pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.16371 · v2 · pith:OEAKIMVWnew · submitted 2025-09-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Multimode Gaussian steady state engineering in optomechanical systems with a squeezed reservoir

Nahid Yazdi , Stefano Zippilli , David Vitali This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords optomechanicssqueezed reservoirdissipative stabilizationmechanical cluster statesGaussian quantum statessteady-state engineeringphonon interactions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single squeezed optical reservoir combined with optomechanical mediation can stabilize targeted Gaussian quantum states in multiple mechanical modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a protocol in which one optical mode is driven by a squeezed reservoir while other optical modes generate effective interactions between mechanical modes. These interactions and the engineered dissipation together drive the mechanical modes to a desired steady state. The resulting open-system dynamics match an ideal target model provided external noise stays low. This approach is examined specifically for creating mechanical cluster states arranged on rectangular graphs.

Core claim

The interplay between the coherent phonon-phonon interactions mediated by the auxiliary optical modes and the dissipation provided by the squeezed bath enables the steady-state preparation of targeted quantum states of the mechanical modes, closely approximating an ideal theoretical model when uncontrolled noise sources are negligible. The protocol performance is analyzed for the generation of mechanical cluster states defined on rectangular graphs.

What carries the argument

Effective phonon-phonon interaction Hamiltonian mediated by auxiliary optical modes, paired with dissipation from a single squeezed reservoir.

Load-bearing premise

Uncontrolled noise sources remain negligible so the open-system dynamics reproduce the ideal target model.

What would settle it

Measure the steady-state covariance matrix of the mechanical modes and check whether its entries match the exact values predicted for the target state under the protocol.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.16371 by David Vitali, Nahid Yazdi, Stefano Zippilli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Setup: A multimode optomechanical system where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fidelity (a)-(c) [Eq. (D1)] and variance of the nullifiers (d)-(e) [Eq. (D8)], as a function of the optical decay rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. As in Fig. 2 but for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. As in Fig. 2, but for non-resonant mechanical resonators. The values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. As in Fig. 2, but evaluated by selecting the specific values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. As in Fig. 3 but for a rectangular graph with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. As in Fig. 3 but for a rectangular graph with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Fidelity (a)-(c) and variance of the nullifiers (d)-(e), as a function of the mechanical decay rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a theoretical protocol for the dissipative stabilization of mechanical quantum states in a multimode optomechanical system composed of multiple optical and mechanical modes. The scheme employs a single squeezed reservoir that drives one of the optical modes, while the remaining optical modes mediate an effective phonon-phonon interaction Hamiltonian. The interplay between these coherent interactions and the dissipation provided by the squeezed bath enables the steady-state preparation of targeted quantum states of the mechanical modes. In the absence of significant uncontrolled noise sources, the resulting dynamics closely approximate the model introduced in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021)]. We analyze the performance of this protocol in generating mechanical cluster states defined on rectangular graphs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical protocol for dissipative engineering of multimode Gaussian steady states in an optomechanical system consisting of multiple optical and mechanical modes. A single squeezed reservoir drives one optical mode while the remaining optical modes mediate an effective phonon-phonon interaction Hamiltonian; the interplay of these coherent interactions and the engineered dissipation is claimed to stabilize the mechanical modes into targeted states, specifically mechanical cluster states on rectangular graphs, that closely approximate the ideal closed-system model of Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021) provided uncontrolled noise remains negligible.

Significance. If the approximation to the 2021 PRL model holds with quantifiable robustness, the scheme would constitute a practical simplification for preparing continuous-variable cluster states, requiring only a single squeezed bath rather than multiple independent reservoirs. This could reduce experimental overhead in optomechanical platforms for Gaussian quantum information processing, provided the noise-tolerance analysis is supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results / Performance analysis (cluster-state fidelity subsection)] The central claim that the steady-state dynamics 'closely approximate' the target model of Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021) is load-bearing for the cluster-state preparation result, yet no explicit bound is derived on the ratio of uncontrolled noise rates (thermal phonons, optical losses, imperfect squeezing) to the engineered squeezed-dissipation rate. Cluster-state fidelity on rectangular graphs degrades rapidly under additional Lindblad channels; without a quantitative fidelity-versus-noise plot or perturbative bound in the results section, the regime of validity remains unverified.
  2. [Model derivation / Effective Hamiltonian section] The derivation of the effective phonon-phonon interaction Hamiltonian mediated by the auxiliary optical modes is presented as parameter-free in the ideal limit, but the manuscript does not show how residual optical losses or finite cavity decay rates modify the effective Lindblad operators. A concrete check (e.g., comparison of the steady-state covariance matrix with and without these terms) is needed to confirm the approximation remains faithful.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Figure 1] Notation for the rectangular-graph cluster states should be clarified with an explicit adjacency-matrix definition or figure label to avoid ambiguity when comparing to the 2021 PRL reference.
  2. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract states the protocol works 'in the absence of significant uncontrolled noise sources'; this phrasing is repeated in the main text but should be replaced by a precise statement of the parameter regime (e.g., 'when thermal occupancy n_th < 0.1 and optical loss rate κ_loss / γ_squeezed < 0.05').

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments correctly identify areas where additional quantitative support would strengthen the presentation of our approximation to the ideal model. We address each point below and have incorporated revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results / Performance analysis (cluster-state fidelity subsection)] The central claim that the steady-state dynamics 'closely approximate' the target model of Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021) is load-bearing for the cluster-state preparation result, yet no explicit bound is derived on the ratio of uncontrolled noise rates (thermal phonons, optical losses, imperfect squeezing) to the engineered squeezed-dissipation rate. Cluster-state fidelity on rectangular graphs degrades rapidly under additional Lindblad channels; without a quantitative fidelity-versus-noise plot or perturbative bound in the results section, the regime of validity remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative characterization of the noise tolerance is necessary to substantiate the regime of validity. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in the results that derives a perturbative bound on the deviation of the steady-state covariance matrix from the ideal target when additional Lindblad terms are present at small but finite strength. We also include a figure plotting the rectangular-graph cluster-state fidelity versus the ratio of uncontrolled noise rates to the engineered squeezed-dissipation rate, confirming that fidelities above 0.9 are maintained for ratios below approximately 0.1 under the parameter regimes considered. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model derivation / Effective Hamiltonian section] The derivation of the effective phonon-phonon interaction Hamiltonian mediated by the auxiliary optical modes is presented as parameter-free in the ideal limit, but the manuscript does not show how residual optical losses or finite cavity decay rates modify the effective Lindblad operators. A concrete check (e.g., comparison of the steady-state covariance matrix with and without these terms) is needed to confirm the approximation remains faithful.

    Authors: We concur that the effects of residual optical losses and finite cavity decay should be quantified to validate the effective model. The revised manuscript now includes an extended derivation that retains these terms explicitly and presents a direct numerical comparison of the steady-state covariance matrices obtained with and without them. For cavity decay rates and optical losses kept below 5% of the relevant optomechanical coupling strengths, the element-wise deviation remains below 4%, supporting the fidelity of the approximation in the regime of interest. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation approximates independent external model

full rationale

The paper derives an effective optomechanical Hamiltonian and Lindblad dynamics from a squeezed reservoir coupled to one optical mode, with auxiliary modes mediating phonon-phonon interactions. The central claim is that these dynamics approximate the target model of Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020402 (2021) when uncontrolled noise is negligible. This reference is external (different authors) and provides an independent benchmark rather than a self-citation or fitted input. No equations reduce a prediction to a parameter fit by construction, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation chain remains self-contained, with the approximation serving as a performance claim rather than a definitional tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optics modeling assumptions for optomechanical Hamiltonians and the validity of the low-noise approximation to the 2021 model; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The multimode optomechanical system is accurately described by standard cavity-optomechanics Hamiltonians plus a squeezed reservoir acting on one optical mode.
    Invoked implicitly when the protocol is said to approximate the 2021 model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5643 in / 1252 out tokens · 41283 ms · 2026-05-18T15:11:19.331271+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fidelity The fidelity measures how close two states are. The fidelity between the steady state of our system and the target state, can be expressed in terms of the covariance matrices as [64] F= 2N q E(b) st +E (b) target ,(D1) where the target covariance matrixE (b) target is evaluated as fol- lows. The elements ofE (b) target are n E(b) target o k,k′ = ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    V is the variance of the nullifiers

    Variance of the nullifiers The other quantity that we study in Sec. V is the variance of the nullifiers. An ideal Gaussian cluster states with adjacency matrixA is defined as the eigenstate at zero eigenvalue of the nullifiers, that are the linear combination of quadrature operators [52, 53] Xk =−i bkeiθk −b † ke−iθ j − NX k′=1 Akk′ bk′ eiθk′ +b † k′ e−iθ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr ¨oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quantum technolo- gies, Nat. Phys.18, 15 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Chu and S

    Y . Chu and S. Gr ¨oblacher, A perspective on hybrid quantum opto- and electromechanical systems, Appl. Phys. Lett.117, 150503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity op- tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    W. H. P. Nielsen, Y . Tsaturyan, C. B. Møller, E. S. Polzik, and A. Schliesser, Multimode optomechanical system in the quan- tum regime, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 62 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    M. J. Weaver, F. Buters, F. Luna, H. Eerkens, K. Heeck, S. de Man, and D. Bouwmeester, Coherent optomechanical state transfer between disparate mechanical resonators, Nat Commun 16 8, 824 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Gil-Santos, M

    E. Gil-Santos, M. Labousse, C. Baker, A. Goetschy, W. Hease, C. Gomez, A. Lema ˆıtre, G. Leo, C. Ciuti, and I. Favero, Light-Mediated Cascaded Locking of Multiple Nano- Optomechanical Oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 063605 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Kralj, M

    N. Kralj, M. Rossi, S. Zippilli, R. Natali, A. Borrielli, G. Pan- draud, E. Serra, G. D. Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Enhancement of three-mode optomechanical interaction by feedback-controlled light, Quantum Sci. Technol.2, 034014 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Piergentili, L

    P. Piergentili, L. Catalini, M. Bawaj, S. Zippilli, N. Malossi, Riccardo Natali, D. Vitali, and G. D. Giuseppe, Two-membrane cavity optomechanics, New J. Phys.20, 083024 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Moaddel Haghighi, N

    I. Moaddel Haghighi, N. Malossi, R. Natali, G. Di Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Sensitivity-Bandwidth Limit in a Multimode Op- toelectromechanical Transducer, Phys. Rev. Applied9, 034031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    M. F. Colombano, G. Arregui, N. E. Capuj, A. Pitanti, J. Maire, A. Griol, B. Garrido, A. Martinez, C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, and D. Navarro-Urrios, Synchronization of Optomechanical Nanobeams by Mechanical Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 017402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    J. P. Mathew, J. del Pino, and E. Verhagen, Synthetic gauge fields for phonon transport in a nano-optomechanical system, Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 198 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Piergentili, W

    P. Piergentili, W. Li, R. Natali, N. Malossi, D. Vitali, and G. D. Giuseppe, Two-membrane cavity optomechanics: Non-linear dynamics, New J. Phys.23, 073013 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Fiaschi, B

    N. Fiaschi, B. Hensen, A. Wallucks, R. Benevides, J. Li, T. P. M. Alegre, and S. Gr ¨oblacher, Optomechanical quantum teleportation, Nat. Photon.15, 817 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Mercier de L ´epinay, C

    L. Mercier de L ´epinay, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨a¨a, Quantum mechanics–free subsystem with mechanical oscillators, Science372, 625 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Mercad ´e, K

    L. Mercad ´e, K. Pelka, R. Burgwal, A. Xuereb, A. Mart´ınez, and E. Verhagen, Floquet Phonon Lasing in Multimode Optome- chanical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 073601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    del Pino, J

    J. del Pino, J. J. Slim, and E. Verhagen, Non-Hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing, Na- ture606, 82 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    M. H. J. de Jong, J. Li, C. G ¨artner, R. A. Norte, and S. Gr¨oblacher, Coherent mechanical noise cancellation and co- operativity competition in optomechanical arrays, Optica9, 170 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Kharel, Y

    P. Kharel, Y . Chu, D. Mason, E. A. Kittlaus, N. T. Otterstrom, S. Gertler, and P. T. Rakich, Multimode Strong Coupling in Cavity Optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Applied18, 024054 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, A. Bancora, M. Chegnizadeh, J. Pan, T. V ovk, and T. J. Kippenberg, Topological lattices realized in superconducting circuit optomechanics, Nature612, 666 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    H. Ren, T. Shah, H. Pfeifer, C. Brendel, V . Peano, F. Marquardt, and O. Painter, Topological phonon transport in an optomechan- ical system, Nat Commun13, 3476 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Mercad ´e, R

    L. Mercad ´e, R. Ortiz, A. Grau, A. Griol, D. Navarro-Urrios, and A. Mart´ınez, Engineering Multiple GHz Mechanical Modes in Optomechanical Crystal Cavities, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 014043 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    C. C. Wanjura, J. J. Slim, J. del Pino, M. Brunelli, E. Verhagen, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quadrature nonreciprocity in bosonic net- works without breaking time-reversal symmetry, Nat. Phys.19, 1429 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Madiot, M

    G. Madiot, M. Albrechtsen, S. Stobbe, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, and G. Arregui, Multimode optomechanics with a two- dimensional optomechanical crystal, APL Photonics8, 116107 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Chegnizadeh, M

    M. Chegnizadeh, M. Scigliuzzo, A. Youssefi, S. Kono, E. Gu- zovskii, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum collective motion of macroscopic mechanical oscillators, Science386, 1383 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Vijayan, J

    J. Vijayan, J. Piotrowski, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, K. Weber, O. Romero-Isart, and L. Novotny, Cavity-mediated long-range interactions in levitated optomechanics, Nat. Phys.20, 859 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Alonso-Tom ´as, C

    D. Alonso-Tom ´as, C. M. Arab ´ı, C. Mili ´an, N. E. Capuj, A. Mart ´ınez, and D. Navarro-Urrios, Self-modulated multi- mode silicon cavity optomechanics (2025), arXiv:2501.16914

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    B. A. Moores, L. R. Sletten, J. J. Viennot, and K. W. Lehn- ert, Cavity Quantum Acoustic Device in the Multimode Strong Coupling Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 227701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Qiao, ´E

    H. Qiao, ´E. Dumur, G. Andersson, H. Yan, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, C. R. Conner, Y . J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, X. Wu, and A. N. Cleland, Splitting phonons: Building a plat- form for linear mechanical quantum computing, Science380, 1030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    von L ¨upke, I

    U. von L ¨upke, I. C. Rodrigues, Y . Yang, M. Fadel, and Y . Chu, Engineering multimode interactions in circuit quantum acous- todynamics, Nat. Phys.20, 564 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk ¨agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨a¨a, Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical os- cillators, Nature556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Riedinger, A

    R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi ´c, C. L ¨oschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, and S. Gr ¨oblacher, Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators, Nature 556, 473 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Kotler, G

    S. Kotler, G. A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Geller, S. Glancy, E. Knill, R. W. Sim- monds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Direct observation of deterministic macroscopic entanglement, Science372, 622 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Andersson, S

    G. Andersson, S. W. Jolin, M. Scigliuzzo, R. Borgani, M. O. Thol´en, J. Rivera Hern´andez, V . Shumeiko, D. B. Haviland, and P. Delsing, Squeezing and Multimode Entanglement of Surface Acoustic Wave Phonons, PRX Quantum3, 010312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    E. A. Wollack, A. Y . Cleland, R. G. Gruenke, Z. Wang, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechanical res- onators, Nature604, 463 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, Optomechanical Transducers for Long-Distance Quan- tum Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 220501 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    S. J. M. Habraken, K. Stannigel, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Continuous mode cooling and phonon routers for phononic quantum networks, New J. Phys.14, 115004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Asjad, S

    M. Asjad, S. Zippilli, P. Tombesi, and D. Vitali, Large distance continuous variable communication with concatenated swaps, Phys. Scr.90, 074055 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Ji, Y .-F

    J.-W. Ji, Y .-F. Wu, S. C. Wein, F. K. Asadi, R. Ghobadi, and C. Simon, Proposal for room-temperature quantum repeaters with nitrogen-vacancy centers and optomechanics, Quantum6, 669 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    M. S. Ebrahimi, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Feedback-enabled microwave quantum illumination, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 035003 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Y . Xia, A. R. Agrawal, C. M. Pluchar, A. J. Brady, Z. Liu, Q. Zhuang, D. J. Wilson, and Z. Zhang, Entanglement- enhanced optomechanical sensing, Nat. Photon.17, 470 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Komar, S. J. M. Habraken, S. D. Bennett, M. D. 17 Lukin, P. Zoller, and P. Rabl, Optomechanical Quantum Infor- mation Processing with Photons and Phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 013603 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [44]

    Schmidt, M

    M. Schmidt, M. Ludwig, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical circuits for nanomechanical continuous variable quantum state processing, New J. Phys.14, 125005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Ludwig and F

    M. Ludwig and F. Marquardt, Quantum Many-Body Dynam- ics in Optomechanical Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 073603 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    Schmidt, V

    M. Schmidt, V . Peano, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical Dirac physics, New J. Phys.17, 023025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Schmidt, S

    M. Schmidt, S. Kessler, V . Peano, O. Painter, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical creation of magnetic fields for photons on a lattice, Optica, OPTICA2, 635 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Houhou, D

    O. Houhou, D. W. Moore, S. Bose, and A. Ferraro, Uncon- ditional measurement-based quantum computation with op- tomechanical continuous variables, Phys. Rev. A105, 012610 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Pechal, P

    M. Pechal, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Su- perconducting circuit quantum computing with nanomechan- ical resonators as storage, Quantum Sci. Technol.4, 015006 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    C. T. Hann, C.-L. Zou, Y . Zhang, Y . Chu, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Hardware-Efficient Quantum Ran- dom Access Memory with Hybrid Quantum Acoustic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Camp- bell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brand˜ao, Building a Fault- Tolerant Quantum Computer Using Concatenated Cat Codes, PRX Quantum3, 010329 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Yazdi, S

    N. Yazdi, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Generation of stable Gaus- sian cluster states in optomechanical systems with multifre- quency drives, Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 035001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Zippilli and D

    S. Zippilli and D. Vitali, Dissipative Engineering of Gaus- sian Entangled States in Harmonic Lattices with a Single-Site Squeezed Reservoir, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 020402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Zhang and S

    J. Zhang and S. L. Braunstein, Continuous-variable Gaussian analog of cluster states, Phys. Rev. A73, 032318 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Zippilli and D

    S. Zippilli and D. Vitali, Possibility to generate any Gaussian cluster state by a multi-mode squeezing transformation, Phys. Rev. A102, 052424 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    J. B. Clark, F. Lecocq, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Sideband cooling beyond the quantum backaction limit with squeezed light, Nature541, 191 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    M. J. Yap, J. Cripe, G. L. Mansell, T. G. McRae, R. L. Ward, B. J. J. Slagmolen, P. Heu, D. Follman, G. D. Cole, T. Corbitt, and D. E. McClelland, Broadband reduction of quantum radia- tion pressure noise via squeezed light injection, Nat. Photonics 14, 19 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Asjad, S

    M. Asjad, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Mechanical Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen entanglement with a finite-bandwidth squeezed reservoir, Phys. Rev. A93, 062307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    W. P. Bowen and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optomechanics(Tay- lor & Francis, 2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Biancofiore, M

    C. Biancofiore, M. Karuza, M. Galassi, R. Natali, P. Tombesi, G. Di Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Quantum dynamics of a high- finesse optical cavity coupled with a thin semi-transparent membrane, Phys. Rev. A84, 033814 (2011)

    work page 2011

  61. [61]

    Karuza, M

    M. Karuza, M. Galassi, C. Biancofiore, C. Molinelli, R. Na- tali, P. Tombesi, G. D. Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Tunable linear and quadratic optomechanical coupling for a tilted membrane within an optical cavity: Theory and experiment, J. Opt.15, 025704 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    Eichenfield, J

    M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, Modeling dispersive coupling and losses of localized optical and mechanical modes in optomechanical crystals, Opt. Express, OE17, 20078 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    M. Wu, A. C. Hryciw, C. Healey, D. P. Lake, H. Jayakumar, M. R. Freeman, J. P. Davis, and P. E. Barclay, Dissipative and Dispersive Optomechanics in a Nanocavity Torque Sensor, Phys. Rev. X4, 021052 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Shevchuk, G

    O. Shevchuk, G. A. Steele, and Ya. M. Blanter, Strong and tun- able couplings in flux-mediated optomechanics, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014508 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    I. C. Rodrigues, D. Bothner, and G. A. Steele, Coupling mi- crowave photons to a mechanical resonator using quantum in- terference, Nat Commun10, 5359 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Spedalieri, C

    G. Spedalieri, C. Weedbrook, and S. Pirandola, A limit formula for the quantum fidelity, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.46, 025304 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    N. C. Menicucci, Fault-Tolerant Measurement-Based Quantum Computing with Continuous-Variable Cluster States, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120504 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    Fukui, A

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, A. Okamoto, and K. Fujii, High-Threshold Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Analog Quantum Error Correction, Phys. Rev. X8, 021054 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    B. W. Walshe, L. J. Mensen, B. Q. Baragiola, and N. C. Menicucci, Robust fault tolerance for continuous-variable clus- ter states with excess antisqueezing, Phys. Rev. A100, 010301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    G. S. MacCabe, H. Ren, J. Luo, J. D. Cohen, H. Zhou, A. Sipahigil, M. Mirhosseini, and O. Painter, Nano-acoustic resonator with ultralong phonon lifetime, Science370, 840 (2020)

    work page 2020