pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.16121 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Electronic bounds in magnetic crystals

Daniel Passos , Ivo Souza This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnetic crystalsChern insulatorsorbital magnetizationelectric susceptibilityChern vectorelectronic boundstopological invariants
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Bound relations connect electron density, orbital magnetization, and electric susceptibility via the Chern invariant in magnetic crystals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a series of inequalities relating key electronic properties in magnetic crystals, including electron density, effective mass, orbital magnetization, localization length, Chern invariant, and electric susceptibility. These bounds hold primarily for groups of low-lying bands but extend to upper bands in some cases. New findings provide a lower bound on the electric susceptibility for Chern insulators and an upper bound on the sum-rule contribution to orbital magnetization. The work also extends previous two-dimensional bounds involving the Chern number to a three-dimensional Chern vector. Such relations offer fundamental constraints that could simplify predictions of material behavior in both metallic and insulating magnetic systems.

Core claim

The authors derive and prove a collection of bound relations between electronic properties of magnetic crystals. These include a lower bound on the electric susceptibility of Chern insulators and an upper bound on the sum-rule part of the orbital magnetization. Bounds involving the Chern invariant are generalized from the two-dimensional Chern number to the three-dimensional Chern vector. The relations apply to metals as well as insulators and are demonstrated using model systems, with analysis of how they approach saturation in a Chern insulator with tunable flat bands in terms of the optical absorption spectrum.

What carries the argument

Sum-rule derived bounds linking the listed electronic properties through the Chern invariant and its three-dimensional generalization.

If this is right

  • The bounds apply equally to metals and to insulators.
  • They can be tested and saturated in model systems with tunable flat bands.
  • The approach to saturation connects directly to features in the optical absorption spectrum.
  • Generalization to the three-dimensional Chern vector extends the relations to more complex magnetic crystals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bounds may allow rapid estimates of susceptibility or magnetization without computing full band structures.
  • In material design, the relations could help screen candidates for topological magnetic properties by checking a few quantities.
  • The flat-band saturation analysis implies that controlling optical transitions is a practical route to tight bounds.

Load-bearing premise

Electronic bands can be separated into meaningful groups of low-lying states where the relations follow from fundamental electronic structure principles.

What would settle it

A calculation or measurement in a known Chern insulator model where the electric susceptibility falls below the stated lower bound would disprove the new result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.16121 by Daniel Passos, Ivo Souza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Solid and dashed colored lines at the bottom: parametric dependence, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy bands of a tight-binding model on a square lattice with tunable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical absorption spectra for circularly-polarized light in the tunable flat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Solid black line: Norm of the Chern vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Upper bounds on the electronic localization length in the 2D Haldane model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Solid black line: minimum direct gap Eg of the layered Haldane model of Sec. 6.3.1 in the gapped and gapless phases with nonzero Chern vector K. Dashed black line: outermost bound on Eg in Eq. (108), set by the inverse magnitude of K. The Chern vector goes to zero on the right end of the plot (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: same quantities as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Solid line: Clamped-ion electric susceptibility of the 2D Haldane model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of bound relations between different electronic properties of magnetic crystals: electron density, effective mass, orbital magnetization, localization length, Chern invariant, and electric susceptibility. All relations are satisfied for a group of low-lying bands, while some remain valid for upper bands. New results include a lower bound on the electric susceptibility of Chern insulators, and an upper bound on the sum-rule part of the orbital magnetization. In addition, bounds involving the Chern invariant are generalized from two dimensions (Chern number) to three (Chern vector). Bound relations are established for metals as well as insulators, and are illustrated for model systems. The manner in which they approach saturation in a model Chern insulator with tunable flat bands is analyzed in terms of the optical absorption spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops bound relations among electronic properties of magnetic crystals, including electron density, effective mass, orbital magnetization, localization length, Chern invariant, and electric susceptibility. All relations are stated to hold for a selected group of low-lying bands (with some remaining valid for upper bands). New results claimed are a lower bound on the electric susceptibility of Chern insulators, an upper bound on the sum-rule part of orbital magnetization, and a generalization of Chern-invariant bounds from the 2D Chern number to the 3D Chern vector. The bounds are asserted to apply to both metals and insulators and are illustrated on model systems, with saturation behavior analyzed via the optical absorption spectrum in a tunable flat-band Chern insulator.

Significance. If the derivations are rigorous and the bounds survive the stated conditions, the results would supply useful theoretical constraints relating topological invariants to response functions in magnetic materials. Explicit credit is due for the parameter-free character of the claimed relations and for the extension of 2D Chern bounds to a 3D vector quantity, both of which are falsifiable and potentially testable in model calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introductory sections on band grouping] The central results (lower bound on electric susceptibility of Chern insulators, upper bound on sum-rule orbital magnetization, and 2D-to-3D Chern generalization) are stated to hold only for a selected group of low-lying bands. No explicit definition or gap-protected projector is supplied that isolates this subspace while commuting with position, velocity, and Berry-curvature operators up to controlled errors. In metals or near-degenerate spectra, interband mixing can contribute finite corrections to the sum rules and invariants; without an error bound on the projector or a demonstration that the inequalities remain valid under controlled hybridization, the claimed generality is not secured. (Abstract and introductory sections on band grouping.)
  2. [Sections discussing metallic cases] The manuscript asserts that the bounds are established for metals as well as insulators, yet the low-lying-band selection criterion appears to presuppose an energy window that cleanly separates the subspace. In metallic cases with finite density of states at the Fermi level, avoided crossings or partial filling can violate the implicit commutation assumptions used in the derivations. A concrete counter-example or error estimate for metallic systems would be required to support this extension.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section introducing the 3D generalization] Notation for the Chern vector in 3D should be introduced with an explicit definition and relation to the 2D Chern number before the generalization is stated.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the model-system illustrations should include the specific parameter values at which saturation is approached and the corresponding optical absorption spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the valuable comments on our manuscript. We respond to the major comments point by point below, and we will revise the manuscript to address the issues raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central results (lower bound on electric susceptibility of Chern insulators, upper bound on sum-rule orbital magnetization, and 2D-to-3D Chern generalization) are stated to hold only for a selected group of low-lying bands. No explicit definition or gap-protected projector is supplied that isolates this subspace while commuting with position, velocity, and Berry-curvature operators up to controlled errors. In metals or near-degenerate spectra, interband mixing can contribute finite corrections to the sum rules and invariants; without an error bound on the projector or a demonstration that the inequalities remain valid under controlled hybridization, the claimed generality is not secured.

    Authors: We concur that the definition of the low-lying bands subspace requires more explicit treatment to ensure the bounds are rigorously established. In the revised manuscript, we will add a detailed explanation of the projector onto the low-lying bands, defined as the sum over the selected bands assuming they are gapped from the higher ones. We will prove that this projector commutes with the Hamiltonian and provide controlled error estimates for its commutation with the position, velocity, and Berry curvature operators, with the errors scaling as the inverse of the band gap. This will demonstrate that the inequalities hold with quantifiable corrections under controlled hybridization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript asserts that the bounds are established for metals as well as insulators, yet the low-lying-band selection criterion appears to presuppose an energy window that cleanly separates the subspace. In metallic cases with finite density of states at the Fermi level, avoided crossings or partial filling can violate the implicit commutation assumptions used in the derivations. A concrete counter-example or error estimate for metallic systems would be required to support this extension.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the potential issues in metallic systems. Although our bounds are derived for any well-defined subspace, we agree that the metallic case needs further elaboration. In the revision, we will supply an error estimate for situations with finite DOS at the Fermi level, showing that the corrections to the sum rules are small when the energy window is appropriately chosen. We will also present a model example of a metallic Chern system to illustrate the validity of the bounds. We do not currently have a counter-example where the bounds are violated, but we will clarify the assumptions in the text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bounds derived from independent electronic-structure relations

full rationale

The paper derives inequalities relating electron density, effective mass, orbital magnetization, localization length, Chern invariant, and electric susceptibility for selected groups of low-lying bands in magnetic crystals. These relations are presented as following from sum rules and topological properties without any quoted step that reduces a claimed prediction or bound to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The abstract and described claims contain no self-definitional loops, renamed empirical patterns, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. The band-grouping assumption is an explicit scope limitation rather than a hidden tautology, and the new bounds (lower bound on susceptibility of Chern insulators, upper bound on sum-rule orbital magnetization, 2D-to-3D Chern generalization) are stated as derived results rather than inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms are extractable. The work appears to rest on standard domain assumptions of electronic structure theory for magnetic crystals.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bound relations hold for a group of low-lying bands in magnetic crystals
    Directly stated in abstract as the scope for which relations are satisfied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 1271 out tokens · 63707 ms · 2026-05-18T15:19:14.893998+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optical Hall absorption sum rule and spectral compensation in time-reversal-breaking moir\'e and Hofstadter systems

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A first-frequency-moment constraint on antisymmetric optical conductivity vanishes exactly in zero-field moiré continuum models and equals a magnetic-flux-determined constant in Hofstadter models, implying spectral co...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. P. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Commun. Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980), doi:10.1007/BF02193559

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02193559 1980

  2. [2]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984), doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0023

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1984.0023 1984

  3. [3]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1959 1959

  4. [4]

    Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometrical theory, Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 121 (2011), doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10874-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2010-10874-4 2011

  5. [5]

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators , Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/9781316662205 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1017/9781316662205 2018

  6. [6]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materials, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.00098 (2025), 2501.00098

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.00098 2025

  7. [7]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. W. Moll, T. Holder and R. Queiroz, Quantum geometry: Revisiting electronic scales in quantum matter, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.07173 (2025), 2504.07173

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.07173 2025

  8. [8]

    A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. N and S.-Y. Xu, Quantum geometry phenomena in condensed matter systems, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.00469 (2025), 2508.00469

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.00469 2025

  9. [9]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165139 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.165139

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.165139 2014

  10. [10]

    Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands,

    S. Peotta and P. T\"orm\"a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nat. Communs. 6, 8944 (2015), doi:10.1038/ncomms9944

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms9944 2015

  11. [11]

    Ozawa and B

    T. Ozawa and B. Mera, Relations between topology and the quantum metric for Chern insulators , Phys. Rev. B 104, 045103 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.045103 2021

  12. [12]

    Traini, Electric polarizability of the hydrogen atom: a sum rule approach, European J

    M. Traini, Electric polarizability of the hydrogen atom: a sum rule approach, European J. Phys. 17, 30 (1996), doi:10.1088/0143-0807/17/1/006

    work page doi:10.1088/0143-0807/17/1/006 1996

  13. [13]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Phys. Rev. B 62, 1666 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1666

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.1666 2000

  14. [14]

    Aebischer, D

    C. Aebischer, D. Baeriswyl and R. M. Noack, Dielectric Catastrophe at the Mott Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 468 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.468

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.468 2001

  15. [15]

    R. M. Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods , Cambridge, 1st edition edn. (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Fundamental bound on topological gap, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011052 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011052

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.011052 2024

  17. [17]

    Komissarov, T

    I. Komissarov, T. Holder and R. Queiroz, The quantum geometric origin of capacitance in insulators, Nature Commun. 15, 4621 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48808-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48808-x 2024

  18. [18]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Universal relation between energy gap and dielectric constant, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155107 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.155107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.155107 2024

  19. [19]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous response and quantum geometry of insulators, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.07052 (2025), 2403.07052

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07052 2025

  20. [20]

    Souza, R

    I. Souza, R. M. Martin and M. Stengel, Optical bounds on many-electron localization , SciPost Phys. 18, 127 (2025), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.4.127

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.4.127 2025

  21. [21]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamental property of quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023158 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.023158

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.7.023158 2025

  22. [22]

    Shinada and N

    K. Shinada and N. Nagaosa, Quantum geometrical bound relations for observables, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.12836 (2025), 2507.12836

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.12836 2025

  23. [23]

    Kune s and P

    J. Kune s and P. M. Oppeneer, Exact many-body sum rule for the magneto-optical spectrum of solids, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15774 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.61.15774

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.15774 2000

  24. [24]

    Souza and D

    I. Souza and D. Vanderbilt, Dichroic f -sum rule and the orbital magnetization of crystals, Phys. Rev. B 77, 054438 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.054438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.054438 2008

  25. [25]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Transport , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.236809

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.236809 2007

  26. [26]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the ``Parity Anomaly'' , Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2015 2015

  27. [27]

    Yang, Z.-C

    S. Yang, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun and S. Das Sarma, Topological flat band models with arbitrary Chern numbers , Phys. Rev. B 86, 241112 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.241112

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.241112 2012

  28. [28]

    G.-G. Liu, Z. Gao, Q. Wang, X. Xi, Y.-H. Hu, M. Wang, C. Liu, X. Lin, L. Deng, S. A. Yang, P. Zhou, Y. Yang et al., Topological Chern vectors in three-dimensional photonic crystals , Nature 609, 925 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05077-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05077-2 2022

  29. [29]

    Hong and C.-H

    S.-J. Hong and C.-H. Park, Higher-order sum rules for the optical conductivity, Unpublished

    work page

  30. [30]

    Fano and J

    U. Fano and J. W. Cooper, Spectral Distribution of Atomic Oscillator Strengths , Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 441 (1968), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.40.441

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.40.441 1968

  31. [31]

    H. A. Bethe and R. Jackiw, Intermediate Quantum Mechanics , The Benjamin Cummins Publishing Company, 3rd edn. (1986)

    work page 1986

  32. [32]

    M. V. Berry, The Quantum Phase, Five years After , In F. Wilczek and A. Shapere, eds., Geometric Phases in Physics . World Scientific, Singapore (1989)

    work page 1989

  33. [33]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands , Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12847

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.12847 1997

  34. [34]

    J. L. Martins, C. L. Reis and I. Souza, Precise quantum-geometric electronic properties from first principles, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.23652 (2025), 2506.23652

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.23652 2025

  35. [35]

    Geometrical meaning of the Drude weight and its relationship to orbital magnetization

    R. Resta, Geometrical meaning of the Drude weight and its relationship to orbital magnetization , doi:10.48550/arXiv.1703.00712 (2017), 1703.00712

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00712 2017

  36. [36]

    Resta, Drude weight and superconducting weight, J

    R. Resta, Drude weight and superconducting weight, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 30, 414001 (2018), doi:10.1088/1361-648X/aade19

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aade19 2018

  37. [37]

    J. E. Prussing, The principal minor test for semidefinite matrices, J. Guid. Control Dyn. 9(1), 121 (1986), doi:10.2514/3.20077

    work page doi:10.2514/3.20077 1986

  38. [38]

    Wikipedia contributors , Invariants of tensors --- Wikipedia , the free encyclopedia , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Invariants_of_tensors&oldid=1269822116, [Online; accessed 15-July-2025] (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    G. A. Holzapfel, Nonlinear Solid Mechanics , Wiley (2000)

    work page 2000

  40. [40]

    Mirsky, An Introduction to Linear Algebra , Oxford University Press (1955)

    L. Mirsky, An Introduction to Linear Algebra , Oxford University Press (1955)

    work page 1955

  41. [41]

    T. F. Moriarty, Two sets of inequalities among the principal invariants of the Cauchy-Green deformation tensors , Elasticity 1, 87 (1971), doi:10.1007/BF00045702

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00045702 1971

  42. [42]

    Marcus and W

    M. Marcus and W. R. Gordon, An extension of the Minkowski determinant theorem , Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 17, 321 (1971), doi:10.1017/S0013091500009597

    work page doi:10.1017/s0013091500009597 1971

  43. [43]

    Ghosh, Y

    B. Ghosh, Y. Onishi, X. S.-Y, H. Lin, L. Fu and A. Bansil, Probing quantum geometry through optical conductivity and magnetic circular dichroism, Sci. Adv. 10, eado1761 (2024), doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado1761

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ado1761 2024

  44. [44]

    Ba ut, B

    D. Ba ut, B. Bradlyn and P. Abbamonte, Quantum entanglement and quantum geometry measured with inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B 111, 125161 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.125161

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.125161 2025

  45. [45]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath and D. E. Parker, Vortexability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators , Phys. Rev. B 108, 205144 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.205144

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.205144 2023

  46. [46]

    Fujimoto, D

    M. Fujimoto, D. E. Parker, J. Dong, E. Khalaf, A. Vishwanath and P. Ledwith, Higher Vortexability: Zero-Field Realization of Higher Landau Levels , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106502 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.106502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.106502 2025

  47. [47]

    Z. Liu, B. Mera, M. Fujimoto, T. Ozawa and J. Wang, Theory of Generalized Landau Levels and Its Implications for Non-Abelian States , Phys. Rev. X 15, 031019 (2025), doi:10.1103/1zg9-qbd6

    work page doi:10.1103/1zg9-qbd6 2025

  48. [48]

    Graf and P

    M. Graf and P. Vogl, Electromagnetic fields and dielectric response in empirical tight-binding theory, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4940 (1995), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4940

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.4940 1995

  49. [49]

    R. R. Nair, P. Blake, A. N. Grigorenko, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth, T. Stauber, N. M. Peres and A. K. Geim, Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene, Science 320(5881), 1308 (2008), doi:10.1126/science.1156965

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1156965 2008

  50. [50]

    , " * write output.state after.block =

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 'af...

    work page

  51. [51]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

    work page