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    T. S. Kasırga, D. Sun, J. H. Park, J. M. Coy, Z. Fei, X. Xu, D. H. Cobden, Nature Nanotechnology 2012 7:11 2012, 7, 723

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    A. D. Mohite, D. E. Perea, S. Singh, S. A. Dayeh, I. H. Campbell, S. T. Picraux, H. Htoon, Nano Lett 2012, 12, 1965

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    J. E. Allen, E. R. Hemesath, L. J. Lauhon, Nano Lett 2009, 9, 1903

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    J. E. Allen, D. E. Perea, E. R. Hemesath, L. J. Lauhon, Advanced Materials 2009, 21, 3067

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    P. B. Roder, B. E. Smith, E. J. Davis, P. J. Pauzauskie, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2014, 118, 1407

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Kim, H.-S

    C.-J. Kim, H.-S. Lee, Y.-J. Cho, K. Kang, M.-H. Jo, Nano Lett 2010, 10, 2043

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Y.-S. Shin, D. Lee, H.-S. Lee, Y.-J. Cho, C.-J. Kim, M.-H. Jo, Opt Express 2011, 19, 6119

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    J. H. Park, J. M. Coy, T. Serkan Kasirga, C. Huang, Z. Fei, S. Hunter, D. H. Cobden, Nature 2013, 500, DOI: 10.1038/nature12425

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12425 2013

  51. [51]

    J. Wei, Z. Wang, W. Chen, D. H. Cobden, Nature Nanotechnology 2009 4:7 2009, 4, 420

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Miller, M

    C. Miller, M. Triplett, J. Lammatao, J. Suh, D. Fu, J. Wu, D. Yu, Phys Rev B 2012, 85, 85111

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    J. Cao, W. Fan, H. Zheng, J. Wu, Nano Lett 2009, 9, 4001

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    X. Wang, H. Gao, Nano Lett 2015, 15, 7037

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    B. T. O’Callahan, A. C. Jones, J. Hyung Park, D. H. Cobden, J. M. Atkin, M. B. Raschke, Nature Communications 2015 6:1 2015, 6, 1

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Zolotavin, A

    P. Zolotavin, A. Alabastri, P. Nordlander, D. Natelson, ACS Nano 2016, 10, 6972

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    E. J. H. Lee, K. Balasubramanian, R. T. Weitz, M. Burghard, K. Kern, Nature Nanotechnology 2008 3:8 2008, 3, 486

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    E. C. Peters, E. J. H. Lee, M. Burghard, K. Kern, Appl Phys Lett 2010, 97, 193102. 27

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    X. Xu, N. M. Gabor, J. S. Alden, A. M. van der Zande, P. L. McEuen, Nano Lett 2009, 10, 562

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Freitag, T

    M. Freitag, T. Low, F. Xia, P. Avouris, Nat Photonics 2013, 7, 53

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    J. Park, Y. H. Ahn, C. Ruiz-Vargas, Nano Lett 2009, 9, 1742

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    Q. Ma, N. M. Gabor, T. I. Andersen, N. L. Nair, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Phys Rev Lett 2014, 112, 247401

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    M. C. Lemme, F. H. L. Koppens, A. L. Falk, M. S. Rudner, H. Park, L. S. Levitov, C. M. Marcus, Nano Lett 2011, 11, 4134

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, T. F. Heinz, Phys Rev Lett 2010, 105, 136805

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    C.-C. Wu, D. Jariwala, V. K. Sangwan, T. J. Marks, M. C. Hersam, L. J. Lauhon, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2013, 4, 2508

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Jiang, Z

    J. Jiang, Z. Chen, Y. Hu, Y. Xiang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, G.-C. Wang, J. Shi, Nat Nanotechnol 2021, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-021-00919-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00919-y 2021

  67. [67]

    Çakıroğlu, N

    O. Çakıroğlu, N. Mehmood, M. M. Çiçek, A. Aikebaier, H. R. Rasouli, E. Durgun, T. S. Kasırga, 2d Mater 2020, 7, 035003

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Y. Hu, L. Zeng, A. J. Minnich, M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Chen, Nat Nanotechnol 2015, 10, 701

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson, I. V Grigorieva, S. V Dubonos, A. A. Firsov, Nature 2005, 438, 197

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    Bistritzer, A

    R. Bistritzer, A. H. MacDonald, Phys Rev Lett 2009, 102, 206410

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    Mueller, (夏丰年 F

    T. Mueller, (夏丰年 F. X., M. Freitag, J. Tsang, Ph. Avouris, Phys Rev B 2009, 79, 245430

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Y. M. Zuev, W. Chang, P. Kim, Phys Rev Lett 2009, 102, 96807

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    R. Kim, V. Perebeinos, P. Avouris, Phys Rev B 2011, 84, 75449

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    J. C. W. Song, M. S. Rudner, C. M. Marcus, L. S. Levitov, Nano Lett 2011, 11, 4688

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    H. Cao, G. Aivazian, Z. Fei, J. Ross, D. H. Cobden, X. Xu, Nature Physics 2015 12:3 2015, 12, 236

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Z. Yin, H. Li, H. Li, L. Jiang, Y. Shi, Y. Sun, G. Lu, Q. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Zhang, ACS Nano 2012, 6, 74

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Zhang, J

    W. Zhang, J. K. Huang, C. H. Chen, Y. H. Chang, Y. J. Cheng, L. J. Li, Advanced Materials 2013, 25, 3456

    work page 2013

  78. [78]

    W. Choi, M. Y. Cho, A. Konar, J. H. Lee, G. B. Cha, S. C. Hong, S. Kim, J. Kim, D. Jena, J. Joo, S. Kim, Advanced Materials 2012, 24, 5832

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Buscema, M

    M. Buscema, M. Barkelid, V. Zwiller, H. S. J. van der Zant, G. A. Steele, A. Castellanos-Gomez, H. S. J. J. van der Zant, G. A. Steele, A. Castellanos-Gomez, H. S. J. van der Zant, G. A. Steele, A. Castellanos-Gomez, Nano Lett 2013, 13, 358

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    Razeghi, J

    M. Razeghi, J. Spiece, O. Oğuz, D. Pehlivanoğlu, Y. Huang, A. Sheraz, U. Başçı, P. S. Dobson, J. M. R. Weaver, P. Gehring, T. S. Kasırga, NPJ 2D Mater Appl 2023, 7, 36. 28

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.