Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 63 references

Spectroscopy and transport of nonpolarons in silicon and germanium: the influence of doping and temperature

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that phonon satellites in silicon and germanium are placed correctly only by the cumulant expansion, and that their asymmetry explains germanium's higher mobility.

desk verdict A careful CE-based spectral/mobility study of Si and Ge with genuinely new predictions (Ge VBM/CBM asymmetry), but the quantitative doping/mobility claims lean on an undocumented impurity model and undoped matrix elements. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10192 v1 pith:UOGNWQGD submitted 2025-09-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Raveena Gupta , Joao Abreu , Matthieu J. Verstraete This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nonpolaronscumulantexpansionelectron-phononinteractionsilicongermaniumcarriermobilityspectralfunctiondopingdependence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors aim to show that the electron-phonon interaction in silicon and germanium leaves spectral fingerprints—phonon satellites attached to the quasiparticle peak—that only a resummation of many-body diagrams (the cumulant expansion) places at the correct energies. They find that silicon shows satellites at both band edges, while germanium shows strong sidebands at the valence-band maximum and almost none at the conduction-band minimum. This asymmetry, together with lighter effective masses, explains why germanium's carrier mobilities exceed silicon's. Temperature broadens the quasiparticle peak and merges the satellites into it, while doping broadens peaks and shrinks the satellite-quasiparticle gap, with n-type carriers acting on the conduction band and p-type on the valence band. Combined with a standard impurity-scattering model, the cumulant-based mobilities match measured trends across doping and temperature.

What carries the argument

The central object is the retarded cumulant function C(t), which exponentiates the Fan–Migdal self-energy—the standard second-order electron-phonon self-energy—to construct the single-particle Green's function instead of solving the Dyson equation. The exponential resummation places phonon satellites at one phonon frequency above the quasiparticle peak and captures multi-phonon effects, while the long-time slope of C(t) directly yields the quasiparticle lifetime and energy shift. The same spectral functions are fed into the Kubo–Greenwood conductivity formula, and a double-grid interpolation for the electron-phonon matrix elements makes the transport calculations feasible at dense k-meshes.

What would settle it

Measure with angle-resolved photoemission at 100 K the conduction-band edge of intrinsic germanium: if a distinct satellite appears at roughly one optical-phonon energy above the quasiparticle peak, the paper's central asymmetry claim fails. A complementary ab initio test: recompute the electron-phonon self-energy on a dense q-grid at 2×10^20 cm^-3 with doping-dependent screening and check whether the predicted satellite-QP compression survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is the band-edge asymmetry in the nonpolaronic spectral function: in silicon the phonon satellites are resolved at both the conduction-band minimum and the valence-band maximum, while in germanium the valence-band maximum shows pronounced sidebands and the conduction-band minimum shows only weak features. The authors interpret this as a difference in the orbital character and density of states near the edges, leading to longer conduction-electron lifetimes in germanium and hence its higher electron mobility. The cumulant expansion also predicts that the Dyson-Migdal approximation overestimates the satellite–quasiparticle separation, and that temperatur

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that free-carrier screening at doping levels up to 2×10^20 cm^-3 barely alters the short-range electron-phonon coupling computed for the undoped crystal, so that the reported doping-induced broadening and satellite compression are real; if screening does renormalize those short-range potentials, the high-doping results lose their quantitative meaning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For spectral measurements, the correct satellite position is one phonon frequency above the quasiparticle peak; the Dyson-Migdal approximation places it at the wrong reference energy and should not be used for fingerprinting.
  • Germanium's spectral asymmetry—strong VBM sidebands and weak CBM satellites—is a qualitative marker of its higher electron mobility; the inverse search (spectra to mobility) is viable within this framework.
  • Doping effects are band-selective: n-type carriers modify the CBM and p-type the VBM, so experiments on doped samples should target the corresponding band edge.
  • Because short-range potentials dominate phonon scattering in these nonpolar materials, free-carrier screening has little effect on the phonon-limited mobility; ionized-impurity scattering must be modeled separately to reproduce the experimental doping dependence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted asymmetry suggests a screening heuristic: for covalent semiconductors, a weak phonon sideband at the transport band edge indicates a high-mobility material; this could be tested by computing low-temperature spectral functions across a series of diamond-structure compounds.
  • The temperature-driven merging of satellites implies that cryogenic angle-resolved photoemission is the right experiment to observe nonpolaron fingerprints; room-temperature measurements may show only a broadened quasiparticle peak.
  • At high doping, the compressed satellite-QP separation makes the spectral function more Fermi-liquid-like; one could test whether this changes hot-carrier thermalization rates or optical absorption beyond the static screening description.
  • The mobility calculations rely on a double-grid interpolation that may be fragile near the degenerate valence band; using a denser interpolation or Wannier functions could shift the hole mobilities in silicon, although the Ge-Si ordering is likely robust.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents first-principles calculations of electron-phonon spectral functions and mobilities in silicon and germanium using the retarded cumulant expansion (CE) with Fan-Migdal self-energies from DFPT. It reports distinct nonpolaronic spectral fingerprints: Si shows well-resolved satellites at both the VBM and CBM, while Ge shows strong valence-band sidebands but much weaker conduction-band satellites. Temperature and doping are shown to broaden quasiparticle peaks and compress satellite-quasiparticle separation. Mobilities are computed with the Kubo-Greenwood formula, using CE, Dyson-Migdal (DM), and SERTA spectral functions, and combined with a Brooks-Herring impurity-scattering model to compare with experiment. The paper argues that Ge's higher mobility correlates with weaker CBM coupling and that the CE approach is necessary to capture these spectral and transport trends.

Significance. The central methodological claim—that CE on top of DFPT self-energies resolves nonpolaronic phonon satellites in Si and Ge beyond the DM approximation—is plausible and technically well documented. The paper provides a useful comparison between DM and CE for benchmark covalent semiconductors and connects spectral asymmetry at the CBM/VBM to transport trends. The study is reproducible in principle: all calculations are based on ABINIT, convergence tests are reported in Appendices B and D, and the spectral function calculations are parameter-free apart from the broadening η and grid sizes. However, the quantitative doping and mobility conclusions rest on two empirical or untested ingredients: the neglect of doping-dependent renormalization of e-ph matrix elements, and an undocumented Brooks-Herring impurity-scattering model. These issues do not invalidate the undoped spectral results but they do limit the strength of the claimed doping and transport validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV.1.2 and IV.3] The doped spectral and mobility calculations use undoped DFPT e-ph matrix elements, as explicitly stated: 'doping-dependent renormalization of the e-ph matrix elements is not included in our present simulations.' The justification that free-carrier screening only weakly renormalizes short-range potentials is not supported by a calculation or a specific reference for Si/Ge at concentrations up to 2e20 cm^-3, where the Thomas-Fermi screening length approaches interatomic distances. Since the doping-induced broadening and satellite-QP compression are central claims, these trends should either be shown robust against a screening model or reframed as phase-space effects only.
  2. [Sec. III (Eq. 15), Sec. IV.3] The Brooks-Herring impurity-limited mobility is introduced in Sec. III and used in Fig. 9, but no formula, screening length, compensation, or explicit doping/temperature dependence is reported. The 'excellent agreement' with experiment is therefore not reproducible or testable. At high doping, impurity scattering dominates the total mobility, so the agreement in Fig. 9 does not validate the CE spectral functions. A sensitivity analysis of the Brooks-Herring parameters and their relation to the experimental samples is needed before drawing quantitative conclusions.
  3. [Appendix D and Sec. IV.3] The double-grid convergence test is shown only for electron mobility in n-type Si (Fig. D1). The p-type mobilities, which are a principal result, involve the degenerate VBM of Si and Ge, and the text itself acknowledges that linear interpolation 'cannot handle band (anti)crossings.' No equivalent convergence test is presented for hole transport. Additionally, Sec. III states that the Kubo formula is used in the diagonal approximation for the velocity operator, which is not generally adequate for degenerate VBM bands. These issues leave the quantitative p-type mobility results insufficiently supported.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference [22] is incomplete: it lacks authors and a full title. Reference [31] is cited in the text as 'Jae-Mo et al.' but the reference list gives Lihm and Poncé; please correct the in-text citation.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] Caption contains a typo: 'for for p-type doping levels' should read 'for p-type doping levels.'
  3. [Sec. IV.2] The sentence 'Both atoms exhibit the same |Vq|' is unclear. Please clarify whether the two sublattice atoms are symmetry-equivalent or whether the statement refers only to the chosen displacement direction.
  4. [Sec. II.2.2, Eq. (9)] The definition of β_nk(ω) with an absolute value of ImΣ is standard, but the sign convention and the integration range for ω could be stated explicitly, since the satellite placement in CE depends on the relative sign of β for positive and negative ω.
  5. [Sec. I / Abstract] The term 'nonpolaron' is used throughout without a crisp definition. Please define it explicitly when Emin's work is cited, distinguishing it from dipolar polarons and from the interaction-range crossover discussed in Sec. IV.2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central spectral and transport results are computed from first-principles DFPT self-energies; self-citations and the empirical impurity model are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is: DFPT electron-phonon matrix elements and phonon energies → Fan-Migdal self-energy (Eqs. 1–3) → cumulant spectral function (Eqs. 7–10) → Kubo-Greenwood mobility (Eq. 12). Each step is a first-principles computation, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Doping enters through the Fermi occupations in Eq. (3), so the reported doping-induced broadening and n-/p-type selectivity are genuine consequences of the input self-energy, not a fit. The Brooks–Herring impurity mobility (Eq. 15) is explicitly described as 'experimentally motivated' and 'empirical'; it is an adjunct for benchmarking, not an output passed off as a purely first-principles prediction. The satellite position near ωLO is a formal property of the cumulant ansatz, but the material-dependent satellite intensities, temperature broadening, and mobility trends are outputs of the calculated e-ph matrix elements. Self-citations (Refs. 13, 22, 38–39) provide background on diamond quadrupoles and interpolation techniques; the Si/Ge results are recomputed here, and convergence is demonstrated in Appendices B and D. The undoped-matrix-element assumption at high doping and the undocumented impurity-model parameters are correctness/limitation concerns, not circularity. No equation reduces to its own input, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim is imported from prior work. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central spectral claims rest on standard many-body approximations (Fan-Migdal self-energy, second-order cumulant, Kubo-Greenwood) applied to DFPT data, plus domain assumptions about screening and interpolation. The mobility comparison further depends on an empirically parameterized Brooks-Herring impurity model. No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Broadening parameter eta = 1 meV
    Chosen in Appendix B as the best compromise between spectral resolution and numerical noise; affects satellite visibility and linewidths.
  • Brillouin-zone q-grid size N = 160 for Si, 120 for Ge
    Selected to converge the imaginary part of the CBM self-energy to 0.4% (Si) and 0.5% (Ge); VBM convergence and full spectral details are less thoroughly tested.
  • Brooks-Herring screening parameters = From experimental mobility datasets / literature
    Section IV.3 uses an experimentally motivated ionized-impurity model to obtain total mobilities; specific screening lengths and compensation values are not given and are not derived from first principles.
  • Double-grid coarse q mesh = Ncoarse=40
    Appendix D adopts a coarse grid of 40 for electron-phonon matrix elements and a fine grid of 120 for energies; mobility results depend on this interpolation choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Second-order cumulant expansion provides sufficient accuracy for spectral functions in weakly coupled Si and Ge (Eqs. 7-10).
    The entire spectral analysis relies on this; the paper justifies it by prior polaronic and diamond studies, not by a controlled test in Si/Ge at high temperatures and doping.
  • standard math Fan-Migdal self-energy with Debye-Waller term and rigid-ion acoustic sum rule gives correct e-ph matrix elements (Eqs. 1-3).
    Standard MBPT ingredient used throughout, with DFPT inputs from ABINIT.
  • domain assumption Kubo-Greenwood formula with diagonal velocity approximation is adequate for mobility in Si and Ge (Eq. 12).
    The paper notes the diagonal approximation is adequate for isolated transport bands, but Si and Ge have degenerate valence band extrema where off-diagonal terms may matter.
  • domain assumption Free-carrier screening does not renormalize short-range e-ph matrix elements at high doping.
    Stated in Section IV.1.2 and used to justify rigid-band doping with unchanged e-ph couplings; if false, doping trends would change.
  • domain assumption Brooks-Herring model with literature screening parameters describes ionized impurity scattering (Eq. 15).
    Needed to match measured mobilities at high doping; the model and parameters are empirical rather than derived from the first-principles framework.
  • domain assumption Linear interpolation of e-ph matrix elements on the double grid is accurate except near band crossings (Appendix D).
    The paper explicitly admits the interpolation cannot handle band anti-crossings, which could affect hole mobility in degenerate valence bands.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopy and transport of nonpolarons in silicon and germanium: the influence of doping and temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOGNWQGD

@misc{pith2026250910192,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopy and transport of nonpolarons in silicon and germanium: the influence of doping and temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOGNWQGD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10192}
}
read the original abstract

We perform a first-principles investigation of electron-phonon interactions in silicon and germanium, uncovering distinct non-polaronic spectral and transport fingerprints in these archetypal covalent semiconductors. Using many-body perturbation theory with the retarded cumulant expansion, we compute quasiparticle energies, lifetimes, and phonon satellites beyond the Dyson-Migdal approximation. Short-range crystal fields dominate coupling in both materials, yet their low-temperature spectral fingerprints differ: Si exhibits well-resolved satellites at both band edges, whereas Ge displays strong sidebands mainly at the valence band maximum (VBM) and much weaker features at the conduction band minimum (CBM). Phonon-induced satellites in both materials broaden and merge with the quasiparticle peak at elevated temperatures. Doping broadens peaks and compresses satellite-quasiparticle separation, with n-type carriers affecting the CBM and p-type the VBM. Mobility calculations, combining cumulant-derived phonon scattering with experimentally motivated ionized-impurity scattering models, reproduce measured trends and reveal Ge's consistently higher mobilities than Si, stemming from lighter effective masses and weaker coupling. These results link band-edge asymmetries and phonon energetics to measurable transport differences, providing a unified framework for predicting mobility in nonpolar semiconductors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10192 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spectral functions for silicon (Si) and germanium (Ge) are shown in panels (a)–(d), computed at the CBM and VBM for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Silicon spectral functions calculated at the CBM for n-type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Silicon spectral functions calculated at the VBM for for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Unit-cell averaged absolute values of the total DFPT scat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Variation of (a) electron mobility ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison of electron mobility ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Electron ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jacoboni and P

    C. Jacoboni and P. Lugli, The Monte Carlo Method for Semi- conductor Device Simulation (Springer, 1989)

    1989

  2. [2]

    D. L. Rode, Low-field electron transport, in Semiconductors and Semimetals , Vol. 10 (Academic Press, 1975) pp. 1–89

    1975

  3. [3]

    C. Canali et al., Electron and hole drift velocity measurements in silicon and their empirical relation to electric field and tem- perature, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 22, 1045 (1975)

    1975

  4. [4]

    P. P. Debye and E. M. Conwell, Mobility of electrons in ger- manium, Physical Review 87, 1131–1132 (1952)

    1952

  5. [5]

    V. A. Johnson and K. Lark-Horovitz, Electronic mobility in germanium, Physical Review 79, 409–410 (1950)

    1950

  6. [6]

    Koenig and G

    S. Koenig and G. Gunther-Mohr, The low temperature electri- cal conductivity of n-type germanium, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 2, 268–283 (1957)

    1957

  7. [7]

    S. H. Koenig, R. D. Brown, and W. Schillinger, Electrical con- duction in n-type germanium at low temperatures, Physical Review 128, 1668–1696 (1962)

    1962

  8. [8]

    F. J. Morin and J. P. Maita, Conductivity and hall effect in the intrinsic range of germanium, Physical Review 94, 1525–1529 (1954)

    1954

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    E. Pop, S. Sinha, and K. E. Goodson, Heat generation and transport in nanometer-scale transistors, Proceedings of the IEEE 94, 1587 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    O. M. Nayfeh et al., Effects of high fields on electron transport in nanoscale silicon devices, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 52, 2003 (2005)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Frohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics 3, 325 (1954)

    H. Frohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics 3, 325 (1954)

    1954

  4. [12]

    Emin, Polaron mechanisms for multiphonon-assisted hop- ping of small polarons, Solid State Communications 70, 127 (1989)

    D. Emin, Polaron mechanisms for multiphonon-assisted hop- ping of small polarons, Solid State Communications 70, 127 (1989)

    1989

  5. [13]

    J. C. Abreu, J. P. Nery, M. Giantomassi, X. Gonze, and M. J. Verstraete, Spectroscopic signatures of nonpolarons : the case of diamond, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 12580 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    A. B. Migdal, Interaction between electrons and lattice vibra- tions in a normal metal, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 1438 (1958)

    1958

  7. [15]

    F. J. Dyson, The s matrix in quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 75, 1736 (1949)

    1949

  8. [16]

    Guzzo, J

    M. Guzzo, J. Kas, F. Sottile, M. Silly, F. Sirotti, J. Rehr, and L. Reining, Excitonic effects in x-ray absorption spectroscopy, European Physical Journal B 85, 324 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Caruso and F

    F. Caruso and F. Giustino, Ab initio calculation of the exci- tonic absorption spectrum of silicon, Physical Review B: Con- densed Matter and Materials Physics 92, 045123 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    J. J. Kas, J. J. Rehr, and J. A. Soininen, Cumulant expansion approach for the simulation of inelastic losses in x-ray absorp- tion spectra, Physical Review B 90, 085112 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Aryasetiawan, L

    F. Aryasetiawan, L. Hedin, and K. Karlsson, Electronic struc- ture of solids: The gw method, Physical Review Letters 77, 2268 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    Gumhalter, V

    B. Gumhalter, V. Kov´ aˇ c, and B. Sundaram, Cumulant ex- pansion methods for describing electron-phonon interactions in solids, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 155601 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    J. P. Nery, P. B. Allen, G. Antonius, L. Reining, A. Miglio, and X. Gonze, Quasiparticles and phonon satellites in spectral func- tions of semiconductors and insulators: Cumulants applied to the full first-principles theory and the fr¨ ohlich polaron, Physi- cal Review B 97, 1...

    2018

  14. [22]

    Polaronic effects in diamond: Non-polar material studies, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Mishchenko, N

    A. Mishchenko, N. Prokof’ev, A. Sakamoto, and B. Svistunov, Electron-phonon interactions and coupled charge-lattice dy- namics in a polaron model: A study with diagrammatic monte carlo, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 62, 6317 (2000)

    2000

  16. [24]

    Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, J

    R. Kubo, Generalized cumulant expansion method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17, 1100 (1962)

    1962

  17. [25]

    Gunnarsson, V

    O. Gunnarsson, V. Meden, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Photoemis- sion spectra of one-dimensional luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 50, 10462 (1994)

    1994

  18. [26]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer, Boston, 2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Antonius, S

    G. Antonius, S. Ponc´ e, E. Lantagne-Hurtubise, G. Auclair, X. Gonze, and M. Cˆ ot´ e, Theory of the zero-point renormal- ization of the optical gap of diamond, silicon, and germa- nium, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 92, 085137 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Hedin, Effects of recoil on shake-up spectra in metals, Phys- ica Scripta 21, 477–480 (1980)

    L. Hedin, Effects of recoil on shake-up spectra in metals, Phys- ica Scripta 21, 477–480 (1980)

    1980

  21. [29]

    Guzzo, G

    M. Guzzo, G. Lani, F. Sottile, P. Romaniello, M. Gatti, J. J. Kas, J. J. Rehr, M. G. Silly, F. Sirotti, and L. Reining, Va- lence electron photoemission spectrum of semiconductors:ab initiodescription of multiple satellites, Physical Review Letters 107, 10.1103/physrevlett.107...

    2011 doi

  22. [30]

    Gumhalter, Ultrafast dynamics and decoherence of quasi- particles in surface bands: Development of the formalism, Physical Review B 72, 10.1103/physrevb.72.165406 (2005)

    B. Gumhalter, Ultrafast dynamics and decoherence of quasi- particles in surface bands: Development of the formalism, Physical Review B 72, 10.1103/physrevb.72.165406 (2005)

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    Lihm and S

    J.-M. Lihm and S. Ponc´ e, Beyond-quasiparticles transport with vertex correction: self-consistent ladder formalism for electron- phonon interactions (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Zhou and M

    J.-J. Zhou and M. Bernardi, Predicting charge transport in the presence of polarons: The beyond-quasiparticle regime in srtio3, Physical Review Research 1, 10.1103/physrevre- search.1.033138 (2019)

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Verdi, F

    C. Verdi, F. Caruso, and F. Giustino, Origin of the crossover from polarons to fermi liquids in transition metal oxides, Na- ture Communications 8, 10.1038/ncomms15769 (2017)

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    Brooks, Scattering by ionized impurities in semiconductors, Physical Review 83 (1951)

    H. Brooks, Scattering by ionized impurities in semiconductors, Physical Review 83 (1951)

    1951

  27. [35]

    M. J. Verstraete, J. Abreu, G. E. Allemand, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, M. Azizi, L. Baguet, C. Barat, L. Bastogne, R. Bejaud, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, A. Blanchet, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, J. Bouquiaux, E. Bousquet, J. Boust, F. Brieuc, V. Brousseau-Couture, N. B. F. Bruneval, A. C...

    2025

  28. [36]

    Gonze, B

    X. Gonze, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, F. Arnardi, L. Baguet, J.-M. Beuken, J. Bieder, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, E. Bous- quet, N. Brouwer, F. Bruneval, G. Brunin, T. Cavignac, J.- B. Charraud, W. Chen, M. Cˆ ot´ e, S. Cottenier, J. Denier, G. Geneste, P. Ghosez, M. Giantomassi, Y. Gi...

    2020

  29. [37]

    A. H. Romero, D. C. Allan, B. Amadon, G. Antonius, T. App- lencourt, L. Baguet, J. Bieder, F. Bottin, J. Bouchet, E. Bous- quet, F. Bruneval, G. Brunin, D. Caliste, M. Cˆ ot´ e, J. Denier, C. Dreyer, P. Ghosez, M. Giantomassi, Y. Gillet, O. Gingras, D. R. Hamann, G. Hautier, F...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Brunin, H

    G. Brunin, H. P. C. Miranda, M. Giantomassi, M. Royo, M. Stengel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hautier, Electron-phonon beyond fr¨ ohlich: Dynami- cal quadrupoles in polar and covalent solids, Physical Review Letters 125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.136601 (2020)

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    Brunin, H

    G. Brunin, H. P. C. Miranda, M. Giantomassi, M. Royo, M. Stengel, M. J. Verstraete, X. Gonze, G.-M. Rignanese, and G. Hautier, Phonon-limited electron mobility in si, gaas, and gap with exact treatment of dynamical quadrupoles, Physical Review B 102, 10.1103/physrevb.102.094308 (2020)

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Eiguren and C

    A. Eiguren and C. Ambrosch-Draxl, Wannier interpolation scheme for phonon-induced potentials: Application to bulk mgb2, w, and the (1 ×1) h-covered w(110) surface, Physical Review B 78, 10.1103/physrevb.78.045124 (2008)

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    M. E. Levinshtein, S. L. Rumyantsev, and M. S. Shur, eds., Properties of Advanced Semiconductor Materials (John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 2001)

    2001

  34. [42]

    W. H. Sio, C. Verdi, S. Ponc´ e, and F. Giustino, Ab initiotheory of polarons: Formalism and applications, Physical Review B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.235139 (2019)

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    F. M. Peeters and J. T. Devreese, Acoustical polaron in three dimensions: The ground-state energy and the self-trapping transition, Physical Review B 32, 3515–3521 (1985)

    1985

  36. [44]

    Jacoboni, C

    C. Jacoboni, C. Canali, G. Ottaviani, and A. Alberigi Quar- anta, A review of some charge transport properties of silicon, Solid-State Electronics 20, 77–89 (1977)

    1977

  37. [45]

    Mousty, P

    F. Mousty, P. Ostoja, and L. Passari, Relationship between resistivity and phosphorus concentration in silicon, Journal of Applied Physics 45, 4576–4580 (1974)

    1974

  38. [46]

    Norton, T

    P. Norton, T. Braggins, and H. Levinstein, Impurity and lattice scattering parameters as determined from hall and mobility analysis in silicon, Physical Review B 8, 5632–5653 (1973)

    1973

  39. [47]

    Ottaviani, L

    G. Ottaviani, L. Reggiani, C. Canali, F. Nava, and A. Alberigi- Quaranta, Hole drift velocity in silicon, Physical Review B 12, 3318–3329 (1975)

    1975

  40. [48]

    R. A. Logan and A. J. Peters, Impurity effects upon mobility in silicon, Journal of Applied Physics 31, 122–124 (1960)

    1960

  41. [49]

    Jacoboni, F

    C. Jacoboni, F. Nava, C. Canali, and G. Ottaviani, Electron drift velocity and diffusivity in germanium, Physical Review B 24, 1014–1026 (1981)

    1981

  42. [50]

    P. P. Debye and E. M. Conwell, Electrical properties n-type germanium, Physical Review 93, 693–706 (1954)

    1954

  43. [51]

    W. G. Spitzer, F. A. Trumbore, and R. A. Logan, Properties of heavily doped n-type germanium, Journal of Applied Physics 32, 1822–1830 (1961)

    1961

  44. [52]

    van Setten, M

    M. van Setten, M. Giantomassi, E. Bousquet, M. Verstraete, D. Hamann, X. Gonze, and G.-M. Rignanese, The pseu- dodojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm- conserving pseudopotential table, Computer Physics Commu- nications 226, 39–54 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradi- ent approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  46. [54]

    Tran and P

    F. Tran and P. Blaha, Accurate band gaps of semiconductors and insulators with a semilocal exchange-correlation potential, Physical Review Letters 102, 10.1103/physrevlett.102.226401 (2009)

    2009 doi

  47. [55]

    J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems, Physical Review B 23, 5048–5079 (1981)

    1981

  48. [56]

    J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Accurate and simple analytic rep- resentation of the electron-gas correlation energy, Physical Re- view B 45, 13244–13249 (1992)

    1992

  49. [57]

    P. J. Collings, Simple measurement of the band gap in sili- con and germanium, American Journal of Physics 48, 197–199 (1980)

    1980

  50. [58]

    B. D. Sukheeja, Measurement of the band gap in silicon and germanium, American Journal of Physics 51, 72–72 (1983)

    1983

  51. [59]

    M. A. Green, Intrinsic concentration, effective densities of states, and effective mass in silicon, Journal of Applied Physics 67, 2944 (1990)

    1990

  52. [60]

    Bludau, A

    W. Bludau, A. Onton, and W. Heinke, Temperature depen- dence of the band gap of silicon and germanium, Journal of Applied Physics 45, 1846 (1974)

    1974

  53. [61]

    Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004)

    O. Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004)

    2004

  54. [62]

    Gonze, P

    X. Gonze, P. Boulanger, and M. Cˆ ot´ e, Theoretical approaches to the temperature and zero-point motion effects on the electronic band structure, Annalen der Physik 523, 168–178 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Ponc´ e, Y

    S. Ponc´ e, Y. Gillet, J. Laflamme Janssen, A. Marini, M. Verstraete, and X. Gonze, Temperature depen- dence of the electronic structure of semiconductors and insulators, The Journal of Chemical Physics 143, 102813 (2015), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/...

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.