pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.09824 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Sensitivity of spectral lines to granulation: The Sun

K. Sowmya , A. I. Shapiro , V. Vasilyev , V. Witzke , A. Collier Cameron , S. K. Solanki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 16:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords solar granulationspectral linesradial velocity jitterneutral elementsionized elementsexoplanet detectionline masks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spectral lines from neutral elements vary more strongly in intensity under solar granulation, while those from ionized elements shift more in wavelength.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors introduce a new computational approach to study how granulation on the Sun affects different spectral lines. Instead of running expensive time-dependent simulations, they use the differences in line properties across a single snapshot of the granular pattern to estimate how the lines would change over time. Applying this method reveals a clear split: neutral species lines show bigger changes in their overall strength, while ionized lines exhibit larger shifts in their central positions. This matters for exoplanet searches because granulation creates jitter in radial velocity measurements that can hide Earth-like planet signals. By identifying which lines are sensitive in what way, better masks can be designed to filter out the granulation noise.

Core claim

We find a clear distinction between the two groups of lines: those from neutral elements tend to show stronger variations in line strength, whereas those from singly ionized elements exhibit larger variations in central wavelength. This is enabled by a novel methodology that uses spatial variability of spectral lines across the granulation pattern at a single moment in time to compute their temporal variability, significantly reducing computational costs.

What carries the argument

The novel methodology that uses spatial variability of spectral lines across the granulation pattern at a single moment in time to compute their temporal variability.

If this is right

  • This distinction allows development of spectral line masks tailored to granulation sensitivity.
  • Such masks offer a strategy to reduce granulation-induced radial velocity noise in exoplanet detection.
  • The approach cuts computational costs for calculating line sensitivities to stellar surface convection.
  • Results apply to analyzing responses of lines from neutral and singly ionized elemental species to solar granulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If validated, the spatial proxy method could extend to modeling granulation in other stars without full temporal simulations.
  • This line distinction might inform differential spectroscopy techniques for separating activity signals from planetary ones.
  • Applying the method to more elements could reveal patterns useful for optimizing spectrograph line lists.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that spatial variability of spectral lines across the granulation pattern at a single moment in time can be used to compute their temporal variability.

What would settle it

A comparison between the temporal variability computed from the spatial snapshot method and that from a full time-series simulation of evolving granulation would test if the proxy holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09824 by A. Collier Cameron, A. I. Shapiro, K. Sowmya, S. K. Solanki, V. Vasilyev, V. Witzke.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of the methodology used to analyze the spatial variability of spectral lines due to solar granulation. Panel a: specific intensity spatial maps at different wavelength points in the continuum and spectral line as indicated in panel e. Panel b: specific intensity map at a continuum wavelength and at original spatial resolution of the MURaM snapshot. Panel c: grid lines drawn on the map at th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Result of the ergodicity test. Shown are the cumulative distributions of spatial RVs from a single snapshot and temporal RVs from 20 spaxels time series, computed using the methodology detailed in Section 2. The two distributions are statistically indistinguishable, demonstrating the ergodic nature of the granulation driven RVs. slightly lower than that of Fe (7.902 eV). Thereby, Ti lines allow us to illus… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Differential sensitivity of spectral lines to solar granulation. Scatter in the line equivalent width (σWλ) normalized to the mean equivalent width (< Wλ >) is plotted as a function of the scatter in the center of gravity (σλcog) normalized to the mean center of gravity (< λcog >). Fe I lines are indicated with filled circles and Fe II lines are shown as filled stars. The symbols are colored according to E… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Granulation sensitivity of the sowmium neutral sample. The excitation energy of the lower level Elow is plotted as a function of the line equivalent width Wλ. Panel (a): points are color-coded according to the value of the variability in line equivalent width. Panel (b): the color-coding of the points are according to the value of the variability in line center of gravity wavelength displacements. To under… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Panel (a): vertical velocities (vz) at τRoss = 1 layer. Panel (b): mean temperature structure of the granule (GR, blue), intergranule (IGR, red) and all pixels combined (All, black). Panel (c)-(f) normalized intensity profiles of neutral sowmium lines with Elow = 1.5 eV and varying log(gf) and Wλ values which are indicated in the titles. See text for details. equivalent widths of lines of neutral species, … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Panels (a)-(b) are same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distributions of line center of gravity wavelength displacements (top row) and line equivalent widths (bottom row) calculated for two neutral sowmium lines with Elow values as indicated in the panels. Thin and thick black histograms show the distributions for all 512 x 512 pixels in the MURaM simulation snapshot. The red and the blue shaded histograms show the distributions for only pixels within intergran… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The intrinsic variability of stars, due to acoustic oscillations, surface granulation, and magnetic activity, introduces radial velocity (RV) jitter in spectral lines, obscuring true planetary signals and hindering the detection of Earth-like planets. Granulation is particularly challenging, as it affects even the most inactive stars introducing substantial signals, with amplitudes up to 1 m/s. Disentangling granulation-induced RV jitter from signal caused by planetary reflex motion requires reliable models of stellar granulation. In this study, we present a new approach for calculating sensitivities of spectral lines to granulation. We simulate near-surface convection with 3D radiative MHD code MURaM and calculate high-resolution emergent spectra with the radiative transfer code MPS-ATLAS. We then introduce a novel methodology that uses spatial variability of spectral lines across the granulation pattern at a single moment in time to compute their temporal variability. This approach significantly reduces computational costs. We apply our approach to analyze the response of lines from neutral and singly ionized elemental species to solar granulation.We find a clear distinction between the two groups of lines: those from neutral elements tend to show stronger variations in line strength, whereas those from singly ionized elements exhibit larger variations in central wavelength. These results enable the development of spectral line masks tailored to granulation sensitivity, offering a promising strategy to reduce granulation-induced RV noise and improve exoplanet detection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a novel methodology that uses spatial variability of spectral lines across a single MURaM granulation snapshot, combined with MPS-ATLAS radiative transfer, to proxy their temporal variability and thereby reduce computational cost. Applying this to solar lines, the authors report a clear distinction: neutral-element lines show stronger variations in line strength, while singly ionized lines exhibit larger variations in central wavelength. The results are positioned as enabling tailored spectral-line masks to mitigate granulation-induced RV jitter for exoplanet detection.

Significance. If the spatial-temporal proxy holds, the reported neutral/ionized distinction offers a practical, simulation-grounded route to line selection that could reduce ~1 m/s granulation jitter, directly supporting the search for Earth-like planets. The forward-modeling pipeline from 3D MHD convection is a methodological strength and avoids circular fitting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (novel spatial-variability proxy)] The novel methodology (described in the abstract and the methods section introducing the spatial proxy): the assumption that the ensemble of line profiles sampled across one instantaneous granulation pattern statistically reproduces the first and second moments of temporal line-strength and line-center fluctuations is load-bearing for the central claim yet is not supported by any side-by-side comparison to multi-snapshot time series, convergence test, or error budget quantifying mismatch from horizontal advection and velocity correlations.
  2. [Results] Results section reporting the group distinction: the headline separation between neutral and ionized lines is derived entirely from the single-snapshot spatial proxy; without quantitative validation against actual time-dependent data or observed line variability, the support for the claim remains plausible but unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a 'clear distinction' would be strengthened by a brief statement of the single-snapshot limitation and any uncertainty estimate.
  2. [Methods/Results] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit statement of the number of lines analyzed per group and the precise definition of 'line strength' and 'central wavelength' used for the variability metrics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and valuable suggestions. We respond to the major comments below and have updated the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional analyses where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The novel methodology (described in the abstract and the methods section introducing the spatial proxy): the assumption that the ensemble of line profiles sampled across one instantaneous granulation pattern statistically reproduces the first and second moments of temporal line-strength and line-center fluctuations is load-bearing for the central claim yet is not supported by any side-by-side comparison to multi-snapshot time series, convergence test, or error budget quantifying mismatch from horizontal advection and velocity correlations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. The spatial proxy is based on the statistical equivalence between spatial and temporal sampling in a stationary turbulent flow, where different locations in the snapshot correspond to different phases of the granulation lifecycle. This approach is commonly used in 3D stellar atmosphere modeling to reduce computational demands. We agree that additional validation is beneficial. In the revised version, we have expanded the Methods section to include a more detailed justification of the proxy, supported by references to previous studies on granulation variability. Additionally, we have performed a convergence test using two further snapshots and included an estimate of the uncertainty in the appendix. We discuss potential effects from horizontal advection and velocity correlations in the text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results section reporting the group distinction: the headline separation between neutral and ionized lines is derived entirely from the single-snapshot spatial proxy; without quantitative validation against actual time-dependent data or observed line variability, the support for the claim remains plausible but unquantified.

    Authors: The reported distinction relies on the spatial proxy as described. While a full time-dependent validation for the entire line set is computationally intensive, we have added in the revised manuscript a quantitative comparison for a representative sample of lines using available time series data from our simulations. This shows that the neutral/ionized trends hold. We have also included a discussion of how the proxy results align with expectations from line formation physics and noted the limitations in the conclusions. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full multi-snapshot time series analysis for the complete set of spectral lines analyzed, due to the significant computational resources required.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of forward simulation

full rationale

The paper runs MURaM 3D MHD convection and MPS-ATLAS radiative transfer on a single snapshot, then applies an explicitly introduced spatial-variability proxy to estimate temporal line fluctuations. The reported neutral-vs-ionized distinction is an emergent numerical result from this pipeline, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, not a self-citation load-bearing premise, and not a definitional loop. The proxy is a modeling choice whose validity is a separate empirical question, not a circularity issue. No equations or claims reduce to their own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the accuracy of the MURaM MHD simulation for solar granulation and on the untested equivalence between a single spatial snapshot and the full temporal behavior of line profiles.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption MURaM 3D radiative MHD simulations faithfully reproduce the statistical properties of solar near-surface convection.
    The entire sensitivity calculation is built on output from these simulations.
  • ad hoc to paper Spatial variability of emergent spectra across one granulation snapshot is statistically equivalent to the temporal variability that would be observed over time.
    This equivalence is the core of the novel methodology that reduces computational cost.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5798 in / 1401 out tokens · 40830 ms · 2026-05-18T16:59:48.744789+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Valenti, J. A. 2022, A&A, 664, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243276 Al Moulla, K., Dumusque, X., Figueira, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A39, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244663 16Sowmya et al. T able B2.List of Fe II lines synthesized with MPS-ATLAS. The atomic parameters are taken from VALD3 database. Vacuum wavelengthE low log(gf) (nm) (eV) 449.2660 2.853 -...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243276 2022

  2. [2]

    Prieto, C., & Stein, R. F. 2000, A&A, 359, 729, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005320

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0005320 2000

  3. [3]

    A., Stassun, K

    Bastien, F. A., Stassun, K. G., Pepper, J., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 29, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/29

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/29 2014

  4. [4]

    H., Reiners, A., & Sch¨ ussler, M

    Beeck, B., Cameron, R. H., Reiners, A., & Sch¨ ussler, M. 2013a, A&A, 558, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321345 —. 2013b, A&A, 558, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321343

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321345

  5. [5]

    2024, A&A, 681, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346460

    Bhatia, T., Cameron, R., Peter, H., & Solanki, S. 2024, A&A, 681, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346460

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346460 2024

  6. [6]

    S., Cameron, R

    Bhatia, T. S., Cameron, R. H., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A166, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243607

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243607 2022

  7. [7]

    2001, , 374, 733, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010730

    Bouchy, F., Pepe, F., & Queloz, D. 2001, A&A, 374, 733, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010730

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010730 2001

  8. [8]

    M., Shelyag, S., Watson, C

    Cegla, H. M., Shelyag, S., Watson, C. A., & Mathioudakis, M. 2013, ApJ, 763, 95, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/95

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/95 2013

  9. [9]

    M., Watson, C

    Cegla, H. M., Watson, C. A., Shelyag, S., Mathioudakis, M., & Moutari, S. 2019, ApJ, 879, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab16d3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab16d3 2019

  10. [10]

    M., Watson, C

    Cegla, H. M., Watson, C. A., Shelyag, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaddfc Collier Cameron, A., Mortier, A., Phillips, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 1082, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1215 Collier Cameron, A., Ford, E. B., Shahaf, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 1699, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1323

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaddfc 2018

  11. [11]

    2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Cosentino, R., Lovis, C., Pepe, F., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, ed. S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, & H. Takami, 91478C, doi: 10.1117/12.2055813

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2055813 2014

  12. [12]

    S., Leifer, S., et al

    Crass, J., Gaudi, B. S., Leifer, S., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2107.14291, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.14291

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14291 2021

  13. [13]

    and Dumusque, X

    Lovis, C. 2020, A&A, 633, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936548

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936548 2020

  14. [14]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 3344, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2393

    Meunier, N. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3344, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2393

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2393 2023

  15. [15]

    1982, ARA&A, 20, 61, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.000425 —

    Dravins, D. 1982, ARA&A, 20, 61, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.000425 —. 1987, A&A, 172, 211

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.20.090182.000425 1982

  16. [16]

    1981, A&A, 96, 345

    Dravins, D., Lindegren, L., & Nordlund, A. 1981, A&A, 96, 345

    work page 1981

  17. [17]

    2023, A&A, 679, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347142

    Dravins, D., & Ludwig, H.-G. 2023, A&A, 679, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347142

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347142 2023

  18. [18]

    , year =

    Dumusque, X. 2018, A&A, 620, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833795

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833795 2018

  19. [19]

    Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G. 2011, A&A, 525, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014097

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014097 2011

  20. [20]

    F., et al

    Dumusque, X., Glenday, A., Phillips, D. F., et al. 2015, ApJL, 814, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/l21 2015

  21. [21]

    M., Witzke, V., et al

    Frame, G., Cegla, H. M., Witzke, V., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2248, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf639

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf639 2025

  22. [22]

    G., et al

    Freytag, B., Steffen, M., Ludwig, H. G., et al. 2012, Journal of Computational Physics, 231, 919, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.026 2012

  23. [23]

    2000, The Second Solar Spectrum: A high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation

    Gandorfer, A. 2000, The Second Solar Spectrum: A high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation. Volume I: 4625 ˚A to 6995 ˚A —. 2002, The Second Solar Spectrum: A high spectral resolution polarimetric survey of scattering polarization at the solar limb in graphical representation. Vol...

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  25. [25]

    A., Collier Cameron, A., Faria, J

    John, A. A., Collier Cameron, A., Faria, J. P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 1687, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2381

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2381 2023

  26. [26]

    K., Wright, J

    Luhn, J. K., Wright, J. T., Howard, A. W., & Isaacson, H. 2020, AJ, 159, 235, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab855a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab855a 2020

  27. [27]

    Meunier, N., & Lagrange, A. M. 2019, A&A, 628, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935347

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935347 2019

  28. [28]

    M., & Borgniet, S

    Meunier, N., Lagrange, A. M., & Borgniet, S. 2017a, A&A, 607, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630328

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630328

  29. [29]

    M., Borgniet, S., & Rieutord, M

    Meunier, N., Lagrange, A. M., Borgniet, S., & Rieutord, M. 2015, A&A, 583, A118, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525721

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525721 2015

  30. [30]

    Meunier, N., Mignon, L., & Lagrange, A. M. 2017b, A&A, 607, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731017

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731017

  31. [31]

    W., Haywood, R

    Milbourne, T. W., Haywood, R. D., Phillips, D. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab064a Nordlund, ˚A., Stein, R. F., & Asplund, M. 2009, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 6, 2, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2009-2 O’Sullivan, N. K., & Aigrain, S. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1059

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab064a 2019

  32. [32]

    L., Ford, E

    Palumbo, III, M. L., Ford, E. B., Wright, J. T., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac32c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac32c2 2022

  33. [33]

    2021, A&A, 645, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039594

    Perger, M., Anglada-Escud´ e, G., Ribas, I., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039594

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039594 2021

  34. [34]

    E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T

    Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W., & Jeffery, C. S. 1995, A&AS, 112, 525

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    and Aigrain, S

    Roberts, S. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1428

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1428 2015

  36. [36]

    2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132 20Sowmya et al

    Rempel, M. 2014, ApJ, 789, 132, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/132 20Sowmya et al. —. 2018, ApJ, 859, 161, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabba0

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/2/132 2014

  37. [37]

    doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , eid =

    Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Kurucz, R. L., et al. 2015, PhyS, 90, 054005, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 2015

  38. [38]

    I., Solanki, S

    Shapiro, A. I., Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 612, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0217-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0217-y 2017

  39. [39]

    K., Krivova, N

    Solanki, S. K., Krivova, N. A., & Haigh, J. D. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 311, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141007

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141007 2013

  40. [40]

    Stenflo, J. O. 2005, A&A, 429, 713, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041667 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 V¨ ogler, A., Bruls, J. H. M. J., & Sch¨ ussler, M. 2004, A&A, 421, 741, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047043 V¨ ogler, A., Shelyag, S., Sch¨ ussler, M., et al. 2005, A&A...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041667 2005

  41. [41]

    B., Shapiro, A

    Witzke, V., Duehnen, H. B., Shapiro, A. I., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A157, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244771

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244771 2023

  42. [42]

    I., Cernetic, M., et al

    Witzke, V., Shapiro, A. I., Cernetic, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140275

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140275 2021

  43. [43]

    I., Kostogryz, N

    Witzke, V., Shapiro, A. I., Kostogryz, N. M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346099

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346099 2024