pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.10433 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-12 · 📡 eess.SP

Robust Localization in Modern Cellular Networks using Global Map Features

Junshi Chen , Xuhong Li , Russ Whiton , Erik Leitinger , Fredrik Tufvesson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords RF localizationMP-SLAMglobal map featuresPHD filtermultipath propagationcellular networksurban localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating a global map feature repository into MP-SLAM using a PHD filter enables robust localization in modern cellular networks under challenging conditions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that collecting consistent map features during earlier passes and reusing them in the current localization process through a PHD filter leads to better performance in environments with obstructed signals and multipath effects. This would matter if true because many positioning systems struggle in cities where buildings block direct paths and create confusing signal bounces. A reader might see value in a technique that turns past observations into ongoing help for present location estimates without extra hardware. The approach targets practical use in 5G and future networks where signal quality varies.

Core claim

The central claim is that an extended MP-SLAM method augmented with a global map feature repository, where consistent high-quality map features are stored and integrated back via a PHD filter propagating intensity functions, achieves robust and accurate localization using LTE RF signals in a dense urban scenario with severe multipath propagation and inter-cell interference, outperforming conventional proprioceptive sensor-based localization and standard MP-SLAM methods.

What carries the argument

Global map feature repository of prior consistent map features, integrated via PHD filter into the multipath SLAM process.

If this is right

  • Robust localization holds in obstructed line-of-sight and multipath conditions.
  • Outperforms proprioceptive sensor-based localization.
  • Outperforms conventional MP-SLAM methods.
  • Achieves reliable results even under adverse signal conditions in 5G or 6G networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Localization accuracy might improve further if the repository is updated dynamically with new high-quality features.
  • This method could apply to other wireless networks beyond cellular, such as Wi-Fi in indoor settings.
  • Testing in scenarios with moving obstacles or seasonal changes would reveal how stable the global features need to be.

Load-bearing premise

High-quality map features gathered in earlier traversals stay consistent and useful enough to be propagated by the PHD filter in later runs despite environmental variations.

What would settle it

Conducting the real-world LTE experiment in the dense urban area and finding that localization errors match or exceed those of conventional MP-SLAM methods would falsify the claim of improved robustness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10433 by Erik Leitinger, Fredrik Tufvesson, Junshi Chen, Russ Whiton, Xuhong Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The system diagram of the proposed framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geometric illustration of the synthetic simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results of a simulation run using synthetic measurements at SNR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results for synthetic measurements. The MOSPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Block diagram of the measurement system, includ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Results for synthetic measurements. The RMSEs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Map of central Lund, Sweden, depicting the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Results for real RF measurements. The RIMAX channel estimator is applied to the received RF signals after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Results for real RF measurements. A zoomed-in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Results for real RF measurements. Cumulative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Results for real RF measurements. For a con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Results for real RF measurements in central Lund. Here, lap 1 and lap 2 use filled and empty marks, respectively. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Factor graph representation of the factorized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Radio frequency (RF) signal-based localization using modern cellular networks has emerged as a promising solution to accurately locate objects in challenging environments. One of the most promising solutions for situations involving obstructed-line-of-sight (OLoS) and multipath propagation is multipathbased simultaneous localization and mapping (MP-SLAM) that employs map features (MFs), such as virtual anchors. This paper presents an extended MP-SLAM method that is augmented with a global map feature (GMF) repository. This repository stores consistent MFs of high quality that are collected during prior traversals. We integrate these GMFs back into the MP-SLAM framework via a probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter, which propagates GMF intensity functions over time. Extensive simulations, together with a challenging real-world experiment using LTE RF signals in a dense urban scenario with severe multipath propagation and inter-cell interference, demonstrate that our framework achieves robust and accurate localization, thereby showcasing its effectiveness in realistic modern cellular networks such as 5G or future 6G networks. It outperforms conventional proprioceptive sensor-based localization and conventional MP-SLAM methods, and achieves reliable localization even under adverse signal conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an extension to multipath-based SLAM (MP-SLAM) that augments the framework with a global map feature (GMF) repository. Consistent, high-quality map features (e.g., virtual anchors) collected during prior traversals are stored in the repository and re-integrated into the localization process via a probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter that propagates the associated intensity functions over time. The central claim, supported by extensive simulations and one real-world LTE experiment in a dense urban setting with severe multipath and inter-cell interference, is that the resulting system achieves robust and accurate localization, outperforms both proprioceptive-sensor baselines and conventional MP-SLAM, and remains reliable under adverse signal conditions.

Significance. If the performance claims hold after the requested clarifications, the work would provide a practical mechanism for exploiting historical RF map data to mitigate the well-known difficulties of multipath and OLoS in cellular localization. The combination of a persistent GMF repository with PHD propagation is a natural and potentially impactful augmentation of existing MP-SLAM methods, and the use of real LTE measurements in a challenging urban environment adds concrete relevance for 5G/6G applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Real-world experiment section] Real-world experiment section: the manuscript does not state the temporal separation (in hours, days, or weeks) between the traversals used to populate the GMF repository and the evaluation traversal, nor does it describe any controlled introduction of dynamic scatterers. Because the central robustness claim rests on the PHD filter successfully propagating GMF intensity functions under time-varying multipath, the absence of explicit temporal or environmental variation leaves the key assumption untested.
  2. [Results presentation (tables/figures)] Results presentation (tables/figures): quantitative localization-error metrics are reported without error bars, confidence intervals, number of independent trials, or explicit data-exclusion rules. This prevents assessment of whether the reported outperformance margins are statistically reliable and therefore weakens the strength of the empirical support for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [PHD filter formulation] The update equations for the GMF intensity function inside the PHD filter would benefit from an explicit side-by-side comparison with the standard MP-SLAM intensity update to clarify what is new.
  2. [Simulation figures] Figure legends should explicitly label each curve with the corresponding method (GMF-PHD, baseline MP-SLAM, proprioceptive only) rather than relying on color alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate in the next version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Real-world experiment section] Real-world experiment section: the manuscript does not state the temporal separation (in hours, days, or weeks) between the traversals used to populate the GMF repository and the evaluation traversal, nor does it describe any controlled introduction of dynamic scatterers. Because the central robustness claim rests on the PHD filter successfully propagating GMF intensity functions under time-varying multipath, the absence of explicit temporal or environmental variation leaves the key assumption untested.

    Authors: We agree that explicit details on temporal separation and environmental dynamics are necessary to substantiate the robustness claims. In the revised manuscript we will add these specifics to the real-world experiment section: the traversals used to populate the GMF repository were performed one week prior to the evaluation traversal, and the experiment occurred in a live dense urban setting containing natural dynamic scatterers (vehicles and pedestrians) without any additional controlled introduction of scatterers. This description will clarify how the PHD filter propagation was tested under realistic time-varying multipath conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results presentation (tables/figures)] Results presentation (tables/figures): quantitative localization-error metrics are reported without error bars, confidence intervals, number of independent trials, or explicit data-exclusion rules. This prevents assessment of whether the reported outperformance margins are statistically reliable and therefore weakens the strength of the empirical support for the central claim.

    Authors: We concur that statistical measures are required for a rigorous assessment of the reported performance gains. We will revise the results section and associated tables/figures to include error bars (standard deviation) and 95% confidence intervals for all simulation-based metrics, which were obtained from 50 independent Monte Carlo trials. We will also state the data-exclusion rules applied (e.g., discarding runs with total signal outage). For the single real-world LTE traversal, which serves as a representative case study rather than a statistical ensemble, we will explicitly note this limitation and discuss its implications for statistical reliability. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: performance claims rest on external experimental validation rather than self-referential definitions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper augments MP-SLAM with a GMF repository collected from prior traversals and propagated via PHD filter, then reports localization accuracy from separate simulations and a real-world LTE experiment in dense urban conditions. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce the reported outperformance to quantities defined by the same repository data or prior author results by construction. The central claims are supported by independent experimental outcomes rather than internal redefinitions, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the ability to collect and maintain a reusable set of map features across multiple traversals and on the PHD filter correctly propagating their intensity functions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Consistent high-quality map features can be identified and stored from prior traversals for later reuse
    This premise is required for the GMF repository to provide benefit over single-session MP-SLAM.
invented entities (1)
  • Global Map Feature (GMF) repository no independent evidence
    purpose: Stores consistent MFs collected during prior traversals for integration into new localization runs
    New component introduced to augment standard MP-SLAM

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5745 in / 1357 out tokens · 40871 ms · 2026-05-18T17:18:40.098690+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Groves,Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, 2nd ed.Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, Mar

    P. Groves,Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, 2nd ed.Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, Mar. 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Braasch,Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation Systems and Aiding

    M. Braasch,Fundamentals of Inertial Navigation Systems and Aiding. London, UK: IET, Jan. 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I,

    H. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, “Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–110, Jun. 2006

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Thrun, W

    S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox,Probabilistic Robotics, ser. Intel- ligent robotics and autonomous agents. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Multipath Assisted Positioning with Simultaneous Localiza- tion and Mapping,

    C. Gentner, T. Jost, W. Wang, S. Zhang, A. Dammann, and U.-C. Fiebig, “Multipath Assisted Positioning with Simultaneous Localiza- tion and Mapping,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 6104–6117, Jun. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    A belief propagation algorithm for multipath-based SLAM,

    E. Leitinger, F. Meyer, F. Hlawatsch, K. Witrisal, F. Tufvesson, and M. Z. Win, “A belief propagation algorithm for multipath-based SLAM,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 5613– 5629, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    PMBM-based SLAM filters in 5G mmWave vehicular networks,

    H. Kim, K. Granstr ¨om, L. Svensson, S. Kim, and H. Wymeersch, “PMBM-based SLAM filters in 5G mmWave vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 8646–8661, May 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Data fusion for multipath-based SLAM: Combining information from multiple propagation paths,

    E. Leitinger, A. Venus, B. Teague, and F. Meyer, “Data fusion for multipath-based SLAM: Combining information from multiple propagation paths,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 71, pp. 4011– 4028, Sept. 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Set-type belief propagation with applications to Poisson multi-Bernoulli SLAM,

    H. Kim, ´A. F. Garca-Fern ´andez, Y . Ge, Y . Xia, L. Svensson, and H. Wymeersch, “Set-type belief propagation with applications to Poisson multi-Bernoulli SLAM,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 1989–2005, Apr. 2024

    work page 1989

  10. [10]

    Batch 14 VOLUME , SLAM with PMBM data association sampling and graph-based opti- mization,

    Y . Ge, O. Kaltiokallio, Y . Xia, A. F. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Kim, J. Talvitie, M. Valkama, H. Wymeersch, and L. Svensson, “Batch 14 VOLUME , SLAM with PMBM data association sampling and graph-based opti- mization,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 73, pp. 2139–2153, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    A belief propagation algorithm for multipath-based SLAM with multiple map features: A mmWave MIMO application,

    X. Li, X. Cai, E. Leitinger, and F. Tufvesson, “A belief propagation algorithm for multipath-based SLAM with multiple map features: A mmWave MIMO application,” inProc. IEEE ICC 2024, Aug. 2024, pp. 269–275

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Direct multipath-based SLAM,

    M. Liang, E. Leitinger, and F. Meyer, “Direct multipath-based SLAM,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 74, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Exploiting diffuse multipath in 5G SLAM,

    Y . Ge, H. Kim, F. Wen, L. Svensson, S. Kim, and H. Wymeersch, “Exploiting diffuse multipath in 5G SLAM,” inIEEE Global Commun. Conf., Dec. 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Multipath- based SLAM for non-ideal reflective surfaces exploiting multiple- measurement data association,

    L. Wielandner, A. Venus, T. Wilding, and E. Leitinger, “Multipath- based SLAM for non-ideal reflective surfaces exploiting multiple- measurement data association,”J. Adv. Inf. Fusion, vol. 18, pp. 59–77, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    MIMO multipath-based SLAM for non-ideal reflective surfaces,

    L. Wielandner, A. Venus, T. Wilding, K. Witrisal, and E. Leitinger, “MIMO multipath-based SLAM for non-ideal reflective surfaces,” in Proc. Fusion-2024, Venice, Italy, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Joint vehicular localization and reflective mapping based on team channel-SLAM,

    X. Chu, Z. Lu, D. Gesbert, L. Wang, X. Wen, M. Wu, and M. Li, “Joint vehicular localization and reflective mapping based on team channel-SLAM,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 7957–7974, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Adaptive multipath-based SLAM for distributed MIMO systems,

    X. Li, B. Deutschmann, E. Leitinger, and F. Meyer, “Adaptive multipath-based SLAM for distributed MIMO systems,” 2025, arXiv. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21798

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem,

    M. Dissanayake, P. Newman, S. Clark, H. Durrant-Whyte, and M. Csorba, “A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem,”IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 229–241, Jun. 2001

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    FastSLAM: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem,

    M. Montemerlo, S. Thrun, D. Koller, and B. Wegbreit, “FastSLAM: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem,” inProc. 18th Nat. Conf. Artif. Intell., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2002, pp. 593–598

    work page 2002

  20. [20]

    Joint CKF-PHD filter and map fusion for 5G multi-cell SLAM,

    H. Kim, K. Granstr ¨om, L. Gao, G. Battistelli, S. Kim, and H. Wymeer- sch, “Joint CKF-PHD filter and map fusion for 5G multi-cell SLAM,” inProc. IEEE Int. Commun. Conf., 2020, pp. 1–6

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    An introduction to factor graphs,

    H.-A. Loeliger, “An introduction to factor graphs,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 28–41, Feb. 2004

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm,

    F. Kschischang, B. Frey, and H.-A. Loeliger, “Factor graphs and the sum-product algorithm,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 498–519, Feb. 2001

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    Multipath-based SLAM exploiting AoA and amplitude information,

    E. Leitinger, S. Grebien, and K. Witrisal, “Multipath-based SLAM exploiting AoA and amplitude information,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops, Shanghai, China, May 2019, pp. 1–7

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Sequential detection and estimation of multipath channel parameters using belief propaga- tion,

    X. Li, E. Leitinger, A. Venus, and F. Tufvesson, “Sequential detection and estimation of multipath channel parameters using belief propaga- tion,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 8385–8402, Apr. 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Intercell interference coordination for LTE systems,

    D. Lee, G. Y . Li, and S. Tang, “Intercell interference coordination for LTE systems,”IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 4408– 4420, May 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Robust UE receiver with interference cancellation in LTE advanced heterogeneous network,

    B. E. Priyanto, S. Kant, F. Rusek, S. Hu, J. Chen, and C. Wugengshi, “Robust UE receiver with interference cancellation in LTE advanced heterogeneous network,” inProc. IEEE 78th V eh. Technol. Conf., Las Vegas, NV , USA, 2013, pp. 1–7

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    High-resolution channel sounding and parameter estimation in multi-site cellular networks,

    J. Chen, R. Whiton, X. Li, and F. Tufvesson, “High-resolution channel sounding and parameter estimation in multi-site cellular networks,” in Proc. EuCNC/6G Summit, Gothenburg, Sweden, Jun. 2023, pp. 90–95

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Iterative inter- cell interference cancellation receiver for LDPC-coded MIMO sys- tems,

    W.-C. Sun, Y .-T. Chen, C.-H. Yang, and Y .-L. Ueng, “Iterative inter- cell interference cancellation receiver for LDPC-coded MIMO sys- tems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1636–1647, Jan. 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Optimal sensor placement for dilu- tion of precision minimization via quadratically constrained fractional programming,

    J. J. Khalife and Z. Z. M. Kassas, “Optimal sensor placement for dilu- tion of precision minimization via quadratically constrained fractional programming,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2086–2096, Nov. 2019

    work page 2086

  30. [30]

    Dilution of precision in positioning systems using both angle of arrival and time of arrival measurements,

    B. Li, K. Zhao, and X. Shen, “Dilution of precision in positioning systems using both angle of arrival and time of arrival measurements,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 192 506–192 516, Oct. 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Matching maps of physical and virtual radio transmitters using visibility regions,

    M. Ulmschneider, C. Gentner, and A. Dammann, “Matching maps of physical and virtual radio transmitters using visibility regions,” in Proc. IEEE/ION Position, Location Navigation Symp., Oregon, PDX, USA, 2020, pp. 375–382

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Robust position estimation using range measurements from transmitters with inaccurate positions,

    A. Sel, S. Hayek, and Z. M. Kassas, “Robust position estimation using range measurements from transmitters with inaccurate positions,” in Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Inf. Fusion, Venice, Italy, 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Cellular localization for autonomous driving: A function pull approach to safety-critical wireless localization,

    R. Whiton, “Cellular localization for autonomous driving: A function pull approach to safety-critical wireless localization,”IEEE V eh. Tech- nol. Mag., Oct. 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Robust vehicular localization and map matching in urban environments through IMU, GNSS, and cellular signals,

    Z. Z. M. Kassas, M. Maaref, J. J. Morales, J. J. Khalife, and K. Shamei, “Robust vehicular localization and map matching in urban environments through IMU, GNSS, and cellular signals,”IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 36–52, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Indoor positioning using multi-frequency RSS with foot-mounted INS,

    M. Nilsson, J. Rantakokko, M. A. Skoglund, and G. Hendeby, “Indoor positioning using multi-frequency RSS with foot-mounted INS,” in Proc. 2014 Int. Conf. Indoor Positioning Indoor Navig., 2014, pp. 177–186

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Molisch,Wireless Communications: From Fundamentals to Beyond 5G

    A. Molisch,Wireless Communications: From Fundamentals to Beyond 5G. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, Nov. 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Massive MIMO ex- tensions to the COST 2100 channel model: Modeling and validation,

    J. Flordelis, X. Li, O. Edfors, and F. Tufvesson, “Massive MIMO ex- tensions to the COST 2100 channel model: Modeling and validation,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 380–394, Oct. 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    R. P. S. Mahler,Statistical Multisource-Multitarget Information Fu- sion. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Hybrid Poisson and multi-Bernoulli filters,

    J. L. Williams, “Hybrid Poisson and multi-Bernoulli filters,” in15th Int. Conf. Inf. Fusion, Singapore, 2012, pp. 1103–1110

    work page 2012

  40. [40]

    Super- resolution estimation of UWB channels including the dense component – An SBL-inspired approach,

    S. Grebien, E. Leitinger, K. Witrisal, and B. H. Fleury, “Super- resolution estimation of UWB channels including the dense component – An SBL-inspired approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 301–10 318, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Estimation of Radio Channel Parameters, Models and Algorithms,

    A. Richter, “Estimation of Radio Channel Parameters, Models and Algorithms,” Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universitt Ilmenau, Ger- many, 2005

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Enhanced effective aperture distribution function for characterizing large-scale antenna arrays,

    X. Cai, M. Zhu, A. Fedorov, and F. Tufvesson, “Enhanced effective aperture distribution function for characterizing large-scale antenna arrays,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 6869–6877, Jun. 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation,

    3GPP, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical channels and modulation,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TS 36.211, Mar. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/36211.htm

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Variational inference of structured line spectra exploiting group-sparsity,

    J. M ¨oderl, F. Pernkopf, K. Witrisal, and E. Leitinger, “Variational inference of structured line spectra exploiting group-sparsity,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Message passing algorithms for scalable multitarget tracking,

    F. Meyer, T. Kropfreiter, J. L. Williams, R. Lau, F. Hlawatsch, P. Braca, and M. Z. Win, “Message passing algorithms for scalable multitarget tracking,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 221–259, Feb. 2018

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    A scalable algorithm for tracking an unknown number of targets using multiple sensors,

    F. Meyer, P. Braca, P. Willett, and F. Hlawatsch, “A scalable algorithm for tracking an unknown number of targets using multiple sensors,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 13, pp. 3478–3493, Jul. 2017

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Approximate evaluation of marginal asso- ciation probabilities with belief propagation,

    J. Williams and R. Lau, “Approximate evaluation of marginal asso- ciation probabilities with belief propagation,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 2942–2959, Oct. 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Using a probabilistic hypothesis den- sity filter to confirm tracks in a multi-target environment,

    P. Horridge and S. Maskell, “Using a probabilistic hypothesis den- sity filter to confirm tracks in a multi-target environment,” inProc. INFORMATIK, Berlin, Germany, 2011, pp. 492–503

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    S. M. Kay,Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-H, 1993

    work page 1993

  50. [50]

    A consistent metric for performance evaluation of multi-object filters,

    D. Schuhmacher, B.-T. V o, and B.-N. V o, “A consistent metric for performance evaluation of multi-object filters,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 3447–3457, Aug. 2008

    work page 2008

  51. [51]

    URSP-2953 - NI,

    National Instruments, “URSP-2953 - NI,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ni.com/sv-se/support/model.usrp-2953.html

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Rubidium frequency standard - FS725,

    Stanford Research Systems, “Rubidium frequency standard - FS725,”

    work page

  53. [53]

    Available: https://www.thinksrs.com/products/fs725

    [Online]. Available: https://www.thinksrs.com/products/fs725. html

    work page

  54. [54]

    RT3000 v3,

    Oxford Technical Solutions Ltd, “RT3000 v3,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxts.com/products/rt3000/

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Multipath- based SLAM for cooperative navigation and map fusion,

    E. Leitinger, L. Wielandner, A. Venus, and K. Witrisal, “Multipath- based SLAM for cooperative navigation and map fusion,” inProc. Asilomar-24, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    A neural- enhanced factor graph-based algorithm for robust positioning in ob- structed LOS situations,

    A. Venus, E. Leitinger, S. Tertinek, and K. Witrisal, “A neural- enhanced factor graph-based algorithm for robust positioning in ob- structed LOS situations,”IEEE Open J. Signal Process., vol. 5, pp. 29–38, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Neural enhanced belief propagation for multiobject tracking,

    M. Liang and F. Meyer, “Neural enhanced belief propagation for multiobject tracking,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 15–30, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Bar-Shalom, P

    Y . Bar-Shalom, P. K. Willett, and X. Tian,Tracking and data fusion: A handbook of algorithms. Storrs, CT, USA: Yaakov Bar-Shalom, 2011. VOLUME , 15

    work page 2011