pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19190 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Orbital-Selective Band Structure Evolution in BaFe_(2-x)M_xAs₂ (M = Cr, Co, Cu, Ru and Mn) Probed by Polarization-Dependent ARPES

K. R. Pakuszewski , M. R. Cantarino , I. Romanenko , A. P. Machado , M. M. Piva , G. S. Freitas , H. B. Pizzi , F. A. Garcia
show 2 more authors
P. G. Pagliuso C. Adriano
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords ARPESiron-based superconductorsband structurespin-density wavesubstitution effectsorbital selectivityBaFe2As2Fe-As bond length
0
0 comments X

The pith

Suppression of the spin-density wave transition in BaFe2-xMxAs2 is primarily driven by changes in the Fe-As bond length, with stronger impact on planar-character electronic states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses polarization-dependent ARPES to track band structure changes in BaFe2-xMxAs2 for five different metal substitutions at low levels chosen for similar spin-density wave transition temperatures. Central hole pockets show little variation and no clear tie to T_SDW or arsenic height, while a modest expansion of one electron pocket tracks the drop in T_SDW. The authors link this behavior to alterations in the Fe-As bond length rather than other structural parameters. This influence appears strongest on states with planar orbital character. The findings point to local bond geometry as a controlling factor in the electronic structure of these compounds.

Core claim

In BaFe2-xMxAs2 (M = Cr, Co, Cu, Ru, Mn) at low substitution levels with comparable T_SDW, the central hole pockets remain largely unchanged with no correlation to T_SDW or As height, whereas a modest increase in the η_X electron pocket size correlates with T_SDW suppression; this contraction of the pocket is tied to rising As height, leading to the conclusion that Fe-As bond length changes primarily suppress T_SDW and do so more strongly in planar-character states.

What carries the argument

Polarization-dependent ARPES that separates orbital characters of bands, used to compare pocket sizes and structural parameters such as Fe-As bond length across substitutions.

If this is right

  • Central hole pockets (α, β, γ) stay similar in size across substitutions and do not track T_SDW.
  • A modest increase in η_X electron pocket size correlates directly with suppression of T_SDW.
  • Contraction of the η_X pocket is associated with increased As height above the Fe planes.
  • Fe-As bond length variations drive T_SDW suppression more than As height changes alone.
  • The bond-length effect is stronger in electronic states that have planar orbital character.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Isovalent substitutions that hold Fe-As bond length fixed might preserve high T_SDW despite other doping changes.
  • Similar orbital-selective sensitivity to bond length could appear under applied pressure or uniaxial strain in related compounds.
  • Tuning superconductivity in this family may benefit from targeting bond length rather than carrier concentration.

Load-bearing premise

Low substitution levels and comparable T_SDW values across the five dopants produce sufficiently controlled comparisons without confounding changes in disorder, carrier density, or As height that are not captured by the reported trends.

What would settle it

High-resolution structural measurements on the same samples showing no systematic correlation between Fe-As bond length and either T_SDW values or the size shifts in planar-character bands would falsify the main claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.19190 by A. P. Machado, C. Adriano, F. A. Garcia, G. S. Freitas, H. B. Pizzi, I. Romanenko, K. R. Pakuszewski, M. M. Piva, M. R. Cantarino, P. G. Pagliuso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the macroscopic measurements and ARPES [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: ARPES spectral function analysis. MDC waterfall plots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of the ARPES measurements for the BFA parent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: kz-dispersion measurements of Cr-BFA taken along the ΓX direction using π polarization. (a) Fermi surface map as a function of excitation energy (hν) and in-plane momentum (kx). (b) MDC waterfall plot corresponding to the data in panel (a). Green and blue circles/triangles indicate the extracted band positions, obtained from Lorentzian fits to the MDCs. Turning our attention to the central bands at the Γ p… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Summary of the hole band dispersion analysis for the BaFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the hole bands across the BaFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Summary of the electron band dispersion analysis for the BaFe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the electron bands across the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evolution of the scattering rate Γ(E) across the BaFe2-xMxAs2 family as a function of binding energy E. The data were extracted from spectral fittings of the BMs measured along the ΓM direction using σ polarization. We now focus on the analysis of the spectral function it￾self. As previously mentioned, the ARPES spectral function depends on two key quantities: the renormalization function Z(E) and the sca… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of the evolution of the band structure in the Fe-based superconductor family BaFe$_{2-x}$M$_x$As$_2$ (M = Cr, Co, Cu, Ru and Mn) using polarization-dependent angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Low-substituted samples, with comparable spin-density wave transition temperatures ($T_\text{SDW}$), were chosen to facilitate controlled comparisons. The sizes of the central hole pockets ($\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$) remain largely unchanged across different substitutions, showing no clear correlation with either $T_\text{SDW}$ or the As height relative to the Fe planes. However, subtle trends are observed: a modest increase in the size of the $\eta_\text{X}$ electron pocket correlates with the suppression of $T_\text{SDW}$. Furthermore, the contraction of the $\eta_\text{X}$ pocket appears to be linked to an increase in the As height relative to the Fe planes. Our results suggest that the suppression of $T_\text{SDW}$ is primarily driven by changes in the Fe-As bond length, with the effect being more pronounced in electronic states with planar character. These findings provide insight into the electronic structure of BaFe$_{2-x}$M$_x$As$_2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports a polarization-dependent ARPES study of band-structure evolution in low-substituted BaFe_{2-x}M_xAs_2 (M = Cr, Co, Cu, Ru, Mn) samples chosen to have comparable T_SDW. Hole-pocket sizes (α, β, γ) are reported as largely unchanged with no clear correlation to T_SDW or As height, while the η_X electron pocket exhibits subtle trends: a modest size increase that correlates with T_SDW suppression and a contraction linked to increased As height. The authors conclude that T_SDW suppression is driven primarily by Fe-As bond-length changes, with stronger effects in planar-character states.

Significance. If the reported trends in the η_X pocket survive quantitative error analysis and controls for dopant-specific confounders, the work would add useful experimental constraints on how local structural parameters (Fe-As distance) modulate the electronic states relevant to the SDW transition in the 122 family, complementing existing doping studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that T_SDW suppression is 'primarily driven by changes in the Fe-As bond length' rests on qualitative visual inspection of ARPES maps; no quantitative error bars on pocket areas, no statistical test of the η_X–T_SDW correlation, and no explicit data-exclusion criteria are provided, leaving the robustness of the correlation unclear.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the choice of low-substitution samples with comparable T_SDW does not address potential confounding variables introduced by chemically distinct dopants (valence mismatch, ionic-size differences, disorder potentials) that can alter carrier density and scattering independently of As height; no decomposition or control measurements for these effects are described.
minor comments (1)
  1. The polarization dependence used to assign orbital character to the η_X pocket should be shown explicitly with raw data or matrix-element calculations in the main text or supplementary information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the concerns about the quantitative robustness of the central claims and potential dopant-specific confounders below, providing the strongest honest responses based on the existing data and analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that T_SDW suppression is 'primarily driven by changes in the Fe-As bond length' rests on qualitative visual inspection of ARPES maps; no quantitative error bars on pocket areas, no statistical test of the η_X–T_SDW correlation, and no explicit data-exclusion criteria are provided, leaving the robustness of the correlation unclear.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support strengthens the interpretation. The trends in the η_X pocket were identified through direct comparison of Fermi surface maps and energy-momentum cuts across samples, with the correlation to T_SDW and As height emerging from the systematic choice of comparable T_SDW. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars on extracted pocket areas (derived from Lorentzian fits to multiple momentum distribution curves) and include a Pearson correlation coefficient with p-value for the η_X size versus T_SDW trend. Data-exclusion criteria were limited to discarding spectra with poor signal-to-noise or surface contamination, as stated in the methods; we will make this explicit in a dedicated paragraph. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the choice of low-substitution samples with comparable T_SDW does not address potential confounding variables introduced by chemically distinct dopants (valence mismatch, ionic-size differences, disorder potentials) that can alter carrier density and scattering independently of As height; no decomposition or control measurements for these effects are described.

    Authors: The low-substitution regime and matched T_SDW were chosen precisely to reduce the magnitude of dopant-specific effects while isolating structural changes. We acknowledge that valence mismatch, ionic radii, and disorder can still influence carrier density and scattering. The revised manuscript will expand the discussion section to compare our observed band shifts with published Hall-effect and resistivity data on the same doping series, thereby addressing possible carrier-density changes. However, our ARPES dataset does not contain the additional control samples or decomposition analysis needed to fully separate these contributions from the Fe-As bond-length effect. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental ARPES observations with direct data interpretation

full rationale

This experimental ARPES study selects low-substituted samples with comparable T_SDW for comparisons and reports measured trends in hole and electron pocket sizes, noting no clear correlation for central hole pockets but modest trends for the η_X pocket linked to As height. The central suggestion that T_SDW suppression is driven by Fe-As bond length changes (more in planar states) is an interpretive summary of these direct measurements rather than any derivation, model fit, or self-referential construction. No equations, ansatzes, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked to force the result; the paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no reduction of claims to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the experimental observation that pocket sizes can be extracted reliably from polarization-dependent ARPES maps and that As height can be taken from prior structural data without additional fitting. No free parameters are introduced in the abstract; no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Polarization-dependent ARPES can cleanly separate bands of different orbital character in these materials.
    Invoked when the authors assign planar character to the states whose size correlates with As height.
  • domain assumption Low substitution levels produce minimal additional disorder that would otherwise broaden or shift the observed pockets.
    Required for the claim that the observed trends are driven by Fe-As bond length rather than by substitution-induced scattering.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5846 in / 1487 out tokens · 35383 ms · 2026-05-18T13:59:41.717265+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and van Roekeghemet al.[22] generally suggest that the FS is dominated byt2g orbitals, whereas thee g orbitals lie well belowE F or contribute only at specific regions of the BZ, such as near the Z point. Similar conclusions were reached by Pfau et al.[25] in their ARPES study of twinned and detwinned BFA, where nematicity was shown to induce a splitting ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In fact, the Mn-substitution study showed that even at higher nominal substitution levels, theγband undergoes little evolution relative to the pure com- pound

    and Mn-substitution [29]. In fact, the Mn-substitution study showed that even at higher nominal substitution levels, theγband undergoes little evolution relative to the pure com- pound. In contrast, the Cr-BFA sample exhibits a markedly enlargedγpocket, consistent with previous reports, indicat- ing that Cr introduces hole doping and enhances the size of ...

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Kamihara, T

    Y . Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc.130, 3296 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Rotter, M

    M. Rotter, M. Tegel, D. Johrendt, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, and R. Pöttgen, Phys. Rev. B78, 020503 (2008). 11

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    P. C. Canfield and S. L. Bud’ko, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 27 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Hosono, A

    H. Hosono, A. Yamamoto, H. Hiramatsu, and Y . Ma, Mater. Today21, 278 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Hosono and K

    H. Hosono and K. Kuroki, Physica C514, 399 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Paglione and R

    J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, Nat. Phys.6, 645 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    G. R. Stewart, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1589 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Yang, F.-J

    W. Yang, F.-J. Jia, L.-Y . Tang, Q. Tao, Z.-A. Xu, and X.-J. Chen, J. Appl. Phys.115, 083915 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Rotter, M

    M. Rotter, M. Pangerl, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.47, 7949 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Hardy, P

    F. Hardy, P. Adelmann, T. Wolf, H. v. Löhneysen, and C. Mein- gast, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 187004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, H. Kito, M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, T. Ito, K. Kihou, H. Matsuhata, M. Braden, and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.77, 083704 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Mizuguchi, Y

    Y . Mizuguchi, Y . Hara, K. Deguchi, S. Tsuda, T. Yamaguchi, K. Takeda, H. Kotegawa, H. Tou, and Y . Takano, Supercond. Sci. Technol.23, 054013 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    I. A. Nekrasov, Z. V . Pchelkina, and M. V . Sadovskii, JETP Lett. 88, 144 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    L. Li, J. Wang, Y . Liang, Y . Cui, H. Tao, S. Liu, B. Song, J. Jian, Z. Zhang, and M. He, J. Mater. Sci.56, 16533 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Sen and H

    S. Sen and H. Ghosh, Eur. Phys. J. B89(2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    R. A. Jishi and H. M. Alyahyaei, Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2010, 804343 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    D. Lu, M. Yi, S.-K. Mo, J. Analytis, J.-H. Chu, A. Erickson, D. Singh, Z. Hussain, T. Geballe, I. Fisher, and Z.-X. Shen, Physica C469, 452 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    J. H. Shim, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B79, 060501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Suzuki, H

    K. Suzuki, H. Usui, S. Iimura, Y . Sato, S. Matsuishi, H. Hosono, and K. Kuroki, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 027002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Nature601, 35 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Nat. Mater.10, 932 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    van Roekeghem, P

    A. van Roekeghem, P. Richard, H. Ding, and S. Biermann, C. R. Phys.17, 140 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Graser, A

    S. Graser, A. F. Kemper, T. A. Maier, H.-P. Cheng, P. J. Hirschfeld, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B81, 214503 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Y . Wang, M. N. Gastiasoro, B. M. Andersen, M. Tomi´c, H. O. Jeschke, R. Valentí, I. Paul, and P. Hirschfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097003 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    H. Pfau, C. R. Rotundu, J. C. Palmstrom, S. D. Chen, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, A. F. Kemper, I. R. Fisher, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. B99, 035118 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    D. V . Evtushinsky, V . B. Zabolotnyy, T. K. Kim, A. A. Kordyuk, A. N. Yaresko, J. Maletz, S. Aswartham, S. Wurmehl, A. V . Boris, D. L. Sun, C. T. Lin, B. Shen, H. H. Wen, A. Varykhalov, R. Follath, B. Büchner, and S. V . Borisenko, Phys. Rev. B89, 064514 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Mansart, V

    B. Mansart, V . Brouet, E. Papalazarou, M. Fuglsang Jensen, L. Petaccia, S. Gorovikov, A. N. Grum-Grzhimailo, F. Rullier- Albenque, A. Forget, D. Colson, and M. Marsi, Phys. Rev. B 83, 064516 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Zhang, F

    Y . Zhang, F. Chen, C. He, B. Zhou, B. P. Xie, C. Fang, W. F. Tsai, X. H. Chen, H. Hayashi, J. Jiang, H. Iwasawa, K. Shi- mada, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, J. P. Hu, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. B83, 054510 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    M. R. Cantarino, K. R. Pakuszewski, B. Salzmann, P. H. A. Moya, W. R. d. S. Neto, G. S. Freitas, P. G. Pagliuso, W. H. Brito, C. Monney, C. Adriano, and F. A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245124 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    M. R. Cantarino, K. R. Pakuszewski, B. Salzmann, P. H. A. Moya, W. R. da Silva Neto, G. S. Freitas, P. G. Pagliuso, C. Adriano, W. H. Brito, and F. A. Garcia, SciPost Phys.17, 141 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    J. Fink, E. D. L. Rienks, M. Yao, R. Kurleto, J. Bannies, S. Aswartham, I. Morozov, S. Wurmehl, T. Wolf, F. Hardy, C. Meingast, H. S. Jeevan, J. Maiwald, P. Gegenwart, C. Felser, and B. Büchner, Phys. Rev. B103, 155119 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    E. M. Bittar, C. Adriano, T. M. Garitezi, P. F. S. Rosa, L. Men- don ça Ferreira, F. Garcia, G. d. M. Azevedo, P. G. Pagliuso, and E. Granado, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 267402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    T. M. Garitezi, C. Adriano, P. F. S. Rosa, E. M. Bittar, L. Bu- faiçal, R. L. d. Almeida, E. Granado, T. Grant, Z. Fisk, M. A. Avila, R. A. Ribeiro, P. L. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, R. R. Urbano, and P. G. Pagliuso, Braz. J. Phys.43, 223 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Damascelli, Z

    A. Damascelli, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    See Supplemental Material at, [url will be inserted by pub- lisher], for details of ARPES analysis and fittings

    work page

  38. [38]

    Matsuyama and G.-H

    K. Matsuyama and G.-H. Gweon, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 246401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Avigo, S

    I. Avigo, S. Thirupathaiah, E. D. L. Rienks, L. Rettig, A. Char- nukha, M. Ligges, R. Cortes, J. Nayak, H. S. Jeevan, T. Wolf, Y . Huang, S. Wurmehl, M. I. Sturza, P. Gegenwart, M. S. Golden, L. X. Yang, K. Rossnagel, M. Bauer, B. Büchner, M. V ojta, M. Wolf, C. Felser, J. Fink, and U. Bovensiepen, Phys. Status Solidi B254, 1600382 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Zhang,Photoemission Spectroscopy on High Temperature Superconductor(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    W. Zhang,Photoemission Spectroscopy on High Temperature Superconductor(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    J. Fink, E. D. L. Rienks, S. Thirupathaiah, J. Nayak, A. van Roekeghem, S. Biermann, T. Wolf, P. Adelmann, H. S. Jeevan, P. Gegenwart, S. Wurmehl, C. Felser, and B. Buechner, Phys. Rev. B95, 144513 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    J. A. Sobota, Y . He, and Z.-X. Shen, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    M. Yi, D. H. Lu, R. Yu, S. C. Riggs, J.-H. Chu, B. Lv, Z. K. Liu, M. Lu, Y .-T. Cui, M. Hashimoto, S.-K. Mo, Z. Hussain, C. W. Chu, I. R. Fisher, Q. Si, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 067003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    M. Yi, Z. K. Liu, Y . Zhang, R. Yu, J. X. Zhu, J. J. Lee, R. G. Moore, F. T. Schmitt, W. Li, S. C. Riggs, J. H. Chu, B. Lv, J. Hu, M. Hashimoto, S. K. Mo, Z. Hussain, Z. Q. Mao, C. W. Chu, I. R. Fisher, Q. Si, Z. X. Shen, and D. H. Lu, Nat. Commun.6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    H. Miao, Z. P. Yin, S. F. Wu, J. M. Li, J. Ma, B.-Q. Lv, X. P. Wang, T. Qian, P. Richard, L.-Y . Xing, X.-C. Wang, C. Q. Jin, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and H. Ding, Phys. Rev. B94, 201109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Zhang, L

    Y . Zhang, L. X. Yang, F. Chen, B. Zhou, X. F. Wang, X. H. Chen, M. Arita, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, J. P. Hu, B. P. Xie, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 117003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Brouet, M

    V . Brouet, M. F. Jensen, P.-H. Lin, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, P. Le Fèvre, F. Bertran, C.-H. Lin, W. Ku, A. Forget, and D. Col- son, Phys. Rev. B86, 075123 (2012)

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    L. D. Landau, Sov. Phys. JETP8, 70 (1959)

    work page 1959

  49. [49]

    Si and F

    Q. Si and F. Steglich, Science329, 1161 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    G. R. Stewart, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 797 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    C. M. Varma, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 031001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1996 (1989)

    work page 1996