Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 59 references

The Rosette Nebula, mapped with 33,326 optical spectra plus carbon monoxide and dust maps, shows that the nebula formed from a non-homogeneous, thin-sheet molecular cloud at the edge of a filament.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 17:41 UTC pith:2CS3O634

load-bearing objection A careful, honest survey paper that delivers the first LVM IFS maps of the Rosette Nebula; its thin-sheet conclusion is plausible but remains a projection-dependent inference that kinematics has yet to test. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.10665 v1 pith:2CS3O634 submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.GA

SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper (LVM): Revealing the Structure of the Rosette Nebula

M\'onica A. Villa-Durango , Jorge Barrera-Ballesteros , Carlos G. Rom\'an-Z\'u\~niga , Emma R. Moran , Jason E. Ybarra , J. Eduardo M\'endez-Delgado , Niv Drory , Kathryn Kreckel
show 14 more authors
Hector Ibarra-Medel S. F. S\'anchez Evelyn J. Johnston A. Roman-Lopes Jes\'us Hernandez Jos\'e G. Fern\'andez-Trincado Amelia M. Stutz William J. Henney A. Ghosh Sumit K. Sarbadhicary A. Z. Lugo-Aranda Dmitry Bizyaev Amy M. Jones Guillermo A. Blan
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Rosette NebulaH II regionintegral field spectroscopymolecular cloud structureionization structurestellar feedbackinterstellar mediumline ratio diagnostics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses a large optical integral-field dataset—33,326 spectra covering a radius of about a degree around the Rosette Nebula—to map the ionized gas in Hα, Hβ, [O III], [N II], and [S II] at sub-parsec resolution, and overlays it with molecular (12CO) and dust (12 µm and far-infrared column density) maps. The resulting images show an evacuated central cavity, an annular ionization ring, and a series of interfaces where ionized gas meets neutral material: filaments, globules, elephant trunks, and dense regions with and without embedded young stars. Radial and quadrant-averaged profiles reveal that ionization is roughly uniform within about 10 pc, then drops sharply, while CO and dust rise in the southeast and stay low in the northeast. The authors interpret these patterns to conclude that the Rosette Nebula formed from a non-homogeneous molecular cloud located at the edge of a filament, with a thin-sheet structure, consistent with magnetically aligned sheet models proposed earlier. If this conclusion holds, it links the morphology of a classic H II region to the geometry of its parent cloud and provides a benchmark for understanding stellar feedback in filamentary molecular clouds.

Core claim

The paper maps the ionized gas of the Rosette Nebula at sub-parsec resolution using 33,326 optical spectra spanning 390–980 nm, and compares it to 12CO, 12 µm dust, and far-infrared column density maps. The spatial distribution of Hα, [O III], [N II], and [S II] reveals a central evacuated cavity surrounded by an ionization ring, with a marked asymmetry: the southeast is dense in CO and dust and weakly ionized, while the northeast is rarefied, with ionized gas escaping. At the boundaries between ionized and molecular gas, the authors identify filaments, globules, elephant trunks, and dense regions with and without embedded young stellar objects. Radial and quadrant-averaged flux profiles sho

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the multi-wavelength morphological overlay: emission-line flux maps and line-ratio maps (Hα/Hβ, [O III]/Hβ, [N II]/Hα, [S II]/Hα) from the new optical integral-field data are compared pixel-by-pixel with 12CO, 12 µm thermal dust, and far-infrared column density maps, using radial and quadrant profiles. This reveals coincidences and anticorrelations between ionized gas and neutral material, tracing ionization stratification, extinction asymmetry, and interfaces that the authors interpret as compression, photoevaporation, and shielding. The 30° inclined ring geometry proposed earlier explains the north-south extinction asymmetry in Hα/Hβ.

Load-bearing premise

The argument leans on treating spatial alignments and separations between Hα, CO, and dust as physical interactions (compression, shielding, photoevaporation) rather than line-of-sight projections of unrelated clouds at slightly different distances.

What would settle it

Measure the line-of-sight velocity fields of 12CO and Hα at the identified interface structures—the 'wrench' globule, the NGC 2237 region, the southeast cloud edge, and the arc near NGC 2244-334. If the molecular and ionized velocities show no systematic offset or compression signature across these boundaries, the apparent interactions are projection artifacts and the thin-sheet conclusion loses its support; if a coherent compression pattern appears, the conclusion is confirmed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the thin-sheet/filamentary progenitor interpretation is correct, the Rosette Nebula becomes a concrete local example where the geometry of the parent molecular cloud—not just stellar winds—sets the shape of an H II region.
  • The dense interfaces identified (globules, the 'wrench', the 'seahorse', the NGC 2237 region) are places where compression by the expanding ionized gas may be triggering or modifying star formation; these regions are the natural targets for next-step kinematic and young-stellar-object studies.
  • The quadrant asymmetry predicts that ionizing radiation escapes preferentially through the low-density northeast window, which should produce an observable blowout in surrounding large-scale interstellar-medium surveys.
  • The authors state that a forthcoming kinematic analysis will test the compression interpretation; if it matches, it will reconcile the stellar-wind bubble age with the cluster age, resolving the earlier discrepancy.
  • The demonstration that low-surface-brightness Hα (down to 1% of peak) traces the ionized-molecular interface with sub-parsec fidelity shows that similarly obtained integral-field datasets can map ionization fronts in other Galactic H II regions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same radial/quadrant overlay method could be applied to other H II regions observed with optical integral-field units to build a comparative taxonomy of interface morphologies; the Rosette would serve as the template for the 'thin-sheet' class.
  • The projection ambiguity could be tested statistically by generating synthetic maps from simulated thin-sheet and spherical-cloud models convolved to the same resolution; if the observed anticorrelations require a sheet, the conclusion is strengthened; if not, the alternative remains open.
  • Quantitative electron temperatures and densities are deferred due to preliminary calibration; once the absolute flux calibration is finalized, the line-ratio radial profiles could be converted into direct temperature and density gradients, checking whether the claimed ionization stratification holds.
  • High-precision astrometry combined with the gas velocities would let one distinguish triggered formation of embedded clusters from co-eval formation; for example, the reported distance offset of NGC 2237 suggests co-eval formation, which is a testable prediction against future kinematic maps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents the first LVM integral-field spectroscopy of the Rosette Nebula, using 33,326 spectra from 19 tiles. It maps Hα, Hβ, [OIII], [NII], and [SII] emission and line-ratio maps, and compares these with 12CO (MWISP), 12µm dust emission (WISE), and Herschel-derived column density. Because the LVM absolute calibration is preliminary (Section 2.1), the analysis is explicitly based on relative fluxes and is qualitative. The authors identify a ring-like ionized structure with a central cavity, filaments, globules, and interaction zones, and examine radial and quadrant profiles of Hα, CO, and dust. They use [NII]/Hα versus [SII]/Hα diagrams with an assumed N+/N = 0.4 to discuss ionization structure. The main interpretive conclusion is that the Rosette Nebula formed from a non-homogeneous molecular cloud located at the edge of a filament and exhibiting a thin-sheet structure, consistent with the Wareing et al. (2018) models. A kinematic study is deferred to a forthcoming paper.

Significance. The paper is a useful early-science demonstration of LVM's ability to map an entire Galactic H II region at sub-parsec scales, and it provides a multi-wavelength morphological catalogue of the Rosette Nebula. The data will become public with SDSS DR20, and the comparison with CO, dust, and column-density maps is valuable. However, the primary interpretive claim—the thin-sheet/filament progenitor geometry—is not tested by the data as presented. All maps are projected, line-of-sight-integrated tracers, and line-of-sight depth is not constrained. The authors are transparent about the preliminary calibration and qualitative nature of the analysis, but the abstract and conclusions go beyond what the projected morphology alone can support. The paper is best viewed as a descriptive morphological foundation, with the structural scenario requiring confirmation by the planned kinematic analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 and Section 3.5, Fig. 8] The conclusion that the Rosette Nebula "formed from a non-homogeneous molecular cloud... exhibiting a thin-sheet structure" rests on projected morphology. The quadrant radial profiles of CO, 12µm, and Hα are line-of-sight integrated; they cannot distinguish a thin sheet from an elongated distribution along the line of sight. The paper itself invokes projection as an alternative in specific cases: Section 4.2 says the arc near NGC 2244-334 "could represent a misinterpretation of the molecular cloud structure due to projection effects," and Section 3.5 allows CO inside the cavity to be "expanding perpendicularly to the plane of the nebula, located either in front of or behind it." Moreover, Section 4.1 cites Mužić et al. (2022) placing NGC 2237 ~85 pc behind NGC 2244, larger than the ~27 pc projected radius. Since kinematics are explicitly deferred, the thin-sheet/filament scenario is not
  2. [Sections 3.4-3.5, Figs. 7-8] The radial and quadrant profiles are shown without uncertainties. The line maps use S/N > 1 for [OIII], [NII], [SII], and Hβ (S/N ≥ 10 for Hα only, Section 2.1), so much of the outer-profile signal is low-S/N. Statements such as the first quadrant being "least dense" or the fourth quadrant having "elevated CO" are not accompanied by significance estimates. Because the paper deliberately avoids quantitative claims elsewhere, the reader cannot assess whether the asymmetries used to argue for a non-homogeneous progenitor are real or due to calibration noise and low-S/N selection. At minimum, bootstrap or noise-realization uncertainties should be added, or the text should explicitly label these differences as visual impressions rather than measured trends.
  3. [Section 3.6, Figs. 9-10] The diagnostic diagrams adopt N+/N = 0.4 as a fixed input, with the paper noting that the fraction "may vary throughout the RN." The subsequent quadrant and radial interpretation (e.g., trends toward higher S+/S, changes in ionization degree) is contingent on this hand-set value and on the Madsen et al. (2006) relation. Because N+/N is not derived from the data, the inferred spatial variation of S+/S is not an independent measurement. This is acceptable for a qualitative first pass, but the text should state explicitly that the spatial trends are model-dependent and do not by themselves establish an ionization gradient.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.5] Typo: "rgeovalues" should read "rgeo values".
  2. [Section 2.2] 12CO J=1-0 at 115 GHz is millimeter, not sub-millimeter; consider correcting the terminology.
  3. [Section 3.1] The Hα/Hβ ratio is used as an extinction tracer, but the preliminary relative calibration and lack of a reddening correction may affect the absolute ratio across the wavelength range. This caveat should be stated where the ratio map is interpreted.
  4. [Section 3.2] The text says the progenitor cloud extends "in the southeast–northeast direction," whereas later sections describe a southeast–northwest filament. Please check and unify the direction.
  5. [Section 3.4] The central flux used for normalization is described only by coordinate ranges; please specify how it is computed (mean, median) and, if possible, its uncertainty.
  6. [Section 3.6] Grammar: "In Figure 9, shows" should be "Figure 9 shows." Also, the Madsen et al. equation used for the S+/S lines is not written out; including it would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: observational morphology study with external model comparison; central claims are interpretations of projected maps, not reductions of fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is an observational, morphology-focused study. It does not derive quantitative predictions from first principles, nor does it fit parameters to data and then rename them as predictions. The main conclusion—that the Rosette Nebula formed from a non-homogeneous molecular cloud at the edge of a filament with a thin-sheet structure—is a qualitative interpretation of projected morphological maps (Hα, CO, 12µm, Herschel column density), and it is explicitly compared to the external Wareing et al. (2018) hydrodynamical models. That is an external model test, not a circular validation. The only hand-set physical parameter, N+/N = 0.4, is adopted from prior H II region literature (Madsen et al. 2006; Kreckel et al. 2024) and is explicitly treated as an approximation for qualitative diagnostic diagrams; it is not fitted to the Rosette data. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction. The cited LVM pipeline and data products (Sánchez et al. 2025; Kreckel et al. 2024; Moran et al. 2024) provide calibration and maps, but the structural conclusions do not depend on a self-citation chain or an imported uniqueness theorem. The projection degeneracy (line-of-sight depth) is a potential validity limitation, acknowledged locally for the arc near NGC 2244-334 (Section 4.2) and for CO inside the cavity (Section 3.5), but it is a correctness risk, not a circularity failure. The paper makes no derived claim that is tautologically equivalent to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on qualitative morphological comparison across several datasets. The only hand-set numeric input in the analysis is the N+/N ratio for diagnostic diagrams; the rest are standard observational assumptions about calibration reliability, distance, geometry, and interpretation of spatial coincidence.

free parameters (1)
  • N+/N fraction in diagnostic diagrams = 0.4
    Chosen in Section 3.6 as 'more representative of the interior of the Rosette Nebula' for the [NII]/Hα vs [SII]/Hα diagrams; the paper notes this fraction may vary, so it is a hand-selected nuisance parameter rather than a measured quantity.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The preliminary LVM absolute flux calibration is reliable for relative flux and line-ratio morphology
    Section 2.1 states the DRP absolute calibration is preliminary and being refined; all maps and ratios assume relative fluxes are trustworthy.
  • domain assumption Heliocentric distance of 1.5 kpc to the Rosette Nebula
    Adopted in Section 2.1 from Mužić et al. (2022); the paper states a 0.1 kpc change would not affect conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper N+/N = 0.4 is representative of the interior of the Rosette Nebula and the Madsen et al. (2006) equation applies
    Section 3.6: chosen by hand for this analysis; the paper acknowledges it may vary through the nebula.
  • domain assumption Projected circular symmetry of the nebula justifies concentric-ring radial profiles
    Section 3.4: 'taking advantage of the apparently circular symmetry projected onto the plane of the sky' following Bruhweiler et al. (2010).
  • domain assumption Spatial correspondence between different wavelength maps indicates physical association
    Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.5 interpret Hα/CO/dust coincidence or anticorrelation as interaction; projection effects mentioned only once (Section 4.2).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 24711 in / 12360 out tokens · 125801 ms · 2026-08-04T17:41:51.545443+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Rosette Nebula is a well-known H II region shaped by the interaction of gas with the OB stars of the NGC 2244 stellar association. Located within the remnant of a giant molecular cloud, it exhibits a complex structure of ionized gas, molecular material, dust, and embedded clusters. In October 2023, the region was observed as part of the SDSS-V Local Volume Mapper (LVM) integral field spectroscopy survey. Covering a radius of approximately 1 degree, the dataset comprises 33,326 spectra with spatially resolved information spanning 390 - 980 nm. We present a structural analysis of the ionized, molecular, and dusty components using multi-wavelength observations: optical spectroscopy from SDSS-V LVM, 12CO emission from PMO/MWISP (sub-millimeter), and dust emission from WISE (12 micron) and Herschel (far-infrared). These datasets were complemented with the positions of ionizing stars to study emission structures traced by H alpha, H beta, [O III], [N II], and [S II], as well as the spatial distribution of line ratios (H alpha/H beta, [O III]/H beta, [N II]/H alpha, and [S II]/H alpha) relative to the surrounding molecular cloud. Our analysis reveals interaction zones between ionized and neutral gas, including filaments, globules, and dense regions with or without ongoing star formation. Radial and quadrant-based flux profiles further highlight morphological and ionization variations, supporting the scenario in which the Rosette Nebula evolved from a non-homogeneous molecular cloud with a thin, sheet-like structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10665 by A. Ghosh, Amelia M. Stutz, Amy M. Jones, A. Roman-Lopes, A. Z. Lugo-Aranda, Carlos G. Rom\'an-Z\'u\~niga, Dmitry Bizyaev, Emma R. Moran, Evelyn J. Johnston, Guillermo A. Blan, Hector Ibarra-Medel, Jason E. Ybarra, J. Eduardo M\'endez-Delgado, Jes\'us Hernandez, Jorge Barrera-Ballesteros, Jos\'e G. Fern\'andez-Trincado, Kathryn Kreckel, M\'onica A. Villa-Durango, Niv Drory, S. F. S\'anchez, Sumit K. Sarbadhicary, William J. Henney.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Recreated image of the Rosette Nebula using LVM data and WISE dust maps. The image reveals many ionized gas structures and the surrounding dust distribution. The emission-line maps of [Oiii] (blue), Hα (green), and [Sii] (red) are displayed, while the 12 µm dust emission is shown in grayscale (units of MJy sr−1 ). O- and B-type stars are marked in yellow and cyan, respectively. dust temperature at each pos… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Maps of the line ratios Hα/Hβ, [Nii]/Hα, [Oiii]/Hβ, and [Sii]/Hα in the Rosette Nebula. O-type stars are marked with yellow stars. Color bars indicate the relation in relative flux intensity. The scale bar in the Hα/Hβ panel represents 12 pc, assuming a distance of 1.5 kpc to the nebula. In these maps, only spaxels with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) ≥ 1 in the emission lines and S/N ≥ 10 in Hα were conside… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Emission maps of the molecular cloud in 12CO (right) and dust in the 12 µm band (left) in the Rosette Nebula region. In both images, the contours corresponding to 20% (cyan) and 70% (green) of the maximum relative Hα flux. The Hα contours highlight regions of ionized gas surrounding areas of molecular and dust emission, providing information on the interaction between the ionized gas and the gas and dust c… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of relative Hαflux, 12 µm dust, and CO in selected regions of the Rosette Nebula. The top left panel shows the selected areas in the Hα map, with six regions of interest marked with yellow rectangles. Each numbered region (1–6) is enlarged in the bottom and side panels, where Hα maps (left), 12 µm dust emission (center), and CO emission (right) are shown. This selection of areas allows for a m… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Column density map derived from infrared data obtained with the Herschel Space Telescope, limited to the area overlapping the Rosette Nebula. Hα contours at 20% (cyan) and 70% (green) of the maximum relative flux highlight the ionized gas distribution. These contours indicate the distribution of ionized gas in relation to areas of high column density, allowing for analysis of the interaction between the io… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the Hα/Hβ ratio, Hα flux, molecular gas, and column density. The left panel displays the Hα/Hβ ratio map. The second panel shows the relative Hα flux. The third panel presents the 12CO emission map. The right panel shows the column density map in logarithmic scale (log NH). The green ”X” indicates the position of the embedded cluster [PL97] 2. This comparison reveals that regions with enhance… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Radial variation of normalized emission line fluxes from the ge￾ometric center of the Rosette Nebula. (a) Normalized flux profiles of [Sii], [Nii], [Oiii], Hα, and Hβ, showing an enhancement within the central 4.5 pc and a decline beyond 10 pc. (b) Normalized radial profiles of emission line ratios: [Sii]/Hα, [Nii]/Hα, and [Oiii]/Hβ, where the ratios with [Sii] and [Nii] highlight medium-ionization zones, … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radial distribution of emissions in the Rosette Nebula for different quadrants. The panels show the radial flux profiles for the emissions of 12CO (top), 12 µm dust (middle), and relative Hα flux (bottom). Colors represent the different quadrants: I (blue), II (orange), III (green), and IV (red), corre￾sponding to the northeast, northwest, southwest, and southeast regions of the nebula, respectively. The r… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ratio diagrams, [Sii]/Hα vs. [Nii]/Hα, for the four quadrants of the Rosette Nebula. The color scheme represents the distance from the center of the cavity in parsecs (pc). The blue dashed lines show theoretical values for different S+ /S ratios. The contours highlight the regions with the highest data density for Orion (blue) and the RN (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Ratio diagrams for different radial distance ranges from the center of the cavity in the nebula. The color code represents the intensity of the relative Hα emission. The lines and contours are the same as those shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Maps of the Rosette Nebula region around NGC 2237, showing the dust distribution at 12 µm (left), Hα emission (center), and 12CO emission (right). The cyan points mark the positions of the 168 stellar members of the NGC 2237 association identified by Wang et al. (2010), located in a region with complex structures of ionized gas, molecular gas, and dust. the star as B3. Using the same gas parameters and Nγ… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Map showing the position of the eclipsing binary star LS VI +05 12 (spectral type B2.5V) in Hα(left) and column density (right), with its ionization radius (Rs=0.29 pc) marked. This star is located in a region to the east of the nebula, characterized by low ionization and column density, with a break in the molecular cloud [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Map showing the positions of the stars Cl NGC 2244 CDZ 36 (B5) and HD 258691 (O9.5V) overlaid on Hα (left) and dust emission (right) maps. Solid red circles indicate their respective ionization radii (Rs=0.12 pc and Rs=1.80 pc). The B5 star, located 2.36 pc southeast of HD 258691, is enclosed by a dashed red circle with a radius of 0.45 pc, corresponding to a region of low Hα emission and enhanced dust co… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    D., Szeifert T., Wade G

    Bagnulo S., Hensberge H., Landstreet J. D., Szeifert T., Wade G. A., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034283 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...416.1149B 416, 1149

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034283 2004

  2. [2]

    K., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.3643B 503, 3643

    Barrera-Ballesteros J. K., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.3643B 503, 3643

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab755 2021

  3. [3]

    C., Freire Ferrero R., Bourdin M

    Bruhweiler F. C., Freire Ferrero R., Bourdin M. O., Gull T. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1872 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...719.1872B 719, 1872

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/719/2/1872 2010

  4. [4]

    V., Schneider N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..29C 557, A29

    Cambr \'e sy L., Marton G., Feher O., T \'o th L. V., Schneider N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...557A..29C 557, A29

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321235 2013

  5. [5]

    E., 1985, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&A...144..171C 144, 171

    Celnik W. E., 1985, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&A...144..171C 144, 171

    1985

  6. [6]

    Dent W. R. F., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14678.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.395.1805D 395, 1805

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Drory N., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..198D 168, 198

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9 2024

  8. [8]

    F., Carlqvist P., Johansson L

    Gahm G. F., Carlqvist P., Johansson L. E. B., Nikoli \'c S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...454..201G 454, 201

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054494 2006

  9. [9]

    F., Grenman T., Fredriksson S., Kristen H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133.1795G 133, 1795

    Gahm G. F., Grenman T., Fredriksson S., Kristen H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/512036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133.1795G 133, 1795

    work page doi:10.1086/512036 2007

  10. [10]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...1G 649, A1

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 2021

  11. [11]

    J., et al., 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L...3G 518, L3

    Griffin M. J., et al., 2010, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L...3G 518, L3

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014519 2010

  12. [12]

    Hennemann M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014629 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..84H 518, L84

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014629 2010

  13. [13]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad794810.1134/S1063772908070044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..267H 168, 267

    Herbst T. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad794810.1134/S1063772908070044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....168..267H 168, 267

    arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    F., Kere s D., O \ n orbe J., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., Bullock J

    Hopkins P. F., Kere s D., O \ n orbe J., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., Bullock J. S., 2014, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stu1738 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..581H 445, 581

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1738 2014

  15. [15]

    Hu Y., Lazarian A., Stanimirovi \'c S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abedb7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912....2H 912, 2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abedb7 2021

  16. [16]

    J., Nicholls D

    Kewley L. J., Nicholls D. C., Sutherland R. S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ARA&A..57..511K 57, 511

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 2019

  17. [17]

    C., 2018, @doi [APJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...68K 859, 68

    Kim J.-G., Kim W.-T., Ostriker E. C., 2018, @doi [APJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...68K 859, 68

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe27 2018

  18. [18]

    A., et al., 2025, Sloan Digital Sky Survey-V: Pioneering Panoptic Spectroscopy ( @eprint arXiv 2507.06989 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06989

    Kollmeier J. A., et al., 2025, Sloan Digital Sky Survey-V: Pioneering Panoptic Spectroscopy ( @eprint arXiv 2507.06989 ), https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06989

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    P., et al., 2024, in Bryant J

    Konidaris N. P., et al., 2024, in Bryant J. J., Motohara K., Vernet J. R. D., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 13096, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X. p. 130961Z, @doi 10.1117/12.3019892

    doi:10.1117/12.3019892 2024

  20. [20]

    Kreckel K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.352K 689, A352

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449943 2024

  21. [21]

    R., et al., 2014, in Beuther H., Klessen R

    Krumholz M. R., et al., 2014, in Beuther H., Klessen R. S., Dullemond C. P., Henning T., eds, Protostars and Planets VI. pp 243--266 ( @eprint arXiv 1401.2473 ), @doi 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Li C., Wang H., Zhang M., Ma Y., Fang M., Yang J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aad963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..238...10L 238, 10

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aad963 2018

  23. [23]

    Lim B., et al., 2021, @doi [AJ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abffd8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162...56L 162, 56

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abffd8 2021

  24. [24]

    J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..45L 566, A45

    Lombardi M., Bouy H., Alves J., Lada C. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201323293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..45L 566, A45

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323293 2014

  25. [25]

    J., Reynolds R

    Madsen G. J., Reynolds R. J., Haffner L. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/508441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...652..401M 652, 401

    doi:10.1086/508441 2006

  26. [26]

    Mahy L., Naz \'e Y., Rauw G., Gosset E., De Becker M., Sana H., Eenens P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911662 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...502..937M 502, 937

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911662 2009

  27. [27]

    M., Haikala L

    M \"a kel \"a M. M., Haikala L. K., Gahm G. F., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423440 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...567A.108M 567, A108

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423440 2014

  28. [28]

    M., Haikala L

    M \"a kel \"a M. M., Haikala L. K., Gahm G. F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...605A..82M 605, A82

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525655 2017

  29. [29]

    J., Rauw G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117458 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A..39M 538, A39

    Martins F., Mahy L., Hillier D. J., Rauw G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117458 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A..39M 538, A39

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117458 2012

  30. [30]

    F., Dale J

    McLeod A. F., Dale J. E., Ginsburg A., Ercolano B., Gritschneder M., Ramsay S., Testi L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv680 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.1057M 450, 1057

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv680 2015

  31. [31]

    F., Dale J

    McLeod A. F., Dale J. E., Evans C. J., Ginsburg A., Kruijssen J. M. D., Pellegrini E. W., Ramsay S. K., Testi L., 2019, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty2696 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486.5263M 486, 5263

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2696 2019

  32. [32]

    M., Finkbeiner D

    Meisner A. M., Finkbeiner D. P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781....5M 781, 5

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/5 2014

  33. [33]

    Mejia A., in prep, LVM Data Reduction Pipeline

  34. [34]

    J., Henney W

    Mellema G., Arthur S. J., Henney W. J., Iliev I. T., Shapiro P. R., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505294 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...647..397M 647, 397

    work page doi:10.1086/505294 2006

  35. [35]

    E., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C., 2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts

    Moran E., Ybarra J. E., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C., 2024, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 402.19

    2024

  36. [36]

    Motte F., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..77M 518, L77

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014690 2010

  37. [37]

    C., Cieza L

    Mu z i \'c K., Scholz A., Pe \ n a Ram \' rez K., Jayawardhana R., Sch \"o del R., Geers V. C., Cieza L. A., Bayo A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2da4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881...79M 881, 79

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2da4 2019

  38. [38]

    Mu z i \'c K., Almendros-Abad V., Bouy H., Kubiak K., Pe \ n a Ram \' rez K., Krone-Martins A., Moitinho A., Concei c \ a o M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..19M 668, A19

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243659 2022

  39. [39]

    J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Proceedings of SPIE Vol

    Perruchot S., et al., 2018, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. SPIE, p. 107027K, @doi 10.1117/12.2311996 , https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2311996

    doi:10.1117/12.2311996 2018

  40. [40]

    L., Lada E

    Phelps R. L., Lada E. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477..176P 477, 176

    work page doi:10.1086/303713 1997

  41. [41]

    Poglitsch A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014535 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L...2P 518, L2

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014535 2010

  42. [42]

    J., Robitaille T

    Poulton C. J., Robitaille T. P., Greaves J. S., Bonnell I. A., Williams J. P., Heyer M. H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12556.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384.1249P 384, 1249

    arXiv 2008

  43. [43]

    Pribulla T., et al., 2010, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201011351 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AN....331..397P 331, 397

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201011351 2010

  44. [44]

    Star Formation in the Rosette Complex

    Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C. G., Lada E. A., 2008, in Reipurth B., ed., , Vol. 4, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume I. p. 928, @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0810.0931

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0810.0931 2008

  45. [45]

    G., Elston R., Ferreira B., Lada E

    Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C. G., Elston R., Ferreira B., Lada E. A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/523785 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...672..861R 672, 861

    work page doi:10.1086/523785 2008

  46. [46]

    F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58...99S 58, 99

    S \'a nchez S. F., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58...99S 58, 99

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-012120-013326 2020

  47. [47]

    F., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad93bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...52S 169, 52

    S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad93bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169...52S 169, 52

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad93bb 2025

  48. [48]

    Scheuermann F., et al., 2023, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stad878 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.2369S 522, 2369

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad878 2023

  49. [49]

    Schneider N., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014627 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L..83S 518, L83

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014627 2010

  50. [50]

    Shang L.-H., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5831 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...63S 259, 63

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac5831 2022

  51. [51]

    M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L...4S 518, L4

    Swinyard B. M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518L...4S 518, L4

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014605 2010

  52. [52]

    K., Feigelson E

    Wang J., Townsley L. K., Feigelson E. D., Broos P. S., Getman K. V., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C. G., Lada E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/526406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675..464W 675, 464

    work page doi:10.1086/526406 2008

  53. [53]

    D., Townsley L

    Wang J., Feigelson E. D., Townsley L. K., Broos P. S., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C. G., Lada E., Garmire G., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716..474W 716, 474

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/1/474 2010

  54. [54]

    J., Pittard J

    Wareing C. J., Pittard J. M., Wright N. J., Falle S. A. E. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.3598W 475, 3598

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty148 2018

  55. [55]

    L., Bania T

    Wilson T. L., Bania T. M., Balser D. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...812...45W 812, 45

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/45 2015

  56. [56]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 2010

  57. [57]

    E., Lada E

    Ybarra J. E., Lada E. A., Rom \'a n-Z \'u \ n iga C. G., Balog Z., Wang J., Feigelson E. D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769..140Y 769, 140

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/2/140 2013

  58. [58]

    J., Bouy H., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526597 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...587A.106Z 587, A106

    Zari E., Lombardi M., Alves J., Lada C. J., Bouy H., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526597 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...587A.106Z 587, A106

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526597 2016

  59. [59]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...