pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.16996 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Radiation Mediated Shock and Planar Shock Breakout in the Presence of Atomic Transition Lines

Jonathan Morag This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 15:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords radiation mediated shocksshock breakoutsupernovaeopacitylocal thermal equilibriumatomic transitionsradiative diffusionsupernova envelopes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Incorporating opacity from bound heavy elements keeps radiation in local thermal equilibrium at higher velocities than fully ionized models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines fast radiation-mediated shocks traveling through uniform media and escaping planar power-law density profiles, setups relevant to supernova shock breakout. Earlier calculations assumed a fully ionized plasma emitting only via Bremsstrahlung, so that at high velocities the photon spectrum departed from local thermal equilibrium and peaked at many keV. Adding frequency-dependent opacity from bound-free and bound-bound transitions of solar-composition heavy elements, taken from TOPS tables, increases photon production and allows the radiation to remain in LTE up to higher shock speeds. In the planar shock-breakout case this opacity lowers the emission temperature by a factor of two or even ten. The result implies that the spectral energy distribution of envelope breakout from red-supergiant explosions will stay thermal, making detectable X-ray signals far less probable than earlier forecasts suggested.

Core claim

Including bound-free and bound-bound opacity from heavy elements augments photon production in radiation-mediated shocks and enables the radiation field to maintain local thermal equilibrium at higher velocities than in the fully ionized Bremsstrahlung-only problem. In planar shock-breakout geometry the extra opacity reduces the emergent temperature by factors of two to ten. The work supplies a semi-analytic description of the spectral energy distribution when LTE holds and shows that accurate calculations require opacity tables containing bound yet highly ionized species, ruling out tables such as Kurucz.

What carries the argument

Hydrodynamically coupled multi-group radiative diffusion code that includes inelastic Compton scattering together with frequency-dependent bound-free and bound-bound opacity drawn from the TOPS tables.

If this is right

  • The spectral energy distribution of supernova envelope breakout remains in local thermal equilibrium for red-supergiant explosions without stellar wind and for part of blue-supergiant explosions.
  • X-ray detections of these breakouts become less probable by orders of magnitude relative to earlier predictions.
  • Shock-breakout calculations must employ opacity tables that include bound yet highly ionized species.
  • A semi-analytic description of the spectral energy distribution is available whenever local thermal equilibrium is maintained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar opacity treatments may be needed to reassess X-ray visibility for breakouts in other progenitor classes or in the presence of stellar winds.
  • Optical and ultraviolet searches could prove more effective than X-ray searches for detecting breakouts from red supergiants.
  • Future work could test how the LTE threshold changes when different ionization states or alternative line tables are substituted.
  • The same multi-group approach with realistic bound opacity could be applied to other radiation-mediated flows in high-energy astrophysics.

Load-bearing premise

The TOPS opacity tables correctly capture bound-free and bound-bound processes for solar-composition heavy elements at the temperatures and densities immediately behind the shock front.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic observation of a red-supergiant supernova shock breakout whose temperature or spectral shape deviates strongly from the LTE prediction obtained with the new opacity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.16996 by Jonathan Morag.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Temperature profile of a steady-state RMS as a function of optical depth, for a shock velocity β0 = 0.1 and initial density ρ0 = 10−9 g cm−3 . Photon temperature Tγ (equation 4 - in blue) and plasma temperature T (in red) are markedly lower in the presence of TOPS opacity (solid lines) relative to the ff-only case (dashed lines). TLTE (equation 3 in yellow) is nearly identical for both cases. ff-only simu￾… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Steady-state photon energy density distribution, uν for the same simulations as in figure 1, showing that adding TOPS opacity reduces Tγ and brings the distribu￾tion closer to LTE. In the presence of ff-only opacity (dashed lines) uν reaches very high temperatures, matching Compton equillibrium (teal dashed line) based on Tγ from figure 1. uν cross-sections are shown at (-2,0,2) shock crossings from the po… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example multigroup emission / absorption opac￾ities at T = (40, 400) eV, which correspond to TLTE at ve￾locity β0 = 0.07 and densities ρ = (10−7 , 10−11) g cm−3 (see figure 3). The effect of TOPS opacity on photon produc￾tion relative to free-free only opacity is pronounced at lower breakout temperatures, T = 40 eV, but has only a minor effect at T = 400 eV. The table from Morag (2023) is also shown at 40 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Snapshots of the temperature, 1 3 and 5 shock crossing times prior to shock breakout, for the choice ρbo = 10−9 g cm−3 and βbo = 0.1. Peak temperature at the shock is much lower with TOPS opacity (solid lines - color) relative to ff-only (dashed lines -color). The equivalent LTE tempea￾ture (yellow lines) are compared to the Sakurai-Weaver An￾zats (black dashed lines) showing excellent agreement. The legen… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Output spectrum from the same simulations as figure 5, shown near shock-breakout time. The spectrum at breakout in the case of free-free only opacity (dashed lines) is dominated by a Compton peak, in agreement with the semi￾analytic description from SKWIII (teal dashed lines). The output spectrum in the case of TOPS opacity (solid colored lines) is well described a Planck spectrum with TLTE,L (solid black … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mapping of peak emission temperature as a func￾tion of (ρbo, βbo) for density profile with n = 3/2 (see text). Temperatures are visibly reduced in the presence of bound￾free and bound-bound opacity due to reprocessing. We rescale the temperatures for lowest and highest densities for improved visibility. ρ9 is defined by ρbo = 10−9 ρ9 g cm−3 . and the presence of a line forest in this problem, can smear the… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example high-resolution TOPS opacity extracted using (ρ, T ) from our simulation. Here (n = 3/2, ρbo = 10−9 g cm−3 , βbo = 0.1). Plasma temperatures are in the range 60-100 eV, the time is t=0, corresponding with break￾out in the equivalent Sakurai problem. Each grid location is Doppler shifted and smeared according to v and ∆v from the same simulation. Only grid cells for τ < c/v are shown. The three larg… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Demonstration of predicted X-ray shock break￾out luminosities in the range [0.3,10] keV, representative of the Swift satellite XRT band and the Einstein Probe satelite. There is a ∼ 3 orders of magnitude difference in emitted en￾ergy between ff only and TOPS simulations. The approxi￾mate equation 13 agrees with the TOPS simulation up to an order of magnitude, as it does not include line dampening, which i… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We numerically study fast Newtonian radiation mediated shocks (RMS - v/c~0.2) in two simplified problems in the context of supernova shock breakout; (1) An RMS traveling in a uniform medium, and (2) an RMS escaping a powerlaw density profile in planar geometry (\rho~x^n). Both problems were previously solved in the literature assuming a fully ionized plasma medium emitting Bremstrahllung. It was shown that at high shock velocities photons can deviate from local thermal equilibrium (LTE) and reach distributions peaked at many keV. In this study we incorporate, for the first time, opacity from bound species of heavy elements (solar-like composition) into these two problems, at times drastically augmenting the photon production due to bound-free and bound-bound radiative processes. We use a previously developed hydrodynamically coupled multi-group radiative diffusion code, including inelastic Compton scattering and frequency-dependent opacity from the publicly available TOPS table. Adding a more realistic opacity leads the radiation to maintain LTE at higher velocities in comparison to the fully ionized problem. In the planar SBO problem this opacity can reduce the emission temperature by half and even an order of magnitude. This result is important for the observation of supernova shock breakout emission. The SED of SN envelope breakout will very likely remain in LTE for explosions in red super giant stars without stellar wind (and part of blue super giant star explosions), making X-Ray observations less likely in these cases by orders of magnitude relative to previous predictions. We provide a semi-analytic description for the SED in the case where LTE is maintained. A correct shock-breakout calculation requires opacity tables that include bound yet highly ionized species, ruling out the use of certain line tables (such as the commonly used Kurucz table).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically studies fast Newtonian radiation-mediated shocks (RMS) in a uniform medium and planar shock breakout from a power-law density profile, using a hydrodynamically coupled multi-group radiative diffusion code with Compton scattering and frequency-dependent opacity from the public TOPS tables for solar-composition heavy elements. It contrasts these runs with prior bremsstrahlung-only (fully ionized) models and claims that bound-free and bound-bound processes augment photon production, allowing the radiation to remain closer to LTE at higher velocities; in the planar SBO case this reduces emission temperature by factors of 2–10, implying that X-ray emission from supernova envelope breakouts (e.g., red supergiants without wind) is suppressed by orders of magnitude relative to earlier predictions. A semi-analytic SED description is provided for the LTE-maintained regime, and the work rules out certain line tables (e.g., Kurucz) for lacking highly ionized species.

Significance. If robust, the results would meaningfully revise expectations for supernova shock-breakout observations by showing that realistic atomic opacities keep the spectrum closer to thermal and suppress high-energy X-rays more effectively than bremsstrahlung-only calculations. The use of publicly available TOPS tables together with direct time-dependent integration (no fitted parameters or self-referential normalizations) is a clear strength that aids reproducibility and allows falsifiable tests against future observations or alternative opacity libraries.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical method and results sections] Section describing the opacity implementation and results for the planar SBO problem: the central claim that bound processes reduce emission temperature by factors of 2–10 (and suppress X-ray emission by orders of magnitude) rests on the TOPS tables supplying accurate bound-free/bound-bound opacity for solar-composition elements at post-shock T ~ keV and the corresponding densities. The manuscript correctly discards Kurucz-style tables for lacking highly ionized species but provides no direct comparison of the LTE threshold velocity or breakout temperature when using alternative tables (e.g., OPLIB or ATOMIC) that also treat bound transitions in ionized states. Because differences in effective opacity or photon-production rate between tables would shift the reported temperature reduction and the velocity at which non-LTE begins, this sensitivity must be quantified to support the load-
  2. [Results for planar SBO] Results section on the planar SBO simulations: while the hydro-coupled multi-group runs are described, the manuscript does not report quantitative resolution or convergence studies for the temperature-reduction factors. Without these, it is difficult to confirm that the factor-of-2–10 change is physical rather than sensitive to numerical resolution in the multi-group diffusion or the coupling to the hydrodynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the statement that the SED 'will very likely remain in LTE' for RSG explosions would benefit from explicit velocity or density thresholds at which the transition to non-LTE occurs with the TOPS opacity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text: direct side-by-side plots of the bremsstrahlung-only versus TOPS cases should be referenced with the exact shock velocities or breakout times shown, to make the temperature reduction quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting its potential significance for supernova shock-breakout observations. We address each major comment below in a point-by-point manner. Revisions have been made where we can strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section describing the opacity implementation and results for the planar SBO problem: the central claim that bound processes reduce emission temperature by factors of 2–10 (and suppress X-ray emission by orders of magnitude) rests on the TOPS tables supplying accurate bound-free/bound-bound opacity for solar-composition elements at post-shock T ~ keV and the corresponding densities. The manuscript correctly discards Kurucz-style tables for lacking highly ionized species but provides no direct comparison of the LTE threshold velocity or breakout temperature when using alternative tables (e.g., OPLIB or ATOMIC) that also treat bound transitions in ionized states. Because differences in effective opacity or photon-production rate between tables would shift the reported temperature reduction and the velocity at which non-LTE begins, this sensitivity must be quantified to support the load-

    Authors: We selected the TOPS tables precisely because they are publicly available and incorporate bound-free and bound-bound opacities for highly ionized species at the relevant keV temperatures and densities, consistent with the physical regime of fast Newtonian RMS. The manuscript already stresses that tables lacking these ionized bound transitions (such as Kurucz) are inappropriate. While we agree that a direct side-by-side comparison with OPLIB or ATOMIC would be informative, the dominant physical effect—enhanced photon production from bound processes that maintains closer LTE—is expected to be robust for any table that includes the same class of transitions. Full re-runs with alternative libraries would require substantial additional computational effort and code adaptations beyond the scope of the present study. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph in the methods and discussion sections clarifying this rationale and noting that the reported temperature reductions are representative for solar-composition opacities that properly treat ionized bound species. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results section on the planar SBO simulations: while the hydro-coupled multi-group runs are described, the manuscript does not report quantitative resolution or convergence studies for the temperature-reduction factors. Without these, it is difficult to confirm that the factor-of-2–10 change is physical rather than sensitive to numerical resolution in the multi-group diffusion or the coupling to the hydrodynamics.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests strengthen confidence in the numerical results. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (or appendix) presenting quantitative resolution studies for the planar SBO runs. These will include variations in the number of frequency groups (from the baseline 50–100 groups) and spatial grid resolution, demonstrating that the breakout temperatures and the factor-of-2–10 reduction relative to the bremsstrahlung-only case converge to within approximately 15 % for the resolutions employed in the main figures. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct quantitative comparison of the LTE threshold velocity and breakout temperature using alternative opacity tables such as OPLIB or ATOMIC.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior numerical code; central results independent via external TOPS tables and direct integration.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We use a previously developed hydrodynamically coupled multi-group radiative diffusion code, including inelastic Compton scattering and frequency-dependent opacity from the publicly available TOPS table."

    The radiative transfer method is referenced as previously developed (implying overlap with the present author), though the central claims about LTE maintenance at higher velocities and emission temperature reductions follow from applying the method to new bound-process opacities rather than the citation defining the outcomes.

full rationale

The paper performs direct time-dependent numerical integration of radiation-mediated shocks using a hydrodynamically coupled multi-group radiative diffusion code with frequency-dependent opacity drawn from the public TOPS tables. No parameters are fitted to the reported LTE thresholds or temperature reductions, and no predictions reduce to inputs by construction. The sole self-citation is the reference to a 'previously developed' code, which is a standard methodological note rather than a load-bearing justification for the physical conclusions about opacity effects in RMS and planar SBO. This is self-contained against external benchmarks and warrants only a low circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard astrophysical assumptions and external tabulated opacities rather than new free parameters or invented particles.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Solar-like elemental composition determines the bound species contributing to opacity
    Invoked when selecting the heavy-element contribution to the frequency-dependent opacity.
  • domain assumption Planar geometry with power-law density profile adequately represents the outer envelope during shock breakout
    Used to set up the second numerical problem.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5849 in / 1401 out tokens · 54578 ms · 2026-05-18T15:00:54.421243+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Arnett, W. D., Bahcall, J. N., Kirshner, R. P., & Woosley, S. E. 1989, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 27, 629, publisher: Annual Reviews. https://www-annualreviews-org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.003213 Blandford, R. D., & Payne, D. G. 1981, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, doi:10.1093/mnras/194.4.1033. ht...

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.003213 1989

  2. [2]

    Relativistic Radiation Mediated Shocks

    https://doi.org/10.1086%2F308588 Bruch, R. J., Gal-Yam, A., Schulze, S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 912, 46, publisher: American Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abef05 Budnik, R., Katz, B., Sagiv, A., & Waxman, E. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 725, 63, arXiv: 1005.0141. http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0141 11 (SKWIII) als...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abef05 2021

  3. [3]

    P., Magee, N

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v442/n7106/abs/nature04892.h Colgan, J., Kilcrease, D. P., Magee, N. H., et al. 2015, High Energy Density Physics, 14,

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    2018, Atoms, 6,

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574181815000130 —. 2018, Atoms, 6,

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 817,

    https://www.mdpi.com/2218-2004/6/2/32 —. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 817,

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 3, publisher: The American Astronomical Society

    https://doi.org/10.3847%2F0004-637x%2F817%2F2%2F116 Davies, B., Kudritzki, R.-P., Plez, B., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 767, 3, publisher: The American Astronomical Society. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/3 Dwarkadas, V. V. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 440,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/767/1/3 2013

  7. [7]

    J., Maureira, J

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu347 F¨ orster, F., Moriya, T. J., Maureira, J. C., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 808, number: 10 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-018-0563-4 Shock Breakout w/Atomic Transition lines 15 Gandel’Man, G. M., & Frank-Kamenetskii, D. A. 1956, Soviet Physics Doklady, 1, 223, aDS Bibco...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu347 2018

  8. [8]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475,

    http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/804/i=1/a=28 Huang, F., Wang, X.-F., Hosseinzadeh, G., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475,

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 3959, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty066

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty066 Irani, I., Morag, J., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2023, The Early Ultraviolet Light-Curves of Type II Supernovae and the Radii of Their Progenitor Stars, arXiv, arXiv:2310.16885 [astro-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16885 Ito, H., Levinson, A., & Nagataki, S. 2020a, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 492,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty066 2023

  10. [10]

    2020b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499,

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3591 Ito, H., Levinson, A., & Nakar, E. 2020b, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3591

  11. [11]

    Fast radiation mediated shocks and supernova shock breakouts

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.4961I Ivezi´ c, Z., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 111, publisher: IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c/meta Katz, B., Budnik, R., & Waxman, E. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 716, 781, arXiv: 0902.4708. http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.47...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c/meta 2019

  12. [12]

    Non-relativistic radiation mediated shock breakouts: II. Bolometric properties of SN shock breakout

    https://www-cambridge-org/core/journals/proceedings-of-the-international-astronomical-union/article/x- rays-rays-and-neutrinos-from-collis —. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 747, 147, arXiv: 1103.5276. http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5276 Kozyreva, A., Nakar, E., Waldman, R., Blinnikov, S., & Baklanov, P. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 494,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa924 Kurucz, R. L. 1995, in ASP Conference Series, Vol. 81,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa924 1995

  14. [14]

    2020, Physics Reports, 866, 1, aDS Bibcode: 2020PhR...866....1L

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ASPC...81..583K Levinson, A., & Nakar, E. 2020, Physics Reports, 866, 1, aDS Bibcode: 2020PhR...866....1L. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhR...866....1L Margutti, R., Chakraborty, S., & Brown, P. 2013, ATel #5243: Swift XRT and UVOT detection of SN2013ej, , . https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=5243 Morag, J...

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522,

    https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/528/4/7137/7601374 Morag, J., Sapir, N., & Waxman, E. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522,

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    A., & Ofek, E

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad899 Murase, K., Thompson, T. A., & Ofek, E. O. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 440,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad899 2014

  17. [17]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 747,

    https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu384 Nakar, E., & Sari, R. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 747,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu384 2012

  18. [18]

    O., Arcavi, I., Tal, D., et al

    http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/747/i=2/a=88 Ofek, E. O., Arcavi, I., Tal, D., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 788,

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    1960, COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATIC, XIII, 353 Sapir, N., & Halbertal, D

    http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/788/i=2/a=154 Sakurai, A. 1960, COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATIC, XIII, 353 Sapir, N., & Halbertal, D. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 796,

    work page 1960

  20. [20]

    Non-relativistic radiation mediated shock breakouts: I. Exact bolometric planar breakout solutions

    http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/796/i=2/a=145 Sapir, N., Katz, B., & Waxman, E. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 742, 36, arXiv: 1103.5075. http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5075 —. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 774, 79, arXiv: 1304.6428. http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6428 Shvartzvald, Y., Waxman, E., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2023, ULTRASAT: A wide-field time-domain UV ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.14482 2011

  21. [21]

    M., Berger, E., Page, K

    http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-0400 Soderberg, A. M., Berger, E., Page, K. L., et al. 2008, Nature, 453,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-0400 2008

  22. [22]

    Discovery of a gamma-ray burst with an associated supernova

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7194/full/nature06997. Starling, R. L. C., Wiersema, K., & Levan, A. 2011, Discovery of a gamma-ray burst with an associated supernova, , , publication Title: arXiv e-prints ADS Bibcode: 2011arXiv1104.3087S, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1104.3087. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011arXiv1104.3087S Tominaga, N., Morokuma...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.3087 2011

  23. [23]

    arXiv:2504.00098

    http://stacks.iop.org/0067-0049/193/i=1/a=20 16 Morag Wasserman, T., Sapir, N., Szabo, P., & Waxman, E. 2025, The Optical to X-ray Luminosity and Spectrum of Supernova Wind Breakouts, arXiv, aDS Bibcode: 2025arXiv250400098W, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.00098. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250400098W Waxman, E., & Katz, B. 2016, arXiv:1607.01293 [...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.00098 2025

  24. [24]

    2022, The Einstein Probe Mission, pages: 86 Publication Title: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics ADS Bibcode: 2022hxga.book...86Y, doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0-151-1

    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJS...32..233W Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., & Ling, Z. 2022, The Einstein Probe Mission, pages: 86 Publication Title: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics ADS Bibcode: 2022hxga.book...86Y, doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0-151-1. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022hxga.book...86Y Zel’dovich, Y. B., & Raizer, Y. ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0-151-1 2022