pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.17633 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Selective reflection of light in glassforming ternary liquid crystalline mixtures

Aleksandra Deptuch , Zuzanna Zaj\k{a}c , Marcin Piwowarczyk , Anna Drzewicz , Marcin Kozie{\l} , Magdalena Urba\'nska , Ewa Juszy\'nska-Ga{\l}\k{a}zka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords liquid crystalssmectic phasesselective reflectionglass formationthermochromic effectantiferroelectricferroelectricchiral mixtures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ternary liquid crystal mixtures selectively reflect blue light in the glassy smectic C_A* phase and switch between green or red reflection in the smectic C* phase depending on thermal history.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates two ternary liquid crystalline mixtures and characterizes them with calorimetry, microscopy, X-ray diffraction and dielectric spectroscopy. It detects paraelectric smectic A*, ferroelectric smectic C* and antiferroelectric smectic C_A* phases, with the C_A* phase forming a glass at moderate cooling rates that prevents transition to a hexatic phase. One mixture exhibits a strong thermochromic effect and reflects blue light when glassy, while both mixtures reflect either green or red light in the smectic C* phase according to whether the sample is cooled or heated and the rate of change. A sympathetic reader would care because the results show how vitrification can lock in specific reflection colors and how thermal path can tune the reflected color in these phases.

Core claim

Two ternary liquid crystalline mixtures are formulated and investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Paraelectric smectic A*, ferroelectric smectic C*, and antiferroelectric smectic C_A* phases are detected. The glass of the smectic C_A* phase is formed at moderate cooling rates. Vitrification prevents the approaching transition to a hexatic smectic phase. One mixture shows a strong thermochromic effect in the smectic C_A* phase and selectively reflects blue light in the glassy state. Both mixtures reflect either green or red light in the smectic C* phase, depending on temperature treatment: whe

What carries the argument

The helical pitch in the chiral smectic C* and C_A* phases that produces selective reflection at wavelengths set by the pitch length.

If this is right

  • Glass formation in the smectic C_A* phase stabilizes selective blue reflection.
  • The reflected color in the smectic C* phase depends on whether the sample is cooled or heated and on the rate of temperature change.
  • Vitrification at moderate cooling rates avoids the hexatic smectic phase transition.
  • Both mixtures exhibit history-dependent reflection colors in the smectic C* phase.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These mixtures may enable optical elements whose color records prior thermal exposure.
  • The color switching in the smectic C* phase may arise from different helical structures stabilized by different thermal paths.
  • Similar selective reflection and glass formation could be tested in other ternary or multicomponent chiral liquid crystal systems.

Load-bearing premise

The selective reflection and thermochromic shifts arise solely from the helical pitch of the identified smectic C* and C_A* phases rather than from alignment artifacts, impurities, or surface effects.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the helical pitch in the smectic C* and C_A* phases together with quantitative comparison to the observed wavelengths of reflected blue, green and red light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.17633 by Aleksandra Deptuch, Anna Drzewicz, Ewa Juszy\'nska-Ga{\l}\k{a}zka, Magdalena Urba\'nska, Marcin Kozie{\l}, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Zuzanna Zaj\k{a}c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Molecular structures of MIXmHFHH6 (m = 5, 6) components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: DSC thermograms for MIX5HFHH6 at cooling (a) and heating (b) with corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: DSC thermograms for MIX6HFHH6 at cooling (a) and heating (b) with corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Selected BDS spectra of MIX6HFHH6 (points) in SmA* at 391 K and SmC* at 381 K (a), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Activation plot of relaxation times obtained from the BDS spectra of MIXmHFHH6 with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two ternary liquid crystalline mixtures are formulated and investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Paraelectric smectic A*, ferroelectric smectic C*, and antiferroelectric smectic C$_A$* phases are detected. The glass of the smectic C$_A$* phase is formed at moderate cooling rates. Vitrification prevents the approaching transition to a hexatic smectic phase. One mixture shows a strong thermochromic effect in the smectic C$_A$* phase and selectively reflects blue light in the glassy state. Both mixtures reflect either green or red light in the smectic C* phase, depending on temperature treatment: whether the sample is cooled or heated, or at which rate the temperature changes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates and characterizes two ternary liquid crystalline mixtures using DSC, POM, XRD, and broadband dielectric spectroscopy. It identifies paraelectric SmA*, ferroelectric SmC*, and antiferroelectric SmC_A* phases, reports glass formation in the SmC_A* phase at moderate cooling rates that prevents a hexatic transition, and describes selective reflection of blue light in the glassy SmC_A* state for one mixture along with history- and rate-dependent green or red reflection in the SmC* phase for both mixtures.

Significance. If the selective reflection is confirmed to arise from tunable helical pitch in these glassforming chiral smectics, the work would add to understanding of thermochromic behavior and vitrification effects in liquid crystals, with potential relevance for optical materials. The multi-technique approach (DSC, POM, XRD, dielectric) provides solid phase identification, though the absence of direct pitch quantification limits the strength of the central interpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and Results sections: The central claim that observed selective reflection (blue in glassy C_A*, green/red in C* depending on thermal history) originates from the helical pitch of the identified smectic phases lacks direct quantitative support; no helical pitch values (e.g., from Cano-wedge disclination spacing or Bragg wavelength fitting to reflection spectra) or thickness-dependent controls are reported, leaving surface alignment artifacts or impurity effects as viable alternatives.
  2. [Results] Results/Discussion: The strong dependence on cooling/heating rates and temperature treatment is stated qualitatively, but without raw reflection spectra, error bars on color observations, or composition tables for the ternary mixtures, the robustness of the thermochromic effect and its attribution to bulk pitch variation cannot be evaluated from the presented data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The abstract and methods would benefit from explicit sample thicknesses, alignment procedures, and any checks for surface-induced coloration to strengthen the interpretation.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions or text should clarify whether the reported colors are observed in transmission or reflection and include any quantitative wavelength data if available.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where the manuscript will be strengthened without misrepresenting the existing data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results sections: The central claim that observed selective reflection (blue in glassy C_A*, green/red in C* depending on thermal history) originates from the helical pitch of the identified smectic phases lacks direct quantitative support; no helical pitch values (e.g., from Cano-wedge disclination spacing or Bragg wavelength fitting to reflection spectra) or thickness-dependent controls are reported, leaving surface alignment artifacts or impurity effects as viable alternatives.

    Authors: We agree that direct quantitative measurements of helical pitch would provide stronger support for the interpretation. The observed selective reflection colors are a standard signature of the helical superstructure in chiral smectic phases, and the history-dependent color shifts align with known effects of vitrification on pitch in antiferroelectric and ferroelectric smectics. In the revised manuscript, we will add estimates of the helical pitch derived from the Bragg condition applied to the observed reflection wavelengths (blue ~450 nm, green ~550 nm, red ~650 nm), using a typical average refractive index of 1.5 for these mixtures. We will also clarify that Cano-wedge measurements are impractical in the glassy state due to high viscosity and will include notes on consistent observations across different cell thicknesses to address potential surface or alignment artifacts. Impurity effects are unlikely given the high-purity starting materials and reproducible phase behavior confirmed by multiple techniques. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results/Discussion: The strong dependence on cooling/heating rates and temperature treatment is stated qualitatively, but without raw reflection spectra, error bars on color observations, or composition tables for the ternary mixtures, the robustness of the thermochromic effect and its attribution to bulk pitch variation cannot be evaluated from the presented data.

    Authors: We acknowledge that more quantitative presentation would improve evaluation of the thermochromic robustness. The color changes are documented through repeated POM observations under controlled heating/cooling protocols, with the attribution to pitch variation supported by the correlation with vitrification (preventing hexatic transitions) as evidenced by DSC, XRD, and dielectric data. In the revised version, we will add a table detailing the exact compositions of the two ternary mixtures. We will also expand the results section with additional details on the thermal history protocols and include any available reflection spectra in the supplementary information, along with qualitative descriptions of reproducibility across samples. Full error bars are not applicable to visual color assignments but repeated observations confirm consistency. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Purely experimental report with no derivation chain or self-referential steps

full rationale

The paper presents experimental results from DSC, POM, XRD, and dielectric spectroscopy on two ternary mixtures, identifying smectic phases and describing observed selective reflection colors under different thermal histories and vitrification. No equations, fitted parameters, models, or derivations appear in the provided text. Claims rest on direct empirical observations rather than any chain that reduces by construction to inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes. This is a standard experimental study whose central findings do not invoke or depend on internal circular logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities; the report rests on standard phase-identification conventions in liquid-crystal science and the assumption that selective reflection indicates helical order.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assignment of smectic A*, C*, and C_A* phases from DSC, POM, XRD, and BDS signatures
    Invoked implicitly when stating phase detection; these assignments follow long-established protocols in the field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5699 in / 1254 out tokens · 55633 ms · 2026-05-18T14:46:21.635777+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Lagerwall , F

    J.P.F. Lagerwall , F. Giesselmann, Current Topics in Smectic Liquid Crystal Research, ChemPhysChem 7 (2006) 20 -45, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200500472

    work page doi:10.1002/cphc.200500472 2006

  2. [2]

    Sage, Thermochromic liquid crystals, Liq

    I. Sage, Thermochromic liquid crystals, Liq. Cryst. 38 (2011) 1551-1561, https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2011.631302

    work page doi:10.1080/02678292.2011.631302 2011

  3. [3]

    J. Li, H. Takezoe, A. Fukuda, Novel Temperature Dependences of Helical Pitch in Ferroelectric and Antiferroelectric Chiral Smectic Liquid Crystals, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1991) 532-536, https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.30.532

    work page doi:10.1143/jjap.30.532 1991

  4. [4]

    Żurowska, R

    M. Żurowska, R. Dąbrowski, J. Dziaduszek, K. Garbat, M. Filipowicz, M. Tykarska, W. Rejmer, K. Czupryński, A. Spadło, N. Bennis, J.M. Otón, Influence of alkoxy chain length and fluorosubstitution on mesogenic and spectral properties of high tilted antiferroelectric esters, J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 2144-2153, https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM02015J

    work page doi:10.1039/c0jm02015j 2011

  5. [5]

    Golicha, M.H

    H.S.A. Golicha, M.H. Omar, N.M. Mbithi, Optical Techniques in the Determination of Pitch Lengths in the Cholesteric and Chiral Smectic C Phases, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 10 (2021) 1-5

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Mrukiewicz, M

    M. Mrukiewicz, M. Cigl, P. Perkowski, J. Karcz, V. Hamplová, A. Bubnov, Dual tunability of selective reflection by light and electric field for self-organizing materials, J. Mol. Liq. 400 (2024) 124540, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124540

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124540 2024

  7. [7]

    Krueger, F

    M. Krueger, F. Giesselmann, Laser -light diffraction studies on the electric -field response of the helical director configuration in smectic-C* liquid crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 094102, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2717609

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2717609 2007

  8. [8]

    A. Drzewicz, Insight into phase situation and kinetics of cold - and melt crystallization processes of chiral smectogenic liquid crystals, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2023, https://doi.org/10.48733/978 -83- 63542-37-5

    work page doi:10.48733/978 2023

  9. [9]

    Deptuch, M

    A. Deptuch, M. Jasiurkowska -Delaporte, W. Zając, E. Juszyńska -Gałązka, A. Drzewicz, M. Urbańska, Investigation of crystallization kinetics and its relationship with molecular dynamics for chiral fluorinated glassforming smectogen 3F5HPhH6, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 (2021) 19795-19810, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP02297K

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cp02297k 2021

  10. [10]

    Deptuch, M

    A. Deptuch, M. Jasiurkowska-Delaporte, M. Urbańska, S. Baran, Kinetics of cold crystallization in two liquid crystalline fluorinated homologues exhibiting the vitrified smectic C A* phase , J. Mol. Liq. 368 (2022) 120612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120612

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120612 2022

  11. [11]

    Mitov, A

    M. Mitov, A. Boudet, P. Sopéna, From selective to wide -band light reflection: a simple thermal diffusion in a glassy cholesteric liquid crystal, Eur. Phys. J. B 8 (1999) 327-330, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050696

    work page doi:10.1007/s100510050696 1999

  12. [12]

    Tsai, K.-Y

    W.-L. Tsai, K.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Hsueh, K. -T. Wang, C.-C. Wen, H. -M. Lai, P. -S. Weng, Synthesis and Liquid Crystal Properties of Chiral Compounds Containing the Core Structure of 6 -Hydroxynicotinic Acid or 4 -Hydroxyphenylacetic Acid, 53 (2006) 1385-1390, https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.200600183

    work page doi:10.1002/jccs.200600183 2006

  13. [13]

    Osiecka, Z

    N. Osiecka, Z. Galewski, M. Massalska -Arodź, TOApy program for the thermooptical analysis of phase transitions, Thermochim. Acta 655 (2017) 106-111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.012 2017

  14. [14]

    Schneider, W.S

    C.A. Schneider, W.S. Rasband, K.W. Eliceiri, NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat. Methods 9 (2012) 671-675, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

    work page doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 2012

  15. [15]

    Bearden, X-Ray Wavelengths, Rev

    J.A. Bearden, X-Ray Wavelengths, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39 (1967) 78-124, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.39.78

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.39.78 1967

  16. [16]

    C.R. Hubbard, National Bureau of Standards Certificate, Standard Reference Material 675, Low 2θ (Large d -Spacing) Standard for X-Ray Powder Diffraction, https://tsapps.nist.gov/srmext/certificates/675.pdf, access on March 2024. 14

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Roisnel, J

    T. Roisnel, J. Rodríquez -Carvajal, WinPLOTR: A Windows Tool for Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis, Mater. Sci. Forum 378-381 (2001) 118-123, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.378-381.118

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.378-381.118 2001

  18. [18]

    Ghanbari, S.J

    E. Ghanbari, S.J. Picken, J.H. van Esch, Analysis of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): determining the transition temperatures, and enthalpy and heat capacity changes in multicomponent systems by analytical model fitting, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 148 (2023) 12393-12409, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12356-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10973-023-12356-1 2023

  19. [19]

    TA Instruments, Overview of Glass Transition Analysis by Differential Scanning Calorimetry, https://www.tainstruments.com/pdf/literature/TA443.pdf, access on 27th August 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Seddon, Structural studies of Liquid Crystals by X -ray Diffraction, in D

    J.M. Seddon, Structural studies of Liquid Crystals by X -ray Diffraction, in D. Demus, J. Goodby , G.W. Gray, H. -W. Spiess, V. Vill (Eds.), Handbook of Liquid Crystals, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim 1998

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Davidson, Selected Topics in X -Ray Scattering by Liquid -Crystalline Polymers, in D.M.P

    P. Davidson, Selected Topics in X -Ray Scattering by Liquid -Crystalline Polymers, in D.M.P. Mingos (Ed.), Liquid Crystals II. Structure and Bonding, vol 95, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 1999, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68118-3_1

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-68118-3_1 1999

  22. [22]

    The Role of Cnidaria in Drug Discovery

    W. Massa, Crystal Structure Determination, Springer -Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2000, https://doi.org/10.1007/978 -3- 662-04248-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978 2000

  23. [23]

    Havriliak, S

    S. Havriliak, S. Negami, A complex plane analysis of α-dispersions in some polymer systems, J. Polym. Sci. C: Polymer Symposia 14 (1966) 99-117, https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070140111

    work page doi:10.1002/polc.5070140111 1966

  24. [24]

    Haase, S

    W. Haase, S. Wróbel (Eds.), Relaxation phenomena. Liquid crystals, magnetic systems, polymers, high -Tc superconductors, metallic glasses, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2003, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09747-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09747-2 2003

  25. [25]

    Kremer, A

    F. Kremer, A. Schönhals (Eds.), Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy, Springer -Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2003, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56120-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56120-7 2003

  26. [26]

    Buivydas, F

    M. Buivydas, F. Gouda, G. Andersson, S.T. Lagerwall, B. Stebler, J. Bömelburg, G. Heppke, B. Gestblom, Collective and non-collective excitations in antiferroelectric and ferrielectric liquid crystals studied by dielectric relaxation spectroscopy and electro-optic measurements, Liq. Cryst. 23 (1997) 723-739, https://doi.org/10.1080/026782997208000

    work page doi:10.1080/026782997208000 1997

  27. [27]

    Böhmer, K.L

    R. Böhmer, K.L. Ngai, C.A. Angell, D.J. Plazek, Nonexponential relaxations in strong and fragile glass formers , J. Chem. Phys. 99 (1993) 4201-4209, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466117

    work page doi:10.1063/1.466117 1993

  28. [28]

    MOOCdb: Developing Standards and Systems to Support MOOC Data Science

    D. Georgopoulos, S. Krip otou, E. Argyraki, A. Kyritsis, P. Pissis, Study of Isothermal Crystallization Kinetics of 5CB with Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 611 (2015) 197 -207, https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2015.1030259

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1080/15421406.2015.1030259 2015

  29. [29]

    Drozd-Rzoska, S.J

    A. Drozd-Rzoska, S.J. Rzoska, S. Starzonek, New scaling paradigm for dynamics in glass-forming systems, Prog. Mater. Sci. 134 (2023) 101074, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101074

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101074 2023

  30. [30]

    K.L. Ngai, M. Paluch, Classification of secondary relaxation in glass-formers based on dynamic properties , J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 857-873, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1630295

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1630295 2004

  31. [31]

    Mauro, Y

    J.C. Mauro, Y. Yue, A.J. Ellison, P.K. Gupta, D.C. Allan, Viscosity of glass-forming liquids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009) 19780-19784, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911705106

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0911705106 2009

  32. [32]

    Raftopoulos, I

    K.N. Raftopoulos, I. Łukaszewska, S. Lalik, P. Zając, A. Bukowczan, E. Hebda, M. Marzec, K. Pielichowski, Structure- Glass Transition Relationships in Non-Isocyanate Polyhydroxyurethanes , Molecules 29 (2024) 4057, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174057. 15 Selective reflection of light in glassforming ternary liquid crystalline mixtures Aleksandra Dep...

    work page doi:10.3390/molecules29174057 2024