Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Nanosculpting lateral weak link junctions in superconducting Fe(Te,Se)/Bi2Te3 with focused Si++ ions and implications on vortex pinning

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Focused Si++ ion irradiation of a FeTe0.75Se0.25/Bi2Te3 microbridge creates a controllable lateral weak link whose critical temperature and critical current fall with increasing dose, with irradiation-induced defects also acting as vortex-p

desk verdict Useful dose-dependent transport data for FIB-damaged Fe(Te,Se)/Bi2Te3, but the weak-link claim outruns the evidence—referee worthy with major revision or reframing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10606 v1 pith:ATSZLCF5 submitted 2025-09-12 cond-mat.supr-con

Debarghya Mallick , Sujoy Ghosh , An Hsi Chen , Qiangsheng Lu , Liam Collins , Sangsoo Kim , Gyula Eres , Ivan Kravchenko
show 5 more authors
Stephen Jesse Steven J. Randolph Scott T. Retterer Matthew Brahlek Robert G. Moore
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.25.Wx74.70.Xa85.25.Cp
keywords focusedionbeamweaklinkJosephsonjunctioniron-basedsuperconductorFeTeSe/Bi2Te3heterostructurevortexpinningirradiationcriticalcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a direct-write, all-in-plane way to make a superconducting weak link—the essential element of a Josephson junction—by scanning a focused beam of Si++ ions across a microbridge patterned from a FeTe0.75Se0.25/Bi2Te3 heterostructure. The authors claim that increasing the ion dose in a roughly 150 nm-wide scribed line progressively lowers the critical temperature and critical current, which they take as evidence of a tunable superconductor–normal–superconductor barrier. They also report that the same defects act as vortex-pinning centers, so higher-dose junctions lose critical current more slowly in a magnetic field. If correct, this offers a scalable, lithography-free route to planar Josephson junctions and vortex-pinning engineering in a topological-superconductor candidate material relevant to fault-tolerant qubits.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ion-irradiated strip: a roughly 150 nm-wide line of lattice damage written across the superconducting channel by a focused Si++ beam. The strip carries the argument because its defect density, set by the dose, plays two opposing roles—scattering centers that suppress Tc and Ic, and pinning centers that immobilize vortices and slow the magnetic-field decay of Ic. The dose-dependent behavior is organized around the idea of defect size relative to the superconducting coherence length ξ ≈ 2 nm: low doses create point-like defects that pin effectively, while higher doses form clusters that saturate the suppression and eventually lose pinning efficiency. Ion-trajectory si

What would settle it

Scan the irradiated line with a low-temperature scanning SQUID or a scanning tunneling microscope: if the suppression of superconductivity is spread across the whole channel rather than localized to the written line, the weak-link claim fails. Then apply RF radiation to the junction: genuine Josephson tunneling would produce Shapiro steps at voltages hf/2e, whereas their absence would indicate a resistive weak link rather than Cooper-pair tunneling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using a 70 keV focused Si++ ion beam to write a line across a 5 µm-wide Hall-bar channel in FeTe0.75Se0.25/Bi2Te3, the authors find that superconductivity survives but is progressively weakened as the dose rises from 0 to 200 pC/µm: Tc drops from about 9.5 K to about 8 K, and Ic falls steeply before saturating near 60 pC/µm. They interpret the irradiated strip as a controllable weak link (SC-N-SC), even though no Fraunhofer diffraction pattern is observed, and attribute that absence to the middle region being wide relative to the coherence length. Magnetic-field sweeps show a lower exponent γ in the power law Ic ∼ B−γ for higher-dose devices, which they take as evidence that irradiation-indu

Load-bearing premise

The measured changes in Tc and Ic come from a localized ~150 nm-wide irradiated weak link inside the channel, rather than from unintended global beam damage, channel narrowing, or a fully insulating cut, and the defect-size picture inferred from high-energy heavy-ion irradiation of bulk material transfers to focused 70 keV Si++ ions in a 12 nm film.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Focused Si++ ion nanosculpting can produce a planar, lateral weak link in a topological-superconductor heterostructure without the vertical Al/AlOx/Al stack used in conventional qubit junctions.
  • Dose controls junction strength: increasing dose tunes the barrier from a weakly scattering superconductor–normal–superconductor regime toward a more insulating superconductor–insulator–superconductor regime without fully severing the channel up to 200 pC/µm.
  • The same irradiation writes vortex-pinning sites, so higher-dose junctions sustain a larger fraction of their zero-field critical current in an applied magnetic field.
  • The absence of a Fraunhofer pattern is attributed to the barrier width exceeding the coherence length; thinner or differently tuned barriers should be explored to recover Cooper-pair diffraction and enable SQUID-type devices.
  • Because the sputtering threshold (≈300 pC/µm) and the saturation of superconducting properties (≈60 pC/µm) are well separated, the process has a practical operating window for reproducible device writing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If genuine Josephson coupling is present, a microwave drive should produce Shapiro steps; their absence would instead indicate a resistive (non-tunneling) weak link and would also explain the missing Fraunhofer pattern.
  • The paper's defect-cluster narrative borrows the crossover near 60 pC/µm from heavy-ion irradiation of bulk Fe(Se,Te); a direct low-temperature local probe of the written line, such as scanning SQUID or STM, could confirm that the damage is confined to the intended strip and that order-parameter suppression is local rather than global.
  • The observed saturation above roughly 60 pC/µm could be used as a design rule: devices written in that dose range would be comparatively insensitive to small dose variations, improving junction-to-junction uniformity in arrays.
  • The same approach could be extended beyond single lines to write arbitrary pinning landscapes, tailoring vortex positions for experiments on Majorana zero modes predicted to reside in vortex cores.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports focused Si++ ion-beam irradiation of FeTe0.75Se0.25/Bi2Te3 microbridges, creating a ~150 nm-wide damaged line across a ~5 µm channel. The authors measure resistance versus temperature and current-voltage characteristics as functions of irradiation dose and magnetic field. They find that increasing dose lowers Tc and Ic, and that the power-law exponent γ in Ic ∼ B^{-γ} decreases with dose before saturating. They interpret these observations as evidence for a controllable superconductor-normal-superconductor (SC-N-SC) weak link and for irradiation-induced vortex pinning. The paper also reports SRIM simulations, room-temperature AFM/KPFM, and an in-situ sputtering threshold.

Significance. If the central claims were substantiated, the work would be a useful step toward planar, scalable Josephson junctions and defect-engineered vortex pinning in topological-superconductor candidates. The dose-dependent transport dataset is systematic, and the in-situ measurement of the sputtering threshold is a practical contribution. The manuscript also provides SRIM simulations and surface characterization. However, the evidence presented does not directly establish the claimed weak-link behavior, and the vortex-pinning interpretation is built on a fitted exponent with no independent verification. The paper is better read as a demonstration of local FIB modification with dose-tunable Tc and Ic, not as a confirmed demonstration of an SC-N-SC Josephson junction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §2, Figs. 3 and 5] The central claim that the measured Tc and Ic suppression confirms the creation of a controllable weak link is not supported by the end-to-end transport measurements. The devices are ~5 µm Hall bars with a single ~150 nm irradiated line, and R-T and I-V are measured across the whole bridge. A dose-dependent reduction of Tc and Ic is equally compatible with global beam damage, channel thinning, or a fully normal/insulating cut with current redistributed around the damage. The paper itself acknowledges that no Fraunhofer pattern is observed; no Shapiro steps, SQUID response, or voltage contacts straddling the line are reported. The AFM/KPFM images are taken at room temperature and do not establish that the irradiated strip is the superconducting bottleneck at 2.2 K. An offset-line control device, a second set of contacts spanning only the irradiated region, or a spatial probe would be need
  2. [§2, Fig. 5c-d and 'Microscopy of Fe(Te,Se)...' paragraph] The vortex-pinning interpretation relies entirely on the fitted power-law exponent γ in Ic ∼ B^{-γ}, extracted from whole-bridge critical currents. This is an interpretive parameter, and the slower decay at higher dose may reflect reduced zero-field Ic, a residual resistive component, or the locally suppressed Tc, rather than enhanced pinning by irradiation-induced defects. The further inference that the saturation of γ at ~60 pC/µm marks a crossover from point defects to 2–3 nm clusters is an extrapolation from Ref. [36], which used high-energy Au2+ irradiation of bulk Fe(Se,Te), to focused 70 keV Si2+ in a 12 nm film. No defect imaging of the actual devices is provided; the AFM/KPFM data show a work-function shift but no nanoscale defect morphology. The defect-cluster scenario should be presented as a hypothesis and preferably supported by direct pinning measurements (e.g., magnetizati
  3. [§3 Conclusions] The text alternates between calling the irradiated region a 'weak link' and a 'localized insulating junction.' These are not interchangeable: an insulating barrier would block Cooper-pair tunneling, yet the devices show finite Ic and superconducting-like I-V curves. The absence of a Fraunhofer pattern is attributed to the middle layer width exceeding the coherence length, but no criterion is given for why a pattern would be expected at the observed widths. The manuscript would be strengthened by a clear statement of the barrier regime (metallic, insulating, or resistive) and by specifying the experimental signature that would confirm or refute the weak-link interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typos: 'focusses ion beam' should be 'focused ion beam'; 'Kelvin prove force microscopy' should be 'Kelvin probe force microscopy.' Also, the beam energy is given as 35 kV Si++ with 70 keV landing energy; the abstract and main text should be consistent.
  2. [Introduction and Experimental Section] The channel width is given as '4 µm' in the Introduction and '5 µm' in the Experimental Section and Figure 1c caption. Please reconcile this discrepancy.
  3. [Figure 5d caption] The caption refers to 'the scaling factor' where the text describes the scaling exponent γ. Please use consistent terminology.
  4. [Conclusions] The sentence 'starting from ion dose of ∼150 pC/µm' appears to describe the irradiated line width, not a dose; this is confusing and should be reworded.
  5. [References] Reference [55] is malformed ('T., Wu, L., Zhang, C. et al.') and should be corrected to a standard citation format.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on direct transport measurements and independent external citations, not on self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper's core observations—dose-dependent suppression of Tc and Ic, and a slower field-induced decay of Ic at higher dose—are direct measurements. The power-law exponent γ is extracted by linear fits to Ic(B) data and used as a phenomenological descriptor of vortex-pinning efficacy; it is not a fitted input that is then relabeled as a prediction. The vortex-pinning interpretation is an inference from these fits, and the defect-size crossover is explicitly assumed by analogy to an external study (Ref. [36], Massee et al., Science Advances 2015), not derived from the present data in a circular way. The film growth and heterostructure properties are cited from prior work, including some self-citations (Refs. [18], [21], [22], [23]), but these are methodological or background and do not carry the derivation of the irradiation effect. The paper explicitly concedes the absence of a Fraunhofer pattern (Abstract and Conclusions), so the weak-link claim is not presented as a directly verified prediction but as an interpretation of the observed suppression. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a verified result. The saturation of Tc, Ic, and γ at ~60 pC/µm is an empirical observation, subsequently rationalized by an assumed defect-size crossover—this is a hypothesis, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on interpreting transport data through assumed defect physics: a local weak link without direct Josephson signatures, a defect-size evolution borrowed from Au2+-irradiated bulk Fe(Se,Te), and a qualitative vortex-creep model. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • γ, the dose-dependent power-law exponent in Ic ∼ B^{−γ} = not tabulated in text; extracted from linear fits in Fig. 5c,d
    Each device's Ic(B) is fit to a power law, and the dose dependence of γ is the quantitative basis for the vortex-pinning claim.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper A local reduction of Tc and Ic measured across the whole Hall bar is taken as evidence of a SC-N-SC weak link even though no Fraunhofer pattern is observed.
    Abstract and Section 2: the central interpretation. A purely resistive damaged barrier is a plausible alternative.
  • domain assumption The defect landscape from high-energy Au2+ irradiation of bulk Fe(Se,Te) (Ref 36) transfers to focused 70 keV Si2+ in a 12 nm film, including point defects at low dose and clusters at high dose.
    Results section: 'Assuming a comparable defect profile for our thin-film geometry...' and the explanation of the ~60 pC/µm crossover.
  • domain assumption SRIM simulation of ion trajectories in an amorphous target approximates the real crystalline heterostructure.
    Experimental section, SRIM paragraph: 'this approximation does not significantly alter the qualitative picture of the ion trajectories.'
  • domain assumption The exponent γ in Ic ∼ B^{−γ} is a qualitative measure of vortex creep and pinning: steeper decay means more creep, slower decay means more pinning.
    Figure 4c and Figure 5c,d discussion, following Refs 37 and 48.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nanosculpting lateral weak link junctions in superconducting Fe(Te,Se)/Bi2Te3 with focused Si++ ions and implications on vortex pinning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ATSZLCF5

@misc{pith2026250910606,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nanosculpting lateral weak link junctions in superconducting Fe(Te,Se)/Bi2Te3 with focused Si++ ions and implications on vortex pinning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ATSZLCF5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10606}
}
read the original abstract

Superconductor-normal-superconductor (SC-N-SC) weak links enable Cooper-pair tunneling and serve as Josephson junctions (JJs) used in modern superconducting qubits. Conventional JJs rely on vertically stacked Al-AlOx-Al trilayers that are difficult to fabricate and are sensitive to ambient exposure. Here, we demonstrate an all-in-plane alternative by "nanosculpting" ~100 nm-wide channels into thin films of FeTe0.75Se0.25/Bi2Te3 (FTS/BT), a candidate topological superconductor, with a Si++ focusses ion beam (FIB). Systematic irradiation shows that increasing the ion dose, while keeping the beam energy constant, progressively suppresses both the critical temperature (Tc) and critical current (Ic), confirming the creation of a controllable weak link even though a Fraunhofer interference pattern is not observed. Kelvin prove force microscopy , atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy corroborate the structural and electronic modification of the irradiated region. Ic (B) measurements reveal a slower field-induced decay of Ic at higher doses, indicating that irradiation-induced defects act as vortex-pinning centers that mitigate vortex motion and associated dissipation, By tuning beam energy and dose, the process shifts from SC-N-SC regime toward a superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SC-I-SC) geometry, offering a simple scalable pathway to JJ fabrication. These results established FIB pattering as a versatile platform for engineering robust, scalable fault-tolerant qubits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10606 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. We irradiated the sample following the same geometry shown in Figure 1a, starting from 0 pC/µm and incrementally increasing the dose, while simultaneously recording the current in situ (micromanipulator probes are shown as an inset of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Resistance vs. Temperature Behavior of the Junction. (a) Resistance vs. temperature plots for different doses of focused Si++ ion beam irradiation. The data show that superconductivity is weakened at sufficiently high doses. (b) The superconducting transition temperature (Tc) extracted from the curves in (a), is plotted as a function of ion dose. The decreasing trend of Tc with increasing dose is expected, as the en… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Current-Voltage Characteristics of a Pristine Device. (a) Current-voltage characteristics of the pristine device without any irradiation, measured at different perpendicular magnetic fields at the base temperature, T = 2.2 K. (b) Temperature dependence of the I-V characteristics for the same pristine device in the absence of an external magnetic field. In both cases—variation with magnetic field and temperature—the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Current-Voltage Characteristics for Different Doses. (a) I-V characteristics for devices irradiated with different doses of Si++ ion beam. A gradual evolution in the I-V behavior is observed as the dose increases from 0 to 200 pC/µm. (b) The extracted critical current …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references

  1. [36]

    Imaging atomic -scale effects of high -energy ion irradiation on superconductivity and vortex pinning in Fe (Se, Te)

    Massee F, Sprau PO, Wang YL, et al. Imaging atomic -scale effects of high -energy ion irradiation on superconductivity and vortex pinning in Fe (Se, Te). Science Advances 2015; 1(4): e1500033

    2015

  2. [1]

    Iron-based layered superconductor La [O1- x F x] FeAs (x= 0.05- 0.12) with T c= 26 K

    Kamihara Y , Watanabe T, Hirano M, Hosono H. Iron-based layered superconductor La [O1- x F x] FeAs (x= 0.05- 0.12) with T c= 26 K. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2008; 130(11): 3296–3297

    2008

  3. [2]

    Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for superconductivity

    Fernandes RM, Coldea AI, Ding H, Fisher IR, Hirschfeld P, Kotliar G. Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for superconductivity. Nature 2022; 601(7891): 35–44

    2022

  4. [3]

    A recent review on iron-based superconductor

    Biswal G, Mohanta K. A recent review on iron-based superconductor. Materials Today: Proceedings 2021; 35: 207–215

    2021

  5. [4]

    Iron- based superconductors: Current status of materials and pairing mechanism

    Hosono H, Kuroki K. Iron- based superconductors: Current status of materials and pairing mechanism. Physica C: Super- conductivity and its Applications 2015; 514: 399–422

    2015

  6. [5]

    Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO 3

    Ge JF, Liu ZL, Liu C, et al. Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO 3. Nature materials 2015; 14(3): 285–289

    2015

  7. [6]

    The electron-pairing mechanism of iron-based superconductors

    Wang F, Lee DH. The electron-pairing mechanism of iron-based superconductors. Science 2011; 332(6026): 200–204

    2011

  8. [7]

    Using gap symmetry and structure to reveal the pairing mechanism in Fe -based superconductors

    Hirschfeld PJ. Using gap symmetry and structure to reveal the pairing mechanism in Fe -based superconductors. Comptes Rendus Physique 2016; 17(1-2): 197–231

    2016

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    Interface-Induced High-Temperature Superconductivity in Single Unit- Cell FeSe Films on SrTiO 3

    Wang QY , Li Z, Zhang WH, et al. Interface-Induced High-Temperature Superconductivity in Single Unit- Cell FeSe Films on SrTiO 3. Chinese Physics Letters 2012; 29(3)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3

    Lee JJ, Schmitt FT, Moore RG, et al. Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3. Nature 2014; 515(7526): 245-248

    2014

  3. [10]

    Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based super- conductor

    Zhang P , Yaji K, Hashimoto T, et al. Observation of topological superconductivity on the surface of an iron-based super- conductor. Science 2018; 360(6385): 182–186

    2018

  4. [11]

    Topological orders competing for the Dirac surface state in FeSeTe surfaces

    Wu X, Chung SB, Liu C, Kim EA. Topological orders competing for the Dirac surface state in FeSeTe surfaces. Physical Review Research 2021; 3(1): 013066

    2021

  5. [12]

    Topological nature of the FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 superconductor

    Wang Z, Zhang P, Xu G, et al. Topological nature of the FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 superconductor. Physical Review B 2015; 92(11): 115119

    2015

  6. [13]

    Topological superconductivity on the surface of Fe -based superconductors

    Xu G, Lian B, Tang P, Qi XL, Zhang SC. Topological superconductivity on the surface of Fe -based superconductors. Physical review letters 2016; 117(4): 047001

    2016

  7. [14]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons

    Kitaev AY . Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics 2003; 303(1): 2-30

    2003

  8. [15]

    Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of Fe(1+y)Te(1 - x)Se(x)

    Li Y , Zaki N, Garlea VO, et al. Electronic properties of the bulk and surface states of Fe(1+y)Te(1 - x)Se(x). Nature Materials 2021; 20(9): 1221-1227

    2021

  9. [16]

    Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator

    Fu L, Kane CL. Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Physical Review Letters 2008; 100(9): 096407

    2008

  10. [17]

    Two- dimensional superconductivity at the interface of a Bi2Te3/FeTe heterostructure

    He QL, Liu H, He M, et al. Two- dimensional superconductivity at the interface of a Bi2Te3/FeTe heterostructure. Nature communications 2014; 5(1): 4247

    2014

  11. [18]

    Ubiquity of Rotational Symmetry Breaking in Superconducting Films, From Fe (Te , Se)/Bi2Te3 to Nb, and the Effect of Measurement Geometry

    Mallick D, Yi HT, Yuan X, Oh S. Ubiquity of Rotational Symmetry Breaking in Superconducting Films, From Fe (Te , Se)/Bi2Te3 to Nb, and the Effect of Measurement Geometry. Advanced Science 2025: 2504430

    2025

  12. [19]

    Superconductivity with twofold symmetry in Bi2Te3/FeTe0

    Chen M, Chen X, Yang H, Du Z, Wen HH. Superconductivity with twofold symmetry in Bi2Te3/FeTe0. 55Se0. 45 heterostructures. Science Advances 2018; 4(6): eaat1084

    2018

  13. [20]

    Evidence for topological superconductivity: Topological edge states in Bi2Te3/FeTe heterostructure

    Guo B, Shi KG, Qin HL, et al. Evidence for topological superconductivity: Topological edge states in Bi2Te3/FeTe heterostructure. Chinese Physics B 2020; 29(9): 097403

    2020

  14. [21]

    Hybrid symmetry epitaxy of the superconducting Fe (Te, Se) film on a topological insulator

    Yao X, Brahlek M, Yi HT, et al. Hybrid symmetry epitaxy of the superconducting Fe (Te, Se) film on a topological insulator. Nano letters 2021; 21(15): 6518–6524

    2021

  15. [22]

    Monolayer Superconductivity and Tunable Topological Electronic Structure at the Fe(Te,Se)/Bi(2) Te(3) Interface

    Moore RG, Lu Q, Jeon H, et al. Monolayer Superconductivity and Tunable Topological Electronic Structure at the Fe(Te,Se)/Bi(2) Te(3) Interface. Advanced Materials 2023; 35(22): e2210940

    2023

  16. [23]

    Interfacially Enhanced Superconductivity in Fe (Te, Se)/Bi4Te3 Heterostructures

    Chen AH, Lu Q, Hershkovitz E, et al. Interfacially Enhanced Superconductivity in Fe (Te, Se)/Bi4Te3 Heterostructures. Advanced Materials 2024; 36(31): 2401809

    2024

  17. [24]

    A scaling relation of vortex-induced rectification effects in a superconducting thin-film heterostructure

    Kobayashi Y , Shiogai J, Nojima T, Matsuno J. A scaling relation of vortex-induced rectification effects in a superconducting thin-film heterostructure. Communications Physics 2025; 8(1): 1–6

    2025

  18. [25]

    V ortices in high-temperature superconductors

    Blatter G, Feigel’man MV , Geshkenbein VB, Larkin AI, Vinokur VM. V ortices in high-temperature superconductors. Reviews of modern physics 1994; 66(4): 1125

    1994

  19. [26]

    V ortex pinning and creep in high- temperature superconductors with columnar defects

    Civale L. V ortex pinning and creep in high- temperature superconductors with columnar defects. Superconductor Science and Technology 1997; 10(7A): A11

    1997

  20. [27]

    Thermodynamic approach for enhancing superconducting critical current performance

    Miura M, Tsuchiya G, Harada T, et al. Thermodynamic approach for enhancing superconducting critical current performance. NPG Asia Materials 2022; 14(1): 85. 14

    2022

  21. [28]

    Impact of high growth rates on the microstructure and vortex pinning of high-temperature superconducting coated conductors

    Puig T, Gutierrez J, Obradors X. Impact of high growth rates on the microstructure and vortex pinning of high-temperature superconducting coated conductors. Nature Reviews Physics 2024; 6(2): 132–148

    2024

  22. [29]

    Quadrupling the depairing current density in the iron- based superconductor SmFeAsO1–x H x

    Miura M, Eley S, Iida K, et al. Quadrupling the depairing current density in the iron- based superconductor SmFeAsO1–x H x. Nature Materials 2024; 23(10): 1370–1378

    2024

  23. [30]

    Enhancement of critical current density and mechanism of vortex pinning in H+-irradiated FeSe single crystal

    Sun Y , Pyon S, Tamegai T, et al. Enhancement of critical current density and mechanism of vortex pinning in H+-irradiated FeSe single crystal. Applied Physics Express 2015; 8(11): 113102

    2015

  24. [31]

    Huge critical current density and tailored superconducting anisotropy in SmFeAsO0

    Fang L, Jia Y , Mishra V , et al. Huge critical current density and tailored superconducting anisotropy in SmFeAsO0. 8F0. 15 by low -density columnar-defect incorporation. Nature Communications 2013; 4(1): 2655

    2013

  25. [32]

    Enhancement of critical current density in Co- doped BaFe 2 As 2 with columnar defects introduced by heavy- ion irradiation

    Nakajima Y , Tsuchiya Y , Taen T, Tamegai T, Okayasu S, Sasase M. Enhancement of critical current density in Co- doped BaFe 2 As 2 with columnar defects introduced by heavy- ion irradiation. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics 2009; 80(1): 012510

    2009

  26. [33]

    High -field critical current enhancement by irradiation induced correlated and random defects in (Ba0

    Kihlstrom K, Fang L, Jia Y , et al. High -field critical current enhancement by irradiation induced correlated and random defects in (Ba0. 6K0. 4) Fe2As2. Applied Physics Letters 2013; 103(20)

    2013

  27. [34]

    Effects of particle irradiations on vortex states in iron -based superconductors

    Tamegai T, Taen T, Yagyuda H, et al. Effects of particle irradiations on vortex states in iron -based superconductors. Superconductor Science and Technology 2012; 25(8): 084008

    2012

  28. [35]

    Flux pinning by discontinuous columnar defects in 74 MeV Ag-irradiated YBa2Cu3O7 coated conductors

    Strickland N, Talantsev E, Long N, et al. Flux pinning by discontinuous columnar defects in 74 MeV Ag-irradiated YBa2Cu3O7 coated conductors. Physica C: Superconductivity 2009; 469(23- 24): 2060 – 2067

    2009

  29. [37]

    Ion irradiation of iron chalcogenide superconducting films

    Ozaki T, Wu L, Gu G, Li Q. Ion irradiation of iron chalcogenide superconducting films. Superconductor Science and Technology 2020; 33(9): 094008

    2020

  30. [38]

    Fabrication of Al/AlOx/Al junctions with high uniformity and stability on sapphire substrates

    Zheng Y , Li S, Ding Z, Xiong K, Feng J, Yang H. Fabrication of Al/AlOx/Al junctions with high uniformity and stability on sapphire substrates. Scientific Reports 2023; 13(1): 11874

    2023

  31. [39]

    Highly tunable NbTiN Josephson junctions fabricated with focused helium ion beam

    Ruhtinas A, Maasilta IJ. Highly tunable NbTiN Josephson junctions fabricated with focused helium ion beam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17348 2023

    2023

  32. [40]

    Nano Josephson superconducting tunnel junctions in YBa2Cu3O7–δ directly patterned with a focused helium ion beam

    Cybart SA, Cho E, Wong T, et al. Nano Josephson superconducting tunnel junctions in YBa2Cu3O7–δ directly patterned with a focused helium ion beam. Nature nanotechnology 2015; 10(7): 598–602

    2015

  33. [41]

    Josephson junctions and squids created by focused helium-ion- beam irradiation of y ba 2 cu 3 o 7

    Müller B, Karrer M, Limberger F, et al. Josephson junctions and squids created by focused helium-ion- beam irradiation of y ba 2 cu 3 o 7. Physical Review Applied 2019; 11(4): 044082

    2019

  34. [42]

    Transport properties of NbN thin films patterned with a focused helium ion beam

    Li H, Cai H, Forman J, et al. Transport properties of NbN thin films patterned with a focused helium ion beam. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 2023; 33(5): 1–4

    2023

  35. [43]

    Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar Josephson junctions

    Fornieri A, Whiticar AM, Setiawan F, et al. Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar Josephson junctions. Nature 2019; 569(7754): 89–92

    2019

  36. [44]

    Topological superconductivity in a planar Josephson junction

    Pientka F, Keselman A, Berg E, Yacoby A, Stern A, Halperin BI. Topological superconductivity in a planar Josephson junction. Physical Review X 2017; 7(2): 021032

    2017

  37. [45]

    On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure

    Stoller RE, Toloczko MB, Was GS, Certain AG, Dwaraknath S, Garner FA. On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section B: beam interactions with materials and atoms 2013; 310: 75–80

    2013

  38. [46]

    Focused helium -ion beam irradiation effects on electrical transport properties of few -layer WSe2: enabling nanoscale direct write homo -junctions

    Stanford MG, Pudasaini PR, Belianinov A, et al. Focused helium -ion beam irradiation effects on electrical transport properties of few -layer WSe2: enabling nanoscale direct write homo -junctions. Scientific reports 2016; 6(1): 27276

    2016

  39. [47]

    Influence of carbon- ion irradiation on the superconducting critical properties of MgB2 thin films

    Jung SG, Son SK, Pham D, et al. Influence of carbon- ion irradiation on the superconducting critical properties of MgB2 thin films. Superconductor Science and Technology 2019; 32(2): 025006

    2019

  40. [48]

    High flux pinning efficiency by columnar defects dispersed in three directions in YBCO thin films

    Sueyoshi T, Nishimura T, Fujiyoshi T, Mitsugi F, Ikegami T, Ishikawa N. High flux pinning efficiency by columnar defects dispersed in three directions in YBCO thin films. Superconductor Science and Technology 2016; 29(10): 105006. 15

    2016

  41. [49]

    Hard superconductivity: theory of the motion of Abrikosov flux lines

    Anderson PW, Kim Y . Hard superconductivity: theory of the motion of Abrikosov flux lines. Reviews of modern physics 1964; 36(1): 39

    1964

  42. [50]

    Scaling laws for flux pinning in hard superconductors

    Kramer EJ. Scaling laws for flux pinning in hard superconductors. Journal of applied physics 1973; 44(3): 1360–1370

    1973

  43. [51]

    Unique defect structure and advantageous vortex pinning properties in superconducting CaKFe4As4

    Ishida S, Iyo A, Ogino H, et al. Unique defect structure and advantageous vortex pinning properties in superconducting CaKFe4As4. npj Quantum Materials 2019; 4(1): 27

    2019

  44. [52]

    Robust and clean Majorana zero mode in the vortex core of high- temperature superconductor (Li 0.84 Fe 0.16) OHFeSe

    Liu Q, Chen C, Zhang T, et al. Robust and clean Majorana zero mode in the vortex core of high- temperature superconductor (Li 0.84 Fe 0.16) OHFeSe. Physical Review X 2018; 8(4): 041056

    2018

  45. [53]

    Scalable Majorana vortex modes in iron-based superconductors

    Chiu CK, Machida T, Huang Y , Hanaguri T, Zhang FC. Scalable Majorana vortex modes in iron-based superconductors. Science Advances 2020; 6(9): eaay0443

    2020

  46. [54]

    Observation of magnetic adatom -induced Majorana vortex and its hybridization with field - induced Majorana vortex in an iron- based superconductor

    Fan P, Yang F, Qian G, et al. Observation of magnetic adatom -induced Majorana vortex and its hybridization with field - induced Majorana vortex in an iron- based superconductor. Nature Communications 2021; 12(1): 1348

    2021

  47. [55]

    T., Wu, L., Zhang, C. et al. A route for a strong increase of critical current in nanostrained iron- based superconductors. Nature Communications 2016; 7, 13036. Nanosculpting lateral weak link junctions in superconducting Fe(Te,Se)/Bi2Te3 with focused Si++ ions and implicatio...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.