Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 59 references

New constraint on Europa's ice shell: magnetic signature from the ocean

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a magnetically-driven equatorial jet in Europa's subsurface ocean, powered by Jupiter's time-varying magnetic field, modifies convective heat transport enough to produce ice-thickness variations of 5–10 km over 25° of

desk verdict Solid DNS study coupling Europa's magnetically-driven jet to rotating convection, with a testable ice-thickness prediction—but the headline amplitude rests on a single-Ekman scaling extrapolated over many orders of magnitude. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10903 v1 pith:XU4FUTKN submitted 2025-09-13 astro-ph.EP

Florentin Daniel , Ludovic Petitdemange , Christophe Gissinger This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords Europasubsurfaceoceaniceshellthicknessmagneticinductionzonaljetrotatingconvectionmagnetohydrodynamicstangentcylinder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the zonal jet induced in Europa's salty ocean by Jupiter's rotating magnetic field is not a side effect but a major actor in the moon's heat budget. Using direct numerical simulations of rotating MHD convection, it argues that the jet delays the onset of convection, reduces the efficiency of overall heat transport, and reshapes the latitudinal heat-flux profile at the ice-ocean interface. From these fluxes the paper derives ice-thickness maps showing a 5–10 km deepening of the ice around the equator over only 25° of latitude, two to three times larger than purely hydrodynamic estimates. Because this magnetic signature leaves a topographic bulge at the tangent cylinder, the paper argues that upcoming spacecraft measurements of Europa's shape can indirectly probe the ocean's depth and dynamical regime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electromagnetic pump: Jupiter's tilted dipole rotates relative to Europa, inducing electric currents in the salty ocean and a Lorentz force that drives a retrograde equatorial zonal jet. The analysis ties the jet's amplitude to the parameter Λ (Elsasser number) and uses the tangent cylinder—the imaginary cylinder tangent to the inner core at radius r_i, at latitudes θ_TC = arcsin χ—as the geometric locus where the jet's shear most strongly suppresses the radial heat flux. The jet's effect on convection is quantified by the modified onset scaling Ra_MHD^c ∝ Λ^{3/2}, and the heat-flux maps are converted to ice thickness using a conductive-ice equilibrium model (Nimmo

What would settle it

If JUICE or Europa Clipper measures the latitudinal ice-thickness profile and finds no bulge of several kilometers near the tangent cylinder latitudes (~±64°) while the inferred R*_G is of order unity, the jet's claimed effect on ocean heat transport would be contradicted at the quoted magnitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetically-driven equatorial jet, generated by Jupiter's time-varying field acting on the electrically conducting ocean, changes the balance of rotating convection. The jet raises the Rayleigh number needed for convection to begin (following a Λ^{3/2} scaling rather than the classical magnetoconvection Λ), pushes Europa's ocean away from the non-rotating regime toward a more rotationally constrained state, and thereby lowers the efficiency of radial heat transport. At the ice-ocean interface, the jet creates pronounced peaks in heat flux at the tangent cylinder latitudes (θ_TC = arcsin χ), which produce a bulge in the ice shell with thickness variations of 5–1

Load-bearing premise

The numerically measured scaling of the convection threshold (Ra_c ∝ Λ^{3/2}) and heat-flux effects, obtained at Ekman numbers down to 10^-5, extrapolate to Europa's ocean where the Ekman number is about 10^-12, and the ice shell responds purely conductively to the resulting heat-flux pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the prediction is correct, Europa's ice should show a bulge at the tangent cylinder latitudes (~64°) with local thickness variations of 5–10 km, measurable by JUICE and Europa Clipper.
  • Detection of the bulge would constrain the ocean's aspect ratio χ to roughly 0.9–0.94, translating to an ocean depth of 90–150 km.
  • If no bulge appears, the parameter R*_G for Europa's ocean would be constrained to high values, ruling out the weakly nonlinear regime.
  • The magnetically-driven jet provides a mechanism for vertical heat transport in a stably stratified layer near the ice, independent of any convective instability, so the ocean can deliver heat to the ice even if the top layer is stabilizing.
  • The predicted topography may promote localized ice fracturing near the tangent cylinder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same electromagnetic-pump mechanism should operate in other icy moons with non-axisymmetric planetary fields, such as Ganymede and Callisto, and the magnitude of the effect would scale with the field asymmetry and ocean conductivity.
  • If the jet velocity at Europa is at the upper end of the estimated 1–100 cm/s range, the Λ^{3/2} shift in the convection threshold implies that the heat-transport reduction and the resulting ice-thickness variations could be substantially larger than the 5–10 km baseline.
  • A direct observational test could come from combining limb-profile topography with radar sounding of ice thickness: the two should agree on the location and amplitude of the tangent-cylinder bulge if the magnetic mechanism is right.
  • The paper's ice model neglects pressure melting and ice convection; if those processes operate, they would smooth the predicted bulge, so the absence of a bulge would not conclusively falsify the ocean dynamics—only the assumed ice response.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies, via direct numerical simulations of rotating MHD convection in a spherical shell, the effect of Jupiter's time-varying magnetic field on Europa's subsurface ocean. It shows that the magnetically-driven equatorial jet, imported from Gissinger & Petitdemange (2019), transports heat in stably stratified layers, delays the onset of convection with a measured scaling Ra_MHD^c ∝ Λ^{3/2}, and shifts the boundary between transitional and non-rotating regimes. The resulting heat-flux profiles are passed through a conductive ice-shell model to obtain ice-thickness and topography maps. The headline prediction is that the jet produces a 5–10 km ice-thickness anomaly over ~25° in latitude around the tangent cylinder, two to three times larger than prior non-magnetic estimates, and that this bulge could be detectable by JUICE/Europa Clipper.

Significance. If the extrapolation from DNS to Europa is valid, the paper identifies a genuinely new mechanism—electromagnetic pumping—that couples to convection and produces a falsifiable topographic signature. The numerical setup is standard (PaRoDy/ShtNS), boundary conditions and parameter choices are clearly documented, and the paper is honest about several neglected processes. The strength of the manuscript is that it goes beyond idealized non-magnetic ocean models and makes a specific observable prediction. However, the central quantitative claims depend on an empirical onset scaling measured at a single Ekman number, a jet-speed calibration with two orders of magnitude uncertainty, and a purely conductive ice model that the authors admit would smooth the predicted variations. These gaps make the 5–10 km thickness anomaly a plausible but not yet well-supported quantitative prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III.A, Figure 2] The central scaling Ra_MHD^c ∝ Λ^{3/2} is measured only at Ek = 10^-4, as explicitly stated in the caption of the main panel. No threshold measurements at Ek = 10^-5 or lower are presented, and no analytic argument is given for why the exponent should be independent of Ek. Since the DNS values are Ek_d ~ 10^-3 to 10^-2 while Europa's value is ~10^-12 (Table I), the extrapolation over nine orders of magnitude is unconstrained. This scaling is load-bearing: it is used to shift the regime diagram (Fig. 3), to infer a 1–2 order-of-magnitude convective-onset delay at Europa, and ultimately to produce the heat-flux profiles behind the 5–10 km ice-thickness claim.
  2. [Section III.A, jet-speed conversion; Fig. 2 inset] The paper converts Λ to a jet velocity using uφ/c = 0.2N from Gissinger & Petitdemange (2019), but immediately notes that the resulting Europa jet speed spans 1–100 cm/s—a factor of 100 uncertainty. The predicted threshold shift of one to two orders of magnitude is therefore not a robust number; it depends on which jet-speed branch is chosen (B0^{2/3} vs B0^2, as the paper itself states). The ice-thickness prediction in Section III.B uses only Λ = 10, corresponding to the lower jet-speed estimate. A sensitivity analysis over the full 1–100 cm/s range is needed to determine whether the 5–10 km bulge is a robust prediction or an artifact of the lower bound.
  3. [Section III.B / Appendix B] The ice-thickness model assumes a purely conductive, passive shell and neglects pressure-dependent melting and convection within the ice. The authors acknowledge in Section IV that ice convection 'would smooth thickness variations.' This matters because the headline result—a variation in depth of 5–10 km over 25° in latitude, claimed to be two to three times larger than previous estimates—is derived from this conductive mapping. The comparison with 'previous non-magnetic estimates' is apples-to-oranges unless those earlier estimates used the same rheology and neglected the same effects. The authors should explicitly frame the 5–10 km as an upper bound and test sensitivity to the ice viscosity η_B and to the neglected ice-convective transport.
  4. [Section III.B, Fig. 4 and Discussion] The paper states that the MHD-driven peaks at the tangent cylinder 'persist across much of this range' of R*_G values, citing a range from roughly 0.6 to 60. However, the simulations shown in Fig. 4 cover only R*_G = 0.2, 0.7, and 4. No simulation approaches R*_G = 60, and at high R*_G the hydrodynamic system is already in the non-rotating regime; the MHD delay may or may not be sufficient to preserve the peaks. This is a testable gap. Either additional simulations at higher RaQ (or an argument from the measured regime shift) are required to support the persistence claim made in the text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract/title] Typographical errors: 'hos this' should read 'how this', and the title contains 'fr om' instead of 'from'.
  2. [Figure 2 inset] The inset label 'NuΛ RaQ ∝−1/4' is hard to parse. It should be written as Nu * Λ * RaQ^{-1/4} or expressed in words (compensated Nusselt number) for clarity.
  3. [Table I] The table lists DNS values of Ek_d as 10^-3 to 10^-2, but the text repeatedly refers to Ek = 10^-4 and 10^-5. Since the relation Ek_d = Ek/(1-χ)^2 is given, the table should explicitly state both definitions to avoid confusion.
  4. [Appendix B] Minor typo: 'Ojaganka' should be 'Ojakangas' in the introductory sentence; 'Chandrashekar' in Section III.A should be 'Chandrasekhar'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is a forward DNS-to-heat-flux-to-ice-thickness calculation, and the self-cited jet relation is independently reproduced in the paper's own simulations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular by construction. The magnetically-driven jet from Gissinger & Petitdemange (2019) is the load-bearing physical input, but it is re-obtained in the present DNS and explicitly checked against that prior prediction (`The fact that all points superimpose illustrates once more the agreement...`). The onset scaling Ra_MHD^c ∝ Λ^{3/2} is an empirical fit to the authors' own simulations, and using it to estimate Europa's convective threshold is an extrapolation over many orders of magnitude in Ekman number; that is a validity and robustness concern, not a circularity. The heat-flux profiles and the resulting 5–10 km ice-thickness variations are computed by feeding DNS heat fluxes into a forward ice-shell model (Nimmo et al. 2007), so the prediction is not a renamed input. The choice of reference thickness href in Figure 7 is adjusted to match observations, but it is a constant offset that does not determine the latitudinal bulge that is the paper's actual prediction. The paper also openly acknowledges its main limitations (DNS cannot match Europa's RaQ and Ek; conductive ice model; neglected pressure melting and ice convection), and these limitations weaken the quantitative claim but do not make it circular. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely through self-citation. The self-citations are to independent, published, externally falsifiable results, and the paper provides its own numerical confirmation of the key jet relation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The free parameters are mostly physical inputs chosen from literature, plus one explicit fit to observations (h_ref). The axioms are the modeling assumptions needed to turn the DNS output into a Europa prediction. No new physical entity is introduced; the magnetic jet is carried over from prior work.

free parameters (4)
  • Reference ice thickness h_ref = 32.75, 21.5, 12.5, 3.5 km for Phi_i = 6, 15, 25, 46 mW/m^2
    Chosen to match observed topography in Figure 7, so the comparison is not a free prediction of absolute ice thickness.
  • Modified Elsasser number Lambda = 10 (main runs); 1 to 3000 swept
    Selected to represent the low estimate of Europa's jet; actual value is uncertain by one to three orders of magnitude, and predictions depend on it.
  • Ocean floor heat flux Phi_i = 15 mW/m^2 for main profile; 6, 25, 46 for variants
    Assumed values spanning the literature range; the claimed upper limit on heat flux is the value where the model diverges from observations, so it inherits this choice.
  • Ice viscosity eta_B = 10^15 Pa.s (main); 10^14 to 10^15 cited range
    Chosen to set the tidal dissipation timescale in the ice thickness model; the value is uncertain and affects the amplitude of the bulge.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Boussinesq approximation is valid for Europa's ocean.
    Used in setting up equations (Section II.a); justified by reference to Soderlund et al. 2014, but not re-derived.
  • domain assumption The ocean is bounded by no-slip spheres and the ice shell is an electrical insulator and isothermal boundary.
    Section II.a; mechanical coupling of the ice is neglected, potentially altering jet and torque dynamics.
  • domain assumption Jupiter's magnetic field is the curl-free tilted dipole expression of Appendix A.
    Used to drive electromagnetic pumping; assumes field geometry and neglects magnetospheric feedback.
  • ad hoc to paper The magnetically-driven jet and its scaling u_phi/c = 0.2N from Gissinger & Petitdemange (2019) remain valid.
    The jet is not re-derived; the paper uses this prior result to convert Lambda to jet speed and to interpret the onset modification (Section III.A).
  • domain assumption Nimmo/Ojakangas-Stevenson conductive ice model maps ocean heat flux to ice thickness.
    Section III.B and Appendix B; assumes purely conductive ice, equilibrium with tidal dissipation and insolation, and neglects ice convection, pressure-dependent melting, and lateral transport.
  • standard math Known convective regime scaling laws and R*_G parameter apply to Europa.
    Equations for Nu and Re in rotating convection, and the R*_G transition criterion, are taken from literature (Gastine et al. 2016; Kvorka & Cadek 2022).
  • ad hoc to paper Numerically measured onset scaling Ra_MHD^c proportional to Lambda^{3/2} and regime diagram shift extrapolate to realistic parameters.
    Section III.A, Figure 2; extrapolation across many orders of magnitude in Ek and RaQ is required for the Europa predictions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New constraint on Europa's ice shell: magnetic signature from the ocean." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XU4FUTKN

@misc{pith2026250910903,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New constraint on Europa's ice shell: magnetic signature from the ocean},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XU4FUTKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10903}
}
read the original abstract

Jupiter's icy moons are believed to host subsurface liquid oceans, and among them, Europa stands out as one of the most promising candidates for extraterrestrial life. Yet, the processes driving oceanic flows beneath its ice shell, as well as the factors controlling the thickness of this ice, remain incompletely understood. One especially distinctive feature of Europa is that its salty ocean is electrically conducting and thus influenced by Jupiter's time-varying magnetic field, which is believed to drive a large-scale zonal flow. Here, we examine hos this magnetically-induced jet affects both the heat flux and the dynamics of the convective flow within Europa's ocean. We first show that the magnetically-driven jet efficiently transports heat in stably stratified regions near the top of the ocean, and may alter the expected convective scaling laws in deeper layers. Second, by analysing the latitudinal distribution of heat flux and relating it to ice-thickness variations, we make predictions that can be compared with current observations. In anticipation of the upcoming JUICE and Europa Clipper missions, we discuss how improved measurement precision could help further constrain the ocean's properties and refine our model-based forecasts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10903 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Evolutions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Modification of rotating convection thresholds. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Regime diagram constructed with our set of simulations and in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Geometry of the flow and resulting ice thickness profile for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Azimuthally-averaged radius profiles of Europa obtained wit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Does europa have a subsurface ocean? evaluation of the geological evidence

    Robert T Pappalardo, Michael JS Belton, HH Breneman, MH C arr, Clark R Chapman, GC Collins, T Denk, S Fagents, Paul E Geissler, B Giese, et al. Does europa have a subsurface ocean? evaluation of the geological evidence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , 104(E10):24015–24055, 1999

    1999

  2. [2]

    Induced magnetic fields as evidence for subsurface oceans in Europa and Callisto

    KK Khurana, MG Kivelson, DJ Stevenson, G Schubert, CT Rus sell, RJ Walker, and C Polanskey. Induced magnetic fields as evidence for subsurface oceans in Europa and Callisto. Nature, 395(6704):777–780, 1998. 14

    1998

  3. [3]

    Ice-ocean exchange processes in the jovian a nd saturnian satellites

    Krista M Soderlund, Kl´ ara Kalousov´ a, Jacob J Buffo, Christopher R Glein, Jason C Goodman, Giuseppe Mitri, G Wesley Patterson, Frank Postberg, Marc Rovira-Navarro, Tina R¨ uckriemen, et al. Ice-ocean exchange processes in the jovian a nd saturnian satellites. Space Science Reviews , 216:1–57, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE): An ESA mission to o rbit Ganymede and to characterise the Jupiter system

    Olivier Grasset, MK Dougherty, A Coustenis, EJ Bunce, C E rd, D Titov, M Blanc, A Coates, P Drossart, LN Fletcher, et al. JUpiter ICy moons Explorer (JUICE): An ESA mission to o rbit Ganymede and to characterise the Jupiter system. Planetary and Space Science , 78:1–21, 2013

    2013

  5. [5]

    Europa Clipp er mission concept: Exploring Jupiter’s ocean moon

    Cynthia B Phillips and Robert T Pappalardo. Europa Clipp er mission concept: Exploring Jupiter’s ocean moon. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union , 95(20):165–167, 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    Thermal state of an ice shell on europa

    Gregory W Ojakangas and David J Stevenson. Thermal state of an ice shell on europa. Icarus, 81(2):220–241, 1989

    1989

  7. [7]

    The global shape of europa: Constraints on lateral shell thickness variations

    Francis Nimmo, Peter C Thomas, Robert T Pappalardo, and W illiam B Moore. The global shape of europa: Constraints on lateral shell thickness variations. Icarus, 191(1):183–192, 2007

    2007

  8. [8]

    Do tidally-generated inertial waves heat the subsurface ocea ns of europa and enceladus? Icarus, 321:126–140, 2019

    Marc Rovira-Navarro, Michel Rieutord, Theo Gerkema, Le o RM Maas, Wouter van Der Wal, and Bert Vermeersen. Do tidally-generated inertial waves heat the subsurface ocea ns of europa and enceladus? Icarus, 321:126–140, 2019

    2019

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Internal energy dissipation in encelad us’s subsurface ocean from tides and libration and the role of ine rtial waves

    Jeremy Rekier, Antony Trinh, Santiago Andres Triana, an d Veronique Dehant. Internal energy dissipation in encelad us’s subsurface ocean from tides and libration and the role of ine rtial waves. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , 124(8): 2198–2212, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    Tid ally heated convection: Constraints on europa’s ice shell t hickness

    Gabriel Tobie, Gael Choblet, and Christophe Sotin. Tid ally heated convection: Constraints on europa’s ice shell t hickness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , 108(E11), 2003

    2003

  3. [11]

    The likely thickness of europa’s icy sh ell

    Samuel M Howell. The likely thickness of europa’s icy sh ell. The Planetary Science Journal , 2(4):129, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    O cean-driven heating of europa’s icy shell at low latitudes

    KM Soderlund, BE Schmidt, J Wicht, and DD Blankenship. O cean-driven heating of europa’s icy shell at low latitudes. Nature Geoscience, 7(1):16–19, 2014

    2014

  5. [13]

    D. G. Lemasquerier, C. J. Bierson, and K. M. Soderlund. E uropa’s ocean translates interior tidal heating patterns t o the ice-ocean boundary. AGU Advances, 4(6):e2023A V000994, 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.102 9/2023A V000994. URL https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/a...

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Zonostrophic turbulence in the subsurface oceans of the Jo vian and Saturnian moons

    Simon Cabanes, Thomas Gastine, and Alexandre Fournier . Zonostrophic turbulence in the subsurface oceans of the Jo vian and Saturnian moons. Icarus, 415:116047, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    The temp erature of europa’s subsurface water ocean

    HJ Melosh, AG Ekholm, AP Showman, and RD Lorenz. The temp erature of europa’s subsurface water ocean. Icarus, 168 (2):498–502, 2004

    2004

  8. [16]

    Layering and double-diffusion style convection in europa’s ocean

    Steve Vance and JM Brown. Layering and double-diffusion style convection in europa’s ocean. Icarus, 177(2):506–514, 2005

    2005

  9. [17]

    Layering by double-diffusive convection i n the subsurface oceans of europa and enceladus

    Teresa Wong, Ulrich Hansen, Thomas Wieseh¨ ofer, and Wi lliam B McKinnon. Layering by double-diffusive convection i n the subsurface oceans of europa and enceladus. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , 127(12):e2022JE007316, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Rotating convection with a melti ng boundary: An application to the icy moons

    T Gastine and B Favier. Rotating convection with a melti ng boundary: An application to the icy moons. Icarus, 429: 116441, 2025

    2025

  11. [19]

    Strong ocean tidal flow and heating on moo ns of the outer planets

    Robert H Tyler. Strong ocean tidal flow and heating on moo ns of the outer planets. Nature, 456(7223):770–772, 2008

    2008

  12. [20]

    A magn etically driven equatorial jet in europa’s ocean

    Christophe Gissinger and Ludovic Petitdemange. A magn etically driven equatorial jet in europa’s ocean. Nature Astronomy, 3(5):401–407, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Turbul ent drag at the ice-ocean interface of europa in simulations of rotating convection: Implications for nonsynchronous r otation of the ice shell

    HCFC Hay, I Fenty, RT Pappalardo, and Y Nakayama. Turbul ent drag at the ice-ocean interface of europa in simulations of rotating convection: Implications for nonsynchronous r otation of the ice shell. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , 128(3):e2022JE007648, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    A numerical model of conv ective heat transfer in Titan’s subsurface ocean

    Jakub Kvorka and Ondrej Cadek. A numerical model of conv ective heat transfer in Titan’s subsurface ocean. Icarus, 376: 114853, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Tim e-varying interaction of europa with the jovian magnetosph ere: Constraints on the conductivity of europa’s subsurface oce an

    Nico Schilling, Fritz M Neubauer, and Joachim Saur. Tim e-varying interaction of europa with the jovian magnetosph ere: Constraints on the conductivity of europa’s subsurface oce an. Icarus, 192(1):41–55, 2007

    2007

  16. [24]

    Rheological properties of water ice—applications to satellites of the outer planets

    WB Durham and LA Stern. Rheological properties of water ice—applications to satellites of the outer planets. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences , 29(1):295–330, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    Dormy, P

    E. Dormy, P. Cardin, and D. Jault. Mhd flow in a slightly di fferentially rotating spherical shell, with conducting inn er core, in a dipolar magnetic field. Earth and Planetary Science Letters , 160, 4 1998

    1998

  18. [26]

    Aubert, J

    J. Aubert, J. Aurnou, and J. Wicht. The magnetic structu re of convection-driven numerical dynamos. Geophys. J. Int. , 172, 11 2007. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03693.x

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Schaeffer

    N. Schaeffer. Efficient spherical harmonic transforms ai med at pseudospectral numerical simulations. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 3 2013. ISSN 1525-2027. doi:doi:10.1002/ggge.20071. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08104

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Heat transfer in ra pidly rotating convection with heterogeneous thermal boun dary conditions

    Jon E Mound and Christopher J Davies. Heat transfer in ra pidly rotating convection with heterogeneous thermal boun dary conditions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 828:601–629, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Ocean dynamics of outer solar syste m satellites

    Krista M Soderlund. Ocean dynamics of outer solar syste m satellites. Geophysical Research Letters , 46(15):8700–8710, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability . 1961. URL https://ui.adsabs.harvard. edu/abs/1961hhs..book.....C

    1961

  23. [31]

    Convection from a large horizontal surf ace

    CHB Priestley. Convection from a large horizontal surf ace. Australian Journal of Physics , 7(1):176–201, 1954

    1954

  24. [32]

    The heat transport and spectrum of the rmal turbulence

    Willem VR Malkus. The heat transport and spectrum of the rmal turbulence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 225(1161):196–212, 1954

    1954

  25. [33]

    A systematic experiment al study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium

    Julien Aubert, Daniel Brito, Henri-Claude Nataf, Phil ippe Cardin, and Jean-Paul Masson. A systematic experiment al study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors , 128(1-4):51–74, 2001. 15

    2001

  26. [34]

    Transport effects associated with t urbulence with particular attention to the influence of heli city

    Henry Keith Moffatt. Transport effects associated with t urbulence with particular attention to the influence of heli city. Reports on Progress in Physics , 46(5):621, 1983

    1983

  27. [35]

    Hydromagnetic convection in a rapidly rota ting fluid layer

    IA Eltayeb. Hydromagnetic convection in a rapidly rota ting fluid layer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 326(1565):229–254, 1972

    1972

  28. [36]

    The stability of thermally stratifie d plane poiseuille flow

    KS Gage and WH Reid. The stability of thermally stratifie d plane poiseuille flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 33(1): 21–32, 1968

    1968

  29. [37]

    Influence of counter-rotating von karman flow on cylindrical rayleigh-benard convection

    Lyes Bordja, Laurette S Tuckerman, Laurent Martin Witk owski, Maria Cruz Navarro, Dwight Barkley, and Rachid Bessa ih. Influence of counter-rotating von karman flow on cylindrical rayleigh-benard convection. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , 81(...

    2010

  30. [38]

    On the motion of solids in a liquid possessing vorticity

    Joseph Proudman and Horace Lamb. On the motion of solids in a liquid possessing vorticity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathemat ical and Physical Character , 92(642):408–424, 1916. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1916.0026. URL https://royals...

    1916

  31. [39]

    Motion of solids in fluids when the flow is not irrotational

    Geoffrey Ingram Taylor and Horace Lamb. Motion of solids in fluids when the flow is not irrotational. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mat hematical and Physical Character , 93(648):99–113, 1917. doi:10.1098/rspa.1917.0007. URL https://...

    1917

  32. [40]

    Sca ling regimes in spherical shell rotating convection

    Thomas Gastine, Johannes Wicht, and Julien Aubert. Sca ling regimes in spherical shell rotating convection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 808:690–732, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Turbulent thermal convection in the presence of rotation and a magnetic field: a heuristic theory

    David J Stevenson. Turbulent thermal convection in the presence of rotation and a magnetic field: a heuristic theory . Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics , 12(1):139–169, 1979

    1979

  34. [42]

    Heat transport in low-Rossby-number Rayleigh- Benard convection

    Keith Julien, Edgar Knobloch, Antonio M Rubio, and Geoff rey M Vasil. Heat transport in low-Rossby-number Rayleigh- Benard convection. Physical Review Letters , 109(25):254503, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    Experimental observat ion of the geostrophic turbulence regime of rapidly rotating conv ection

    Vincent Bouillaut, Benjamin Miquel, Keith Julien, Seb astien Aumaitre, and Basile Gallet. Experimental observat ion of the geostrophic turbulence regime of rapidly rotating conv ection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 118 (44):e2105015118, 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    Nonlinear dynamics of boussinesq conve ction in a deep rotating spherical shell-i

    Peter A Gilman. Nonlinear dynamics of boussinesq conve ction in a deep rotating spherical shell-i. Geophysical & Astro- physical Fluid Dynamics , 8(1):93–135, 1977

    1977

  37. [45]

    T he effects of vigorous mixing in a convective model of zonal flow on the ice giants

    Jonathan Aurnou, Moritz Heimpel, and Johannes Wicht. T he effects of vigorous mixing in a convective model of zonal flow on the ice giants. Icarus, 190(1):110–126, 2007

    2007

  38. [46]

    Latitudinal regi onalization of rotating spherical shell convection

    Thomas Gastine and Jonathan M Aurnou. Latitudinal regi onalization of rotating spherical shell convection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 954:R1, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Effect of shear and magnetic field on the heat-transfer efficiency of convection i n rotating spherical shells

    Rakesh K Yadav, Thomas Gastine, Ulrich R Christensen, L ucia DV Duarte, and Ansgar Reiners. Effect of shear and magnetic field on the heat-transfer efficiency of convection i n rotating spherical shells. Geophysical Journal International , 204(2):1120–1133, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    Gravity darkeni ng in late-type stars-i

    Rapha¨ el Raynaud, Michel Rieutord, Ludovic Petitdema nge, Thomas Gastine, and Bertrand Putigny. Gravity darkeni ng in late-type stars-i. the coriolis effect. Astronomy & Astrophysics , 609:A124, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Convectively driven shear and decreased heat flux

    David Goluskin, Hans Johnston, Glenn R Flierl, and Edwa rd A Spiegel. Convectively driven shear and decreased heat flux. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 759:360–385, 2014

    2014

  42. [50]

    The modulation effect of ice thickness var iations on convection in icy ocean worlds

    Wanying Kang. The modulation effect of ice thickness var iations on convection in icy ocean worlds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 525(4):5251–5261, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Chaos on europa

    Richard Greenberg, Gregory V Hoppa, BR Tufts, Paul Geis sler, Jeannemarie Riley, and Steven Kadel. Chaos on europa. Icarus, 141(2):263–286, 1999

    1999

  44. [52]

    The control networks of the galilean satellites and im plications for global shape

    ME Davies, TR Colvin, J Oberst, W Zeitler, P Schuster, G N eukum, AS McEwen, CB Phillips, PC Thomas, J Veverka, et al. The control networks of the galilean satellites and im plications for global shape. Icarus, 135(1):372–376, 1998

    1998

  45. [53]

    Titan’s topography and shape at the end of the cassini mission

    P Corlies, AG Hayes, SPD Birch, R Lorenz, BW Stiles, R Kir k, V Poggiali, H Zebker, and L Iess. Titan’s topography and shape at the end of the cassini mission. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(23):11–754, 2017

    2017

  46. [54]

    Titan’s gravity field and interior structure af ter cassini

    Daniele Durante, DJ Hemingway, P Racioppa, L Iess, and D J Stevenson. Titan’s gravity field and interior structure af ter cassini. Icarus, 326:123–132, 2019

    2019

  47. [55]

    Topographic respo nse to ocean heat flux anomaly on the icy moons of jupiter and satur n

    Martin Kihoulou, Ondrej Cadek, Jakub Kvorka, Klara Kal ousova, Gael Choblet, and Gabriel Tobie. Topographic respo nse to ocean heat flux anomaly on the icy moons of jupiter and satur n. Icarus, 391:115337, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    The effects of non-linearities on tidal flows in the convective envelopes of rotating stars and planets in exoplanetary systems

    A Astoul and AJ Barker. The effects of non-linearities on tidal flows in the convective envelopes of rotating stars and planets in exoplanetary systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 516(2):2913–2935, 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    The physical oceanography of ice-covered moons

    Krista M Soderlund, Marc Rovira-Navarro, Michael Le Ba rs, Britney E Schmidt, and Theo Gerkema. The physical oceanography of ice-covered moons. Annual Review of Marine Science , 16(1):25–53, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Europa’s differentiated internal structure: Inferences from four galileo encounters

    JD Anderson, G Schubert, RA Jacobson, EL Lau, WB Moore, a nd WL Sjogren. Europa’s differentiated internal structure: Inferences from four galileo encounters. Science, 281(5385):2019–2022, 1998

    2019

  51. [59]

    Solar system dynamics

    Carl D Murray and Stanley F Dermott. Solar system dynamics . Cambridge university press, 1999

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.