pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2509.18971 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Post-collapse Lagrangian perturbation theory in three dimensions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords post-collapse perturbation theoryLagrangian perturbation theoryshell-crossingpancake formationgravitational collapseVlasov-Poisson simulationscosmological structure formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A perturbative Lagrangian method captures three-dimensional matter evolution after the first shell-crossing by using pancake caustics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops post-collapse perturbation theory (PCPT) that extends Lagrangian perturbation theory into the regime after particles first cross paths during gravitational collapse. High-order standard LPT evolves the system up to shell-crossing, after which one-dimensional results for pancake-like density caustics determine the gravitational backreaction perturbatively. This produces accurate descriptions of early post-collapse dynamics and is validated against Vlasov-Poisson simulations. A sympathetic reader would care because standard perturbation methods fail precisely where cosmic structure formation becomes highly nonlinear.

Core claim

We present the first fully perturbative approach in three dimensions by using Lagrangian coordinates that asymptotically captures the highly nonlinear nature of matter evolution after the first shell-crossing. This is made possible essentially thanks to two basic ingredients: (1) We employ high-order standard Lagrangian perturbation theory to evolve the system until shell-crossing, and (2) we exploit the fact that the density caustic structure near the first shell-crossing begins generically with pancake formation. The latter property allows us to exploit largely known one-dimensional results to determine perturbatively the gravitational backreaction after collapse, yielding accurate results

What carries the argument

Post-collapse perturbation theory (PCPT) that combines high-order Lagrangian perturbation theory up to shell-crossing with one-dimensional pancake-caustic results to compute gravitational backreaction afterward.

If this is right

  • PCPT supplies accurate perturbative solutions for the early stages of post-collapse dynamics.
  • The formalism is validated by direct comparison to high-resolution Vlasov-Poisson simulations.
  • It provides a robust perturbative framework for describing highly nonlinear matter evolution shortly after the first shell-crossing.
  • The approach asymptotically captures the nonlinear regime using only Lagrangian coordinates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • PCPT could serve as an efficient bridge between linear theory and full N-body runs for the onset of multi-streaming in large-scale structure.
  • The pancake-based backreaction step might be generalized to include higher-order caustic geometries that appear later in collapse.
  • Applications to modified gravity or different initial power spectra would test how sensitively post-collapse dynamics depend on the initial conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The density caustic structure near the first shell-crossing begins generically with pancake formation.

What would settle it

If high-resolution Vlasov-Poisson simulations show that PCPT density or velocity predictions deviate substantially from the simulated fields within the early post-shell-crossing window, the perturbative backreaction treatment would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.18971 by Abineet Parichha, Atsushi Taruya, Cornelius Rampf, Shohei Saga, St\'ephane Colombi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of particle locations in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Lagrangian phase-space slices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Same as Fig. 2 but for Q1D-3SIN (top panels) and ANI-3SIN cases (bottom panels), for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Density slices at times indicated in the figures for two- and three-sine waves initial conditions. Top-left, bottom-left, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Lagrangian phase-space slices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as Fig. 5, but for the 3D cases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The gravitational collapse of collisionless matter leads to shell-crossing singularities that challenge the applicability of standard perturbation theory. Here, we present the first fully perturbative approach in three dimensions by using Lagrangian coordinates that asymptotically captures the highly nonlinear nature of matter evolution after the first shell-crossing. This is made possible essentially thanks to two basic ingredients: (1) We employ high-order standard Lagrangian perturbation theory to evolve the system until shell-crossing, and (2) we exploit the fact that the density caustic structure near the first shell-crossing begins generically with pancake formation. The latter property allows us to exploit largely known one-dimensional results to determine perturbatively the gravitational backreaction after collapse, yielding accurate solutions within our post-collapse perturbation theory (PCPT) formalism. We validate the PCPT predictions against high-resolution Vlasov-Poisson simulations and demonstrate that PCPT provides a robust framework for describing the early stages of post-collapse dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a post-collapse Lagrangian perturbation theory (PCPT) in three dimensions for collisionless matter. It evolves the system with high-order standard Lagrangian perturbation theory until the first shell-crossing and then exploits the generic pancake-like caustic structure to incorporate known one-dimensional post-collapse results for the gravitational backreaction, claiming to yield a fully perturbative description that asymptotically captures the early nonlinear regime after shell-crossing, with validation against Vlasov-Poisson simulations.

Significance. If the central construction holds, the work would supply a controlled perturbative extension past the shell-crossing singularity, which remains a key obstacle in analytic modeling of cosmic structure formation. The reuse of established high-order LPT and one-dimensional pancake solutions together with direct simulation benchmarks constitutes a practical strength, though the three-dimensional consistency of the backreaction step determines the overall reach.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the generic pancake formation near first shell-crossing permits the use of one-dimensional results to determine the three-dimensional gravitational backreaction perturbatively is load-bearing. The three-dimensional Poisson equation introduces transverse gradient couplings; it is not shown that small deviations from perfect planarity (unavoidable in generic initial conditions) produce force corrections that remain perturbatively controlled by the planar one-dimensional solutions alone.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Quantitative error measures (e.g., relative L2 norms, convergence with LPT order, or time intervals of validity) are not reported, which would allow readers to gauge the accuracy of the PCPT predictions against the cited simulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying the central claim regarding the three-dimensional consistency of the post-collapse backreaction. We address this point directly below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the discussion of perturbative control.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The claim that the generic pancake formation near first shell-crossing permits the use of one-dimensional results to determine the three-dimensional gravitational backreaction perturbatively is load-bearing. The three-dimensional Poisson equation introduces transverse gradient couplings; it is not shown that small deviations from perfect planarity (unavoidable in generic initial conditions) produce force corrections that remain perturbatively controlled by the planar one-dimensional solutions alone.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating perturbative control over transverse couplings is essential. Near first shell-crossing the density field develops a locally planar caustic structure, with the dominant collapse occurring along one axis while transverse gradients remain parametrically small. In the Poisson equation these transverse terms enter at higher order in the small parameter set by the time elapsed since crossing and the amplitude of transverse perturbations. The manuscript constructs the backreaction by matching the known one-dimensional post-collapse solution onto this locally planar geometry and treats deviations perturbatively. Direct comparison with Vlasov-Poisson simulations in the early post-crossing regime shows that the resulting force corrections remain under control, supporting the validity of the approximation. To make this reasoning more explicit we have added a dedicated paragraph in Section 3 and revised the abstract to state the perturbative ordering more clearly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external 1D results and standard LPT

full rationale

The paper's central construction combines pre-existing high-order Lagrangian perturbation theory evolved to shell-crossing with independently known one-dimensional pancake caustic solutions to model post-collapse 3D gravitational backreaction. These are presented as external inputs rather than quantities fitted or defined inside the present work, and validation is performed against separate Vlasov-Poisson simulations. No quoted equation or claim reduces the PCPT predictions to a self-defined fit, renamed ansatz, or load-bearing self-citation chain by construction; the formalism therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the generic occurrence of pancake caustics at first shell-crossing and on the validity of transplanting 1D post-collapse solutions into 3D geometry; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The density caustic structure near the first shell-crossing begins generically with pancake formation.
    This property is invoked to justify using known one-dimensional results for the gravitational backreaction in three dimensions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1288 out tokens · 39535 ms · 2026-05-18T14:34:10.476707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    we exploit the fact that the density caustic structure near the first shell-crossing begins generically with pancake formation... reduce the problem to an effectively one-dimensional treatment along the collapse axis while retaining the transverse directions as parameters

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Lagrangian phase-space slices In Figs. 2 and 3, we examine Lagrangian phase-space slices,x-v x, after the first shell crossing, by plotting func- tionsx(τ,q)andv x(τ,q)varyingq x while fixingq y and (qy, qz)for the two- and three-sine waves cases, respec- tively. We clearly see that the analytical predictions based on PCPT reproduce well the phase-space s...

  2. [2]

    PHC Sakura

    Eulerian density slices Finally, to further understand how well PCPT is able to describe the multi-stream region and its caustic struc- ture, Eulerian density slices are shown on Fig. 4. Their visual inspection confirms the analyses of the phase-space diagrams. Shortly after collapse (top lines of each group of panels), PCPT predictions clearly improve ov...

  3. [3]

    P.J.E.Peebles,Large-scalebackgroundtemperatureand mass fluctuations due to scale-invariant primeval pertur- bations, ApJ263, L1 (1982)

  4. [4]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Dark matter and the origin of galaxies and globular star clusters, ApJ277, 470 (1984)

  5. [5]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, Formation of galaxies and large-scale struc- ture with cold dark matter., Nature311, 517 (1984)

  6. [6]

    P. J. E. Peebles,The large-scale structure of the universe (1980). 17 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 vx a=0.08 Q1D-2SIN qy = 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.19 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.25 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.48 LPT PCPT Simulation 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 vx a=0.09 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 0.1 0.0 0.1 x 2 1 0 1 2...

  7. [7]

    Large-Scale Structure of the Universe and Cosmological Perturbation Theory

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztañaga, and R. Scoc- cimarro, Large-scale structure of the Universe and cos- mological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551 [astro-ph]

  8. [8]

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Gravitational instability: An approxi- mate theory for large density perturbations., A&A5, 84 (1970)

  9. [9]

    S. F. Shandarin and Ya. B. Zeldovich, The large-scale structure of the universe: Turbulence, intermittency, structures in a self-gravitating medium, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics61, 185 (1989)

  10. [10]

    Buchert, Lagrangian theory of gravitational instabil- ity of Friedman-Lemaitre cosmologies and the ’Zel’dovich approximation’, MNRAS254, 729 (1992)

    T. Buchert, Lagrangian theory of gravitational instabil- ity of Friedman-Lemaitre cosmologies and the ’Zel’dovich approximation’, MNRAS254, 729 (1992)

  11. [11]

    F. R. Bouchet, S. Colombi, E. Hivon, and R. Juszkiewicz, Perturbative Lagrangian approach to gravitational insta- bility., A&A296, 575 (1995), astro-ph/9406013

  12. [12]

    Lagrangian perturbations and the matter bispectrum I: fourth-order model for non-linear clustering

    C. Rampf and T. Buchert, Lagrangian perturbations and the matter bispectrum I: fourth-order model for non- linear clustering, JCAP06, 021, arXiv:1203.4260 [astro- ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Memory of Initial Conditions in Gravitational Clustering

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro, Memory of initial condi- tions in gravitational clustering, Phys. Rev. D73, 063520 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0509419 [astro-ph]

  14. [14]

    Matter power spectrum from a Lagrangian-space regularization of perturbation theory

    P. Valageas, T. Nishimichi, and A. Taruya, Matter power spectrum from a Lagrangian-space regularization of perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D87, 083522 (2013), arXiv:1302.4533 [astro-ph.CO]

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear Evolution of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro, Nonlinear evolution of baryon acoustic oscillations, Phys. Rev. D77, 023533 (2008), arXiv:0704.2783 [astro-ph]

  16. [16]

    A Closure Theory for Non-linear Evolution of Cosmological Power Spectra

    A. Taruya and T. Hiramatsu, A Closure Theory for Non- linear Evolution of Cosmological Power Spectra, ApJ 674, 617 (2008), arXiv:0708.1367 [astro-ph]

  17. [17]

    Resumming Cosmological Perturbations via the Lagrangian Picture: One-loop Results in Real Space and in Redshift Space

    T. Matsubara, Resumming cosmological perturbations via the Lagrangian picture: One-loop results in real space and in redshift space, Phys. Rev. D77, 063530 (2008), arXiv:0711.2521 [astro-ph]

  18. [18]

    Flowing with Time: a New Approach to Nonlinear Cosmological Perturbations

    M. Pietroni, Flowing with time: a new approach to non-linear cosmological perturbations, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2008, 036 (2008), arXiv:0806.0971 [astro- ph]

  19. [19]

    Non-linear Evolution of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Improved Perturbation Theory in Real and Redshift Spaces

    A. Taruya, T. Nishimichi, S. Saito, and T. Hiramatsu, Nonlinear evolution of baryon acoustic oscillations from 18 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 vx a=0.05 qy = 0.0 Q1D-3SIN 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.19 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.25 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 qy = 0.48 LPT PCPT Simulation 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 vx a=0.07 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 0.1 0.0 0.1 2 1 0 1 2 0...

  20. [20]

    Nonlinear Perturbation Theory Integrated with Nonlocal Bias, Redshift-space Distortions, and Primordial Non-Gaussianity

    T. Matsubara, Nonlinear perturbation theory integrated with nonlocal bias, redshift-space distortions, and pri- mordial non-Gaussianity, Phys. Rev. D83, 083518 (2011), arXiv:1102.4619 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Constructing Regularized Cosmic Propagators

    F. Bernardeau, M. Crocce, and R. Scoccimarro, Con- structing regularized cosmic propagators, Phys. Rev. D 85, 123519 (2012), arXiv:1112.3895 [astro-ph.CO]

  22. [22]

    Cosmic propagators at two-loop order

    F. Bernardeau, A. Taruya, and T. Nishimichi, Cosmic propagators at two-loop order, Phys. Rev. D89, 023502 (2014), arXiv:1211.1571 [astro-ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Cosmological perturbation theory at three-loop order

    D.Blas, M.Garny,andT.Konstandin,Cosmologicalper- turbation theory at three-loop order, J. Cosmology As- tropart. Phys.2014, 010 (2014), arXiv:1309.3308 [astro- ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    Response function of the large-scale structure of the universe to the small scale inhomogeneities

    T. Nishimichi, F. Bernardeau, and A. Taruya, Response function of the large-scale structure of the universe to the small scale inhomogeneities, Physics Letters B762, 247 (2016), arXiv:1411.2970 [astro-ph.CO]

  25. [25]

    Halle, T

    A. Halle, T. Nishimichi, A. Taruya, S. Colombi, and F. Bernardeau, Power spectrum response of large-scale structure in 1D and in 3D: tests of prescriptions for post-collapse dynamics, MNRAS499, 1769 (2020), arXiv:2001.10417 [astro-ph.CO]

  26. [26]

    Time-analyticity of Lagrangian particle trajectories in ideal fluid flow

    V. Zheligovsky and U. Frisch, Time-analyticity of La- grangian particle trajectories in ideal fluid flow, Jour- nal of Fluid Mechanics749, 404 (2014), arXiv:1312.6320 [math.AP]

  27. [27]

    How smooth are particle trajectories in a $\Lambda$CDM Universe?

    C. Rampf, B. Villone, and U. Frisch, How smooth are particle trajectories in aΛCDM Universe?, MNRAS452, 1421 (2015), arXiv:1504.00032 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    Rampf, Cosmological Vlasov–Poisson equations for dark matter: Recent developments and connections to selected plasma problems, Rev

    C. Rampf, Cosmological Vlasov–Poisson equations for dark matter: Recent developments and connections to selected plasma problems, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys.5, 10 (2021), arXiv:2110.06265 [astro-ph.CO]

  29. [29]

    Michaux, O

    M. Michaux, O. Hahn, C. Rampf, and R. E. Angulo, Accurate initial conditions for cosmological N-body sim- ulations: minimizing truncation and discreteness er- rors, MNRAS500, 663 (2021), arXiv:2008.09588 [astro- ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    S. Saga, A. Taruya, and S. Colombi, Cold dark mat- ter protohalo structure around collapse: Lagrangian cos- mological perturbation theory versus Vlasov simulations, A&A664, A3 (2022), arXiv:2111.08836 [astro-ph.CO]

  31. [31]

    Rampf and O

    C. Rampf and O. Hahn, Renormalization group and UV completion of cosmological perturbations: Gravitational collapse as a critical phenomenon, Phys. Rev. D107, 023515 (2023), arXiv:2211.02053 [astro-ph.CO]. 19

  32. [32]

    Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid

    D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zal- darriaga, Cosmological non-linearities as an effective fluid, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2012, 051 (2012), arXiv:1004.2488 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, Theeffectivefieldtheoryofcosmologicallargescalestruc- tures, Journal of High Energy Physics2012, 82 (2012), arXiv:1206.2926 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    M. P. Hertzberg, Effective field theory of dark mat- ter and structure formation: Semianalytical results, Phys. Rev. D89, 043521 (2014), arXiv:1208.0839 [astro- ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure at Two Loops: the apparent scale dependence of the speed of sound

    T. Baldauf, L. Mercolli, and M. Zaldarriaga, Effec- tive field theory of large scale structure at two loops: The apparent scale dependence of the speed of sound, Phys. Rev. D92, 123007 (2015), arXiv:1507.02256 [astro- ph.CO]

  36. [36]

    d’Amico, J

    G. d’Amico, J. Gleyzes, N. Kokron, K. Markovic, L. Sen- atore, P. Zhang, F. Beutler, and H. Gil-Marín, The cos- mological analysis of the SDSS/BOSS data from the Ef- fective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys.2020, 005 (2020), arXiv:1909.05271 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro, Pertur- bation theory with dispersion and higher cumulants: Framework and linear theory, Phys. Rev. D107, 063539 (2023), arXiv:2210.08088 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [38]

    Garny, D

    M. Garny, D. Laxhuber, and R. Scoccimarro, Pertur- bation theory with dispersion and higher cumulants: Nonlinear regime, Phys. Rev. D107, 063540 (2023), arXiv:2210.08089 [astro-ph.CO]

  39. [39]

    Garny and R

    M. Garny and R. Scoccimarro, Vlasov Perturbation The- ory and the role of higher cumulants, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.20451 (2025), arXiv:2502.20451 [astro- ph.CO]

  40. [40]

    Vlasov-Poisson in 1D for initially cold systems: post-collapse Lagrangian perturbation theory

    S. Colombi, Vlasov-Poisson in 1D for initially cold systems: post-collapse Lagrangian perturbation the- ory, MNRAS446, 2902 (2015), arXiv:1411.4165 [astro- ph.CO]

  41. [41]

    Post-collapse perturbation theory in 1D cosmology -- beyond shell-crossing

    A. Taruya and S. Colombi, Post-collapse perturbation theory in 1D cosmology - beyond shell-crossing, MNRAS 470, 4858 (2017), arXiv:1701.09088 [astro-ph.CO]

  42. [42]

    Rampf, U

    C. Rampf, U. Frisch, and O. Hahn, Unveiling the singular dynamics in the cosmic large-scale structure, MNRAS 505, L90 (2021)

  43. [43]

    Structure formation beyond shell-crossing: nonperturbative expansions and late-time attractors

    M. Pietroni, Structure formation beyond shell-crossing: nonperturbative expansions and late-time attractors, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018, 028 (2018), arXiv:1804.09140 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    S. Saga, A. Taruya, and S. Colombi, Lagrangian Cosmological Perturbation Theory at Shell Crossing, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 241302 (2018), arXiv:1805.08787 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    S. Saga, S. Colombi, and A. Taruya, The gravitational force field of proto-pancakes, A&A678, A168 (2023), arXiv:2305.13354 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [46]

    ColDICE: a parallel Vlasov-Poisson solver using moving adaptive simplicial tessellation

    T. Sousbie and S. Colombi, ColDICE: A parallel Vlasov- Poisson solver using moving adaptive simplicial tessella- tion, Journal of Computational Physics321, 644 (2016), arXiv:1509.07720 [physics.comp-ph]

  47. [47]

    Colombi, Phase-space structure of protohalos: Vlasov versus particle-mesh, A&A647, A66 (2021), arXiv:2012.04409 [astro-ph.CO]

    S. Colombi, Phase-space structure of protohalos: Vlasov versus particle-mesh, A&A647, A66 (2021), arXiv:2012.04409 [astro-ph.CO]

  48. [48]

    A. G. Doroshkevich, V. S. Ryaben’kii, and S. F. Shan- darin, Nonlinear theory of the development of potential perturbations, Astrophysics9, 144 (1973)

  49. [49]

    A Convenient Set of Comoving Cosmological Variables and Their Application

    H. Martel and P. R. Shapiro, A convenient set of comov- ing cosmological variables and their application, MNRAS 297, 467 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9710119 [astro-ph]

  50. [50]

    F. R. Bouchet, R. Juszkiewicz, S. Colombi, and R. Pellat, Weakly nonlinear gravitational instability for arbitrary Omega, ApJ394, L5 (1992)

  51. [51]

    Buchert and J

    T. Buchert and J. Ehlers, Lagrangian theory of grav- itational instability of Friedman-Lemaitre cosmologies – second-orderapproach: animprovedmodelfornon-linear clustering, MNRAS264, 375 (1993)

  52. [52]

    The Nonlinear Evolution of Rare Events

    F. Bernardeau, The nonlinear evolution of rare events, ApJ427, 51 (1994), astro-ph/9311066

  53. [53]

    The recursion relation in Lagrangian perturbation theory

    C. Rampf, The recursion relation in Lagrangian pertur- bation theory, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2012, 004 (2012), arXiv:1205.5274 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [54]

    Recursive Solutions of Lagrangian Perturbation Theory

    T. Matsubara, Recursive solutions of Lagrangian per- turbation theory, Phys. Rev. D92, 023534 (2015), arXiv:1505.01481 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    Shell-crossing in quasi-one-dimensional flow

    C. Rampf and U. Frisch, Shell-crossing in quasi- one-dimensional flow, MNRAS471, 671 (2017), arXiv:1705.08456 [astro-ph.CO]

  56. [56]

    Schmidt, Ann-th order Lagrangian Forward Model for Large-Scale Structure, J

    F. Schmidt, Ann-th order Lagrangian Forward Model for Large-Scale Structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 04, 033 (2021), arXiv:2012.09837 [astro-ph.CO]

  57. [57]

    Rampf and O

    C. Rampf and O. Hahn, Shell-crossing in aΛCDM Uni- verse, MNRAS501, L71 (2021), arXiv:2010.12584 [astro- ph.CO]

  58. [58]

    Rampf, U

    C. Rampf, U. Frisch, and O. Hahn, Eye of the tyger: Early-time resonances and singularities in the inviscid Burgers equation, Physical Review Fluids7, 104610 (2022), arXiv:2207.12416 [physics.flu-dyn]

  59. [59]

    Rampf, F

    C. Rampf, F. List, and O. Hahn, BullFrog: multi-step perturbation theory as a time integrator for cosmologi- cal simulations, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.02, 020 (2025), arXiv:2409.19049 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    Moutarde, J

    F. Moutarde, J. M. Alimi, F. R. Bouchet, R. Pellat, and A. Ramani, Precollapse Scale Invariance in Gravitational Instability, ApJ382, 377 (1991)

  61. [61]

    Moutarde, J

    F. Moutarde, J. M. Alimi, F. R. Bouchet, and R. Pel- lat, Scale Invariance and Self-Similar Behavior of Dark Matter Halos, ApJ441, 10 (1995)

  62. [62]

    Rampf, S

    C. Rampf, S. Saga, A. Taruya, and S. Colombi, Fast and accurate collapse-time predictions for collisionless mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D108, 103513 (2023), arXiv:2303.12832 [astro-ph.CO]

  63. [63]

    Extending the domain of validity of the Lagrangian approximation

    S. Nadkarni-Ghosh and D. F. Chernoff, Extending the domainofvalidityoftheLagrangianapproximation,MN- RAS410, 1454 (2011), arXiv:1005.1217 [astro-ph.CO]

  64. [64]

    J. A. Fillmore and P. Goldreich, Self-similar gravitational collapse in an expanding universe, ApJ281, 1 (1984)

  65. [65]

    Bertschinger, Self-similar secondary infall and ac- cretion in an Einstein-de Sitter universe, ApJS58, 39 (1985)

    E. Bertschinger, Self-similar secondary infall and ac- cretion in an Einstein-de Sitter universe, ApJS58, 39 (1985)

  66. [66]

    Parichha, S

    A. Parichha, S. Colombi, S. Saga, and A. Taruya, Dark matter halo dynamics in 2D Vlasov simula- tions: A self-similar approach, A&A697, A218 (2025), arXiv:2501.07001 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [67]

    Earth-mass dark-matter haloes as the first structures in the early Universe

    J. Diemand, B. Moore, and J. Stadel, Earth-mass dark- matter haloes as the first structures in the early Universe, Nature433, 389 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501589 [astro- ph]

  68. [68]

    Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Halos and the Free Streaming Scale

    T. Ishiyama, Hierarchical Formation of Dark Matter Ha- 20 los and the Free Streaming Scale, ApJ788, 27 (2014), arXiv:1404.1650 [astro-ph.CO]

  69. [69]

    What sets the central structure of dark matter haloes?

    G. Ogiya and O. Hahn, What sets the central struc- ture of dark matter haloes?, MNRAS473, 4339 (2018), arXiv:1707.07693 [astro-ph.CO]

  70. [70]

    M. S. Delos, A. L. Erickcek, A. P. Bailey, and M. A. Al- varez, Are ultracompact minihalos really ultracompact?, Phys. Rev. D97, 041303 (2018), arXiv:1712.05421 [astro- ph.CO]

  71. [71]

    M. S. Delos, A. L. Erickcek, A. P. Bailey, and M. A. Al- varez, Density profiles of ultracompact minihalos: Impli- cations for constraining the primordial power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D98, 063527 (2018), arXiv:1806.07389 [astro- ph.CO]

  72. [72]

    M. S. Delos and S. D. M. White, Inner cusps of the first dark matter haloes: formation and survival in a cosmological context, MNRAS518, 3509 (2023), arXiv:2207.05082 [astro-ph.CO]

  73. [73]

    M. S. Delos and S. D. M. White, Prompt cusps and the dark matter annihilation signal, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023, 008 (2023), arXiv:2209.11237 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, ApJ462, 563 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9508025 [astro-ph]

  75. [75]

    Caustic Skeleton & Cosmic Web

    J. Feldbrugge, R. van de Weygaert, J. Hidding, and J. Feldbrugge, Caustic Skeleton & Cosmic Web, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2018, 027 (2018), arXiv:1703.09598 [astro-ph.CO]